School-Based Physical Activity, Cognitive Performance and Circadian Rhythms: Rethinking the Timing of Movement in Education

Background. Physical activity enhances cognitive performance in adolescents, yet the role of circadian timing within the school day remains poorly understood. Purpose. This study examined whether the timing of school-based physical activity (morning, midday, afternoon) influences cognitive performance, subjective alertness, and mood states in early adolescents. Methods. A 12-week crossover intervention was conducted with 102 students (aged 12–13 years) from southern Italy. Each class participated in three 4-week conditions of structured physical activity scheduled in the morning (8:10–9:10), midday (12:10–13:10), and afternoon (15:10–16:10), separated by one-week washouts. Cognitive outcomes (d2-R, Digit Span backward, TMT-A), subjective alertness (KSS), and mood (PANAS-C) were assessed at baseline and after each condition. Analyses employed linear mixed-effects models and repeated-measures ANOVAs, adjusting for sex, BMI, chronotype, and sleep duration. Results. Morning activity produced the strongest improvements in attention (d2-R, η²p = 0.16), working memory (Digit Span backward, η²p = 0.06), processing speed (TMT-A, η²p = 0.08), alertness (KSS, η²p = 0.19), and positive affect (PANAS-C, η²p = 0.05). Midday sessions yielded moderate benefits (d2-R, η²p = 0.09; Digit Span backward, η²p = 0.05; TMT-A, η²p = 0.07; KSS, η²p = 0.09), while afternoon activity showed the weakest or nonsignificant changes (all η²p < 0.05). Chronotype moderated the effects on attention and working memory, with morning types deriving the largest gains. Conclusions. The timing of physical activity is a critical determinant of its cognitive and affective benefits. Incorporating morning exercise into school timetables may represent a low-cost, scalable strategy to optimize both learning readiness and well-being in adolescents.