Next Article in Journal
Quality Improvement Intervention Decreases Pain and Adverse Events Due to Heel Lances in Infants
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Peripheral and Central Auditory Systems in Children and Adolescents Before and After COVID-19 Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparing Images from Near-Infrared Light Reflection and Bitewing Radiography to Detect Proximal Caries in Primary Teeth

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, P.O. Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2024, 11(12), 1455; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121455
Submission received: 28 October 2024 / Revised: 21 November 2024 / Accepted: 26 November 2024 / Published: 28 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Dentistry & Oral Medicine)

Abstract

Objectives: The present prospective study aimed to compare near-infrared light reflection (NIRI) and bitewing radiographs (BWR) images to detect proximal caries in primary teeth. Methods: 71 children underwent routine BWR, and scans were performed using an intra-oral scanner (iTero Element 5D, Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), including a near-infrared light source (850 nm) and sensor. Five specialist pediatric dentists examined the NIRI and BWR images. Results: The average participant age was 7.8 years. A total of 1004 proximal surfaces of primary molars and canines were examined, 209 carious lesions were detected on BWR, and 227 on NIRI. Comparison between all carious lesions detected on BWR and NIRI: Sensitivity (53.6%); Specificity (85.5%); Positive Predictive Value (PPV) (49.3%); Negative Predictive Value (NPV) (87.5%). Comparison between carious lesions involving the DEJ detected on BWR and at any level in NIRI: Sensitivity (61%); Specificity (83.4%), PPV (36.6%); NPV (93.2%). Comparison between enamel-only carious lesions detected on BWR and all lesions detected using NIRI: Sensitivity (44.8%); Specificity (85.5%); PPV (20.7%); NPV (94.8%). Conclusions: No additional diagnostic information can be gleaned from BWR if initial caries lesions in the enamel are not detected by clinical examination or in images from a NIRI scanner, making BWR unnecessary.
Keywords: NIRI; X-ray; children; detection; proximal caries NIRI; X-ray; children; detection; proximal caries

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shmueli, A.; Fux-Noy, A.; Davidovich, E.; Ram, D.; Moskovitz, M. Comparing Images from Near-Infrared Light Reflection and Bitewing Radiography to Detect Proximal Caries in Primary Teeth. Children 2024, 11, 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121455

AMA Style

Shmueli A, Fux-Noy A, Davidovich E, Ram D, Moskovitz M. Comparing Images from Near-Infrared Light Reflection and Bitewing Radiography to Detect Proximal Caries in Primary Teeth. Children. 2024; 11(12):1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shmueli, Aviv, Avia Fux-Noy, Esti Davidovich, Diana Ram, and Moti Moskovitz. 2024. "Comparing Images from Near-Infrared Light Reflection and Bitewing Radiography to Detect Proximal Caries in Primary Teeth" Children 11, no. 12: 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121455

APA Style

Shmueli, A., Fux-Noy, A., Davidovich, E., Ram, D., & Moskovitz, M. (2024). Comparing Images from Near-Infrared Light Reflection and Bitewing Radiography to Detect Proximal Caries in Primary Teeth. Children, 11(12), 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121455

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop