Next Article in Journal
Radiographic Features of COVID-19 in Children—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Ambulatory Sedation for Dental Procedures—Case of Cuenca, Ecuador
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/children9111619
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Circulatory Adipokines and Incretins in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study

by
Emilie Normand
1,2,
Anita Franco
1,3,
Nathalie Alos
4,
Stefan Parent
5,
Alain Moreau
3,6,7 and
Valérie Marcil
1,2,*
1
Research Center of the CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada
2
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
3
Viscogliosi Laboratory in Molecular Genetics and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Research Center of the CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada
4
Endocrine Service, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
5
Department of Surgery, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada
6
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
7
Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3A 1J4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2022, 9(11), 1619; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111619
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 20 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional malformation of the spine of unknown cause that develops between 10 and 18 years old and affects 2–3% of adolescents, mostly girls. It has been reported that girls with AIS have a taller stature, lower body mass index (BMI), and bone mineral density (BMD) than their peers, but the causes remain unexplained. Energy metabolism discrepancies, including alterations in adipokine and incretin circulatory levels, could influence these parameters and contribute to disease pathophysiology. This pilot study aims to compare the anthropometry, BMD, and metabolic profile of 19 AIS girls to 19 age-matched healthy controls. Collected data include participants’ fasting metabolic profile, anthropometry (measurements and DXA scan), nutritional intake, and physical activity level. AIS girls (14.8 ± 1.7 years, Cobb angle 27 ± 10°), compared to controls (14.8 ± 2.1 years), were leaner (BMI-for-age z-score ± SD: −0.59 ± 0.81 vs. 0.09 ± 1.11, p = 0.016; fat percentage: 24.4 ± 5.9 vs. 29.2 ± 7.2%, p = 0.036), had lower BMD (total body without head z-score ± SD: −0.6 ± 0.83 vs. 0.23 ± 0.98, p = 0.038; femoral neck z-score: −0.54 ± 1.20 vs. 0.59 ± 1.59, p = 0.043), but their height was similar. AIS girls had higher adiponectin levels [56 (9–287) vs. 32 (7–74) μg/mL, p = 0.005] and lower leptin/adiponectin ratio [0.042 (0.005–0.320) vs. 0.258 (0.024–1.053), p = 0.005]. AIS participants with a Cobb angle superior to 25° had higher resistin levels compared to controls [98.2 (12.8–287.2) vs. 32.1 (6.6–73.8), p = 0.0013]. This pilot study suggests that adipokines are implicated in AIS development and/or progression, but more work is needed to confirm their role in the disease.

1. Introduction

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is defined as a tridimensional spine deformation of unknown cause that develops between 10 and 18 years old. This type of scoliosis appears in approximately 2–3% of adolescents and is more prevalent among girls [1,2,3,4]. The Cobb angle is used to quantify the spine curvature, and scoliosis is classified as mild (10° to 20°), moderate (21° to 40°), severe (41° to 55°), or very severe (56° or more) [5]. Treatments are tailored according to the patient’s condition and depend primarily on the size, pattern, and severity of the curve, and on the potential of progression based on the child’s remaining growth. Patients are most at risk for curve progression during the growth spurt [6]. Those with curvature 10°–25° with a low risk of progression must be closely monitored by their physician but may never require treatment. Bracing is indicated for growing children with a curvature between 25° and 40° [7]. Surgery is considered for severe cases with a Cobb angle greater than 40° [8]. Untreated scoliosis can progress and cause physical deformities, psychological disturbances, back pain, and, in the worst cases, cardiopulmonary limitations [9,10]. Despite its unknown etiology, it is generally accepted that AIS pathogenesis is multifactorial and includes genetic, biomechanical, neuromuscular, and hormonal factors [11].
In recent years, scattered evidence has suggested that one’s metabolism and energy homeostasis is involved in AIS risk, severity, or progression [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Although interesting, this hypothesis has yet been poorly explored. It has been pinpointed that girls with AIS have different anthropometric features than their peers, such as taller stature, lower body mass index (BMI), and systemic low bone mineral density (BMD), but the causes of these discrepancies remain unexplained [19,20,21,22]. Energy metabolism, comprising energy expenditure, appetite regulation, and insulin sensitivity, could explain these differences. These phenomena are regulated by the interplay of several metabolic hormones, including adipokines and incretins, that are also known to influence bone homeostasis and growth [23], thus being potential candidates for AIS etiology.
Adipokines are hormones secreted by the adipose tissue and are well known for their role in glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and inflammation [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Growing evidence supports their implication in bone biology and remodeling [45,46,47,48] (Figure 1). Leptin is an inflammatory adipokine with an anorexigenic function, and some studies found lowered leptin levels in AIS and abnormalities in leptin bioavailability [12,14,16,49]. Adiponectin has the opposite effect of leptin as it is anti-inflammatory, promotes insulin sensitivity, and its serum levels are reduced in obesity [50,51]. Moreover, one study found that AIS patients with osteopenia have higher adiponectin levels compared to those with normal BMD and to healthy controls [52]. Other known adipokines have not yet been studied in AIS, such as resistin and visfatin, but they could also be of interest as they have similar metabolic functions as leptin and adiponectin [53,54,55,56]. While the role of adipokines in AIS pathophysiology is still unclear, available data support altered adipokine pathways and functions in AIS patients.
Incretins, peptides secreted by the gastrointestinal tract in response to nutrient intake, are also involved in these processes [57]. Incretins regulate glucose homeostasis through glucose-induced insulin secretion, enhancement of insulin sensitivity, and inhibition of glucagon release [58]. Accumulating evidence further supports their influence on bone metabolism [59,60]. To this day, only ghrelin has been investigated in AIS, and higher levels were found in AIS patients compared to controls [15,18,61]. However, many other incretins interact together to control energy metabolism, such as glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, GLP-2, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and peptide YY (PYY). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is also of interest as it plays a role in incretin inactivation. In parallel, a metabolomic analysis revealed differential lipid metabolites in AIS patients compared to controls, indicating a disruption in glycerophospholipid, glycerolipid and fatty acid metabolism [62].
We propose that metabolic factors, namely adipokines and incretins, are altered in AIS. We performed a pilot study to compare the anthropometry, body composition, BMD, and metabolic profile of AIS girls with age-matched healthy control girls. We also investigated in both groups the associations between anthropometric parameters, body composition, BMD, and metabolic parameters, including adipokines, incretins, and insulin metabolism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participant Recruitment

This is a cross-sectional pilot study comparing AIS girls and sex- and age-matched controls. Data on body anthropometry and composition, BMD, nutritional intake, physical activity, and biochemical markers were gathered and compared between the two groups. Inclusion criteria for AIS participants were: having a diagnosis of scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 10°) confirmed by the treating physician using clinical and standardized X-ray examination, being aged between 10 and 18 years old, being female, and not having received bracing and/or surgical treatment for scoliosis. Inclusion criteria for control participants were being aged between 10 and 18 years old and female. Exclusion criteria for AIS and control participants were: having a history of deformities, neuromuscular disease, metabolic disease, skeletal dysplasia, connective tissue abnormalities, mental retardation, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis), celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome, diarrhea ≥3 times a day occurring ≥3 months in the last year, blood in stool in most stools, recent steroid intake, being pregnant at the time of enrolment, antibiotic or probiotic intake, and/or acute inflammation within the past month. AIS girls (n = 21) were recruited at the scoliosis clinic of the Orthopedic Department at the CHU Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ) in Montreal, Canada. Risser stage, age at diagnosis, Cobb angle, localization, and the number of curves were recorded for each participant. If AIS patients had more than one curve, the major curve (the most severe Cobb angle) was used for analysis. Aged-matched healthy girls (n = 20) were recruited via advertisements. Participants were enrolled between January 2017 and December 2018 in a single visit at the time of data collection. The Institutional Review Board of CHUSJ approved the study (approval #2017-1145), and investigations were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants and parents.

2.2. Assessment of Anthropometric Parameters and Sexual Maturity

During each participant’s visit, weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. Weight was measured with a calibrated digital scale to the nearest 0.1 kg, while the participant was dressed in light clothes and no shoes. Height was recorded standing and sitting against a wall-mounted stadiometer, without shoes, to the nearest 0.1 cm. For AIS participants, adjusted height was calculated by correcting for trunk loss using Bjure’s formula (Log h = 0.011x + 0.177; where h is the loss of the trunk height caused by scoliosis, and x is the Cobb angle of the major curve) [63]. Waist circumference was measured in the horizontal plane of the superior border of the iliac crest with a tape measure to the nearest 0.1 cm. BMI (weight (kg)/height (m)2) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR, waist circumference (cm)/height (cm)) were calculated for each participant. Corrected height was used in the calculations for AIS participants. Corrected BMI-for-age and corrected height-for-age z-scores were determined with the Anthroplus software v.1.0.4 (Geneva: WHO, 2009, v.1.0.4, http://www.who.int/growthref/tools/en/, last accessed on 26 January 2019) based on the World Health Organization growth charts. To determine the pubertal stage, the Tanner scale (breast development and pubic hair growth) was self-reported by all participants with the help of drawings. The number of months since menarche was also recorded.

2.3. Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density

Body composition and BMD were assessed with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan using a Lunar Prodigy densitometer (General Electric Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) and performed by trained technicians. Areal bone mineral density (g/cm2) was measured at three sites: the lumbar spine, the femoral neck, and the total body-less-head, according to The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recommendations in pediatrics [64]. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted BMD z-scores were calculated with a reference population from the United States (NHANES/Lunar combined; v112) and used for analyses. The DXA scan also provided total body fat percentage (%), lean mass (g), and fat mass (g). The fat mass index and lean mass index were calculated by dividing both by the square of the height (corrected height for AIS participants) [65]. Those indexes normalize the data as height is a confounding factor for body composition parameters.

2.4. Assessment of Dietary Intakes

Dietary intakes were evaluated using validated interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) specific to our population [66]. Measuring cups were used during the interview to estimate portion size. Participants were asked to indicate the consumption frequency of each food item in the last month on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. Computation of nutrient intakes derived from the FFQs was performed using a validated in-house-built nutrient calculation tool [66]. Intake of vitamin and mineral supplements was also assessed and included in the analysis. Average daily intakes of energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients were calculated for each participant.

2.5. Assessment of Physical Activity

Physical activity was assessed using the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS)—Cycle 4 questionnaires, namely the Physical and Sedentary Activity Questionnaires for adolescents (12 to 18 years old) and children (<12 years old). These interviewer-administrated questionnaires record how many hours the participant engaged in moderate to intense physical activities at school and at home in the last seven days and in a normal week. Clarifications were asked about the type, frequency, and intensity of exercises. Average moderate to intense physical activity per day was calculated. Questions on the number of hours of screen time during a typical week over the last three months were also asked to determine participants’ screen time (hrs/day), which included time spent watching television, computer, tablet, and/or phone.

2.6. Assessment of Estimated Energy Requirement and Energy Balance

Estimated energy requirement (EER) is the average dietary energy intake predicted to maintain energy balance in healthy, normal-weight individuals of a defined age, sex, weight, height, and level of physical activity consistent with good health [67]. Based on the physical activity questionnaire, participants were classified according to their physical activity coefficients and characterized as sedentary, low active, active, and very active [67]. Energy balance was calculated as energy intake divided by the EER in percentage (energy intake/EER × 100).

2.7. Biochemical Determinations

To study participants’ metabolic profile, blood samples were drawn in the morning after a 12-h fasting period. Inhibitors [4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF; Sigma Aldrich, St-Louis, MO, USA), aprotinin (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, USA) and DPP-4 inhibitor (Millipore, St-Charles, MO, USA) were added to EDTA-treated collection tubes before blood was drawn to maintain the integrity of metabolic molecules. Collected blood was kept on ice until centrifugation. Plasma was separated and stored at −80 °C until analysis.
Total cholesterol, HDL-C, and TG were determined enzymatically with a Synchron LX20 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The Friedewald equation was used to calculate LDL-C. ApoB was measured by nephelometry (Array Protein System; Beckman) and ApoA1 by an automated analyzer (Cobas Integra 400, Roche Diagnostics). Glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase method, and plasma insulin concentrations were determined using the ultrasensitive Access immunoassay system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
The homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using the formula: insulin (mIU/L) × glucose (mmol/L)/22.5. The quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) was calculated as an indicator of insulin sensitivity with the formula: 1/(log(fasting insulin) + log(fasting glucose).
Plasma adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, resistin), incretins (active ghrelin and GIP), and c-peptide were analyzed with the Milliplex custom Human Metabolic Hormone (HMHEMAG-34K) and the Human Adipokine 1 Magnetic Bead Panel (HADK1MAG-61K)-Metabolic Multiplex Assay (Millipore, St-Charles, MO, USA). Eve Technologies Corporation (Calgary, AB, Canada) performed the experiments. ELISA kits were used to measure levels of total (EZGLP1T-36K) and active GLP-1 (EGLP-35K), GLP-2 (E2GLP2-37K), ghrelin total (EZGRT-89K), and PYY (EZHPYYT66K) (Millipore, St-Charles, MO, USA), as well as visfatin (EH482RB, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), uncarboxylated (446707, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and total osteocalcin (43-OSNHU-E01, Alpco, Salem, NH, USA). DPP-4 activity was measured using an activity assay kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (BML-AK498, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA).

Statistical Analyses

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normality of distribution. Normally distributed data were reported as mean ± SD, and non-normally distributed data were presented as median (range). Paired for age, Student t-tests or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were used to compare control and AIS groups. AIS patients were categorized according to the severity of the curve with the median Cobb angle as the cut-off value (Cobb angle <25° or ≥25°). Levels of adipokines and incretins were compared with Student t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests. Associations between adipokines, incretins, or insulin metabolism markers (independent variables) and BMI-for-age, fat percentage, or whole-body BMD were assessed using multiple linear regression analysis. Analyses were performed without covariables (crude models) and with covariables, such as age, fat mass, height-for-age, energy intake, calcium intake, vitamin D intake, and physical activity, when appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0.1) and IBM-SPSS software (version 25).

3. Results

We recruited 20 AIS and 22 healthy control participants (Figure 2). Three girls in the healthy control group were excluded from our analysis: two were diagnosed with dyslipidemia after biochemical assessment, and one was diagnosed with AIS following a DXA scan and was further classified in the AIS group. With 21 AIS and 19 control participants, 19 age-matched pairs were included in the paired analyses. A total of 17 control participants underwent the DXA scan, resulting in 17 age-matched pairs for body composition and BMD analysis. The clinical and anthropometric characteristics of AIS and control participants are detailed in Table 1. Mean age and sexual maturity parameters were similar between groups. AIS participants had a mean Cobb angle of 27.1 ± 10.5° (range: 13–46°) that represents a curve of moderate severity and a mean age at diagnosis of 13.0 ± 1.7 years. Comparing anthropometric features revealed that AIS girls were leaner than controls, as reflected by lower BMI, BMI-for-age z-score, and waist-to-height ratio, but they were not taller.
Participants underwent a full-body DXA scan to precisely determine their BMD and body composition. Table 2 shows that, compared to controls, girls with AIS had lower total body less head and lower femoral neck BMD z-score, but no statistically significant difference was observed at the lumbar spine site. Also, AIS girls had lower total body fat percentage, fat mass, and fat mass index than controls. Lean mass and lean mass index were similar between groups.
Dietary intakes and physical activity levels in both groups are shown in Table 3. The mean caloric intake was similar between groups. There was a trend for superior energy balance in the AIS group, theoretically indicating that they consume more calories than they expend. However, girls with AIS spent significantly less time per week doing moderate-to-intense physical activities than controls and had greater daily screen time.
Fasting glucose and lipid profile were also compared between the two groups (Table 4). Fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and QUICKI were not different between groups, and neither were TG, total cholesterol, HDL-C, and ApoA1 levels. There was a tendency for higher LDL-C and ApoB in AIS participants, but the differences were not statistically significant. The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, a cardiovascular risk marker, was also similar between the AIS and control groups.
Next, we assessed fasting levels of adipokines and incretins (Table 5). Mean levels of circulating visfatin were similar between groups. Leptin and adiponectin were found to be higher in AIS participants compared to controls. This translated into a lower leptin/adiponectin ratio in AIS participants. Also, mean levels of resistin were higher in the AIS group but without reaching statistical significance. After stratification of the AIS group according to scoliosis severity, we found higher levels of adiponectin and resistin in AIS participants with a Cobb angle greater than 25° compared to controls, but no difference in leptin and visfatin levels (Figure 3). Mean levels of fasting incretins (GLP-1 total and active, GLP-2, GIP, ghrelin total and active, and PYY) were not different between groups (Table 5). There was also no difference observed for DPP-4 activity, total, and undercarboxylated osteocalcin between AIS and control groups.
Analyzing incretin levels according to Cobb angle severity did not reveal differences between groups (Supplementary Figure S1). Similarly, no difference was found when anthropometry, body composition, and BMD were sub-analyzed according to the Cobb angle (Supplementary Table S1).
The associations between energy metabolism markers and anthropometry, body composition, and BMD are shown in Supplementary Tables S2–S4. Adjusted models revealed that leptin was positively associated with BMI-for-age and fat percentage in both AIS and control groups. Similar associations for adiponectin, resistin, and visfatin were not found. Leptin was inversely associated with BMD in the control group but not in AIS. Concerning incretins, total and active ghrelin were inversely associated with BMI-for-age in the AIS group. Also, GIP was inversely associated with whole-body BMD only in AIS participants. In the control group only, total OCN and QUICKI were inversely associated, and HOMA-IR was positively associated with BMI-for-age. Total OCN was inversely associated with fat percentage in the control group. Finally, there was no association between insulin metabolism markers and whole-body BMD.

4. Discussion

In this pilot study, we found that AIS girls were leaner but not taller, and had lower total body-less-head and femoral neck BMD compared to age- and sex-matched controls. We also found differences in circulatory levels of adipokines between groups, but fasting incretins were similar. There were associations between insulin metabolism markers (HOMA-IR, QUIKI, and total OCN) and anthropometry in controls but not in the AIS group. These results align with our hypothesis that girls with AIS have a disturbed energy metabolism.
Leptin, an inflammatory adipokine with an anorexigenic function, has been studied in AIS, but its role remains controversial. A meta-analysis of six comparative studies concluded that serum leptin levels between AIS patients and controls were not different [68], while another meta-analysis of seven studies found lower levels in AIS participants compared to controls [17]. The small sample sizes, lack of information on participants’ fasting state, and the different study designs and methods of leptin analysis could explain the contradictory results.
Circulating leptin levels are positively associated with fat mass [69]. A meta-analysis of 3747 participants found that the mean BMI of AIS patients was significantly lower than controls [21]. BMI itself does not accurately reflect adiposity and body composition, especially in children and adolescents [70], but the DXA scan is considered the gold standard for measuring body composition. In our study, considering the observed lower BMI, WHtR, fat mass, and fat percentage in AIS participants, the observed (but not statistically significant) lower leptin levels were expected as they are related to participants’ adiposity. Similarly, the lower adiposity of AIS participants could explain the observed higher adiponectin levels. However, this does not appear to be the case in our study, as no association was found between adiponectin, BMI-for-age, and fat percentage. Corroborating our findings, Zhang et al. found higher plasma adiponectin levels in AIS patients than in controls [52]. However, they also found higher adiponectin levels in AIS patients with osteopenia compared to those with normal bone mass, while no such association was found in our pilot study. In parallel, adiponectin levels have been compared between a group of highly active and less active adolescents [71]. It was shown that girls with higher vigorous physical activity levels had greater adiponectin levels, independently of their weight status [71]. In our study, although girls with AIS spent less time performing moderate to intense physical activity, their adiponectin levels were superior to those of controls. This could indicate disturbances in adipokine production in the AIS group.
To our knowledge, this is the first report examining resistin and visfatin levels in AIS patients. Resistin is associated with obesity and cardiometabolic diseases [72], which is why it was surprising to observe higher levels in the AIS patients with more severe curvatures since they were leaner than controls. Higher resistin levels were also observed in a group of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared to healthy controls [73], supporting that resistin is associated with insulin metabolism discrepancies. The mechanisms and receptors by which resistin exerts its actions are still unknown. It has been proposed that G-protein-coupled receptors are involved in lymphocyte chemotaxis induced by resistin [74]. One can speculate that resistin’s actions on energy and bone metabolism could involve the G-protein-coupled receptor pathway. A signaling dysfunction of G inhibitory proteins was reported in AIS patients [75], where a hypo-functionality of inhibitory Gαi subunits and an enhancement of Gs signaling were correlated with the risk of disease progression. This dysfunction could potentially explain why resistin levels were higher in the AIS group and correlated with disease severity. Furthermore, visfatin is highly present in visceral fat [48], and its circulatory levels were elevated in childhood obesity [76]. Here, no difference in visfatin levels was found between groups.
In addition to adipokines, energy homeostasis is maintained by the actions of incretins. In AIS, ghrelin is the only adipokine studied thus far. It was reported that AIS girls have higher levels of fasting total ghrelin compared to controls [15]. Total ghrelin levels were also higher in AIS patients with progressive curves than stable ones [18]. Also, compared to controls, plasma ghrelin levels were higher in AIS patients with osteopenia [61]. While the active acylated form of ghrelin is known for its metabolic actions and appetite regulation [77], only total ghrelin has been assessed in AIS. Here, no difference between groups was found for either acylated or total ghrelin or any other measured incretins, namely GIP, total and active GLP-1, GLP-2, and PYY. Since incretins are secreted post-prandially, it is possible that the participants’ fasting state prevented the detection of differences between groups. Future studies investigating incretin levels in AIS following a standardized meal could shed some light on energy metabolism regulation in the disease.
We found no difference between groups in the levels of fasting glucose and insulin, as well as in indicators of insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity. However, since associations between HOMA-IR, QUIKI, and BMI-for-age were found only in the control group, one could speculate that AIS patients do not respond to insulin in the same manner as controls. Further studies examining post-prandial insulin response in AIS are needed to validate this hypothesis. Moreover, examining participants’ lipid profiles exposed a tendency for higher LDL-C and ApoB in the AIS group, though lipid levels remained within the normal range. Larger studies are needed to confirm if discrepancies in circulating lipids are present in AIS.
Insulin metabolism is known to influence bone remodeling [78]. In osteoblasts, the activation of the insulin receptor stimulates the expression of OCN, which is also implicated in glucose homeostasis [78,79]. Undercarboxylated OCN is released in circulation, where it stimulates pancreatic β-cell proliferation and increases insulin production, insulin sensitivity, and energy expenditure from peripheral organs [80,81,82]. Here, we found no difference between groups in circulating levels of either form of OCN. However, total OCN was inversely associated with BMI-for-age and fat percentage in the control group but not in AIS. A recent meta-analysis reported that, in humans, higher total OCN levels are inversely correlated with lower BMI and fat percentage. Kulis et al. studied OCN levels in premenarcheal and post-menarcheal AIS and control girls. In contrast to our study, they found higher OCN levels in AIS compared to controls for both menstrual statuses [83]. Matusik et al. studied osteocalcin related to AIS severity [13] and found that osteocalcin was inversely associated with the severity of the scoliotic curve. This association was not found in our pilot study.
In the literature, lower BMD of AIS patients compared to controls has been extensively reported, corroborating our findings [20,22,84,85,86]. Adiponectin and ghrelin could impact BMD in AIS through their actions on the nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio [61]. In control osteoblasts, treatment with ghrelin increased OPG and decreased RANKL expression in a concentration-dependent manner, which is in favor of decreasing bone resorption. In contrast, there was no significant variation in OPG and RANKL expression in AIS osteoblasts. Treatment of osteoblasts with adiponectin had the opposite effect of ghrelin and rather promoted a higher RANKL/OPG ratio, which leads to an increase in bone resorption [46,52]. Higher adiponectin levels in AIS could reflect a higher RANKL/OPG ratio in osteoblasts, which could impact BMD.
Important factors to consider when studying energy metabolism, anthropometry, and BMD are dietary intake and level of physical activity. As previously reviewed, few studies have investigated nutrition in AIS patients [87]. Furthermore, the literature on physical activity is inconsistent, as some studies found that AIS girls were less active than controls [20,88,89], while others did not observe any differences between groups [16,90,91]. In our pilot study, there was no difference in mean caloric intake between groups. However, AIS girls did less moderate-to-intense physical activity than controls, combined with more hours of screen time. It is known that weight-bearing exercises are important for optimal BMD. In our study, participants in the AIS group did fewer weight-bearing exercises than the controls, which may contribute to their lower BMD. Importantly, both groups met their energy need requirements. Their similar caloric intake and lower physical activity level, BMI, and fat percentage of AIS participants support the hypothesis of a higher metabolism in AIS.
Our pilot study has several strengths and limitations. A major strength is that the study protocol was specifically designed to study metabolic parameters, including a homogenous fasting period, the use of inhibitors, and the collection of dietary and physical activity data. Additional strengths are the use of the DXA scan to assess body composition, the paired study design, and the inclusion of only newly diagnosed patients, thus excluding treatment as a confounding factor. Study limitations include the small sample size, which does not allow for extensive multivariate analysis. Given that this was a pilot and exploratory study, p-values were not corrected for multiple testing. While the methods we utilized to measure adipokines and incretins have been used in numerous recent studies [92,93,94,95,96,97], mass spectrometry would provide higher specificity [98,99,100]. Other limits were the study restriction of only females with mild to moderate curve severity and the lack of post-prandial assessments. Future and larger longitudinal studies, including female and male participants, as well as mild and severe cases, are needed to study energy metabolism in AIS thoroughly.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this pilot study suggests a possible role for adipokines in AIS anthropometric and BMD discrepancies, which could impact disease development and/or progression. Further well-designed larger studies are needed to validate our findings. This research is a first step toward a better understanding of energy metabolism in AIS.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/children9111619/s1. Figure S1: Incretin and osteocalcin levels in control and AIS participants; Table S1: Anthropometry, body composition, BMD, and biochemical profile between controls and AIS participants based on curve severity; Table S2: Associations between BMI-for-age z-score and metabolic parameters; Table S3: Associations between fat percentage and metabolic parameters; Table S4: Associations between total body BMD z-score and metabolic parameters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A., S.P., A.M. and V.M.; methodology, E.N. and V.M.; formal analysis, E.N., A.F. and V.M.; investigation, E.N. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.N. and V.M.; writing—review and editing, E.N., A.F., N.A., S.P., A.M. and V.M.; visualization, E.N.; supervision, V.M.; project administration, E.N. and A.F.; funding acquisition, V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a research grant from the Fondation Yves Cotrel-Institut de France. E.N. holds a doctoral fellowship from the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQ-S), and V.M. holds a FRQ-S Junior II career award.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Review Board of the Sainte-Justine UHC approved the study (protocol #2017-1145; 6 June 2016), and investigations were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Morais, T.; Bernier, M.; Turcotte, F. Age- and sex-specific prevalence of scoliosis and the value of school screening programs. Am. J. Public Health 1985, 75, 1377–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Du, Q.; Zhou, X.; Negrini, S.; Chen, N.; Yang, X.; Liang, J.; Sun, K. Scoliosis epidemiology is not similar all over the world: A study from a scoliosis school screening on Chongming Island (China). BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yawn, B.P.; Yawn, R.A.; Hodge, D.; Kurland, M.; Shaughnessy, W.J.; Ilstrup, D.; Jacobsen, S.J. A population-based study of school scoliosis screening. JAMA 1999, 282, 1427–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hresko, M.T. Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Negrini, S.; Donzelli, S.; Aulisa, A.G.; Czaprowski, D.; Schreiber, S.; de Mauroy, J.C.; Diers, H.; Grivas, T.B.; Knott, P.; Kotwicki, T.; et al. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Canavese, F. Idiopathic scoliosis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kaelin, A.J. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications for bracing and conservative treatments. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruf, M.; Drumm, J.; Jeszenszky, D. Anterior instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asher, M.A.; Burton, D.C. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 2006, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sanders, A.E.; Andras, L.M.; Iantorno, S.E.; Hamilton, A.; Choi, P.D.; Skaggs, D.L. Clinically Significant Psychological and Emotional Distress in 32% of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. Spine Deform. 2018, 6, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fadzan, M.; Bettany-Saltikov, J. Etiological Theories of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Past and Present. Open Orthop. J. 2017, 11, 1466–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Liu, Z.; Tam, E.M.; Sun, G.Q.; Lam, T.P.; Zhu, Z.Z.; Sun, X.; Lee, K.M.; Ng, T.B.; Qiu, Y.; Cheng, J.C.; et al. Abnormal leptin bioavailability in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An important new finding. Spine 2012, 37, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Matusik, E.; Durmala, J.; Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, M.; Chudek, J.; Matusik, P. Association between Bone Turnover Markers, Leptin, and Nutritional Status in Girls with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Nutrients 2020, 12, 2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Qiu, Y.; Sun, X.; Qiu, X.; Li, W.; Zhu, Z.; Zhu, F.; Wang, B.; Yu, Y.; Qian, B. Decreased circulating leptin level and its association with body and bone mass in girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007, 32, 2703–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sales de Gauzy, J.; Gennero, I.; Delrous, O.; Salles, J.P.; Lepage, B.; Accadbled, F. Fasting total ghrelin levels are increased in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2015, 10, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tam, E.M.; Liu, Z.; Lam, T.P.; Ting, T.; Cheung, G.; Ng, B.K.; Lee, S.K.; Qiu, Y.; Cheng, J.C. Lower Muscle Mass and Body Fat in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Are Associated With Abnormal Leptin Bioavailability. Spine 2016, 41, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Hu, W.; Hu, F.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X. Disordered leptin and ghrelin bioactivity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2020, 15, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, H.G.; Zhang, H.Q.; Zhou, Z.H.; Wang, Y.J. High Ghrelin Level Predicts the Curve Progression of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Girls. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9784083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barrios, C.; Cortés, S.; Pérez-Encinas, C.; Escrivá, M.D.; Benet, I.; Burgos, J.; Hevia, E.; Pizá, G.; Domenech, P. Anthropometry and body composition profile of girls with nonsurgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2011, 36, 1470–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheung, C.S.K.; Lee, W.T.K.; Tse, Y.K.; Lee, K.M.; Guo, X.; Qin, L.; Cheng, J.C.Y. Generalized osteopenia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-association with abnormal pubertal growth, bone turnover, and calcium intake? Spine 2006, 31, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tarrant, R.C.; Queally, J.M.; Moore, D.P.; Kiely, P.J. Prevalence and impact of low body mass index on outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 1463–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Diarbakerli, E.; Savvides, P.; Wihlborg, A.; Abbott, A.; Bergström, I.; Gerdhem, P. Bone health in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Joint J. 2020, 102-B, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khor, E.C.; Wee, N.K.; Baldock, P.A. Influence of hormonal appetite and energy regulators on bone. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2013, 11, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Adeghate, E. Visfatin: Structure, function and relation to diabetes mellitus and other dysfunctions. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 1851–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Berti, L.; Gammeltoft, S. Leptin stimulates glucose uptake in C2C12 muscle cells by activation of ERK2. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1999, 157, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Borst, S.E.; Conover, C.F.; Bagby, G.J. Association of resistin with visceral fat and muscle insulin resistance. Cytokine 2005, 32, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brown, J.E.; Onyango, D.J.; Dunmore, S.J. Resistin down-regulates insulin receptor expression, and modulates cell viability in rodent pancreatic beta-cells. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 3273–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, J.E.; Onyango, D.J.; Ramanjaneya, M.; Conner, A.C.; Patel, S.T.; Dunmore, S.J.; Randeva, H.S. Visfatin regulates insulin secretion, insulin receptor signalling and mRNA expression of diabetes-related genes in mouse pancreatic beta-cells. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 44, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cheng, Q.; Dong, W.; Qian, L.; Wu, J.; Peng, Y. Visfatin inhibits apoptosis of pancreatic β-cell line, MIN6, via the mitogen-activated protein kinase/phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 47, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Emilsson, V.; Liu, Y.L.; Cawthorne, M.A.; Morton, N.M.; Davenport, M. Expression of the functional leptin receptor mRNA in pancreatic islets and direct inhibitory action of leptin on insulin secretion. Diabetes 1997, 46, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, C.L.; Zhao, D.Y.; Qiu, J.; Zhang, C.M.; Ji, C.B.; Chen, X.H.; Liu, F.; Guo, X.R. Resistin induces rat insulinoma cell RINm5F apoptosis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 36, 1703–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mantzoros, C.S.; Magkos, F.; Brinkoetter, M.; Sienkiewicz, E.; Dardeno, T.A.; Kim, S.Y.; Hamnvik, O.P.; Koniaris, A. Leptin in human physiology and pathophysiology. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 301, E567–E584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Minokoshi, Y.; Kim, Y.B.; Peroni, O.D.; Fryer, L.G.; Müller, C.; Carling, D.; Kahn, B.B. Leptin stimulates fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature 2002, 415, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Moon, B.; Kwan, J.J.; Duddy, N.; Sweeney, G.; Begum, N. Resistin inhibits glucose uptake in L6 cells independently of changes in insulin signaling and GLUT4 translocation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 285, E106–E115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moschen, A.R.; Kaser, A.; Enrich, B.; Mosheimer, B.; Theurl, M.; Niederegger, H.; Tilg, H. Visfatin, an adipocytokine with proinflammatory and immunomodulating properties. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 1748–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ohashi, K.; Ouchi, N.; Matsuzawa, Y. Anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic properties of adiponectin. Biochimie 2012, 94, 2137–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ohashi, K.; Parker, J.L.; Ouchi, N.; Higuchi, A.; Vita, J.A.; Gokce, N.; Pedersen, A.A.; Kalthoff, C.; Tullin, S.; Sams, A.; et al. Adiponectin promotes macrophage polarization toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 6153–6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Qi, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Hileman, S.M.; Patel, H.R.; Berg, A.H.; Pajvani, U.B.; Scherer, P.E.; Ahima, R.S. Adiponectin acts in the brain to decrease body weight. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reilly, M.P.; Lehrke, M.; Wolfe, M.L.; Rohatgi, A.; Lazar, M.A.; Rader, D.J. Resistin is an inflammatory marker of atherosclerosis in humans. Circulation 2005, 111, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vázquez, M.J.; González, C.R.; Varela, L.; Lage, R.; Tovar, S.; Sangiao-Alvarellos, S.; Williams, L.M.; Vidal-Puig, A.; Nogueiras, R.; López, M.; et al. Central resistin regulates hypothalamic and peripheral lipid metabolism in a nutritional-dependent fashion. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 4534–4543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wijesekara, N.; Krishnamurthy, M.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Suhail, A.; Sweeney, G.; Wheeler, M.B. Adiponectin-induced ERK and Akt phosphorylation protects against pancreatic beta cell apoptosis and increases insulin gene expression and secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 33623–33631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Yamauchi, T.; Kamon, J.; Minokoshi, Y.; Ito, Y.; Waki, H.; Uchida, S.; Yamashita, S.; Noda, M.; Kita, S.; Ueki, K.; et al. Adiponectin stimulates glucose utilization and fatty-acid oxidation by activating AMP-activated protein kinase. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 1288–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, Y.; Xiao, M.; Mao, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, S.; Gu, Y.; Wang, R.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Irwin, D.M.; et al. Resistin and insulin resistance in hepatocytes: Resistin disturbs glycogen metabolism at the protein level. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2009, 63, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, A.Z.; Shinohara, M.M.; Huang, D.; Shimizu, M.; Eldar-Finkelman, H.; Krebs, E.G.; Beavo, J.A.; Bornfeldt, K.E. Leptin induces insulin-like signaling that antagonizes cAMP elevation by glucagon in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 11348–11354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gordeladze, J.O.; Drevon, C.A.; Syversen, U.; Reseland, J.E. Leptin stimulates human osteoblastic cell proliferation, de novo collagen synthesis, and mineralization: Impact on differentiation markers, apoptosis, and osteoclastic signaling. J. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 85, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Luo, X.H.; Guo, L.J.; Xie, H.; Yuan, L.Q.; Wu, X.P.; Zhou, H.D.; Liao, E.Y. Adiponectin stimulates RANKL and inhibits OPG expression in human osteoblasts through the MAPK signaling pathway. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21, 1648–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thommesen, L.; Stunes, A.K.; Monjo, M.; Grøsvik, K.; Tamburstuen, M.V.; Kjøbli, E.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Reseland, J.E.; Syversen, U. Expression and regulation of resistin in osteoblasts and osteoclasts indicate a role in bone metabolism. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006, 99, 824–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xie, H.; Tang, S.Y.; Luo, X.H.; Huang, J.; Cui, R.R.; Yuan, L.Q.; Zhou, H.D.; Wu, X.P.; Liao, E.Y. Insulin-like effects of visfatin on human osteoblasts. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2007, 80, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tam, E.M.; Yu, F.W.; Hung, V.W.; Liu, Z.; Liu, K.L.; Ng, B.K.; Lee, S.K.; Qiu, Y.; Cheng, J.C.; Lam, T.P. Are volumetric bone mineral density and bone micro-architecture associated with leptin and soluble leptin receptor levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?--A case-control study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yamauchi, T.; Kamon, J.; Waki, H.; Terauchi, Y.; Kubota, N.; Hara, K.; Mori, Y.; Ide, T.; Murakami, K.; Tsuboyama-Kasaoka, N.; et al. The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arita, Y.; Kihara, S.; Ouchi, N.; Takahashi, M.; Maeda, K.; Miyagawa, J.; Hotta, K.; Shimomura, I.; Nakamura, T.; Miyaoka, K.; et al. Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 257, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, H.Q.; Wang, L.J.; Liu, S.H.; Li, J.; Xiao, L.G.; Yang, G.T. Adiponectin regulates bone mass in AIS osteopenia via RANKL/OPG and IL6 pathway. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Rajala, M.W.; Qi, Y.; Patel, H.R.; Takahashi, N.; Banerjee, R.; Pajvani, U.B.; Sinha, M.K.; Gingerich, R.L.; Scherer, P.E.; Ahima, R.S. Regulation of resistin expression and circulating levels in obesity, diabetes, and fasting. Diabetes 2004, 53, 1671–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Benomar, Y.; Taouis, M. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Obesity-Induced Hypothalamic Inflammation and Insulin Resistance: Pivotal Role of Resistin/TLR4 Pathways. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Nourbakhsh, M.; Nourbakhsh, M.; Gholinejad, Z.; Razzaghy-Azar, M. Visfatin in obese children and adolescents and its association with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2015, 75, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Otero, M.; Lago, R.; Gomez, R.; Lago, F.; Dieguez, C.; Gómez-Reino, J.J.; Gualillo, O. Changes in plasma levels of fat-derived hormones adiponectin, leptin, resistin and visfatin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006, 65, 1198–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Murphy, K.G.; Bloom, S.R. Gut hormones and the regulation of energy homeostasis. Nature 2006, 444, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Holst, J.J.; Deacon, C.F.; Vilsboll, T.; Krarup, T.; Madsbad, S. Glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose homeostasis and diabetes. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mabilleau, G.; Mieczkowska, A.; Irwin, N.; Flatt, P.R.; Chappard, D. Optimal bone mechanical and material properties require a functional glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 219, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Clowes, J.A.; Khosla, S.; Eastell, R. Potential role of pancreatic and enteric hormones in regulating bone turnover. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005, 20, 1497–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xiao, L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, G.; Wang, L.; Liang, Z. Dysregulation of the ghrelin/RANKL/OPG pathway in bone mass is related to AIS osteopenia. Bone 2020, 134, 115291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sun, Z.J.; Jia, H.M.; Qiu, G.X.; Zhou, C.; Guo, S.; Zhang, J.G.; Shen, J.X.; Zhao, Y.; Zou, Z.M. Identification of candidate diagnostic biomarkers for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using UPLC/QTOF-MS analysis: A first report of lipid metabolism profiles. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Bjure, J.; Grimby, G.; Nachemson, A. Correction of body height in predicting spirometric values in scoliotic patients. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1968, 21, 191–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. ISCD. Skeletal Health Assessment in Children from Infancy to Adolescence. Available online: https://iscd.org/learn/official-positions/pediatric-positions/ (accessed on 30 August 2021).
  65. VanItallie, T.B.; Yang, M.U.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Funk, R.C.; Boileau, R.A. Height-normalized indices of the body’s fat-free mass and fat mass: Potentially useful indicators of nutritional status. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990, 52, 953–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Goulet, J.; Nadeau, G.; Lapointe, A.; Lamarche, B.; Lemieux, S. Validity and reproducibility of an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire for healthy French-Canadian men and women. Nutr. J. 2004, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Government of Canada. Dietary Reference Intakes Tables. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/healthy-eating/dietary-reference-intakes/tables.html (accessed on 6 April 2021).
  68. Bae, S.H.; Goh, T.S.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, J.S. Leptin in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—A meta-analysis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 71, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Maffei, M.; Halaas, J.; Ravussin, E.; Pratley, R.E.; Lee, G.H.; Zhang, Y.; Fei, H.; Kim, S.; Lallone, R.; Ranganathan, S.; et al. Leptin levels in human and rodent: Measurement of plasma leptin and ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 1155–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Demerath, E.W.; Schubert, C.M.; Maynard, L.M.; Sun, S.S.; Chumlea, W.C.; Pickoff, A.; Czerwinski, S.A.; Towne, B.; Siervogel, R.M. Do changes in body mass index percentile reflect changes in body composition in children? Data from the Fels Longitudinal Study. Pediatrics 2006, 117, e487–e495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Rubin, D.A.; McMurray, R.G.; Harrell, J.S.; Thorpe, D.E.; Hackney, A.C. Vigorous physical activity and cytokines in adolescents. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008, 103, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Owecki, M.; Miczke, A.; Nikisch, E.; Pupek-Musialik, D.; Sowiński, J. Serum resistin concentrations are higher in human obesity but independent from insulin resistance. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2011, 119, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Geyikli, I.; Keskin, M.; Kör, Y.; Akan, M. Increased resistin serum concentrations in patientswith type 1 diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2013, 5, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Walcher, D.; Hess, K.; Berger, R.; Aleksic, M.; Heinz, P.; Bach, H.; Durst, R.; Hausauer, A.; Hombach, V.; Marx, N. Resistin: A newly identified chemokine for human CD4-positive lymphocytes. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 85, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Akoume, M.Y.; Elbakry, M.; Veillette, M.; Franco, A.; Nada, D.; Labelle, H.; Mac-Thiong, J.M.; Grimard, G.; Ouellet, J.; Parent, S.; et al. A Differential Hypofunctionality of Gαi Proteins Occurs in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Correlates with the Risk of Disease Progression. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Araki, S.; Dobashi, K.; Kubo, K.; Kawagoe, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kawada, Y.; Asayama, K.; Shirahata, A. Plasma visfatin concentration as a surrogate marker for visceral fat accumulation in obese children. Obesity 2008, 16, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gortan Cappellari, G.; Barazzoni, R. Ghrelin forms in the modulation of energy balance and metabolism. Eat. Weight Disord. 2019, 24, 997–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ferron, M.; Wei, J.; Yoshizawa, T.; Del Fattore, A.; DePinho, R.A.; Teti, A.; Ducy, P.; Karsenty, G. Insulin signaling in osteoblasts integrates bone remodeling and energy metabolism. Cell 2010, 142, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lee, N.K.; Sowa, H.; Hinoi, E.; Ferron, M.; Ahn, J.D.; Confavreux, C.; Dacquin, R.; Mee, P.J.; McKee, M.D.; Jung, D.Y.; et al. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell 2007, 130, 456–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ferron, M.; Hinoi, E.; Karsenty, G.; Ducy, P. Osteocalcin differentially regulates beta cell and adipocyte gene expression and affects the development of metabolic diseases in wild-type mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5266–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Ferron, M.; McKee, M.D.; Levine, R.L.; Ducy, P.; Karsenty, G. Intermittent injections of osteocalcin improve glucose metabolism and prevent type 2 diabetes in mice. Bone 2012, 50, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Mizokami, A.; Yasutake, Y.; Gao, J.; Matsuda, M.; Takahashi, I.; Takeuchi, H.; Hirata, M. Osteocalcin induces release of glucagon-like peptide-1 and thereby stimulates insulin secretion in mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kulis, A.; Gozdzialska, A.; Drag, J.; Jaskiewicz, J.; Knapik-Czajka, M.; Lipik, E.; Zarzycki, D. Participation of sex hormones in multifactorial pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int. Orthop. 2015, 39, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cheng, J.C.; Qin, L.; Cheung, C.S.; Sher, A.H.; Lee, K.M.; Ng, S.W.; Guo, X. Generalized low areal and volumetric bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1587–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pourabbas Tahvildari, B.; Erfani, M.A.; Nouraei, H.; Sadeghian, M. Evaluation of bone mineral status in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 2014, 6, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Li, X.; Hung, V.W.Y.; Yu, F.W.P.; Hung, A.L.H.; Ng, B.K.W.; Cheng, J.C.Y.; Lam, T.P.; Yip, B.H.K. Persistent low-normal bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with different curve severity: A longitudinal study from presentation to beyond skeletal maturity and peak bone mass. Bone 2020, 133, 115217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Normand, E.; Franco, A.; Marcil, V. Nutrition and physical activity level of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A narrative review. Spine J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lee, W.T.; Cheung, C.S.; Tse, Y.K.; Guo, X.; Qin, L.; Lam, T.P.; Ng, B.K.; Cheng, J.C. Association of osteopenia with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A study of 919 girls. Osteoporos. Int. 2005, 16, 1924–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yu, W.S.; Chan, K.Y.; Yu, F.W.; Ng, B.K.; Lee, K.M.; Qin, L.; Lam, T.P.; Cheng, J.C. Bone structural and mechanical indices in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis evaluated by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Bone 2014, 61, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cheuk, K.Y.; Zhu, T.Y.; Yu, F.W.; Hung, V.W.; Lee, K.M.; Qin, L.; Cheng, J.C.; Lam, T.P. Abnormal Bone Mechanical and Structural Properties in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Study with Finite Element Analysis and Structural Model Index. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2015, 97, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Snyder, B.D.; Zaltz, I.; Breitenbach, M.A.; Kido, T.H.; Myers, E.R.; Emans, J.B. Does bracing affect bone density in adolescent scoliosis? Spine 1995, 20, 1554–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Michaliszyn, S.F.; Lee, S.; Bacha, F.; Tfayli, H.; Farchoukh, L.; Mari, A.; Ferrannini, E.; Arslanian, S. Differences in beta-cell function and insulin secretion in Black vs. White obese adolescents: Do incretin hormones play a role? Pediatr. Diabetes 2017, 18, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oh, T.J.; Kim, M.Y.; Shin, J.Y.; Lee, J.C.; Kim, S.; Park, K.S.; Cho, Y.M. The incretin effect in Korean subjects with normal glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes. Clin. Endocrinol. 2014, 80, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Sun, E.W.; Martin, A.M.; Wattchow, D.A.; de Fontgalland, D.; Rabbitt, P.; Hollington, P.; Young, R.L.; Keating, D.J. Metformin Triggers PYY Secretion in Human Gut Mucosa. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 2668–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tripathi, T.; Gupta, P.; Rai, P.; Sharma, J.; Gupta, V.K.; Singh, N. Osteocalcin and serum insulin-like growth factor-1 as biochemical skeletal maturity indicators. Prog. Orthod. 2017, 18, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Wewer Albrechtsen, N.J.; Asmar, A.; Jensen, F.; Torang, S.; Simonsen, L.; Kuhre, R.E.; Asmar, M.; Veedfald, S.; Plamboeck, A.; Knop, F.K.; et al. A sandwich ELISA for measurement of the primary glucagon-like peptide-1 metabolite. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 313, E284–E291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Yang, H.; Liu, H.; Jiao, Y.; Qian, J. Roux-en-Y Gastrointestinal Bypass Promotes Activation of TGR5 and Peptide YY. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2020, 20, 1262–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Reverter-Branchat, G.; Eugster, P.J.; Kuenzli, C.; Rindlisbacher, B.; Stauffer, T.; Nakas, C.T.; Herzig, D.; Grouzmann, E.; Bally, L. Multiplexed Assay to Quantify the PP-Fold Family of Peptides in Human Plasma Using Microflow Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 2022, 68, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Villano, D.; Zafrilla, P.; Garcia-Viguera, C.; Dominguez-Perles, R. A UHPLC/MS/MS method for the analysis of active and inactive forms of GLP-1 and GIP incretins in human plasma. Talanta 2022, 236, 122806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lawler, K.; Huang-Doran, I.; Sonoyama, T.; Collet, T.H.; Keogh, J.M.; Henning, E.; O’Rahilly, S.; Bottolo, L.; Farooqi, I.S. Leptin-Mediated Changes in the Human Metabolome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, 2541–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Children 09 01619 g001 550
Figure 1. Roles of adipokines on peripheral organs. Leptin, adiponectin, resistin, and visfatin are hormones secreted by the adipose tissue that impact energy metabolism, inflammatory processes, and bone health via their actions on peripheral organs. FFA: Free fatty acid; OB: Osteoblasts; A: Animal studies; H: Human studies. This figure was created using BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Roles of adipokines on peripheral organs. Leptin, adiponectin, resistin, and visfatin are hormones secreted by the adipose tissue that impact energy metabolism, inflammatory processes, and bone health via their actions on peripheral organs. FFA: Free fatty acid; OB: Osteoblasts; A: Animal studies; H: Human studies. This figure was created using BioRender.com.
Children 09 01619 g001
Children 09 01619 g002 550
Figure 2. Flow diagram of participant recruitment.
Figure 2. Flow diagram of participant recruitment.
Children 09 01619 g002
Children 09 01619 g003 550
Figure 3. Adipokine levels in control and AIS participants. AIS participants were divided based on curve severity with Cobb angles < 25° or >25° as the cut-off point. Plasma adipokine levels were assessed by multiplex immunoassays in n = 19 CTRL, n = 21 AIS, n = 10 AIS < 25° and n = 11 AIS > 25°. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 Mann-Whitney test. CTRL: Controls; AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Figure 3. Adipokine levels in control and AIS participants. AIS participants were divided based on curve severity with Cobb angles < 25° or >25° as the cut-off point. Plasma adipokine levels were assessed by multiplex immunoassays in n = 19 CTRL, n = 21 AIS, n = 10 AIS < 25° and n = 11 AIS > 25°. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 Mann-Whitney test. CTRL: Controls; AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Children 09 01619 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical and anthropometric characteristics of control and AIS participants.
Table 1. Clinical and anthropometric characteristics of control and AIS participants.
Controls
(n = 19)		AIS
(n = 19)		p Value 1
Family history of AIS (%)063<0.0001 *
Age (years)14.8 ± 2.114.8 ± 1.70.924
Age at diagnosis (years)-13.0 ± 1.7-
Highest Cobb angle (°)-27.1 ± 10.5-
Risser score-2.8 ± 1.8-
Age of menarche (years)12.0 (9.0–15.0)12.5 (11.0–14.0)0.969
Tanner stage (breast)3.7 ± 1.03.4 ± 1.00.350
Tanner stage (pubic hair)3.6 ± 1.13.3 ± 0.80.310
Height (cm)160.8 ± 9.9164.2± 9.30.142
Height-for-age (z-score)0.33 ± 1.010.60 ± 1.140.419
Weight (kg)54.2 ± 12.950.3 ± 9.00.158
BMI (kg/m2)20.6 ± 3.618.5 ± 1.90.013 *
BMI-for-age (z-score)0.09 ± 1.11−0.59 ± 0.810.016 *
Waist circumference (cm)76.0 ± 9.171.9 ± 5.60.055
Waist-to-height ratio0.47 ± 0.040.44 ± 0.030.009 *
BMI: Body mass index; AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Corrected height was used for AIS participants. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range). 1 Data were compared using a chi-square test, paired t-test, or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for non-normally distributed variables. * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Bone mineral density and body composition of control and AIS participants.
Table 2. Bone mineral density and body composition of control and AIS participants.
Controls
(n = 17)		AIS
(n = 17)		p Value 1
BMD total body less head (z-score)0.32 ± 0.88−0.41 ± 0.800.044 *
BMC total body less head (g)1798.1 ± 414.61666.9 ± 293.90.286
BMD lumbar spine (z-score)−0.11 ± 0.87−0.48 ± 0.930.241
BMD femoral neck (z-score)0.59 ± 1.59−0.54 ± 1.200.043 *
Fat (%)29.2 ± 7.224.4 ± 5.90.036 *
Fat mass (g)15676.1 ± 6106.912064.1 ± 3929.80.024 *
Fat mass index (g/m2)0.59 ± 0.210.44 ± 0.130.007 *
Lean mass (g)36558.5 ± 6466.236912.3 ± 5578.10.865
Lean mass index (g/m2)1.40 ± 0.181.33 ± 0.110.273
BMD: Bone mineral density; AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data are presented as mean ± SD. 1 Data were compared using paired t-test. * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Nutrition and physical activity of control and AIS participants.
Table 3. Nutrition and physical activity of control and AIS participants.
Controls
(n = 19)		AIS
(n = 19)		p Value 1
Caloric intake (kcal/day)2026.6 ± 599.22058.1 ± 463.40.868
Estimated energy requirement (kcal/day)2063. 6 ± 341.81881.0 ± 221.20.066
Energy balance (%)99.6 ± 28.9109.1 ± 19.30.250
Energy balance (kcal/day)−36.9 ± 640.6193.5 ± 360.10.178
Moderate-to-intense physical activity (hrs/week)5.3 (0.3–15.0)0.8 (0.0–15.0)0.005 *
Screen time (hrs/day)2.5 (1.0–6.0)4.5 (1.5–10.0)0.006 *
AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range). 1 Data were compared using paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for non-normally distributed variables. * p < 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Biochemical characteristics of control and AIS participants.
Table 4. Biochemical characteristics of control and AIS participants.
Number of Pairs (n)ControlsAISp Value 1
Glucose (mmol/L)194.9 (4.4–5.5)5.1 (4.5–6.3)0.160
Insulin (pmol/mL)1458.11 ± 20.1460.01 ± 23.880.755
HOMA-IR141.8 ± 0.72.0 ± 1.00.584
C-peptide (pg/mL)171101 ± 2871181 ± 2950.348
QUICKI140.35 ± 0.020.35 ± 0.030.615
Triglycerides (mmol/L)190.75 (0.40–1.22)0.70 (0.49–1.42)0.868
Cholesterol (mmol/L)193.78 ± 0.494.06 ± 0.630.111
HDL-C (mmol/L)191.35 ± 0.201.36 ± 0.210.854
LDL-C (mmol/L)192.07 ± 0.402.35 ± 0.530.063
ApoB (g/L)190.63 ± 0.130.71 ± 0.150.108
ApoA1181.37 (1.11–1.73)1.42 (1.19–1.82)0.502
ApoB/ApoA1180.46 ± 0.100.50 ± 0.110.243
HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; QUICKI: Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; ApoB: Apolipoprotein B; ApoA1: Apolipoprotein A1; AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range). 1 Data are compared using paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for non-normally distributed variables.
Table
Table 5. Fasting levels of metabolic parameters in control and AIS participants.
Table 5. Fasting levels of metabolic parameters in control and AIS participants.
Number of Pairs (n)Controls
(n = 19)		AIS
(n = 19)		p Value 1
Leptin (ng/mL)164.6 (1.3–9.8)2.8 (0.4–10.3)0.083
Adiponectin (μg/mL)1526.2 (6.6–73.8)84.7 (11.1–287.2)0.007 *
Leptin/adiponectin ratio120.258 (0.024–1.053)0.042 (0.005–0.320)0.005 *
Resistin (ng/mL)1914.29 (9.52–19.98)14.90 (10.15–42.29)0.358
Visfatin (ng/mL)135.93 (2.40–61.50)4.12 (1.00–34.46)0.787
Active ghrelin (pg/mL)1366.68 ± 39.4881.10 ± 51.060.357
Total ghrelin (pg/mL)19384.5 ± 133.8452.3 ± 265.60.160
GIP (ng/mL)17366.8 (149.4–660.6)415.2 (136.4–1408)0.182
GLP-1 active (pmol/L)177.59 (5.95–18.71)7.63 (6.08–9.06)0.678
GLP-1 total (pmol/L)1925.33 ± 7.7825.20 ± 10.580.970
GLP-2 (ng/mL)171.90 ± 0.662.08 ± 0.650.460
PYY (pg/mL)1988.10 ± 55.9976.38 ± 59.450.510
DPP-4 activity (pmol/min)18580.5 ± 169.0551.8 ± 193.30.330
OCN total (ng/mL)1951.85 ± 14.8346.62 ± 11.830.237
ucOCN (ng/mL)1810.09 (3.05–51.77)10.49 (1.73–39.21)0.832
ucOCN/OCN ratio (%)1828.22 ± 22.9529.16 ± 19.230.841
GIP: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide; GLP-1: Glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-2: Glucagon-like peptide-2; PYY: Peptide tyrosine tyrosine; DPP-4: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4; OCN: Osteocalcin; ucOCN: Uncarboxylated osteocalcin; AIS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range). 1 Data were compared using paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for non-normally distributed variables. * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Normand, E.; Franco, A.; Alos, N.; Parent, S.; Moreau, A.; Marcil, V. Circulatory Adipokines and Incretins in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study. Children 2022, 9, 1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111619

AMA Style

Normand E, Franco A, Alos N, Parent S, Moreau A, Marcil V. Circulatory Adipokines and Incretins in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study. Children. 2022; 9(11):1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Normand, Emilie, Anita Franco, Nathalie Alos, Stefan Parent, Alain Moreau, and Valérie Marcil. 2022. "Circulatory Adipokines and Incretins in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study" Children 9, no. 11: 1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111619

APA Style

Normand, E., Franco, A., Alos, N., Parent, S., Moreau, A., & Marcil, V. (2022). Circulatory Adipokines and Incretins in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study. Children, 9(11), 1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9111619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop