Next Article in Journal
Simple and Economical Downstream Process Development for Edible Oil Production from Oleaginous Yeast Lipomyces starkeyi
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Stimulants of Medicinal Basidiomycetes Growth Based on Nanoparticles of N-monosubstituted Amino Acid Derivatives of Fullerene C60
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerating Plastic Circularity: A Critical Assessment of the Pathways and Processes to Circular Plastics
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Oven Dehydration on Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activity, Fatty Acids and Mineral Contents of Strawberry Tree Fruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Trends of Nanoencapsulation Strategy for Natural Compounds in the Food Industry

1
Centre de Recherche en Technologies Agroalimentaires, Route de Targa Ouzemmour, Campus Universitaire, Bejaia 06000, Algeria
2
Associated Laboratory in Marine Ecosystems and Aquaculture, Faculty of Nature and Life Sciences Université de Bejaia, Bejaia 06000, Algeria
3
Department of Processes Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Technology Pharmaceutical Laboratory, Université de Bejaia, Bejaia 06000, Algeria
4
Laboratoire des Matériaux Organiques (LMO), Département de Génie des Procédés, Faculté de Technologie, Université de Bejaia, Bejaia 06000, Algeria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(5), 1459; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051459
Submission received: 23 March 2023 / Revised: 4 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023 / Published: 11 May 2023

Abstract

:
Nanotechnology is an emerging field in the food industry that will be important for future industrial production to address rising customer concerns and expectations for natural, nutritious, and healthful food items. People are increasingly motivated to purchase unprocessed food or even high-quality processed foods with minimum chemical additives, highlighting the need to investigate natural alternatives for commercial purposes. Natural compounds are becoming more popular among consumers since they are safer than synthetic chemical additions; however, their most functional compounds are sensitive to the adverse conditions of processing and the digestive tract, impairing their use in food matrices, and industrial-scale applications. Nowadays, nanoencapsulation of natural products can be the most suitable nanotechnology to improve stability, solubility, and bioavailability. The nanostructure can be incorporated into food during production, processing, packaging, and security. Despite the many studies on nanoencapsulation, there is still some misunderstanding about nanoencapsulation systems and preparation techniques. This review aims to categorize different nanoencapsulation techniques (chemical, physicochemical, and physicomechanical), highlight eco-friendly methods, and classify the nanoencapsulation systems as groups (polymer, lipidic and metallic). The current review summarizes recent data on the nanoencapsulation of natural compounds in the food industry that has been published since 2015 until now. Finally, this review presents the challenges and future perspectives on the nanoencapsulation of bioactive compounds in food science.

1. Introduction

Current consumers demand healthier food and are motivated to purchase unprocessed or even high-quality processed foods with minimum chemical additives [1]. The importance of conserving food quality and health benefits without disturbing nutritional value in industrial processes has been a challenge [2]. This high awareness of society to adopt preventive health measures has driven the research to develop a natural compound with bioactive properties that could replace synthetic compounds [3].
Natural products are a broad group of chemical compounds created spontaneously by living organisms such as bacteria, fungi, plants, and aquatic species, each with its own set of biological functions that have various applications, mainly in human and veterinary medicine, food, and agriculture [4,5]. Food-derived bioactive compounds are a varied range of molecules that include lipid-soluble and water-soluble molecules, as well as micro/macromolecules. Among the principal bioactive compounds, we can find vitamins, minerals, flavonoids, phenolic acids, alkaloids, carotenoids, peptides, and fatty acids [6]. The physical and chemical stability of bioactive compounds is dramatically affected by harsh environmental influences during processing and storage, and is altered by physiological conditions within the body during digestion and absorption [7]. Indeed, encapsulation seems to be one of the most promising strategies for protecting fragile materials from adverse conditions or deterioration caused by oxidative conditions [8].
The nanoencapsulation process includes putting solid, liquid, or gaseous components in small receptacles known as capsules. They can be manufactured in nano sizes (<100 nm) employing a variety of materials for the capsule’s membrane creation, with the usage of bio-based components, such as polysaccharides, gums, proteins, lipids, and blends of these, standing out [9,10,11].
Nanoencapsulation in food products offers several benefits, namely, enhancing bioactive compounds’ stability and solubility, preventing deterioration during manufacturing, transport, and storage, masking nasty tastes, obtaining higher activity levels of the nanoencapsulated ingredients, and controlling release [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Nanocapsules may be included in food during production, processing, packaging, and security [14]. Recent reviews have highlighted the potential use of nanoencapsulation of natural compounds in specific areas, such as improving food shelf-life [22], as food additives [23], as antimicrobials [24], or as antioxidants [12,19].
Numerous technologies are available for preparing nanoencapsulation systems. Emulsification, coacervation, inclusion complexation, solvent evaporation, nanoprecipitation, and extraction are the most typical procedures to create nanoencapsulation systems [17,18,19,20,21]. However, no studies have focused on classifying the different nanoencapsulation methods for food components. Furthermore, in studies, there is still misunderstanding between the nanoencapsulation systems and the techniques; for example, in Vasisht’s (2023) study, nanoemulsion was referred to as a system when it is actually a preparation technique [25]. Nevertheless, the literature review revealed no previous studies on eco-friendly nanoencapsulation techniques.
Based on the presented background, this review aims to categorize the various nanoencapsulation techniques (chemical, physicochemical, and physicomechanical) by highlighting eco-friendly techniques and classifying nanoencapsulation systems (polymer, lipidic, and metallic). Additionally, it summarizes recent data on the nanoencapsulation of bioactive compounds in the food industry and food safety, published from 2015 until now. Finally, the review will address the challenges and future perspectives of nanoencapsulation in food science.
During the bibliographic search, the main keywords used were as follows: nanoencapsulation, bioactive compounds, preparation technique, and food industry. The cloud in Figure 1 was obtained by VOSviewer software (version 1.6.19, www.vosviewer.com accessed on 5 May 2023) using the Scopus online database. The size of the circles indicates the frequency of occurrence of each of the keywords, and the curved lines express their links, i.e., co-occurrence. The figure shows that the most frequent keywords were nanotechnology, nanoencapsulation, and bioactive compounds, which follow the main objective of the review.

2. Nano Encapsulations System

The encapsulation of compounds is accomplished by absorption, incorporation, chemical interaction, or dispersion [10,11]. Nowadays, several materials are used as shells of natural compounds, allowing various nanocapsule types [9]. Based on this context, we will classify the nanoencapsulation family’s system and list the materials that are commonly employed in each family.

2.1. Lipids Systems

2.1.1. Liposome

A liposome (Figure 2) is a colloidal unit of phospholipid bilayer vesicles discovered by Bangham et al. in the 1960s [26]. Liposomes are produced from naturally occurring phospholipids with a variety of lipid chains. Phospholipids’ polar regions are found on the surface of liposomes, while their fatty acid chain regions are kept separate from the water by a bilayer hydrophobic nucleus. Nanoliposomes are smaller liposomes having hydrophilic and lipophilic areas that can entrap compounds in lipid bilayers with various lipotropic properties. Nanoliposomes can encapsulate unstable substances such as drugs, vitamins, antioxidants, and antibacterial agents. Based on the number of bilayers in the structure and their size, liposomes may be structurally classified into several categories [27,28,29].

2.1.2. Micelle

Micelles are lipid-containing molecules that condense into spheres in aqueous liquids (colloidal dispersions). Since fatty acids are amphiphilic and feature polar head groups and hydrophobic chains, they can form micelles. A micelle’s nonpolar hydrophobic tail group is found inside and away from water, while its polar head group generates a surface. Roundness and reduced steric hindrance are characteristics of fatty acids that form micelles. The two hydrophobic chains of the fatty acids in glycolipids and phospholipids are too heavy for micelles, which prefer “lipid bilayers”. Micelles form on their own as a result of hydrophobic interactions between molecules [30,31,32].

2.1.3. Solid Lipid Nanoparticles

Colloidal dispersions of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are made up of particles having a lipid core that has hardened and is covered in an emulsifier molecule layer. Therefore, they are structurally comparable to traditional emulsions, with the exception that the droplets in SLNs are entirely crystalline rather than liquid. Typically, SLNs are made by homogenizing an oil phase and a water phase containing a hydrophilic emulsifier at a temperature over the melting point of the lipids. After that, to solidify the created nanoemulsion, it is cooled below the temperature at which the lipid phase crystallizes. At the intended temperature of operation, edible lipids used to manufacture SLNs should be crystalline, but they also need to be able to be melted to integrate the bioactive component. Glyceryl palmitostearate, glyceryl monostearate, glyceryl behenate, palmitic acid, tripalmitin, steric acid, tristearin, and waxes are examples of edible lipids that are used to make SLNs [33,34,35].

2.2. Polymer Systems

2.2.1. Alginate

Alginate is a naturally occurring polymer that may be found predominantly as a structural element in marine brown seaweed (Laminaria hyperborea and Macrocystis pyrifera) and as capsular polysaccharides in several soil bacteria, including Pseudomonas and Azotobacter [36]. Alginate is a linear polysaccharide copolymer made up of two (1-4)-linked mannuronic acid and guluronic acid monomers, and two C5 epimer repeating units (Figure 3). The alginate source affects the quantity and distribution of each unit, and these building blocks control the characteristics and behavior of the polymer. By joining with the monovalent ions, the carboxylic groups in alginate can create salts, such as sodium alginate [37]. Alginate can be synthesized in neutral or charged form, making a wide range of compounds compatible. Alginate may create two different forms of gel, an acid or an ionotropic gel, depending on the pH of the surrounding medium. These gels provide several physicochemical features. A crucial characteristic of alginate and its derivatives is that they gel when exposed to divalent cations, such as calcium, due to an ionic interaction between cations and the carboxyl groups on the polymer’s backbone [38].

2.2.2. Carrageenan

A sulfated polyglactin that includes ester sulfate at a concentration of between 15 and 40% is known as carrageenan. It is composed of units of 3,6-anhydrous-galactose and D-galactose (Figure 3) that alternate and are connected by glycosidic linkages of 1,4 and 1,3. Red seaweed is used to extract carrageenan, which can have positive benefits due to the heterogeneity in its structure and characteristics [39]. Carrageenan molecules’ positions and numbers of sulfate ester groups, together with the amount of 3,6-anhydrous-galactose present, can all affect the biopolymer’s characteristics [40]. Based on their structural differences, carrageenan has been produced in six different types (κ-, ι-, λ-, μ-, ν-, and θ-carrageenan). The most manufactured polymer is κ-carrageenan, which has a high gelling capacity. The massive amount of -OH helps the helix shape develop by creating many hydrogen bonds [41,42].

2.2.3. Chitosan

A naturally occurring polycationic linear polysaccharide produced from chitin, chitosan is ((1 4)-linked 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose) (Figure 3). Chitin is a plentiful, renewable polymer, and its deacetylated derivative, chitosan, is a popular biopolymer [43]. The shells of shrimp, crabs, and other crustaceans contain chitin (-(1 4-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine), which may react with alkaline sodium hydroxide to produce an N-deacetylation product also known as chitosan [44]. The reaction between the amino groups of chitosan and its protonation, which produces NH3+, together with its linear chains, results in the development of electrostatic contacts with molecules containing negatively charged groups. Furthermore, chitosan chains’ inclusion of this functional group and a hydroxyl enables chemical alterations [45].

2.2.4. Cyclodextrin

The enzymatic breakdown of starch by cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase produces cyclodextrins (CDs), torus-shaped oligosaccharides with α-(1,4) connected glucose units (Figure 3). The most prevalent cyclodextrin type is the natural α, β, and γ CDs. CDs have an interior cavity into which molecules can fit. When a molecule enters, it forms an “inclusion complex,” a non-covalent contact involving both the host and the guest molecule. According to reports, the volumes of α-, β-, and γ-CD is 0.174, 0.262, or 0.427 nm3, respectively [46,47].

2.2.5. Pectin

Pectin (Figure 3) is a complex blend of polysaccharides that is acquired from the cell walls of plants; it is polymolecular and polydisperse. Additionally, its composition might change based on the source and the issues experienced in isolation [48]. The main component of pectin, D-galacturonic acid units, is connected in chains by -(1-4) glycosidic linkage. It also has branch areas made of mono-sugars such as D-xylose, D-glucose, L-rhamnose, L-arabinose, or D-galactose. Some of the uronic acid carboxyl groups contained in pectin chains are found naturally as methyl esters, while others are chemically produced by treating other uronic acid carboxyl groups with ammonia [49].

2.2.6. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)

Repeated ethylene glycol units [-(CH2CH2O)n] (Figure 3) make up the hydrophilic polymer known as polyethylene glycol (PEG). Anionic polymerization of ethylene oxide and a hydroxyl group can be used to create it (from water, ethylene glycol, or any diols). PEG can be made through epoxyethane ring-opening polymerization. Different levels of polymerization and activated functional groups can be found in commercially available PEGs [50,51].

2.2.7. Polylactic Acid

The hydrophobic polymer polylactic acid is also known as poly-hydroxy acids, polyesters, or aliphatic polyesters [-(C3H4O2)n] (Figure 3). Lactic acid (LA; 2-hydroxypropanoic acid), a water-soluble monomer that is available in two enantiomeric forms, L-(+)-LA and D-(-)-LA, serves as the basis for its synthesis. When poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and poly-D-lactic acid (PDLA) homopolymers are created from pure L- and D-lactic isomers, respectively, PLA can be generated. On the other hand, poly-D, L-lactic acid (PDLLA) copolymer is generated with a racemic mixture of L- and D-monomers [52,53,54].

2.2.8. Protein

Proteins are polymers made up of amide bonds connecting the 20 natural amino acids. Some amino acids are not generated from ribosomes, such as L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), hydroxyproline (Hyp), dityrosine, and selenomethionine, and these substances are created by posttranslational modifications (Figure 3). These non-ribosomal peptides and amino acids are frequently involved in the structure and function of proteins [55]. Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic contacts, hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals interactions, and metal coordination are noncovalent and weak interactions that help proteins molecularly self-assemble in the range of nanoarchitectures. Although the amplitude of these interactions individually may be negligibly small, when taken together, the overall interactions are considerable and can control the structural conformation of the assembled nanostructures [56].

2.3. Metallic Systems

Metallic nanoparticles (MNPs) have attracted a lot of attention because they may be used to create antimicrobial treatments that have the potential to extend food’s shelf life by preventing bacteria development [57]. These qualities are crucial in applications involving food technology. In this context, MNP-based films, hydrogels, and sensors are gaining popularity as tools in the field of food science. The use of MNPs in food, an intelligent system for food preservation, has been demonstrated in several studies. Additionally, MNP-based sensors are employed to identify food pollutants, namely, microorganisms [58]. Different MNPs, which serve as a vehicle not only for one type of particle, but also as a hybrid system that permits the coupling of natural chemicals with MNPs, may be easily mixed with biopolymers and polymers. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), copper nanoparticles (CuNPs), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) are among the metals utilized in metallic nanoencapsulation. Several physical, chemical, and biological methods have been developed for MNPs fabrication and or synthesis [59].

3. Preparation Methods

Several technologies are available for preparing nanoencapsulation systems. The most common techniques used to produce nanoencapsulation systems include emulsification, coacervation, inclusion complexation, emulsification solvent evaporation, extraction, nanoprecipitation, electro-spraying (spray drying), and electro-spinning [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. These techniques can be categorized into chemical, physicochemical, and physical-mechanical methods, depending on the approach used to form the nanoencapsulation systems.

3.1. Chemical Techniques

Basic chemical processes include emulsions, suspensions, precipitations, sol-gels, and polymerizations. These chemical processes have the benefits of producing nanocapsules with high purity, high uniformity, tiny particle size, narrow size distribution, dispersibility, superior chemical homogeneity, and increased reactivity [60]. In most cases, “emulsification” techniques include first producing an emulsion of a liquid core in a continuous phase by shaking, stirring, homogenizing, or spraying procedures [61]. A shell is created in a second stage by organic polymerization; the emulsion is homogenized using microfluidizers, or the suspension is atomized to allow the solvent to evaporate. The continuous phase begins with a low molecular weight polymer, and as the polymerization progresses, the polymer steadily expands and concurrently entraps the core substance to create the completed nanocapsules. The capsule shell is created at/on the droplet surface by polymerization of the reactive monomers in the “interfacial polymerization” approach [62]. The emulsion is created by dispersing the core material into the continuous phase, where the monomer is dissolved. The mixture is given a co-reactant, which causes the polymerization at the core interface and produces the capsule shell [63]. The “sol-gel” method is a technique that involves making a solution or sol, and gel, then solidifying and heating the organic and inorganic molecules. By creating a colloidal suspension (sol) and then gelating the sol to form a network in a continuous liquid phase, “sol-gel” encapsulation creates inorganic networks (gel) [64]. The “suspension cross-linking” can be used to achieve nanoencapsulation in addition to the chemical methods discussed above. The creation of nanocapsules can also be accomplished using “hydro-thermal methods,” in which chemical reactions occur in water at high temperatures and high pressures, and “oxidation processes,” which directly oxidize and deoxidize raw materials while they are in the liquid phase or quasi-liquid phase [65]. The different chemical methods are summarized in Figure 4.

3.2. Physicochemical Technique

Physical-chemical procedures are those used in nanoencapsulation that integrate chemical and physical techniques. For instance, “phase inversion nanoencapsulation” (PIN) is a technique for biodegradable polymer nanospheres that is particularly effective in encapsulating pharmaceuticals, proteins, or plasmid DNA, without denaturing in capsules: This technique results in the formation of nano- and microspheres by the addition of the active ingredient to a diluted polymer solution, often in methylene chloride, which is then quickly placed into a non-solvent (petroleum) bath without stirring [66]. Simple and complicated coacervation methods are used in phase separation. Except for how the phase separation is achieved, the mechanism of capsule creation is the same in both techniques. A desolvation agent, such as gelatin or ethyl cellulose, is added to the aqueous or organic media in a simple coacervation to facilitate phase separation; in contrast, a complicated coacervation includes complexation between two oppositely charged polymers that are both soluble in an aqueous medium. When forming an aqueous polymer solution (1–10%) at 40–50 °C, where the hydrophobic core material is also dispersed/dissolved, nanoencapsulation by coacervation is accomplished (Figure 5) [67]. Generally, “inclusion complexes” (Figure 5) refer to the supramolecular interaction (Van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonds, or the entropy-driven hydrophobic effect) of the material that has been enclosed into a cavity-bearing complex or shell [68]. Supercritical fluids (Figure 5) constitute the foundation of other physicochemical methods for nanoencapsulation. These procedures include solubilization of the main constituent in a supercritical fluid to disperse it in a matrix material (usually carbon dioxide). The core is enclosed by the matrix material once the carbon dioxide has been removed [69]. In contrast to the nanoencapsulation methods previously mentioned, other physicochemical processes include “controlled precipitation” [70], and “layer-by-layer deposition” [71].

3.3. Physical-Mechanical Technique

Spray drying, solvent evaporation/solvent extraction, and electroencapsulation-based procedures are the three most common physicomechanical strategies for encapsulating desired species at the nanoscale scale [72]. Figure 6A shows the “spray drying” method is extensively used to encapsulate flavors, oils, and perfumes. Core particles are atomized into a heated chamber and disseminated in a polymer solution of wall material in a “spray drying process.” The shell material hardens onto the core particles as the solvent evaporates, resulting in polypore or matrix-type capsules. The spray drying process limits particle size to 100 nm using a one-droplet-to-one-particle mechanism [73].” Solvent evaporation/solvent extraction” (Figure 6C) is a process that involves dissolving a polymer together with the core substance in an organic solvent that is water-immiscible. The tiny polymer droplets containing the encapsulated substance are added dropwise to an aqueous solution. Simple solvent evaporation (heat or decreased pressure) or solvent extraction with a third liquid precipitant for the polymer and miscible with both water and the solvent can be used to eliminate the solvent [74]. The “solvent evaporation/solvent extraction” technique is used with the “freeze-drying” procedure [75]. A simple bottom-up technique for creating capsules with submicrometer sizes is “electrospraying” (Figure 6B). It is a technique for atomizing liquids using electrical forces. The capillary nozzle is kept at a high electric potential during “electrospraying,” electrical shear stress is applied to the flow out of the nozzle, causing tiny droplets. With this technique, the size of droplets varies from hundreds of micrometers to tens of nanometers and can be managed electrically by varying the flow velocity and voltage delivered to the nozzle [76]. For instance, “impacting of two oppositely charged droplets” is a technique where both droplets’ streams are released from two independent capillary nozzles maintained at opposite potentials, one of the capillaries at the positive and the other at the negative. This technique is known as “electrospraying/evaporation of colloidal suspension,” which involves electrospraying a suspension first, followed by solvent evaporation solidifying the shell. A suspension of the core material is electrosprayed into a bath that contains a gelatinizing or polymerizing chemical similar to the “electrospraying/gelatinization of colloidal suspension” technique. On the core material, this agent creates a tough envelope [77].
The potential is maintained by using two coaxial capillaries; the “electrocoextrusion” procedure sprays two liquids simultaneously into the electronanoencapsulation cavity. In this technique, an annular nozzle between the capillaries allows the envelope liquid to pass, while the core liquid emanates from the central capillary. It is essential to remember that this technology cannot be employed unless the core liquid has a high resistivity and the envelope has a suitably high conductivity [78]. It is possible to encapsulate materials into nanofibers and spherical nanocapsules using electronanoencapsulation techniques. The process of “electrospinning” creates nanofibers by supplying a suspension of the core material in a polymer solution from a spinneret, which forms a droplet at the spinneret outlet. This approach involves immersing an electrode in the suspension to create an electric field, positioning the counter-electrode away from the spinneret, and starting the jetting process [79]. The procedures of “melt-solidification” [80], “vibrating and coaxial nozzle” [78], and “pan coating” [81], in addition to the already mentioned, can be employed to encapsulate desirable species at the nanoscale. These preparation techniques can also be considered as green technology and eco-friendly, as most of them do not use organic solvents [82,83].

4. Nanoencapsulation Systems Advantages in the Food Industry

Foods and food products can deteriorate due to microbiological, enzymatic, physical, and chemical changes, which can deteriorate their quality, nutritional content, and safety, while also causing unwanted changes in shelf life, physicochemical, and sensory quality [84]. The use of synthetic additives in food was increasingly frequent [85]. However, producing safe foods with little or no artificial preservatives is one of the most pressing challenges for food manufacturing industries because synthetic agents and chemical food additives can have side effects on human health (Table 1) and an adverse environmental effect [86]. As a result, users’ preference for natural sources has lately risen, and increased consumer demand for safe food items has compelled the food industry to adopt natural herbal and plant-origin preservatives rather than synthetic preservatives in safe food manufacturing [87]. Natural chemicals found in herb and spice extracts, essential oils, and other secondary metabolites from plants, microbes, and enzymes are gaining popularity but are still underutilized. Because they are considerably safer and pose no health hazards to consumers, their application as bio preservatives and additives may open up new possibilities in food safety and quality preservation [88].
Recently, nanoencapsulation has attracted more and more attention from the food and healthcare sectors due to the numerous benefits it offers [94]. The minimal particle size and significant surface area give nanostructured materials exceptional properties and capabilities for their application in the food industry. Nanoencapsulation associated with natural compounds improves the efficiency of food processing and food safety [95]. The main improvements focus on changing the texture of food products, encapsulating edible substances or additives, developing original flavors, and improving the bioaccessibility/bioavailability of food components [6,20]. Figure 7 summarizes the main areas of the food sector covered by nanoencapsulation and its benefits.

5. Case Studies of the Application of Natural Compound Nanoencapsulation in the Food Industry

5.1. Incorporation into Food Matrices

5.1.1. Dairy Products and Beverages

Dairy products have been associated with better bone health, as well as a decreased risk of stroke, metabolic syndrome, and some malignancies. Additionally, because of their high protein content, they are a tasty and nutritious alternative for inclusion in a healthy diet throughout the day [96]. Widely recognized for their biological potential, studies indicate that the incorporation of polyphenols into dairy matrices is not feasible given the occurrence of interactions with food constituents, specifically between dairy proteins [97]. Nanoencapsulation has been proposed as one technique for avoiding these interactions, as a physical barrier between phenolic chemicals and the matrix [98]. An example of this is the difficulty of incorporating compounds with relatively low solubility in water, such as polyphenolic compounds and essential oils, a limitation in which their incorporation into CDs and PE-based nanoparticles has proven to be effective in overcoming [99,100]. From an organoleptic point of view, the encapsulation of bioactive compounds can help improve the product’s characteristics and reduce its volatility, prolonging its aromatic properties [100,101]. Nanoencapsulation improves nutritional properties and protects the environment of bioactive compounds in milk and milk products [99,102,103,104] (Table 2). Olive leaf extract is entrapped within nanoliposomes with a good encapsulation efficiency for application in food products, improving, for example, the antioxidant activity in yogurt [101]. Nanoencapsulated vitamin D3 shows the benefits of nanotechnology in dairy product fortification, and its effects on participants’ physical and mental health have been assessed [105,106,107].
For the same advantage cited previously, the nanoencapsulation of bioactive compounds has been applied in beverages. Curcumin was incorporated in orange juice, maintaining satisfactory pH, °Brix, and color stability, during three days of storage (8 °C) [108]. The bioactive compounds extracted from Egyptian prickly pear peel were encapsulated in sodium alginate and chitosan, and their antioxidant activity and application in guava juice were evaluated [109]. An overview of the nanoencapsulation of natural compounds applied in juice is listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Example of nanoencapsulation application in dairy products and beverages.
Table 2. Example of nanoencapsulation application in dairy products and beverages.
AgentNanoencapsulation SystemsPreparation
Technique
Biological ActivityFood ApplicationReference
VitD3LiposomeThin-film dispersion Improve the usage of spray-dried whey powder as a functional ingredient.Spray-dried whey powder[19]
Clove Essential Oil (CEO)Polyethylen
glycol
NanoemulsionsConservation/
antioxidant
potential.
Industrial fresh double cream cheese[99]
Chlorogenic acidsBeta-cyclodextrinLyophilizationPolyphenols effect/the profile of volatile aroma compounds.Caramel cottage cheese[100]
Olive leaf extractLiposomesEthanol injectionExamined considering syneresis, antioxidant activity, pH, acidity, color, and sensorial properties.Yogurt[101]
Phenolic extract of
jaboticaba
LipidNanoemulsionsEvaluated the total phenolic content/cow milk antioxidant
activity.
Cow milk[103]
skipjack tuna eyeballs oil (STEO-NL)LiposomesEthanol injectionFortificationCow milk[104]
VitDLipid/Evaluate the effect of 1500 IU nanoencapsulated vitamin D used for
fortifying.
Milk and yogurt[105]
VitDPrecirol
(Solid lipid)
Homogenization ultrasoundFortifying dairy
Products.
Milk/yogurt[106]
VitDLipidHomogenization with ultrasoundFortified effect/anti-
oxidant balance in adults.
Yogurt[107]
CurcuminPolyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)SolventEvaluated the fight against microbial contamination.Orange juice[108]
Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Egyptian Prickly Pears Peel FruitSodium alginate and chitosanSolvent evaporationProtect and improve their stability and bioavailability and evaluate their activity comparing to synthetic ones.Guava juice[109]
Wheat germ
oil (WGO)
Casein micellespH changes and ultra-sonicationFortification of dairy
Product.
Labneh[110]
Fish oilGum ArabicFreeze dryingProtecting against environmental conditions.Fermented milk[111]
Phenolics extract of grape and apple pomaceChitosan and soy proteinNanoemulsionsEnhancement of the native antioxidant activity of commercial apple and pineapple juices.Apple and pineapple juices[112]

5.1.2. Meat and Meat Products

Meat is an excellent source of proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals with a high biological value (vitamin B12, zinc, selenium, phosphorus, and iron). However, they are subject to bacterial growth and lipid oxidation, which are the main factors in the degradation and loss of physical, chemical, and sensory qualities [113,114]. The meat quality and shelf life were improved by bioactive molecule nanoencapsulation, directly to the meats or indirectly by adding to animal feed, to overcome the digestive system problems and physicochemical properties (hydrophobic and volatile) limits [115,116].
The impact of nutritional supplementation with encapsulated bioactive compounds can improve meat quality, such as broilers’ meat cholesterol reduction [115,117]. Curcumin nanoparticles on broiler chicks’ humoral immunity, blood metabolites, and growth performance were assessed by Badran et al. (2020) [118]. The investigation by Amiri et al. (2021) shows the positive effects of essential oils (nanoencapsulated garlic essential oil) on broiler chicken performance and intestinal health in vivo as well as in vitro (antibacterial and antioxidant characteristics) [119].
Furthermore, the nanoparticle impacts the expression of the mucin2 gene and the Lactobacilli population in the ileocaecal digest. Other studies have focused on broiler growth performance and immune function [120,121,122,123] (Table 3). Antibacterial and antioxidant compounds are used in meat and meat product preservation as meat surface coatings [124,125,126]. The effect of Trachyspermum Ammi essential oil as an antibacterial agent on turkey fillet storage was investigated by Kazemeini et al. (2021) [127]. The findings support that the previous nanoemulsion essential oil-loaded alginate exhibited an important antibacterial ability against Listeria monocytogenes. Their growth was inhibited even after twelve days of refrigeration. To avoid lamb meat spoilage and extend its shelf life, Pabast et al. (2018) have used Satureja khuzestanica essential oils with an edible chitosan nanoparticle coating. The microbiological outcomes after twenty days of storage were still satisfactory with nanoliposome coating treatments [128].
Meat enrichment has attracted the interest of researchers. Nanoencapsulation and ultrasound were used to enhance the lipid profile of pork meat. The pork meat was submerged in a nanovesicle fish oil solution and treated with ultrasound. The omega-6/omega-3 ratio in pork meat was beneficially modified, indicating that pork meat has a superior fatty acid profile [129]. Using a combined FTIR-PCA approach, Hădărugă et al. (2022) investigated the similarities/dissimilarities of raw and processed chicken breast and thigh lipids complexed by CDs [130]. The lipid nanoencapsulation using a food-grade natural CD was performed using kneading. Nanoencapsulation using CDs improved the thermal and oxidative status of the chicken lipid.
Along the same lines, Elbarbary et al. (2015) used chitosan vitamin C nanoparticles in meat lipids oxidative protection research. That complex shows an important antioxidant power, with lipids peroxidation down 75% [131].
Table 3. Summary of selected meat and meat product nanoencapsulation studies.
Table 3. Summary of selected meat and meat product nanoencapsulation studies.
AgentNanoencapsulation System Preparation TechniqueBiological Activity Food
Application
Reference
Cumin
essential oil,
ChitosanIonic gelationGrowth
performance/
immune
responses.
Broiler
chickens
[115]
Melastoma malabathricum L. Fruit extract
(Anthocyanin)
ChitosanIonic gelationBlood lipid profile.Feed
additive
Broiler chicken[117]
CurcuminSolid lipid nanoparticlesSolvent -evaporationGrowth performance, immune
response/
antioxidant activity.
Broilers chickens[118]
Garlic essential oilChitosanIonic gelationAntibacterial//antioxidant activities
/growth
performance.
Broiler chickens[119]
Garlic extract Metal nanoparticles (Calcium)/Antioxidant status, lipids profile,
immune
response.
Broiler chickens[120]
Mint (Mentha piperita), thyme (Thymus vulgaris), and cinnamon
(Cinnamomum Verum)
essential oils
ChitosanIonic gelationGrowth
performance, immune, and intestinal
bacteria.
Broiler chickens[122]
Phaleria macrocarpa
fruits extract
ChitosanIonic gelationAntioxidant and antimicrobial
activities,
and growth
performance.
Chickens[123]
Peppermint
(Mentha piperita)
Extract
AlginateEmulsionGrowth
performance, blood
parameters/immune
response.
Broiler chickens[132]
Silymarin
Seeds (Silybum marianum)
AlginateEmulsionAntioxidant/hepatoprotective activities.Broiler
chickens
[133]
Flaxseed oil: omega-3 fatty acidsProtein-sodium alginateNanoemulsionsTargeted delivery/bioavailability/growth performance/blood lipid profile.Enrich broiler meat[134]
Red onion (Alyssum homolocarpum) and seed gum
(Lepidium sativum ) extract
BiopolymericNanoemulsionAntioxidant and antimicrobial activities.ConservationBeef fillet[135]
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel extractAlginate nanospheresNanoemulsion Antimicrobial activity.Chicken meat[136]
clove essential oil (Eugenia Caryophyllata)Lipid nanoparticlesNanoemulsionAntibacterial and antioxidant activities.Chicken fillets[124]
Lemon
Essential Oil
ChitosanNanoemulsionAntioxidant activity.Fish burger[125]
Allium sativum L. essential oil (garlic)Liposomes/Antimicrobial activity.Beef meat-based hamburger[126]
Trachyspermum Ammi essential oil AlginateNanoemulsionAntibacterial activity (against Listeria monocyte genes).Turkey fillets[127]
Satureja khuzestanica essential oilLiposomes/Antibacterial and antioxidant activities.Lamb meat[128]
Fish oil: omega-3 fatty acidsLiposomeSolvent evaporationMeat
quality and
nutritional value.
Enrich pork meat [129]
Raw and processed chicken breast lipid
β-Cyclodextrin NanoemulsionLipid protection.Chicken[130]
Rosmarinus officinalis
essential oil
Chitosan-benzoic/acid nanogel Solvent
evaporation
Antibacterial activity.Beef cutlet[137]
Star anise essential oil, Polylysine, and NisinProtein isolateNanoemulsionAntimicrobial activity.Yao meat[138]
Thyme essential oil (Thymus vulgaris L.)ChitosanNanoemulsion and ionic gelationAntimicrobial and antioxidant activities.Beef burgers[139]
Jujube gum andnettle oil/NanoemulsionAntimicrobial and antioxidant activities.Beluga sturgeon fillets Seyed[140]
EugenolGelatin-chitosanSolvent
evaporation
Antibacterial and antioxidant activities.Chilled pork[141]
Laurus nobilis leaf extractLiposomeNanoemulsionOxidative, microbial, bacterial
and sensory properties.
Minced beef[142]

5.2. Food Packaging

Active chemicals, such as antimicrobials or antioxidants, can be added to packing material and gradually diffuse into the food for a longer-lasting effect. Unfortunately, many active agents are challenging to include directly in biopolymer-based films due to their volatile nature, difficulty dissolving in water, chemical instability, matrix incompatibility, or impacts on film properties. The resulting encapsulated active compounds can subsequently be integrated into food packaging materials to alter their functional performance [143].
Different nanoencapsulated systems associated with essential oils were used in the preparation of antibacterial packaging (Table 4), such as nanofiber film for beef packaging, containing tea tree oil (TTO) complexed in beta-cyclodextrin (β-CD) [144]. The antibacterial test of plasma-treated TTO/CD-inclusion complex poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) nanofibers demonstrated a sustained antibacterial action on beef after seven days of storage, which is in line with the practical applications of TTO/-CD-inclusion complex PEO nanofibers [144]. The film-based Ziziphora clinopodioides-Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil encapsulated in sodium alginate (NaAlg) nanoparticles might effectively decrease bacterial growth and oxidative or sensory degradation of lamb patties during storage. Nanoparticles also successfully reduced the development of the patties’ discoloration and foul odor [145]. Chrysanthemum essential oil encapsulated in chitosan successfully extended the shelf life of beef combined with its delayed release and antibacterial properties, thus having a broad prospect in food packaging [146]. The authors of [147] developed packaging containing essential oils from Ocimum gratissimum L. and Ocimum basilicum L. encapsulated in PLA nanofibers. This study evaluated the antifungal and antiocratoxigenic activities against A. niger of PLA nanofibers containing essential oil, and the impact of these packages on the physicochemical characteristics, freshness, and shelf life of table grapes. As a consequence, the created active packaging offers promise and may be acceptable for use in fruits.
Table 4 shows how phenolic chemicals, flavonoids, and vitamins were employed in conjunction with encapsulating structures to create food packaging. Thymol electrospun with polylactic acid (PLA) and poly(-caprolactone) (PCL) showed controlled release antioxidant and antibacterial potential as active food packaging [148]. M.H. Alvarez-Hernandez et al. (2021) evolved an antifungal energetic packaging and a C2H4 scavenger for cherry tomatoes, containing thymol encapsulated in chitosan. The C2H4-scavengers had been found to be beneficial in controlling postharvest fungal sicknesses as well as keeping fruit pleasant [149]. Many foods include lipids or proteins that are susceptible to oxidation, which can alter the nutritional content, shelf life, and quality. A film comprising solid lipid nanoparticles encapsulated in alpha-tocopherol, for example, displayed improved antioxidant capability, and controlled release of -tocopherol established its potential as active packaging for food preservation [150]. Recently, Y. Lei et al. (2023) demonstrated the possibility of creating an innovative kind of intelligent colorimetric film using pectin, sodium alginate, cellulose nanocrystals, and anthocyanins produced from red cabbage (RCA), that may be utilized for real-time shrimp freshness monitoring [151].
Table 4. Example of nanoencapsulation systems associated with bioactive compounds used in food packaging.
Table 4. Example of nanoencapsulation systems associated with bioactive compounds used in food packaging.
AgentNanoencapsulation SystemPreparation TechniqueBiological ActivityReference
Pomegranate peelAlginateEmulsificationAntimicrobial[136]
Tea tree oilBeta-cyclodextrin
(β-CD)
Co-precipitationAntibacterial activity[144]
Chrysanthemum essential oilChitosanElectrospinningAntibacterial[146]
Essential oil
(Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum gratissimum)
Polylactic acidSolution blow spinningAntifungal activity-antiocratoxigenic activity[147]
ThymolPolylactic acid Poly (ε-caprolactone)ElectrospinningRelease behavior, antibacterial activity, antioxidant activity[148]
ThymolChitosanEmulsificationAntifungal[149]
α-tocopherolSolid lipid
nanoparticles
High homogenization techniqueAntioxidant[150]
AnthocyaninsPectin, Sodium alginate, Cellulose nanocrystalsHydrogel filmAntioxidant activity[151]
Garlic essential oilLiposomal, chitosanThin-layer hydration-sonicationAntioxidant activity, Microbial and chemical changes[152]
Oregano essential oil
(Carvacrol)
β-cyclodextrinKneadingControlled EO release, antioxidant activity[153]
Gallic acidHydroxypropyl methylcelluloseElectrospinningAntioxidant activity[154]
PhycocyaninPolymers
(PLLA: PVA)
Electrospinning/electrosprayingAntioxidant activity[155]
Cinnamodendron dinisii
essential oil
Chitosan-zeinPrecipitation/casting methodantioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity[156]
AnthocyaninsChitosan/Alginat/ProteinElectrospinningAntioxidant/antibacterial[157]
Clove essential oilProtein (ZEIN-sodium caseinate)Modified antisolvent precipitationAntimicrobial, antibacterial activity[158]
EugenolPoly (lactic acid)/nanoparticles (MgO and ZnO/GelatinElectrospinningAntioxidant activity, Antibacterial activity[159]
Mentha spicata L. essential oilProtein (Sodium caseinate)/MgO nanoparticlesElectrospinningAntimicrobial activity[160]
CuminaldehydeHydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrinElectrospinningAntibacterial[161]
Coconut oil and solid hydrogenated palm oil (cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, and thymol)Solid lipid nanoparticlesNanoemulsionAntifungal (Rhizopus stolonifer, Alternaria spp., and Aspergillus niger)[162]
Cinnamon and oregano essential oilsChitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/b-cyclodextrinElectrospinningAntifungal activity[163]

5.3. Dietary Supplements/Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods

Nanoencapsulation systems containing natural bioactive compounds and nutrients as nutraceuticals or pharmaceuticals, such as phenolic compounds, carotenoids, essential oils, essential fatty acids, vitamins, and others (minerals, enzymes, and pre/probiotics), can be used as a favorable technological approach to produce functional foods, supplements, and drugs [102]. A brief overview of nanoencapsulation studies of natural bioactive compounds and nutrients through various nanoencapsulation techniques and systems is provided in Table 5.
In the food industry, encapsulation has been studied, particularly in the creation of nanoencapsulation systems for phenolics, antioxidants, and phytochemical substances. For example, Hadavi et al. (2020) and Dehcheshmeh and Fathi (2019) discovered that nanoliposomes and tragacanth/zein nanofibers enhanced saffron’s water solubility and thermal stability, respectively [164,165]. Jain et al. (2021) effectively manufactured whey protein isolate nanospheres using an electrospray technique to increase the stability and antidiabetic activity of bioactive component extracts [166]. Liu et al. (2020) and Drosou et al. (2022) constructed liposomes and pullulan/whey protein isolate based on an ethanol injection and coaxial electrospinning methods, respectively, which enhanced the storage stability and bioavailability and provided excellent protection through β-carotene against simulated gastrointestinal environments. All these reports suggested that suitable encapsulation systems could be essential to improve the bioaccessibility and thereby the in vivo efficacy of phenolics and antioxidants [138,167].
Some researchers have shown the ability of nano-formulations to load phenolic compounds and antioxidants investigated as dietary supplements/nutraceuticals or functional foods. As an example, a study by Peng et al. (2018) and Zheng et al. (2018), designed a stable and sustained-release nanoencapsulation system for curcumin through small lipid particles. It was indicated that the developed nanoemulsions gave bioaccessibilities that were similar to those of the best commercial formulation tested [168,169]. Furthermore, Bateni et al. (2022) studied the effects of nano-curcumin supplementation on oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, adiponectin, and NF-κB in patients with metabolic syndrome. They claimed that in a 12-week supplementation with 80 mg/day nano-micelle, curcumin improves mean malondialdehyde, total antioxidant capacity, and adiponectin [170]. Mauri et al. (2021) incorporated hydroxytyrosol in nanogels prepared with polyethylene glycol/polyethyleneimine. They showed that the nanogels do not induce oxidative stress, thus demonstrating their biosafety, and exhibit good therapeutic effects against hepatic steatosis, a significant decrease in the intercellular triglyceride levels, and restoring cell viability [171]. On the other hand, Li et al. (2018) and Jiang et al. (2022) revealed that the antioxidant capabilities of typical flavonoids such as quercetin and catechin can be increased by loading into nanofibers and nanoparticles. The resulting nano-formulation exhibited excellent dietary performance and good antioxidant capacity that was superior to nonencapsulated flavonoids and displayed a sustained release in an in vitro experiment [172,173].
The nanoemulsions produced using caseinate showed the highest oxidative stability, improved stability during in vitro digestion, and reduced the rate of lipolysis of fish oil emulsions. Raeisi, et al. (2019) constructed Persian gum-chitosan based on an electrostatic layer-by-layer deposition method, which enhanced the physicochemical characteristics and thermal stability of co-encapsulated fish oil/garlic essential oil [174].
Another group of nutrients applied in nano-formulations is vitamins. As an example, Zhang et al. (2022) and Xiang et al. (2020) encapsulated vitamin D3 within nanoparticles that improved storage stability and sustained release in simulated gastrointestinal digestion [175,176]. Furthermore, Baek et al. (2021) nanoencapsulated vitamin C with cellulose/chitosan nanocapsules; they claimed that these novel nanocarriers enhanced stability, antimicrobial activity, and vitamin release [177]. In another study, Parthasarathy et al. (2016) revealed that the oral bioavailability of vitamin E in nanoemulsion form was enhanced in vivo, with a 3-fold increase over the conventional emulsion [178]. Resende et al. (2020) nanoencapsulated vitamin A. The in vitro assays simulating gastrointestinal digestion suggested that the nanoparticles are not altered in the stomach. The biocompatibility of the formulations showed no toxicity in fibroblasts. With the developed nanoparticles, 80% of the added vitamin reached the intestine in the digestibility assay [179].
Table 5. Nanoencapsulation of natural bioactive compounds and vitamins as nutraceutical/pharmaceutical in functional foods and dietary supplements (Vit: vitamin).
Table 5. Nanoencapsulation of natural bioactive compounds and vitamins as nutraceutical/pharmaceutical in functional foods and dietary supplements (Vit: vitamin).
Agent Nanoencapsulation SystemsPreparation
Technique
Biological ActivityReference
CurcuminSaponin micelles nanoparticlespH-driven loading methodThe curcumin nanoparticles greatly increased its in vivo bioavailability.[168]
Corn oil/sodium
hydroxide
NanoemulsionsThe developed curcumin nanoemulsions gave bio accessibilities that were similar to those of the best commercial formulation tested.[169]
Nano-micelle soft gel capsulesIndustrial product (Exir-Nano-Sina, IRC:1228225765)A 12-week supplementation with 80 mg/day nano-micelle curcumin improves mean malondialdehyde, total antioxidant capacity, and adiponectin in patients with metabolic syndrome.[170]
Keto-CurcuminLipid systems NanoemulsionPreserving the antioxidant activity and improving their stability.[180]
Curcumin and Vit. D3NanoliposomesContinuous
supercritical CO2
Improving the stability and antioxidant activity.[181]
Quercetin and CurcuminMicelles/casein Vigorous shakingEncapsulation systems revealed high entrapment efficiency and bio-protection. The cytotoxicity of co-encapsulated bioactives was higher than that of free forms.[182]
Vitamin D3 and CurcuminLipid-core nanocapsulesInterfacial deposition of preformed polymer techniqueRegulating inflammation and purine metabolism in a model of arthritis.[183]
AnthocyaninsNanocomplexes of chitosan hydrochloride/carboxymethyl chitosanElectrostatic interactionEncapsulated form improved the stability.[184]
Chitosan nanoparticlesIonotropic gelationAttenuates hyperlipidemic aberrations in male Wistar rats by inhibiting lipid peroxidation, increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and suppressing development of lipogenesis.[185]
QuercetinCellulose nanofibersNano-formulationsNano-formulation exhibited excellent dietary performance and good antioxidant capacity that was superior to nonencapsulated and displayed a sustained release in an in vitro experiment.[173]
Soluble soybean polysaccharide/chitosanpH-driven encapsulation procedureEncapsulated quercetin exhibits better biological activity and enhanced solubility in an aqueous solution.[186]
Chitosan/lecithinElectrostatic depositionThe storage stability and antioxidant activity were improved.[187]
CatechinNanocyclodextrin/metal/organicSolvothermal assisted ultrasoundImproving the storage stability and exhibiting superior bioavailability.[172]
Starch nanoparticlesUltrasonication treatment and homogenizationBioactive properties were retained at a higher level upon in vitro digestion.[188]
Epigallocatechin gallateDouble shell material chitosan recombinant soybean seed H-2 ferritinElectrostatic interactionsPromote stabilization and absorption.[189]
CarotenoidsTritonX100/Tween 80NanoemulsionsRetention of antioxidant efficiency.[190]
β-carotenePure pullulan/whey protein isolateCoaxial
electrospinning
Provided greater protection against oxidative degradation under different storage temperatures. Improved stability at low humidity environments[167]
Long or medium chain triglyceridesExcipient nanoemulsionsNanoemulsions have considerable potential for improving nutraceutical bioavailability from dietary supplements.[191]
Vit.C and β-CaroteneLiposomes (lecithin, cholesterol/phosphate-buffer solutionEthanol injectionImproving the storage stability and bioavailability.[192]
HydroxytyrosolPolyethyleneglycol/polyethyleneimine nanogelsMulti-step procedure (activation of PEG; PEI functionalization; formation of nanogel network)Nanogels improved therapeutic effects against hepatic steatosis (significant decrease in the intracellular triglyceride levels, restoring cell viability).[171]
Picrorhiza kurroa extractPluronic-F-68 copolymer-based biodegradable PLA nanoparticlesNanoprecipitationProvides nutraceutical with increased suitability for better hepato-protection by enhancing intestinal absorption and bioavailability.[193]
Phenolic extractsLiposomes NanoemulsionsProtection of phenolic compounds under stomach conditions and increase their bioaccessibility.[194]
Bioactive compounds of Tinospora cordifolia leaf extractWhey protein isolateElectrosprayIncrease of 28.12% in vitro antidiabetic activity.[166]
Saffron extractTragacanth/zein nanofibersElectrospinningEnhancing thermal stability.[164]
SaffronNanoliposomes Heating methodIncrease solubility.[165]
FucoxanthinCasein/chitosanHomogenization, and injection into the electrospray systemThe nanomaterial improved water solubility and bioavailability.[195]
Crocin, Safranal/PicrocrocinPectin/whey protein/water–oilNanoemulsions and nanodropletsHigh storage stability and controlled release.[196]
Fish oilCaseinate/glycated caseinateNanoemulsionsImproved stability during in vitro digestion, increased oxidative stability, and reduced the rate of lipolysis.[197]
Fish oil and Garlic essential oilPersian gum/chitosanElectrostatic layer-by-layer depositionImprove physicochemical characteristics and thermal stability (excellent thermal stability of >250 °C).[174]
Omega-3 fatty acidsSolid lipid nanoparticleEmulsionEnhancing the growth inhibitory effects of ω-3 PUFAs in human HT-29 CRC cells after encapsulation.[198]
LipidNanoemulsionNanoparticles caused greater and more sustained formation of NO and enhanced their anti-aggregatory effects.[199]
Probiotic strainsStarch/sodium alginateElectrospinningThe viability rate of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria strains in the acidic environment and simulated gastrointestinal condition enhanced significantly.[200]
Vit. D3Ovalbumin-pectin nano complexesAntisolvent precipitationEnhanced storage stability and sustained release in simulated gastrointestinal digestion.[175]
LipidNanoemulsionImprovement of bioaccessibility, bioavailability, and stability.[176]
LipidHomogenization/sonicationImproved bioavailability.[201]
Oil (ethylene glycol, kolliphor-RH-40 in-water emulsionSonicationIncreased gut bioavailability, and improved stability.[202]
LipidHot high-pressure homogenizationImproved the oral bioavailability.[203]
Nano-niosomes (Span 60 and Tween 80/isopropyl alcohol)Thin layer hydration and sonicationIncreasing effects on encapsulation efficiency and antioxidant capacity.[204]
Vit. CModified cellulose nanocrystal/chitosan nanocapsulesIonic gelationImproving the stability, antimicrobial activity, and vitamin release.[177]
NanoliposomesThin-film evaporationControl the stability.[205]
Vit. B2Alginate/chitosanIonotropic polyelectrolyte/pre-gelationIncrease vitamin stability and release.[206]
Vit. B9 (folic acid)Casein nanoparticlesCoacervation/dried using spray-dryingPreventing its release in an acid environment and promoting its oral bioavailability through in vitro and in vivo studies.[207]
LiposomeProliposome/suspension Prolonged release and solubility of folic acid.[208]
Vit. ALipid nanoparticleOrganic solvent-free sonicationBiocompatibility of the formulations showed no toxicity in fibroblasts and assured oral bioaccessibility.[179]

6. Nanoencapsulation Application in Food Safety Sensors

Food safety is directly tied to human health and societal stability. Food safety is a major concern for governments all around the world. Food preservation treatment and food quality inspection are the two critical lines of defense in the fight to maintain food safety [209]. As a result, research has concentrated on developing simple, efficient, and environmentally friendly quality inspection and preservation systems. The most prevalent food quality detection tools are presently sensory identification, microbiological detection and analysis, physical and chemical analysis, and instrumental analysis [210].
Conventional sensors include the target analyte, recognition element, signal transducer, and processor. These techniques are often limited by issues such as expensive costs, complicated detection processes, low accuracy, and long processing times [211,212]. Nanotechnology is employed to develop nanosensors and nano(bio)sensors for detecting food contaminants, changes in color, odor, texture, adulteration, and infections in food systems. Nanosensors of this type could be integrated into packaging materials. The method that a food sensor is affixed to packaging must satisfy the sensor’s specifications for it to work. Several sensors, for example, must be placed so that their signal could be interpreted by the user while interacting with the food [213]. The inclusion of nanosensors into food packaging has resulted in several advantages over traditional sensors, including better sensitivity and specificity, faster analysis, higher sample throughput (multiplex systems), decreased assay complexity, and lower cost [214]. Gold nanostructures, aluminum nanoparticles, nanotubes, and some other active nanostructures have been or can be utilized as microbial or other food safety nanosensors in food packaging [215,216,217]. Lastly, Gallic acid-AuNP@Tollens’ was used to quantify analytes in real samples. The plasmonic resonance of GA-AuNP@Tollens’ was used to detect formaldehyde and benzaldehyde across a linear range of 10–150 nM and 0.15–0.75 M, respectively. Both optimization and detection were performed at 409 nm UV absorbance. The suggested approach yielded detection limits of formaldehyde and benzaldehyde of 20.08 nM and 0.12 M, respectively. For both analytes, the smartphone-based detection approach demonstrated high linearity, with an R-Square value of 0.95 [218]. Federico Mazur et al., (2020) designed a liposome-based approach for detecting Listeria monocytogenes via Listeriolysin O sensing (LLO). LLO generates pores in liposome membranes, releasing encapsulated cysteine, which causes gold nanoparticles to aggregate, resulting in an observable red-to-purple color shift. In PBS and human serum, the system had an LOD of 12.9 and 19.5 g/mL, respectively. Although the sensor’s efficiency was not shown in food samples, its paper-based structure and quick test time of about 5 min make it appropriate for non-laboratory applications such as agricultural settings [219]. A similar membrane-based technique was also utilized to detect alpha-hemolysin, a toxin secreted by Staphylococcus aureus, in milk samples. The method was created to identify toxins in cow’s milk to assist in the diagnosis of mastitis and the administration of antibiotics. The technique might potentially be used to detect the presence of contaminants in milk before it is consumed. The technique detects the toxin in phosphate-buffered saline (LOD = 3.62 g/mL) and milk (LOD = 6.62 g/mL) using PDA vesicles functionalized with phospholipids and cholesterol [220].

7. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Physical techniques of synthesis usually involve the use of costly instruments, high temperatures and pressures, and large amounts of energy. Chemical procedures sometimes necessitate the use of expensive metal salts as well as hazardous or toxic solvents [221]. Meanwhile, green approaches employ diverse biotechnological technologies to generate nanoparticles via biological pathways (microorganisms, plants, or viruses) or their byproducts (such as proteins and lipids) [222]. Green nanotechnology has sparked widespread attention due to its inherent characteristics of speed, simplicity, environmental friendliness, and low cost [223]. To accomplish the more efficient synthesis of nanocarriers, researchers can use novel technologies such as electrostatic spinning and electrostatic spraying with easy operations and moderate reaction conditions in the future.
Even though nanocomposites have been widely employed in functional ingredient delivery, food creation, and active food packaging preparation, the applications have centered on the nanoparticles incorporating nanocomposites [224]. In addition, other nanocarriers, such as nanoemulsions, nano-micelles, nanoliposomes, and nanogels, have fewer uses. There are also benefits over nanoparticles, such as increased loading capacities and absorption efficiencies [225]. The application ranges of various nanoencapsulation systems should be widened.
Nanomaterials are increasingly being used in industrial applications, including the food sector, to bring new benefits to customers and additional features. Although advantageous, improvements in nanotechnology are also linked with increased potential toxicity and ecotoxicity, owing primarily to the peculiar qualities of nanoparticles (shape, tiny size, chemical composition, structure, and increased surface area) [226]. Nanoparticles, despite their small size, may infiltrate and translocate through the circulatory and lymphatic systems, eventually reaching human tissues and organs [227]. Nanoparticles can cause irreversible cell damage through oxidative stress or organelle injury. As a result, future research should focus on nanocarrier toxicity to assure the production of safe and non-toxic nanocarriers. Many experiments have been conducted to improve the targeted release of nanoencapsulation systems in certain regions of the human body, such as the gastrointestinal system. However, the majority of these carriers have only partially accomplished the controlled release at the target site, and have simply lowered the release consumption of nanoencapsulation systems in other locations. As a result, how to reduce the loss of nanoencapsulation systems in other parts and improve the targeted recognition and stable release of nanoencapsulation systems by chemical modification/surface functionalization of nanocarrier raw materials, or preparing nanocarriers with different raw materials at the same time, remains an area of future research. Exact assessment of nanoparticle discharge into the environment and occupational exposure is challenging. Information is desperately needed to better understand nanoparticle-biological interactions and processes [228]. While a continual stream of in vitro studies points to potential paths, in vivo nanoparticle studies have failed to establish a coherent system. In vivo, examination is one step closer to therapeutic application and reflects the organism’s adaption and damage more directly. Despite significant development in the field of nanotoxicology, there is still a gap between validation and evidence-based research [229]. Current toxicological tests must be modernized, and new technologies (such as proteomics, functional genomics, high-throughput screening, and metabolomics) must be progressively integrated into these investigations. These new methods will reduce the rate of false positives while also accelerating and validating the assessment of nanoparticle toxicity.
Safety and health, as well as regulatory rules, should be considered during the production, processing, active packaging, and consumption of nano-processed food items [230]. Regarding the regulatory implications of nanostructures in the food and medical industries, no formal law is established internationally. The majority of nations currently lack precise standards for assessing the danger of encapsulated nano-products. The prospects for the nanoencapsulation of bioactive compounds highlight the need for their worldwide regulation to facilitate their safe use and marketing. Various studies reporting the beneficial effects of nanostructured bioactive compounds support this trend and offer a promising future direction for research.

8. Conclusions

Nanoencapsulation of natural compounds is observed as one of the sector areas in which nanotechnology will play a significant part. The evolution of numerous processes and systems has resulted in applications with varying degrees of complexity and adaptability, with the physicochemical qualities of the bioactive component playing a role in the formulation approach. The nanoencapsulation of natural compounds has found usage in various food industries, such as incorporation into food matrices, packaging, dietary supplements/nutraceuticals, and functional foods. However, further research is necessary to understand the safety and toxicity of nanomaterials. It is also essential to develop global regulations that will promote the safe marketing of new nanotechnology products, which have the potential to improve health outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M. and L.T.; methodology, L.T., O.D., C.B., M.A.-A. and H.B.; investigation, L.T., O.D., C.B., M.A.-A. and H.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.T., O.D., C.B., M.A.-A. and H.B.; writing—review and editing, S.F. and F.R.; supervision, L.T., K.M., S.F. and F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting this study are included in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the General Directorate of Scientific Research and Technological Development (DGRSDT/MESRS-Algeria).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Loh, H.C.; Seah, Y.K.; Looi, I. The COVID-19 pandemic and diet change. Prog. Microbes Mol. Biol. 2021, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Abreu Figueiredo, J.; de Paula Silva, C.R.; Oliveira, M.F.S.; Norcino, L.B.; Campelo, P.H.; Botrel, D.A.; Borges, S.V. Microencapsulation by spray chilling in the food industry: Opportunities, challenges, and innovations. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chamorro, F.; Carpena, M.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Echave, J.; Rajoka, M.S.R.; Barba, F.J.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Valorization of kiwi agricultural waste and industry by-products by recovering bioactive compounds and applications as food additives: A circular economy model. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, M.; Lu, J.-J.; Ding, J. Natural Products in Cancer Therapy: Past, Present, and Future. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2021, 11, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yadav, N.; Mudgal, D.; Anand, R.; Jindal, S.; Mishra, V. Recent Development in Nanoencapsulation and Delivery of NaturalBioactives through Chitosan Scaffolds for Various Biological Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 220, 537–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guía-García, J.L.; Charles-Rodríguez, A.V.; Reyes-Valdés, M.H.; Ramírez-Godina, F.; Robledo-Olivo, A.; García-Osuna, H.T.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Flores-López, M.L. Micro and Nanoencapsulation of Bioactive Compounds for Agri-Food Applications: A Review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 186, 115198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pateiro, M.; Gómez, B.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Barba, F.J.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Lorenzo, J.M. Nanoencapsulation of Promising Bioactive Compounds to Improve Their Absorption, Stability, Functionality and the Appearance of the Final Food Products. Molecules 2021, 26, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Assadpour, E.; Mahdi Jafari, S. A Systematic Review on Nanoencapsulation of Food Bioactive Ingredients and Nutraceuticals by Various Nanocarriers. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3129–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hosseini, H.; Jafari, S.M. Introducing Nano/Microencapsulated Bioactive Ingredients for Extending the Shelf-Life of Food Products. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 282, 102210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Norkaew, O.; Thitisut, P.; Mahatheeranont, S.; Pawin, B.; Sookwong, P.; Yodpitak, S.; Lungkaphin, A. Effect of Wall Materials on Some Physicochemical Properties and Release Characteristics of Encapsulated Black Rice Anthocyanin Microcapsules. Food Chem. 2019, 294, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samborska, K.; Boostani, S.; Geranpour, M.; Hosseini, H.; Dima, C.; Khoshnoudi-Nia, S.; Rostamabadi, H.; Falsafi, S.R.; Shaddel, R.; Akbari-Alavijeh, S. Green Biopolymers from By-Products as Wall Materials for Spray Drying Microencapsulation of Phytochemicals. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 297–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maqsoudlou, A.; Assadpour, E.; Mohebodini, H.; Jafari, S.M. The influence of nanodelivery systems on the antioxidant activity of natural bioactive compounds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 3208–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ghosh, S.; Sarkar, T.; Das, A.; Chakraborty, R. Micro and nanoencapsulation of natural colors: A holistic view. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 193, 3787–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Momin, J.K.; Joshi, B.H. Nanotechnology in Foods. In Nanotechnologies in Food and Agriculture; Rai, M., Ribeiro, C., Mattoso, L., Duran, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 3–24. ISBN 978-3-319-14023-0. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sahoo, M.; Vishwakarma, S.; Panigrahi, C.; Kumar, J. Nanotechnology: Current Applications and Future Scope in Food. Food Front. 2021, 2, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mohammad, Z.H.; Ahmad, F.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Zaidi, S. Application of Nanotechnology in Different Aspects of the Food Industry. Discov. Food 2022, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cruz-Lopes, L.; Macena, M.; Guiné, R.P.F. Application of Nanotechnologies along the Food Supply Chain. Open Agric. 2021, 6, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, A.; Nagarajan, J.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Bodana, V.; Singh, A.; Prabhakar, P.K.; Suhag, R.; Kumar, R. Nanotechnology Applications and Implications in Food Industry. In Nanotechnology Applications for Food Safety and Quality Monitoring; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 171–182. ISBN 978-0-323-85791-8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Soni, M.; Maurya, A.; Das, S.; Prasad, J.; Yadav, A.; Singh, V.K.; Singh, B.K.; Dubey, N.K.; Dwivedy, A.K. Nanoencapsulation Strategies for Improving Nutritional Functionality, Safety and Delivery of Plant-Based Foods: Recent Updates and Future Opportunities. Plant Nano Biol. 2022, 1, 100004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martins, V.F.R.; Pintado, M.E.; Morais, R.M.S.C.; Morais, A.M.M.B. Valorisation of Micro/Nanoencapsulated Bioactive Compounds from Plant Sources for Food Applications Towards Sustainability. Foods 2022, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Awuchi, C.G.; Morya, S.; Dendegh, T.A.; Okpala, C.O.R.; Korzeniowska, M. Nanoencapsulation of Food Bioactive Constituents and Its Associated Processes: A Revisit. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 19, 101088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lim, D.Y.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, H.G. Nano-Encapsulation of a Combination of Clove Oil and Thymol and Their Application in Fresh-Cut Apples and Raw Minced Beef. Food Control 2023, 148, 109683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choudhary, M.; Kaur, A.; Kaur, P. Recent Development in Nanoencapsulation of β-Sitosterol and γ-Oryzanol and Food Fortification. In Handbook of Nanoencapsulation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 65–81. ISBN 978-1-00-325918-3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Oprea, I.; Fărcaș, A.C.; Leopold, L.F.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Coman, C.; Socaci, S.A. Nano-Encapsulation of Citrus Essential Oils: Methods and Applications of Interest for the Food Sector. Polymers 2022, 14, 4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vasisht, N. Nanoencapsulation in the Food Industry. In Microencapsulation in the Food Industry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 209–213. ISBN 978-0-12-821683-5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bangham, A.D.; Standish, M.M.; Watkins, J.C. Diffusion of Univalent Ions across the Lamellae of Swollen Phospholipids. J. Mol. Biol. 1965, 13, 238–252, IN26–IN27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Eskandari, V.; Sadeghi, M.; Hadi, A. Physical and Chemical Properties of Nano-Liposome, Application in Nano Medicine. J. Appl. Comput. Appl. Mech. 2021, 52, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, J.Y.; Chuesiang, P.; Shin, G.H.; Park, H.J. Post-Processing Techniques for the Improvement of Liposome Stability. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sriwidodo; Umar, A.K.; Wathoni, N.; Zothantluanga, J.H.; Das, S.; Luckanagul, J.A. Liposome-Polymer Complex for Drug Delivery System and Vaccine Stabilization. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zielińska, A.; Cano, A.; Andreani, T.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Silva, A.M.; Szalata, M.; Słomski, R.; Souto, E.B. Lipid-Drug Conjugates and Nanoparticles for the Cutaneous Delivery of Cannabidiol. IJMS 2022, 23, 6165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perumal, S.; Atchudan, R.; Lee, W. A Review of Polymeric Micelles and Their Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Benitez, A.R.; Margalit, D.; Ryskin, M.; Dor, M.; Shuali, U.; Nir, S.; Polubesova, T.; Ben-Ari, J.; Kertsnus-Banchik, J.; Undabeytia, T. Modified Compositions of Micelle–Clay and Liposome–Clay Composites for Optimal Removal from Water of Bacteria and Hydrophobic Neutral Chemicals. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blanco-Llamero, C.; Fonseca, J.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Santini, A.; Señoráns, F.J.; Souto, E.B. Nutraceuticals and Food-Grade Lipid Nanoparticles: From Natural Sources to a Circular Bioeconomy Approach. Foods 2022, 11, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Madkhali, O.A. Perspectives and Prospective on Solid Lipid Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. Molecules 2022, 27, 1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, C.; McClements, D.J. Application of Advanced Emulsion Technology in the Food Industry: A Review and Critical Evaluation. Foods 2021, 10, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Priyanka, K.R.; Rajaram, R.; Sivakumar, S.R. A Critical Review on Pharmacological Properties of Marine Macroalgae. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abka-khajouei, R.; Tounsi, L.; Shahabi, N.; Patel, A.K.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. Structures, Properties and Applications of Alginates. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Abourehab, M.A.S.; Rajendran, R.R.; Singh, A.; Pramanik, S.; Shrivastav, P.; Ansari, M.J.; Manne, R.; Amaral, L.S.; Deepak, A. Alginate as a Promising Biopolymer in Drug Delivery and Wound Healing: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lomartire, S.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. Novel Technologies for Seaweed Polysaccharides Extraction and Their Use in Food with Therapeutically Applications—A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jayakody, M.M.; Vanniarachchy, M.P.G.; Wijesekara, I. Seaweed Derived Alginate, Agar, and Carrageenan Based Edible Coatings and Films for the Food Industry: A Review. Food Meas. 2022, 16, 1195–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dong, Y.; Wei, Z.; Xue, C. Recent Advances in Carrageenan-Based Delivery Systems for Bioactive Ingredients: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Álvarez-Viñas, M.; Souto, S.; Flórez-Fernández, N.; Torres, M.D.; Bandín, I.; Domínguez, H. Antiviral Activity of Carrageenans and Processing Implications. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garavand, F.; Cacciotti, I.; Vahedikia, N.; Rehman, A.; Tarhan, Ö.; Akbari-Alavijeh, S.; Shaddel, R.; Rashidinejad, A.; Nejatian, M.; Jafarzadeh, S. A Comprehensive Review on the Nanocomposites Loaded with Chitosan Nanoparticles for Food Packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1383–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khajavian, M.; Vatanpour, V.; Castro-Muñoz, R.; Boczkaj, G. Chitin and Derivative Chitosan-Based Structures—Preparation Strategies Aided by Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 275, 118702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Huq, T.; Khan, A.; Brown, D.; Dhayagude, N.; He, Z.; Ni, Y. Sources, Production and Commercial Applications of Fungal Chitosan: A Review. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2022, 7, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sabaghi, M.; Tavasoli, S.; Hoseyni, S.Z.; Mozafari, M.R.; Degraeve, P.; Katouzian, I. A Critical Review on Approaches to Regulate the Release Rate of Bioactive Compounds from Biopolymeric Matrices. Food Chem. 2022, 382, 132411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, Z.; Ye, L.; Xi, J.; Wang, J.; Feng, Z. Cyclodextrin Polymers: Structure, Synthesis, and Use as Drug Carriers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 118, 101408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chandel, V.; Biswas, D.; Roy, S.; Vaidya, D.; Verma, A.; Gupta, A. Current Advancements in Pectin: Extraction, Properties and Multifunctional Applications. Foods 2022, 11, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rohasmizah, H.; Azizah, M. Pectin-Based Edible Coatings and Nanoemulsion for the Preservation of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Taouzinet, L.; Fatmi, S.; Lahiani-Skiba, M.; Skiba, M.; Iguer-Ouada, M. Encapsulation Nanotechnology in Sperm Cryopreservation: Systems Preparation Methods and Antioxidants Enhanced Delivery. Cryolettres 2021, 42, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mundel, R.; Thakur, T.; Chatterjee, M. Emerging Uses of PLA–PEG Copolymer in Cancer Drug Delivery. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Casalini, T.; Rossi, F.; Castrovinci, A.; Perale, G. A Perspective on Polylactic Acid-Based Polymers Use for Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ranakoti, L.; Gangil, B.; Mishra, S.K.; Singh, T.; Sharma, S.; Ilyas, R.A.; El-Khatib, S. Critical Review on Polylactic Acid: Properties, Structure, Processing, Biocomposites, and Nanocomposites. Materials 2022, 15, 4312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ilyas, R.A.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Aisyah, H.A.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Hassan, S.A.; Zainudin, E.S.; Sapuan, S.M.; Sharma, S.; Bangar, S.P.; Jumaidin, R. Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid, Polylactic Acid Blends and Their Composites for Advanced Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Numata, K. How to Define and Study Structural Proteins as Biopolymer Materials. Polym. J. 2020, 52, 1043–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tang, C.-H. Assembly of Food Proteins for Nano-Encapsulation and Delivery of Nutraceuticals (a Mini-Review). Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 117, 106710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Susanti, D.; Haris, M.S.; Taher, M.; Khotib, J. Natural Products-Based Metallic Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 895616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ameta, S.K.; Rai, A.K.; Hiran, D.; Ameta, R.; Ameta, S.C. Use of Nanomaterials in Food Science. In Biogenic Nano-Particles and their Use in Agro-Ecosystems; Ghorbanpour, M., Bhargava, P., Varma, A., Choudhary, D.K., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 457–488. ISBN 9789811529849. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tirado-Kulieva, V.A.; Sánchez-Chero, M.; Palacios Jimenez, D.P.; Sánchez-Chero, J.; Ygnacio Santa Cruz, A.G.; Minchán Velayarce, H.H.; Pozo Suclupe, L.A.; Carbajal Garcia, L.O. A Critical Review on The Integration of Metal Nanoparticles in Biopolymers: An Alternative for Active and Sustainable Food Packaging. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2022, 10, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alehosseini, E.; Jafari, S.M. Nanoencapsulation of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) and Their Applications in Various Fields for Energy Storage and Management. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 283, 102226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Håkansson, A. Emulsion Formation by Homogenization: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 10, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. El-hoshoudy, A.N.M.B. Emulsion Polymerization Mechanism. In Recent Research in Polymerization; Cankaya, N., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-953-51-3746-7. [Google Scholar]
  63. Parimala, B.; Dinesha, B.L.; Vijayakumar, S.H.; Manjunath, B. A Review on Application of Nano-Technology in Food Industry: Nano-encapsulation, Nano-Sensors and Nano-Emulsions. Pharma Innov. J. 2021, 10, 333–337. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bokov, D.; Turki Jalil, A.; Chupradit, S.; Suksatan, W.; Javed Ansari, M.; Shewael, I.H.; Valiev, G.H.; Kianfar, E. Nanomaterial by Sol-Gel Method: Synthesis and Application. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, K.; Xu, Y.; Lu, L.; Shi, C.; Huang, Y.; Mao, Z.; Duan, C.; Ren, X.; Guo, Y.; Huang, C. Hydrodynamic Cavitation: A Feasible Approach to Intensify the Emulsion Cross-Linking Process for Chitosan Nanoparticle Synthesis. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 74, 105551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Azagury, A.; Fonseca, V.C.; Cho, D.Y.; Perez-Rogers, J.; Baker, C.M.; Steranka, E.; Goldenshtein, V.; Calvao, D.; Darling, E.M.; Mathiowitz, E. Single Step Double-Walled Nanoencapsulation (SSDN). J. Control Release 2018, 280, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Siddiqui, S.A.; Bahmid, N.A.; Taha, A.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.E.; Shehata, A.M.; Tan, C.; Kharazmi, M.S.; Li, Y.; Assadpour, E.; Castro-Muñoz, R. Bioactive-Loaded Nanodelivery Systems for the Feed and Drugs of Livestock; Purposes, Techniques and Applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 308, 102772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tahir, A.; Shabir Ahmad, R.; Imran, M.; Ahmad, M.H.; Kamran Khan, M.; Muhammad, N.; Nisa, M.U.; Tahir Nadeem, M.; Yasmin, A.; Tahir, H.S. Recent Approaches for Utilization of Food Components as Nano-Encapsulation: A Review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2021, 24, 1074–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Park, H.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, S.; Ha, E.-S.; Kim, M.-S.; Hwang, S.-J. Pharmaceutical Applications of Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Emulsions for Micro-/Nanoparticle Formation. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Franceschini, E.A.; Giménez, G.; Lombardo, M.V.; Zelcer, A.; Soler-Illia, G.J.A.A. Nanoencapsulation of Isotropic and Anisotropic Particles through a Green Chemistry Aerosol Method: A Scalable Approach for Ad-Hoc Surface Tuning. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2022, 102, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Han, S.Y.; Lee, H.; Nguyen, D.T.; Yun, G.; Kim, S.; Park, J.H.; Choi, I.S. Single-Cell Nanoencapsulation of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae by Cytocompatible Layer-by-Layer Assembly of Eggshell Membrane Hydrolysate and Tannic Acid. Adv. NanoBio. Res. 2021, 1, 2000037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jayaprakash, P.; Maudhuit, A.; Gaiani, C.; Desobry, S. Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds Using Competitive Emerging Techniques: Electrospraying, Nano Spray Drying, and Electrostatic Spray Drying. J. Food Eng. 2023, 339, 111260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vázquez-León, L.A.; Aparicio-Saguilán, A.; Martínez-Medinilla, R.M.; Utrilla-Coello, R.G.; Toruco-Uco, J.G.; Carpintero-Tepole, V.; Páramo-Calderón, D.E. Physicochemical and morphological characterization of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) starch and potential application in nano-encapsulation by spray drying. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Khairnar, S.V.; Pagare, P.; Thakre, A.; Nambiar, A.R.; Junnuthula, V.; Abraham, M.C.; Kolimi, P.; Nyavanandi, D.; Dyawanapelly, S. Review on the Scale-Up Methods for the Preparation of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Buljeta, I.; Pichler, A.; Šimunović, J.; Kopjar, M. Polysaccharides as Carriers of Polyphenols: Comparison of Freeze-Drying and Spray-Drying as Encapsulation Techniques. Molecules 2022, 27, 5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Greque De Morais, M.; Pires Alvarenga, A.G.; Vaz Da Silva, B.; Vieira Costa, J.A. Nanoencapsulation of Spirulina Biomass by Electrospraying for Development of Functional Foods a Review. Biotechnol. Res. Innov 2021, 5, e2021009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ibrahim, A.; Moodley, D.; Uche, C.; Maboza, E.; Olivier, A.; Petrik, L. Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activity of Electrosprayed Chitosan Nanoparticles against Endodontic Pathogens and Balb/c 3T3 Fibroblast Cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chen, C.; Liu, W.; Jiang, P.; Hong, T. Coaxial Electrohydrodynamic Atomization for the Production of Drug-Loaded Micro/Nanoparticles. Micromachines 2019, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Schoeller, J.; Itel, F.; Wuertz-Kozak, K.; Fortunato, G.; Rossi, R.M. PH-Responsive Electrospun Nanofibers and Their Applications. Polym. Rev. 2022, 62, 351–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yoda, M.; Garden, J.-L.; Bourgeois, O.; Haque, A.; Kumar, A.; Deyhle, H.; Hieber, S.; Müller, B.; Cano-Sarabia, M.; Maspoch, D. Nano(Evenescent-Wave)-Particle Image Velocimetry. In Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology; Bhushan, B., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; p. 1485. ISBN 978-90-481-9750-7. [Google Scholar]
  81. Gupta, V.; Biswas, D.; Roy, S. A Comprehensive Review of Biodegradable Polymer-Based Films and Coatings and Their Food Packaging Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 5899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alhnan, M.A.; Kidia, E.; Basit, A.W. Spray-drying enteric polymers from aqueous solutions: A novel, economic, and environmentally friendly approach to produce pH-responsive microparticles. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 79, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Luo, Y.; Ning, T.; Pei, Y.; Feng, X.; Zhang, S.; Lu, B.; Wang, L. High-performance and tailored honeycombed Ag nanowire networks fabricated by a novel electrospray assisted etching process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 571, 151081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bensid, A.; El Abed, N.; Houicher, A.; Regenstein, J.M.; Özogul, F. Antioxidant and antimicrobial preservatives: Properties, mechanism of action and applications in food—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2985–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ofosu, F.K.; Daliri, E.B.M.; Elahi, F.; Chelliah, R.; Lee, B.H.; Oh, D.H. New insights on the use of polyphenols as natural preservatives and their emerging safety concerns. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 525810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ahmed, T.M.K. Side Effects of Preservatives on Human Life. Sci. Res. J. Pharm. 2022, 2, 5. [Google Scholar]
  87. Al-Maqtari, Q.A.; Rehman, A.; Mahdi, A.A.; Al-Ansi, W.; Wei, M.; Yanyu, Z.; Phyo, H.M.; Galeboe, O.; Yao, W. Application of essential oils as preservatives in food systems: Challenges and future prospectives—A review. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 21, 1209–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Batiha, G.E.S.; Hussein, D.E.; Algammal, A.M.; George, T.T.; Jeandet, P.; Al-Snafi, A.E.; Tiwari, A.; Pagnossa, J.P.; Lima, C.M.; Thorat, N.D.; et al. Application of natural antimicrobials in food preservation: Recent views. Food Control 2021, 126, 108066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Padovano, M.; Aromatario, M.; D’Errico, S.; Concato, M.; Manetti, F.; David, M.C.; Scopetti, M.; Frati, P.; Fineschi, V. Sodium Nitrite Intoxication and Death: Summarizing Evidence to Facilitate Diagnosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Shakil, M.H.; Trisha, A.T.; Rahman, M.; Talukdar, S.; Kobun, R.; Huda, N.; Zzaman, W. Nitrites in cured meats, health risk issues, alternatives to nitrites: A review. Foods 2022, 11, 3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kumari, P.K.; Akhila, S.; Rao, Y.S.; Devi, B.R. Alternative to artificial preservatives. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2019, 10, 99–102. [Google Scholar]
  92. Gupta, M.K.; Basavaraj, G.V. Sulphites in food & drinks in asthmatic adults & children: What we need to know. Indian J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021, 35, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mitra, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Paul, N.; Ghosh, S.; Das, M. An Overview of Endocrine Disrupting Chemical Paraben and Search for An Alternative–A Review. In Proceedings of the Zoological Society; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2021; Volume 74, pp. 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Martínez-Ballesta, M.; Gil-Izquierdo, Á.; García-Viguera, C.; Domínguez-Perles, R. Nanoparticles and Controlled Delivery for Bioactive Compounds: Outlining Challenges for New “Smart-Foods” for Health. Foods 2018, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Chaudhari, A.K.; Dwivedy, A.K.; Singh, V.K.; Das, S.; Singh, A.; Dubey, N.K. Essential oils and their bioactive compounds as green preservatives against fungal and mycotoxin contamination of food commodities with special reference to their nanoencapsulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 25414–25431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Weaver, C.M. Role of Dairy Beverages in the Diet. Physiol. Behav. 2010, 100, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Van de Langerijt, T.M.; James, A.O.M.; Shane, V.C. Structural, Binding and Functional Properties of Milk Protein-Polyphenol Systems: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Silva, S.; Veiga, M.; Costa, E.; Oliveira, A.; Madureira, A.; Pintado, M. Nanoencapsulation of Polyphenols towards Dairy Beverage Incorporation. Beverages 2018, 4, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Bedoya-Serna, C.M.; Dacanal, G.C.; Fernandes, A.M.; Pinho, S.C. Antifungal Activity of Nanoemulsions Encapsulating Oregano (Origanum Vulgare) Essential Oil: In Vitro Study and Application in Minas Padrão Cheese. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Budryn, G.; Zaczyńska, D.; Oracz, J. Effect of Addition of Green Coffee Extract and Nanoencapsulated Chlorogenic Acids on Aroma of Different Food Products. LWT 2016, 73, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tavakoli, H.; Hosseini, O.; Jafari, S.M.; Katouzian, I. Evaluation of Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Yogurt Enriched by Olive Leaf Phenolics within Nanoliposomes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 9231–9240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Delshadi, R.; Bahrami, A.; Tafti, A.G.; Barba, F.J.; Williams, L.L. Micro and Nano-Encapsulation of Vegetable and Essential Oils to Develop Functional Food Products with Improved Nutritional Profiles. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 104, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Di Maio, G.; Pittia, P.; Mazzarino, L.; Maraschin, M.; Kuhnen, S. Cow Milk Enriched with Nanoencapsulated Phenolic Extract of Jaboticaba (Plinia Peruviana). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pudtikajorn, K.; Sae-leaw, T.; Benjakul, S. Characterization of Fortified Pasteurized Cow Milk with Nanoliposome Loaded with Skipjack Tuna Eyeball Oil. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 5893–5903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Sharifan, P.; Hassanzadeh, E.; Mohammadi Bajgiran, M.; Dabbagh, V.R.; Aminifar, E.; Ghazizadeh, H.; Saffar Soflaei, S.; Darroudi, S.; Tanbakouchi, D. Effects of Vitamin D3 Fortified Low-Fat Dairy Products on Bone Density Measures in Adults with Abdominal Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. ABJS 2022, 10, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sharifan, P.; Bagherniya, M.; Bajgiran, M.M.; Safarian, M.; Vatanparast, H.; Eslami, S.; Tayefi, M.; Khadem-Rezaiyan, M.; Baygan, A.; Khoshakhlagh, M. The Efficacy of Dairy Products Fortified with Nano-Encapsulated Vitamin D3 on Physical and Mental Aspects of the Health in Obese Subjects; the Protocol of the SUVINA Trial. Transl. Metab. Syndr. Res. 2021, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Taghizadeh, N.; Sharifan, P.; Ekhteraee Toosi, M.S.; Najar Sedgh Doust, F.; Darroudi, S.; Afshari, A.; Rezaie, M.; Safarian, M.; Vatanparast, H.; Eslami, S. The Effects of Consuming a Low-Fat Yogurt Fortified with Nano Encapsulated Vitamin D on Serum pro-Oxidant-Antioxidant Balance (PAB) in Adults with Metabolic Syndrome; a Randomized Control Trial. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2021, 15, 102332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dutra, T.V.; de Menezes, J.L.; Mizuta, A.G.; De Oliveira, A.; Moreira, T.F.M.; Barros, L.; Mandim, F.; Pereira, C.; Gonçalves, O.H.; Leimann, F.V. Use of Nanoencapsulated Curcumin against Vegetative Cells and Spores of Alicyclobacillus spp. in Industrialized Orange Juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 360, 109442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mahmoud, K.F.; Ali, H.S.; Amin, A.A. Nanoencapsulation of Bioactive Compounds Extracted from Egyptian Prickly Pears Peel Fruit: Antioxidant and Their Application in Guava Juice. Asian J. Sci. Res. 2018, 11, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Nour Solim, T.; Farrag Far, A.; Abdel-Hady, H.; EL-Hossien, M. Preparation and Properties Nano-Encapsulated Wheat Germ Oil and Its Use in the Manufacture of Functional Labneh Cheese. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 22, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Moghadam, F.V.; Pourahmad, R.; Mortazavi, A.; Davoodi, D.; Azizinezhad, R. Use of Fish Oil Nanoencapsulated with Gum Arabic Carrier in Low Fat Probiotic Fermented Milk. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2019, 39, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Gaber Ahmed, G.H.; Fernández-González, A.; Díaz García, M.E. Nano-Encapsulation of Grape and Apple Pomace Phenolic Extract in Chitosan and Soy Protein via Nanoemulsification. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 105806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pereira, P.M.d.C.C.; Vicente, A.F.d.R.B. Meat Nutritional Composition and Nutritive Role in the Human Diet. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Ulloa-Saavedra, A.; García-Betanzos, C.; Zambrano-Zaragoza, M.; Quintanar-Guerrero, D.; Mendoza-Elvira, S.; Velasco-Bejarano, B. Recent Developments and Applications of Nanosystems in the Preservation of Meat and Meat Products. Foods 2022, 11, 2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Amiri, N.; Afsharmanesh, M.; Salarmoini, M.; Meimandipour, A.; Hosseini, S.A.; Ebrahimnejad, H. Effects of Nanoencapsulated Cumin Essential Oil as an Alternative to the Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Broiler Diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2020, 29, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yaseen, A.; Gaafar, K.; Abou-elkhaire, R. Influence of Nano Encapsulated Essential Oils on Broiler Performance: An Overview. J. Curr. Vet. Res. 2022, 4, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dani, M.; Rusman, R.; Zuprizal, Z. The Influence of Nano-Encapsulation of Melastoma malabathricum L. Fruit Extract to Lipid Profile of Broiler Chicken. BuletinPeternak 2019, 43, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Badran, A. Effect of dietary curcumin and curcumin nanoparticles supplementation on growth performance, immune response and antioxidant of broilers chickens. EPSJ 2020, 40, 325–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Amiri, N.; Afsharmanesh, M.; Salarmoini, M.; Meimandipour, A.; Hosseini, S.A.; Ebrahimnejad, H. Nanoencapsulation (in Vitro and in Vivo) as an Efficient Technology to Boost the Potential of Garlic Essential Oil as Alternatives for Antibiotics in Broiler Nutrition. Animal 2021, 15, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. El-Gogary, M.R.; El-Khateeb, A.Y.; Megahed, A.M. Effect of physiological and chemical nano garlic supplementation on broiler chickens. Plant Arch. 2019, 19, 695–705. [Google Scholar]
  121. Ahmadi, M.; Ahmadian, A.; Seidavi, A.R. Effect of Different Levels of Nano-Selenium on Performance, Blood Parameters, Immunity and Carcass Characteristics of Broiler Chickens. PSJ 2018, 6, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Nouri, A. Chitosan Nano-Encapsulation Improves the Effects of Mint, Thyme, and Cinnamon Essential Oils in Broiler Chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2019, 60, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zuprizal, Z.; Ningsih, N.; Zulfian, T.A. The Effect of Nano-Encapsulation Phaleria Macrocarpa Fruits Extract in Drinking Water on the Digestive Tract and Carcass Characteristic of Broiler Chickens. BuletinPeternak 2020, 44, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ahmadabadi, L.R.; Hosseini, S.E.; Seyedein Ardebili, S.M.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Application of Clove Essential Oil-Loaded Nanoemulsions in Coating of Chicken Fillets. Food Meas. 2022, 16, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hasani, S.; Ojagh, S.M.; Ghorbani, M.; Hasani, M. Nano-Encapsulation of Lemon Essential Oil Approach to Reducing the Oxidation Process in Fish Burger during Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Biosci. Technol. 2020, 10, 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  126. Homayounpour, P.; Alizadeh Sani, M.; Shariatifar, N. Application of nano-encapsulated Allium sativum L. essential oil to increase the shelf life of hamburger at refrigerated temperature with analysis of microbial and physical properties. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kazemeini, H.; Azizian, A.; Adib, H. Inhibition of Listeria Monocytogenes Growth in Turkey Fillets by Alginate Edible Coating with Trachyspermum Ammi Essential Oil Nano-Emulsion. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 344, 109104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pabast, M.; Shariatifar, N.; Beikzadeh, S.; Jahed, G. Effects of Chitosan Coatings Incorporating with Free or Nano-Encapsulated Satureja Plant Essential Oil on Quality Characteristics of Lamb Meat. Food Control 2018, 91, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ojha, K.S.; Perussello, C.A.; García, C.Á.; Kerry, J.P.; Pando, D.; Tiwari, B.K. Ultrasonic-Assisted Incorporation of Nano-Encapsulated Omega-3 Fatty Acids to Enhance the Fatty Acid Profile of Pork Meat. Meat Sci. 2017, 132, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Hădărugă, N.G.; Chirilă, C.A.; Szakal, R.N.; Gălan, I.M.; Simandi, M.D.; Bujancă, G.S.; David, I.; Riviş, A.; Stanciu, S.M.; Hădărugă, D.I. FTIR–PCA Approach on Raw and Thermally Processed Chicken Lipids Stabilized by Nano-Encapsulation in β-Cyclodextrin. Foods 2022, 11, 3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Elbarbary, A.M.; El-Sawy, N.M.; Hegazy, E.-S.A. Antioxidative Properties of Irradiated Chitosan/Vitamin C Complex and Their Use as Food Additive for Lipid Storage. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yarmohammadi Barbarestani, S.; Samadi, F.; Hassani, S.; Asadi, G. Effects of Encapsulated Nano- and Microparticles of Peppermint (Mentha piperita) Alcoholic Extract on the Growth Performance, Blood Parameters and Immune Function of Broilers under Heat Stress Condition. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2017, 7, 669–677. [Google Scholar]
  133. Yousefdoost, S.; Samadi, F.; Jafari, S.M.; Ramezanpour, S.S.; Hassani, S.; Ganji, F. Application of Nanoencapsulated Silymarin to Improve Its Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activities against Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Oxidative Stress in Broiler Chickens. Livest. Sci. 2019, 228, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Abbasi, F.; Samadi, F.; Jafari, S.M.; Ramezanpour, S.; Shams-Shargh, M. Production of Omega-3 Fatty Acid-Enriched Broiler Chicken Meat by the Application of Nanoencapsultsed Flaxseed Oil Prepared via Ultrasonication. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 57, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sarvinehbaghi, M.B.; Ahmadi, M.; Shiran, M.; Azizkhani, M. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Red Onion (Allium cepa L.) Extract Nanoencapsulated in Native Seed Gums Coating and Its Effect on Shelf-Life Extension of Beef Fillet. Food Meas. 2021, 15, 4771–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Rahnemoon, P.; Sarabi-Jamab, M.; Bostan, A.; Mansouri, E. Nano-Encapsulation of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel extract and evaluation of its antimicrobial properties on coated chicken meat. Food Biosci. 2021, 43, 101331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hadian, M.; Rajaei, A.; Mohsenifar, A.; Tabatabaei, M. Encapsulation of Rosmarinus Officinalis Essential Oils in Chitosan-Benzoic Acid Nanogel with Enhanced Antibacterial Activity in Beef Cutlet against Salmonella Typhimurium during Refrigerated Storage. LWT 2017, 84, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Shi, J.; Huang, X.; Zou, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhai, X.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, Y. Preparation and Comparison of Two Functional Nanoparticle-Based Bilayers Reinforced with a κ-Carrageenan–Anthocyanin Complex. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ghaderi-Ghahfarokhi, M.; Barzegar, M.; Sahari, M.A.; Azizi, M.H. Nanoencapsulation Approach to Improve Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Thyme Essential Oil in Beef Burgers During Refrigerated Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 1187–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gharibzahedi, S.M.T.; Mohammadnabi, S. Effect of Novel Bioactive Edible Coatings Based on Jujube Gum and Nettle Oil-Loaded Nanoemulsions on the Shelf-Life of Beluga Sturgeon Fillets. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Ding, W. Eugenol Nanocapsules Embedded with Gelatin-Chitosan for Chilled Pork Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Tometri, S.S.; Ahmady, M.; Ariaii, P.; Soltani, M.S. Extraction and Encapsulation of Laurus Nobilis Leaf Extract with Nano-Liposome and Its Effect on Oxidative, Microbial, Bacterial and Sensory Properties of Minced Beef. Food Meas. 2020, 14, 3333–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Brandelli, A.; Brum, L.F.W.; Dos Santos, J.H.Z. Nanostructured Bioactive Compounds for Ecological Food Packaging. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 15, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cui, H.; Bai, M.; Lin, L. Plasma-Treated Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers Containing Tea Tree Oil/Beta-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex for Antibacterial Packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 179, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Karimifar, P.; Saei-Dehkordi, S.S.; Izadi, Z. Antibacterial, Antioxidative and Sensory Properties of Ziziphora Clinopodioides–Rosmarinus Officinalis Essential Oil Nanoencapsulated Using Sodium Alginate in Raw Lamb Burger Patties. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Lin, L.; Mao, X.; Sun, Y.; Rajivgandhi, G.; Cui, H. Antibacterial Properties of Nanofibers Containing Chrysanthemum Essential Oil and Their Application as Beef Packaging. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 292, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Magalhães Brandão, R.; Roberto Batista, L.; Elvis de Oliveira, J.; Bispo Barbosa, R.; Lee Nelson, D.; Graças Cardoso, M. In Vitro and in Vivo Efficacy of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanofiber Packaging Containing Essential Oils from Ocimum basilicum L. and Ocimum gratissimum L. Against Aspergillus Carbonarius Aspergillus Niger Table Grapes. Food Chem. 2023, 400, 134087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zeng, J.; Ji, Q.; Liu, X.; Yuan, M.; Yuan, M.; Qin, Y. Electrospun Polylactic Acid/Poly (ε-Caprolactone) Fibrous Encapsulated Thymol/MIL-68(Al) as a Food Packaging Material. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 5032–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Álvarez-Hernández, M.H.; Martínez-Hernández, G.B.; Castillejo, N.; Martínez, J.A.; Artés-Hernández, F. Development of an Antifungal Active Packaging Containing Thymol and an Ethylene Scavenger. Valid. Dur. Storage Cherry Tomatoes. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. de Carvalho, S.M.; Noronha, C.M.; da Rosa, C.G.; Sganzerla, W.G.; Bellettini, I.C.; Nunes, M.R.; Bertoldi, F.C.; Manique Barreto, P.L. PVA Antioxidant Nanocomposite Films Functionalized with Alpha-Tocopherol Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 581, 123793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lei, Y.; Yao, Q.; Jin, Z.; Wang, Y.-C. Intelligent Films Based on Pectin, Sodium Alginate, Cellulose Nanocrystals, and Anthocyanins for Monitoring Food Freshness. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Kamkar, A.; Molaee-Aghaee, E.; Khanjari, A.; Akhondzadeh-Basti, A.; Noudoost, B.; Shariatifar, N.; Alizadeh Sani, M.; Soleimani, M. Nanocomposite Active Packaging Based on Chitosan Biopolymer Loaded with Nano-Liposomal Essential Oil: Its Characterizations and Effects on Microbial, and Chemical Properties of Refrigerated Chicken Breast Fillet. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 342, 109071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. López-Gómez, A.; Navarro-Martínez, A.; Martínez-Hernández, G.B. Active Paper Sheets Including Nanoencapsulated Essential Oils: A Green Packaging Technique to Control Ethylene Production and Maintain Quality in Fresh Horticultural Products—A Case Study on Flat Peaches. Foods 2020, 9, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Aydogdu, A.; Sumnu, G.; Sahin, S. Fabrication of Gallic Acid Loaded Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Nanofibers by Electrospinning Technique as Active Packaging Material. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 208, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Schmatz, D.A.; Costa, J.A.V.; Morais, d.M.G. A Novel Nanocomposite for Food Packaging Developed by Electrospinning and Electrospraying. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 20, 100314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Xavier, L.O.; Sganzerla, W.G.; Rosa, G.B.; da Rosa, C.G.; Agostinetto, L.; Veeck, A.P.d.L.; Bretanha, L.C.; Micke, G.A.; Dalla Costa, M.; Bertoldi, F.C.; et al. Chitosan Packaging Functionalized with Cinnamodendron Dinisii Essential Oil Loaded Zein: A Proposal for Meat Conservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, L.; Xia, L.; Xiao, F.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, L.; Jiang, S.; Wang, H. Colorimetric Active Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Oxidized Sodium Alginate-Oxalis Triangularis Ssp. Papilionacea Anthocyanins Film@gelatin/Zein-Linalool Membrane for Milk Freshness Monitoring and Preservation. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hua, L.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, B.; Ma, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, B. Improving the Functionality of Chitosan-Based Packaging Films by Crosslinking with Nanoencapsulated Clove Essential Oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Li, M.; Yu, H.; Xie, Y.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, H.; Yao, W. Fabrication of Eugenol Loaded Gelatin Nanofibers by Electrospinning Technique as Active Packaging Material. LWT 2021, 139, 110800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Eghbalian, M.; Shavisi, N.; Shahbazi, Y.; Dabirian, F. Active Packaging Based on Sodium Caseinate-Gelatin Nanofiber Mats Encapsulated with Mentha spicata L. Essential Oil and MgO Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties, and Food Application. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sharif, N.; Golmakani, M.-T.; Hajjari, M.M.; Aghaee, E.; Ghasemi, J.B. Antibacterial Cuminaldehyde/Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex Electrospun Fibers Mat: Fabrication and Characterization. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. McDaniel, A.; Tonyali, B.; Yucel, U.; Trinetta, V. Formulation and Development of Lipid Nanoparticle Antifungal Packaging Films to Control Postharvest Disease. J. Agric. Food Res. 2019, 1, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Munhuweyi, K.; Caleb, O.J.; van Reenen, A.J.; Opara, U.L. Physical and Antifungal Properties of β-Cyclodextrin Microcapsules and Nanofibre Films Containing Cinnamon and Oregano Essential Oils. LWT 2018, 87, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Dehcheshmeh, M.A.; Fathi, M. Production of Core-Shell Nanofibers from Zein and Tragacanth for Encapsulation of Saffron Extract. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hadavi, R.; Jafari, S.M.; Katouzian, I. Nanoliposomal Encapsulation of Saffron Bioactive Compounds; Characterization and Optimization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4046–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Jain, A.; Dasgupta, N.; Ranjan, S.; Singh, V.; Singh, H.; Purohit, S.D.; Mishra, N.C.; Yadav, N.P.; Haque, S.; Mishra, B.N. Whey Protein Based Electrosprayed Nanospheres for Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Bioactive Compounds from Tinospora Cordifolia Extract. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 69, 102671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Drosou, C.; Krokida, M.; Biliaderis, C.G. Encapsulation of β-Carotene into Food-Grade Nanofibers via Coaxial Electrospinning of Hydrocolloids: Enhancement of Oxidative Stability and Photoprotection. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 133, 107949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Peng, S.; Li, Z.; Zou, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, C.; McClements, D.J. Improving Curcumin Solubility and Bioavailability by Encapsulation in Saponin-Coated Curcumin Nanoparticles Prepared Using a Simple PH-Driven Loading Method. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 1829–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zheng, B.; Peng, S.; Zhang, X.; McClements, D.J. Impact of Delivery System Type on Curcumin Bioaccessibility: Comparison of Curcumin-Loaded Nanoemulsions with Commercial Curcumin Supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 10816–10826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Bateni, Z.; Behrouz, V.; Rahimi, H.R.; Hedayati, M.; Afsharian, S.; Sohrab, G. Effects of Nano-Curcumin Supplementation on Oxidative Stress, Systemic Inflammation, Adiponectin, and NF-ΚB in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J. Herb. Med. 2022, 31, 100531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Mauri, E.; Gori, M.; Giannitelli, S.M.; Zancla, A.; Mozetic, P.; Abbruzzese, F.; Merendino, N.; Gigli, G.; Rossi, F.; Trombetta, M.; et al. Nano-Encapsulation of Hydroxytyrosol into Formulated Nanogels Improves Therapeutic Effects against Hepatic Steatosis: An in Vitro Study. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 124, 112080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Jiang, L.; Wang, F.; Du, M.; Xie, C.; Xie, X.; Zhang, H.; Meng, X.; Li, A.; Deng, T. Encapsulation of Catechin into Nano-Cyclodextrin-Metal-Organic Frameworks: Preparation, Characterization, and Evaluation of Storage Stability and Bioavailability. Food Chem. 2022, 394, 133553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H. Nanoformulations of Quercetin and Cellulose Nanofibers as Healthcare Supplements with Sustained Antioxidant Activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Raeisi, S.; Ojagh, S.M.; Quek, S.Y.; Pourashouri, P.; Salaün, F. Nano-Encapsulation of Fish Oil and Garlic Essential Oil by a Novel Composition of Wall Material: Persian Gum-Chitosan. LWT 2019, 116, 108494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Xiang, C.; Gao, J.; Ye, H.; Ren, G.; Ma, X.; Xie, H.; Fang, S.; Lei, Q.; Fang, W. Development of Ovalbumin-Pectin Nanocomplexes for Vitamin D3 Encapsulation: Enhanced Storage Stability and Sustained Release in Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 106, 105926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhang, X.; Song, R.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Wei, R. Fabrication of Vitamin D3 Nanoemulsions Stabilized by Tween 80 and Span 80 as a Composite Surface-Active Surfactant: Characterization and Stability. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 645, 128873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Baek, J.; Ramasamy, M.; Willis, N.C.; Kim, D.S.; Anderson, W.A.; Tam, K.C. Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Vitamin C in Modified Cellulose Nanocrystal/Chitosan Nanocapsules. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2021, 4, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Parthasarathi, S.; Muthukumar, S.P.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. The Influence of Droplet Size on the Stability, in Vivo Digestion, and Oral Bioavailability of Vitamin E Emulsions. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 2294–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Resende, D.; Costa Lima, S.A.; Reis, S. Nanoencapsulation Approaches for Oral Delivery of Vitamin A. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2020, 193, 111121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sharmila, D.J.S.; Lakshmanan, A. Molecular Dynamics Study of Plant Bioactive Nutraceutical Keto-Curcumin Encapsulated in Medium Chain Triglyceride Oil-in-Water Nanoemulsion That Are Stabilized by Globular Whey Proteins. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 362, 119753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Chaves, M.A.; Baldino, L.; Pinho, S.C.; Reverchon, E. Co-Encapsulation of Curcumin and Vitamin D3 in Mixed Phospholipid Nanoliposomes Using a Continuous Supercritical CO2 Assisted Process. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2022, 132, 104120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ghayour, N.; Hosseini, S.M.H.; Eskandari, M.H.; Esteghlal, S.; Nekoei, A.-R.; Hashemi Gahruie, H.; Tatar, M.; Naghibalhossaini, F. Nanoencapsulation of Quercetin and Curcumin in Casein-Based Delivery Systems. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. da Silva, J.L.G.; Passos, D.F.; Bernardes, V.M.; Cabral, F.L.; Schimites, P.G.; Manzoni, A.G.; de Oliveira, E.G.; de Bona da Silva, C.; Beck, R.C.R.; Jantsch, M.H. Co-Nanoencapsulation of Vitamin D3 and Curcumin Regulates Inflammation and Purine Metabolism in a Model of Arthritis. Inflammation 2019, 42, 1595–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Ge, J.; Yue, P.; Chi, J.; Liang, J.; Gao, X. Formation and Stability of Anthocyanins-Loaded Nanocomplexes Prepared with Chitosan Hydrochloride and Carboxymethyl Chitosan. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 74, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Sreerekha, P.R.; Dara, P.K.; Vijayan, D.K.; Chatterjee, N.S.; Raghavankutty, M.; Mathew, S.; Ravishankar, C.N.; Anandan, R. Dietary Supplementation of Encapsulated Anthocyanin Loaded-Chitosan Nanoparticles Attenuates Hyperlipidemic Aberrations in Male Wistar Rats. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Moon, H.; Lertpatipanpong, P.; Hong, Y.; Kim, C.-T.; Baek, S.J. Nano-Encapsulated Quercetin by Soluble Soybean Polysaccharide/Chitosan Enhances Anti-Cancer, Anti-Inflammation, and Anti-Oxidant Activities. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 87, 104756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Hao, J.; Guo, B.; Yu, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Encapsulation of the Flavonoid Quercetin with Chitosan-Coated Nano-Liposomes. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 85, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Ahmad, M.; Mudgil, P.; Gani, A.; Hamed, F.; Masoodi, F.A.; Maqsood, S. Nano-Encapsulation of Catechin in Starch Nanoparticles: Characterization, Release Behavior and Bioactivity Retention during Simulated in-Vitro Digestion. Food Chem. 2019, 270, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Yang, R.; Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Blanchard, C.; Zhou, Z. Nano-Encapsulation of Epigallocatechin Gallate in the Ferritin-Chitosan Double Shells: Simulated Digestion and Absorption Evaluation. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Chaari, M.; Theochari, I.; Papadimitriou, V.; Xenakis, A.; Ammar, E. Encapsulation of Carotenoids Extracted from Halophilic Archaea in Oil-in-Water (O/W) Micro- and Nano-Emulsions. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 161, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Salvia-Trujillo, L.; McClements, D.J. Improvement of β-Carotene Bioaccessibility from Dietary Supplements Using Excipient Nanoemulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4639–4647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Liu, X.; Wang, P.; Zou, Y.-X.; Luo, Z.-G.; Tamer, T.M. Co-Encapsulation of Vitamin C and β-Carotene in Liposomes: Storage Stability, Antioxidant Activity, and in Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Jia, D.; Barwal, I.; Thakur, S.; Yadav, S.C. Methodology to Nanoencapsulate Hepatoprotective Components from Picrorhiza Kurroa as Food Supplement. Food Biosci. 2015, 9, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Machado, A.R.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Vicente, A.A.; Souza-Soares, L.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Liposomes Loaded with Phenolic Extracts of Spirulina LEB-18: Physicochemical Characterization and Behavior under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions. Food Res. Int. 2019, 120, 656–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Koo, S.Y.; Mok, I.-K.; Pan, C.-H.; Kim, S.M. Preparation of Fucoxanthin-Loaded Nanoparticles Composed of Casein and Chitosan with Improved Fucoxanthin Bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 9428–9435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Faridi Esfanjani, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Assadpour, E. Preparation of a Multiple Emulsion Based on Pectin-Whey Protein Complex for Encapsulation of Saffron Extract Nanodroplets. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1962–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Salt, L.J.; Ridout, M.J.; Ding, Y.; Wilde, P.J. Fish Oil Emulsions Stabilized with Caseinate Glycated by Dextran: Physicochemical Stability and Gastrointestinal Fate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Serini, S.; Cassano, R.; Corsetto, P.; Rizzo, A.; Calviello, G.; Trombino, S. Omega-3 PUFA Loaded in Resveratrol-Based Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: Physicochemical Properties and Antineoplastic Activities in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Remila, L.; Belcastro, E.; Guenday-Tuereli, N.; Park, S.; Houngue, U.; Vandamme, T.; Tuereli, E.; Kerth, P.; Auger, C.; Schini-Kerth, V. Nanoencapsulation of the Omega-3 EPA:DHA 6:1 Formulation Enhances and Sustains NO-Mediated Endothelium-Dependent Relaxations in Coronary Artery Rings and NO Formation in Endothelial Cells. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 87, 104851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Atraki, R.; Azizkhani, M. Survival of Probiotic Bacteria Nanoencapsulated within Biopolymers in a Simulated Gastrointestinal Model. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 72, 102750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Hosny, K.M.; Bahmdan, R.H.; Alhakamy, N.A.; Alfaleh, M.A.; Ahmed, O.A.; Elkomy, M.H. Physically Optimized Nano-Lipid Carriers Augment Raloxifene and Vitamin D Oral Bioavailability in Healthy Humans for Management of Osteoporosis. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 109, 2145–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Jan, Y.; Al-Keridis, L.A.; Malik, M.; Haq, A.; Ahmad, S.; Kaur, J.; Adnan, M.; Alshammari, N.; Ashraf, S.A.; Panda, B.P. Preparation, Modelling, Characterization and Release Profile of Vitamin D3 Nanoemulsion. LWT 2022, 169, 113980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Park, S.J.; Garcia, C.V.; Shin, G.H.; Kim, J.T. Development of Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for the Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Vitamin D3. Food Chem. 2017, 225, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Talebi, V.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Hamishehkar, H.; Pezeshki, A.; Ostadrahimi, A. Effects of Different Stabilizers on Colloidal Properties and Encapsulation Efficiency of Vitamin D3 Loaded Nano-Niosomes. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 61, 101284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Hassane Hamadou, A.; Huang, W.-C.; Xue, C.; Mao, X. Formulation of Vitamin C Encapsulation in Marine Phospholipids Nanoliposomes: Characterization and Stability Evaluation during Long Term Storage. LWT 2020, 127, 109439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Azevedo, M.A.; Bourbon, A.I.; Vicente, A.A.; Cerqueira, M.A. Alginate/Chitosan Nanoparticles for Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Vitamin B2. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 71, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Penalva, R.; Esparza, I.; Agüeros, M.; Gonzalez-Navarro, C.J.; Gonzalez-Ferrero, C.; Irache, J.M. Casein Nanoparticles as Carriers for the Oral Delivery of Folic Acid. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 44, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Batinić, P.M.; Đorđević, V.B.; Stevanović, S.I.; Balanč, B.D.; Marković, S.B.; Luković, N.D.; Mijin, D.Ž.; Bugarski, B.M. Formulation and Characterization of Novel Liposomes Containing Histidine for Encapsulation of a Poorly Soluble Vitamin. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 59, 101920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Fu, X.; Chen, J. A review of hyperspectral imaging for chicken meat safety and quality evaluation: Application, hardware, and software. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  210. Zhao, L.; Kristi, N.; Ye, Z. Atomic force microscopy in food preservation research: New insights to overcome spoilage issues. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 110043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Chalklen, T.; Jing, Q.; Kar-Narayan, S. Biosensors based on mechanical and electrical detection techniques. Sensors 2020, 20, 5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Pavase, T.R.; Lin, H.; Hussain, S.; Li, Z.; Ahmed, I.; Lv, L.; Sun, L.; Shah, S.B.H.; Kalhoro, M.T. Recent advances of conjugated polymer (CP) nanocomposite-based chemical sensors and their applications in food spoilage detection: A comprehensive review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 1113–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Weston, M.; Geng, S.; Chandrawati, R. Food sensors: Challenges and opportunities. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021, 6, 2001242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Mathew, S.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. (Eds.) Nano-innovations in Food Packaging: Functions and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Srivastava, A.K.; Dev, A.; Karmakar, S. Nanosensors and nanobiosensors in food and agriculture. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Thakur, M.; Wang, B.; Verma, M.L. Development and applications of nanobiosensors for sustainable agricultural and food industries: Recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Kumar, A.; Choudhary, A.; Kaur, H.; Mehta, S.; Husen, A. Metal-based nanoparticles, sensors, and their multifaceted application in food packaging. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Borah, N.; Gogoi, D.; Ghosh, N.N.; Tamuly, C. GA-AuNP@ Tollens’ complex as a highly sensitive plasmonic nanosensor for detection of formaldehyde and benzaldehyde in preserved food products. Food Chem. 2023, 399, 133975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Mazur, F.; Tran, H.; Kuchel, R.P.; Chandrawati, R. Rapid Detection of Listeriolysin O Toxin Based on a Nanoscale Liposome–Gold Nanoparticle Platform. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 7270–7280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Weston, M.; Mazur, F.; Chandrawati, R. Monitoring of Food Spoilage Using Polydiacetylene-and Liposome-Based Sensors. Smart Sens. Environ. Med. Appl. 2020, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Soni, V.; Raizada, P.; Singh, P.; Cuong, H.N.; Rangabha, S.; Saini, A.; Saini, R.V.; Le, Q.V.; Nadda, A.K.; Le, T.-T.; et al. Sustainable and green trends in using plant extracts for the synthesis of biogenic metal nanoparticles toward environmental and pharmaceutical advances: A review. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Prasad, S.R.; Teli, S.B.; Ghosh, J.; Prasad, N.R.; Shaikh, V.S.; Nazeruddin, G.M.; Abdullah, G.A.; Imran, P.; Shaikh, Y.I. A review on bio-inspired synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Their antimicrobial efficacy and toxicity. Eng. Sci. 2021, 16, 90–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Vijayaram, S.; Razafindralambo, H.; Sun, Y.Z.; Vasantharaj, S.; Ghafarifarsani, H.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Raeeszadeh, M. Applications of Green Synthesized Metal Nanoparticles—A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Wypij, M.; Trzcińska-Wencel, J.; Golinska, P.; Avila-Quezada, G.D.; Avinash, P.I.; Rai, M. The strategic applications of natural polymer nanocomposites in food packaging and agriculture: Chances, challenges, and consumers’ perception. Front. Chem. 2023, 10, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Niu, L.; Li, Z.; Fan, W.; Zhong, X.; Peng, M.; Liu, Z. Nano-strategies for enhancing the bioavailability of tea polyphenols: Preparation, applications, and challenges. Foods 2022, 11, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Harish, V.; Tewari, D.; Gaur, M.; Yadav, A.B.; Swaroop, S.; Bechelany, M.; Barhoum, A. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: Bioimaging, biosensing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, antimicrobial, and agro-food applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Barhoum, A.; García-Betancourt, M.L.; Jeevanandam, J.; Hussien, E.A.; Mekkawy, S.A.; Mostafa, M.; Omran, M.M.; Abdalla, S.M.; Bechelany, M. Review on natural, incidental, bioinspired, and engineered nanomaterials: History, definitions, classifications, synthesis, properties, market, toxicities, risks, and regulations. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Ashraf, S.A.; Siddiqui, A.J.; Abd Elmoneim, O.E.; Khan, M.I.; Patel, M.; Alreshidi, M.; Moin, A.; Singh, R.; Snoussi, M.; Adnan, M. Innovations in nanoscience for the sustainable development of food and agriculture with implications on health and environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 768, 144990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Domingues, C.; Santos, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A.; Jarak, I.; Veiga, F.; Barbosa, I.; Dourado, M.; Figueiras, A. Where is nano today and where is it headed? A review of nanomedicine and the dilemma of nanotoxicology. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 9994–10041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Trivedi, R.; Shende, P. Nanotech-based Food: An Initiative for Alternative Pharmaceuticals. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2022, 23, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Keywords co-occurrence mapping of nanoencapsulation, bioactive compounds, preparation technique, and food industry. (Bibliometric data were extracted from the Scopus online database and elaborated by VOSviewer software (version 1.6.19, www.vosviewer.com accessed on 5 May 2023)).
Figure 1. Keywords co-occurrence mapping of nanoencapsulation, bioactive compounds, preparation technique, and food industry. (Bibliometric data were extracted from the Scopus online database and elaborated by VOSviewer software (version 1.6.19, www.vosviewer.com accessed on 5 May 2023)).
Processes 11 01459 g001
Figure 2. Lipids systems.
Figure 2. Lipids systems.
Processes 11 01459 g002
Figure 3. Structure of polymer systems.
Figure 3. Structure of polymer systems.
Processes 11 01459 g003
Figure 4. Principe of the chemical preparation methods: emulsion polymerizations (A), sol-gels (B), and precipitations (C).
Figure 4. Principe of the chemical preparation methods: emulsion polymerizations (A), sol-gels (B), and precipitations (C).
Processes 11 01459 g004
Figure 5. Coacervation and phase separation (A), inclusion complexes (B), and supercritical fluids (C).
Figure 5. Coacervation and phase separation (A), inclusion complexes (B), and supercritical fluids (C).
Processes 11 01459 g005
Figure 6. Significant physicomechanical strategies for nanoencapsulation: spray drying (A), electrospraying (B), and solvent evaporation/solvent extraction (C).
Figure 6. Significant physicomechanical strategies for nanoencapsulation: spray drying (A), electrospraying (B), and solvent evaporation/solvent extraction (C).
Processes 11 01459 g006
Figure 7. The five general areas covered by nanoencapsulation in the food sector and their benefits.
Figure 7. The five general areas covered by nanoencapsulation in the food sector and their benefits.
Processes 11 01459 g007
Table 1. Synthetic preservative side effects on human health.
Table 1. Synthetic preservative side effects on human health.
Synthetic PreservativeSide EffectsReference
Nitrates and nitritesMethemoglobin, loss of consciousness and death, especially in infants.[89]
Carcinogenic.[90]
Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and type 2 diabetes fatalities.[91]
Headache, sweating, redness of skin, nausea and weakness.
FormaldehydePotent irritants (skin, eye and lung).[91]
Sperm DNA damage
SulfitesSevere allergic reactions and asthma. [92]
ParabensNeurological damage (in rats), potent irritants, and allergens.[93]
Pregnant women’s exposure of certain toxic chemicals may have an adverse effect on embryonic brain development.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taouzinet, L.; Djaoudene, O.; Fatmi, S.; Bouiche, C.; Amrane-Abider, M.; Bougherra, H.; Rezgui, F.; Madani, K. Trends of Nanoencapsulation Strategy for Natural Compounds in the Food Industry. Processes 2023, 11, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051459

AMA Style

Taouzinet L, Djaoudene O, Fatmi S, Bouiche C, Amrane-Abider M, Bougherra H, Rezgui F, Madani K. Trends of Nanoencapsulation Strategy for Natural Compounds in the Food Industry. Processes. 2023; 11(5):1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taouzinet, Lamia, Ouarda Djaoudene, Sofiane Fatmi, Cilia Bouiche, Meriem Amrane-Abider, Hind Bougherra, Farouk Rezgui, and Khodir Madani. 2023. "Trends of Nanoencapsulation Strategy for Natural Compounds in the Food Industry" Processes 11, no. 5: 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop