Next Article in Journal
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Newborns with Congenital Gastrointestinal Atresias
Previous Article in Journal
The Often-Unmentioned Key Points of Orthotics—A Short Comment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Assessing Discharge Readiness After Propofol-Mediated Deep Sedation in Pediatric Dental Procedures: Revisiting Discharge Practices with the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score

by
Merve Hayriye Kocaoglu
1,* and
Cagil Vural
2
1
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Türkiye
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2025, 12(9), 1155; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091155
Submission received: 31 July 2025 / Revised: 20 August 2025 / Accepted: 28 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Pain Management and Sedation in Children)

Abstract

Background: Efficient and safe discharge is critical in pediatric dental procedures performed under deep sedation in non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) settings. Traditional institutional criteria may delay discharge due to subjectivity. Objective: This study compared the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score (MAS) and institutional discharge criteria to determine which provides faster and reliable discharge decisions. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 100 children (ages 2–10, ASA I–III) undergoing deep sedation for dental treatment were evaluated. Two nurse anesthetists independently assessed discharge readiness every five minutes using either MAS or institutional criteria. Demographic data, BMI percentile, ASA class, anesthesia duration, and propofol dose were recorded. Discharge times were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank and subgroup analyses and correlation tests. Results: MAS allowed significantly earlier discharge than institutional criteria (24.75 ± 7.33 vs. 36.79 ± 8.59 min, p = 0.01). The agreement between methods was poor (ICC = 0.06). Discharge time varied significantly by BMI percentile (p = 0.01); obese children had shorter recovery times, while time differences were greater in overweight children. No adverse events or readmissions occurred. Conclusions: MAS provides a quicker and equally safe discharge assessment in pediatric dental sedation. Its use may enhance workflow efficiency and standardize recovery decisions in NORA settings lacking formal PACUs.
Keywords: pediatric sedation; procedural sedation; discharge; modified aldrete recovery score; non-operating room anesthesia; recovery assessment; propofol pediatric sedation; procedural sedation; discharge; modified aldrete recovery score; non-operating room anesthesia; recovery assessment; propofol

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kocaoglu, M.H.; Vural, C. Assessing Discharge Readiness After Propofol-Mediated Deep Sedation in Pediatric Dental Procedures: Revisiting Discharge Practices with the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score. Children 2025, 12, 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091155

AMA Style

Kocaoglu MH, Vural C. Assessing Discharge Readiness After Propofol-Mediated Deep Sedation in Pediatric Dental Procedures: Revisiting Discharge Practices with the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score. Children. 2025; 12(9):1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kocaoglu, Merve Hayriye, and Cagil Vural. 2025. "Assessing Discharge Readiness After Propofol-Mediated Deep Sedation in Pediatric Dental Procedures: Revisiting Discharge Practices with the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score" Children 12, no. 9: 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091155

APA Style

Kocaoglu, M. H., & Vural, C. (2025). Assessing Discharge Readiness After Propofol-Mediated Deep Sedation in Pediatric Dental Procedures: Revisiting Discharge Practices with the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score. Children, 12(9), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop