Next Article in Journal
Current-Mode Controlled Battery Emulator
Previous Article in Journal
Interpretable Machine Learning for Shale Gas Productivity Prediction: Western Chongqing Block Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation on Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage and Coalbed Methane Drainage Displacement—A Case Study in Middle Hunan Depression of China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China

1
Key Laboratory of Safe and Effective Coal Mining, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232000, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Safe Mining of Deep Coal and Environmental Protection, Ltd., Huainan 232000, China
3
The First Exploration Team of Shandong Coalfield Geologic Bureau, Qingdao 266427, China
4
Shandong Engineering Research Center of Mine Gas Disaster Prevention, Qingdao 266427, China
5
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(10), 3280; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103280
Submission received: 13 September 2025 / Revised: 2 October 2025 / Accepted: 11 October 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025

Abstract

Coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs in southwestern China are characterized by thick, multi-layered coal sequences partitioned into several independent pressure systems by impermeable strata. Commingled production from multiple coal seams in such multi-superposed CBM systems often suffers from severe inter-layer interference, leading to suboptimal gas recovery. To address this challenge, we developed a systematic four-step optimization workflow integrating geological data screening, pressure compartmentalization analysis, and numerical reservoir simulation. The workflow identifies the key “main” coal seams and evaluates various co-production layer combinations to maximize gas recovery while minimizing negative interference. We applied this method to a CBM well (LC-C2) in the Western Guizhou–Eastern Yunnan region, which penetrates three discrete CBM pressure systems. In the case study, single-layer simulations first revealed that one seam (No. 7 + 8) contributed over 30% of the total gas potential, with a few other seams (e.g., No. 18, 13, 4, 16) providing moderate contributions and many seams yielding negligible gas. Guided by these results, we simulated five commingling scenarios of increasing complexity. The optimal scenario was to co-produce the seams from the two higher-pressure systems (a total of six seams) while excluding the low-pressure shallow seams. This optimal six-seam configuration achieved a 10-year cumulative gas production of approximately 2.53 × 106 m3 (about 700 m3/day average)—roughly 75% higher than producing the main seam alone, and even about 15% greater than a scenario involving all available seams. In contrast, including all three pressure systems (ten seams) led to interference effects where the high-pressure seams dominated flow and the low-pressure seams contributed little, resulting in lower overall recovery. The findings demonstrate that more is not always better in multi-seam CBM production. By intelligently selecting a moderate number of compatible seams for co-production, the reservoir’s gas can be extracted more efficiently. The proposed quantitative optimization approach provides a practical tool for designing multi-seam CBM wells and can be broadly applied to similar geologically compartmentalized reservoirs.
Keywords: coalbed methane (CBM); commingled production; numerical simulation; pressure compartmentalization; production optimization coalbed methane (CBM); commingled production; numerical simulation; pressure compartmentalization; production optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quan, F.; Li, H.; Lu, W.; Song, T.; Wang, H.; Qin, Z. Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China. Processes 2025, 13, 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103280

AMA Style

Quan F, Li H, Lu W, Song T, Wang H, Qin Z. Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China. Processes. 2025; 13(10):3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quan, Fangkai, Hongji Li, Wei Lu, Tao Song, Haiying Wang, and Zhengyuan Qin. 2025. "Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China" Processes 13, no. 10: 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103280

APA Style

Quan, F., Li, H., Lu, W., Song, T., Wang, H., & Qin, Z. (2025). Optimization of Production Layer Combinations in Multi-Superposed Coalbed Methane Systems Using Numerical Simulation: A Case Study from Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, China. Processes, 13(10), 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop