Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effects of Gainsharing Provisions on the Selection of a Discount Rate for a Defined Benefit Pension Plan
Previous Article in Journal
State Space Models and the Kalman-Filter in Stochastic Claims Reserving: Forecasting, Filtering and Smoothing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Management under Omega Measure
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Actuarial Geometry

St. John’s University, Peter J. Tobin College of Business, 101 Astor Place, New York, NY 10003, USA
Academic Editor: Albert Cohen
Risks 2017, 5(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5020031
Received: 12 April 2017 / Revised: 16 May 2017 / Accepted: 2 June 2017 / Published: 16 June 2017
The literature on capital allocation is biased towards an asset modeling framework rather than an actuarial framework. The asset modeling framework leads to the proliferation of inappropriate assumptions about the effect of insurance line of business growth on aggregate loss distributions. This paper explains why an actuarial analog of the asset volume/return model should be based on a Lévy process. It discusses the impact of different loss models on marginal capital allocations. It shows that Lévy process-based models provide a better fit to the US statutory accounting data, and identifies how parameter risk scales with volume and increases with time. Finally, it shows the data suggest a surprising result regarding the form of insurance parameter risk. View Full-Text
Keywords: capital; capital allocation; capital determination; diversification; homogeneous; insurance; insurance pricing; Lévy process; parameter risk; risk measure; risk theory capital; capital allocation; capital determination; diversification; homogeneous; insurance; insurance pricing; Lévy process; parameter risk; risk measure; risk theory
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mildenhall, S.J. Actuarial Geometry. Risks 2017, 5, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5020031

AMA Style

Mildenhall SJ. Actuarial Geometry. Risks. 2017; 5(2):31. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5020031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mildenhall, Stephen J. 2017. "Actuarial Geometry" Risks 5, no. 2: 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5020031

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop