Review Reports
- Mohieddine Jelali* and
- Konstantinos Papadopoulos
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsComments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Minor editing is required.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
please see the attachment.
Yours sincerely,
Mohieddine Jelali
Konstantinos Papadopoulos
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThis paper deals with the exploitation of microwave/terahertz imaging technology for food quality control and assessment.Emphasis is placed on the (inline) inspection of wrapped/packaged food, such as chocolates, cookies, pastries, cakes, and similar confectionery products, moving along production conveyor belts.It describes in detail the state of development and the way forward.
I have the following comments on changes to this paper:
1. In the figure1,you can make some changes to the figure to emphasize:Microwaves (µW)、Millimetre waves (mmW)、Terahertz (THz) waves,I can't tell which part you're emphasizing from Figure 1.This figure needs to be refined.
2. Reasonably cite the content of the literature, and it is not advisable to pile up the literature in large volumes, and you must have your own opinions.
Comments on the Quality of English Language1. The 2 line in Abstract:change “an increased attention”to”increased attention”.
2. The 283 line:change “scanning”to”to scan”.
3. The 548 line:”for example”The grammar here is used incorrectly.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
please see the attachment.
Yours sincerely,
Mohieddine Jelali
Konstantinos Papadopoulos
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsVery well written review article.
This is a good reference paper.
Comments on the Quality of English Language- please review line 532 ("many" should replace "much")
- In the conclusion, "chapter" should be replaced by "section"
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
please see the attachment.
Yours sincerely,
Mohieddine Jelali
Konstantinos Papadopoulos
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsAuthors have revised the manuscript considering the suggestions/comments of the reviewers. In my opinion, it can be accepted for publication.