Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Four Density-Based Semi-Empirical Models for the Solubility of Azo Disperse Dyes in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Thermal Plasma as a Biomass Pretreatment in Biorefining Processes
Previous Article in Journal
A Mechanism Assessment and Differences of Cadmium Adsorption on Raw and Alkali-Modified Agricultural Waste
Previous Article in Special Issue
Upgrading Waste Activated Carbon by Equipping Micro-/Mesopore-Dominant Microstructures from the Perspective of Circular Economy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/pr10101959
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in the Bioconversion of Waste Straw Biomass with Steam Explosion Technique: A Comprehensive Review

by
Baige Zhang
1,
Hongzhao Li
1,2,
Limei Chen
3,
Tianhong Fu
1,4,5,
Bingbing Tang
6,
Yongzhou Hao
1,2,
Jing Li
1,
Zheng Li
1,
Bangxi Zhang
5,
Qing Chen
6,
Chengrong Nie
2,
Zi-Yi You
7,
Chung-Yu Guan
7,* and
Yutao Peng
8,*
1
Key Laboratory for New Technology Research of Vegetable, Vegetable Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China
2
School of Food Science and Technology, Foshan University, Foshan 528231, China
3
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
4
School of Pharmacy, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563006, China
5
Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China
6
Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
7
Department of Environmental Engineering, National Ilan University, Yilan 260, Taiwan
8
School of Agriculture, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(10), 1959; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101959
Submission received: 20 August 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Conversion and Biorefinery Processes of Waste and Biomass Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Waste straw biomass is an abundant renewable bioresource raw material on Earth. Its stubborn wooden cellulose structure limits straw lignocellulose bioconversion into value-added products (e.g., biofuel, chemicals, and agricultural products). Compared to physicochemical and other preprocessing techniques, the steam explosion method, as a kind of hydrothermal method, was considered as a practical, eco-friendly, and cost-effective method to overcome the above-mentioned barriers during straw lignocellulose bioconversion. Steam explosion pretreatment of straw lignocellulose can effectively improve the conversion efficiency of producing biofuels and value-added chemicals and is expected to replace fossil fuels and partially replace traditional chemical fertilizers. Although the principles of steam explosion destruction of lignocellulosic structures for bioconversion to liquid fuels and producing solid biofuel were well known, applications of steam explosion in productions of value-added chemicals, organic fertilizers, biogas, etc. were less identified. Therefore, this review provides insights into advanced methods of utilizing steam explosion for straw biomass conversion as well as their corresponding processes and mechanisms. Finally, the current limitations and prospects of straw biomass conversion with steam explosion technology were elucidated.

1. Introduction

The development of the global economy has brought about a huge demand for energy, but currently more than 80% of the energy is provided by fossil fuels [1]. The depletion of fossil fuels and the greenhouse effect associated with greenhouse gas emissions have raised serious concerns in the global community [2]. As the fourth largest energy source in the world, bioenergy is playing an increasingly important role in the emerging renewable energy sources in the world [3]. Straw waste is an important by-product in agricultural production. As crop yields increase, so do agricultural straw yields [4]. However, after crops are harvested, most straw waste is discarded or burned [5]. This results in the waste of resources and environmental pollution, such as emissions of greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4) and atmospheric pollutants (particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, etc.) [6,7]. The utilization of waste straw can not only reduce pollution, but also ease the energy crisis [8].
Straw biomass is primarily composed of cellulose (40–50%), hemicellulose (20–40%), and lignin (Figure 1) [9]. Among them, cellulose is the skeleton of straw biomass, and lignin is the protective layer. They are interconnected by covalent (anisole bonds) and non-covalent bonds (hydrogen bonds) to form a lignin-carbohydrate complex structure [10]. These three components are strongly bound together to form the lignocellulosic matrix [11]. Therefore, the physical and chemical complexity of the components requires effective measures to fully expose the cellulose structure, increase the effective contact of cellulose with reactants, and improve the conversion rate of straw biomass [12]. In recent years, some pretreatment techniques have been developed to destroy lignocellulosic structure, including biological, physical, and chemical methods [10]. However, they all have their own shortcomings. Among them, the biological treatment is time-consuming and the degradation efficiency is low [12]. The physical method has a high energy consumption and a low lignin removal rate [13]. The chemical method has the disadvantages of easy corrosion of equipment and complicated post-processing [14]. Therefore, we urgently need to find an effective, green, and pollution-free straw biomass pretreatment technology.
In 1926, Mason invented and patented the steam explosion (SE) technology, which was applied to the production of artificial fiber boards. SE technology is a physicochemical method that combines steam cracking and explosive decompression to depolymerize lignocellulose [14]. The SE pressure was 7–8 MPa, but the technology was limited due to the high requirements for the instruments and equipment. With the in-depth study of this technology, the steam pressure is reduced and the production process is further optimized [15]. In the SE process, the waste straw is subjected to the action of high-pressure saturated steam, and the structure of straw biomass is destroyed and decomposed by steam heating, with the sudden release of pressure and mechanical shearing [16]. Through SE, biomass is depolymerized and dispersed through physical action, and glycosidic bonds and hydrogen bonds are destroyed [17]. On the other hand, acetic acid from the hydrolysis of acetyl groups in hemicellulose leads to the partial cleavage of other glycosidic bonds and β-aryl ether bonds in lignin [18]. The destruction of lignocellulose structure, the decomposition of partial hemicellulose, and the low environmental impact attribute great potential to SE straw pretreatment technology for waste straw biomass valorization [14].
The method of converting waste straw into various bio-products and energy substances through SE pretreatment has attracted great research interest. It was reported that SE technology improves the physicochemical properties of straw, making it beneficial for practical production (Figure 2) [19,20,21]. For example, SE increases the surface area of biomass by removing hemicellulose and relocating lignin, and promotes the hydrolysis of cell wall polysaccharides, resulting in a glucan conversion rate as high as 89.6% [22]. The fermented ethanol yield can be significantly increased after SE pretreatment [23]. Another study found that after SE pretreatment, the disrupted macromolecular structure can be further degraded during anaerobic digestion [24]. As a universally applicable pretreatment method, SE has become an ideal technology for handling many types of bioenergy conversion processes, which provides a strong support for the development of the bioenergy industry [25]. In addition, straw is not only high in calorific value, but also rich in nutrients (N, P, and K) [26]. Therefore, the method of returning straw to the field can increase the content of soil organic matter and nutrients, improve soil physical and chemical properties, and improve soil fertility [27]. However, returning straw for rapid decomposition is usually difficult, and the accumulation of straw can easily affect the normal development of crops and increase crop diseases and insect pests [28]. After SE treatment, the cellulose of straw was greatly exposed, the surface area increased, and the crystallinity of lignocellulose decreased [29,30,31]. This may facilitate the rapid decomposition of straw, improve the soil and promote the growth of beneficial microorganisms, prevent the overuse of chemical fertilizers, and overcome the challenges faced by traditional methods of returning straw to the field [32].
Although SE technology is considered as an effective strategy for straw biomass conversion pretreatment, the knowledge of SE is less known in the production of value-added chemicals, organic fertilizers, biogas, etc. Herein, the effect of SE treatment on biomass conversion of straw and its mechanism needs to be further understood and clarified. This review firstly summarized the sources and properties of different straw biomass; secondly, it concluded the characteristic changes after SE of straw biomass, and finally, it provided insights into the advanced methods and corresponding processes and mechanisms of straw biomass conversions by SE, while clarifying the current limitations and prospects of SE technology for the conversion of straw biomass.

2. Diverse Straw Biomass Source and Properties

The energy and density of straw biomass (bulk density of about 20–40 kg/m3) is less than that of fossil fuels [33]. Straw is recalcitrant in nature, and its cell wall is resistant to harsh external environments [34]. Among them, cellulose provides mechanical support to the cell wall, and the mechanical strength of cellulose is related to its degree of polymerization and glucose chain length [35]. Hemicellulose is linked to cellulose by hydrogen bonds and covalently linked to lignin [36]. Lignin contains aromatic and amorphous properties, and covalent bonds between lignin and cellulose prevent carbohydrate exposure to enzymatic hydrolysis [36]. Elemental analysis shows that the carbon content of straw is about 40%, the hydrogen content is about 5–6%, the oxygen content is close to carbon, and the nitrogen content is about 0.2–1%. The N content is responsible for the formation of NOx and is the main environmental factor for biomass combustion. Generally speaking, the ash and silica content of rice straw is significantly higher than that of other straws, and the ash content of sugarcane straw and corn stover is lower [34,37].
There are many types of straw, including corn straw, wheat straw, rice straw, sugarcane straw, etc. [37]. Sugarcane is the most widely planted crop in the world. The harvested sugarcane is mainly used to produce sugar. As much as 80% of the world’s sugar is produced from sugarcane [38]. It is estimated that every ton of sugarcane produced will produce 0.17 tons of straw waste (top and leaves). In addition, a large amount of bagasse is produced in the sugar production process [39]. Corn is one of the main food crops in most countries (Figure 3A). Cellulose and hemicellulose from corn stover can be used to produce ethanol and sugar, while residual lignin can be used for soil improvement and combustion as boiler fuel [40]. In addition, hemicellulose is also used to produce xylose and furfural due to the highly branched, amorphous nature of hemicellulose and its easy-to-convert nature [40,41]. According to reports, for every ton of wheat or rice produced, 1.5 tons of straw are produced [38]. As the second largest agricultural waste resource in the world, the bioconversion of wheat straw into biofuels, bioethanol, and bio-methanol has made great achievements in practice [42]. Rice straw is one of the most popular biomasses for bioethanol production, producing approximately 282 billion liters of ethanol per year based on global rice straw production [43] (Figure 3B).

3. Characteristic Changes of Straw Biomass after Explosion Treatment

For the pretreatment of straw SE, the chemical composition of wheat straw was determined according to the methods reported by the Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI) (T 429 cm-01 for cellulose content, T 223 cm-01 for hemi-cellulose content, and T 222 cm-02 for lignin content), and the steam temperature and residence time (the temperature of steam burst technology is usually 160–260 °C, and the pressure is usually 0.69–4.83 MPa [44]) were inversely proportional to the hemicellulose content, while the lignin change was not obvious, and the cellulose content increased [45]. The SE (2.5 MPa/200 s) pretreatment of corn straw can reduce the lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose content by 36.65%, 50.45%, and 8.47%, respectively [46]. During a fiber extraction case, it can be found that treating the straw with a NaOH solution and thermal SE can make the lignin and hemicellulose larger than those left over from the chemical treatment [21]. After SE, the alkalinity of the straw, the ratio of the large particles, and the hydrophobicity of the straw were reduced [47].
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fiber testing, and FTIR results from the SE treated wheat straw found that the SE treated wheat straw microparticles increased, its porosity was enhanced, and the specific surface area was higher [45]. For SE-treated rapeseed straw, its crystallization index was 64.72%, an increase of 7.24% compared with the control [48]. The effect of SE on corn stalks was studied using terahertz time domain spectroscopy and SEM, and it was found that the parenchymal cells and epidermis of the SE-treated corn stems were crushed and separated by SE, and the specific surface area increased significantly, which could accelerate the fermentation speed when producing biogas and biofuels [49]. SE treatment damaged the rice straw structure and a large number of holes appeared, and the permeability coefficient was improved while the calcium oxide treatment did not exhibit a large number of holes [50]. In addition, the SE-treated cellulose has recrystallization and hydrogen bond rearrangement, which indicates that the regularity of the cellulose lattice structure is improved. The SE treatment can make the binding of the eucalyptus fiber become loose, the surface area increase, and the pore membrane rupture. Herein, the cellulose is largely unaffected, with the exception of a small amount of degradation in the amorphous area, which is conducive to improving the enzymatic lysis rate.

4. Straw Valorization with SE Treatment

SE is a technology that uses the principle of a steam catapult to pretreat biomass such as straw. Thermal degradation and hemicellulose autocatalysis occur under high temperature and high humidity conditions, when the straw is heated with steam at a high temperature (180–235 °C) under a high pressure (which is maintained for a while). After the straw is crushed and added to the instrument, the water is heated and pressurized, and once a certain pressure is reached, it is maintained for a while, before the instantaneous steam release is realized to achieve a “flash explosion”. Water vapor can heat the straw to a predetermined temperature in a high-pressure environment and diffuses into the lignocellulose cell wall, turning into liquid water when cold. During steam explosion, the structure will be destroyed, the liquid water will soften the lignin and reduce the strength of the connection between fibers. Additionally, part of the hemicellulose will be hydrolyzed to produce organic acids such as glucuronic acid. In addition, there will be partial cellulose degradation to produce glucose. The main processes are as follows: (i) the acid hydrolysis and pyrolysis process reduces the polymerization degree of straw fiber; (ii) the crystal zone of the fiber’s mechanical fracture is destroyed in the process of quasi-mechanical fracture; (iii) the hydrogen bond breakage process rearranges the fibers [51,52,53]. Compared with other pretreatments, SE has the characteristic of completely dissolving hemicellulose. For example, mechanical grinding destroys the crystallinity of lignocellulose and fails to remove hemicellulose. Alkaline pretreatment is able to remove 80% of the hemicellulose [19].
The degradation rate of hemicellulose was 55.2% when the steam pressure was 1.6 MPa and the packing time was 90 s [54]. Under the conditions of two-step steam burst pressure of 1.1 MPa/4 min and 1.2 MPa/4 min, the enzymatic digestion rate of corn stalks increased by 12.8%, and the conversion rate of fermentation product was increased by 209% [55]. After SE at 200 °C for 15 min, the decomposition rate of hemicellulose was up to 92.7% [56,57]. Herein, steam explosion technology can effectively destroy the dense structure of the material in a short time and change its chemical composition, which is conducive to the subsequent treatment of the required substances, so it is widely used as a pretreatment method for straw biomass bioconversion. The following will be a separate introduction to the steam explosion technology.

4.1. Fiber Production

Straw is processed to extract natural fibers as the raw material for sustainable products such as paper, ecological composites, heat shields, etc. SE treatment can effectively pretreat straw fibers, destroy the proportion of straw lignin, and increase fiber bundles [58]. When the steam temperature is higher and the residence time is longer, the fibers are more uniform, the surface wetness is improved, and the quality of the fibers is enhanced by reduced ash and phenethyl alcohol extractives [47,59]. The thermal stability of wheat straw fiber is improved by 5% and its surface modification by 7–9% after SE (Kellersztein et al., 2019). When the SE-treated wheat straw remained at 200 °C for 3 min, more than 90% of the fiber bundles were observed, maintaining a more uniform material, and after blasting treatment, the reduction in straw acidity and wettability as well as the reduction in silicon content effectively improved the adhesion between straw particles and water-soluble adhesives [47]. The coconut shells and bagasse can be used to make insulation materials without the need for adhesives. Coconut shell and bagasse were treated at a hot pressing temperature of 200 °C for 13 min each to make a low-density adhesive-free insulation board with a density of 250–450 kg/m3, and it was found that the adhesive-free insulation board made of bagasse showed higher mechanical properties, and the fracture modulus (MOR) was twice that of the coconut shell and met the requirements of the relevant standard thermal insulation application building materials [60].
Cotton straw is rich in lignocellulose and can be used to make insulating fiberboard and produce pulp [61]. The composite materials of a cotton straw with NaOH (5 g/L) and steam flash blast (3 MPa, 170 °C, 4 min) combined treatment (SFE-AT) have the highest mechanical properties and stability against water. This may be due to the fact that the cotton straw fibers prepared by the SFE-AT combined treatment contain the lowest non-cellulosic impurities and have the smallest diameter, resulting in optimal adhesion between the polypropylene (PP) matrix and the cotton straw fibers [62]. In addition, there are also scholars who studied corn stalks who produced a prototype weighing 80 g/m2 by acid pre-impregnated SE (APSE)-treated (1.6 Mpa/5 min) corn stalks, and they found the explosion index of the handsheet was 0.99 kPa m2/g, its strength index close to that of waste corrugated pulp [57].

4.2. Producing Glucose

SE deselects the straw structure from lignin and dissolves hemicellulose, an economical and convenient operation process that results in higher sugar yields [19]. The study found that the glucose yield from the SE pretreatment of rapeseed straw was 29.4%, which was 17.8% higher than the control, and glucose production was also increased by 200% [48]. Continuous SE pretreatment of wheat straw was carried out at different temperatures and residence times using a pressurized mechanical refining system, and the results show that under SE pretreatment (198 °C/6 min), the total glucose yield is 85.8% under the best conditions [63]. Betula pubescens steam blast pretreatment enables efficient enzymatic glycation, and when Betula pubescens is treated at 170–230 °C for 5–15 min, it is found that enzymatically released glucose increases with the severity of the pretreatment until 220 °C for 10 min, with a maximum dissolved glucose level of 97% [64].
The use of catalysts enhances the hydrolysis of cellulose, thereby increasing sugar recovery. The straw remains at 160–190 °C for 2–10 min with 1–8% H2SO4 as the catalyst, and there will be a 73% saccharification rate [65]. The glucose conversion rate of maize straw under SE (200 °C/5 min) treatment was as high as 91.5%, and compared with the shredding storage method, the shredding decreased the sugar conversion rate but increased the sugar yield [66]. Bagasse was extracted with solvent after SE (220 °C/5 min) treatment, and the yield of reducing sugar was as high as 89.0–95.1% [67]. When sunflower stems stay under steam treatment at 180–230 °C for 5 min without recommending any catalyst, 16.7 g of glucose is obtained, while most of the hemicellulose-derived sugars released are in the oligomeric form [68]. As one of the fruit crops widely grown in the tropical subtropics, bananas produce a large amount of waste after harvesting, namely rachis and pseudo-stems. The pretreatment of rachis by SE (177 °C/5 min) and with 2.2% H2SO4 results in a total glucose yield as high as 91.0%. A pseudo-stem steam blasting pretreatment (198 °C/5 min) with 1.5% H2SO4 results in a total glucose production of 87.1% [69]. The efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis can be improved by dilute acid pretreatment, the most commonly used method for obtaining high sugar yields from lignocellulosic biomass. Therefore, acid pretreatment combined with steam blasting can result in higher sugar yields [70].

4.3. Methane Production

If straw biomass is burned in the traditional way, it may cause environmental problems [71]. Straw is considered to be one of the suitable substrates for biogas production. One of the most important methods of treating straw waste is anaerobic digestion (AD) [72]. However, because straw has a rigid structure and a high C/N ratio, it cannot be completely biodegraded during AD [73].
However, as straw biomass has a complex and stable three-dimensional structure and contains a large amount of lignin [74], it protects cellulose and hemicellulose, making its degradation by microorganisms difficult [75]. In addition to the lignin protection effect, an important factor limiting microbial degradation of straw is the percentage of carbon to nitrogen [76,77]. Previous research has shown that anaerobic microorganisms consume carbon faster than nitrogen, and the optimal C/N ratio for anaerobic digestion systems is typically in the range of 20 to 30 (w/w) [78]. When the C/N ratio is not in the optimal range of the C/N ratio for anaerobic digestion, biogas production and straw biodegradability will be negatively affected. As a renewable gas, biogas is mainly composed of methane (CH4), which can be used to produce heat or electricity [73].
In recent years, for the improvement of the anaerobic digestion efficiency of lignocellulose, the biodegradability of cellulose has been the limitation stage. In order to destroy the structure of straw waste, researchers used various experimental methods, mainly the SE method [79], the photocatalytic degradation, the acid-base method [80], the acid-base method [81], and microbiology [82]. These methods can improve the degradability of lignocellulose to varying degrees. Studies have found that SE pretreatment may increase the cellulose content in the straw. However, the hemicellulose content in the straw samples appears to have little effect on SE treatment. This result may be due to the hydrolysis of hemicellulose at the SE temperature (155 °C). According to previous studies, this happens at temperatures between 150 and 230 °C [83], which shows that the SE helped to adjust the C/N ratio during the reaction, and therefore increased the methane production [73].

4.4. Bio-Oil and Biofuel Productions

Renewable energy sources, including bioenergy, are getting a lot of attention because they are likely to become substitutes for traditional fuels or as a supplement to energy shortages in the future. Bioenergy is one of the renewable energy sources that are becoming increasingly popular worldwide because it can produce fuels that function similarly to crude oil while being better than traditional fuels in terms of the effects of pollution [84]. Biomass energy is a clean and abundant fuel that has been used to fulfil energy needs since ancient times [85]. Crop straw has the advantages of abundant resources, low cost, and environmental friendliness, so it has a broad application prospect in biofuel production. In particular, lignocellulosic biomass, straw biomass, is a renewable carbon neutral resource which can be used to produce green fuel and other products [85]. Therefore, looking for low-cost and high efficiency conversion technologies to deal with crop residues in biofuel production is very important [86].
Biofuels can be derived from biomass by thermal chemical or biochemical transformations [87]. The main products of fast pyrolysis mainly include bio-oil, whose calorific value is the same as that of biomass raw materials, but its energy density is higher than that of biomass raw materials when compared with conventional fuels, such as biological oil, so it is more convenient for transportation, which is more suitable for mass production [88]. Bio-oils are all sorts of organic liquid mixtures, which include cellulose or hemicellulose-derived sugar monomers, sugar oligomers, and sugar derivatives such as carboxylic acids [87,89].
SE can modulate the biomass morphology, composition, and properties to accommodate multiple transformation processes for subsequent biofuel production [90]. The pretreatment of SE (450 °C) using maple, switchgrass, and corn stalks as raw materials found that the bio-oil yield reached 56%, 46%, and 51 wt%, respectively [91]. The lignin left behind during the production of bioethanol can be converted into bio-oil by rapid pyrolysis. The SE pretreatment (500 °C) of wheat straw and the addition of rapid cracking using water-insoluble solids (WIS) yielded a 31.9% by weight bio-oil [92]. In order to increase the yield of bio-oil, some scholars use acid-catalyzed vapor pretreatment, and some authors have performed a 450 °C steam explosion after pretreating pine wood with 1% H2SO4 and observed a bio-oil yield of up to 63%. SE has been shown to be an effective way to maximize bio-oil quality and energy, and studies have found that wheat straw has increased its bio-oil quality and chemical energy yield by steam blasting 1.9-fold and 1.7-fold, respectively [92].

4.5. For Ethanol Production

Due to the low cost of agricultural biomass and the emissions of greenhouse gases from the burning of biomass being relatively low, bioethanol production from agricultural biomass is one of the options with the most potential for economic growth and environmental improvement [93,94]. Interestingly, bio-oil and ethanol can be continuously obtained during the biomass conversion process (Figure 4). That is, the residues after ethanol production can be rapidly pyrolyzed to obtain bio-oil, and the main components of these residues are crude protein, crude fiber, and crude fat [92,95]. Under the background of carbon emission reduction and new energy development, more advanced strategies promoting the conversion of straw biomass from lignocellulosic raw materials to bioethanol production are urgently needed [52,96].
Straw is a potential source of bioethanol and other value-added products such as oligosaccharides and lignin, unlike other industries [97]. After SE pretreatment, two forms of substances are obtained: solid and liquid, which can be filtered and separated. The solid part contains mainly cellulose and lignin, which can be used to produce biofuels such as bioethanol [92] or butanol [98]. Biomass digestibility depends on different chemical, physical, composition, and structure-related parameters [99,100,101].
It is hoped that technological advances will reduce the cost of saccharification of cellulosic materials and make ethanol production profitable. Since the many sources of raw materials are one of the reasons for the low cost of ethanol production, genetic studies aimed at improving the productivity of plants as potential energy substrates are essential [102]. The removal of hemicellulose and the conversion of lignin during SE pretreatment contributes to the improved digestibility of biomass to enzymes. For example, the SE pretreatment of straw before enzymatic saccharification showed that the enzymatic saccharification and alcoholic fermentation of straw were effectively promoted under the treatment of 3.53 MPa for 2 min. By adding chemicals or water impregnation, the biomass is hydrolyzed to a greater extent [103]. The authors found that wheat straw was treated with dilute acid H2SO4 (0.9%) for SE at different temperatures (160–200 °C) and dwell times (5, 10, and 20 min). The authors found that acid-impregnated biomass at 180 °C for 10 min provides the highest raw ethanol yield (140 L/t wheat straw) [104]. Switchgrass and bagasse were pretreated with 3% SO2 impregnated with SE, and it was found that ethanol yield increased by 18–28% under the catalysis of SO2 [105].

4.6. Potential Application in Soil Quality Improvement

In recent years, the excessive and irrational application of chemical fertilizers and land aging have attracted widespread attention. A huge amount of crop straws are generated per year [106]. Today, more than 60% of straw is returned to the fields, and this number will gradually increase [107]. Therefore, straw return is an effective strategy for the utilization of straw resources to replace chemical fertilizers. However, due to the high lignocellulose content of crop straw, it is difficult to degrade after returning it to the field, which affects the full utilization and short-term fertilizer effect of straw resources.
Straw contains a lot of trace elements, which can be used as a beneficial fertilizer for crop growth. SE can further promote the dispersion of the straw fiber, destroy the covalent bond between hemicellulose and lignin, and release effective nutrients [108]. Studies have shown that returning straw to the field is beneficial to the improvement of soil properties, thereby increasing crop yields. [109,110]. The rapid degradation of straw is particularly important. According to [111], the physicochemical properties of straw pretreated with SE were significantly adjusted. In addition, the degradation rate of cellulose and hemicellulose in the straw was significantly increased compared to the control. The SE pretreatment results in 92.7% hemicellulose solubilization and 81.3% lignin solubilization at 200 °C [112]. It is reported that SE pretreatment reduces 47–95% of hemicellulose and 5–16% cellulose of crop straw [113]. In contrast with the untreated straw, the contact angle of the straw after SE treatment was significantly reduced, the hydrophobicity of the straw was weakened, and the surface wettability of the straw was improved, indicating that the straw treated by SE had a certain water retention capacity after being added to the soil. In addition, the acidity of the straw after SE treatment increased, implying that SE straw returning has better potential for improving soil pH [47]. Moreover, the SE pretreatment can greatly reduce the pathogenic microorganism. Hence, SE-treated straws may be more suitable for crop straw return to the field.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

Straw cellulosic biomass is a tough feedstock due to the compact binding of its constituents (i.e., cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin). SE pretreatment can effectively improve the wettability of straw, reduce silicon content, improve the adhesiveness between straw particles and water-soluble adhesives, and improve fiber quality; effectively destroy the structure of straw lignocellulose, dissolve hemicellulose, and improve the digestibility of straw biomass, saccharification rate, and ethanol yield; adjust the carbon-nitrogen ratio of straw to increase methane production; and finally, adjust the structure of biomass, increasing a specific surface area and porosity, which is beneficial to the production of bio-oil. In addition, after SE pretreatment, the improvement of straw wettability, porosity, surface area, lignocellulosic structure, and other physical and chemical properties is beneficial to the release of straw nutrients, and the soil structure and water holding capacity are improved. SE has been shown to be a versatile and efficient method for the pretreatment of straw lignocellulosic biomass. SE-pretreated straw is also a very promising soil amendment.
SE pretreatment of waste straw to produce biofuel and chemical value-added products is a technology that has entered the commercialization stage. However, there is still a lot of room for improvement. For example, the main disadvantage encountered during SE is the partial degradation of hemicellulose and lignin, resulting in the formation of inhibitory compounds that negatively affect enzymes and microorganisms; therefore, future research should pay more attention to the degradation of these inhibitory compounds. Some acids in catalytic-SE technology may lead to the dissolution of cellulose and hemicellulose, resulting in the loss of dry matter as well as reduced product quality and yield, and for this reason future research should focus on the inhibition of cellulose dissolution. It is difficult to further utilize these residues by drying treatment before recycling of SE treated straw biomass, and these residues may be utilized by hydrothermal technology. SE treatment requires higher temperatures and more expensive reactor materials for better biomass treatment, and SE process parameter optimization research should be carried out in the future. In addition, there is a lack of research on the SE pretreatment of straw waste to improve soil. Research should be carried out to verify its soil improvement performance and comprehensively consider the related economic benefits.

Author Contributions

B.Z. (Baige Zhang), H.L., L.C., B.T., T.F., Y.H., J.L., Z.L. and Z.-Y.Y. collected the required literatures and prepared the manuscript; C.-Y.G. and Y.P. contributed to the design and edition of the manuscript, B.Z. (Bangxi Zhang), Q.C. and C.N. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Low carbon agriculture and carbon neutralization Research Center, GDAAS (XT202222), the Special financial fund of Foshan City—Construction project of high-level agricultural science and technology Demonstration City of Guangdong Province in 2022, the modern agricultural innovation center, Henan Institute of Sun Yat-sen University (N2021-002), the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2222-E197-001-MY2), the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (NSTC 111-2221-E-197-004).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Guangdong Joint Green Organic Tech Company Limited for providing financial funding and information on the practical application status of waste straw biomass with the steam explosion technique.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Malico, I.; Pereira, R.N.; Gonçalves, A.C.; Sousa, A.M.O. Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 112, 960–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Awasthi, M.K.; Sarsaiya, S.; Patel, A.; Juneja, A.; Singh, R.P.; Yan, B.; Awasthi, S.K.; Jain, A.; Liu, T.; Duan, Y. Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: An assessment of technology, its importance, and strategic applications in circular bio-economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 127, 109876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, K.; Song, J.; Duan, H.; Wang, S. Integrated assessment of straw utilization for energy production from views of regional energy, environmental and socioeconomic benefits. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, M.; Xu, X.; Wang, C.; Bai, Y.; Fu, C.; Zhang, L.; Fu, R.; Wang, Y. Environmental burdens of the comprehensive utilization of straw: Wheat straw utilization from a life-cycle perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tripathi, N.; Hills, C.D.; Singh, R.S.; Atkinson, C.J. Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: Harnessing a major potential resource. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2019, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Tang, H.; Muhammad, A.; Zhong, C.; Li, P.; Zhang, P.; Yang, B.; Huang, G. Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Affected by Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw Retention with Reduced Nitrogen Fertilization. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 3028–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. da Silva, M.G.; Lisbôa, A.C.L.; Hoffmann, R.; Kemerich, P.D.d.; de Borba, W.F.; Fernandes, G.D.Á.; de Souza, É.E.B. Greenhouse gas emissions of rice straw-to-methanol chain in southern Brazil. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, K.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, Y. Rural households’ willingness to accept compensation for energy utilization of crop straw in China. Energy 2018, 165, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bajwa, D.S.; Peterson, T.; Sharma, N.; Shojaeiarani, J.; Bajwa, S.G. A review of densified solid biomass for energy production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 96, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yin, X.; Wei, L.; Pan, X.; Liu, C.; Jiang, J.; Wang, K. The Pretreatment of Lignocelluloses with Green Solvent as Biorefinery Preprocess: A Minor Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 670061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Z.; Lei, F.; Li, P.; Jiang, J. Lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels and biochemicals: A comprehensive review with a focus on ethanol organosolv pretreatment technology. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 2683–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Du, X.; Qu, Y. Selective removal of lignin to enhance the process of preparing fermentable sugars and platform chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aguilar-Reynosa, A.; Romaní, A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Garrote, G.; Ruiz, H.A. Comparison of microwave and conduction-convection heating autohydrolysis pretreatment for bioethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rezania, S.; Oryani, B.; Cho, J.; Talaiekhozani, A.; Sabbagh, F.; Hashemi, B.; Rupani, P.F.; Mohammadi, A.A. Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview. Energy 2020, 199, 117457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Scapini, T.; Dos Santos, M.S.; Bonatto, C.; Wancura, J.H.; Mulinari, J.; Camargo, A.F.; Treichel, H. Hydrothermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for hemicellulose recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 126033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumari, D.; Singh, R. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 877–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, Y.; Wu, J.; Ren, X.; Lau, A.; Rezaei, H.; Takada, M.; Bi, X.; Sokhansanj, S. Steam explosion of lignocellulosic biomass for multiple advanced bioenergy processes: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monschein, M.; Nidetzky, B. Effect of pretreatment severity in continuous steam explosion on enzymatic conversion of wheat straw: Evidence from kinetic analysis of hydrolysis time courses. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beig, B.; Riaz, M.; Naqvi, S.R.; Hassan, M.; Zheng, Z.; Karimi, K.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Atabani, A.E.; Chi, N.T.L. Current challenges and innovative developments in pretreatment of lignocellulosic residues for biofuel production: A review. Fuel 2021, 287, 119670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, Y.; Pang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, K. Physicochemical characterization of rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide in the solid state for enhancing biogas production. Energy Fuel. 2008, 22, 2775–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boonterm, M.; Sunyadeth, S.; Dedpakdee, S.; Athichalinthorn, P.; Patcharaphun, S.; Mungkung, R.; Techapiesancharoenkij, R. Characterization and comparison of cellulose fiber extraction from rice straw by chemical treatment and thermal steam explosion. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 134, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Semwal, S.; Raj, T.; Kumar, R.; Christopher, J.; Gupta, R.P.; Puri, S.K.; Kumar, R.; Ramakumar, S. Process optimization and mass balance studies of pilot scale steam explosion pretreatment of rice straw for higher sugar release. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 130, 105390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. lvarez, C.; Sáez, F.; González, A.; Ballesteros, I.; Oliva, J.M.; Negro, M.J. Production of xylooligosaccharides and cellulosic ethanol from steam-exploded barley straw. Holzforschung. 2019, 73, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Steinbach, D.; Wüst, D.; Zielonka, S.; Krümpel, J.; Munder, S.; Pagel, M.; Kruse, A. Steam Explosion Conditions Highly Influence the Biogas Yield of Rice Straw. Molecules 2019, 24, 3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Millati, R.; Wikandari, R.; Ariyanto, T.; Putri, R.U.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Pretreatment technologies for anaerobic digestion of lignocelluloses and toxic feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 122998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yin, H.; Zhao, W.; Li, T.; Cheng, X.; Liu, Q. Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China: Role of straw nutrient resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2695–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, Y.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Y. State of the art of straw treatment technology: Challenges and solutions forward. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, Z.; Shah, T.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Peng, S.; Nie, L. Effect of straw returning on soil organic carbon in rice–wheat rotation system: A review. Food Energy Secur. 2020, 9, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gou, G.; Wang, Q.; Xie, W.; Cao, J.; Jiang, M.; He, J.; Zhou, Z. Assessment of Instant Catapult Steam Explosion Treatment on Rice Straw for Isolation of High Quality Cellulose. BioResources 2018, 13, 2328–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tupciauskas, R.; Rizhikovs, J.; Brazdausks, P.; Fridrihsone, V.; Andzs, M. Influence of steam explosion pre-treatment conditions on binder-less boards from hemp shives and wheat straw. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 170, 113717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. lvarez, C.; González, A.; Alonso, J.L.; Sáez, F.; Negro, M.J.; Gullón, B. Xylooligosaccharides from steam-exploded barley straw: Structural features and assessment of bifidogenic properties. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 124, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Quiñones, T.S.; Retter, A.; Hobbs, P.J.; Budde, J.; Heiermann, M.; Plöchl, M.; Ravella, S.R. Production of xylooligosaccharides from renewable agricultural lignocellulose biomass. Biofuels 2015, 6, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kargbo, F.; Xing, J.; Zhang, Y. Property analysis and pretreatment of rice straw for energy use in grain drying: A review. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2010, 1, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Satlewal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Bhagia, S.; Das, P.; Ragauskas, A.J. Rice straw as a feedstock for biofuels: Availability, recalcitrance, and chemical properties. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2018, 12, 83–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, F.; Xie, G.; Huang, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, A.; Li, X.; Xia, T.; et al. OsCESA9 conserved-site mutation leads to largely enhanced plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic saccharification by reducing cellulose DP and crystallinity in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1093–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. A comprehensive review on pre-treatment strategy for lignocellulosic food industry waste: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, H.; Xu, J.; Sheng, L. Preparation of straw biochar and application of constructed wetland in China: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bundhoo, Z.M. Potential of bio-hydrogen production from dark fermentation of crop residues: A review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 17346–17362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dhanasekar, R.; Jonesh, S. Identification of a novel hydrogen producing bacteria from sugarcane bagasse waste. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 15, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, M.F.S.; Akbar, M.; Xu, Z.; Wang, H. A review on the role of pretreatment technologies in the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass of corn stover. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 155, 106276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Fan, J.; Clark, J.H.; Hu, C. The production of furfural directly from hemicellulose in lignocellulosic biomass: A review. Catal. Today 2019, 319, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tian, S.-Q.; Zhao, R.-Y.; Chen, Z.-C. Review of the pretreatment and bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass from wheat straw materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ashoor, S.; Sukumaran, R.K. Mild alkaline pretreatment can achieve high hydrolytic and fermentation efficiencies for rice straw conversion to bioethanol. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 50, 814–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, B.; Yang, W.; Nie, Y.; Kang, F.; Goff, H.D.; Cui, S.W. Effect of steam explosion on dietary fiber, polysaccharide, protein and physicochemical properties of okara. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Theuretzbacher, F.; Lizasoain, J.; Lefever, C.; Saylor, M.K.; Enguidanos, R.; Weran, N.; Bauer, A. Steam explosion pretreatment of wheat straw to improve methane yields: Investigation of the degradation kinetics of structural compounds during anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 179, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, J.; Yin, Q.Q.; Ren, T.B.; Song, A.D.; Zuo, R.Y.; Guo, H.W. Effect of Steam Explosion Pretreatment and Microbial Fermentation on Degradation of Corn Straw. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 343, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Han, G.; Deng, J.; Zhang, S.; Bicho, P.; Wu, Q. Effect of steam explosion treatment on characteristics of wheat straw. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 31, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Garmakhany, A.D.; Kashaninejad, M.; Aalami, M.; Maghsoudlou, Y.; Khomieri, M.; Tabil, L.G. Enhanced biomass delignification and enzymatic saccharification of canola straw by steam-explosion pretreatment. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1607–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sui, W.; Chen, H. Effects of water states on steam explosion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bolado-Rodríguez, S.; Toquero, C.; Martín-Juárez, J.; Travaini, R.; García-Encina, P.A. Effect of thermal, acid, alkaline and alkaline-peroxide pretreatments on the biochemical methane potential and kinetics of the anaerobic digestion of wheat straw and sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 201, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Laser, M.; Schulman, D.; Allen, S.G.; Lichwa, J.; Antal, M.J.; Lynd, L.R. A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 81, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mosier, N.; Wyman, C.; Dale, B.; Elander, R.; Lee, Y.Y.; Holtzapple, M.; Ladisch, M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ohgren, K.; Rudolf, A.; Galbe, M.; Zacchi, G. Fuel ethanol production from steam-pretreated corn stover using SSF at higher dry matter content. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 863–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, B.; Chen, K.; Gao, X.; Zhao, C.; Shao, Q.; Sun, Q.; Li, H. Influence of steam explosion on rice straw fiber content. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2015, 9, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Fu, X.; Chen, H. Pretreatment based on two-step steam explosion combined with an intermediate separation of fiber cells-Optimization of fermentation of corn straw hydrolysates. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 121, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Oliveira, F.M.; Pinheiro, I.O.; Souto-Maior, A.M.; Martin, C.; Gonçalves, A.R.; Rocha, G.J. Industrial-scale steam explosion pretreatment of sugarcane straw for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for production of second generation ethanol and value-added products. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zaldivar, J.; Nielsen, J.; Olsson, L. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: A challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2001, 56, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kaushik, A.; Singh, M. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw using steam explosion coupled with high shear homogenization. Carbohyd. Res. 2011, 346, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Han, G.; Cheng, W.; Deng, J.; Dai, C.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Q. Effect of pressurized steam treatment on selected properties of wheat straws. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009, 30, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Panyakaew, S.; Fotios, S. New thermal insulation boards made from coconut husk and bagasse. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 1732–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zheng, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Lu, F. Overexpression of a Paenibacillus campinasensis xylanase in Bacillus megaterium and its applications to biobleaching of cotton stalk pulp and saccharification of recycled paper sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 125, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hou, X.; Sun, F.; Yan, D.; Xu, H.; Dong, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y. Preparation of lightweight polypropylene composites reinforced by cotton stalk fibers from combined steam flash-explosion and alkaline treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 83, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xiaowei, P.; Hongzhang, C. Hemicellulose sugar recovery from steam-exploded wheat straw for microbial oil production. Process. Biochem. 2012, 47, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vivekanand, V.; Olsen, E.F.; Eijsink, V.G.; Horn, S.J. Effect of different steam explosion conditions on methane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, W.-H.; Tsai, C.-C.; Lin, C.-F.; Tsai, P.-Y.; Hwang, W.-S. Pilot-scale study on the acid-catalyzed steam explosion of rice straw using a continuous pretreatment system. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, Z.-H.; Qin, L.; Jin, M.-J.; Pang, F.; Li, B.-Z.; Kang, Y.; Dale, B.E.; Yuan, Y.-J. Evaluation of storage methods for the conversion of corn stover biomass to sugars based on steam explosion pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 132, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, J.; Lin, J.; Xiao, W.; Gong, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhou, P.; Liu, Z. Solvent extraction of antioxidants from steam exploded sugarcane bagasse and enzymatic convertibility of the solid fraction. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ruiz, E.; Cara, C.; Manzanares, P.; Ballesteros, M.; Castro, E. Evaluation of steam explosion pre-treatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of sunflower stalks. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2008, 42, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guerrero, A.B.; Ballesteros, I.; Ballesteros, M. Optimal conditions of acid-catalysed steam explosion pretreatment of banana lignocellulosic biomass for fermentable sugar production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 92, 2351–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Singh, J.; Suhag, M.; Dhaka, A. Augmented digestion of lignocellulose by steam explosion, acid and alkaline pretreatment methods: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X. Effect of Ca(OH)2 pretreatment on extruded rice straw anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 196, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wei, Y.; Yuan, H.; Wachemo, A.C.; Li, X. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and liquid fraction of digestate (LFD) pretreated corn stover: Pretreatment process optimization and evolution of microbial community structure. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 296, 122282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaldis, F.; Cysneiros, D.; Day, J.; Karatzas, K.-A.G.; Chatzifragkou, A. Anaerobic Digestion of Steam-Exploded Wheat Straw and Co-Digestion Strategies for Enhanced Biogas Production. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fernandes, T.; Bos, G.K.; Zeeman, G.; Sanders, J.; van Lier, J. Effects of thermo-chemical pre-treatment on anaerobic biodegradability and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 2575–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Huang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, T.; Sun, S.; Ren, J.; Wu, A.; Li, H. A novel wet-mechanochemical pretreatment for the efficient enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses: Small dosage dilute alkali assisted ball milling. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 194, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ferreira, L.; Donoso-Bravo, A.; Nilsen, P.; Fdz-Polanco, F.; Pérez-Elvira, S. Influence of thermal pretreatment on the biochemical methane potential of wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 143, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pohl, M.; Heeg, K.; Mumme, J. Anaerobic digestion of wheat straw—Performance of continuous solid-state digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Estevez, M.M.; Linjordet, R.; Morken, J. Effects of steam explosion and co-digestion in the methane production from Salix by mesophilic batch assays. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. González-Fernández, C.; León-Cofreces, C.; García-Encina, P.A. Different pretreatments for increasing the anaerobic biodegradability in swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 8710–8714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ferreira, L.; Souza, T.; Fdz-Polanco, F.; Pérez-Elvira, S. Thermal steam explosion pretreatment to enhance anaerobic biodegradability of the solid fraction of pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, Q.; Hu, J.; Lee, D.-J. Biogas from anaerobic digestion processes: Research updates. Renew. Energy 2016, 98, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, W.; Fu, S.; Yang, Z.; Lu, J.; Guo, R. Improved methane production from corn straw by microaerobic pretreatment with a pure bacteria system. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 259, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, P.; Wang, B.; Xiao, Q.; Wu, S. A kinetics modeling study on the inhibition of glucose on cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 190, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Faaij, A. Modern biomass conversion technologies. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl. 2006, 11, 343–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Paul, A.S.; Kumar, H.; Panwar, N.L.; Kharpude, S. Experimental Investigation of Eco Friendly Biomass Fired Water Heating System. Waste Biomass Valorization 2016, 7, 1491–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tian, Y.; Wang, F.; Djandja, J.O.; Zhang, S.-L.; Xu, Y.-P.; Duan, P.-G. Hydrothermal liquefaction of crop straws: Effect of feedstock composition. Fuel 2020, 265, 116946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mohan, D.; Pittman, C.U., Jr.; Steele, P.H. Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 848–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gollakota, A.; Kishore, N.; Gu, S. A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1378–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hu, X.; Wang, Y.; Mourant, D.; Gunawan, R.; Lievens, C.; Chaiwat, W.; Gholizadeh, M.; Wu, L.; Li, X.; Li, C.-Z. Polymerization on heating up of bio-oil: A model compound study. AIChE J. 2013, 59, 888–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Duque, A.; Manzanares, P.; Ballesteros, I.; Ballesteros, M. Steam explosion as lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. In Biomass Fractionation Technologies for a Lignocellulosic Feedstock Based Biorefinery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 349–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, H.; Srinivasan, R.; Yu, F.; Steele, P.; Li, Q.; Mitchell, B.; Samala, A. Effect of Acid, Steam Explosion, and Size Reduction Pretreatments on Bio-oil Production from Sweetgum, Switchgrass, and Corn Stover. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tomás-Pejó, E.; Fermoso, J.; Herrador, E.; Hernando, H.; Jiménez-Sánchez, S.; Ballesteros, M.; González-Fernández, C.; Serrano, D. Valorization of steam-exploded wheat straw through a biorefinery approach: Bioethanol and bio-oil co-production. Fuel 2017, 199, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chandel, A.K.; Kapoor, R.K.; Singh, A.; Kuhad, R.C. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1947–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, L.; Chen, H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose materials treated with ionic liquid [BMIM] Cl. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2006, 51, 2432–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Toor, S.S.; Rosendahl, L.; Nielsen, M.P.; Glasius, M.; Rudolf, A.; Iversen, S.B. Continuous production of bio-oil by catalytic liquefaction from wet distiller’s grain with solubles (WDGS) from bio-ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 36, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Berlin, A.; Balakshin, M.; Gilkes, N.; Kadla, J.; Maximenko, V.; Kubo, S.; Saddler, J. Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 125, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. lvarez, C.; González, A.; Ballesteros, I.; Negro, M.J. Production of xylooligosaccharides, bioethanol, and lignin from structural components of barley straw pretreated with a steam explosion. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 125953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Qureshi, N.; Cotta, M.; Saha, B. Bioconversion of barley straw and corn stover to butanol (a biofuel) in integrated fermentation and simultaneous product recovery bioreactors. Food Bioprod. Process. 2014, 92, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kellock, M.; Maaheimo, H.; Marjamaa, K.; Rahikainen, J.; Zhang, H.; Holopainen-Mantila, U.; Ralph, J.; Tamminen, T.; Felby, C.; Kruus, K. Effect of hydrothermal pretreatment severity on lignin inhibition in enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 280, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Meng, X.; Pu, Y.; Yoo, C.G.; Li, M.; Bali, G.; Park, D.-Y.; Gjersing, E.; Davis, M.F.; Muchero, W.; Tuskan, G.A.; et al. An In-Depth Understanding of Biomass Recalcitrance Using Natural Poplar Variants as the Feedstock. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Woiciechowski, A.L.; Neto, C.J.D.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Sydney, A.C.N.; Letti, L.A.J.; Karp, S.G.; Torres, L.A.Z.; Soccol, C.R. Lignocellulosic biomass: Acid and alkaline pretreatments and their effects on biomass recalcitrance—Conventional processing and recent advances. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 122848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Smuga-Kogut, M.; Walendzik, B.; Szymanowska-Powalowska, D.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Wojdalski, J.; Wieczorek, M.; Cielecka-Piontek, J. Comparison of Bioethanol Preparation from Triticale Straw Using the Ionic Liquid and Sulfate Methods. Energies 2019, 12, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Moniruzzaman, M. Saccharification and alcohol fermentation of steam-exploded rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 55, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shafiei, M.; Kabir, M.M.; Zilouei, H.; Horváth, I.S.; Karimi, K. Techno-economical study of biogas production improved by steam explosion pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 148, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ewanick, S.; Bura, R. The effect of biomass moisture content on bioethanol yields from steam pretreated switchgrass and sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2651–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, B.; Wu, Q.; Wang, F.; Zhang, B. Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis. Energy 2019, 171, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Cui, X.; Guo, L.; Li, C.; Liu, M.; Wu, G.; Jiang, G. The total biomass nitrogen reservoir and its potential of replacing chemical fertilizers in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, Z.; Qin, L.; Pang, F.; Jin, M.J.; Li, B.Z.; Kang, Y.; Yuan, Y. Effects of biomass particle size on steam explosion pretreatment performance for improving the enzyme digestibility of corn stover. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 44, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lun, F.; Canadell, J.; Mou-Cheng, L.; Yang, B.; Liu, M.-C.; Yuan, Z.; Tian, M.; Liu, J.-G.; Li, W.-H. Estimating cropland carbon mitigation potentials in China affected by three improved cropland practices. J. Mt. Sci. 2016, 13, 1840–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liu, C.; Lu, M.; Cui, J.; Li, B.; Fang, C. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 1366–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, J.; Yan, B.H.; Wang, Y.; Yong, X.Y.; Yang, Z.H.; Jia, H.H.; Jiang, M.; Wei, P. Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of rice straw. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 88417–88425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. da Silva, A.S.A.; Inoue, H.; Endo, T.; Yano, S.; Bon, E.P. Milling pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and straw for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7402–7409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Chen, X.-J.; Lin, Q.-M.; Rizwan, M.; Zhao, X.-R.; Li, G.-T. Steam explosion of crop straws improves the characteristics of biochar as a soil amendment. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 1486–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 10 01959 g001 550
Figure 1. Micro-structure of straw biomass.
Figure 1. Micro-structure of straw biomass.
Processes 10 01959 g001
Processes 10 01959 g002 550
Figure 2. Roles of steam explosion in the production of bioproducts and energy substances.
Figure 2. Roles of steam explosion in the production of bioproducts and energy substances.
Processes 10 01959 g002
Processes 10 01959 g003 550
Figure 3. Annual corn production by country in the world in 2020 (A) and global annual rice production in 2016 (B).
Figure 3. Annual corn production by country in the world in 2020 (A) and global annual rice production in 2016 (B).
Processes 10 01959 g003
Processes 10 01959 g004 550
Figure 4. Steam explosion coupling bioconversion process for continuous production of ethanol and bio-oil.
Figure 4. Steam explosion coupling bioconversion process for continuous production of ethanol and bio-oil.
Processes 10 01959 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, B.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Fu, T.; Tang, B.; Hao, Y.; Li, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Q.; et al. Recent Advances in the Bioconversion of Waste Straw Biomass with Steam Explosion Technique: A Comprehensive Review. Processes 2022, 10, 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101959

AMA Style

Zhang B, Li H, Chen L, Fu T, Tang B, Hao Y, Li J, Li Z, Zhang B, Chen Q, et al. Recent Advances in the Bioconversion of Waste Straw Biomass with Steam Explosion Technique: A Comprehensive Review. Processes. 2022; 10(10):1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101959

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Baige, Hongzhao Li, Limei Chen, Tianhong Fu, Bingbing Tang, Yongzhou Hao, Jing Li, Zheng Li, Bangxi Zhang, Qing Chen, and et al. 2022. "Recent Advances in the Bioconversion of Waste Straw Biomass with Steam Explosion Technique: A Comprehensive Review" Processes 10, no. 10: 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101959

APA Style

Zhang, B., Li, H., Chen, L., Fu, T., Tang, B., Hao, Y., Li, J., Li, Z., Zhang, B., Chen, Q., Nie, C., You, Z.-Y., Guan, C.-Y., & Peng, Y. (2022). Recent Advances in the Bioconversion of Waste Straw Biomass with Steam Explosion Technique: A Comprehensive Review. Processes, 10(10), 1959. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101959

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop