Next Article in Journal
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Tube Thoracostomy with Fibrinolytics for Treatment of Empyema in Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
Previous Article in Journal
The Identification and Management of Refeeding Syndrome in Inpatient Severely Acutely Malnourished Children Aged 6 to 59 Months in Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Bluish-Green Coloration of the Nipples: A Diagnostic Clue for Retroareolar Cysts

Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2025, 12(9), 1224; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091224
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 10 September 2025 / Accepted: 11 September 2025 / Published: 13 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Global Pediatric Health)

Abstract

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Bilateral bluish-green retroareolar macules in a pubertal girl were diagnosed as benign retroareolar cysts through dermoscopic and ultrasound evaluation, with stability over one year of conservative management.
What is the implication of the main finding?
  • Recognizing this benign presentation can prevent unnecessary diagnostic procedures and support conservative management, preserving normal pubertal breast development.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Bluish-green discoloration of the nipples in pubertal girls often poses a diagnostic dilemma. Methods: We describe the case of an 11-year-old girl who developed bilateral and symmetrical bluish-green macules in the retroareolar area over eight months. Dermoscopic and ultrasound examinations revealed benign retroareolar cysts, with no signs of malignancy or other alarming features. Differential diagnoses such as vascular malformations, hemangiomas, hematomas, and blue nevi were carefully considered and excluded based on clinical and imaging findings. Results: A diagnosis of bilateral retroareolar cysts was established. The patient underwent conservative management, and ultrasound follow-ups over one year showed no changes. Conclusions: This case underscores the importance of thorough evaluation to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures and to protect the delicate development of the pubertal breast.

1. Introduction

Bluish lesions appearing in the nipple area on pubertal girls present a significant diagnostic challenge. Accurate identification of this clinical picture is crucial for implementing appropriate conservative management, thereby preventing unwarranted diagnostic procedures like skin biopsies or extensive radiological examinations. These interventions could indeed negatively interfere with the normal anatomical and functional development of a particularly sensitive region. Although the prevalence of this condition is unknown, it is likely underestimated, as mild or self-limiting cases may go unreported or be misdiagnosed [1]. We report the case of an 11-year-old girl who was referred to our clinic with a bluish discoloration of the nipples caused by retroareolar cysts.

2. Case Presentation

An 11-year-old girl presented to our clinic with bilateral and symmetrical bluish-green lesions observed in the retroareolar region. The peculiarity of the present case is the bilaterality of the lesions (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
She reported that these lesions had first appeared approximately eight months prior to her visit. The patient was in good general health; she was not taking any medications and denied any prior surgical procedures. Upon physical examination, the lesions were noted to be superficial, soft, and smooth to palpation. The discoloration did not blanch during palpation. There was no evidence of discharge or solid thickening. Dermoscopic examination revealed a homogeneous, unstructured greenish discoloration with blurred edges (Figure 3).
An ultrasound (US) examination was therefore performed, selected for its non-invasive nature, absence of ionizing radiation, wide availability, and relatively low cost. In addition, US offers high sensitivity in the evaluation of superficial soft tissues and allows real-time imaging, making it particularly suitable for the assessment of developing breast tissue. The examination revealed developing mammary glands with a hypoechogenic retro- and peri-areolar echostructure and bilateral anechogenic formations, the largest of which was elongated and approximately 13 mm in diameter (Figure 4). Color Doppler evaluation was also performed and showed no internal vascular signals.
Based on the findings, a diagnosis of bilateral retroareolar cysts was proposed, and conservative management was chosen. The cysts remained unchanged during subsequent follow-up visits. No symptoms such as mammary tenderness were reported. One year after the initial appearance of the lesions, a new ultrasound examination confirmed their substantial stability (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

Retroareolar cysts, also known as Montgomery cysts, occur due to obstruction of the Montgomery’s gland ducts [1,2]. The prevalence of this condition is unknown but likely underestimated. Few cases have been reported in the literature; a recent review article summarized nine cases (Table 1) [3].
Montgomery’s areolar tubercles are specialized sebaceous glands localized in the areolar region, structurally and functionally associated with the terminal portions of the lactiferous ducts that originate from the underlying mammary lobules. These glands contribute to areolar physiology, particularly during lactation, by secreting lubricating and antimicrobial substances. Montgomery’s areolar tubercles typically measure 2 mm or less in diameter [2].
The diagnosis of retroareolar cysts is based on clinical and dermoscopic evaluation, supported by a detailed medical history and confirmed by ultrasound examination (Table 2) [3].
The characteristic dermoscopic blue green discoloration of the cyst is likely related to the Tyndall effect. Management is generally conservative because the majority of cases resolve spontaneously with an excellent prognosis. The clinical manifestations largely depend on whether the cyst is infected or not. Infected cysts may present as a palpable mass accompanied by mastalgia and peri-areolar erythema. In contrast, noninfected (simple) cysts are often asymptomatic and may be incidentally detected [1].
Differential diagnosis may include vascular and lymphatic lesions, hematomas, and blue nevi [4]. Vascular lesions, such as deep haemangiomas, typically present early in life and exhibit distinctive dermoscopic features, including polymorphous vascular structures and dilated linear vessels [6]. Lymphatic malformations, by contrast, often appear as multiloculated, translucent vesicles and may fluctuate in size due to fluid accumulation or infection. Hematomas can mimic cystic or vascular lesions but are usually associated with a history of trauma and demonstrate characteristic imaging features on ultrasound. They typically resolve spontaneously within 2–3 weeks. The sonographic appearance of a hematoma varies depending on its age and the degree of internal liquefaction. In the acute phase, a hematoma typically appears as a hyperechoic focal collection with ill-defined margins. As the hematoma evolves, it undergoes progressive liquefaction, ultimately assuming the appearance of a complex cystic lesion with internal echogenic debris and fibrous septations [7]. Common blue nevi exhibit distinctive dermoscopic features that generally allow for confident and accurate diagnosis. These lesions typically present as homogeneously blue structures, ranging in color from blue-gray to steel-blue. The pigmentation is evenly distributed and sharply circumscribed, often appearing as a solitary, well-demarcated area without additional dermoscopic structures. Notably, common blue nevi lack features such as pigment networks, dots, globules, streaks, or vascular patterns [8]. Blue nevi, on ultrasound examination, typically do not appear as cystic lesions and do not present bilaterally; instead, they exhibit a characteristic hypoechoic, ‘dish-shaped’ pattern [9].
In the patient’s medical history, no prior surgical procedures were reported. However, had such procedures been present, alternative diagnostic hypotheses would have needed consideration. For instance, following a ductoscopy involving a tracer dye like methylene blue, it would be crucial to recognize the possibility of persistent blue discoloration on the nipple surface.
The same considerations apply to other dyes commonly used in surgical settings, such as patent blue and isosulfan blue, which are frequently employed in sentinel lymph node mapping. Gentian violet (crystal violet) is another dye with the potential to cause cutaneous staining and has been used in the treatment of nipple thrush. In some cases, cysts may present with unusual imaging features, including internal echoes, layered fluid levels, internal septa, or thickened walls, which can complicate diagnosis. In such situations, aspiration can help clarify the nature of the lesion and exclude other possibilities like a galactocele, an abscess, or a more complex cyst [7].

4. Conclusions

In summary, retroareolar cysts typically do not require intervention in the absence of inflammatory signs or secondary infection. In the presented case, the diagnosis was established through clinical dermoscopic examination and targeted high-frequency ultrasound, which confirmed the cystic nature of the lesion without features suggestive of malignancy. Given the typically benign and self-limiting nature of these lesions, preserving the integrity of the developing breast tissue is important. Invasive procedures, which could interfere with the natural development of the mammary glands, should be avoided whenever possible.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.B., T.C., G.G. and P.G.; validation, P.G. and G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.C.; writing—review and editing, F.B.; visualization, P.G.; supervision, G.G.; project administration, F.B.; funding acquisition, F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy, legal and ethical reasons.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Almuhanna, A.F.; Almuhanna, A.F.; Alzuabi, R.S.; Alshamlan, R.A.; Almarhoon, F.H. Cyst of Montgomery: An uncommon adolescent breast lump. J. Fam. Community Med. 2020, 27, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huneeus, A.; Schilling, A.; Horvath, E.; Pinochet, M.; Carrasco, O. Retroareolar Cysts in the Adolescent. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2003, 16, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mioso, G.; Gnesotto, L.; Cutrone, M.; Parlangeli, A.; Naldi, L.; Sechi, A. Pubertal retroareolar cysts presenting as bluish lumps: New cases and literature review. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2024, 60, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sechi, A.; Vaccari, S.; Parlangeli, A.; Vara, G.; Patrizi, A. Homogeneous blue lumps of the nipple-areola complex in pubertal girls. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2021, 38, 887–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rusiñol, L.; Amat-Samaranch, V.; Baselga, E.; Puig, L.; Roé, E. Prepubertal retroareolar cysts. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2021, 38, 1368–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Oiso, N.; Kawada, A. The Dermoscopic Features in Infantile Hemangioma. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2011, 28, 591–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, E.J.; Chang, Y.-W.; Oh, J.H.; Hwang, J.; Hong, S.S.; Kim, H. Breast Lesions in Children and Adolescents: Diagnosis and Management. Korean J. Radiol. 2018, 19, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Haliasos, E.C.; Kerner, M.; Jaimes, N.; Zalaudek, I.; Malvehy, J.; Hofmann-Wellenhof, R.; Braun, R.P.; Marghoob, A.A. Dermoscopy for the Pediatric Dermatologist Part III: Dermoscopy of Melanocytic Lesions. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2013, 30, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Samimi, M.; Perrinaud, A.; Naouri, M.; Maruani, A.; Perrodeau, E.; Vaillant, L.; Machet, L. High-resolution ultrasonography assists the differential diagnosis of blue naevi and cutaneous metastases of melanoma: Ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of naevi and melanoma metastases. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010, 163, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Bluish retroareolar cystic lesion.
Figure 1. Bluish retroareolar cystic lesion.
Children 12 01224 g001
Figure 2. Bilaterality of lesions.
Figure 2. Bilaterality of lesions.
Children 12 01224 g002
Figure 3. Dermoscopy showing unstructured greenish discoloration with blurred edges.
Figure 3. Dermoscopy showing unstructured greenish discoloration with blurred edges.
Children 12 01224 g003
Figure 4. Baseline ultrasound (T0) showing an anechoic lesion with well-defined, regular margins (maximum diameter: 13 mm), consistent with a simple cyst.
Figure 4. Baseline ultrasound (T0) showing an anechoic lesion with well-defined, regular margins (maximum diameter: 13 mm), consistent with a simple cyst.
Children 12 01224 g004
Figure 5. Ultrasound examination at 12-month follow-up confirming the presence of an anechoic lesion with regular margins, measuring approximately 15 mm in maximum diameter, stable over time.
Figure 5. Ultrasound examination at 12-month follow-up confirming the presence of an anechoic lesion with regular margins, measuring approximately 15 mm in maximum diameter, stable over time.
Children 12 01224 g005
Table 1. Clinical cases.
Table 1. Clinical cases.
PatientReferencesAgeClinical Presentation
1Sechi [4]10 years 3 monthsTwo weeks’ history of monolateral blue cyst
2Sechi [4]10 years 6 monthsThree-month history of bilateral blue lumps
3Rusiñol [5]11 yearsBluish cyst, asymptomatic, 1 year duration
4Rusiñol [5]12 yearsAsymptomatic bluish cyst, 3 years duration
5Huneeus [2]Not reportedBluish appearance of retroareolar cyst
6Huneeus [2]Not reportedBluish appearance of retroareolar cyst
7Mioso [3]10 years 2 monthsMonolateral green-blue cyst, 2 weeks duration
8Mioso [3]11 years 4 monthsBilateral blue lumps, 1 year duration
9Mioso [3]11 years 7 monthsMonolateral blue cyst, 1-year duration
10Our case11 yearsEight-month history of bilateral symmetrical bluish-green cyst
Table 2. Differential diagnosis.
Table 2. Differential diagnosis.
Differential DiagnosisClinical FeaturesDermoscopic FeaturesUltrasound FeaturesAge/Notes
Retroareolar cysts Superficial, soft, smooth and bluish lesionsHomogeneous, unstructured greenish discoloration with blurred edgesAnechoic, oval, thin-walled mass with posterior enhancement; no Doppler flowPrepuberal age
Deep haemangiomasBluish-purplish swelling or massNormal or bluish skin,
sometimes with a telangiectatic hue
Well-defined, hypoechoic, hypervascular structure with rapid flow (growth phase); more echogenic with reduced vessel size/density (involution phase)Early in life. Consider presence of superficial hemangioma component.
Lymphatic malformationsMultiloculated, translucent vesiclesYellowish-white lacunae separated by a thin, pale, whitish areaWell-defined, hyperechoic lesion with heterogeneous texture; hypervascular on color DopplerEarly in life
HematomasPainful lumps or bumps characterized by skin discolorationViolaceous discoloration with blurred edges; evolves into green/yellowish hues over timeHyperechoic with ill-defined margins acutely; progresses to complex cystic lesion with internal debris and septationsResolve spontaneously within 2–3 weeks
Common blue neviSharply circumscribed, homogeneously blue lesionsFree from pigment networks, dots, globules, streaks, or vascular patternsHypoechoic, dish-shaped patternNon-bilateral
Surgical dye-related discolorationPersistent blue discoloration on the nipple surfaceHomogeneous bluish discoloration with blurred marginsNegativeConsider surgical history
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Curic, T.; Bellinato, F.; Gisondi, P.; Girolomoni, G. Bluish-Green Coloration of the Nipples: A Diagnostic Clue for Retroareolar Cysts. Children 2025, 12, 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091224

AMA Style

Curic T, Bellinato F, Gisondi P, Girolomoni G. Bluish-Green Coloration of the Nipples: A Diagnostic Clue for Retroareolar Cysts. Children. 2025; 12(9):1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Curic, Tea, Francesco Bellinato, Paolo Gisondi, and Giampiero Girolomoni. 2025. "Bluish-Green Coloration of the Nipples: A Diagnostic Clue for Retroareolar Cysts" Children 12, no. 9: 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091224

APA Style

Curic, T., Bellinato, F., Gisondi, P., & Girolomoni, G. (2025). Bluish-Green Coloration of the Nipples: A Diagnostic Clue for Retroareolar Cysts. Children, 12(9), 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop