Next Article in Journal
Developing a New Type of Annular Flow Field Based on Murray’s Law in Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers
Previous Article in Journal
Vibrational Radiative Double Diffusion in Buongiorno’s Nanofluid Model Within Inclined Chambers Filled with Non-Darcy Porous Elements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formation of Electrode Materials in the Process of Carbothermic Flux Smelting of Ilmenite Concentrate and Hydrothermal Refining of Titanium Slag

by
Kuralai Akhmetova
,
Sergey Gladyshev
,
Nessipbay Tussupbayev
,
Bagdaulet Kenzhaliev
and
Leila Imangaliyeva
*
The Institute of Metallurgy and Beneficiation, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(5), 1554; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051554 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 April 2025 / Revised: 13 May 2025 / Accepted: 15 May 2025 / Published: 17 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Processes and Systems)

Abstract

:
The present study demonstrates, for the first time, the fundamental possibility of producing electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries through low-temperature carbothermic smelting of ilmenite concentrate fluxed with calcined soda and diatomite, followed by aqueous refining of titanium slag. The primary phase composition of the slag includes Na2Ti3O7 (48.2%), Na0.23TiO2 (22.0%), Na2TiSiO5 (11%), and Na0.67Al0.1Mn0.9O2 (8.5%), which, upon hydrolysis, transform into a monophase titanium dioxide with intercalated sodium—Na0.23TiO2. Thermodynamic analysis of the heat effects of chemical reactions among raw materials and resulting products substantiates the role of silicon and sodium oxides, carbon, oxygen, and water in the formation of various electrode materials during carbothermic flux conversion and aqueous refining. Insights into the mechanisms of thermochemical formation and hydrothermal phase transformations offer a scientific basis for the development of intercalation systems from abundant and low-cost natural raw materials, bypassing the need for expensive precursor synthesis.

1. Introduction

Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are the dominant electrochemical power sources in modern portable electronics and electric vehicles. However, the application of LIBs for many large-scale applications (stationary energy storage, power plant buffer systems, electric passenger transport, etc.) is constrained by the high cost of lithium and the limited and uneven geographical distribution of its raw materials. The development of alternative energy devices, primarily sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) as the closest analog to LIBs, is of paramount importance. The main advantage of SIBs over LIBs is the low cost and wide availability of natural raw materials. SIBs have the longest lifespan among battery energy storage systems. They are effective at high and low temperatures, do not ignite when using water as a solvent, and do not contain harmful minerals such as lithium, cobalt, or nickel. Information on the current state, research directions, achievements, and commercialization of electrode materials and electrolytes for SIBs is most informatively covered in [1,2,3]. It should be noted that stationary room-temperature SIBs have recently become widespread in large-scale energy systems and smart systems. SIBs use the same sodium storage mechanism as lithium in LIBs, so selecting suitable electrodes with low cost, satisfactory performance, and high reliability is a crucial factor in the development of SIBs.
Titanium anodes are an ideal material combining excellent corrosion resistance, durability, lightness, non-toxicity, and good electrical conductivity. Numerous studies have been published on the methods of obtaining, morphology, and electrochemical properties of the anode material sodium titanate Na2Ti3O7, intended for SIBs, which can reversibly intercalate two Na+ ions at an average potential of 0.3 V (vs. Na/Na+), with its theoretical capacity being approximately 200 mAh/g [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The main methods of its production are solid-state, as well as hydrothermal and sol–gel synthesis methods. Titanium dioxide TiO2 [4,5,12], metallic titanium powders [10], titanic acid [13], tetrabutoxytitanate (C4H9O)4Ti [11], and titanium chloride TiCl3 [14] are used as precursors.
A sandwich-like Na0.23TiO2/Ti3C2 nanocomposite has been created, demonstrating long-term cycling stability (up to 4000 cycles at high rates with almost 100% capacity retention) and remarkable fast-charging capability when used as anodes in LIBs and SIBs [18]. The composite electrode is manufactured by slow etching of titanium aluminum carbide Ti3AlC2 powder at 40 °C for 20 h. The separated layered nanosheets of titanium carbide Ti3C2 are repeatedly washed with deionized water to pH 6–7 and dried in a vacuum at 60 °C for 8 h. By dispersion using ultrasound, partial oxidation of Ti3C2, and holding for 100 h in a NaOH solution, continuous stirring of the reaction mixture at room temperature forms curly one-dimensional amorphous Na0.23TiO2 nanotubes growing on two-dimensional layered Ti3C2 nanosheets. The content of Na0.23TiO2 in the Na0.23TiO2/Ti3C2 composite is about 75 wt.%. Amorphous Na0.23TiO2 nanobelts, capable of withstanding high deformations, play an important role as they contribute to the main capacity of the batteries as an active material. Ti3C2 nanosheets improve the electrical conductivity of the Na0.23TiO2/Ti3C2 composite electrode by ensuring the efficiency of electron transfer from the electrode to the nanobelts. The long-term cyclic ability of the anode made of Na0.23TiO2 nanoparticles embedded in a carbon network, created by pyrosynthesis using polyol (a carbon source) for SIBs, is confirmed in [19].
A vast class of materials with promising technological applications is represented by titanosilicates, mainly synthesized by hydrothermal synthesis methods [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Framework titanosilicates with the structure of natural minerals natisite and sitinakite were obtained by hydrothermal–autoclave synthesis for the sorption of radionuclides Cs137, Sr90, Eu152. Finely dispersed high-purity titanosilicate TiSiO4∙nH2O was synthesized by the hydrothermal–microwave method. Carbon coating and double nano-size modification improved the electrochemical characteristics of lithium titanosilicate Li2TiSiO5 for lithium-ion batteries, which has a large reversible capacity of 257 mAh∙g−1, high performance, and excellent cycling stability with 90.0% capacity retention at 5000 mA∙g−1 for 4000 cycles.
The above methods for synthesizing titanates and titanosilicates involve the use of expensive, analytically pure precursors, which predetermines a serious problem for the large-scale production of electrode materials.
Below are the results of our research on obtaining promising electrode materials directly from ilmenite concentrate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

This work involved the processing of a difficult-to-enrich ilmenite concentrate (IC) from the sandy–clayey ore of the Satpayev deposit in Eastern Kazakhstan provided by the Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant (JSC ‘UK TMK’). Fluxing additives included anthracite with a 3.87% ash content, 3.03% technical-grade calcined soda of the highest quality (granulated, grade OKP 21 3111 0220, and powdered, grade OKP 21 3111 0120), with a sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) mass fraction of at least 99.4%, an iron content recalculated to Fe2O3 of no more than 0.003%, other impurities within trace amounts in accordance with the quality standard GOST 5100-85 [28] for calcined soda, and diatomite (also known as kieselguhr, a sedimentary natural mineral from the Mugaljar deposit in Western Kazakhstan) containing approximately 80% macroporous amorphous silica (SiO2). Molasses (a byproduct of the sugar industry) was used as a binder at a rate of 3% by weight of the coal charge with IC and fluxing additives.

2.2. Main Equipment and Technological Conditions

Thoroughly mixed coal charges with a mass ratio of IC:Na2CO3:SiO2 = 1:0.5:0.3, loaded into press forms, were compacted on a Metallkraft WPP 50M (Guangzhou, China) hydraulic press with a compression force increasing from 100 to 50,000 kg (Figure 1a). The carbothermal melting of the briquettes, placed in graphite crucibles with tightly fitting graphite lids, was carried out in a NOBERTHERM (Laupheim, Germany) muffle furnace at a temperature of 1573÷1673 K for 120 min (Figure 1b). Magnetic separation of the cooled and crushed sintered briquettes in ambient air was performed using a laboratory magnetic separator from “Prodecology–Scientific and Production Company” (Kyiv, Ukraine) with manual adjustment of the magnetic field strength from 80 to 900 Tl (Figure 1c).
The primary titanium slag was refined with water at a solid–liquid ratio of 3:1, at a temperature of 353÷363 K for 4 h with an impeller speed of 500 rpm using a mechanical stirrer ES from the company “Velp–Scientifica” (Usmat, Italy) in thermostated beakers heated through an external jacket with hot water from the circulating thermostat LT–108 from the company “LOIP” (Budapest, Hungary). The alkaline pulp from the water refining of titanium slag was filtered using a vacuum water-jet pump through a Büchner funnel with “blue tape” paper filter.

2.3. Physical and Chemical Studies

The fractional composition of a representative batch of the Satpaev ilmenite concentrate was determined by classification on a vibrating screen with a set of standard sieve fabrics of different sizes. The chemical composition of the concentrate and the obtained products was studied using X-ray fluorescence analysis on a wavelength dispersive spectrometer Venus 200 PANalytical B.V. (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and X-ray phase analysis (XRD) on a BRUKER D8 ADVANCE (Freiburg, Germany) diffractometer with copper radiation at an accelerating voltage of 36 kV and a current of 25 mA. The alkalinity of the filtrate from the pulp of the aqueous refining of primary titanium slag was analyzed using pH metric and titrimetric measurements, employing a 1% solution of hydrochloric acid, a 0.1% solution of phenolphthalein as an acid-base indicator, and a 0.1% solution of methyl orange as a pH indicator.

2.4. Thermodynamic Analysis

The numerical values of the thermal effects of individual and total chemical reactions of the carbothermic conversion process of ilmenite concentrate were determined, taking into account the heat capacities ∆C°p of the reacting substances and the resulting products according to the stoichiometric coefficients of the equation by calculating the enthalpy ∆H°T, entropy ∆S°T, and Gibbs energy ∆G°T in each temperature interval from 373 to 2273 K using standard reference thermodynamic values at 298 K [29].

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Ilmenite Concentrate

The size and mass fraction of the granules of the ilmenite concentrate are presented in Table 1, the content of titanium oxides and the main accompanying elements in Table 2, and the mineral composition is shown in Figure 2.
According to the RFAS, the mineral basis of the concentrate (over 60%) consists of primary ilmenite FeTiO3, tightly fused with the platy surface of hematite Fe2O3 grains, commonly referred to as hemo-ilmenite, alongside which a polymorphic variety of leucoxenic ilmenite is present in the form of pseudorutile of no-–stoichiometric composition Fe9.48Mn0.54Ti19.32O50, accounting for 14%.
The presence of the rock-forming fine-dispersed aluminosilicate mineral kyanite Al2SiO5, which cements the titanium minerals, and the non-compliance of the chemical composition with the regulated requirements for impurities exclude the possibility of processing the Satpayev ilmenite concentrate by commercial enrichment methods.
By selecting technologically acceptable conditions, we have established that carbothermic smelting with the addition of diatomite and calcined soda to the ilmenite concentrate feed ensures complete rapid reduction of iron and effective stratification of the titanium slag melt and alloyed the entire mass of iron, with significantly lower electricity costs and process duration (see Figure 3 and Figure 4).
It should be noted that the degree of enrichment of the slag with titanium dioxide (curve 2), despite the completeness of separation from iron (curve 1), decreases with an increasing mass fraction of diatomite in the coal–ilmenite feed, particularly noticeable when the silicon oxide content exceeds 30%, as clearly observed in Figure 3a. However, the degree of enrichment of the slag, assessed by its TiO2 content, steadily increases even with a significantly higher mass fraction of sodium oxide from soda in the feed, as shown in Figure 3b (curve 2).

3.2. Material Composition of Primary and Modified Titanium Slag

It has been found that flux additives not only improve the technical and economic indicators of the carbothermal smelting process of non-conforming raw materials but also ensure the production of primary titanium slag, which is almost 90% a solid-phase mixture of electrode materials, primarily consisting of sodium trititanate Na2Ti3O7 (more than 48%), sodium-intercalated titanium dioxide (22%), sodium titanate Na2TiSiO5 (11%), and sodium- and aluminum-intercalated manganese dioxide Na0.67 AI0.1Mn0.9O2 (8.5%) (Figure 5).
The optimization of the technological conditions for refining primary titanium slag with water resulted in a monophase titanium dioxide with intercalated sodium Na0.23TiO2 (Figure 6).
The reproducibility of the laboratory research results has been confirmed by successful tests on the pilot plant of the Experimental and Production Institute of Metallurgy and Ore Beneficiation (PEMP of JSC «IMOB»). Experimental tests of the technological indicators of each key operation were conducted through careful verification of the optimal modes selected by detailed laboratory studies three times. No discrepancies were found in the actually identical results of the analysis. The phase composition and yield of electrode materials in the primary and modified titanium slag are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The extraction of titanium dioxide amounted to no less than 93%.

4. Mechanism of Formation of Electrode Materials

4.1. Thermodynamics of the Reactions of Calcined Soda Decomposition

To understand the mechanism of electrode material formation, it is essential to first consider the influence of the flux additives calcined soda and diatomite on the carbothermic conversion of ilmenite concentrate.
Soda ash Na2CO3 (anhydrous sodium carbonate–natrite), as is known, decomposes into sodium oxide Na2O and carbon dioxide CO2 at a temperature of 1000 °C (or 1273 K) [30]. The decomposition of alkali metal carbonates is known to be facilitated by the removal of the generated CO2 or the elimination of Na2O from the reaction mixture by adding anhydride, for example, SiO2, a very weak but thermally stable silicic acid that forms a silicate salt with the base Na2O [31].
By calculating the numerical values of the thermal effects of chemical reactions involving the starting substances and the resulting products, it has been established that the key chemical activator for the carbothermic conversion of ilmenite is calcined soda. The catalytic initiator for the decomposition of soda at room temperature is diatomaceous silica. It has been found that the thermal decomposition of crystalline soda (the decahydrate of sodium carbonate, known in modern mineralogy as natron, Na2CO3·10H2O), which begins at 573 K, is accelerated by the presence of SiO2 and shifts to a lower temperature range of 373 K (irreversible reactions (1) and (2) with numerical values of ΔH°T > 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0 for T > ΔH°/ΔS°, occurring due to the entropic factor that indicates the tendency of the composite components of the alkali reagent to dissociate, as shown in Figure 7). The catalytic effect of SiO2 is particularly pronounced on the thermal decomposition of powdered soda (anhydrous sodium carbonate–natrite) (exothermic reaction (3)). The decomposition of natron and natrite is intensified due to the active reactivity of SiO2 and Na2O from soda, forming the low-melting metasilicate of sodium, Na2SiO3 (acid–base reaction (4) with numerical values of ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T < 0, ΔG°T < 0 for T < ΔH°/ΔS°, occurring at any temperature within the studied range due to the enthalpic factor indicating the tendency of SiO2 and Na2O to form strong bonds).
Upon contact with carbon, calcined soda decomposes to produce sodium and carbon dioxide (CO2)—the Deville process (irreversible reactions (5) and (6)). By reacting with the oxygen in the carbon dioxide released during the decomposition of soda, carbon forms carbon monoxide (CO), which accelerates the reduction of iron oxides by penetrating the cracks and pores of ilmenite concentrate minerals (reaction (7)).
Na2CO3 10H2O → Na2O + 10H2O + CO2
SiO2 + Na2CO3 10H2O → Na2SiO3 + 10H2O + CO2
SiO2 + Na2CO3 → Na2SiO3 + CO2
SiO2 + Na2O → Na2SiO3
0.115Na2CO3·10H2O + 0.0575 C → 0.23Na + 1.15H2O + 0.1725CO2
0.335Na2CO3·10H2O + 0.1675 C → 0.67Na + 3.35H2O + 0.5025CO2
CO2 + C → 2CO

4.2. Thermodynamics of Decomposition Reactions of Ilmenite Concentrate

The carbothermic conversion of ilmenite concentrate (IC), triggered by the intense decomposition of Na2CO3 in the presence of SiO2, begins at 673 K (overall reaction (8) with numerical values ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T < 0, ΔG°T < 0 for T < ΔH°/ΔS°), occurring throughout the studied temperature range due to the enthalpic factor associated with the predominant thermal effect of forming electrode materials Na2Ti3O7, Na0.23TiO2, Na2TiSiO5, and Na0.67Al0.1Mn0.9O2 (Figure 8), identified through X-ray phase analysis of the crystalline phase of primary titanium slag (Figure 5).
The raw material source for the first three electrode materials is ilmenite (FeTiO3)—a widely distributed natural titaniferous iron ore (FeO∙TiO=)—which forms the mineral basis of the concentrate, along with pseudorutile—a variety of leucoxenized ilmenite with a non-stoichiometric composition Fe9.48Mn0.54Ti19.32O50.
The carbothermic decomposition of ilmenite is accompanied by the formation predominantly of Na2Ti3O7 (irreversible reactions (9) and (10) with numerical values ΔH°T > 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0 for T > ΔH°/ΔS°, occurring due to the entropic factor). Na0.23TiO2 is formed as a result of sodium incorporation into the interlayer space of titanium dioxide released during ilmenite decomposition (reaction (11) with numerical values ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0, spontaneously occurring in the temperature range of 473–873 K without decomposing ilmenite, and above 873 K due to entropic destruction of the natural mineral). Na2TiSiO5 is formed under the combined action of Na2O and SiO2 (spontaneously occurring reaction (12) with numerical values ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0 over a wide temperature range of 373–1473 K).
FeTiO3 + 3.52Fe9.48Mn0.54Ti19.32O50 + 0.05Al2SiO5 + 15.974C + 24.199Na2CO3 +
1.95SiO2 → 32.4036Fe + 22.634Na2Ti3O7 + 2Na0.23TiO2 + Na2TiSiO5 +
Na0.67Al0.1Mn0.9O2 + MnSiO3 + Fe1.966O2.963 + 40.173C
15FeTiO3 + 5Na2O + 0.46Na + 6C + SiO2 → 15Fe + 4Na2Ti3O7 + 2Na0.23TiO2 +
Na2TiSiO5 + 9CO2
12FeTiO3 + 4Na2O + 6C → 12Fe + 4Na2Ti3O7 + 6CO2
2FeTiO3 + 0.46Na + 2CO → 2Fe + 2Na0.23TiO2 + 2CO2
FeTiO3 + Na2O + SiO2 + CO → Fe + Na2TiSiO5 + CO2
As expected, the activator of the thermal decomposition of ilmenite is sodium alkali oxide (from soda), which initially binds titanium dioxide in the near-surface, and later in the deeper lattice nodes of the mineral’s crystal structure, forming Na2Ti3O7 and Na2TiSiO5 in conjunction with silicon oxide (Figure 9, reactions (13) and (15), with numerical values of ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0—the first reaction proceeds spontaneously from 373 to 1673 K, and the second at any temperature). The titanium dioxide released from the ilmenite crystal lattice during the reduction of iron oxides is further bound by sodium metasilicate formed via reaction (4) (an entropy-driven reaction (16), with numerical values of ΔH°T > 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0 at T > ΔH°/ΔS°, starting from 673 K).
4Na2O + 12TiO2 → 4Na2Ti3O7
0.46Na + TiO2 → 2Na0.23TiO2
Na2O + SiO2 + TiO2 → Na2TiSiO5
Na2SiO3 + TiO2 → Na2TiSiO5
The binding of titanium dioxide with sodium and silicon oxides, as well as with sodium metasilicate, prevents the formation of high-melting, rapidly crystallizing lower titanium oxides such as Ti2O3 (melting point 2403 K), Ti3O5 (melting point 2473 K), and TiO (melting point 2293 K). The formation of low-melting compounds such as sodium metasilicate Na2SiO3 (melting point 1361–1362 K), sodium titanate Na2Ti3O7 (melting point 1401 K), and sodium titanium silicate Na2TiSiO5 (melting point 1173–1303 K) accelerates the reduction of iron and ensures the efficiency of the spontaneous separation of free-flowing melts of metallic iron and titanium slag with significantly lower energy costs and reduced process duration.
For example, the temperature of the carbothermic melting of ilmenite concentrate, which has been previously subjected to oxidizing roasting at 1090 °C (1363 K) according to the technology of the canadian company Quebec Iron and Titanium (QIT), the largest producer of titanium slag in the province of Quebec, North America, is 1700 °C (1973 K). To improve the quality, low-grade primary titanium Sorel slag undergoes modernization through repeated oxidative roasting and carbothermic melting in similar temperature regimes [32]. The South African company Richards Bay Minerals (RBM), a leading producer of titanium slag, pig iron, rutile, and zircon, employs an adapted technology developed by the Canadian company QIT, which also involves a high-temperature carbothermic melting process of pre-oxidized ilmenite concentrate extracted from the Zululand coast in the northern region of KwaZulu-Natal province [33]. In Kazakhstan, at the Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant, which holds a leading position in the global market for premium-class [34] titanium sponge, titanium slag is produced from coal–ilmenite charge at a temperature of 1600 °C (1873 K) over a period of 8 h.
Flux additives introduced into the carbonaceous charge of the ilmenite concentrate exert a similar effect on the decomposition of pseudorutile (Figure 10, reaction (17), with numerical values of ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T < 0, ΔG°T < 0 at T < ΔH°/ΔS°, occurring in the low-temperature range of 373–1073 K due to the dominant enthalpic effect of the formation of sodium trititanate Na2Ti3O7 and manganese metasilicate MnSiO3—a synthetic analog of the natural mineral rhodonite).
The rock-forming aluminosilicate mineral of the ilmenite concentrate, kyanite (Al2SiO5), decomposes under the action of carbon, which reduces chemically active aluminum (reaction (18), which proceeds spontaneously with ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T > 0, ΔG°T < 0 at any temperature).
The byproduct of pseudorutile decomposition, manganese metasilicate MnSiO3, decomposes under the influence of evaporating water vapor, which oxidizes divalent manganese, converting it into its most stable tetravalent oxide form (reaction (19), with ΔH°T < 0, ΔS°T < 0, ΔG°T < 0 at T < ΔH°/ΔS°, proceeding in the temperature range of 373–1473 K due to the enthalpic factor).
The incorporation of sodium and aluminum into the tunnel structure of manganese dioxide represents the final stage in the formation of the intercalate Na0.67Al0.1Mn0.9O2, with the initial stage being pseudorutile decomposition and the intermediate stage being the oxidation of Mn2⁺ (enthalpic reaction (20)).
Fe9.48Mn0.54Ti19.32O50 + 5.41C + 6.44Na2O + 0.54SiO2 → 9.48Fe + 6.44Na2Ti3O7 +
0.54MnSiO3 + 5.41CO2
0.05AI2SiO5 + 0.075C → 0.1AI + 0.05SiO2 + 0.075CO2
0.9MnSiO3 + 0.55O2 → Mn0.9O2 + 0.9SiO2
0.67Na + 0.1AI + Mn0.9O2 → Na0.67 AI0.1Mn0.9O2
Considering the size of the intercalated sodium atom (190 pm), the manganese dioxide intercalate Na0.67Al0.1Mn0.9O2 is most likely a polymorphic modification of cryptomelane (α–MnO2) or birnessite (δ–MnO2), which possess either large open-channel or weakly bonded layered structures. These structures easily accommodate large-radius cations such as Na⁺ (116 pm), Ba⁺ (149 pm), and K⁺ (152 pm) with a coordination number of 6.

4.3. Thermodynamics of Titanium Slag-Refining Reactions with Water

The refining of titanium slag with water is of great practical significance for the production of intercalation systems based on titanium dioxide. The process is thermodynamically justified by the hydrolytic decomposition in the low-temperature range of 293–373 K, converting the entire mass of sodium titanate and sodium titanium silicate into ortho- (H4TiO4) and meta- (H2TiO3) titanic acids—that is, into hydrated titanium dioxide (TiO2·2H2O and TiO2·H2O) (enthalpic reactions (21), (23), (24) and spontaneous reaction (22), Figure 11). The hydrothermal destruction involving the breaking of chemical bonds in the crystal lattice of Na2Ti3O7 and Na2TiSiO5 is initiated by the alkaline sodium oxide present in their composition, which reacts vigorously with water to form sodium hydroxide (caustic soda). In this process, chemically active sodium atoms, which readily donate electrons, are ionized by water. Upon gaining a positive electric charge, Na⁺ cations replace hydrogen ions, which are displaced from water molecules as H2, resulting in the formation of sodium hydroxide, a highly alkaline compound. The interaction of sodium with water is a substitution reaction of an exothermic type. Due to sodium’s high chemical reactivity, its interaction with water occurs almost instantly. The rapidly proceeding hydrolytic deformation of the primary anode materials Na2Ti3O7 and Na2TiSiO5, obtained from ilmenite concentrate, is accompanied by the incorporation of highly mobile Na⁺ cations into the layered mesoporous structure of hydrated titanium dioxide. This facilitates the rapid formation of a stable intercalate in an aggressive alkaline environment—[Na0.23TiO20.23OH (enthalpic reaction (25) and spontaneous reaction (26)).
Na2Ti3O7 + 7H2O → 3H4TiO4↓ + 2NaOH
Na2Ti3O7 + 4H2O → 3H2TiO3↓ + 2NaOH
Na2TiSiO5 + 3H2O → H4TiO4↓ + SiO2↓ + 2NaOH
Na2TiSiO5 + 2H2O → H2TiO3↓ + SiO2↓ + 2NaOH
H4TiO4 + 0.23NaOH → [Na0.23TiO2]∙0.23OH + 2H2O
H2TiO3 + 0.23NaOH → [Na0.23TiO2]∙0.23OH + H2O
Thermodynamic analysis revealed that the manganese dioxide intercalate Na0.67Al0.1Mn0.9O2, formed during the carbothermic flux conversion of ilmenite concentrate, is unstable in an aqueous alkaline solution. This is explained by the fact that both aluminum and manganese dioxide, according to literature sources, undergo similar substitution reactions with water as sodium does [30,31]. Aluminum, slowly oxidizing in the presence of oxygen and displacing hydrogen ions from water molecules, forms sodium aluminate (NaAlO2), which is soluble in water [35,36], and in a strongly alkaline medium, it forms sodium tetrahydroxoaluminate (Na[Al(OH)4]) (spontaneous reactions (27) and (28), Figure 12). Manganese dioxide undergoes disproportionation in water to form sodium manganate (Na2MnO4) (reaction (29)—enthalpic at 273 K, and spontaneous as the temperature increases).
2AI + 2NaOH + 2H2O → 2NaAIO2 + 3H2
AI + NaOH + 3H2O → Na[AI(OH)4] + 1.5H2
2MnO2 + O2 + 4NaOH = 2Na2MnO4 + 2H2O
The desiliconization of water-modified titanium slag using ammonium bifluoride confirmed the possibility of concentrating the content of titanium oxide intercalate. Research aiming at creating pure electrode materials from natural raw materials with specified electrochemical properties is ongoing.

5. Conclusions

The production of the anodic intercalate of titanium dioxide by carbothermic smelting of ilmenite concentrate fluxed with diatomite and calcined soda, followed by the refining of titanium slag with water, represents an innovative technical solution for the large-scale production of cheap sodium-ion batteries.
The regulation of the composition of coal–ilmenite charge with fluxes is a key technological condition for the creation of electrode materials. The formation of electrode materials is accelerated by the presence of diatomaceous silica, which catalytically initiates the decomposition of calcined soda, breaking down into sodium oxide and sodium upon contact with coal, as well as sodium oxide from soda, which activates the destruction of ilmenite and its leucoxene analog, pseudorutile, through individual binding with titanium dioxide and in conjunction with silicon oxide. Due to the reactive properties of sodium and silicon oxides, the formation of lower-melting-point titanium oxides is prevented, iron reduction is accelerated, the separation of titanium slag melts and alloyed cast iron is facilitated, and energy costs are significantly reduced.
The refining of titanium slag with water ensures complete hydrolytic cleavage of sodium titanate and sodium titanosilicate formed during the carbothermic flux conversion of ilmenite concentrate, instant ionization of sodium acquiring a positive electric charge, and rapid formation of a monophase stable intercalate of mesoporous titanium dioxide Na0.23TiO2, purified from water-soluble byproducts in an aggressive alkaline environment.
The manganese dioxide intercalate Na0.67AI0.1Mn0.9O2 lacks structural strength due to the high reactivity of its aluminum and manganese components.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.; methodology, L.I.; software, S.G.; validation, S.G., N.T. and K.A.; formal analysis, L.I.; investigation, S.G.; resources, K.A.; data curation, S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A.; writing—review and editing, S.G.; visualization, N.T.; supervision, K.A.; project administration, B.K.; funding acquisition, K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant project No. AP19677721).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yabuuchi, N.; Kubota, K.; Dahbi, M.; Komaba, S. Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11636–11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hwang, J.-Y.; Myung, S.-T.; Sun, Y.-K. Sodiumion batteries: Present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3529–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yu, T.; Li, G.; Duan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, X.; Luo, M.; Liu, Y. The Research and Industrialization Progress and Prospects of Sodium Ion Battery. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 958, 170486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rudola, A.; Saravanan, K.; Mason, C.W.; Balaya, P. Na2Ti3O7: An intercalation based anode for sodium-ion battery applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2653–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, Y.; Lotfabad, E.M.; Wang, H.; Farbod, B.; Xu, Z.; Kohandehghan, A.; Mitlin, D. Nanocrystalline anatase TiO2: A new anode material for rechargeable sodium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8973–8975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, L.; Buchholz, D.; Bresser, D.; Chagas, L.G.; Passerini, S. Anatase TiO2 nanoparticles for high power sodium-ion anodes. J. Power Sources 2014, 251, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nava-Avendaño, J.; Morales-García, A.; Ponrouch, A.; Rousse, G.; Frontera, C.; Senguttuvan, P.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Dompablo, M.E.A.-D.; Palacín, M.R. Taking steps forward in understanding the electrochemical behavior of Na2Ti3O7. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 22280–22286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, H.; Yang, K.; Lan, H.; Qian, S.; Yu, H.; Yan, L.; Long, N.; Shui, M.; Shu, J. Electrochemical kinetics of Na2Ti3O7 as anode material for lithium–ion batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 788, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, X.; Sun, D.; Jiang, J.; Yan, W.; Jin, Y. Self-assembled twine-like Na2Ti3O7 nanostructure as advanced anode for sodium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 697, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patent CN108455663; IPC C01G23/00, H01M10/054, H01M4/485. 28 August 2018. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5e/f6/1d/d3040ed58187a4/CN108455663A.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  11. Patent CN108134075; IPC H01M4/485. 8 June 2018. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/51/71/e7/0cbd0f60faab6f/CN108134075A.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  12. Patent CN109148876; IPC C01G23/00, H01M10/54, H01M4/485, H01M4/58. 4 January 2019. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/25/69/9b/7f383c2825c07a/CN109148876A.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  13. Patent CN109626415; IPC C01G23/00, H01M10/054, H01M4/485. 16 April 2019. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/95/40/8c/501fb8e6d4da59/CN109626415A.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  14. Zakharova, G.S.; Fattakhova, Z.A. Method of Producing Sodium. Patent RU 2 716 186. Application No. 2019127022, 28 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pan, J.; Wang, N.; Lv, D.; Dong, W.; Yang, J.; Huang, F. Layered Structure Na2Ti3O7 as a Promising Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2021, 2, 2000095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Piffet, C.; Eshraghi, N.; Mottet, G.; Hatert, F.; Światowska, J.; Cloots, R.; Boschini, F.; Mahmoud, A. Effect of the Calcination Duration on the Electrochemical Properties of Na2Ti3O7 as Anode Material for Na-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, Z.; Ke, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, F.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, B.; et al. Building a Stable Plateau—Type Na2Ti3O7 Anode Interface toward Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 2472–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, J.; Meng, R.; Zu, L.; Wang, Z.; Feng, N.; Yang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Yang, J. Sandwich-like Na0.23TiO2 nanobelt/Ti3C2 MXene composites from a scalable in situ transformation reaction for long-life high-rate lithium/sodium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2018, 46, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chandel, S.; Zulkifli; Singh, J.; Kim, J.; Rai, A.K. Facile synthesis of Na0.23TiO2 nanoparticles anode wrapped within full carbon network with high-rate capability for sodium ion battery application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 290, 126600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Perovskiy, I.A. Synthesis of Titanosilicates from Leucoxene Ores. Bull. Tomsk. State Univ. 2014, 384, 182–188. [Google Scholar]
  21. Method for Obtaining Sodium–Containing Titanium Silicate. Patent RU2014126038/05A, 20 November 2015.
  22. Oleksiienko, O.; Meleshevych, S.; Strelko, V.; Wolkersdorfer, C.; Tsyba, M.M.; Kylivnyk, Y.M.; Levchuk, I.; Sitarz, M.; Sillanpää, M. Pore structure and sorption characterization of titanosilicates obtained from concentrated precursors by the sol–gel method. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 72562–72571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, J.; Pang, W.K.; Zhou, T.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Peterson, V.K.; Yang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Xia, Y. Li2TiSiO5: A Low Potential and Large Capacity Ti-Based Anode Material for Li-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1456–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, S.; Li, S.; Gao, J.; Liu, X.; Lin, C. Carbon coated “zero-strain” Li2TiSiO5 nanowires for high-performance lithium storage. Mater. Technol. 2023, 38, 2204292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baghramyan, V.V.; Sargsyan, A.A.; Knyazyan, N.B.; Gerasimova, L.G.; Leonelli, C. Synthesis of titaniumsilicate by microwave method. Tpyды Koльскoгo нayчнoгo цeнmpa PAH 2018, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalashnikova, G.O.; Gryaznova, D.V.; Baranchikov, A.E.; Britvin, S.N.; Yakovenchuk, V.N.; Samburov, G.O.; Veselova, V.O.; Pulyalina, A.Y.; Pakhomovsky, Y.A.; Bazai, A.V.; et al. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Titanosilicates Using a Precursor Produced from Titanium Ore Concentrate. Chemengineering 2023, 7, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perovskiy, I.A.; Panikorovskii, T.L.; Shushkov, D.A. Effect of mineralizer and synthesis duration on sorption properties of sitinakite and ivanyukite. Vestn. Geosci. 2024, 3, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. GOST 5100-85; Calcinated Soda Technical. Technical Specifications. IPC Publishing Standards: Moscow, Russia, 2002.
  29. Lidin, L.A.; Andreeva, L.L.; Molochko, V.A. Constants of Inorganic Substances; Begell House: Danbury, CT, USA, 1995; 685p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Knunyantsa, I.L. (Ed.) Sodium Carbonate. In Chemical Encyclopedia in 5 Volumes; Great Russian Encyclopedia: Moscow, Russia, 1992; Volume 3, p. 639. ISBN 5-85270-039-8. [Google Scholar]
  31. Remy, G. Course of Inorganic Chemistry; MIR: Moscow, Russia, 1972; Volume 1, 824p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guéguin, M.; Cardarelli, F. Chemistry and mineralogy of titania-rich slags. Part 1—Hemoilmenite, sulphate, and upgraded titania slags. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2007, 28, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Williams, G.E.; Steenkamp, J.D. Heavy Mineral Processing at Richards Bay Minerals. S. Afr. Pyrometallurgy 2006, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schirmer, T.; Achimovičová, M.; Goldmann, D. Influence of chemical and phase composition in the hydrometallurgical processing of FeTi oxide phases. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 191, 105250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lidin, R.A.; Molochko, V.A.; Andreeva, L.L. Reactions of Inorganic Substances. In Handbook, 2nd ed.; Drofa: Moscow, Russia, 2007; 637p. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lidin, R.A.; Andreeva, L.L.; Molochko, V.A. Chemical Properties of Inorganic Substances. In A Textbook for Universities, 3rd ed.; Khimia: Moscow, Russia, 2000; 480p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Hydraulic press Metallkraft WPP 50M (a), NOBERTHERM muffle furnace (b), magnetic separator “Prodeкoлoгiя—scientific and production” (c).
Figure 1. Hydraulic press Metallkraft WPP 50M (a), NOBERTHERM muffle furnace (b), magnetic separator “Prodeкoлoгiя—scientific and production” (c).
Processes 13 01554 g001
Figure 2. Mineral composition of the crystalline phase of ilmenite concentrate.
Figure 2. Mineral composition of the crystalline phase of ilmenite concentrate.
Processes 13 01554 g002
Figure 3. Effect of flux additives SiO2 (a) and Na2O (b) on iron reduction and slag enrichment with titanium dioxide.
Figure 3. Effect of flux additives SiO2 (a) and Na2O (b) on iron reduction and slag enrichment with titanium dioxide.
Processes 13 01554 g003
Figure 4. Titanium slag (a), ingot and reduced iron beads (b).
Figure 4. Titanium slag (a), ingot and reduced iron beads (b).
Processes 13 01554 g004
Figure 5. X-ray of primary titanium slag.
Figure 5. X-ray of primary titanium slag.
Processes 13 01554 g005
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction pattern of water-modified titanium slag.
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction pattern of water-modified titanium slag.
Processes 13 01554 g006
Figure 7. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of calcined soda decomposition reactions.
Figure 7. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of calcined soda decomposition reactions.
Processes 13 01554 g007
Figure 8. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the carbochemical conversion reactions of ilmenite concentrate.
Figure 8. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the carbochemical conversion reactions of ilmenite concentrate.
Processes 13 01554 g008
Figure 9. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the reactions forming titanium oxide and silicon–titanium oxide electrode materials.
Figure 9. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the reactions forming titanium oxide and silicon–titanium oxide electrode materials.
Processes 13 01554 g009
Figure 10. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the reactions forming manganese dioxide intercalated with sodium and aluminum atoms.
Figure 10. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the reactions forming manganese dioxide intercalated with sodium and aluminum atoms.
Processes 13 01554 g010
Figure 11. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the hydrothermal formation reactions of sodium-intercalated titanium dioxide.
Figure 11. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of the hydrothermal formation reactions of sodium-intercalated titanium dioxide.
Processes 13 01554 g011
Figure 12. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of hydrothermal decomposition reactions of manganese dioxide intercalate.
Figure 12. Dependence of the change in ∆G°T (a) and lg Keq (b) on the temperature of hydrothermal decomposition reactions of manganese dioxide intercalate.
Processes 13 01554 g012
Table 1. Fractional composition of ilmenite concentrate.
Table 1. Fractional composition of ilmenite concentrate.
Classes, mmMass Fraction, %
–0.5 + 0.3153.80
–0.315 + 0.227.86
–0.2 + 0.07458.32
–0.074 + 0.0447.22
–0.044 + 0.02.80
Total100
Table 2. Chemical composition of ilmenite concentrate.
Table 2. Chemical composition of ilmenite concentrate.
Mass Fraction, %
TiO2Fe2O3SiO2Al2O3Cr2O3MnOCaOMgOP2O5SO3
52.339.554.830.951.431.740.080.160.0140.014
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akhmetova, K.; Gladyshev, S.; Tussupbayev, N.; Kenzhaliev, B.; Imangaliyeva, L. Formation of Electrode Materials in the Process of Carbothermic Flux Smelting of Ilmenite Concentrate and Hydrothermal Refining of Titanium Slag. Processes 2025, 13, 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051554

AMA Style

Akhmetova K, Gladyshev S, Tussupbayev N, Kenzhaliev B, Imangaliyeva L. Formation of Electrode Materials in the Process of Carbothermic Flux Smelting of Ilmenite Concentrate and Hydrothermal Refining of Titanium Slag. Processes. 2025; 13(5):1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akhmetova, Kuralai, Sergey Gladyshev, Nessipbay Tussupbayev, Bagdaulet Kenzhaliev, and Leila Imangaliyeva. 2025. "Formation of Electrode Materials in the Process of Carbothermic Flux Smelting of Ilmenite Concentrate and Hydrothermal Refining of Titanium Slag" Processes 13, no. 5: 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051554

APA Style

Akhmetova, K., Gladyshev, S., Tussupbayev, N., Kenzhaliev, B., & Imangaliyeva, L. (2025). Formation of Electrode Materials in the Process of Carbothermic Flux Smelting of Ilmenite Concentrate and Hydrothermal Refining of Titanium Slag. Processes, 13(5), 1554. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051554

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop