Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Gold, Silver, and Bitcoin Volatility on Banking Systemic Risk: Safe-Haven or Amplifier?
Previous Article in Journal
Public-Data Causal Multiscale Wavelet Spillover Learning for Stock Index Volatility Forecasting and Risk Early Warning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Unified Longevity–Financial Risk Framework for Evaluating Pension Funding Ratios

Department of Law, Economics and Sociology, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa Loc. Germaneto, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Risks 2026, 14(6), 130; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14060130
Submission received: 13 April 2026 / Revised: 18 May 2026 / Accepted: 4 June 2026 / Published: 10 June 2026

Abstract

Defined-benefit pension funds face simultaneous exposure to longevity risk and financial market volatility, yet most regulatory frameworks assess these risks in isolation using deterministic methods. This paper examines how their joint occurrence affects fund solvency measured by the funding ratio. We develop an integrated stochastic framework combining a generalized Lee–Carter model with cohort effects for mortality, a two-state Markov regime-switching process for asset returns, and a Cox–Ingersoll–Ross model for stochastic interest rates; liabilities are valued under the risk-neutral measure. The model is calibrated to Italian ISTAT/HMD mortality data and institutional benchmarks over 2000–2023; solvency risk is quantified via value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk of the funding ratio at one-, five-, and ten-year horizons (M=50,000 Monte Carlo scenarios). Financial risk dominates at the one-year horizon (CVaR0.99=59.1 percentage points), while longevity risk grows from 4% of the total tail risk at one year to 21% at ten years. The stochastic VaR0.99 exceeds deterministic reserves by a factor of 4.8×, and the standard modular aggregation formula overestimates combined risk by up to five percentage points due to its Gaussian copula assumption. These results demonstrate that integrated stochastic modeling is essential for sound regulatory capital assessment under the IORP II framework.
Keywords: pension fund solvency; longevity risk; stochastic mortality; Lee–Carter model; regime-switching; funding ratio; value-at-risk; CVaR; CIR model; IORP II pension fund solvency; longevity risk; stochastic mortality; Lee–Carter model; regime-switching; funding ratio; value-at-risk; CVaR; CIR model; IORP II

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rania, F. A Unified Longevity–Financial Risk Framework for Evaluating Pension Funding Ratios. Risks 2026, 14, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14060130

AMA Style

Rania F. A Unified Longevity–Financial Risk Framework for Evaluating Pension Funding Ratios. Risks. 2026; 14(6):130. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14060130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rania, Francesco. 2026. "A Unified Longevity–Financial Risk Framework for Evaluating Pension Funding Ratios" Risks 14, no. 6: 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14060130

APA Style

Rania, F. (2026). A Unified Longevity–Financial Risk Framework for Evaluating Pension Funding Ratios. Risks, 14(6), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14060130

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop