Abstract
Universal health coverage has been proposed as a strategy to improve health in low- and middle-income countries, but this depends on a good provision of health services. Under-5 mortality (U5M) reflects the quality of health services, and its reduction has been a milestone in modern society, reducing global mortality rates by more than two-thirds between 1990 and 2020. However, despite these impressive achievements, they are still insufficient, and most deaths in children under 5 can be prevented with the provision of timely and high-quality health services. The aim of this paper is to conduct a literature review on amenable (treatable) mortality in children under 5. This indicator is based on the concept that deaths from certain causes should not occur in the presence of timely and effective medical care. A systematic and exhaustive review of available literature on amenable mortality in children under 5 was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, OVID medline, Scielo, Epistemonikos, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar in both English and Spanish. Both primary sources, such as scientific articles, and secondary sources, such as bibliographic indices, websites, and databases, were used. Results: The main cause of amenable mortality in children under 5 was respiratory disease, and the highest proportion of deaths occurred in the perinatal period. Approximately 65% of avoidable deaths in children under 5 were due to amenable mortality, that is, due to insufficient quality in the provision of health services. Most deaths in all countries and around the world are preventable, primarily through effective and timely access to healthcare (amenable mortality) and the management of public health programs focused on mothers and children (preventable mortality).
1. Introduction
Health is a fundamental human right, and Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is recognized as a critical means to achieve that right [1]. The objective of UHC is expressed in the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under Goal 3, which focuses on health (target 3.8) [2].
Globally, under-5 mortality has decreased by over two-thirds between 1990 and 2020, dropping from 93 to 39 deaths per 1000 live births [3]. Indeed, mortality rates have declined across all age groups over the last five decades, with the greatest reductions observed in children under five [4,5]. Despite these impressive advancements, inequalities persist among countries and within them (regional disparities), especially in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, more than half of these early childhood deaths were due to conditions that could have been prevented or treated with simple and affordable interventions, making them amenable [6,7,8].
Although infant mortality rates have long been used in global assessments of a country’s or region’s health services, Rutstein et al. (1976) proposed a more comprehensive and systematic approach, including other causes of mortality, to assess the quality of care as an outcome measure [9]. A 5% reduction in GDP per capita in 2020 was estimated to cause an additional 282,996 deaths in children under 5. At 10% and 15%, recessions led to higher losses of under-5 lives, increasing to 585,802 and 911,026 additional deaths, respectively [10].
Amenable (treatable) mortality is a subset of the broader concept of avoidable mortality, which includes deaths that can be prevented (reduction in incidence) and those that can be treated (reduction in case fatality) [11]. While healthcare can influence the former, its greatest impact lies in the latter, i.e., amenable mortality [12]. In this sense, amenable mortality is understood as an indicator of the quality and accessibility of healthcare systems, relating to deaths that can be prevented through timely and high-quality medical diagnosis and treatment, whereas preventable mortality encompasses deaths that could be avoided through public health interventions such as health promotion, disease prevention, specific protection measures, and the implementation of sectoral and cross-sectoral public policies [13,14]. Therefore, avoidable mortality encompasses both amenable and preventable mortality [15,16]. In the same vein, the World Health Organization (WHO) outlines the difference between potentially avoidable premature mortality, potentially preventable mortality, and potentially treatable mortality [17,18].
The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review and analyze the trends in amenable mortality rates among children under five in countries and subregions, their causes according to ICD-10 where possible, and assess potential inequalities in healthcare delivery influencing amenable mortality in children.
2. Materials and Methods
Amenable (treatable) mortality is defined as deaths that can be prevented through timely and effective healthcare interventions. This review focused specifically on amenable mortality among children under five years of age, a critical public health concern.
2.1. Search Strategy
A comprehensive search was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Epistemonikos. The search terms used were:
- “amenable mortality”
- “treatable mortality”
- “child”
These terms were combined and searched in both English and Spanish to ensure inclusivity and comprehensiveness.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Studies investigating amenable mortality in children under five years old.
- Articles published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese.
- Full-text articles available.
- Exclusion Criteria:
- Studies not focusing on amenable mortality (e.g., studies focusing solely on preventable mortality or all-cause mortality).
- Reviews, editorials, letters, or opinion pieces.
- Articles without full-text availability.
2.3. Data Extraction
A standardized data extraction form was utilized to collect relevant information from the included studies. The extracted data included:
- Study characteristics: Authors, publication year, and study design.
- Population characteristics: Age range and sample size.
- Methods: Data sources, inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Outcomes: Amenable mortality rates and causes of death.
2.4. Data Synthesis
A narrative synthesis of the extracted data was conducted. This synthesis involved summarizing the findings of the included studies, identifying key themes and patterns, and discussing the overall body of evidence on amenable mortality in children under five years of age.
2.5. Study Selection
The initial database search identified a total of 1765 articles from various sources:
- PubMed (n = 383)
- Epistemonikos (n = 27)
- ScienceDirect (n = 646)
- SciELO (n = 27)
- Scopus (n = 460)
- Web of Science (n = 217)
After removing duplicates, 1274 articles remained. Following a full-text review, 57 articles were included in the analysis. The selection process is illustrated in the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.
2.6. Results Overview
The search yielded 1234 unique records. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 studies were deemed eligible for full-text review. Of these, 21 studies met the final inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis.
3. Results
The 57 identified articles related to treatable mortality in children under 5 years old provide valuable insights. Among these articles: 31 focus on countries with low to middle incomes, 19 originate from high-income countries and 7 studies are based on global data (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of Articles on Avoidable Childhood Mortality.
3.1. Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)
Using data from the World Bank, Truche et al. conducted a study on the association between surgical workforce and potentially avoidable infant mortality. They found a statistically significant association between the number of healthcare professionals and a lower mortality rate in children under 5 years of age. Moreover, they observed that increasing the surgical workforce to 40 professionals per 100,000, as recommended by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, could prevent approximately 270,000 to 600,000 potentially avoidable deaths in children under 5 years. Most of the prevented deaths (61%) were in neonates [22,23]. These findings have significant implications for policymakers and healthcare providers in low and middle-income countries, suggesting that increasing the number of surgical workers could be an effective way to reduce infant mortality. The study also highlights the need for further research on the impact of surgical care on infant mortality, which could help identify the most effective ways to increase access to surgical care in low and middle-income countries.
In a study analyzing aggregated data from 2000 to 2014 in Latin American and Caribbean countries, Álvarez, Aburto, and Canudas-Romo found that treatable diseases contribute the most to the variability gap in life expectancy in both infant and childhood mortality (from 0 to 5 years) [24].
Aburto et al. demonstrated a significant reduction in overall mortality in male children but revealed inequality with female children’s mortality from 1990 to 2015 across all 32 Mexican states. The improvements were largely attributed to reductions in infectious and respiratory diseases, which are among the most treatable causes of mortality. However, substantial disparities persist between states with low and high economic development, indicating significant room for improvement. The study recommends that the Mexican government continue investing in programs to enhance children’s health, such as the Seguro Popular program, while addressing income inequality and improving access to healthcare in states with low economic development. Furthermore, addressing social determinants of health, such as poverty, malnutrition, and lack of education, especially among mothers of children under 5 years, is essential [25].
In Brazil, the Estratégia de Saúde da Família (ESF; Family Health Strategy), a community-based primary care program that started in 1994, has generated a beneficial impact on mortality rates. It has shown reductions in amenable mortality, perinatal mortality, infectious and circulatory diseases, as well as infant mortality rates, consistent with the implementation of ESF and the percentage of coverage in different Brazilian states. The success of ESF in reducing mortality rates in Brazil can be attributed to several reasons. Firstly, ESF provides comprehensive primary care services to families in their homes and communities, ensuring access to preventive care and treatment of chronic diseases. Secondly, ESF operates with a healthcare team comprising doctors, nurses, and community health workers, enabling a more comprehensive and coordinated approach to healthcare. Thirdly, ESF focuses on prevention and early intervention, which contributes to reducing the severity of illnesses and the risk of death [26,27]. The effect of ESF on unattended deaths was slightly stronger in municipalities with a higher human development index, indicating inequalities in healthcare provision in rural areas [28].
Another study found that expanding ESF coverage was associated with a reduction in mortality from amenable outpatient conditions, such as respiratory diseases (COPD and asthma), epilepsy, and gastric ulcers. Asthma mortality in childhood and adolescence in Brazil showed a decline in all age groups evaluated, except in the 5 to 9-year-old age group, with a more significant reduction observed in children under 5 during the 20-year study period [29]. The decrease in asthma-related mortality was observed in all geographic regions of the country. However, higher mortality rates were found in the Northeast and North regions, possibly reflecting socioeconomic inequities that result in difficulties in accessing and limited quality of healthcare resources. There was a higher vulnerability among children under 5, underscoring the need for increased attention and prioritization of health actions [30].
In a study analyzing regional mortality patterns due to perinatal causes in Brazilian children, it was found that these represent 57% of all infant deaths, with congenital malformations accounting for 11.2% of these deaths. Mortality levels were higher in the Northeast and North regions and lower in the South and Southeast regions, with the Central-West region falling in between. The study highlighted the need for interventions to reduce perinatal mortality rates in Brazil, such as improving access to healthcare, nutrition, and education in rural areas, reducing extreme poverty and teenage pregnancy [31].
In an ecological study at a public hospital in Brazil, De Assis et al. found that 41.4% of deaths were classified as difficult to reduce, 28.3% as reducible, and 30.4% as avoidable [32].
In Kenya, most women would be willing to give birth in a healthcare facility if it were affordable and accessible to them. However, various barriers prevent this from happening. These barriers include cost, distance to healthcare facilities, cultural beliefs, and lack of information [33]. The study suggests that promoting health for women and their partners can help them understand the importance of prenatal care and plan ahead for childbirth with qualified healthcare professionals. Addressing these barriers is crucial to encouraging women to seek healthcare facilities for childbirth.
In Sierra Leone, between 2019 and 2020, 40% of amenable deaths in children under 5 were due to malaria and respiratory infections, while asphyxia and trauma were the leading causes in neonates. The under-5 mortality rate in Sierra Leone is 133 deaths per 1000 live births, and the maternal mortality ratio is 510 deaths per 100,000 live births. The study also found significant disparities in mortality in Sierra Leone, with higher under-5 mortality rates in rural areas compared to urban areas, and higher maternal mortality ratios in the northern and eastern regions of the country compared to the southern and western regions [34].
In an observational retrospective case search to identify causes of death in children under 5 who died in health centers in Yaoundé, Cameroon, between 2006 and 2012, pneumococcal diseases were found to be the leading cause of death, accounting for 11.0% of all deaths. Other major causes of death included malaria (8.3%), sepsis (10.0%), malnutrition (8.3%), and gastroenteritis/diarrhea (6.2%). The study highlights the need for interventions to reduce the burden of pneumococcal diseases in Cameroon, improving access to vaccination, early diagnosis, and treatment [35].
In Ethiopia, Deribew et al. found that the main causes of death in children under 5 between 2004–2005 were neonatal deaths and pneumonia. The study emphasizes the need for interventions to address the determinants of child mortality, such as providing free or subsidized education for girls to increase the number of literate women with the knowledge and skills to care for their children, offering family planning services to space births and reduce the risk of maternal and infant mortality, promoting breastfeeding to provide babies with the nutrients they need to grow and develop healthily, and improving access to healthcare [36]. In a study conducted in a referral hospital in rural Ethiopia, researchers investigated risk factors for neonatal mortality in a special care unit, finding risk factors associated with increased mortality, such as neonates referred from other health facilities or from home, moderate hypothermia at admission, diagnosis of late-onset sepsis, low birthweight, etc., and factors associated with decreased mortality, such as being admitted in 2017 vs. 2014 and older age at admission [37].
In Nigeria, over 50% of children lived more than 2 h away from adequate surgical care for common amenable diseases, leaving many facing disability and increased mortality risk. Inequities in access to surgical services were observed between rural and urban areas, with urban centers like Lagos, Kano, Ibadan, Benin City, Port Harcourt, Jos, Ilorin, and Abuja having better access compared to rural regions. The study suggests several factors contributing to the lack of access to pediatric surgery in Nigeria, including limited resources, cultural beliefs, and lack of availability of pediatric surgeons in rural areas [38].
Overall, these studies emphasize the importance of implementing targeted interventions to address the specific barriers and challenges to healthcare access and reduce mortality rates in children and infants in these countries.
In a study conducted at a pediatric hospital in Uganda (PACU), important barriers to the care of critically ill children were identified through focus groups composed of medical personnel. These barriers included limited resources and staff, training gaps, and challenges with interprofessional teamwork. To address these issues, participants suggested continuous training for all medical providers. PACU faced a shortage of personnel, with only 12 nurses and 2 doctors attending to over 100 children each day. Additionally, it lacked essential equipment and supplies, such as ventilators, monitors, and intravenous fluids. Medical providers in PACU also lacked training in pediatric emergency care, which affected the quality of care provided. The study’s findings highlight the need for interventions to improve pediatric emergency care in Kampala, such as increased funding, adequate training for medical staff, and the promotion of interprofessional teamwork. The Ugandan government should implement training in this area for PACU professionals [39].
In a study across ten major African cities (including Cairo, Lagos, Kinshasa, Luanda, Abidjan, Dar es Salaam, Nairobi, Dakar, Addis Ababa, and Accra), researchers systematically compared child mortality inequalities. While significant disparities exist, the level of inequalities and their trends vary across cities. Factors contributing to these inequalities include socioeconomic conditions, access to healthcare, living standards, and urban infrastructure [40].
In a study conducted in Rwanda, researchers investigated the rapid implementation of rotavirus vaccines and prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) strategies to reduce under-5 mortality. Rwanda outperformed regional peers by adopting these evidence-based interventions swiftly [41].
Infant mortality in the Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center community in Southwest Ethiopia was studied. Factors associated with infant mortality included a lack of antenatal care follow-up, not using soap for handwashing before feeding, the negative perceived benefits of modern treatment, small birth size, and high birth order with short intervals. These determinants can guide evidence-based health interventions to reduce infant deaths [42].
In Bankass, Mali, a cross-sectional survey revealed that living farther from a primary health center, a lower household wealth, a lower reading ability among women, and having access to electricity were associated with higher under-five mortality rates [43].
Basera et al., in a scoping review of the literature on community surveillance and response to maternal and child deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), found that community surveillance is an important tool for identifying and responding to these deaths. However, its implementation faces challenges such as lack of resources, community engagement, and political will. To improve community surveillance programs, strong leadership, clear goals, appropriate methods, and effective communication are suggested. Additionally, civil registration and vital statistics systems are underreporting in most LMICs, affecting the accuracy of reported data. They propose the use of community-based processes for reporting, investigating, and reviewing deaths to increase the official registration of maternal and child deaths and to identify specific factors and barriers associated with maternal and child care [21].
Rojas-Botero et al. designed a list of potentially preventable causes of death for children under five years old in Colombia, finding that 39.5% of these causes were amenable. Deaths were classified into four groups according to their preventability: through vaccination, early diagnosis and treatment, better access to medical care, and other interventions such as improved nutrition and sanitation. In another study analyzing the causes of childhood death, more than 90% of the causes were preventable, with almost 70% being amenable. These studies highlight the importance of implementing measures to reduce morbidity and mortality in children in Colombia, especially in regions with high mortality rates and socioeconomic inequalities. Programs for child care should be strengthened, and access to medical care should be improved [16]. A study by Neethling et al. investigated trends and disparities in amenable mortality in South Africa between 1997 and 2012. The overall amenable mortality rate (ASDR) showed an average annual increase. However, excluding HIV/AIDS deaths revealed a 1.12% annual decrease, highlighting the significant impact of HIV/AIDS on preventable deaths The study estimated that between 2008 and 2012, over 207,810 lives could have been saved annually if all provinces achieved the amenable mortality rate of the Western Cape, the best-performing province. South Africa’s ASDR was considerably higher than the lowest performing European Union (EU) and OECD countries, with rates 2.6 and 2.2 times higher, respectively [44].
Between 2000 and 2015, Peru successfully reduced under-5 mortality (U5M) through several evidence-based interventions (EBIs). Key strategies included focusing on equity, utilizing data for decision-making, cultural sensitivity, and anti-poverty initiatives. The percentage of mothers attending at least four antenatal care visits increased significantly from 69% to 96.9% during this period. The percentage of facility-based deliveries rose from 56% to 91%. Three doses of the tetanus/diphtheria/pertussis vaccine, a key global health indicator, reached 90% by 2015 [45].
In a national study on amenable mortality in Mongolia, it was found that the main causes of death in children under 5 years old were perinatal deaths, influenza, pneumonia, and asthma. These high mortality rates were related to the lack of equipment and medications for the treatment of respiratory diseases, as well as the lack of trained healthcare professionals, especially in rural areas. Improving the quality of medical care and increasing awareness of respiratory disease symptoms among parents is suggested to reduce morbidity and mortality in children in Mongolia [46].
In a follow-up study of live neonates in Malawi, it was found that adequate provision of prenatal and obstetric services in the first trimester of pregnancy was important for reducing maternal and infant mortality. Maternal and paternal education were protective factors for infant mortality but not for neonatal mortality. The study highlights the importance of interventions that improve prenatal care and access to quality medical services to reduce maternal and infant mortality in rural areas [19].
In a qualitative study in the Visakhapatnam district, India, a relatively higher utilization of prenatal care services than the national average was observed. However, home births performed by untrained older women were also high, indicating a quantity-focused approach over quality. Improving accessibility and quality of prenatal care services in rural areas is recommended to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality [47].
In rural Thatta, Pakistan, child gender does not significantly influence household decisions related to health care. Despite differences in mortality ratios, care-seeking behaviors are not gender-biased. Factors like poverty alleviation and girls’ education play a role in child health care [48].
The overall childhood mortality rate in Basrah governorate (Irak) (2008–2013) aligns with international patterns, but infant mortality remains high compared to other countries. Male-specific mortality rates are higher than female rates and the leading causes of childhood death include perinatal issues, bacterial infections, congenital anomalies, accidents, and respiratory diseases [49].
These studies highlight the need for interventions to improve medical care, staff training, access to quality services, and health surveillance to reduce morbidity and mortality in children in various low- and middle-income countries. Strengthening health systems and implementing effective policies are essential to achieve significant improvements in the health outcomes of the pediatric population [47].
3.2. Countries with High Economic Resources
The Republic of Korea has experienced notable progress in increasing its life expectancy in recent decades. According to the World Health Organization, the total life expectancy at birth for the Republic of Korea was 82.7 years in 2018, ranking ninth globally. World Bank data show that life expectancy at birth in the Republic of Korea has increased from 65 years in 1978 to 83.5 years in 2020. This improvement can be attributed to various factors, such as economic development, social well-being, the healthcare system, and lifestyle changes [50]. Yang et al. analyzed the rapid increase in life expectancy in the Republic of Korea from 1960 to 2005 and found that the decline in infant and child mortality, infectious diseases, and cardiovascular diseases contributed to this increase [51]. Bahk and Jung-Choi evaluated the contribution of preventable mortality to the increase in life expectancy in Korea between 1998 and 2017 and discovered that the reduction in preventable mortality accounted for 63.4% of the increase in life expectancy [22]. Eun investigated age–period–cohort trends and their impact on life expectancy at birth due to avoidable, amenable, and preventable deaths in the Republic of Korea between 2000 and 2017, and found that these deaths had a significant negative effect on life expectancy at birth, especially in men [52]. These studies suggest that the Republic of Korea still has the potential to further improve its life expectancy by addressing preventable, amenable, and preventable causes of mortality.
Zylbersztejn et al. found that England had a higher rate of preventable infant mortality than Sweden, especially among children from disadvantaged backgrounds and those born outside the UK. They also identified some modifiable risk factors that contributed to these disparities, such as maternal smoking, low birth weight, and infections. They concluded that improving access to healthcare and social services for vulnerable families could reduce the gap in preventable infant mortality between the two countries. They found that mortality related to respiratory infections and unexpected sudden infant death was 50–60% higher in England than in Sweden, largely explained by the high prevalence of adverse birth characteristics in England [53]. In a retrospective matched cohort study conducted in Sweden, researchers investigated avoidable mortality among parents whose children were placed in care, finding that parents who had a child placed in out-of-home care are at a higher risk of avoidable mortality [54].
In a study comparing child mortality between England and Sweden, researchers focused on potentially preventable causes. They examined respiratory tract infection (RTI)-related deaths and sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI). Adjusted for birth characteristics and socioeconomic factors, England had a higher RTI-related mortality at 31–364 days and 1–4 years, as well as a higher SUDI mortality. Adverse birth characteristics contributed to increased risks in England relative to Sweden [55].
El-Sayed et al. analyzed the role of socioeconomic status and health behaviors in explaining racial disparities in infant mortality by specific causes in Michigan, USA. The authors used data from the Michigan Department of Community Health to compare infant mortality rates by race and cause of death. The main findings of the study were: black infants had higher mortality rates than non-Hispanic white infants for all causes of death, except for congenital anomalies. Maternal education and income were inversely associated with infant mortality for both races, but the effects were stronger for blacks than for whites. Prenatal care was inversely associated with infant mortality for both races, but the effect was weaker for blacks than for whites. Socioeconomic position and health behaviors accounted for 45% of the disparity between whites and blacks in infant mortality due to prematurity, 34% due to sudden infant death syndrome, 29% due to infection, and 20% due to injury. The authors conclude that socioeconomic position and health behaviors are important determinants of racial disparities in infant mortality in Michigan, but they do not fully explain the excess risk among black infants. They suggest that other factors, such as genetic, environmental, and psychosocial influences, may also contribute to the observed disparities [20]. American Indian and Alaska Native infants have an infant mortality rate nearly twice as high as that of non-Hispanic white infants. These infants are 2.7 times more likely to die from accidents before their first birthday compared to non-Hispanic white infants. Additionally, American Indian and Alaska Native infants have a 50% higher likelihood of dying from complications related to low birth weight compared to non-Hispanic white infants [56].
Gianino, M. M. et al. conducted a comprehensive study to examine trends and patterns of amenable infant mortality in 34 OECD countries between 2001 and 2015 in children under 5 years old. In mostly European countries belonging to the OECD, there was a significant decrease in amenable mortality in the group under one year in all countries for all five-year periods analyzed, but a mild decrease in the group from >1 to <4 years.
Rzońca et al. (2020) investigated how Polish Medical Air Rescue crews handle transporting newborns, finding that neonates referred from other health facilities or home, moderate hypothermia at admission, diagnosis of late-onset sepsis, low birthweight, very low birthweight, intrapartum-related complications, or respiratory distress were the factors associated with increased mortality, and the factors associated with decreased mortality were being admitted in 2017 vs. 2014 and older age at admission [57].
The only cause of death that significantly decreased was conditions originating in the early neonatal period for the <1-year group; other causes that contributed to a significant reduction in mortality in some of these countries were septicemia, pneumonia, and nephritis/nephrosis in the USA, septicemia in Poland, and congenital cardiovascular anomalies in Japan and Spain. The results showed that amenable infant mortality decreased in all OECD countries, but at different rates and with different patterns. The authors identified four groups of countries: Group 1 (low and stable amenable infant mortality), Group 2 (low and declining amenable infant mortality), Group 3 (high and declining amenable infant mortality), and Group 4 (high and stable amenable infant mortality). The authors suggest that there were possible factors that influenced variations in amenable infant mortality between countries and groups, such as health system performance, socioeconomic conditions, health policies, and cultural factors [58].
Viner et al., in a systematic review, found that the United Kingdom, between 1970 and 2010, had a small reduction in mortality from non-communicable diseases and injuries compared to countries in the EU15+. They found that the UK has not matched the advances achieved in mortality for the general population compared to other EU15+ countries in 40 years from 1970 to 2010, particularly for deaths in children under 5 years from non-communicable diseases. They recommend identifying and addressing social determinants and health system factors that lead to poor health outcomes for infants and children with chronic diseases [59]. Another study, using data from the WHO World Mortality Database of 2019 and Global Burden of Disease mortality, concluded that mortality rates in the UK among children from amenable causes of death were higher than most countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [60]. Likewise, in a comparative study of mortality in children under 5 years in the UK and Sweden, mortality rates were calculated for both countries at 5 and 3 per 1000 births, respectively. UK-born Pakistani babies experience a high perinatal and neonatal mortality rate. The primary cause is a significant occurrence of lethal malformations, particularly in the offspring of consanguineous parents. Additionally, socioeconomic factors contribute to the excess mortality [61].
In an ambispective study of mortality in children under 5 years conducted at a hospital in Port Moresby (Australia), 150 deaths (67%) were classified as amenable but inevitable causes, 18 (8%) as non-amenable causes, 22 (10%) as indeterminate causes, and 34 (15%) as preventable causes. The researchers recommended the following measures to reduce mortality: improving the accuracy and effectiveness of triage, providing adequate levels of staff, and space for beds [62]. Korda and Butler, using mortality data from individual records, found that the perinatal mortality rate in Australia for 1968–2001 decreased from 12 to 4 deaths per 100,000 [63].
According to a study, racial/ethnic disparities in childhood and adolescent cancer survival vary by cancer type, as indicated by relative survival rates (RSR), which are a marker of susceptibility to medical intervention. The study found that compared to non-Hispanic white children and adolescents, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children and adolescents (of any race) had a higher risk of death from cancers with high responsiveness (>85% RSR), such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Hodgkin’s lymphoma, compared to cancers with low susceptibility (<70% RSR), such as brain and central nervous system tumors and neuroblastoma. The authors suggested that this disparity may be associated with differences in access to care, quality of care, treatment adherence, and tumor biology. The study highlighted the need for further research to identify and address the underlying causes of these disparities and improve outcomes for racial/ethnic minority children and adolescents with cancer [64]. Furthermore, these disparities are observed globally: a global study found that in 2012, a child living in one of the 25 poorest countries in the world who was diagnosed with leukemia had approximately a 10% chance of survival, while in Canada, the figure was close to 90% [65].
In a follow-up study of a cohort of Scottish children with intellectual disabilities, it was found that the most frequent underlying causes of mortality were diseases of the nervous system, followed by congenital anomalies; the most common contributing causes were diseases of the nervous system, followed by the respiratory system; the most common specific contributing causes were cerebral palsy, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and epilepsy. Students with intellectual disabilities were much more likely to die than their peers and had a different pattern of causes, including amenable deaths in a wide range of disease categories. Actions were recommended to reduce amenable deaths, such as those related to epilepsy, dysphagia, and cardiovascular diseases, and to support families of children with conditions that limit quality of life [66].
Hiam et al. argue that the British government’s decision in 2018 to reduce healthcare services for children of undocumented immigrants “should be suspended, at least until a comprehensive consultation and assessment of the health impact” can be carried out, and they call for a more humane and evidence-based approach to immigration policy. The authors argue that this policy violates confidentiality and trust between patients and healthcare professionals and presents serious risks to individual and public health [67].
Silwal et al. examined the characteristics of amenable mortality in the general population. A total of 2% of deaths in the total population were in children under 5 years old. Pacific peoples, Maori, and those living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas demonstrated a higher risk of amenable mortality [68].
Between 1998 and 2014, perinatal mortality was higher in Curacao than in Aruba and the Netherlands. Curacao also recorded a maternal mortality rate three times higher than Aruba. This suggests that the effectiveness of maternal and child care is unsatisfactory in Curacao. One important reason for Curacao’s poorer outcomes could be the fragmented organization of perinatal care services, with midwives providing services at the maternity clinic and gynecologists in private practices, while the main hospital is located several kilometers away. In Aruba, on the other hand, midwives and gynecologists work closely together at the main hospital. Overall, the information about healthcare in the Dutch Caribbean suggests that the excess amenable mortality in perinatal deaths in the Dutch Caribbean, at least in part, reflects differences in the effectiveness of healthcare in the Dutch Caribbean and the Netherlands [69].
3.3. Avoidable (and Amenable) Mortality and COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic represented a disruptive moment in contemporary human society. During the years 2020 and 2021, and part of 2022, governments and healthcare systems responded in unprecedented ways to limit the spread of COVID-19, avoid healthcare collapse, and reduce mortality. In May 2020, Roberton et al. quantified an excess of 250,000 child deaths in LMICs using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST), under three different scenarios, and calculated that 64% of them would be amenable deaths [70]. Global organizations have called for routine healthcare services to be maintained during the pandemic; however, the possible indirect effects on mortality due to the disruption of maternal and child health services have not been quantified. While mortality rates from COVID-19 appear to be low in children and women of reproductive age, these groups could be disproportionately affected by the disruption of routine healthcare services, particularly in LMICs.
4. Discussion
In most of the studies analyzed, treatable mortality in children under 5 years of age had a decreasing trend. However, in some of the studies, regional and even city-based differences were found in treatable mortality in children under 5 years of age [71]. It is suggested that these high heterogeneities in access to maternal and child health services are more common than is currently supported by the evidence. Various authors have reported large regional disparities in amenable mortality, but with a faster decline over time than mortality from all causes and/or non-treatable causes [72,73]. In some research, inequalities were particularly pronounced for infectious diseases and conditions requiring acute care [35,36,46,74].
The availability of health services at the territorial level and the possibilities and difficulties of effective access to health services, among others, were a constant in most studies of amenable mortality conducted in low- and middle-income countries [26,27,28,29,38,75,76]; but mortality is decreasing at a slower pace than expected in the Millennium Development Goals. However, although the Millennium Development Goal for 2015 to halve the mortality rates was achieved, mortality rates among children under 5 years old are unacceptably high, especially considering that the majority of these deaths can be prevented or treated [77,78].
While neonatal mortality in high-resource countries is generally due to non-preventable causes, most neonatal deaths in low-resource areas occur from preventable causes and amenable diseases, including birth-related complications, prematurity, and infections [37].
Neither avoidable nor preventable mortality should be considered as singular or isolated indicators of health system performance. Instead, they should be used in combination with other data sources to gain a better understanding of where problems and possible solutions may lie within health systems. Both are useful indicators for evaluating the performance and effectiveness of public health policies and medical care in reducing premature deaths from various diseases and injuries. However, they are not definitive measures of health system performance, as many factors influence the occurrence and preventability of deaths, such as socioeconomic conditions, lifestyle choices, environmental factors, and the quality and comparability of data. The summary of available evidence will inform health policymakers and stakeholders about which factors need to be addressed to reduce amenable mortality in children under 5 years old.
4.1. Strengths and Limitations of This Study
This is the first study analyzing the results of amenable mortality studies in children under 5 years old. One major limitation encountered was the scarcity of studies analyzing amenable mortality in children under 5 years old compared to studies conducted in the general population. Our study shares the same limitations as other studies that rely on secondary data. Furthermore, international comparisons of mortality rates are complicated by the varying methods countries use to classify preterm infants near the viability threshold. Given these challenges, our study focuses solely on assessing the trend of amenable mortality rates, without conducting a comparative analysis. Amenable mortality was disaggregated by country and regions where possible, considering socioeconomic characteristics that sometimes use different records and indicators for health measurements. Most of the included articles analyzed secondary sources of mortality data, which may suffer from underreporting issues and low data quality, especially in countries with weakened healthcare systems due to a shortage of trained personnel, low investment, and limited hospital capacity. In some instances, making comparisons between countries was challenging due to variations in birth registration laws, death certification practices, and the limited availability of specific ICD-10 amenable mortality lists for children under 5 years old. Few studies examined the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare system overload and how it affected the provision of health services to mothers and children [78,79,80,81,82].
4.2. Practical Applications
The findings of this study highlight the importance of focusing on reducing amenable mortality in children under 5 years old. Efforts should be directed towards addressing preventable causes of death and improving access to timely and effective healthcare, especially in low-resource settings. This includes investing in strengthening healthcare systems across countries to improve access to quality pediatric care, including emergency and critical care services; ensuring adequate staffing with qualified pediatricians and pediatric nurses; implementing the best practices in preventive care for children, including well-child visits and immunizations; increasing access to Improve Antenatal Care (ANC) services within the community, potentially through mobile clinics or outreach programs; emphasizing the importance of attending regular ANC checkups to educate mothers about the benefits for both mother and baby; and providing access to family planning services and education to promote optimal birth spacing, which can improve infant health outcomes.
Offering accessible genetic counseling and carrier screening programs to immigrant families, particularly those with a family history of certain genetic disorders, can help couples make informed reproductive choices and potentially reduce the risk of lethal malformations.
Efforts should also be made to invest in improving access to quality healthcare, particularly for underserved communities or those facing higher amenable mortality rates. This implies expanding primary care services and access to specialists, improving emergency and critical care services, and addressing potential resource disparities between regions or socioeconomic groups.
Countries should prioritize expanding access to primary care services, particularly in underserved areas; building new clinics and healthcare facilities; increasing the number of healthcare professionals, especially primary care physicians; and utilizing telehealth and mobile clinics to reach remote populations.
Governments and organizations should allocate resources strategically to regions with high amenable mortality rates and implement targeted interventions to improve healthcare services for vulnerable populations. Additionally, the establishment of specific ICD-10 amenable mortality lists for children under 5 years old in each country could facilitate a better comparative analysis and help with tracking progress in reducing amenable deaths. It is also essential for healthcare systems to address the impact of public health emergencies, like the COVID-19 pandemic, on maternal and child healthcare provisions to ensure continuity of care and prevent further increases in amenable mortality [83,84].
5. Conclusions
This review highlights the critical need to address under-five mortality through a multifaceted approach targeting both prevention and treatment strategies: Implementing evidence-based interventions to decrease premature births remains a cornerstone of under-five mortality reduction, and strengthening the diagnosis and treatment of children with curable infections like pneumonia, diarrhea, malaria, and sepsis is essential, particularly in resource-limited settings. The strategic allocation of resources towards high-burden regions and vulnerable populations can also significantly improve access to quality healthcare in critical situations. Closing the gap in healthcare access and tackling the social factors that create health disparities is essential.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.N.-J. and P.S.-H.; investigation, E.N.-J.; writing—original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, all authors; supervision, M.J.-M. and P.S.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- The World Bank. Universal Health Coverage as a Sustainable Development Goal. 2023. Available online: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/stories/universal-health-coverage-as-a-sustainable-development-goal.html (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Barredo, L.; Agyepong, I.; Liu, G.; Reddy, S. Objetivo 3—Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y un 2030 Más Saludable. Available online: https://www.un.org/es/chronicle/article/objetivo-3-los-objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible-y-un-2030-mas-saludable (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- The Global Heatlh Observatory. Child Mortality and Causes of Death. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/child-mortality-and-causes-of-death#:~:text=Since1990%2Ctheglobalunder,to2.3millionin2021 (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Wang, H.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abera, S.F.; Abraha, H.N.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Abu-Rmeileh, N.M.E.; et al. Global, regional, and national under-5 mortality, adult mortality, age-specific mortality, and life expectancy, 1970–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1084–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petrou, S.; Fraser, J.; Sidebotham, P. Child death in high-income countries. Lancet 2014, 384, 831–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Children: Improving Survival and Well-Being. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality (accessed on 26 January 2021).
- Rojas-Botero, M.; Fernández, J.A.; Borrero-Martinez, Y. Trends of inequalities of avoidable mortality among children in Colombia: A group-based trajectory analysis. Res. Sq. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houweling, T.A.J.; Kunst, A.E. Socio-economic inequalities in childhood mortality in low- and middle-income countries: A review of the international evidence. Br. Med. Bull. 2010, 93, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutstein, D.D.; Berenberg, W.; Chalmers, T.C.; Child, C.G.; Fishman, A.P.; Perrin, E.B.; Feldman, J.J.; Leaverton, P.E.; Lane, J.M.; Sencer, D.J.; et al. Measuring the Quality of Medical Care. N. Engl. J. Med. 1976, 294, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardona, M.; Millward, J.; Gemmill, A.; Jison Yoo, K.; Bishai, D.M. Estimated impact of the 2020 economic downturn on under-5 mortality for 129 countries. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano, R.; Fullman, N.; Mumford, J.E.; Knight, M.; Barthelemy, C.M.; Abbafati; Abbastabar, H.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdollahi, M.; Abedi, A.; et al. Measuring universal health coverage based on an index of effective coverage of health services in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1250–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobias, M.; Yeh, L.-C. How much does health care contribute to health gain and to health inequality? Trends in amenable mortality in New Zealand 1981–2004. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2009, 33, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- OECD. Avoidable Mortality: OECD/Eurostat Lists of Preventable and Treatable Causes of Death (October 2021 Version). 2021. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Avoidable-mortality-2019-Joint-OECD-Eurostat-List-preventable-treatable-causes-of-death.pdf (accessed on 30 March 2024).
- Paho. Potentially Avoidable Premature Mortality: What Is It and Why Is It Relevant? 2021. Available online: https://hia.paho.org/en/potentially-avoidable-premature-mortality-what-it-and-why-it-relevant (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Kossarova, L.; Holland, W.; Nolte, E.; McKee, M. Measuring ‘Avoidable’ Mortality: Methodological Note. 2009. Available online: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46390/ (accessed on 30 March 2024).
- Rojas-Botero, M.L.; Borrero-Ramírez, Y.E.; Cáceres-Manrique, F.d.M. Lista de causas de muerte potencialmente evitables en la niñez: Una propuesta para Colombia. Cad. Saude Publica 2020, 36, e00086519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Organización Mundial de la Salud. Mortalidad Prematura Potencialmente Evitable: ¿Qué es y por qué es relevante? 2021. Available online: https://hia.paho.org/es/mppe-por-que-relevante (accessed on 30 March 2024).
- Kruk, M.E.; Gage, A.D.; Joseph, N.T.; Danaei, G.; García-Saisó, S.; Salomon, J.A. Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: A systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries. Lancet 2018, 392, 2203–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yirgu, R.; Molla, M.; Sibley, L. Determinants of neonatal mortality in rural Northern Ethiopia: A population based nested case control study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sayed, A.M.; Finkton, D.W.; Paczkowski, M.; Keyes, K.M.; Galea, S. Socioeconomic position, health behaviors, and racial disparities in cause-specific infant mortality in Michigan, USA. Prev. Med. 2015, 76, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayley, O.; Chapota, H.; Kainja, E.; Phiri, T.; Gondwe, C.; King, C.; Nambiar, B.; Mwansambo, C.; Kazembe, P.; Costello, A.; et al. Community-linked maternal death review (CLMDR) to measure and prevent maternal mortality: A pilot study in rural Malawi. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e007753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bahk, J.; Jung-Choi, K. The Contribution of Avoidable Mortality to the Life Expectancy Gains in Korea between 1998 and 2017. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truche, P.; Botelho, F.; Bowder, A.N.; Levis, A.W.; Greenberg, S.L.M.; Smith, E.; Corlew, S.; Bickler, S.; Rice, H.E.; Ameh, E.A.; et al. Potentially Avertable Child Mortality Associated with Surgical Workforce Scale-up in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Global Study. World J. Surg. 2021, 45, 2643–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alvarez, J.-A.; Aburto, J.M.; Canudas-Romo, V. Latin American convergence and divergence towards the mortality profiles of developed countries. Popul. Stud. 2020, 74, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aburto, J.M.; Riffe, T.; Canudas-Romo, V. Trends in avoidable mortality over the life course in Mexico, 1990–2015: A cross-sectional demographic analysis. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e022350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hone, T.; Rasella, D.; Barreto, M.; Atun, R.; Majeed, A.; Millett, C. Large Reductions In Amenable Mortality Associated with Brazil’s Primary Care Expansion And Strong Health Governance. Health Aff. 2017, 36, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aquino, R.; de Oliveira, N.F.; Barreto, M.L. Impact of the Family Health Program on Infant Mortality in Brazilian Municipalities. Am. J. Public Health 2009, 99, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasella, D.; Aquino, R.; Barreto, M.L. Impact of the Family Health Program on the quality of vital information and reduction of child unattended deaths in Brazil: An ecological longitudinal study. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hone, T.; Rasella, D.; Barreto, M.L.; Majeed, A.; Millett, C. Association between expansion of primary healthcare and racial inequalities in mortality amenable to primary care in Brazil: A national longitudinal analysis. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitchon, R.R.; Alvim, C.G.; de Andrade, C.R.; Lasmar, L.M.d.L.B.F.; Cruz, Á.A.; dos Reis, A.P. Asthma mortality in children and adolescents of Brazil over a 20-year period. J. Pediatr. 2020, 96, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Victora, C.G.; Barros, F.C. Infant mortality due to perinatal causes in Brazil: Trends, regional patterns and possible interventions. Sao Paulo Med. J. 2001, 119, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Assis, H.M.; Machado, C.J.; Rodrigues, R.N. Perfis de mortalidade neonatal precoce: Um estudo para uma Maternidade Pública de Belo Horizonte (MG), 2001–2006. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2008, 11, 675–686. Available online: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-790X2008000400014&lang=es (accessed on 30 March 2024). [CrossRef]
- Mason, L.; Dellicour, S.; Ter Kuile, F.; Ouma, P.; Phillips-Howard, P.; Were, F.; Laserson, K.; Desai, M. Barriers and facilitators to antenatal and delivery care in western Kenya: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carshon-Marsh, R.; Aimone, A.; Ansumana, R.; IB, S.; Assalif, A.; Musa, A.; Meh, C.; Smart, F.; Fu, S.H.; Newcombe, L.; et al. Child, maternal, and adult mortality in Sierra Leone: Nationally representative mortality survey 2018–2020. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 10, e114–e123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Njuma Libwea, J.; Bebey Kingue, S.R.; Taku Ashukem, N.; Kobela, M.; Boula, A.; Sinata, K.-S.; Koki Ndombo, P. Assessing the causes of under-five mortality and proportion associated with pneumococcal diseases in Cameroon. A case-finding retrospective observational study: 2006–2012. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deribew, A.; Tessema, F.; Girma, B. Determinants of under-five mortality in Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2007, 21. Available online: https://ejhd.org/index.php/ejhd/article/view/539/400 (accessed on 30 March 2024).
- Cavallin, F.; Bonasia, T.; Yimer, D.A.; Manenti, F.; Putoto, G.; Trevisanuto, D. Risk factors for mortality among neonates admitted to a special care unit in a low-resource setting. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd salam El Vilaly, M.; Jones, M.A.; Stankey, M.C.; Seyi-Olajide, J.; Onajin-Obembe, B.; Dasogot, A.; Klug, S.J.; Meara, J.G.; Ameh, E.A.; Osagie, O.O.; et al. Access to paediatric surgery: The geography of inequality in Nigeria. BMJ Glob. Health 2021, 6, e006025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, B.; Mupere, E.; Irarrázaval, B.; RO, O.; Aanyu-Tukamuhebwa, H.; CB, B.; Gingo, D.; NW, G. Qualitative needs assessment for paediatric emergency care in Kampala, Uganda. Afr. J. Emerg. Med. Rev. Afr. Med. d’urgence 2021, 11, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bado, A.R.; Appunni, S.S. Decomposing wealth-based inequalities in under-five mortality in West Africa. Iran. J. Public Health 2015, 44, 920. [Google Scholar]
- Sayinzoga, F.; Hirschhorn, L.R.; Ntawukuriryayo, J.T.; Beyer, C.; Donahoe, K.B.; Binagwaho, A. Understanding rapid implementation from discovery to scale: Rwanda’s implementation of rotavirus vaccines and PMTCT in the quest to reduce under-5 mortality. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 23, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dube, L.; Taha, M.; Asefa, H. Determinants of infant mortality in community of Gilgel Gibe Field Research Center, Southwest Ethiopia: A matched case control study. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boettiger, D.C.; Treleaven, E.; Kayentao, K.; Guindo, M.; Coumare, M.; Johnson, A.D.; Whidden, C.; Kone, N.; Cisse, A.B.; Padian, N.; et al. Household factors and under-five mortality in Bankass, Mali: Results from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neethling, I.; Groenewald, Ρ.; Schneider, H.; Bradshaw, D. Trends and inequities in amenable mortality between 1997 and 2012 in South Africa. SAMJ South African Med. J. 2019, 109, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, P.J.; Williams, A.L.; Carcamo, M.H.; VanderZanden, A.; Binagwaho, A. Lessons from Peru to reduce under-5 mortality: Understanding program implementation and context. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 23, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surenjav, E.; Sovd, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Yamamoto, E.; Reyer, J.A.; Hamajima, N. Trends in amenable mortality rate in the Mongolian population, 2007–2014. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 2016, 78, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Varma, G.R.; Kusuma, Y.S.; Babu, B. V Antenatal care service utilization in tribal and rural areas in a South Indian district: An evaluation through mixed methods approach. J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. 2011, 86, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nuruddin, R.; Hadden, W.C.; Petersen, M.R.; Lim, M.K. Does child gender determine household decision for health care in rural Thatta, Pakistan? J. Public Health 2009, 31, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, O.S.; Warid, S.A. Mortality among children in Basrah. Med. J. Basrah Univ. 2015, 33, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The World Bank. Life Expectancy at Birth, Total (Years)—Korea, Rep. 2023. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=KR (accessed on 21 April 2024).
- Yang, S.; Khang, Y.-H.; Harper, S.; Davey Smith, G.; Leon, D.A.; Lynch, J. Understanding the Rapid Increase in Life Expectancy in South Korea. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eun, S.J. Avoidable, amenable, and preventable mortalities in South Korea, 2000–2017: Age-period-cohort trends and impact on life expectancy at birth. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 237, 112482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zylbersztejn, A.; Gilbert, R.; Hjern, A.; Hardelid, P. Origins of disparities in preventable child mortality in England and Sweden: A birth cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. 2020, 105, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wall-Wieler, E.; Vinnerljung, B.; Liu, C.; Roos, L.L.; Hjern, A. Avoidable mortality among parents whose children were placed in care in Sweden: A population-based study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2018, 72, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zylbersztejn, A.; Gilbert, R.; Hjern, A.; Hardelid, P. A comparison of child mortality from potentially preventable causes in England and Sweden using birth cohorts from linked administrative datasets. Int. J. Popul. Data Sci. 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhoades, E.R.; Brenneman, G.; Lyle, J.; Handler, A. Mortality of American Indian and Alaska native infants. Annu. Rev. Public Health 1992, 13, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rzońca, E.; Świeżewski, S.P.; Gałązkowski, R.; Bień, A.; Kosowski, A.; Leszczyński, P.; Rzońca, P. Neonatal Transport in the Practice of the Crews of the Polish Medical Air Rescue: A Retrospective Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gianino, M.M.; Lenzi, J.; Bonaudo, M.; Fantini, M.P.; Siliquini, R.; Ricciardi, W.; Damiani, G. Patterns of amenable child mortality over time in 34 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Evidence from a 15-year time trend analysis (2001–2015). BMJ Open 2019, 9, e027909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viner, R.M.; Hargreaves, D.S.; Coffey, C.; Patton, G.C.; Wolfe, I. Deaths in young people aged 0–24 years in the UK compared with the EU15+ countries, 1970–2008: Analysis of the WHO Mortality Database. Lancet 2014, 384, 880–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, J.L.; Wolfe, I.; Viner, R.M. Cause-specific child and adolescent mortality in the UK and EU15+ countries. Arch. Dis. Child. 2020, 105, 1055–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bundey, S.; Alam, H.; Kaur, A.; Mir, S.; Lancashire, R. Why do UK-born Pakistani babies have high perinatal and neonatal mortality rates? Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 1991, 5, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasi, T.; Vince, J.D.; Mokela, D. Mortality in children admitted to Port Moresby General Hospital: How can we improve our hospital outcomes? P. N. G. Med. J. 2003, 46, 113–124. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16454393 (accessed on 30 March 2024). [PubMed]
- Korda, R.J.; Butler, J.R.G. Effect of healthcare on mortality: Trends in avoidable mortality in Australia and comparisons with Western Europe. Public Health 2006, 120, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delavar, A.; Barnes, J.M.; Wang, X.; Johnson, K.J. Associations Between Race/Ethnicity and US Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Survival by Treatment Amenability. JAMA Pediatr. 2020, 174, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knaul, F.M.; Arreola-Ornelas, H.; Rodriguez, N.M.; Méndez-Carniado, O.; Kwete, X.J.; Puentes-Rosas, E.; Bhadelia, A. Avoidable Mortality: The Core of the Global Cancer Divide. J. Glob. Oncol. 2018, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, G.S.; Fleming, M.; Kinnear, D.; Henderson, A.; Pell, J.P.; Melville, C.; Cooper, S.-A. Rates and causes of mortality among children and young people with and without intellectual disabilities in Scotland: A record linkage cohort study of 796 190 school children. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e034077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiam, L.; Steele, S.; McKee, M. Creating a ‘hostile environment for migrants’: The British government’s use of health service data to restrict immigration is a very bad idea. Health Econ. Policy Law 2018, 13, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silwal, P.; Lopez, M.I.; Pledger, M.; Cumming, J.; Jeffreys, M. Association between enrolment with a Primary Health Care provider and amenable mortality: A national population-based analysis in Aotearoa New Zealand. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0281163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verstraeten, S.P.A.; van Oers, H.A.M.; Mackenbach, J.P. Contribution of amenable mortality to life expectancy differences between the Dutch Caribbean islands of Aruba and Curaçao and the Netherlands. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2020, 44, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberton, T.; Carter, E.D.; Chou, V.B.; Stegmuller, A.R.; Jackson, B.D.; Tam, Y.; Sawadogo-Lewis, T.; Walker, N. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: A modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e901–e908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas-Botero, M.L.; Borrero Ramírez, Y.E.; Cáceres-Manrique, F. de M. Muertes evitables en la niñez: Un análisis por departamento y municipio en Colombia (2000–2018). Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2021, 46, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castelli, A.; Nizalova, O. Avoidable Mortality: What It Means and How It Is Measured. York. 2011. Available online: https://ideas.repec.org/p/chy/respap/63cherp.html (accessed on 30 March 2024).
- Nolte, E.; Mckee, M. Does Health Care Save Lives? Avoidable Mortality Revisited. Nuffield Trust: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Basera, T.J.; Schmitz, K.; Price, J.; Willcox, M.; Bosire, E.N.; Ajuwon, A.; Mbule, M.; Ronan, A.; Burtt, F.; Scheepers, E.; et al. Community surveillance and response to maternal and child deaths in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kazembe, L.; Clarke, A.; Kandala, N.-B. Childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: Cross-sectional insight into small-scale geographical inequalities from Census data. BMJ Open 2012, 2, e001421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quentin, W.; Abosede, O.; Aka, J.; Akweongo, P.; Dinard, K.; Ezeh, A.; Hamed, R.; Kayembe, P.K.; Mitike, G.; Mtei, G.; et al. Inequalities in child mortality in ten major African cities. BMC Med. 2014, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajan, S.; Ricciardi, W.; McKee, M.; McKee, M. The SDGs and health systems: The last step on the long and unfinished journey to universal health care? Eur. J. Public Health 2020, 30, I28–I31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Rodriguez-Besteiro, S.; Cabello-Eras, J.J.; Bustamante-Sanchez, A.; Navarro-Jiménez, E.; Donoso-Gonzalez, M.; Beltrán-Velasco, A.I.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Sustainable Development Goals in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F.; López-Pérez, P.J.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J. Dietary patterns of adolescent students during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Physiol. Behav. 2022, 249, 113764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Beltrán-Velasco, A.I.; Ramos-Campo, D.J.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Nikolaidis, P.A.; Belando, N.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. Physical activity and COVID-19. The basis for an efficient intervention in times of COVID-19 pandemic. Physiol. Behav. 2022, 244, 113667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Bustamante-Sánchez, Á.; Martínez-Guardado, I.; Navarro-Jiménez, E.; Plata-SanJuan, E.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J. Infancy Dietary Patterns, Development, and Health: An Extensive Narrative Review. Children 2022, 9, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F.; López-Pérez, P.J.; Clemente-Suárez, V.J. Gender Differences in Nutritional, Odontological and Psychological Patterns of Adolescent Students during COVID-19 Pandemic. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajekal, M.; Scholes, S.; Love, H.; Hawkins, N.; O’flaherty, M.; Raine, R.; Capewell, S. Analysing Recent Socioeconomic Trends in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in England, 2000–2007: A Population Modelling Study. PLoS Med. 2012, 9, e1001237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nolte, E. Measuring the health of nations: Analysis of mortality amenable to health care. BMJ 2003, 327, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).