Next Article in Journal
Material Removal Optimization Strategy of 3D Block Cutting Based on Geometric Computation Method
Previous Article in Journal
Valuation of Climate Performance of a Low-Tech Greenhouse in Costa Rica
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Biodegradation Kinetics of Phenol and 4-Chlorophenol in the Presence of Sodium Salicylate in Batch and Chemostat Systems

Processes 2022, 10(4), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10040694
by Yen-Hui Lin * and Bing-Han Ho
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2022, 10(4), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10040694
Submission received: 16 March 2022 / Revised: 30 March 2022 / Accepted: 31 March 2022 / Published: 2 April 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript has been written well and supported with sufficient experimental data. The study has investigated the biodegradation of phenol, sodium salicylate and 4-chlorophenol by Pseudomonas putida by batch and chemostat experiments. Please consider the following comments to improve the manuscript.

* The significance of the study should be mentioned clearly in abstract section. The abstract should briefly state the research objectives, main results and main conclusions.

*Provide significant words which are more relevant to the work in logical sequence as ‘keywords’. Also use keywords which are not present in the title.

* The introduction does not provide sufficient background and does not include all relevant references. It needs the addition of some recent new research progress in this field. Please also highlight the novelty of this study in Introduction.

* In materials and method section, any background information, why authors choosed

 Pseudomonas putida species?

* Need to add references for Analystical Methods section.

*Improve the discussion part by adding more supporting data from the literature.

* Authors are suggested to add discussion by explaining trends in the obtained results along with the possible mechanisms behind the trends.

* It is strongly recommended to add a subsection, 'practical implications of this study,' outlining the challenges in the current research, future work, and recommendations, before the conclusion.

* Pls. conclude with more focus on the major outcomes of the paper.

* Check and correct grammatical and space errors throughout the article.

Author Response

Please see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all of my queries, therefore the manuscript may be accepted in the present form 

Reviewer 2 Report

Thanks for providing all answers line by line. I think now your paper is ready for publication in processes.

Back to TopTop