Next Article in Journal
Identification of Going-Concern Risks in CSR and Integrated Reports of Polish Companies from the Construction and Property Development Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Liability for Incorrect Client Personalization in the Distribution of Consumer Insurance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk Approach—Risk Hierarchy or Construction Investment Risks in the Light of Interim Empiric Primary Research Conclusions

by
Tibor Pál Szemere
,
Mónika Garai-Fodor
and
Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir
*
Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Risks 2021, 9(5), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050084
Submission received: 8 March 2021 / Revised: 20 April 2021 / Accepted: 20 April 2021 / Published: 1 May 2021

Abstract

The focus of this study is to examine the investment project process. Since investment can also be considered as economic interactions, certain risks are associated with their implementation. Risk factors were given a particular priority during the secondary and primary research, while determining the most relevant risk factors of investment project processes in relation to the B2B market. The risk map for investment project processes was created in line with the relevant secondary sources, qualitative and quantitative primary results. This is topical because the importance of investments is unquestionable in a market economy. Therefore, a comprehensive risk assessment might provide results that are useful for both supply and demand side actors in B2B market relations. Based on the results of the primary study, the perceived risks of the project process were defined, and they were structured into a risk hierarchy system. Based on the qualitative results, we performed a quantitative study. Based on the responses of the sample subjects, we determined the perceived risk factors, and on the basis of them, we segmented the service provider (contractor) market. The main socio-demographic characteristics of each segment were also explored in the framework of the research.
Keywords: investment; risk; risk approach; primary research investment; risk; risk approach; primary research

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szemere, T.P.; Garai-Fodor, M.; Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. Risk Approach—Risk Hierarchy or Construction Investment Risks in the Light of Interim Empiric Primary Research Conclusions. Risks 2021, 9, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050084

AMA Style

Szemere TP, Garai-Fodor M, Csiszárik-Kocsir Á. Risk Approach—Risk Hierarchy or Construction Investment Risks in the Light of Interim Empiric Primary Research Conclusions. Risks. 2021; 9(5):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szemere, Tibor Pál, Mónika Garai-Fodor, and Ágnes Csiszárik-Kocsir. 2021. "Risk Approach—Risk Hierarchy or Construction Investment Risks in the Light of Interim Empiric Primary Research Conclusions" Risks 9, no. 5: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050084

APA Style

Szemere, T. P., Garai-Fodor, M., & Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. (2021). Risk Approach—Risk Hierarchy or Construction Investment Risks in the Light of Interim Empiric Primary Research Conclusions. Risks, 9(5), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop