Next Article in Journal
Rate Transient Analysis for Fractured Wells in Inter-Salt Shale Oil Reservoirs Considering Threshold Pressure Gradient
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on the Harmless Treatment of Barium Slag Using Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum
Previous Article in Journal
Data-Driven Kinematic Model for the End-Effector Pose Control of a Manipulator Robot
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma Gasification of a Simulated Low-Level Radioactive Waste: Co, Cs, Sr, and Ce Retention Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Coffee-Waste-Based ZnCl2 Activated Carbon in High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes: Impact of Graphitization, Surface Morphology, Porosity and Conductivity

1
Department of Physics, An-Najah National University, Nablus P400, Palestine
2
Department of Chemistry, An-Najah National University, Nablus P400, Palestine
3
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
4
Hydrogen Research Department, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(12), 2832; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122832
Submission received: 13 November 2024 / Revised: 2 December 2024 / Accepted: 6 December 2024 / Published: 10 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Wastewater and Solid Waste Treatment Processes)

Abstract

:
Activated carbon (AC) electrodes from coffee waste (CW) were earlier assessed in supercapacitors but showed lower supercapacitor performance in terms of specific capacity (Cs), specific power (Ps) or both, compared to other biowastes. This work describes how CW-based AC electrode performance may be improved if carefully prepared. Careful processing yields higher graphitization, carbon content (aromaticity), conductivity and porosity free of any residues. Thus, AC electrodes will exhibit higher Cs and Ps simultaneously. CW was first pyrolyzed (CPyrol) and then chemically activated by ZnCl2 (ACChem). Both materials were characterized using SEM, TEM, BET, FT-IR spectra, Raman spectra and XRD. The ACChem exhibited much higher graphitization, crystallinity, specific surface area (SSA), porosity and conductivity. From cyclic voltammetry, the ACChem electrode exhibited a Cs of 261 F/g, an energy density of 18.3 Wh/kg and a Ps of 360 W/kg at 0.33 A/g. From galvanostatic charge–discharge, there was a stable Cs of 150 F/g at 0.33 A/g over 5000 charge–discharge cycles. From electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, the Cs was ~180 F/g, with a low equivalent series resistance (ESR) of 0.56 Ω at a frequency of 0.01 Hz, compared to the literature. The ACChem electrode was superior to the CPyrol electrode and to earlier CW-based AC counterparts, with much lower resistance. Moreover, the electrode competed with other biowaste-based electrodes.

1. Introduction

Many reasons stand behind considering biowastes as sources of carbon materials in modern devices. Firstly, recycling biowastes prevents widespread environmental contamination from random dumping. Secondly, the produced carbon is useful as a low-cost and safe material for electronic devices. Thirdly, the strategy minimizes dependence on the hazardous fossil sources [1,2,3]. A promising application area is supercapacitor (SC) technology for energy storage. The SC is a device with two high specific surface area (SSA) electrodes, a separator and an electrolyte solution. Compared to conventional capacitors, SCs have much higher capacitance [4,5,6,7]. With potentially high power yields, SCs are considered in various electronic devices, and specifically electric cars, competitively with batteries [5,8].
The Ragone plots describe how SCs are at intermediary positions between conventional capacitors and batteries [9]. The plots combine energy density with power density outputs for various energy-storage devices, including fuel cells, batteries and SCs, together with conventional capacitors. For a given device, lowering the equivalent series resistance (ESR) increases the energy density, while raising the voltage window increases the power density values [9,10,11].
Improved energy-density storage devices are continuously needed to meet expanding demands for modern electronic devices. As in batteries, electrochemical capacitors (ECs) attract special attention by virtue of their high storage density, low-temperature performance and multiple charge–discharge cycles. Unlike batteries and fuel cells, SCs involve no real chemical reactions and function for prolonged life cycles [12], which is one virtue. SCs with both high energy density (like batteries) and high power density (like capacitors) at the same time are highly needed. SC research is thus active in achieving this feature.
In SCs, very high specific surface area (SSA) electrodes with high conductivity are necessary. The need for carbon materials in SCs is thus justified. Activated carbons (ACs) are conducting materials that are thermally and chemically stable and can have large SSAs with high micropore volumes. With high adsorption capacity and tunable pore structures [13], ACs are being considered in various energy-storage devices such as supercapacitors [14,15].
AC characteristics (surface, pore structure and adsorption capacity) are affected by preparation and activation methods. Two types of activation are widely known: physical activation and chemical activation. In chemical activation, impregnation with a suitable material is used. Examples of widely used chemical activating agents are KOH, NaOH, K2CO3, ZnCl2 or H3PO4. The activating agents, which are used in combination with mild physical processing, ensure pyrolytic decomposition of the precursor material at lower processing temperatures, with less tar formation [16,17]. In physical activation, the precursor material is partially gasified under inert atmospheres at a high temperature and then activated with oxidizing gases such as steam, air, carbon dioxide or mixed gases [17].
Chemical activation is a simple process and is advantageous in terms of processing time, low temperature and high yield with high porosity. However, physical activation is still preferable on a commercial scale due to the higher control of characteristics and simplicity [18].
High-temperature pyrolysis can be coupled with poro-genic processes using NaOH or KOH activation. Hazelnut shell hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) was studied by three various poro-genic methods, namely simple heat treatment, KOH activation and MgO templating. Better electrochemical characteristics (with higher SSA and effective micro-porosity) were reported in anode materials for energy storage [18,19]. Ginkgo waste-based ACs, activated by KOH, were reported by Jiang et al. [20]. The effect of pre-carbonized stuff and the KOH ratio was studied. SSA values of 1829.7 m2/g were observed for samples activated with KOH. The AC showed a specific capacitance (Cs) of 365 F/g at a scan rate of 2 mV/s. KOH was also used as an activating agent at 600–900 °C for 2 h and yielded N-doped AC with a large SSA of 3401 m2/g, a high Cs of 346 F/g and a high-capacity stability (~98% for 5000 cycles at 1 A/g), but a low energy density of 22.4 Wh/kg (at 0.5 A/g) [21].
Chestnut shell-based AC, activated with ZnCl2, exhibited an SSA of up to 1987 m2/g with a Cs 105.4 F/g [22]. Hong et al. used K2SO4 to activate chestnut shell-based AC with an SSA of 1412 m2/g and a Cs of 265 F/g, but at a low current density (0.1 A/g) [21].
KHCO3 was described as activating AC from chestnut shells for supercapacitor electrodes [21]. Biochar activation with KHCO3 yielded porous carbons with a high SSA of 2298 m2/g and a Cs of 387 F/g (at 2 A/g) with high stability (~99% after 10,000 cycles at 30 A/g) [21,23]. N-doped porous carbon from edible Chinese water-chestnut corms was also reported [22]. Melamine also activated chestnut shell-based carbons [23]. The AC exhibited current density (0.5 A/g), Cs (402.8 F/g) and SSA (691.8 m2/g). The literature thus showed the possibility of producing chemically activated carbons for high-performance supercapacitors from various biowastes. Depending on their regional agricultural resources and biowastes, researchers tend to focus their study attention. For this reason, in many regions, people have conducted their studies on chestnuts, hazelnuts and other nuts.
Other sources are globally spread, such as coffee wastes (CWs), since coffee is widely used in many places. It is reported that in the early 2020s, more than 5 million tons of coffee was globally consumed [24]. More recently, the amounts of CW were reported to exceed 8 million tons [25]. ACs with high surface areas and pore volumes from CW were prepared and used for contaminant removal by adsorption [24,26,27,28].
CWs thus deserve to be studied. CW-based electrodes were reported in supercapacitors. A flexible supercapacitor with a Cs value of 139 F/g (at 0.5 A/g), a specific energy of 12.5 W h/kg and a specific power (Ps) of 202 W/kg was prepared from nitrogen 8%-doped AC. The KOH activation was conducted at various temperatures. The supercapacitor functioned for more than 5000 cycles with ~90% capacitance retention [29]. However, the results showed lower Cs values than ACs from other waste materials. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) showed high resistance (ESR) values as well. Chiu et al. prepared AC in one combined process (physical and chemical activations) with various activating agents, KOH being the best. Only a relatively low Cs of 105.3 F/g was observed [30]. M Biegun et al. used hydrothermal acidic hydrolysis, then the KOH activation at 800 °C, to activate coffee waste and obtained a high SSA of ~2900 m2/g. Using a liquid ionic electrolyte, the highest Cs was 178 F/g at 50 A/g, based on the galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) method [31], still with lower performance than other waste-based materials described above. Omkar Khadka et al. recently prepared supercapacitor electrodes from coffee wastes, first by chemical activation with a ZnCl2 1:1 ratio, then by physical activation at 700 °C, and observed a relatively low Cs of only 113.8 F/g at 1 A/g [32]. In a recent review, Davidraj et al. reported the possibility of food waste materials to produce electrodes for energy-storage devices [33]. The report cited a number of papers using CWs in supercapacitor electrodes. In another more recent review, Pagett et al. described CWs in supercapacitor electrodes [25]. With the exception of one 2008 report that showed high Cs [34], all other more recent reports showed Cs values of less than 160 F/g [25]. From the literature, it can be noted that the AC prepared from coffee wastes showed lower performance than other ACs prepared from other sources, as summarized in Table 1.
Instead of using the highly corrosive KOH activating agent reported earlier, the environmentally friendly and low-cost ZnCl2 is used here. The choice for ZnCl2 is based on its eco-friendliness, acidic nature and high performance, as described earlier [37], where it yielded ACs with high surface areas and high adsorption capacity. ZnCl2 was described in activating coffee waste for supercapacitor electrodes with a Cs of 134 F/g at 1 A/g using organic solvents, with high equivalent series resistance (ESR) of more than 20 Ω [38]. In a recent study [39], ZnCl2 was described in CW-based activated carbon (AC). Based on cyclic voltammetry, the AC showed a high Cs of 250 F/g but at a low scan rate of 1 mV/s. At a scan rate of 5 mV/s, the Cs value was lowered to ~195 F/g, which means the electrode still needs further improvement. From charge–discharge, the study also showed a high Cs value of ~200 F/g at a current density of 1 A cm−2. However, the study did not show the results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and thus did not display the ESR values that are important in Ps determination.
In CW-based ACs, no correlation between important characteristics (such as surface area, porosity, graphitization and morphology) with electrode Cs and Ps was reported. As CW is a promising source of AC, more studies are needed to increase the CW-based supercapacitor performance. In supercapacitor electrode technology, high values of both Cs and Ps are necessary. Both features can be improved by tailoring the properties of the electrode material at its microscale. For instance, to achieve high Cs, the electrode material must have high SSA and porosity. High total pore volume, especially at the microscale, is necessary to uptake higher charges. Moreover, the electrode must exhibit relatively high conductivity to be able to conduct current at the AC/metal collector interface in order to exhibit a high Ps. To achieve this, the AC electrode material must have a higher carbon content (carbon purity) with high aromaticity. By virtue of C=C conjugated bonds, in the aromatic AC framework, the electrode may conduct current. Therefore, AC electrodes with higher carbon content and crystallinity are necessary to achieve these characteristics.
On the other hand, the pore availability to charges is very critical in superconductor electrodes. Therefore, special attention should be paid to removing all traces of organic materials and residues, even before chemical activation, to guarantee that the resulting ACs have more open pore structures.
All these assumptions will be tested. The goal here is three-fold: First, to produce AC electrodes from CW with high SSA and micro-porosity that are free of any residues of organic stuff and have a high Cs. Second, to produce highly graphitized AC electrodes with high carbon content, aromaticity and conductivity in order to exhibit high Ps values. Again, the AC must be free of any organic residues to improve interparticle charge transfer for increased conductivity. Third, to correlate between AC electrode Cs and Ps (measured from galvanostatic charge–discharge, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectra) with AC material and other characteristics. SSA and porosity will be examined using the BET method.
Crystallinity will be examined using X-ray crystallography. Morphology will be studied using scanning electronic microscopy. Graphitization, carbon content and purity, functional groups and aromaticity will be examined by Raman spectra, FT-IR spectra and energy dispersive X-ray electron spectra. The study will be performed on an AC electrode in comparison with another counterpart prepared from CW pyrolysis.
Extra steps will be followed in preparing the pyrolyzed carbon and the AC materials, as described in Experimental Section 2. The impact of these steps on the AC characteristics and supercapacitor performance will be assessed here by comparison with the literature electrodes in Section 3.
This comprehensive study approach to CW carbon materials was not reported, to our knowledge. The present study thus aims to produce an AC electrode from CW with higher Cs, higher Ps and lower ESR than earlier described systems.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Organic solvents, such as acetone, bases and acids, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) in pure forms. The glass fiber separator (-M 5V5) was purchased from Alter-Lab. Coffee waste was taken from freshly used Turkish coffee drinks (Arabica type). The coffee beans were brown roasted at ~240 °C for ~20 min. The roasted beans were then ground on a Ditting shop grinder at super-grade 0.1 mm in diameter. The coffee drink was then processed according to Turkish coffee drink protocols and boiled for a few minutes. The resulting CW was isolated and stored in a refrigerator for processing.

2.2. Equipment

A hydraulic press (Shimadzu, Singapore), equipped with a pressure gauge, was used to make AC disks. The sample was pressed at 7 tons. The value was based on earlier recommendations [37].
A standard Teflon Swagelok cell, 10 mm in diameter with stainless steel electrodes, was used for supercapacitor testing. The cell was connected to the potentiostat/galvanostat (VoltaLabPGZ402). The working electrode was connected to one side, while the counter and the reference electrodes were together connected to the other side. The internal reference cell was used as a reference. The VoltaMaster 4 software was used for electrochemical measurements. Solid-state Fourier transform infra-red spectra were measured on a Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA) machine (ASB1200315-Nicolet 5 FT-IR Spectrometer).
AC morphology and surface structure were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on a (Hitachi-S-4800 Field-Emission machine, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) was measured on a JEM-ARM200F system. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) was measured on Micromeritics-3Flex 3500 equipment. X-ray diffraction patterns were measured on a PAN-alyticalX’Pert-PRO X-ray diffractometer (Spectric Company, London, UK), using Cu Kα as a source. Raman spectra were measured on OlympusBX41M equipment. SEM, XRD, TEM, BET, XPS and Raman spectra were all measured in the labs of the KIER, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

2.3. Carbon Material Preparation

The CW material described above was treated by two methods, namely pyrolysis only and chemical activation.
  • Thermal (pyrolytic) treatment (CPyrol)
Pre-dried Arabic coffee waste (200 g) was soaked in distilled water (800 mL) for 24 h and rinsed. The solid was again soaked in hot distilled water (800 mL) for 24 h, filtered, rinsed with ethanol, spread on a tray and dried in an oven at 200 °C for 3 h, then left at 50 °C for 24 h. The remaining solid waste was left to dry at room temperature for 24 h, then heated in an oven at 70 °C for 12 h. The extra steps were performed to remove all soluble coffee ingredients, including any possible organic oils or residues.
The resulting solid was then heated at 800 °C for 2 h under a flow of inert ultrapure N2. The solid was kept to cool in the oven for 24 under N2. The resulting CPyrol was stored inside a desiccator. The net mass for the CPyrol was ~154 g, with a yield percent of 77%.
  • Chemical activation (ACChem)
A CPyrol sample (100 g) was taken and magnetically stirred with ZnCl2(s) (in a 1:1 mass ratio) for 24 h at 60 °C. The solid mixture was left at room temperature for 24 h and then oven-dried for 7 h at 70 °C. The solid mixture was heated at 800 °C for 2 h. The resulting solid was cooled and soaked again in water for 24 h to remove any floating materials. The solid was then filtered, rinsed with water and dried at room temperature for 48 h. The resulting ACChem was stored in a desiccator for further use. The net mass for ACChem was ~78 g, with a yield of 78%. In both cases, no ash was observed, indicating that gasification was the main reason for the loss.

2.4. Carbon Disc Electrode Preparation

A sample from each carbon was ball-milled to fine powder with Agat mortar for 10 min. The carbon material was mixed with PVDF polymer in a 93:7% ratio and was magnetically stirred with acetone (15 mL) to allow polymer diffusion inside the carbon. The mixture, which became fluidic muddy, was then sonicated at 35 °C for 20 min inside a bath and then left at room temperature for 24 h to evaporate off the acetone. The resulting solid/polymer cake (with polymer in and out) was milled with a mortar to a fine powder. The excessive polymer tissue, which resulted on the sides, was peeled off with a tongue. The remaining solid was collected and oven-dried at 70 °C for 2 h. The carbon powder (0.03 g) was then used to make electrode discs, which were pressed in a mold under hydraulic pressure of 7 tons. The carbon disc diameter was 10 mm, and the disc thickness was ~0.19 mm.

2.5. Electrochemical Methods

Electrochemical characteristics for both carbon materials were examined by various methods, namely galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD), cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). A Swagelok cell, described above, was used in the electrochemical studies. One disc was loaded as a coating layer on one stainless steel electrode. A fiberglass disk separator (with a diameter of 10 mm) was immersed in KOH electrolytic solution (6 M) for 5 min and was then carefully taken by tongues and firmly stacked on the carbon electrode as a coating. The other carbon disc was stacked onto the separator. Then, the cell was firmly assembled to prevent gaps and bubbles between electrodes and to disallow any cell component movements. The assembled Swagelok cell electrodes were connected with the PGZ 402 Potentiostat/Galvanostat in the two-terminal mode, as described above. The VoltaMaster 4 software was utilized in data collection. The CV measurements were performed for each electrode in the potential range of 0.0–1.0 V at various scan rates.
The GCD data were measured at various current densities. The current density was switched between positive values (for charging) and negative values (for discharging). The results were acquired and analyzed using Origin software (Version 4.0.9.0—13 November 2023) or Excel (2010).

3. Results

3.1. Carbon Disc Characterization

-
Carbon Morphology
Figure 1 shows SEM micrographs for both carbon materials in pressed disc forms. The CPyrol and ACChem materials exhibited different surface morphologies. The ACChem is more porous than the CPyrol. This is due to the chemical activation, which further affects the carbon surface, in addition to heating, as reported earlier [40,41]. As stated above, the acidic ZnCl2 activating agent interacts with the carbon matrix and makes it more porous.
In Figure 2, TEM micrographs for both carbon materials are shown. In each case, white dots can be observed, indicating pores. The ACChem was more porous, with higher homogeneity, than CPyrol. A closer look at Figure 2c shows that the ACChem involves planes similar to graphene, which are normally planes present in graphite. The interplanar distances are ~0.334 nm, which resembles the earlier literature [42]. This indicates that ACChem has high graphitization and carbon purity, as confirmed by other methods as described below.
-
Carbon material porosity
The porosity for the two carbon materials was measured using the BET method. Porosity involves SSAs, pore size distributions (PSDs) and total specific pore volumes. Adsorption/desorption isotherms were measured for both carbon materials in pressed disc forms. The results are summarized in Figure 3a. The figure indicates that at higher relative pressure, the amount of gas that entered the pores increased until all pores were occupied at equilibrium. Naturally, the equilibrium position was pushed to higher adsorption at higher relative pressures.
To understand the effect of electrode material pore size distribution on the Cs, BET analyses were performed (Figure 3a). The isotherms involved small hysteresis loops from high to low pressure ranges. This indicated that the electrodes had both meso- and macro-porosities. Based on IUPAC, the present isotherms are type I [43]. This indicates highly microporous materials. ACChem exhibited higher nitrogen adsorption, even at very low relative pressures (P/P° < 0.01), compared to CPyrol. This indicated the existence of micropores, more profoundly in the former than in the latter. The ACChem is superior to CPyol in terms of SSA, in addition to micro-porosity, as described in Table 2. As the minimal pore sizes for ACChem (0.8 nm) and CPyrol (1.8 nm) are larger than the ionic sizes for both electrolyte ions (K+(hydrated) 0.4 nm, OH(hydrated) 0.38 nm), both activated carbons readily adsorb the ions and may behave as supercapacitors. Since the ACChem had more total micropores than CPyrol, with higher SSA (vide infra), the former carbon should have higher Cs.
The SSA was determined by multiple point BET approach within regions of isotherms, limited by the P/Pº range of 0.0–0.3. Figure 3b summarizes the results. The adsorption volume showed that BET surface areas for CPyrol and ACChem were 458 and 830 m2/g, respectively. The total volume of pores (Vtotal, cm3/g) was calculated by the amount of adsorbed nitrogen at P/P° ≈ 0.9932. All results are summarized in Table 2.
All the above results confirmed the ACChem high porosity and suitability for supercapacitor applications. The increased porosity is due to using the activating agent.
-
Pore size distribution by the BJH method
The method of Brunauer–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method was used to analyze meso- and macro-pores in a wide diameter range of 17–3000 Ả. Figure 4a summarizes the pore size distributions in both carbons. The pore size distributions were in the micro-, meso- and macropore scales. The figure shows that for the present electrodes, the domain of pore sizes was centered in the ranges of (1.8–3.3 nm) for CPyrol and (0.8–2.7 nm) for ACChem. Equation (1) describes the relation between BET surface area and pore size with Cs.
Cs = εA/d
where ε is electrolyte dielectric constant, A is SSA accessible to ions and d is spacing between ions and electrode-pore surface (in nm).
Based on this equation, two methods can be followed to increase supercapacitor charge storage:
-
Improving SSA;
-
Decreasing spacing between electrode surface and ions.
Therefore, higher SSAs and higher meso- and micropores numbers, together, yield higher transport of charges. This consequently leads to higher Cs.
The results showed that, for both present carbons, higher adsorbed gas occurred in the smaller pore size. Small pore sizes were more dominant in the ACChem, as observed from pore size distributions (differential pore volumes) (Figure 4a). The observed ACChem material peaks were distributed within the pore size range of 1.0–4.0 nm. Thus, micropores were dominant in the ACChem, with higher adsorption at smaller diameter micropores. The results justified the high Cs for ACChem, as summarized in Table 2.
As per CPyrol, the plot showed a single peak at 3.7 nm. At smaller pore sizes, CPyrol has lower adsorption than the ACChem. The results clearly indicated that the ACChem was more microporous than the other counterpart.
-
Pore size distribution by the (HJ) t-plot
The micropore volume and surface area (Smicro, m2/g) were investigated by the Harkins–Jurat plot. The amount of adsorbed N2 for a given P/P° range was plotted against pore thickness (t). The results are summarized in Figure 4b,c and Table 2. From the figures, the present electrodes involved high micro-surface areas of 557 and 385 m2/g for ACChem and CPyrol electrodes, respectively. This justified the high Cs for ACChem, as described below.
-
X-ray patterns
The XRD pattern is presented in Figure 5a. Both CPyrol and ACChem exhibited a peak at 2θ = ~24°. This is consistent with the earlier literature [41]. However, as both materials are amorphous, broad and low diffraction peaks for the (002) signals were observed. The peak for ACChem was sharper than for CPyrol, which indicated that the former was more crystalline. This means that the former had more carbon content than the latter, as described below. The especially broad peak for the CPyrol is a result of the presence of additional phases, as described in the literature [42]. The XRD pattern occurred at a slightly lower 2θ value by adding KOH to activated carbon from oil palm fruits [43]. In the present study, no clear shifting is observed due to overlap.
Another broad peak in the range of 2θ = 40–50° can also be observed more obviously for ACChem than for CPyrol. The ACChem thus showed more resemblance to earlier chemically activated carbons [44]. The XRD patterns indicated that the ACChem had higher graphitization, crystallinity and porosity.
-
Elemental analysis
For both CPyrol and ACChem, elemental analyses were performed by the EDS, as described in Supplementary Figure S1a,b. Table 3 summarizes the results.
For ACChem, the atom percentage for carbon was 93%, while for CPyrol, it was only 63.20%. So, more carbon appears in ACChem, which is a virtue for this material. The results are also consistent with TEM results where the ACChem involves graphene planes in the graphite. The EDS results were also consistent with the XRD results, in the sense that ACChem material had higher graphitization; vide infra.
-
FT-IR spectra:
Solid-state FT-IR spectra were measured for both carbon materials, as described in Figure 5b. Both carbon materials are free of significant water amounts, as both did not show strong characteristic bands at ~3500 cm−1. This also indicated the absence of the O-H bonds that exhibit a broad band due to H-bonding when the groups are in close proximity. CPyrol showed a clear band at ~2900 cm−1 due to C-H bond stretching in (-CH2) and in (-CH3) groups [44,45]. The same band was not clearly observed in ACChem, which indicated low H-content in the solid, as earlier reported for dry graphite [46,47]. The results indicated that the ACChem had less hydrogen and more carbon than CPyrol. Naturally, ACChem had higher graphization and carbon purity with a higher chance of C=C formation than its counterpart. This was further evidenced by the -C=C- band at ~1600 cm−1, typical for aromatic systems [48], being clearer and stronger in ACChem. Moreover, the ~1700 cm−1 band, associated with the C=O bond in ketones, aldehydes and carboxylic acids [45], was clearly observed in CPyrol but not in ACChem.
The FT-IR spectra therefore confirmed the higher graphitization and carbon purity in ACChem compared to the CPyrol counterpart. With higher graphitization, the carbon material was able to assume a more aromatic structure, carbon purity and higher conductivity, in congruence with the elemental analysis in Table 3. These results were further corroborated by the Raman spectra described below.
-
Raman spectra
Figure 5c below summarizes the Raman spectra for CPyrol and ACChem. The ACChem exhibited higher homogeneity than CPyrol. Each carbon material exhibited two sharp peaks at 1360 cm−1 (for the D peak) and 1590 (for the G peak). Comparison between the two spectra indicated that the ratio between the D-peak intensity (ID) and the G-peak intensity (IG) was 0.7 for ACChem compared to 0.8 for CPyrol. A lower ID/IG ratio means higher graphitization in carbon materials, as described earlier [49,50]. Therefore, the ACChem here had more graphitization and carbon purity than the CPyrol. This result corroborated the XRD and EDS results discussed above in the sense that the former has more C content than the latter. The Raman spectra also corroborated the FT-IR spectral findings discussed above.
It should be noted that higher graphitization is a favored feature in ACs. Researchers tend to increase graphitization by increasing temperature [51]. To increase carbon content with higher SSA, porosity and larger total pore volume, chemical activators are needed [52,53].

3.2. Supercapacitor Testing

As described above, the ACChem electrode was singled out for further in-depth electrochemical study unless otherwise stated. It is customary to single out ACs produced with activating agents in electrochemical studies [30,54]. However, for the CPyrol, the electrochemical results are displayed in the Supplementary Data, Figures S2–S4, for comparison purposes. Electrochemical results for ACChem, including CV, GCD and EIS, are described here, using KOH (6.0 M) as an electrolyte.
-
CV
CV is a major tool for studying Cs. Cyclic voltammograms were measured in the range (0.0 to 1.0 V) at various scan rates (5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 mV/s) for the ACChem electrode (Figure 6). Figure 6a displays CVs measured at different scan rates, while Figure 6b displays CVs at one low scan rate (5 mV/s) only. Each CV plot exhibited a semi-rectangular shape, with no peaks and with a highly reversible charge–discharge process. The electrode thus behaved as an electronic double-layer capacitor [4,8,55,56,57]. The Cs values (in F/g) were calculated from CV plots using Equation (2).
C s = 2 x ( q a + q c ) m Δ V
where m is the electrode-active material (g) and ΔV is the voltage window (V), while qa is the anodic charge and qc is the cathodic charge (in C).
High reversibility for ACChem electrodes at different scan rates and high response (in charging/discharging) were due to high conductivity, as described in other systems [58,59,60]. Based on Figure 6a,b, the Cs values for ACChem were plotted vs. scan rates. Figure 6c indicated that Cs decreased at higher scan rates. Table 4 summarizes the results. The table shows that the present ACChem electrode was superior to earlier coffee waste-based electrodes in terms of Cs value.
Typically, high Cs is associated with lower scan rates. In ACChem, the same behavior was observed due to enough time available for ions to penetrate through micropores (of less than 2 nm). At higher scan rate settings, only larger pores (2–50 nm) can uptake ions and contribute to capacitance. That is due to electrolyte diffusion rate differences in the pores with various sizes. It may also result from network connections between smaller and larger pores [60,61,62].
The high Cs of ACChem was partly due to its high SSA and microporous surface. This increased the number of areas available for electrolyte-ion storage within the numerous small pores. Other factors, such as conductivity, may also have had an influence, as described below. Compared with the CPyrol electrode in Figure S2, the ACChem electrode exhibited a much higher value.
The increased current density peak with a higher scan rate was due to higher ion mobility. This was associated with high concentrations that diffuse in close proximity to electrode surfaces [63,64].
Table 4. Summary of Cs values obtained at various scan rates for ACChem electrode compared to literature CW-based electrodes.
Table 4. Summary of Cs values obtained at various scan rates for ACChem electrode compared to literature CW-based electrodes.
Scan Rate Setting (mV/s)This Work
Cs Values (F/g)
Literature
Cs Values (F/g)
1--150 [65]
250 [39]
5261109 [32]
195 [39]
10220101 [32]
20174130 [65]
90 [32]
50110100 [65]
1006947 [32]
20045--
-
GCD
The supercapacitor performance can be further tested and verified by the GCD method (Figure 7). The ACChem electrode was charged and discharged galvostatically here, within a potential range of 0.0–1.0 V, at various constant discharge current density values (0.33, 0.67, 1.67, 3.3 and 5.0 A g−1). These current density values were not arbitrarily chosen. Firstly, they spanned a variety of high and low values. At much higher values, the Cs normally become too small, while at much lower current density values, the Cs will increase unrealistically. Secondly, the chosen current density range was based on the current density values observed in CV plots of Figure 6, as extracted from Equation (2).
Figure 7a summarizes the potential (V) vs. time (s) plots, showing the charge and discharge processes. A potential drop (VIR) was observed in the discharge after the maximum potential value was reached. From Figure 7a, the potential drops occurred in the discharge processes. The potential drop values were 0.064, 0.134, 0.297, 0.66 and 0.76 V at the above current density values, respectively. The Cs values from the GCD curves were estimated using Equation (3) [12], as summarized in Table 5.
C s = 2 × I d V d t × M = 2 × I d V / d t × M
where dv/dt is the slope for the linear-discharge curve, I is the discharge current (A) and M is the total mass (g) for the electrode.
The values for equivalent series resistance (ESR) from the GCD method, described in Table 5, can be evaluated by Equation (4). The ESR values were within a narrow domain, which confirmed the electrode stability at different densities. This is another superior feature of the present electrode.
ESR = VIR/2I
Charge and discharge processes were nearly symmetric, indicating high electrochemical reversibility for the electrode. The small VIR drop in the discharging curves of ACChem implied a small ESR value, which is an essential feature in supercapacitors with favorable power characteristics. The low VIR drop in ACChem is due to its high conductivity, as achieved by ZnCl2 activation. The Cs of ACChem decreased from 150 F/g (0.33 A/g) to 39 F/g (at 5 A/g), as shown in Figure 7b. This is a common supercapacitor behavior that is mainly due to electrolyte-ion diffusion limitations.
At higher currents, the time available for charging/discharging processes decreased due to higher ion mobility. This caused lower Cs, as expected, in congruence with the literature [8,55,66]. Figure 7a shows that at higher current density, a shorter time for charging and discharging was available. Thus, the voltage drop increased at a higher current density, corresponding to the resistance exhibited by the supercapacitor [12,67].
The specific energy and specific power values were calculated using Equations (5) and (6) [68,69].
    E =   C s × Δ V o p 2 / ( 2 × 3.6 )  
P = E × 3600 / Δ t
where Cs value (F/g) is extracted from the discharge curve, ΔVop is the operating voltage range (V) defined as ΔVop = ΔVappl VIR and ΔVappl (=1 V) is the applied voltage used during the charge–discharge process. Δt denotes discharge time (in s), and VIR describes the voltage drop observed in the discharge plot caused by the immediate impact of the charge-to-discharge process transition.
Figure 7c displays the Ragone plot for the electrode. The maximum specific energy was (18.3 Wh/kg) at specific power (360 W/kg) at current density (0.33 A/g). At maximum specific power (1444 W/kg), the specific energy was (6.4 Wh/kg) at current density (1.66 A/g). These values are higher than the literature results for coffee waste electrodes. A recent report [32] showed a specific energy of 4.78 Wh/kg and a specific power of 137 W/kg at 1–5 A/g current densities. The present results confirmed the potential value of the ACChem electrode in future applications, as it combined high specific energy with high specific power together. Again, The ACChem electrode showed higher performance than the CPyrol (Figure S3).
The electrode stability on recycling is depicted in Figure 7d. The plot was constructed at a current density of 0.33 A/g for 5000 cycles and showed only a slight Cs lowering from 149 to 148 F/g. The results depicted the high electrode stability upon charge–discharge cycling, which is an important feature in supercapacitor technology.
-
EIS
To further confirm the above results, EIS was studied (Figure 8). Nyquist plots were constructed for the electrode within the frequency range (0.01–10 × 103 Hz) (Figure 8a). The ESR values indicated looseness inside the supercapacitor. The intercept with the x-axis, at a higher frequency, represented the combined resistance (Rs = 0.48 Ω) value involving electrode material inherent resistance, electrolyte solution ionic resistance and contact resistance at the current collector/electrode interface. The semicircle loop described electrode conductivity, together with its charge transfer resistance (Rct) [70]. The measured Rct here was 0.2 Ω. Higher electrode conductivity normally indicates a smaller semicircle loop. For ACChem, the calculated ESR (Rs + RCT) here was 0.6 Ω. At low frequencies, the vertical line describes the electrode capacitive behaviors. In the present electrode, the Nyquist plot showed a nearly linear behavior, in parallel with the imaginary y-axis, indicating polarized systems. At low frequencies, deviation from vertical behavior to smaller slopes corresponded to higher ionic-diffusion resistance. ACChem EIS results were superior to the CPyrol electrode depicted in Supplementary Figure S4.
Time constants normally divide between the electrode capacitive and resistive regions. This can be determined from the reciprocal of maximum frequency (f0) as t0 = 1/f0. Generally, a low time constant value indicates higher performance, i.e., a supercapacitor that yields a higher power in a shorter time. For the electrode, the knee frequency was 0.08 Hz, and the time constant was 12.5 s. Normally, the time constant value is affected by different factors, such as electrode material conductivity and thickness, together with electrolyte thickness [71]. When the electrode and electrolyte thicknesses are kept the same in the supercapacitors, then the time constant is influenced only by the electrode material conductivity.
Supercapacitor Cs values were calculated from EIS using the impedance imaginary component in Equation (7) [67,72].
  C s = 4 × ( 1 / 2   π f z   M )
where f denotes frequency (Hz), z″ is the impedance imaginary component (in Ω) and M is the mass of the electrode (in g).
Figure 8b shows how Cs varied with frequency. For the ACChem electrode, the Cs was 179 F/g at a frequency of 0.01 Hz.
As described above, the Cs for the ACChem electrode was calculated by three methods. The CV study yielded a value of 261 F/g (at a scan rate of 5 mV/s), which is higher than the literature values for coffee waste electrodes. The GCD study yielded a value of 150 F/g at a discharge current of 0.01 A and ESR values in the range of 2.53–3.2 Ω at discharge currents in the range of 0.15–0.01 A. The EIS study showed a value of 179 F/g (at a frequency of 0.01 Hz) with low resistance. All values are superior to earlier reported values, as described above.
All in all, the results indicated that the ACChem electrode exhibited favorable physical characteristics, leading to improved supercapacitor performance. As described above, the chemical activating agent improved all characteristics of the activated carbon in many ways. The solid porosity was improved and yielded higher ion uptake. Graphitization and carbon purity were all improved. The relative crystallinity was improved, along with the electrical conductivity of AC. All these characteristics enabled the present ACChem electrode to exhibit high Cs and Ps at the same time. The present electrode here also exceeded earlier coffee waste-based electrodes, both in Cs and in Ps. One main factor was the careful protocol followed when preparing the ACChem electrode here. Material purity in terms of carbon content allowed the pores to uptake more ions with increased Cs. The carbon purity also allowed higher interparticle charge transfer in the electrode bulk, yielding lower resistance (~0.6 Ω here compared to ~10 Ω elsewhere), which was responsible for higher specific power. By combining high Cs and Ps together, the present electrode was also superior to many electrodes prepared from other biowastes and commercial carbons. This feature makes the electrode a potential candidate for future commercial supercapacitors. Therefore, it is necessary to examine new chemically activating agents that produce activated carbons from coffee and other biowastes. Research is active in these laboratories to further improve coffee waste-based ACs by other methods. Using natural electrolytes is being studied here to minimize environmental impact.

4. Conclusions

Two potentially useful carbon powders were produced from coffee wastes, one by pyrolysis under an inert atmosphere (CPyrol) with no added activators and the other with a ZnCl2 activator (ACChem). The latter exhibited superior characteristics in terms of specific surface area, porosity, carbon content, graphitization and surface morphology. For these reasons, the ACChem electrode was given special attention in assessment as an electrode for supercapacitor purposes. Careful preparation procedures were followed to yield a high-purity carbon electrode that exhibited higher performance than earlier coffee waste-based electrodes in terms of specific capacitance and specific power. The electrode also exhibited low electrochemical series resistance with high stability. With these combined features, the new electrode competes with electrodes produced from other biowastes that showed high performance in the literature. Using new types of chemical activators for coffee waste-based electrodes and using other preparation routes is recommended in future research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr12122832/s1.

Author Contributions

S.M.: Investigation, Writing—Original Draft. A.D.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing—Review and Editing, Validation. H.N.: Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing—Review and Editing. S.H.: Validation, Writing—Review and Editing. H.L.: Investigation (Characterization). H.H.: Investigation (Characterization). T.W.K.: Investigation (Characterization), Supervision, Validation. A.N.A.: Investigation (Characterization). H.S.H.: Supervision, Review Writing and Editing, Validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.M. thanks An-Najah National University for the “thesis funding policy”. T.W.K. acknowledges and thanks “the National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant from the Korean government (MSIT) (# CAP20034-200)”. No special fund was available for this project.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

Results are mostly based on S.M.’s PhD thesis. Help from the technical staff at An-Najah National University laboratories is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The work carries no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, H.; Wang, X. Graphene nanoplate-MnO2 composites for supercapacitors: A controllable oxidation approach. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3185–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cheng, Q.; Tang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, H.; Shinya, N.; Qin, L.-C. Graphene and nanostructured MnO2 composite electrodes for supercapacitors. Carbon 2011, 49, 2917–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, H. Graphene-Based Supercapacitor for Energy Storage Applications. Master’s Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh, A.; Roberts, A.J.; Slade, R.C.T.; Chandra, A. High electrochemical performance in asymmetric supercapasitors using MWCNT/nickel sulfide composite and graphene nanoplates as electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16723–16730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Libich, J.; Máca, J.; Vondrák, J.; Čech, O.; Sedlaříková, M. Supercapacitors: Properties and applications. J. Energy Storage 2018, 17, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vangari, M.; Pryor, T.; Jiang, L. Supercapacitors: Review of materials and fabrication methods. J. Energy Eng. 2013, 139, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lufrano, F.; Staiti, P. Mesoporous carbon materials as electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2010, 5, 903–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, M. Graphene-Based Materials for Supercapacitor Electrodes. Ph.D. Theses, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2013.
  9. Kötz, R.; Carlen, M. Principles and applications of electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2483–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, Q.; Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Seema, A.; Greiner, A.; Hou, H. Supercapacitors based on hybrid carbon nanofibers containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2810–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stoller, M.D.; Ruoff, R.S. Best practice methods for determining an electrode material’s performance for Ultracapacitors. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Basri, N.H.; Dolah, B.N.M.; Farma, R.; Deraman, M.; Awitdrus Talib, I.A.; Omar, R.; Manjunatha, J.G.; Ishak, M.M. Physical and electrochemical properties of supercapacitor electrodes derived from carbon nanotube and biomass carbon. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 257–273. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, W.; Peng, J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, K.; Xia, H.; Zhang, S.; Guo, S.-H. Preparation of activated carbon from coconut shell chars in pilot-scale microwave heating equipment at 60 kW. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arrebola, J.; Caballero, A.; Hernán, L.; Morales, J.; Olivares-Marín, M.; Gómez-Serrano, V. Improving the performance of biomass-derived carbons in Li-ion batteries by controlling the lithium insertion process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, A791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalyani, P.; Anitha, A.; Darchen, A. Obtaining Activated Carbon from Papaya Seeds for Energy Storage Devices. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol. 2015, 4, 110–122. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, W.; Zhang, L.-B.; Peng, J.-H.; Li, N.; Zhu, X.-Y. Preparation of High Surface Area Activated Carbons from Tobacco Stems with K2CO3 Activation Using Microwave Radiation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 27, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hesas, R.H.; Daud, W.M.A.W.; Sahu, J.; Arami-Niya, A. The Effects of A Microwave Heating Method on The Production of Activated Carbon from Agricultural Waste: A Review. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 100, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, K.; Peng, J.; Srinivasakannan, C.; Zhang, L.; Xia, H.; Duan, X. Preparation of High Surface Area Activated Carbon from Coconut Shells Using Microwave Heating. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6163–6169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hwang, J.Y.; Li, M.; El-Kady, M.F.; Kaner, R.B. Next-generation activated carbon supercapacitors: A simple step in electrode processing leads to remarkable gains in energy density. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, L.; Yan, J.; Hao, L.; Xue, R.; Sun, G.; Yi, B. High rate performance activated carbons prepared from ginkgo shells for electrochemical supercapacitors. Carbon 2013, 56, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, P.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Peng, S.; Zou, T.; Wang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. Potassium sulphate (K2SO4) activation of chestnut shell to oxygen-enriched porous carbons with enhanced capacitive properties. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 5385–5396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, L.; Guo, P.; Wang, R.; Ming, L.; Leng, F.; Li, H.; Zhao, X. Electrocapacitive properties of supercapacitors based on hierarchical porous carbons from chestnut shell. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 446, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wan, L.; Li, X.; Li, N.; Xie, M.; Du, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J. Multi-heteroatom-doped hierarchical porous carbon derived from chestnut shell with superior performance in supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 790, 760–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Czerwinska, N.; Giosuè, C.; Matos, I.; Sabbatini, S.; Ruello, M.L.; Bernardo, M. Development of activated carbons derived from wastes: Coffee grounds and olive stones as potential porous materials for air depollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 914, 169898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pagett, M.; Teng, K.S.; Sullivan, G.; Zhang, W. Reusing waste coffee grounds as electrode materials: Recent advances and future opportunities. Glob. Chall. 2023, 7, 2200093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Aouay, F.; Attia, A.; Dammak, L.; Ben Amar, R.; Deratani, A. Activated carbon prepared from waste coffee grounds: Characterization and adsorption properties of dyes. Materials 2024, 17, 3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. AlMarzooqi, A.; Almazrouei, H.; Alhammadi, H. Drugs Removal from Wastewater with Activated Carbon from Coffee Waste. Int. J. Biomed. Res. Pract. 2024, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, C.-H.; Lee, S.-Y.; Park, S.-J. Valorization of waste coffee grounds into microporous carbon materials for CO2 adsorption. Green Chem. 2024, 26, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pandey, K.; Jeong, H.K. Coffee waste-derived porous carbon based flexible supercapacitors. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2022, 809, 140173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chiu, Y.-H.; Lin, L.-Y. Effect of activating agents for producing activated carbon using a facile one-step synthesis with waste coffee grounds for symmetric supercapacitors. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 101, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Biegun, M.; Dymerska, A.; Chen, X.; Mijowska, E. Study of the active carbon from used coffee grounds as the active material for a high-temperature stable supercapacitor with ionic-liquid electrolyte. Materials 2020, 13, 3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khadka, O.; Lawaju, U.; Koju, S.; Rai, R.C.; Nakarmi, M.L.; Joshi, P. Activated carbon derived from coffee waste as supercapacitor electrode material. Sci. World 2024, 17, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davidraj, J.M.; Sathish, C.I.; Benzigar, M.R.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Bahadur, R.; Ramadass, K.; Singh, G.; Yi, J.; Kumar, P. Recent advances in food waste-derived nanoporous carbon for energy storage. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2024, 25, 2357062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rufford, T.E.; Hulicova-Jurcakova, D.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, G.Q. Nanoporous carbon electrode from waste coffee beans for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10, 1594–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Borghei, S.A.; Zare, M.H.; Ahmadi, M.; Sadeghi, M.H.; Marjani, A.; Shirazian, S.; Ghadiri, M. Synthesis of multi-application activated carbon from oak seeds by KOH activation for methylene blue adsorption and electrochemical supercapacitor electrode. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 102958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Said, B.; Bacha, O.; Rahmani, Y.; Harfouche, N.; Kheniche, H.; Zerrouki, D.; Belkhalfa, H.; Henni, A. Activated carbon prepared by hydrothermal pretreatment-assisted chemical activation of date seeds for supercapacitor application. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 155, 111012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zyoud, A.; Nassar, H.N.; El-Hamouz, A.; Hilal, H.S. Solid olive waste in environmental cleanup: Enhanced nitrite ion removal by ZnCl2-activated carbon. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 152, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rufford, T.E.; Hulicova-Jurcakova, D.; Fiset, E.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, G.Q. Double-layer capacitance of waste coffee ground activated carbons in an organic electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 974–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Farma, R.; Julita, R.I.; Apriyani, I.; Awitdrus, A.; Taer, E. ZnCl2-assisted synthesis of coffee bean bagasse-based activated carbon as a stable material for high-performance supercapacitors. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 87, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Williams, P.T.; Reed, A.R. Development of activated carbon pore structure via physical and chemical activation of biomass fibre waste. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Le Van, K.; Luong Thi Thu, T. Preparation of Pore-Size Controllable Activated Carbon from Rice Husk Using Dual Activating Agent and Its Application in Supercapacitor. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 4329609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ruiz, S.; Tamayo, J.A.; Delgado Ospina, J.; Navia Porras, D.P.; Valencia Zapata, M.E.; Mina Hernandez, J.H.; Valencia, C.H.; Zuluaga, F.; Grande Tovar, C.D. Antimicrobial films based on nanocomposites of chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide for biomedical applications. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lowell, S.; Shields, J.E.; Thomas, M.A.; Thommes, M. Characterization of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 16. [Google Scholar]
  44. Puziy, A.; Poddubnaya, O.; Martınez-Alonso, A.; Suárez-Garcıa, F.; Tascón, J. Synthetic carbons activated with phosphoric acid: I. Surface chemistry and ion binding properties. Carbon 2002, 40, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Islam, M.S.; Ang, B.C.; Gharehkhani, S.; Afifi, A.B.M. Adsorption capability of activated carbon synthesized from coconut shell. Carbon Lett. 2016, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gao, Y.; Shi, W.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Lei, Z.; Miao, R. Ultrasonic-assisted production of graphene with high yield in supercritical CO2 and its high electrical conductivity film. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 2839–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anastacio-López, Z.S.; Gonzalez-Calderon, J.; Saldivar-Guerrero, R.; Velasco-Santos, C.; Martínez-Hernández, A.L.; Fierro-González, J.C.; Almendárez-Camarillo, A. Modification of graphene oxide to induce beta crystals in isotactic polypropylene. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abbas, M.; Kaddour, S.; Trari, M. Kinetic and equilibrium studies of cobalt adsorption on apricot stone activated carbon. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Dong, W.; Zhang, L.; Kong, Q.; Wang, W. Efficient adsorption of sulfamethazine onto modified activated carbon: A plausible adsorption mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gupta, G.K.; Sagar, P.; Pandey, S.K.; Srivastava, M.; Singh, A.; Singh, J.; Srivastava, A.; Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, A. In situ fabrication of activated carbon from a bio-waste desmostachya bipinnata for the improved supercapacitor performance. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gupta, A.; Dhakate, S.R.; Pal, P.; Dey, A.; Iyer, P.K.; Singh, D.K. Effect of graphitization temperature on structure and electrical conductivity of poly-acrylonitrile based carbon fibers. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2017, 78, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hernández-Montoya, V.; García-Servin, J.; Bueno-López, J.I. Thermal treatments and activation procedures used in the preparation of activated carbons. In Lignocellulosic Precursors Used in the Synthesis of Activated Carbon-Characterization Techniques and Applications in the Wastewater Treatment; Intech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bergna, D.; Varila, T.; Romar, H.; Lassi, U. Comparison of the properties of activated carbons produced in one-stage and two-stage processes. C 2018, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mohamedkhair, A.K.; Aziz, M.A.; Shah, S.S.; Shaikh, M.N.; Jamil, A.K.; Qasem, M.A.A.; Buliyaminu, I.A.; Yamani, Z.H. Effect of an activating agent on the physicochemical properties and supercapacitor performance of naturally nitrogen-enriched carbon derived from Albizia procera leaves. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6161–6173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Daraghmeh, A.; Hussain, S.; Servera, L.; Xuriguera, E.; Blanes, M.; Ramos, F.; Cornet, A.; Cirera, A. Flexible supercapacitors based on low-cost tape casting of high dense carbon nanofibers. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 025007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, S.Y.; Noh, Y.J.; Yu, J. Thermal conductivity of graphene nanoplatelets filled composites fabricated by solvent-free processing for the excellent filler dispersion and a theoretical approach for the composites containing the geometrized fillers. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 69, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jarrar, S.; Hussain, S.; Haq, A.U.; Bhattacharya, G.; Saadeddin, I.; Servera, L.; Ruiz, J.; Janem, A.; Daraghmeh, A. Binder-free all-carbon composite supercapacitors. Nanotechnology 2024, 35, 305708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Prabaharan, S.; Vimala, R.; Zainal, Z. Nanostructured mesoporous carbon as electrodes for supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2006, 161, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saha, D.; Li, Y.; Bi, Z.; Chen, J.; Keum, J.K.; Hensley, D.K.; Grappe, H.A.; Meyer III, H.M.; Dai, S.; Paranthaman, M.P. Studies on supercapacitor electrode material from activated lignin-derived mesoporous carbon. Langmuir 2014, 30, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Frackowiak, E.; Beguin, F. Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors. Carbon 2001, 39, 937–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lim, C.-S.; Teoh, K.; Liew, C.-W.; Ramesh, S. Electric double layer capacitor based on activated carbon electrode and biodegradable composite polymer electrolyte. Ionics 2014, 20, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meher, S.K.; Justin, P.; Ranga Rao, G. Microwave-mediated synthesis for improved morphology and pseudocapacitance performance of nickel oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Graydon, J.W.; Panjehshahi, M.; Kirk, D.W. Charge redistribution and ionic mobility in the micropores of supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jayawickramage, R.A.P.; Ferraris, J.P. High performance supercapacitors using lignin based electrospun carbon nanofiber electrodes in ionic liquid electrolytes. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 155402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Choi, J.; Zequine, C.; Bhoyate, S.; Lin, W.; Li, X.; Kahol, P.; Gupta, R. Waste coffee management: Deriving high-performance supercapacitors using nitrogen-doped coffee-derived carbon. C 2019, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jarrar, S. Carbon Nanofibers/Graphene Nanoplateletes Composite as Supercapacitor Electrode Using KOH Aqueous Electrolyte. Master’s Thesis, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  67. Daraghmeh, A.; Hussain, S.; Servera, L.; Xuriguera, E.; Cornet, A.; Cirera, A. Impact of binder concentration and pressure on performance of symmetric CNFs based supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 245, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhou, Y.; Jin, P.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y. High-performance symmetric supercapacitors based on carbon nanotube/graphite nanofiber nanocomposites. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ganesh, V.; Pitchumani, S.; Lakshminarayanan, V. New symmetric and asymmetric supercapacitors based on high surface area porous nickel and activated carbon. J. Power Sources 2006, 158, 1523–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gong, Y.; Li, D.; Fu, Q.; Pan, C. Influence of graphene microstructures on electrochemical performance for supercapacitors. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2015, 25, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schütter, C.; Ramirez-Castro, C.; Oljaca, M.; Passerini, S.; Winter, M.; Balducci, A. Activated carbon, carbon blacks and graphene based nanoplatelets as active materials for electrochemical double layer capacitors: A comparative study. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 162, A44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Calvo, E.; Lufrano, F.; Staiti, P.; Brigandì, A.; Arenillas, A.; Menéndez, J. Optimizing the electrochemical performance of aqueous symmetric supercapacitors based on an activated carbon xerogel. J. Power Sources 2013, 241, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM micrographs measured for coffee waste-based carbons as pressed discs. (a,b) For CPyrol; (c,d) for ACChem.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs measured for coffee waste-based carbons as pressed discs. (a,b) For CPyrol; (c,d) for ACChem.
Processes 12 02832 g001
Figure 2. TEM micrographs measured coffee waste-based carbons as pressed discs. (a,b) For CPyrol; (c,d) for ACChem.
Figure 2. TEM micrographs measured coffee waste-based carbons as pressed discs. (a,b) For CPyrol; (c,d) for ACChem.
Processes 12 02832 g002
Figure 3. BET results for ACChem and CPyrol. (a) Adsorption isotherms and (b) 1/[Q(P°/P − 1)] vs. P/P° plots.
Figure 3. BET results for ACChem and CPyrol. (a) Adsorption isotherms and (b) 1/[Q(P°/P − 1)] vs. P/P° plots.
Processes 12 02832 g003
Figure 4. Pore size distribution based on BJH method. For CPyrol and ACChem activated carbons. (a) Plots of pore volume vs. pore size. Plots of quantity adsorbed vs. thickness for (b) CPyrol and (c) ACChem.
Figure 4. Pore size distribution based on BJH method. For CPyrol and ACChem activated carbons. (a) Plots of pore volume vs. pore size. Plots of quantity adsorbed vs. thickness for (b) CPyrol and (c) ACChem.
Processes 12 02832 g004
Figure 5. Characterization results for ACChem and CPyrol by (a) XRD, (b) FT-IR spectra and (c) Raman spectra.
Figure 5. Characterization results for ACChem and CPyrol by (a) XRD, (b) FT-IR spectra and (c) Raman spectra.
Processes 12 02832 g005
Figure 6. CV studies on ACChem electrode. (a) At various scan rates; (b) at low scan rate (5 mV/s); (c) scan rate effect on Cs.
Figure 6. CV studies on ACChem electrode. (a) At various scan rates; (b) at low scan rate (5 mV/s); (c) scan rate effect on Cs.
Processes 12 02832 g006
Figure 7. GCD data for ACChem electrode. (a) Charge–discharge plots vs. time at different current density values. (b) Plots of Cs vs. current density. (c) The Ragone plot of specific power vs. specific energy. (d) Electrode stability with cycling (at 0.33 A/g).
Figure 7. GCD data for ACChem electrode. (a) Charge–discharge plots vs. time at different current density values. (b) Plots of Cs vs. current density. (c) The Ragone plot of specific power vs. specific energy. (d) Electrode stability with cycling (at 0.33 A/g).
Processes 12 02832 g007
Figure 8. EIS data measured for ACChem electrode. (a) Nyquist plot constructed. (b) Cs vs. frequency plot.
Figure 8. EIS data measured for ACChem electrode. (a) Nyquist plot constructed. (b) Cs vs. frequency plot.
Processes 12 02832 g008
Table 1. Some literature reported performance values for electrodes from biowastes.
Table 1. Some literature reported performance values for electrodes from biowastes.
Waste SourceSpec. Capac. (F/g)Spec. Energy
W h/kg
Spec. Power (W/kg)ESR (Ω)Ref.
CW139 (0.5 A/g)12.5202~50[29]
CW
(with ionic liquid)
178 (at 50 A/g)842020.20[31]
CW
KOH
105-216.9350--[30]
CW113 (1 A/g)------[32]
CW<160 [25]
Chestnut265 (0.1 A)------[21]
Chestnut~40326454.5--[23]
Ginkgo365 (scan rate 2 mV/s)----0.2[20]
Oak seeds551 (1 A/g)18.514,9001[35]
Date waste179 (scan rate 5 mV/s)----10[36]
Table 2. BET data measured for CPyrol and ACChem.
Table 2. BET data measured for CPyrol and ACChem.
BET-Based Data
MaterialSBET
(m2/g)
Vtb
(cm3/g)
V0.5–2c mic
(cm3/g)
t-plot
V2–5e
(cm3/g)
BJH
Meso
V > 50
(cm3/g)
Smic
(m2/g)
Smeso
(m2/g)
APS
(nm)
CPyrol 4580.21140.1530.230.0084385731.8–3.3
ACChem8300.410.190.0720.148755751.0–4.0
SBET = BET-based SSA, Smic = micropore surface area, Smeso = mesopore surface area, Vt = total pore volumes, Vmic = micropore volume, Vmeso = mesopore volume, APS is pore size (nm).
Table 3. Summary of elemental analysis results for (a) ACChem and (b) for CPyrol.
Table 3. Summary of elemental analysis results for (a) ACChem and (b) for CPyrol.
aElementCNOSClFe
Atom%93.32.33.90.10.21 × 10−2
Mass%96.60.3 0.10.22 × 10−2
bElementCNOSClFe
Atom%63.21.923.70.041.10.04
Mass% 83.3 4.0 0.1 1.5 0.1
Table 5. Characteristics for ACChem electrode measured at various discharge current values from GCD.
Table 5. Characteristics for ACChem electrode measured at various discharge current values from GCD.
Discharge Current (A/g)0.330.661.663.35.0
VIR (V)0.0640.1340.2970.6600.760
ESR (Ω)3.203.353.003.302.53
Cs (F/g)150141925039
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mukhiemer, S.; Daraghmah, A.; Nassar, H.; Hussain, S.; Lim, H.; Han, H.; Kim, T.W.; Amireh, A.N.; Hilal, H.S. Coffee-Waste-Based ZnCl2 Activated Carbon in High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes: Impact of Graphitization, Surface Morphology, Porosity and Conductivity. Processes 2024, 12, 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122832

AMA Style

Mukhiemer S, Daraghmah A, Nassar H, Hussain S, Lim H, Han H, Kim TW, Amireh AN, Hilal HS. Coffee-Waste-Based ZnCl2 Activated Carbon in High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes: Impact of Graphitization, Surface Morphology, Porosity and Conductivity. Processes. 2024; 12(12):2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122832

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mukhiemer, Sami, Allan Daraghmah, Heba Nassar, Shahzad Hussain, Hanyi Lim, Hyobin Han, Tae Woo Kim, Ameed N. Amireh, and Hikmat S. Hilal. 2024. "Coffee-Waste-Based ZnCl2 Activated Carbon in High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes: Impact of Graphitization, Surface Morphology, Porosity and Conductivity" Processes 12, no. 12: 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122832

APA Style

Mukhiemer, S., Daraghmah, A., Nassar, H., Hussain, S., Lim, H., Han, H., Kim, T. W., Amireh, A. N., & Hilal, H. S. (2024). Coffee-Waste-Based ZnCl2 Activated Carbon in High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes: Impact of Graphitization, Surface Morphology, Porosity and Conductivity. Processes, 12(12), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122832

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop