Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
ChildrenChildren
  • Editor’s Choice
  • Review
  • Open Access

22 April 2022

22 Pages

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Mental Health Disorders: A Narrative Review of the Literature †

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
MSc Program “Strategies of Developmental and Adolescent Health”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
2
Center for Adolescent Medicine and UNESCO Chair Adolescent Health Care, First Department of Pediatrics, “Agia Sophia” Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece
3
Pediatric Orthopaedic Department, Athens Medical Center, 151 25 Athens, Greece
4
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, “Alexandra” Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece

Abstract

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis. The condition begins in puberty, affects 1–4% of adolescents, and disproportionately affects young women. Our aim was to comprehensively examine the association between AIS and risk for depression, anxiety, eating disorders, psychotic disorders, and personality dysfunctional mechanisms. Methods: Literature review of related articles published in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to 15 July 2021. Results: A total of 30 studies were deemed eligible, examining the effects of AIS upon mental health, and using appropriate psychometric inventories. Studies highlighted the association of brace treatment with elevated anxiety. In addition, mental health conditions and traits (e.g., anxiety and depressive symptoms, neuroticism) were detected more frequently amongst AIS patients compared to healthy controls. Conclusions: AIS represents a risk factor for mental health disorders. More longitudinal studies, utilizing accurate psychometric instruments, are warranted, to reveal the current impact of AIS on the mental health of youngsters, along with the tailoring of well-targeted interventions to reduce the burden of mental health issues in adulthood.

1. Introduction

Scoliosis is defined as a three-dimensional (3D) structural deformity of the spine and for practical reasons it is widely diagnosed radiographically, on the basis of the measurement of the Cobb angle. A Cobb angle is used as a measurement of the degree of spinal curvature; thus, scoliosis is present in case of at least 10 degrees of deviation [1]. In most cases, the etiology of scoliosis is multifactorial, and since 1922 these patients have received the diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis [2]. Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is classified into three categories, depending on the peak period of onset: the infantile, which occurs under the age of three; the juvenile, from five to eight years old; and the adolescent, which affects teenagers from 10 to 19 years old [3]. The latter accounts for 80% of idiopathic scoliosis cases, and a meta-analysis on its prevalence has shown a range from 0.47 to 5.2%, after school-screening [4].
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) involves high possibilities of progression, primarily amongst girls during the growth spurt at puberty [5]. From mild to moderate deformities, bracing is the most common type of conservative treatment aiming at controlling such progression, whereas curves greater than 40 degrees require surgery [6]. When untreated, idiopathic scoliosis may lead to severe trunk deformities, which might cause limitations to the general quality of life and well-being of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis [7]. However, regardless of the treatment prescribed, there is a critical threshold in the current literature between 30° and 50° associated with a high risk of long-term curve progression [8]. Therefore, in many cases, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis progresses in adult life and is usually combined with significant clinical problems [9].
An accurate diagnosis of AIS includes a combination of individual factors concerning the Cobb angle, the angle trunk rotation (ATR), the sagittal balance, the Risser sign, which indicates the level of skeletal maturity, and the pulmonary function measured by spirometry [10,11]. Hence, the goals of conservative treatment, from observation to bracing and physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE), have been accordingly adapted, in order to control curve progression, to avoid surgery, and to prevent or treat respiratory dysfunction [12].
Bearing in mind the critical period of the appearance of AIS, many studies have marked the psychological impact of various parameters regarding AIS [13]. Bracing, poor body image, due to the deformities, and pre- and post-operative pain of surgery have been outlined as stressful factors for youngsters, in addition to the need for psychological adjustment and compliance to the treatment [14,15].
In parallel, childhood and adolescence is the core risk period for the development of mental health issues, ranging from transient mild symptoms to more severe disorders. Anxiety disorders have been reported as the most common condition (31.9%), followed by behavior disorders (19.1%), and mood disorders (14.3%) [16]. Anxiety has been perceived as a comorbid condition with many mental disorders, such as psychosis [17], but also with medical conditions such as musculoskeletal conditions [18]. Additionally, eating disorders represent an important issue amongst teenagers, with high incidence rates [19]. Furthermore, personality disorders and personality traits such as neuroticism, dependency, and introversion have been investigated as predictors for maladaptation and future psychopathology [20,21].
Consequently, this review of the literature aims to evaluate the association between AIS and mental health disorders, on the basis of specialized instruments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

A literature search was performed on 30 May 2021 in three different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar). For the search, various key-words were used: idiopathic scoliosis, teenagers, youngster, adolescence, young adults, mental disorders, psychopathology, eating disorders, anorexia, bulimia, mood disorders, depression, emotional reactions, cyclothymic disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, anxiety, and stress. Those terms were used in pairs, using “AND” or “OR”, in order to receive specified results.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

This review aims to investigate the association between AIS and mental health disorders, or indices of psychopathology, in adolescence or in adulthood. For this reason, eligible articles had to meet the following criteria:
  • Studies had to report on adolescents or young adults with a diagnosis of AIS in their puberty, in terms of retrospective studies.
  • Studies could be purely based on AIS, present results on a subgroup analyses on AIS, or encompass AIS cases as the majority of the study sample.
  • Studies had to provide data about the correlation between AIS and mental health disorders, as defined by appropriate psychometric instruments. Any strategy to diagnose AIS was deemed eligible.
  • Prospective cohort/cross-sectional/case-control/retrospective/large-data based epidemiological studies/reliability and validity analyses of questionnaires were included.
  • The article was written in English language.
  • There was no restriction in publication year.

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

Articles meeting the following criteria were excluded from the review:
  • Articles evaluating different aspects of patients’ well-being and psychological function utilizing generic inventories.
  • Articles exclusively on other types of scoliosis were also excluded (congenital, neuromuscular, degenerative, Scheuermann’s kyphosis, or syndromic)
  • Literature reviews; however, these were screened for relevant resources not found via search terms.

2.4. Data Abstraction

Numerous studies were retrieved from the databases. After the first check, a great number was excluded by title or abstract. The studies that were considered eligible were evaluated in full-text and separately tabulated on the basis of the mental health condition they assessed. From each study, analytic characteristics were extracted concerning the study design, the sample size, the percentage of males, study population, assessment of scoliosis, evaluation of mental health disorder, treatment prescribed, severity of the main curve, and the main findings.

3. Results

3.1. Study Characteristics

A total of 30 studies, from 1992 to 2021, were included in the present review [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Most of those included were cross-sectional, (15 of 30), including eight from Poland, two from China, two from United Kingdom, two Italian, and one from Spain. The others were mainly prospective cohort studies, including seven ranging from Poland, USA, and Taiwan to UK and Sweden. Among the remaining ones, there were four case-controlled studies, one registered audit from the UK, an Iranian validation study, and one clinical trial from Spain. The percentages of male patients were significantly lower (range: 0–41%) and only one study was exclusively based on male subjects with scoliosis [50]. Most cases of idiopathic scoliosis detected were adolescent type, with an overall moderate severity (20–40°) treated by brace. With regards to mental health disorders, nine studies examined stress/anxiety, three studied depressions, eight studied jointly the aforementioned conditions, four examined eating disorders, five studied personality pathology, and two studied schizophrenia. The study of Oh et al. [43] was added in both the latter categories. Demographic characteristics are represented in Table 1.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the included studies.
The tables present the studies on the association between AIS and stress/anxiety, depression, joint examination of depression and anxiety, eating disorders, personality disorders and traits, and psychotic disorders (Table 1 and Table 2).
Table 2. Main Findings of the included studies.

3.2. Results of Individual Studies

The majority of the studies found during the literature research marked the association between AIS and increased levels of stress/anxiety. Nine studies from 2001 to 2018, indicated an overall moderate to low stress amongst a large part of the adolescent population treated by brace, surgery, or physiotherapy (Table 1 and Table 2). On the one hand, Misterska [25,26], as well as Motlagh [27], Kotwicki [28], and Leszczewska et al. [29], using the same inventory of BSBQ, concluded that the brace increased the level of stress in comparison to the stress induced by the deformity alone. Similarly, Glowacki et al. [22], evaluated the anxiety of braced adolescents by STAI-C inventory, showing a constant brace-related anxiety during a 12-month observation period. Two additional parameters that Mistreska et al. pointed out pertained to the statistically significant correlation between apical translation and stress level, as well as the age of initiation of the conservative treatment [24]. However, from the studies jointly examining depression and anxiety (Table 1 and Table 2), Sanders et al. found that 32% of patients with AIS exhibited significant psychological distress, regardless of the type of treatment. In this study, anxiety represented the most common concern for teenagers, with a similar occurrence as in pediatric cancer and heart transplant patients [39]. Supportive evidence was provided by a recent large-database epidemiologic study from 2012 to 2016, showing that among the overall prevalence of 7% of mental health disorders in AIS patients, the highest percentages were attributed to anxiety [41].
On the other hand, adolescents with severe scoliosis requiring surgery, experienced a significant increase in anxiety levels postoperatively, which was explained by the pain intensity [21]. Rullander et al. marked a similar correlation between the level of pain and anxiety (p = 0.03) in Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children, reporting that the studied adolescents had higher stress symptoms before, than after, surgery [40]. The higher symptoms of anxiety in AIS surgery patients compared to healthy controls was also demonstrated by the study of Duramaz et al.; although, indicating a notable decrease in such symptoms after the spinal correction [35]. The stressful experience of scoliosis surgery was also indicated by the scores of HADS anxiety inventory in another study, concluding that operative treatment resulted in elevated levels of anxiety [38]. From a similar biopsychosocial perspective, Wong et al. demonstrated a remarkable prevalence of back pain amongst AIS patients, regardless of a surgical treatment. The high prevalence of chronic back pain increased the odds for anxiety, depression, insomnia, and daytime sleepiness [36]. The morbidities for anxiety and depression were also investigated by Wang et al., in patients with AIS and their parents, showing that only 7.3% had scored within the cutoff point of 10 that denoted probable major depressive disorder and 3.2% for severe anxiety. However, this cross-sectional study showed that the morbidities of parental depression and anxiety were 14.1%, significantly higher than those in the control group, proposing a causal relationship between parents’ mental disorders and adolescents’ general distress [34].
Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of the studies focusing on the association between AIS and depression. The depressive symptoms, when evaluated by Lin et al., showed an overall medium extent, which was significantly higher amongst female patients. The greater presence of such symptoms in AIS than in juvenile IS patients reflected the vulnerability of adolescence to mental health issues. The parameters positively associated with the severity of depression were the duration of brace treatment and the severity of the main curvature, as was already reported above within the studies examining the anxiety levels in braced patients [31]. Indeed, depression was proved to be more prevalent amongst scoliotic patients during a 5-year follow up; specifically, Chang et al. found higher hazard ratios of depressive disorders in patients with scoliosis and mostly amongst young adults and the middle-age [32]. In parallel, the risk of depression was also demonstrated by Baird et al., who found that 18% of AIS patients had scores worthy of further assessment for a potential diagnosis of depression [37]. Finally, the only study in the current literature that evaluated depression in young women with AIS using the Beck Depression Inventory marked a greater tendency for depression in female patients with mild and moderate deformities [33].
Regarding the matter of eating disorders, variable results have been published (Table 2). Alborghetti et al., using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-1 Disorders (SCID-1), showed a significantly higher prevalence of eating disorders in the scoliosis group when compared to an Italian female population (9.2% for anorexia nervosa, 7.7% for bulimia nervosa, and 5.3% for EDs). Interestingly, it was also highlighted that only girls with AN had a significantly higher degree of deviation of the vertebral column than adolescents without AN, F (1, 76) = 3.87, p < 0.05, indicating an association between the severity of scoliosis and the presence of AN [42]. Similarly, Smith et al. demonstrated the relationship between a diagnosis of AIS and anorexia nervosa, indicating that more than a half of the studied patients had BMI scores within the range considered to be anorexic [43]. On the other hand, Zaina et al., using the Eat-26 questionnaire, showed a low prevalence of eating disorders in AIS female patients. The significantly lower BMI remained present, but it was considered typical of scoliosis patients [44]. From a common perspective, Smith et al. showed that, notwithstanding the typically lower body mass index (BMI) of the studied group, the prevalence of eating disorders remained very low and similar to the general population [45].
Regarding personality pathology, results from the included studies suggested a pattern of neurotic personality traits (Table 2). These findings were demonstrated by the studies of Oh and Misterska et al. Both authors, using personality inventories, indicated higher scores in the neurotic scales amongst AIS patients compared to healthy controls [47,50]. Oh et al. [50], assessing males during the end of puberty obtained more accurate indices of personality disorders, using a conventional type of the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory test, which is one of the most widely used psychological assessment tools [50]. Similar scores were demonstrated by Misterska et al., reporting higher scores in the neurotic scale for the group treated surgically, whereas the AIS group under brace treatment had higher scores in the manic scale [47]. Matsunaga, on the basis of a clinical trial, confirmed the trend towards neuroticism, investigating the impact of brace therapy in the personality functioning and emotional responses of the studied adolescents. Although these traits seemed to be modifiable, it is important to notice that just one month after the start of therapy, the MPI assessment showed that 25% of the studied population encountering neurotic characteristics, compared to 2% before bracing [48]. Additionally, Matsunaga [48], along with the studies of Leak [46] and D’Agata et al. [49], have jointly unveiled a passive-introverted tendency among AIS patients, connected in all cases with brace-therapy and the challenging task of compliance.
Finally, two studies evaluated an association between psychosis and scoliosis (Table 2). The study of Oh et al. is twice referred to, but alternatively interpreted, since MMPI is identified, as well as symptoms associated with psychosis. Significantly higher scores in the psychopathy set including schizophrenia were reported among the 213 examinees (p = 0.010) [50]. Likewise, an increased risk of schizophrenia in patients with idiopathic scoliosis was detected by Malmqvist et al., over a median follow-up time of 9.5 years after the AIS diagnosis. The odds ratio for schizophrenia was significantly higher in patients with IS (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03–2.23), suggesting a possible link between these two conditions [51].

4. Discussion

The present literature review is an attempt to summarize all the available studies designed to investigate the possible relationship between AIS and mental health disorders. The existing studies are mainly cross-sectional, (15 of 30) and based on questionnaire assessments, with small consecutive samples. In terms of stress/anxiety evaluation, BSSQ was the most widely used tool; only one study in the current bibliography used a GAD inventory [34], and two used the state-trait anxiety inventory [23,35]. The overall stress in AIS population was low to moderate; a large-database epidemiological design showed a positive association between AIS and mental health conditions, especially anxiety [41]. Accordingly, an assessment of youthful scoliotics with BASC-2 inventory indicated similar results of clinically significant distress, regardless of the type of treatment prescribed [39]. An additional finding related to surgically-treated patients that needs further investigation pertains to the positive correlation between the pains these patients experience and preoperative anger, social problems, and attention problems [40].
The current studies and reviews underscore the need to attend to the psychological assessment of AIS patients, and provide much supportive evidence of the stressful and demanding experience of AIS. Physical complaints, lower self-esteem, higher depression scores, feelings of shame and body inferiority, and suicidal thoughts have been detected and raise concern [52,53]. Accordingly, in our review the association between AIS and depression was highlighted [32,33].
Body dissatisfaction, which has been bibliographically referred to as a major psychological effect of AIS [54], is also connected to eating disorders [55]. In the present review, an Italian study demonstrated a higher prevalence of EDs in scoliotic women [42]. The EAT-26 [44] and eating disorder examination questionnaire (EDE-Q) [45] evaluation, however, provided different results, showing a lower incidence of EDs in female scoliosis patients than in the general population. In any case, the scoliosis group weighed less and had lower BMI scores, and the possible eating pathology amongst this population has to be further investigated on the basis of larger sample sizes and clinical interviews.
As for personality pathology, previous findings have outlined that the threat to body image can lead some female patients to develop the defense mechanism of denial of their condition [55], with feelings of shame and difficulties in social integration [56]. In parallel, brace-treatment and the need for compliance may evoke neurotic behaviors, due to the insecurity and fear for the treatment result, and reverse the patterns of relating and interacting between family members [57]. Finally, a possible association between idiopathic scoliosis and schizophrenia was supported by two studies [50,51]. The high psychometric properties of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) for detecting psychopathic traits [50] and the large-database retrospective design have to be considered as strengths of these two designs. However, limitations exist concerning the study population, where only males from the military conscription examinations were included [50]. In any case, there is much space for further investigation to detect personality and psychotic disorders in cases of AIS; conducting large cohort studies enrolling women and men.
Future studies should be distinctly directed to the mental health of adolescents and adults with scoliosis, in terms of large-data based epidemiological studies and systematic reviews. In clinical research, adolescents should be addressed with specific screening tools along with psychosocial interviews, such as HEEADSSS, which allows the clinicians to comprehensively evaluate mental health in puberty and indicate risk and protective factors [58]. Randomized clinical trials should also be conducted, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of psychoeducational and psychotherapeutic interventions on adolescents with psychological distress, due to their deformity. Consequently, it turns out that psychological support should constitute an integral part of the overall therapeutic protocol of AIS, in order to address the growing need for psychosocial support of scoliotic patients and to reduce the burden of mental health issues in the future.
This review has some limitations; studies on overall quality of life and psychological well-being were not included. Moreover, especially in case of depression and psychosis, we could have included studies with an admixture of AIS cases with other types of scoliosis. However, no such data were clearly defined and, due to the high prevalence of AIS, we could assume that the largest part of the studied population was diagnosed with AIS with a continuation in adulthood.

5. Conclusions

The findings of the present review suggest associations between AIS, depression, anxiety, and neuroticism. Future research should be promptly redirected to a screening perspective for mental health in AIS subjects, with the design of multidisciplinary interventions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T. (Artemis Tsitsika) and T.N.S.; methodology, F.B., I.M. and A.T. (Athanasios Thirios); formal analysis, I.M., D.P. and A.T. (Athanasios Thirios); investigation, I.M., E.P. and A.T. (Athanasios Thirios); data curation, I.M., E.P. and A.T. (Athanasios Thirios); writing—original draft preparation, I.M., E.P. and T.N.S.; writing—review and editing, F.B., A.T. (Artemis Tsitsika) and T.N.S.; visualization, T.P. and D.P.; supervision, F.B., T.P., T.N.S. and A.T. (Artemis Tsitsika). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are included in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. SRS: Scoliosis Research Society. Available online: https://www.srs.org (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  2. González-Ruiz, J.M.; Pérez-Núñez, M.I.; García-Alfaro, M.D.; Bastir, M. Geometric morphometrics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A prospective observational study. Eur. Spine J. 2021, 30, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. James, J.I. Idiopathic scoliosis; the prognosis, diagnosis, and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age at onset. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1954, 36, 36–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Konieczny, M.R.; Senyurt, H.; Krauspe, R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Child. Orthop. 2013, 7, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Sanders, J.O.; Browne, R.H.; McConnell, S.J.; Margaf, S.A.; Cooney, T.E.; Finegold, D.N. Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2007, 89, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Negrini, S.; Aulisa, A.G.; Aulisa, L.; Circo, A.B.; de Mauroy, J.C.; Durmala, J.; Grivas, T.B.; Knott, P.; Kotwicki, T.; Maruyama, T.; et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 2012, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Negrini, S.; Grivas, T.B.; Kotwicki, T.; Maruyama, T.; Rigo, M.; Weiss, H.R. The members of the scientific society On Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients Consensus paper. Scoliosis 2005, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Ascani, E.; Bartolozzi, P.; Logroscino, C.A.; Marchetti, P.G.; Ponte, A.; Savini, R.; Travaglini, F.; Binazzi, R.; Di Silvestre, M. Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Spine 1986, 11, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Aebi, M. The adult scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 2005, 14, 925–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Kotwicki, T. Evaluation of scoliosis today: Examination, X-rays and beyond. Disabil. Rehabil. 2009, 30, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Tsiligiannis, T.; Grivas, T. Pulmonary function in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2012, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Weiss, H.R.; Negrini, S.; Rigo, M.; Kotwicki, T.; Hawes, M.C.; Grivas, T.B.; Maruyama, T.; Landauer, F. Indications for conservative treatment of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis 2006, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Aulisa, A.G.; Guzzanti, V.; Perisano, C.; Marzetti, E.; Specchia, A.; Galli, M.; Giordano, M.; Aulisa, L. Determination of quality of life in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis subjected to conservative treatment. Scoliosis 2010, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Schwieger, T.; Campo, S.; Weinstein, S.L.; Dolan, L.A.; Ashida, S.; Steuber, K.R. Body Image and Quality of Life and Brace Wear Adherence in Females with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2017, 37, e519–e523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Hwang, S.W.; Pahys, J.M.; Bastrom, T.P.; Lonner, B.S.; Newton, P.O.; Samdani, A.F. Lower SRS Mental Health Scores are Associated with Greater Preoperative Pain in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine 2019, 44, 1647–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Merikangas, K.R.; He, J.P.; Burstein, M.; Swanson, S.A.; Avenevoli, S.; Cui, L.; Benjet, C.; Georgiades, K.; Swendsen, J. Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in US Adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 2010, 49, 980–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Cosoff, S.J.; Hafner, R.J. The prevalence of comorbid anxiety in schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 1998, 32, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salazar, A.; Dueñas, M.; Ojeda, B.; Failde, I. Association of Painful Musculoskeletal Conditions and Migraine Headache with Mental and Sleep Disorders Among Adults with Disabilities. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2014, 11, E30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Micali, N.; Hagberg, K.W.; Petersen, I.; Treasure, J.L. The incidence of eating disorders in the UK in 2000–2009: Findings from the General Practice Research Database. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e002646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. De Clercq, B.; De Fruyt, F.; Leeuwen, K.V.; Mervielde, I. The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2006, 115, 639–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Shiner, R.; Caspi, A. Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development, and consequences. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 2003, 44, 2–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Glowacki, M.; Misterska, E.; Adamczyk, K.; Latuszewska, J. Prospective Assessment of Scoliosis-Related Anxiety and Impression of Trunk Deformity in Female Adolescents under Brace Treatment. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 2013, 25, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Lamontagne, L.L.; Hepworth, J.T.; Salisbury, M.H. Anxiety and postoperative pain in children who undergo major orthopedic surgery. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2001, 14, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Misterska, E.; Glowacki, M.; Harasymczuk, J. Brace and deformity-related stress level in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on the Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaires. Med. Sci. Monit. 2011, 17, CR83–CR90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Misterska, E.; Głowacki, M.; O’Byrne, A.I.; Latuszewska, J.; Lewandowski, J.; Ignyś, I.; Krauss, H.; Piątek, J. Differences in deformity and bracing-related stress between rural and urban area patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a Cheneau brace. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2011, 18, 410–414. [Google Scholar]
  26. Misterska, E.; Glowacki, M.; Latuszewska, J. Female patients’ and parents’ assessment of deformity- and brace-related stress in the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2012, 37, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Motlagh, F.R.; Pezham, H.; Babaee, T.; Saeedi, H.; Hedayati, Z.; Kamali, M. Persian adaptation of the Bad Sobernheim stress questionnaire for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 2020, 42, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Kotwicki, T.; Kinel, E.; Stryła, W.; Szulc, A. Estimation of the stress related to conservative scoliosis therapy: An analysis based on BSSQ questionnaires. Scoliosis 2007, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Leszczewska, J.; Czaprowski, D.; Pawłowska, P.; Kolwicz, A.; Kotwicki, T. Evaluation of the stress level of children with idiopathic scoliosis in relation to the method of treatment and parameters of the deformity. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 538409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Zimoń, M.; Matusik, E.; Kapustka, B.; Durmała, J.; Doroniewicz, I.; Wnuk, B. Conservative management strategies and stress level in children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Psychiatr. Pol. 2018, 52, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Lin, T.; Meng, Y.; Ji, Z.; Jiang, H.; Shao, W.; Gao, R.; Zhou, X. Extent of Depression in Juvenile and Adolescent Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis During Treatment with Braces. World Neurosurg. 2019, 126, e27–e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Chang, W.P.; Lin, Y.; Huang, H.L.; Lu, H.F.; Wang, S.T.; Chi, Y.C.; Hung, K.S.; Chen, H.Y. Scoliosis and the Subsequent Risk of Depression: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study in Taiwan. Spine 2016, 41, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Płaszewski, M.; Cieśliński, I.; Nowobilski, R.; Kotwicki, T.; Terech, J.; Furgał, M. Mental Health of Adults Treated in Adolescence with Scoliosis-Specific Exercise Program or Observed for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 932827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, H.; Li, T.; Yuan, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, J.; Qiu, G.; Shen, J. Mental health of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and their parents in China: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Duramaz, A.; Yılmaz, S.; Ziroğlu, N.; Duramaz, B.B.; Kara, T. The effect of deformity correction on psychiatric condition of the adolescent with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 2018, 27, 2233–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Wong, A.Y.L.; Samartzis, D.; Cheung, P.W.H.; Cheung, J.P.Y. How Common Is Back Pain and What Biopsychosocial Factors Are Associated with Back Pain in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2019, 477, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Baird, C.; Gardner, A. A report of the number of adolescents screened as warranting further investigation for depression and social anxiety in a pre-operative cohort with idiopathic scoliosis. Surgeon 2021, 19, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. O’Ryan, D. The role of cognitive factors in adolescents’ recovery from corrective surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. ProQuest Diss. Publ. 1999, 1, 1–140. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sanders, A.E.; Andras, L.M.; Iantorno, S.E.; Hamilton, A.; Choi, P.D.; Skaggs, D.L. Clinically Significant Psychological and Emotional Distress in 32% of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. Spine Deform. 2018, 6, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Rullander, A.C.; Lundström, M.; Lindkvist, M.; Hägglöf, B.; Lindh, V. Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: Correlations with postoperative pain. J. Clin. Nurs. 2016, 25, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Lee, S.B.; Chae, H.W.; Kwon, J.W.; Sung, S.; Lee, H.M.; Moon, S.H.; Lee, B.H. Is There an Association Between Psychiatric Disorders and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Large-database Study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2021, 479, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Alborghetti, A.; Scimeca, G.; Costanzo, G.; Boca, S. The Prevalence of Eating Disorders in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis. Eat. Disord. 2007, 16, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Smith, F.M.; Latchford, G.; Hall, R.M.; Millner, P.A.; Dickson, R.A. Indications of disordered eating behavior in adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg Br. 2002, 84, 392–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zaina, F.; Donzellia, S.; Lusinia, M.; Vismara, L.; Capodaglio, P.; Neric, L.; Negrini, S. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and eating disorders: Is there a relation? Results of a cross-sectional study. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2013, 34, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Smith, F.M.; Latchford, G.J.; Hall, R.M.; Dickson, R.A. Do Chronic Medical Conditions Increase the Risk of Eating Disorder? A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Eating Pathology in Adolescent Females with Scoliosis and Diabetes. J. Adolesc. Health 2008, 42, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Leak, S.A. Capacity for Empathy and Personality Functioning in Adolescent Girls with Idiopathic Scoliosis; ProQuest: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1992; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  47. Misterska, E.; Glowacki, M.; Harasymczuk, J. Personality characteristics of females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace or surgical treatment compared to healthy controls. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2010, 16, CR606–CR615. [Google Scholar]
  48. Matsunaga, S.; Hayashi, K.; Naruo, T.; Nozoe, S.; Komiya, S. Psychologic management of brace therapy for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005, 30, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. D’Agata, E.; Sánchez-Raya, J.; Bagó, J. Introversion, the prevalent trait of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: An observational study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Oh, C.H.; Shim, Y.S.; Yoon, S.H.; Park, H.C.; Park, C.O.; Lee, M.S. The Psychopathological Influence of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Korean Male: An Analysis of Multiphasic Personal Inventory Test Results. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2013, 53, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Malmqvist, M.; Tropp, H.; BLyth, J.; Wiréhn, A.B.; Castelein, R.M. Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis Run an Increased Risk of Schizophrenia. Spine Deform. 2019, 7, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Freidel, K.; Petermann, F.; Reichel, D.; Steiner, A.; Warschburger, P.; Weiss, H.R. Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002, 15, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Payne, W.K.; Ogilvie, J.W.; Resnick, M.D.; Kane, R.L.; Transfeldt, E.E.; Blum, R.W. Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine 1997, 22, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Sapountzi-Krepia, D.S.; Valavanis, J.; Panteleakis, G.P.; Zangana, D.T.; Vlachojiannis, P.C.; Sapkas, G.S. Perceptions of body image, happiness and satisfaction in adolescents wearing a Boston brace for scoliosis treatment. J. Adv. Nurs. 2001, 35, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Toro, J.; Gomez-Peresmitré, G.; Sentis, J.; Vallés, A.; Casulà, V.; Castro, J.; Pineda, G.; Leon, R.; Platas, S.; Rodriguez, R. Eating disorders and body image in Spanish and Mexican female adolescents. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2006, 41, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Nathan, S.W. Coping with Disability and the Surgical Experience. Clin. Pediatr. 1978, 17, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Sapountzi-Krepia, D.; Psychogiou, M.; Peterson, D.; Zafiri, V.; Iordanopoulou, E.; Michailidou, F.; Christodoulou, A. The experience of brace treatment in children/adolescents with scoliosis. Scoliosis 2006, 1, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. van Amstel, L.L.; Lafleur, D.L.; Blake, K. Raising our HEADSS: Adolescent psychosocial documentation in the emergency department. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2004, 6, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.