You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .

Review Reports

Processes2022, 10(7), 1264;https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071264

Koki Hara^1,2,
Shunji Yamada² and
Eisuke Chikayama^2,3
et al.

Reviewer 1: Gloria Uccello Barretta Reviewer 2: Joanna Brys

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised manuscript has been improved and it can be published without further modifications.

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank you for taking into account my suggestions and for answering my questions. I have no more questions.The Figures help a lot in understanding the content. In my opinion the manuscript is suitable for publication as it is.