Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of the Interaction between the Antiviral Drug Umifenovir and Umifenovir Encapsulated in Phospholipids Micelles (Nanosome/Umifenovir) with dsDNA as a Model for Pharmacogenomic Analysis by Electrochemical Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Survival Mechanisms and Cell Death Induction in Melanoma Following Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Meso-5,10,15,20-tetrakis-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-porphyrin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Potassium Ferrate as a Dewatering Conditioner on Sludge Pyrolysis Characteristics and the Releasing Characteristics of Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Chlorine during Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis

1
Chongqing Tuzhu Sewage Treatment Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401333, China
2
Chongqing Xiyong Sewage Treatment Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401333, China
3
Chongqing Drainage Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400012, China
4
Chongqing Green Karbon Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400050, China
5
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Water Environment Evolution and Pollution Control in Three Gorges Reservoir, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing 404020, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(3), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030920
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 13 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental and Green Processes)

Abstract

:
Sludge pyrolysis is a promising method for treating excess sludge as a by-product of municipal sewage plants, allowing for energy self-sufficiency and resource recovery. Before sludge pyrolysis begins, a few conditioning agents are added to the sludge that promote sludge dewatering. Potassium ferrate (K2FeO4) is applied as a conditioning agent with both cracking and flocculation effects, but the effects of K2FeO4 on the release characteristics of nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine during sludge pyrolysis have not been elucidated. In this study, we analyzed the sludge pyrolysis characteristics and chemical state changes of N, S, and Cl contaminants in the dewatered sludge after K2FeO4 conditioning before and after pyrolysis. Further, the release characteristics of condensable/noncondensable gases during pyrolysis were assessed using thermogravimetric mass spectrometry (TG-MS) and pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) analyses before and after conditioning. We found that potassium pertechnetate reduced the activation energy required for the sludge in the pyrolysis process. Noticeably this process made the sludge more susceptible to thermal decomposition leading to volatile production and also influenced the release of different contaminants generated by the pyrolysis process. Moreover, K2FeO4 promoted the release of C/H/O gases and reduced the release of N/S/Cl pollutant gases from the sludge. Overall, this study provides a theoretical basis for the selection of conditioning agents for the sludge conditioning and dewatering steps during the sludge pyrolysis process.

1. Introduction

Currently, a majority of municipal sewage treatment plants use the activated sludge method to treat sewage. The treatment process generates a large amount of sludge by-products with a complex composition, which is not only rich in nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, but also contains many harmful substances such as heavy metals, pest eggs, and fungi [1,2]. With the intensification of urbanization, the annual sludge production in China is expected to exceed 9 × 107 t by 2025, and the large amount of sludge produced has led to huge environmental problems [3]. If the sludge is not disposed of properly, it increases the risk of secondary environmental pollution [4].
The common methods of sludge disposal are landfilling, composting, incineration, and pyrolysis [5,6]. Landfilling of sludge carries the risk of contaminating groundwater, occupies a lot of site space, and has a low utilization rate [7]. While sludge composting is an effective method for the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients, it can contaminate soil with heavy metals. Zhang, et al. [8] found that the potential ecological risk of heavy metal mercury in compost is very high, and long-term sludge composting will have a cumulative adverse environmental impact. Incineration can markedly reduce the amount of sludge, but flue gas treatment is more difficult. Pyrolysis is currently the most promising treatment method, which produces biomass oil, gas, and char, all of which can be used [9,10]. Thus, the maximum resource utilization of sludge with the least environmental harm can be achieved using pyrolysis technology [11,12]. The water content of sludge is up to 99%, which affects its transportation and subsequent resource utilization [13]. Therefore, sludge dewatering plays an important role in its treatment and disposal.
Iron salts are a common class of sludge dewatering conditioners that are added to improve the sludge dewatering performance. Among the iron salts, potassium ferrate (K2FeO4) is widely used in sludge conditioning and dewatering because of its strong oxidizing and flocculating effects [14]. The hydrolysis of K2FeO4 produces Fe(OH)3, which makes sludge flocculate into agglomerates, reduces the stability of sludge, improves the settling performance, and thus increases the dewatering capacity of sludge [15]. Meanwhile, FeO42− possesses strong oxidizing properties that degrade the extracellular polymer substances (EPSs) of sludge. Specifically, iron ions neutralize the charge and help compress the EPS double layer, thus improving the dewatering effect [16].
A majority of sludge treatment studies involving K2FeO4 have primarily assessed its effect on sludge dewatering [17]. Further, it was reported that the addition of a new green conditioning agent K2FeO4 does not produce any toxic or harmful substances in the sludge [15]. Despite the conditioning agent facilitating the dewatering process, the remaining substances may affect the pyrolysis products of the sludge, especially the production of polluting gas [18]. Few studies have been conducted concerning the effect of sludge dewatering conditioners on sludge pyrolysis. Sludge conditioner mainly contain sludge disintegration conditioner [19], flocculating conditioner [7], and sludge skeleton builder [5]. Previous studies have focused on the effects of flocculating conditioner and sludge skeleton builder on sludge pyrolysis and the release of contaminant elements [5,20], while the effects of sludge disintegration conditioner on sludge pyrolysis have not been reported. Potassium ferrate (K2FeO4) is widely used in sludge conditioning and dewatering. In addition to flocculation, it has a certain disintegrating effect on sludge [15,16], organic matter such as proteins and sugars in sludge will be released into the liquid phase, and with the separation of dewatering and sludge dry matter, the properties of sludge before and after disintegration will be greatly changed, which may affect sludge pyrolysis.
Therefore, the effect of K2FeO4 as a sludge conditioning conditioner on sludge pyrolysis characteristics and the contaminant element release characteristics were investigated in this study. We investigated the effect of K2FeO4 on the evolution and release characteristics of N-, S-, and Cl-containing contaminants during sludge pyrolysis. Furthermore, we analyzed the dried sludge after K2FeO4 conditioning using the thermogravimetric mass spectrometry (TG-MS) and pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) methods. Several solid-state reaction models were used to perform a kinetic analysis of the pyrolysis process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Preparation

The experimental samples in this study were collected from the municipal surplus sludge of the Xintian Sewage Treatment Plant, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China. After sample collection, samples were conditioned with K2FeO4 for 24 h. The conditioning ratio was 177.32 g of K2FeO4 per kg of dry sludge. The conditioned sludge was dewatered with vacuum filtration to obtain a K2FeO4 sludge cake, and a raw sludge cake was obtained by dewatering the untreated sludge. The two kinds of cake were dried at 105 ± 5 °C in constant-temperature drying drum bellows to obtain the dry sludge samples, which were ground to particles of less than 0.15 mm in size. Finally, the samples were placed in sealed bags for storage until subsequent experiments could be conducted.

2.2. Preparation of Sludge Biochar

The sludge samples were placed in a closed tubular electric furnace, and 100 mL/min of nitrogen (N2) was injected into the furnace for 10 min before heating. Then, the tubular electric furnace was heated from room temperature to 800 °C for 30 min at a heating rate of 15 °C/min. Immediately after the completion of pyrolysis, the samples were cooled to room temperature in a dryer for subsequent experiments.

2.3. Physical and Chemical Properties

The sludge samples were analyzed according to the industrial analysis method for solid biomass fuel (GB/T 28731-2012). A Vario EL cube CHNS elemental analyzer (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany) was used to determine the C, H, N, and S contents of the samples. The chlorine content in the samples was determined using the determination method for chlorine in solid biomass fuel (GB/T 30729-2014).

2.4. TG-MS and Py-GC/MS Analysis

TG-MS (Thermo plus EV2/Thermo Mass Photo, Japan) was used to determine the weight loss curves and N/S/Cl contaminant release characteristics of the sludge samples. Approximately 10 mg of sludge sample was placed in a platinum crucible in a thermogravimetric (TG) furnace and then heated from room temperature to 800 °C at a rate of 15 °C/min under N2-release conditions of 300 mL/min.
Py-GC/MS experiments were carried out using a thermal cracker (EGA/PY-3030D, Japan) combined with GC/MS (CMS-QP2010 SE, Shimadzu, Japan). The pyrolyzer was preheated to 800 °C, and the sample was put inside and pyrolyzed for 24 s in a helium atmosphere. The volatiles from the pyrolysis were collected and separated with gas chromatography (7890B, agilent, American) and identified with mass spectrometry (MS). The column temperature program consisted of room temperature to 50 °C over 1 min, 50 °C to 80 °C at 5 °C/min, and finally 80 °C to 300 °C at 15 °C/min. Subsequently, the temperature was maintained at 300 °C for 20 min. The chromatographic peaks were identified according to the NIST database, and the compounds that appeared in more than 70% of samples were classified. The compounds obtained were divided into six classes: aliphatic hydrocarbons, oxygen-containing compounds, nitrogen-containing compounds, chlorine compounds, and sulfur compounds. Compounds in which the number of carbon atoms less than or equal to 7 were classified into group C7≤, while compounds in which the number of carbon atoms greater than 7 were classified into group C7>.

2.5. Dynamic Analysis

The specific method of dynamical analysis is shown in File S1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Potassium Ferrate on the Physicochemical Properties of Sludge

Table 1 shows the industrial and elementary analyses of the sludge samples. The results of the industrial analysis showed that compared with the original sludge, the sludge conditioned by ferric chloride (FC-SS), and ferric sulfate (FS-SS), respectively [20], the percentage of moisture, volatile content, and fixed carbon in the potassium-permalate-conditioned sludge (PF-SS) decreased, while the percentage of ash increased. This could be attributed to potassium permalate being an inorganic substance that has a cracking effect on the sludge, causing the organic substances, e.g., protein and polysaccharide, in the sludge to be released from the solid phase into the liquid phase and discharged with the extracted water during the dewatering process. Wu et al. have proposed potassium ferrate to be a strong oxidant with a highly effective sludge-disintegration ability [14]. In addition, the results of elemental analysis showed that compared with that in RSS, FC-SS, and FS-SS, the percentage of C, H, O, and N in PF-SS decreased, while the percentage of Fe increased significantly. This may be because the reduction of Fe6+ in potassium ferrate to Fe3+, which was retained in the negatively charged sludge, reduced the organic components in the dry sludge. In addition, the release of protein and polysaccharide may reduce the content of C, H, O, and N in PF-SS.

3.2. Effect of Potassium Ferrate on the Sludge Thermal Decomposition Characteristics

Figure 1 shows the thermogravimetric (TG) and reciprocal thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of the PF-SS and RSS treatments. The pyrolysis process consisted of three stages. The first stage (room temperature–180 °C) was the drying stage, with RSS and PF-SS weight decreasing by 3.16% and 4%, respectively. The changes in the sludge at this stage were small and mainly originated from the loss of free water and light volatile compounds (e.g., aliphatic and aromatic structures) [21]. The second stage (180–550 °C) was the main stage of sludge pyrolysis mass loss, with a 48.92% and 44.69% weight reduction in RSS and PF-SS, respectively. In this stage, the organic matter in the sludge is gradually carbonized and converted into fixed carbon and noncondensable gases (CO, CO2, etc.), while organic compounds and tar were released [22]. According to the DTG curve, temperatures of 180–380 °C (range Ⅰ) may be related to the decomposition of biodegradable substances. Additionally, there was a shoulder peak at temperatures of 380–550 °C (range Ⅱ), which may be due to the presence of overlapping organic matter in ranges I and II of the pyrolysis process and may involve the decomposition of organic substances (e.g., polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and acids) [23].The peak DTG and total mass loss at this stage was less for PF-SS than for RSS due to the higher organic content in RSS than for PF-SS and the increased iron content in the sludge, which affected the percentage of organic matter content. Further, the DTG of PF-SS peaked at 300 °C, which was lower than that of RSS which peaked at 320 °C. These differences may be due to the catalytic effect of the Fe introduced by the conditioning, which reduced the temperature required for the thermal decomposition of some components of organic matter [24]. The third stage (above 550 °C) was mainly the release of small amounts of thermal decomposition gases, which may be associated with the decomposition of residual carbon and organic and inorganic salts (carbonate, sulfate, and organic salts, including carboxylate) [25]. According to the DTG curve, the PF-SS treatment appeared to increase the decomposition of inorganic salts during the pyrolysis stage. In line with the results of our previous report [20], the thermal decomposition characteristics of PF-SS were similar to those of FC-SS and FS-SS.

3.3. Kinetics Analysis

The kinetic parameters of RSS and PF-SS for two temperature ranges (Range Ⅰ: 180–380 °C and Range Ⅱ: 380–550 °C) of the second stage pyrolysis reaction are listed in Table S1, including the activation energy, finger front factor, and linear regression coefficient (R2). In Range Ⅰ, the activation energy of PF-SS was smaller than that of RSS, and the R2 of the first order (F1) in the chemical reaction order had a better R2 of 0.999. In this stage, the activation energy required to initiate the reaction process for PF-SS was lower because of the high organic matter content of the RSS Itself and the high iron content of the sludge conditioned with potassium permalate. Additionally, the cracking effect of potassium permalate also reduced the organic matter content in the sludge; thus, PF-SS consequently had a lower organic matter content. Meanwhile, in Range Ⅱ, the activation energy of PF-SS was slightly higher than that of RSS, possibly because more chemical energy was required for the subsequent reaction with potassium permalate and because other organic matter components that are difficult to decompose were present. Furthermore, chemical reaction order 2 (F2) was 0.999 for Range II of RSS and PF-SS. F1 and F2 are therefore suitable for the pyrolysis of the sludge samples under study. In summary, PF-SS required less activation energy during pyrolysis, indicating that the addition of iron-containing conditioning agents reduced the activation energy required for sludge pyrolysis, making it easier for the sludge to be pyrolyzed to produce volatiles.

3.4. Pyrolytic Gas Evolution

3.4.1. Release of C/H/O-Containing Substances

Figure 2 shows the release pattern of the main C/H/O gas products (CH4, H2O, CO, C2H6, C3H4, and CO2) released at different temperatures during pyrolysis of the sludge samples, and Table 2 presents the peak integral areas of the C/H/O gas products. As shown in Figure 2a, methane (CH4) shows a clear main peak over the temperature interval of 170–400 °C, which is generated by the release of large-molecule compounds via cleavage into small-molecule compounds, probably due to the promotion of residual iron ions in the sludge [20]. A shoulder peak at the temperature interval of 400–590 °C probably resulted from the cleavage of methoxy clusters [26]. Additionally, the CH4 peak of PF-SS appeared earlier than that of RSS, proving that PF-SS could generate CH4 at a lower pyrolysis temperature. Figure 2b shows the H2O release curve with a peak at a temperature of 100 °C, where the production of H2O gas was mainly caused by the evaporation of adsorbed water on the sample surface. Additionally, significant H2O peaks were also observed when the pyrolysis temperatures were at 285 °C and 485 °C, which may be related to the bonding of -OH, -O, and H2 generated at high temperatures and the decomposition of oxygenated compounds [27]. Notably, the generation of CO mainly depends on the C-O-C or C=O double bond breakage [28]. Figure 2c shows the release curve of the gas CO, which is produced mainly by C-O-C or C=O double bond breakage. When the temperature was lower than 200 ℃, CO release tended to decrease, which may be related to N2 being adsorbed on the sample surface. The curve peaks after 200 °C and tends to increase after 550 °C; the PF-SS clearly tends to rise more than the RSS, and the production of CO at this stage is related to the Boudouard reaction (C + CO2 ↔ 2CO) [29]. The reaction of Fe2O3 (generated at high temperatures with K2FeO4) and CO leads to a shift in the Boudouard reaction towards CO generation, allowing the C present in the sludge to participate in the reaction. Additionally, Fe2O3 can promote C-C bond breakage and increase CO emission, which also confirms that the PF-SS weight loss rate is greater than that of RSS at temperatures above 700 °C (Figure 1) [30]. Figure 2f shows the CO2 release curve, and it is clear from the figure that there is a peak over the temperature interval of 170–550 °C and that the peak of PF-SS is higher than that of RSS. According to the results in Table 2, the peak areas of CH4, H2O, CO, and CO2 generated during PF-SS pyrolysis were larger than those of RSS, which proves that the iron contained in the sludge promotes the generation of permanent gas products containing C/H/O during the pyrolysis process. The results in Figure 2d,e and Table 2 show that C2H6 and C3H4 yields from PF-SS pyrolysis are smaller than those from RSS, which may be due to the low volatile organic matter content and high ash content of PF-SS compared to RSS. According to the results of a previous study [20], both ferric chloride and ferric sulfate promote the production of CH4, CO, C2H6, C3H4, and CO2. In this study, K2FeO4 promoted the production of CH4, CO, and CO2, and the CH4 and CO produced by PF-SS were lower than those of FC-SS, which may be due to the low content of C, H, and O in PF-SS (as shown in Table 1).

3.4.2. N-Containing Pollutants

Figure 3 shows the release patterns of the main N-containing pollutant gas products (NH3, HCN, C2H3N, HNCO, C2H7N, NO2, C3HN, C3H3N, C4H5N, and C5H5N) released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples at different temperatures. Table 3 lists the peak integrated areas of the gaseous products containing N pollutants. The results show that in sludge pyrolysis, the main N-containing gaseous products that are converted to N species in sludge are HCN, NH3, C2H3N, and HNCO. Further, the amount of N-containing contaminants released from the PF-SS treatment was less than that released from the RSS treatment, except for C5H5N. HCN release showed a wide temperature range, with two peaks in PF-SS and three peaks in RSS, indicating the existence of different HCN formation pathways [31]. The peaks in the range 300–550 °C can be explained by the formation of functional -CN groups attached to hydrogen radicals as a result of the dehydrogenation cleavage of some N-amines and the cleavage of the nitrogen heterocycle contained in some residue samples. At temperatures greater than 550 °C, the release of HCN may be due to the conversion of some amines to nitrile, which generates a large amount of HCN and subsequently lowers NH3 production [32]. The NH3 gas release also showed a relatively wide temperature range, and both the PF-SS and RSS showed three peaks. For PF-SS, except for the first peak, the other two peaks were lower in height than that of RSS. The first peak below 200 °C represents mainly the conversion of inorganic ammonium salts and unstable proteins. The second peak between 200 °C and 400 °C represents mainly the hydrogenation of amino-N compounds from the thermal decomposition of proteins to form NH3. Lastly, the third peak was around 500 °C, which may be the reason for the formation of NH3 through tar N cleavage in combination with hydrogen radicals [33]. The release curve of acetonitrile (C2H3N) was similar to that of HCN, showing a weak shoulder peak near 360 °C. They may have similar formation pathways, such as dehydrogenation, and undergo azaheterocyclic cleavage. In addition, the -CN functional group had halogen-like properties, which can lead to the bonding with hydrocarbon groups and alkane substitution reactions. HNCO was mainly produced in the 200–520 °C interval, with two distinct spikes at 270 °C and 480 °C demonstrating two different formation pathways. In conclusion, PF-SS released fewer nitrogenous contaminants than did RSS during pyrolysis, which may be partly due to the iron compounds in PF-SS immobilizing N into the char as more stable nitrogen species (pyridine-N and pyrrole-N) [34]. However, the cracking effect of potassium permeate on the sludge leads to the N-containing organic matter, such as proteins, being released from the sludge into the liquid phase and discharged during the conditioning phase [20]. Some studies have shown that after the sludge is conditioned with potassium pertechnetate, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and cellular material are released into the aqueous phase, consisting primarily of polysaccharides and proteins [35].Compared to the results of our previous studies on the effect of iron-containing conditioner on sludge pyrolysis gas [20], the amount of all the N-containing pollutant gas products produced by PF-SS was lower than that produced by FC-SS and FS-SS. This may be due to the low content of the N element in PF-SS (as shown in Table 1).

3.4.3. S-Containing Pollutants

Figure 4 shows the release pattern of the primary S-containing pollutant gas products (H2S, CH3SH, COS, SO2, CS2, C2H6OS, and C2H6O2S) as a function of temperature, obtained from different sludge samples. Table 4 lists the peak integral areas of the S gas-containing products. The results showed that the PF-SS treatment significantly reduced the release of H2S, CH3SH, COS, and SO2 compared with the RSS treatment. Pyrolysis caused release of large amounts of hydrogen-containing radicals, such as CH3 and H, which combine with S-containing radicals and are released as CH3SH and H2S, respectively [36]. Figure 4a represents the release curve of H2S. Two peaks were evident from the graph: the first spike occurred at 300 °C, and the main source of release at this stage was the cleavage of aliphatic-S; the second spike was observed at 480 °C, and the release at this stage was mainly attributed to the cleavage of aromatic-S. Further, a micropeak was also present at 700 °C, which was likely related to the thermal decomposition of stable thiophene-S species in tar and charcoal [37]. In addition, a slight shoulder peak in H2S occurred at temperatures exceeding 600 °C, which may be related to the thermal decomposition of stable thiophene-S species in tar and char [38]. Figure 4b shows that the release of CH3SH is similar to that of H2S, with two main peaks occurring at 340 °C and 450 °C, respectively. The main source is the decomposition of some organic sulfides including thiols, polysulfides, disulfides, dialkyl sulfides, and alkyl-aryl sulfides in the sample. The release of COS may be related to the combination of C=O radicals with S radicals as well as the reaction of CO2 and H2S under high-temperature conditions as represented in the following equation: C O 2 + H 2 S C O + H 2 O . However, as the temperature increased, a large amount of H2 was produced, and H2 and COS reacted ( H 2 + C O S C O + H 2 S ), which led to a reduction in COS content. The increase in iron promotes the activation of hydrogen atoms, and this also explains the apparently lower release of gas from PF-SS compared to RSS, as shown in Figure 4c [39]. Figure 4d shows that SO2 production is mainly due to oxidation by oxygen-containing reactive radicals, such as S H + · O H S O 2 + H 2 [40]. In summary, the sludge conditioned with potassium permalate released significantly fewer S-containing contaminants than did the original sludge, and this was likely because of the inhibited formation of sulfate by elemental iron which also promoted the activation of hydrogen atoms, thereby facilitating the hydrogenation saturation of sulfur compounds and the cleavage of aromatic rings. Compared to the results of our previous studies on the effect of iron-containing conditioner on sludge pyrolysis gas [20], the amount of all the S-containing pollutant gas products produced by PF-SS was lower than that produced by FC-SS and FS-SS. This may be due to the low content of the S element in PF-SS (as shown in Table 1). In addition, the iron (elements) content in PF-SS was significantly higher than that in RSS, FC-SS, and FS-SS. Iron ions have a catalytic oxidation effect on H2S and SO2, converting H2S to S and SO2 to SO42− and thus further reducing the content of H2S and SO2 produced by PF-SS [41].

3.4.4. Cl-Containing Pollutants

Figure 5 shows the release patterns of the main Cl-containing pollutant gas products (HCl, Cl2, and chlorinated organic pollutants) released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples at different temperatures. Table 5 lists the peak integrated areas of the Cl-containing gaseous products. The results indicated that except for Cl2, the release of Cl-containing contaminants from PF-SS was lower than that from RSS. RSS and PF-SS produce chlorinated compounds mainly through the cleavage of chlorine-containing organics, as shown in Equations (S4)–(S6). The possible source of HCl was its formation from certain chlorides present in the sludge during pyrolysis. This is shown in Equation (S7), where M represents the different metal elements present in the sludge in the form of metal ions. In addition, the reaction of inorganic chlorides in the sludge with SiO2 could also produce HCl and Cl2 as shown in Equations (S8) and (S9). Cl2 reacts with the NO, produced during pyrolysis, to produce NOCl, as shown in Equation (S10). Compared to the results of the previous study [20], the amount of all of the Cl-containing pollutant gas products produced by PF-SS was lower than that produced by FC-SS but higher than that produced by FS-SS. This may be due to the contents of Cl element being as follows: FS-SS < PF-SS < FC-SS (as shown in Table 1).
Equations (S4)–(S10) are shown in the File S2.

3.5. Pyrolytic Volatiles Products

Figure 6 lists the classification and percentage peak areas for the pyrolysis chromatogram identification of PF-SS versus RSS. Noticeably, the area of the aliphatic hydrocarbon peak from the PF-SS pyrolysis (26.73%) was greater than that of RSS pyrolysis (21.87%). The peak area of the benzene derivative of PF-SS (26.32%) was lower than that of RSS (26.11%). The generation of benzene and derivatives is primarily caused by the decomposition of lignin and partly by the aromatization of cellulose [42]. Additionally, the catalytic reformation and decomposition of benzene derivatives may be due to the iron element of PF-SS [43]. The PF-SS has a lower peak area for oxygen compounds than does RSS. In addition, the peak area of the C7> group released by PF-SS pyrolysis was lower than that of the RSS pyrolysis, while the peak area of the C7≤ group was higher than that of RSS. Compared to the results of the previous study [20], the peak area of the C7≤ group produced by PF-SS was larger than that of FC-SS, while the peak area of the C7> group produced by PF-SS was smaller than that of FC-SS. This may be because iron ions have a catalytic effect, and the content of iron in PF-SS is higher than that in FC-SS. Thus, the iron ions catalyzed the cleavage of the C7> group into the C7≤ group [44]. The identified fraction group of compounds produced during the pyrolysis of PF-SS was higher. These observations demonstrate that Fe promotes the cleavage of macromolecular compounds and the conversion to light tar and syngas, reducing the complexity of the compounds produced by pyrolysis [45]. Based on the percentage peak areas of chlorinated and S-containing compounds in the sludge, potassium permalate conditioning likely reduces the number of chlorinated compounds in the tar, while having no significant effect on the formation of S-containing compounds in the tar phase. Reduction in chlorinated compounds in the tar likely led to the increase in the release of Cl2.

4. Conclusions

In this study, sludge was conditioned with K2FeO4, dewatered, and dried. The effects of K2FeO4 as a sludge-dewatering conditioning agent on the pyrolysis characteristics of sludge and the release characteristics of N-, S-, and Cl-containing contaminants during pyrolysis were investigated using TG-MS and Py-GC/MS. The following conclusions were obtained:
(1)
The pyrolysis of sludge samples was divided into three stages (room temperature–180 °C, 180–550 °C, and above 550 °C). The largest weight loss occurred in the 180–550 °C interval, which primarily involved the pyrolysis of organic matter and fixed carbon, with less residual mass in the PF-SS than the RSS conditions. The dewatering pretreatment with K2FeO4 had a facilitatory effect on sludge pyrolysis.
(2)
Sludge conditioned with K2FeO4 requires less energy for the pyrolysis process. This step also reduces the activation energy, and the type and complexity of volatiles in sludge pyrolysis, making the sludge more susceptible to the reaction.
(3)
Compared with RSS, PF-SS promoted the release of C/H/O gases but inhibited that of N/S/Cl-contaminated gases.
(4)
PF-SS increased the calorific value of tar and improved the chemical stability of bio-oil. The addition of iron promotes the cracking of macromolecular compounds into light tar and syngas as well as the formation of aliphatic hydrocarbons and the catalytic reformation and decomposition of benzene. Moreover, the PF-SS treatment moderately reduces the formation of compounds containing nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine. Compared to the results of the previous study, the amount of CH4 and CO as well as that of the N-containing and S-containing pollutant gas products produced by PF-SS was lower than that produced by FC-SS, which may be due to the low content of C, H, O, N, and S in PF-SS. The amount of all the Cl-containing pollutant gas products produced by PF-SS was lower than that produced by FC-SS, but higher than that of FS-SS.
In this study, the effect of potassium ferrate as a sludge-disintegration conditioner on sludge pyrolysis was analyzed in detail, with particular focus given to the release of polluting elements, including N/S/Cl, to provide a theoretical basis for the environmental pollution problems that may arise during the sludge pyrolysis after potassium ferrate conditioning. However, potassium ferrate is only one of the common sludge-disintegration conditioners, and the effects of other common sludge-disintegration conditioners such as potassium permanganate and persulfate on sludge pyrolysis were not investigated in this study; therefore, further comparative analysis of the effects of sludge-disintegration conditioners on sludge pyrolysis is needed in subsequent studies, which may provide a firmer theoretical basis for the selection of conditioners in the sludge conditioning–dewatering–pyrolysis system process.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr11030920/s1, Table S1. Kinetic parameters of sludge samples.

Author Contributions

H.Z.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, and writing—original draft. W.T.: data curation and conceptualization. M.H.: formal analysis. M.R.: methodology. C.C.: data curation. J.L.: methodology. L.T.: data curation. L.H.: supervision. P.D.: project administration and writing—review and editing. D.C.: data curation. Y.W.: supervision, project administration, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51808089); the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Wan Zhou, China (grant number wzstc20210308); and the Industry-University-Research Cooperation Project (Chongqing Three Gorges University and Chongqing Green Karbon Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51808089); the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Wan Zhou, China (grant number wzstc20210308); and the Industry-University-Research Cooperation Project (Chongqing Three Gorges University and Chongqing Green Karbon Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Nieto, A.; Mendez, A.; Askeland, M.P.J.; Gasco, G. Biochar from Biosolids Pyrolysis: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zielińska, A.; Oleszczuk, P. The conversion of sewage sludge into biochar reduces polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content and ecotoxicity but increases trace metal content. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 75, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.; Chang, V.W.-C.; Li, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and organic fractions of municipal solid waste: Synergistic effects on biochar properties and the environmental risk of heavy metals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Deng, P.Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, M.Q.; Lan, G.X.; Zhong, Y.H.; Wu, Y.; Fu, C.A.; Shi, H.Y.; Zhu, R.; Zhou, L.L. Effect of dewatering conditioners on phosphorus removal efficiency of sludge biochar. Environ. Technol. 2022, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pan, X.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Xia, Y.; Liu, C.; Wu, Y.; Fu, C.; Hu, K.; Su, K.; Zhang, Z. Comparative study on the effect of different dewatering skeleton conditioners on sludge pyrolysis products. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bao, D.; Li, Z.; Tang, R.; Wan, C.; Zhang, C.; Tan, X.; Liu, X. Metal-modified sludge-based biochar enhance catalytic capacity: Characteristics and mechanism. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 284, 112113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, C.; Wu, Y.; Lan, G.; Ji, X.; Xia, Y.; Fu, C.; Shen, J.; Gui, J.; Liu, Y.; Qu, Y.; et al. CO2 capture performance of biochar prepared from sewage sludge after conditioning with different dewatering agents. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Yang, W.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Xing, D.; Dong, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, J. The combination of aerobic digestion and bioleaching for heavy metal removal from excess sludge. Chemosphere 2022, 290, 133231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, L.-B.; Yuan, X.-Z.; Li, H.; Chen, X.-H.; Xiao, Z.-H.; Liang, J.; Leng, L.-J.; Guo, Z.; Zeng, G.-M. Co-pelletization of sewage sludge and biomass: Thermogravimetric analysis and ash deposits. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 145, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, K.; Themelis, N.J.; Bourtsalas, A.C.; Huang, Q. Selective production of aromatics from waste plastic pyrolysis by using sewage sludge derived char catalyst. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bridgwater, A.V. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 38, 68–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, H.; Cheng, F.; Yu, B.; Hu, L.; Zhang, J.; Qu, X.; Yang, H.; Luo, Z. Full-scale municipal sludge pyrolysis in China: Design fundamentals, environmental and economic assessments, and future perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zheng, D.; Tang, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, R. Research and application of polyethylene glycol solution dialysis combined with vacuum pressure in sludge dewatering. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, C.; Jin, L.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, G. Effects of potassium ferrate oxidation on sludge disintegration, dewaterability and anaerobic biodegradation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 102, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, A.; Mao, S.; Jenkinson, I.R.; Tao, W. Using a strong chemical oxidant, potassium ferrate (K2FeO4), in waste activated sludge treatment: A review. Environ. Res. 2020, 188, 109764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, W.; Cao, B.; Wang, D.; Ma, T.; Yu, D. Variations in distribution and composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of biological sludge under potassium ferrate conditioning: Effects of pH and ferrate dosage. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 106, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. He, Z.-W.; Liu, W.-Z.; Gao, Q.; Tang, C.-C.; Wang, L.; Guo, Z.-C.; Zhou, A.-J.; Wang, A.-J. Potassium ferrate addition as an alternative pre-treatment to enhance short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, A.; Wu, Y.; Wang, M.; Lan, G.; Xia, Y.; Liu, C.; Ji, X.; Shen, J.; Li, T.; Fu, C.; et al. Effect of FeCl3 combined with biochar as dewatering conditioners on sludge pyrolysis products. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 186, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, S.; Cheng, S.; Xiao, X.; Lai, F. Impact of persulphate mixed with paper sludge on activated sludge dewaterability. Water Environ. 2020, 34, 884–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, M.; Pan, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhu, A.; Wu, Y.; Fu, C.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, J.; Li, J.; Fu, J. Effect of dewatering conditioners on pollutants with nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine releasing characteristics during sewage sludge pyrolysis. Fuel 2022, 307, 121834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, Y.; Liao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Fang, S.; Ma, X. A study on co-pyrolysis of bagasse and sewage sludge using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 151, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Naqvi, S.R.; Tariq, R.; Hameed, Z.; Ali, I.; Naqvi, M.; Chen, W.-H.; Ceylan, S.; Rashid, H.; Ahmad, J.; Taqvi, S.A.; et al. Pyrolysis of high ash sewage sludge: Kinetics and thermodynamic analysis using Coats-Redfern method. Renew. Energy 2019, 131, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, N.; Li, J.; Qi, B.; Li, A.; Duan, Y.; Wang, Z. Thermal analysis and products distribution of dried sewage sludge pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 105, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, J.; Xu, X.; Liang, S.; Guan, R.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Song, J.; Yu, W.; Xiao, K.; et al. Enhanced hydrogen production in catalytic pyrolysis of sewage sludge by red mud: Thermogravimetric kinetic analysis and pyrolysis characteristics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 7795–7807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Karayigit, A.I.; Oskay, R.G.; Çelik, Y. Mineralogy, petrography, and Rock-Eval pyrolysis of late Oligocene coal seams in the Malkara coal field from the Thrace Basin (NW Turkey). Int. J. Coal Geol. 2021, 244, 103814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Xue, Y.; Liu, J.; Mei, M.; Hou, H.; Chen, S. Co-pyrolysis behavior of sewage sludge and rice husk by TG-MS and residue analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, C.; Bi, H.; Lin, Q.; Jiang, X.; Jiang, C. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk by TG–FTIR–MS: Pyrolysis behavior, kinetics, and condensable/non-condensable gases characteristics. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1048–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zou, C.; Ma, C.; Zhao, J.; Shi, R.; Li, X. Characterization and non-isothermal kinetics of Shenmu bituminous coal devolatilization by TG-MS. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 127, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zi-Zhao, D.; Zhang, S.; Qiang, L.; Ming-Hui, D.; Rui, G.; Jie-Ping, W.; Guang-Yue, L.; Ying-Hua, L. Boudouard reaction accompanied by graphitization of wrinkled carbon layers in coke gasification: A theoretical insight into the classical understanding. Fuel 2021, 297, 120747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Deng, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Dai, J.; Song, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Qu, J.; et al. Co-pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and red wood waste in a continuously operated auger reactor under microwave irradiation. Energy 2021, 218, 119398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, K.; Guan, R.; Yang, J.; Li, H.; Yu, Z.; Liang, S.; Yu, W.; Hu, J.; Hou, H.; Liu, B. Effects of red mud on emission control of NOx precursors during sludge pyrolysis: A protein model compound study. Waste Manag. 2019, 85, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meng, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Cheng, F. Study on the multiple roles of CaO on nitrogen evolution mechanism of protein inside sewage sludge pyrolysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 458, 141039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, H.; Li, A.; Zhu, M.; Hu, S.; Xu, J.; Xiong, Z.; Ren, Q.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Su, S.; et al. Heavy tar evolution characteristics during advanced sludge pyrolysis and biomass gasification integrated process. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 853, 158107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xiao, K.; Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Yang, J.; Liang, S.; Hu, J.; Hou, H.; Liu, B. Investigation on emission control of NOx precursors and phosphorus reclamation during pyrolysis of ferric sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, Z.-W.; Tang, C.-C.; Liu, W.-Z.; Ren, Y.-X.; Guo, Z.-C.; Zhou, A.-J.; Wang, L.; Yang, C.-X.; Wang, A.-J. Enhanced short-chain fatty acids production from waste activated sludge with alkaline followed by potassium ferrate treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, G.; Li, J.; Li, K.; Lin, F.; Tian, W.; Che, L.; Yan, B.; Ma, W.; Song, Y. Nitrogen, sulfur, chlorine containing pollutants releasing characteristics during pyrolysis and combustion of oily sludge. Fuel 2020, 273, 117772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, W.-J.; Shao, Z.-G.; Xu, Y. Emission characteristics of nitrogen and sulfur containing pollutants during the pyrolysis of oily sludge with and without catalysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nsaful, F.; Collard, F.-X.; Görgens, J.F. Lignocellulose thermal pretreatment and its effect on fuel properties and composition of the condensable products (tar precursors) from char devolatilization for coal substitution in gasification application. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 179, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, S.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, Z. Effect of inherent minerals on sewage sludge pyrolysis: Product characteristics, kinetics and thermodynamics. Waste Manag. 2018, 80, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ibrahim, S.; Rahman, R.K.; Raj, A. Effects of H2O in the Feed of Sulfur Recovery Unit on Sulfur Production and Aromatics Emission from Claus Furnace. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 11713–11725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, H.; Zhang, H.; Han, D. Ferrocene addition for suppression of hydrogen sulfide formation during thermal recovery of oil sand bitumen. Energy 2021, 230, 120744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, B.; Dichiara, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J. Tar formation and evolution during biomass gasification: An experimental and theoretical study. Fuel 2018, 234, 944–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Paul, K.; Jalal, S.; Kundal, S.; Jana, U. Synthesis of Fused Dibenzofuran Derivatives via Palladium-Catalyzed Domino C–C Bond Formation and Iron-Catalyzed Cycloisomerization/Aromatization. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 1164–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, G.; Chen, D.; Arena, U.; Huang, Z.; Dai, X. Reforming sewage sludge pyrolysis volatile with Fe-embedded char: Minimization of liquid product yield. Waste Manag. 2018, 73, 464–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhao, H.; Li, Y.; Song, Q.; Liu, S.; Ma, L.; Shu, X. Catalytic reforming of volatiles from co-pyrolysis of lignite blended with corn straw over three iron ores: Effect of iron ore types on the product distribution, carbon-deposited iron ore reactivity and its mechanism. Fuel 2021, 286, 119398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric (TG) and reciprocal thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of sludge.
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric (TG) and reciprocal thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of sludge.
Processes 11 00920 g001
Figure 2. Main C/H/O-containing gas products released during the pyrolysis of sludge samples. (a) CH4 (b) H2O (c) CO (d) C2H6 (e) C3H4 (f) CO2.
Figure 2. Main C/H/O-containing gas products released during the pyrolysis of sludge samples. (a) CH4 (b) H2O (c) CO (d) C2H6 (e) C3H4 (f) CO2.
Processes 11 00920 g002aProcesses 11 00920 g002b
Figure 3. Main N-containing pollutant gas products released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples. (a) NH3 (b) HCN (c) C2H3N (d) HNCO (e) C2H7N (f) NO2 (g) C3HN (h) C3H3N (i) C4H5N (j) C5H5N.
Figure 3. Main N-containing pollutant gas products released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples. (a) NH3 (b) HCN (c) C2H3N (d) HNCO (e) C2H7N (f) NO2 (g) C3HN (h) C3H3N (i) C4H5N (j) C5H5N.
Processes 11 00920 g003aProcesses 11 00920 g003b
Figure 4. Main S-containing pollutant gas products released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples. (a) H2S (b) CH3SH (c) COS (d) SO2 (e) CS2 (f) C2H6OS (g) C2H6O2S.
Figure 4. Main S-containing pollutant gas products released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples. (a) H2S (b) CH3SH (c) COS (d) SO2 (e) CS2 (f) C2H6OS (g) C2H6O2S.
Processes 11 00920 g004aProcesses 11 00920 g004b
Figure 5. Main Cl-containing pollutant gas products released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples. (a) HCl (b) CH3Cl (c) C2H3Cl (d) NOCl (e) Cl2 (f) C3H5Cl (g) C6H5Cl.
Figure 5. Main Cl-containing pollutant gas products released during the pyrolysis of different sludge samples. (a) HCl (b) CH3Cl (c) C2H3Cl (d) NOCl (e) Cl2 (f) C3H5Cl (g) C6H5Cl.
Processes 11 00920 g005
Figure 6. Classification and percentage peak areas for the identification of PF-SS and RSS according to the pyrolysis chromatogram.
Figure 6. Classification and percentage peak areas for the identification of PF-SS and RSS according to the pyrolysis chromatogram.
Processes 11 00920 g006
Table 1. Proximate and ultimate analyses of the sludge samples.
Table 1. Proximate and ultimate analyses of the sludge samples.
SampleProximate Analysis (wt %)Ultimate Analysis (wt %)
MadAadVadFCadCHO 1NSClFe
RSS 21.8831.0060.636.4934.475.2521.486.680.9130.212.23
PF–SS1.0439.4555.244.2730.464.7018.715.460.940.289.59
1 O (wt %) = 100 − (C + H + N + S + Cl + Aad). 2 The data are from our previously published paper [20].
Table 2. MS peak areas of the main C/H/O-containing permanent gases during the pyrolysis of the sludge samples.
Table 2. MS peak areas of the main C/H/O-containing permanent gases during the pyrolysis of the sludge samples.
CompoundMoleculem/zRSS 1PF-SS
MethaneCH4169.09 × 10−71.14 × 10−6
WaterH2O181.02 × 10−51.08 × 10−5
Carbon monoxideCO282.30 × 10−62.71 × 10−6
EthaneC2H6301.83 × 10−71.70 × 10−7
PropyneC3H4401.36 × 10−71.05 × 10−7
Carbon dioxideCO2444.00 × 10−64.84 × 10−6
1 The data are from our previously published paper [20].
Table 3. Peak integrated areas of gas products containing N pollutants.
Table 3. Peak integrated areas of gas products containing N pollutants.
CompoundMoleculem/zRSS 1PF-SS
AmmoniaNH3172.72 × 10−62.49 × 10−6
Hydrogen cyanideHCN279.04 × 10−76.98 × 10−7
AcetonitrileC2H3N415.23 × 10−74.52 × 10−7
Isocyanic acidHNCO435.49 × 10−74.75 × 10−7
EthylamineC2H7N451.38 × 10−78.78 × 10−8
Nitrogen dioxideNO2464.93 × 10−84.27 × 10−8
CyanoacetyleneC3HN516.55 × 10−84.58 × 10−8
AcrylonitrileC3H3N537.37 × 10−84.59 × 10−8
PyrroleC4H5N674.47 × 10−83.99 × 10−8
PyridineC5H5N792.29 × 10−82.44 × 10−8
1 The data are from our previously published paper [20].
Table 4. Peak integrated areas of products of gases containing S pollutants.
Table 4. Peak integrated areas of products of gases containing S pollutants.
CompoundMoleculem/zRSS 1PF-SS
Hydrogen sulfideH2S345.74 × 10−81.61 × 10−8
Methyl mercaptanCH3SH487.14 × 10−82.57 × 10−8
Carbonyl sulfideCOS603.91 × 10−81.14 × 10−8
Sulfur dioxideSO2647.70 × 10−82.16 × 10−8
Carbon disulfideCS2767.89 × 10−99.35 × 10−9
Dimethyl sulfoxideC2H6OS781.56 × 10−82.59 × 10−8
Dimethyl sulfoneC2H6O2S941.98 × 10−81.53 × 10−8
1 The data are from our previously published paper [20].
Table 5. Peak integrated areas of gaseous products containing Cl contaminants.
Table 5. Peak integrated areas of gaseous products containing Cl contaminants.
CompoundMoleculem/zRSS 1PF-SS
Hydrogen chlorideHCl374.32 × 10−82.79 × 10−8
Methyl chlorideCH3Cl505.49 × 10−84.26 × 10−8
Vinyl chlorideC2H3Cl621.02 × 10−88.49 × 10−9
Nitrosyl chlorideNOCl653.10 × 10−83.02 × 10−8
ChlorineCl2711.63 × 10−82.05 × 10−8
Allyl chlorideC3H5Cl772.74 × 10−82.23 × 10−8
ChlorobenzeneC6H5Cl1136.18 × 10−91.48 × 10−9
1 The data are from our previously published paper [20].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Tao, W.; Hou, M.; Ran, M.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Tu, L.; Huang, L.; Deng, P.; Chen, D.; et al. Effect of Potassium Ferrate as a Dewatering Conditioner on Sludge Pyrolysis Characteristics and the Releasing Characteristics of Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Chlorine during Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. Processes 2023, 11, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030920

AMA Style

Zhang H, Tao W, Hou M, Ran M, Chen C, Liu J, Tu L, Huang L, Deng P, Chen D, et al. Effect of Potassium Ferrate as a Dewatering Conditioner on Sludge Pyrolysis Characteristics and the Releasing Characteristics of Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Chlorine during Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis. Processes. 2023; 11(3):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hua, Wenpan Tao, Mingming Hou, Maoqian Ran, Chi Chen, Jingcui Liu, Liang Tu, Lan Huang, Peiyao Deng, Dan Chen, and et al. 2023. "Effect of Potassium Ferrate as a Dewatering Conditioner on Sludge Pyrolysis Characteristics and the Releasing Characteristics of Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Chlorine during Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis" Processes 11, no. 3: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop