Next Article in Journal
Does the Dizziness Handicap Inventory—Children and Adolescents (DHI-CA) Demonstrate Properties to Support Clinical Application in the Post-Concussion Population: A Rasch Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Intricate Links between Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy, Mouth Breathing, and Craniofacial Development in Children with Sleep-Disordered Breathing: Unraveling the Vicious Cycle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/children10081427
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Exercise Capacity in Very Low Birth Weight Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Grace Poole
1,
Christopher Harris
1 and
Anne Greenough
2,*
1
Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
2
Department of Women and Children’s Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE5 9RS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(8), 1427; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081427
Submission received: 28 June 2023 / Revised: 31 July 2023 / Accepted: 5 August 2023 / Published: 21 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Orthopedics & Sports Medicine)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is an association between very low birth weight (VLBW) and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adulthood. Aerobic fitness, measured as the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), is a good indicator of cardiopulmonary health and predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Our aim was to determine the effect of birth weight on aerobic exercise capacity and physical activity. We systematically identified studies reporting exercise capacity (VO2 max and VO2 peak) and physical activity levels in participants born at VLBW aged eighteen years or older compared to term-born controls from six databases (MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, CI NAHL, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar). Meta-analysis of eligible studies was conducted using a random effect model. We screened 6202 articles and identified 15 relevant studies, 10 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. VLBW participants had a lower VO2 max compared to their term counterparts (−3.35, 95% CI: −5.23 to −1.47, p = 0.0005), as did VLBW adults who had developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (−6.08, 95% CI −11.26 to −0.90, p = 0.02). Five of nine studies reported significantly reduced self-reported physical activity levels. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated reduced maximal aerobic exercise capacity in adults born at VLBW compared to term-born controls.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 15–20% infants worldwide are born at a low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g) [1]. Since the introduction of neonatal intensive care units, there has been a dramatic improvement in survival rates of very low birth weight infants (VLBW, <1500 g) [2,3]. The increased survival has resulted in a focus on morbidity and mortality of these cohorts in later life.
The impact of preterm birth on multi-organ development can have deleterious effects on the cardiopulmonary system [4,5,6,7]. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has demonstrated structural myocardial changes in adolescents and adults born prematurely which may be associated with reduced functional reserve [4,8]. A study of 102 adults born prematurely demonstrated they had greater left ventricular (LV) mass, smaller internal diameters, and poorer LV strain compared to term-born controls [4]. Mohamed et al. supported those findings reporting smaller LV volumes and reduced LV function in 200 preterm adults [9]. On stress echocardiography, a lower ejection fraction (EF) proportional to exercise intensity was demonstrated [8].
Given the increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors described in prematurely born individuals, it is not surprising that birthweight is inversely proportional to adult morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease [6,10,11]. In 1991, Barker et al. reported diminished airway function in adults born of reduced birthweight and speculated that this may be secondary to poor prenatal nutrition [12]. Subsequent evidence has shown that LBW is associated with excess respiratory morbidity, independent of or secondary to premature birth or in utero growth retardation (small for gestational age—SGA) [7]. Indeed, prematurity and being born SGA are associated with different risk factors, but many prematurely born infants are SGA. Individuals who developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) are particularly at increased risk of chronic respiratory morbidity including an increased requirement for supplementary oxygen following neonatal discharge, more hospital readmissions particularly for respiratory viral infections, and lung function abnormalities persisting even into adulthood. Sadly, such infants may also suffer hearing and visual impairment, feeding difficulties, growth restriction, and chronic kidney disease [13,14].
The impact of preterm birth on multi-organ development can have deleterious effects on the cardiopulmonary system [4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, birthweight has been shown to be inversely proportional to adult morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease [8,9].
Measurement of the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) is considered the gold standard assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness [15]. It has been shown to be a strong predictor of cardiovascular health, morbidity, and mortality [16,17]. A systematic review of studies of maximal aerobic exercise capacity found a 13% reduction in VO2 max in children and adults born prematurely, compared to their term-born counterparts. While the pooled results were significantly different, it was highlighted that the majority of included observational studies showed no significant difference in VO2 max between the two groups [18,19,20]. To our knowledge, no systematic review has exclusively focused on determining whether there was an association between VLBW and maximal aerobic exercise capacity in adults.
As a strong predictor of cardiovascular health, an improvement in VO2 max may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and associated mortality [21]. It is well-established that regular exercise is an effective means of increasing VO2 max [22]. In addition to its important association with VO2 max, physical activity levels are an important independent protective factor for cardiovascular health [23]. Several studies have suggested that prematurely born individuals are less physically active than their term-born peers, independent of whether they had developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and socio-economic confounders during childhood [24,25,26]. However, the evidence is conflicting [27]; the Epicure study did not reveal any significant differences in physical activity levels between school-age children born prematurely and term-born controls when measured using accelerometers. Therefore, the relationship between birth weight and physical activity levels in adulthood would benefit from further clarification.
The evidence, however, is conflicting [19]. A study of 61 children found no significant differences in physical activity levels assessed using an accelerometer [19]. In addition to its important association with VO2 max, physical activity levels are also an independent risk factor that may contribute to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Our primary aim was to undertake a systematic review to evaluate the impact of VLBW on exercise capacity in adults as assessed by VO2 max. Our secondary outcome was to compare self-reported physical activity levels between VLBW and term-born adults and assess whether this impacted on exercise capacity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (accessed on 25 May 2023) as CRD42023429309 [28].
The literature search was conducted according to the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines [29]. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines were used to prepare the manuscript [30].

2.2. Search Strategy

Relevant studies were identified through searching six electronic databases (EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE(R.), Scopus, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) between the 1 March 2023 and 15 March 2023. A repeat search was conducted on the 1 June 2023 to identify any further articles that met inclusion criteria. We also hand-searched references from included articles. Search strategies were based on the Cochrane library Neonatal Search Terms [31].

2.3. Eligibility Criteria

Studies on exercise capacity in adults (defined as greater than 18 years old) born at VLBW compared to term controls with results of VO2 max (mL/kg/min) or VO2 Peak (mL/kg/min) using a treadmill or cycle ergometer were eligible. VO2 max refers to the maximum rate of oxygen consumption attainable during physical exertion. VO2 peak, directly reflective of VO2 max, is the highest value VO2 attained upon incremental or other high-intensity exercise testing [32]. The recruitment of subjects in some papers was based on gestational age, but only those which reported birthweight were included in the review. BPD was defined as either dependence on supplementary oxygen at 28 days of life or dependence on supplementary oxygen at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). Other measures of cardiorespiratory exercise capacity were reviewed (such as anaerobic threshold and minute ventilation), but there were insufficient data for a meta-analysis. Given the authors’ capabilities, studies were restricted to those reported in the English language.
Using pre-agreed inclusion criteria, two independent authors (GP and CH) removed duplicates, screened titles and abstracts of retrieved articles, and obtained full-text articles. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion between the two reviewers until a consensus was achieved.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data extraction was performed by a single reviewer (GP) using a pre-specified data extraction form. A second reviewer (CH) independently checked the accuracy of the first extraction. Study characteristics, sample size, the method of assessing exercise capacity, and reference values were summarised for each study. For each study, VO2 max, VO2 peak, and activity levels were extracted for adults born at VLBW and term-born controls.
To be eligible for meta-analysis, a study had to fulfil the following criteria, defined a priori: an original report on the relation between exercise capacity in adults that were born at VLBW, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for exercise tolerance in at least two strata of birth weight. To assess exercise capacity, we analysed results for VO2 max and VO2 peak. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4 [33].

2.5. Quality Assessment

The risk of bias for each study was assessed by two independent reviewers (GP and CH) using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies [34,35]. Studies were scored across three domains: case selection, comparability, and outcome. Scores across three domains were tabulated to give an overall rating of good, fair, or poor quality. The data extraction for quality was performed by a single reviewer (GP) and three randomly chosen papers were checked for consistency by a second reviewer (CH), with no discrepancies being identified. For cohort studies, we considered that participants lost to follow-up were unlikely to introduce bias if follow-up rates were greater than 80% or between 70% and 80% with an accompanying statement describing those lost to follow up.

3. Results

3.1. Identified Studies and Characteristics

The course of the systematic review is outlined in a PRIMSA 2020 flow diagram (Figure 1). Seven thousand, eight hundred and seven studies were identified through database searching. A total of 1605 duplicates were removed, and 6202 abstracts were screened. Eighty-one full-text articles were screened for eligibility, and the quality of fifteen studies was evaluated [8,24,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. The characteristics of the studies included are summarised in Table 1. From all included studies, there were 1132 VLBW participants, 914 controls, and 75 VLBW who had had BPD. Individuals were born between 1984 and 1998. Participants were assessed at ages 18 to 30 years old [8,24,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].

3.2. VO2 Max in VLBW Infants

Ten studies assessed VO2 max in VLBW adults compared to term-born controls [24,36,37,40,41,43,44].
Three studies undertook a subgroup analysis for VLBW individuals who had BPD, including 75 participants. Table 2 summarises the characteristics and results of the studies included in the analysis. The average weight of VLBW adults at follow-up was 68.85 kg, compared to 73.75 kg in the control group (Student’s t test, p = 0.034). Four studies assessed VO2 max, three of which used a cycle ergometer [8,36,37,46]. Six studies assessed VO2 peak using a combination of cycle ergometry and treadmill exercise protocols [24,40,41,42,43,47].
Meta-analysis indicated that adults born at VLBW had a significantly lower VO2 max/VO2 peak compared to controls (mean difference: −3.35 [95% CI −5.23 to −1.47] mL/kg/min, p = 0.0005) (Figure 2). However, there was high heterogeneity between studies included in the analysis (I2 = 87%). Meta-analysis of studies solely reporting on those who had BPD found they were more likely to have a lower VO2 max (mean difference: −6.08 [95% CI −11.26 to −0.90] mL/kg/min, p = 0.02,) than term-born controls. There were no significant differences in VO2 max between VLBW participants who had BPD and those that did not (p = 0.33).

3.3. Levels of Physical Activity in VLBW Infants

Nine studies from five different countries reported on physical activity levels in VLBW adults compared to controls (Table 3) [8,26,37,38,39,42,44,47]. Three studies followed up individuals from the Helsinki Study of VLBW Adults [39,41,44]. Three studies used the European Community Respiratory Health Survey II to identify adult’s physical activity levels [36,44,47,51]. Five studies did not report on questionnaires or tools utilised to assess physical activity levels [8,24,37,39,42].
Five studies found significant differences in self-reported activity levels in VLBW adults compared to controls [36,39,44,45,47]. In four studies, VLBW adults were less likely to engage in weekly vigorous physical activity [36,44,45,47]. In one study, despite no significant difference in the frequency of exercise, VLBW adults were more likely to engage in less intense physical activity for a shorter duration of time [39]. Four studies found no significant difference in the frequency of physical activity between VLBW and control groups [8,24,37,42]. Due to a difference in measurable outcomes and assessment tools, the results were unsuitable for meta-analysis.

4. Discussion

We have demonstrated that exercise capacity is significantly reduced in adults born at VLBW, independent of whether they had BPD, compared to term born controls. It is important to consider the origin of differences in VO2 max between VLBW adults and TB term-born controls. Maximal aerobic exercise capacity is impacted by age, sex, weight, size, body composition, and physical activity levels. Due to a lack of data reported in individual papers, we were unable to analyse results to determine if there were differences related to sex. A follow-up study of 150 adults born prematurely recruited into the United Kingdom Oscillation Study (UKOS) found males compared to females completed significantly greater distances during shuttle sprint testing and reported exercising more each week [52]. While VO2 max was not assessed in that study, sex differences in the amount of exercise undertaken could potentially impact on VO2 max. Furthermore, in a study of elite endurance athletes, women were found to have a VO2 max 10% lower than their male counterparts [53].
Given the absolute value is highly impacted by body weight, VO2 max and VO2 peak are typically expressed as milliliter/kg/minute. While this enables results to be adjusted for body weight, body composition remains a likely confounder. Eight out of ten included studies reported the participants’ weight [8,24,36,37,40,41,43,46,47]. On pooled analysis, there was a significant difference in the mean weight of adults born at VLBW compared to term-born controls. While impossible to predict based exclusively on weight, BMI is generally well-correlated to percentage body fat [54,55,56]. One study of 25 female athletes aged between 17 and 22 years found a non-significant negative correlation between percentage body fat and VO2 max [57]. Goren et al. demonstrated a strong correlation between fat-free mass (FFM) and VO2 max [58]. This may explain the greater effect size observed in our meta-analysis which focused exclusively on adults compared to the results of Edwards et al. which also included children [18]. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of 433 healthy subjects demonstrated a decline in FFM with age [59]. This emphasises the importance of including anthropometric measurements in studies investigating maximal aerobic exercise capacity in future.
There is a well-established association between physical activity levels and maximal aerobic exercise capacity. Meta-regression and analysis of 28 articles highlighted an increase in VO2 max with physical activity training, independent of the volume and intensity of exercise sessions [60]. Crowley et al. reported in their systematic review that both high and low intensity training when undertaken frequently increased VO2 max [61]. Interestingly, despite adjusting for physical activity levels, Gostelow and Stohr found a significantly lower VO2 max in individuals born at VLBW [19]. In our review, five studies reported that adults born at VLBW exercised less than their term-born counterparts [36,39,44,45,47], whereas four studies found no such association [4,8,24,38]. This highlights the need for further research assessing the relationship of physical activity levels and VO2 max in relation to birth weight. If frequent exercise improves maximal aerobic exercise capacity, an important predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, a pertinent public health strategy would be to target educational interventions and physical activity programs at VLBW adults.
Interestingly, despite adjusting for PA levels, Gostelow and Stohr found a significantly lower VO2 max in individuals born at VLBW [52,53]. There is improvement in maximal aerobic exercise capacity with regular exercise, that PA may be used as a potential intervention [52,53]. This raises a question as to whether VLBW infants should be recommended targeted exercise regimens as a preventative cardiovascular strategy. The physiological mechanisms resulting in reduced maximal aerobic exercise capacity in adults born at VLBW remain poorly understood. Aerobic exercise capacity is determined by the integrative responses of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, in addition to oxygen uptake by skeletal muscles [62]. Several studies have demonstrated that [54]. Our findings support previous research demonstrating a reduced maximal aerobic exercise capacity, independent of prematurity-related perinatal factors such as BPD [40]. Pulmonary gas exchange during exercise, assessed by the alveolar-to-arterial oxygen difference (A-aDO2), is comparable between prematurely born and term-born TB adults during exercise [40,43,63]. It has however been hypothesised that adults born at VLBW may have higher airway resistance and smaller peripheral airways, requiring a greater concentration of oxygen to maintain ventilation respiration during exercise [64]. Follow-up of the UKOS cohort found males born prematurely were more likely to have poorer smaller airway function, however, they performed better on exercise testing compared to their female counterparts, possibly indicating that other factors’ physiological mechanisms may have a greater influence [52]. Adults born prematurely have been shown to have a significantly increased pulmonary arterial pressure during exercise, which may reduce pulmonary blood flow and subsequently VO2 max [64,65]. Physiological mechanisms contributing to a reduced maximal aerobic exercise capacity are multi-factorial and complex, where further research is required to fully understand the impact of birth weight and prematurity.
In addition to a reduced VO2 max, a predictor of increased cardiopulmonary mortality, adults born at VLBW are also at higher risk due to the increased prevalence of hypertension [66], heart failure [67], diabetes [68], and cardiometabolic syndromes [66]. Given this, a more detailed cardiovascular risk assessment in adults known to be born at VLBW may be of benefit. One suggestion is to screen adults born at VLBW in general practice using a risk scoring system, such as the widely utilised QRISK2, to predict individuals 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease [69]. It would be important however to evaluate the financial cost, resource implications, and the most appropriate and effective age-range to target such an intervention.
Furthermore, adults born preterm have been shown to have a significant increase in pulmonary arterial pressure during exercise, which may reduce pulmonary blood flow and subsequently VO2 max [59,60]. Physiological mechanisms contributing to the observed reduction in maximal aerobic exercise capacity are multi-factorial and it is clear further research is required to fully understand the impact of birth weight and prematurity.
Adults born at VLBW are at a higher risk of hypertension [61], heart failure [62], diabetes [63], and cardiometabolic syndromes [61]. Interestingly, despite a greater prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, an association with ischemic heart disease remains inconclusive [64,65]. An increased relative-risk of all-cause mortality in adults born prematurely, however, is well-established [66]. A more detailed cardiovascular health assessment in adults known to be born at VLBW may be of benefit, but evaluation of the efficacy and resource implications of adult-targeted interventions would be important. Studies such as the trial of exercise to prevent hypertension in young adults are therefore very welcome, even though only 38.7% of those born prematurely were born at less than 32 weeks of gestation [70].
Despite our efforts to generate a precise effect of being born at VLBW on maximal aerobic exercise capacity, our review has some limitations. On analysis, there was a high proportion of heterogeneity between studies reporting maximal aerobic exercise capacity. In part, this may be secondary to our decision to include studies reporting VO2 peak and VO2 max, however, prior studies have shown that VO2 peak is reflective of VO2 max [32]. The heterogeneity is possibly attributable to different methodologies and protocols used between studies to estimate maximal aerobic exercise capacity. Eight studies utilised cycle ergometry [8,36,37,39,41,44,46,47] whereas two studies utilised a treadmill [24,27]. While studies utilising a treadmill demonstrated comparable results to those using a cycle ergometer in this review, prior studies have commented on lower values of VO2 max using cycle ergometry when intra-subject comparisons of both methods were utilised in the same study [71,72]. While challenging, this perhaps highlights a need to standardise methodology and protocols utilised to measure maximal aerobic exercise capacity.
All participants included in the meta-analysis were between their second and third decade of life, a period well-established to correlate to peak maximal aerobic exercise capacity. Generally, it is estimated that VO2 max declines 10% per decade after the age of 25 years and 15% between the ages of 50 and 75 [73,74,75]. Most studies included in our meta-analysis followed up participants in their third decade of life, with latter follow-up. It will be interesting to observe the impact of age on differences in VO2 max between adults born at VLBW and at term.
Due to differences in outcome measures between studies, a meta-analysis could not be performed to assess self-reported physical activity levels in adults born at VLBW. Given the correlation between physical activity levels and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, in addition to the possibility of reduced activity levels in adults born at VLBW, standardisation of outcome measures between studies is of vital importance. In studies evaluating maximal aerobic exercise capacity and physical activity levels, it is important to critically evaluate participant recruitment given the high risk of recruitment bias associated with exercise-based studies [76].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, maximal aerobic exercise capacity was significantly reduced in adults born at VLBW compared to term-born controls. Given the relationship between exercise capacity and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, this could have significant implications for individuals’ long-term health. The variability in outcome measures assessing physical activity meant it was difficult to accurately assess the association with birthweight. We recommend a standardised approach of assessing physical activity levels for future studies, such as the European Respiratory Health Community Questionnaire II or Metabolic Equivalent of a Task levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P. and A.G.; methodology, G.P.; validation, C.H.; formal analysis, G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P.; writing—review and editing, A.G.; visualization, G.P.; supervision, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the work of Deidre Gibbons in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Nutrition Targets 2025. Low Birth Weight Policy Brief. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-14.5 (accessed on 17 October 2014).
  2. Jeschke, E.; Biermann, A.; Günster, C.; Böhler, T.; Heller, G.; Hummler, H.D.; Bührer, C. Mortality and major morbidity of very-low-birth-weight infants in Germany 2008-2012: A report based on administrative data. Front. Pediatr. 2016, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cartlidge, P.H.; Stewart, J.H. Survival of very low birthweight and very preterm infants in a geographically defined population. Acta Paediatr. 1997, 86, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lewandowski, A.J.; Augustine, D.; Lamata, P.; Davis, E.F.; Lazdam, M.; Francis, J.; McCormick, K.; Wilkinson, A.R.; Singhal, A.; Lucas, A.; et al. Preterm heart in adult life cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals distinct differences in left ventricular mass, geometry, and function. Circulation 2013, 127, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lewandowski, A.J.; Bradlow, W.M.; Augustine, D.; Davis, E.F.; Francis, J.; Singhal, A.; Lucas, A.; Neubauer, S.; McCormick, K.; Leeson, P. Right ventricular systolic dysfunction in young adults born preterm. Circulation 2013, 128, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Raisi-Estabragh, Z.; Cooper, J.; Bethell, M.S.; McCracken, C.; Lewandowski, A.J.; Leeson, P.; Neubauer, S.; Harvey, N.C.; Petersen, S.E. Lower birth weight is linked to poorer cardiovascular health in middle-aged population-based adults. Heart 2023, 109, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Greenough, A. Does low birth weight confer a lifelong respiratory disadvantage? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 180, 107–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huckstep, O.; Williamson, W.; Telles, F.; Burchert, H.; Bertagnolli, M.; Herdman, C.; Arnold, L.; Smillie, R.; Mohamed, A.; Boardman, H.; et al. Physiological stress elicits impaired left ventricular function in preterm-born adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohamed, A.; Marciniak, M.; Williamson, W.; Huckstep, O.J.; Lapidaire, W.; McCance, A.; Neubauer, S.; Leeson, P.; Lewandowski, A.J. Association of systolic blood pressure elevation with disproportionate left ventricular remodeling in very preterm-born young adults: The preterm heart and elevated blood pressure. JAMA Cardiol. 2021, 6, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Risnes, K.R.; Vatten, L.J.; Baker, J.L.; Jameson, K.; Sovio, U.; Kajantie, E.; Osler, M.; Morley, R.; Jokela, M.; Painter, R.C.; et al. Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 40, 647–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.X.; Li, Y.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Florio, A.A.; Shan, Z.; Wang, S.; Manson, J.A.; Mukamal, K.J.; Rimm, E.B.; Chavarro, J.E. Associations of birth weight and later life lifestyle factors with risk of cardiovascular disease in the USA: A prospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2022, 51, 101570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barker, D.J.P.; Godfrey, K.M.; Fall, C.; Osmond, C.; Winter, P.D.; Shaheen, S.O. Relation of birth weight and childhood respiratory infection to adult lung function and death from chronic obstructive airways disease. Br. Med. J. 1991, 303, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dyson, A.; Kent, A.L. The effect of preterm birth on renal development and renal health outcome. Neoreviews 2019, 20, e725–e736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bonadies, L.; Cavicchiolo, M.E.; Priante, E.; Moschino, L.; Baraldi, E. Prematurity and BPD: What general practitioners should know. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2023, 182, 1505–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hill, A.V.; Lupton, H. Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilization of oxygen. QJM 1923, 16, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bye, A.; Røsjø, H.; Aspenes, S.T.; Condorelli, G.; Omland, T.; Wisløff, U. Circulating MicroRNAs and Aerobic Fitness—The HUNT-Study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Harber, M.P.; Kaminsky, L.A.; Arena, R.; Blair, S.N.; Franklin, B.A.; Myers, J.; Ross, R. Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on all-cause and disease-specific mortality: Advances since 2009. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 60, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Edwards, M.O.; Kotecha, S.J.; Lowe, J.; Watkins, W.J.; Henderson, A.J.; Kotecha, S. Effect of preterm birth on exercise capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2015, 50, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gostelow, T.; Stöhr, E.J. The effect of preterm birth on maximal aerobic exercise capacity and lung function in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2022, 52, 2627–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agusti, A.; Faner, R. Lung function trajectories in health and disease. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Myers, J.; Prakash, M.; Froelicher, V.; Do, D.; Partington, S.; Atwood, J.E. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. di Prampero, P.E. Factors limiting maximal performance in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 90, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nystoriak, M.A.; Bhatnagar, A. Cardiovascular effects and benefits of exercise. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 5, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Clemm, H.H.; Vollsæter, M.; Røksund, O.D.; Eide, G.E.; Markestad, T.; Halvorsen, T. Exercise capacity after extremely preterm birth: Development from adolescence to adulthood. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014, 11, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kajantie, E.; Strang-Karlsson, S.; Hovi, P.; Räikkönen, K.; Pesonen, A.K.; Heinonen, K.; Järvenpää, A.L.; Eriksson, J.G.; Andersson, S. Adults born at very low birth weight exercise less than their peers born at term. J. Pediatr. 2010, 157, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Engan, M.; Vollsæter, M.; Øymar, K.; Markestad, T.; Eide, G.E.; Halvorsen, T.; Juliusson, P.; Clemm, H. Comparison of physical activity and body composition in a cohort of children born extremely preterm or with extremely low birth weight to matched term-born controls: A follow-up study. BMJ Paediatr. Open 2019, 3, e000481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Welsh, L.; Kirkby, J.; Lum, S.; Odendaal, D.; Marlow, N.; Derrick, G.; Stocks, J. The EPICure study: Maximal exercise and physical activity in school children born extremely preterm. Thorax 2010, 65, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. University of York, National Institute for Health and Care Research (2023). PROSPERO. Available online: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (accessed on 22 June 2023).
  29. Brooke, B.S.; Schwartz, T.A.; Pawlik, T.M. MOOSE reporting guidelines for meta-analyses of observational studies. JAMA Surg. 2021, 156, 787–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stewart, L.A.; Clarke, M.; Rovers, M.; Riley, R.D.; Simmonds, M.; Stewart, G.; Tierney, J.F. PRISMA-IPD Development Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses of individual participant data: The PRISMA-IPD Statement. JAMA 2015, 313, 1657–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. The Cochrane Collaberation. Literature Search Filters for Neonatal Reviews. 2023. Available online: https://neonatal.cochrane.org/Literature-Search-Filters-for-Neonatal-Reviews (accessed on 26 June 2023).
  32. Whipp, B.J.; Ward, S.A. Physiological determinants of pulmonary gas exchange kinetics during exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1990, 22, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Review Manager Web (RevMan Web). Version (5.4). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available online: Revman.cochrane.org (accessed on 1 August 2023).
  34. Wells, G.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment form for Cohort Studies; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sidwell, K. Newcastle—Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale Case Control Studies. Available online: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nosgen.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  36. Vrijlandt, E.J.; Gerritsen, J.; Boezen, H.M.; Grevink, R.G.; Duiverman, E.J. Lung function and exercise capacity in young adults born prematurely. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 173, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Evensen, K.A.; Steinshamn, S.; Tjønna, A.E.; Stølen, T.; Høydal, M.A.; Wisløff, U.; Brubakk, A.M.; Vik, T. Effects of preterm birth and fetal growth retardation on cardiovascular risk factors in young adulthood. Early Hum. Dev. 2009, 85, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Narang, I.; Bush, A.; Rosenthal, M. Gas transfer and pulmonary blood flow at rest and during exercise in adults 21 years after preterm birth. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 180, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sipola-Leppänen, M.; Hovi, P.; Andersson, S.; Wehkalampi, K.; Vääräsmäki, M.; Strang-Karlsson, S.; Järvenpää, A.L.; Mäkitie, O.; Eriksson, J.G.; Kajantie, E. Resting energy expenditure in young adults born preterm--the Helsinki study of very low birth weight adults. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lovering, A.; Laurie, S.; Elliott, J.; Beasley, K.; Yang, X.; Gust, C.; Mangum, T.S.; Goodman, R.D.; Hawn, J.A.; Gladstone, I.M. Normal pulmonary gas exchange efficiency and absence of exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia in adults with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 115, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Duke, J.W.; Lewandowski, A.J.; Abman, S.H.; Lovering, A.T. Physiological aspects of cardiopulmonary dysanapsis on exercise in adults born preterm. J. Physiol. 2022, 600, 463–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Saarenpää, H.K.; Tikanmäki, M.; Sipola-Leppänen, M.; Hovi, P.; Wehkalampi, K.; Siltanen, M.; Vääräsmäki, M.; Järvenpää, A.L.; Eriksson, J.G.; Andersson, S.; et al. Lung function in very low birth weight adults. Pediatrics 2015, 136, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Farrell, E.T.; Bates, M.L.; Pegelow, D.F.; Palta, M.; Eickhoff, J.C.; O’Brien, M.J.; Eldridge, M.W. Pulmonary gas exchange and exercise capacity in adults born preterm. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Caskey, S.; Gough, A.; Rowan, S.; Gillespie, S.; Clarke, J.; Riley, M.; Megamy, J.; Nicholls, P.; Patterson, C.; Halliday, H.L.; et al. Structural and functional lung impairment in adult survivors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2016, 13, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaseva, N.; Wehkalampi, K.; Strang-Karlsson, S.; Salonen, M.; Pesonen, A.K.; Räikkönen, K.; Tammelin, T.; Hovi, P.; Lahti, J.; Heinonen, K.; et al. Lower conditioning leisure-time physical activity in young adults born preterm at very low birth weight. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Haraldsdottir, K.; Watson, A.M.; Pegelow, D.F.; Palta, M.; Tetri, L.H.; Levin, T.; Brix, M.D.; Centanni, R.M.; Goss, K.N.; Eldridge, M.M. Blunted cardiac output response to exercise in adolescents born preterm. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 120, 2547–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, J.; Epton, M.J.; Harris, S.L.; Horwood, J.; Kingsford, R.A.; Troughton, R.; Greer, C.; Darlow, B.A. Reduced exercise capacity in adults born at very low birth weight a population-based cohort study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 205, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Duke, J.W.; Elliott, J.E.; Laurie, S.S.; Beasley, K.M.; Mangum, T.S.; Hawn, J.A.; Gladstone, I.M.; Lovering, A.T. Pulmonary gas exchange efficiency during exercise breathing normoxic and hypoxic gas in adults born very preterm with low diffusion capacity. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014, 117, 381–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cheong, J.L.; Olsen, J.E.; Konstan, T.; Mainzer, R.M.; Hickey, L.M.; Spittle, A.J.; Wark, J.D.; Cheung, M.M.; Garland, S.M.; Duff, J.; et al. Growth from infancy to adulthood and associations with cardiometabolic health in individuals born extremely preterm. Lancet Reg. Health Wet. Pac. 2023, 34, 100717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huckstep, O.J.; Burchert, H.; Williamson, W.; Telles, F.; Tan, C.M.; Bertagnolli, M.; Arnold, L.; Mohamed, A.; McCormick, K.; Hanssen, H.; et al. Impaired myocardial reserve underlies reduced exercise capacity and heart rate recovery in preterm-born young adults. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 22, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jarvis, D. The European Community Respiratory Health Survey II. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 20, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar]
  52. Harris, C.; Lunt, A.; Peacock, J.; Greenough, A. Lung function at 16–19 years in males and females born very prematurely. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2023, 58, 2035–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bassett, D.R. Scientific contributions of A. V. Hill: Exercise physiology pioneer. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 93, 1567–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Flegal, K.M.; Shephard, J.A.; Looker, A.C.; Graubard, B.I.; Borrud, L.G.; Ogden, C.L.; Harris, T.B.; Everhart, J.E.; Schenker, N. Comparisons of percentage body fat, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-stature ratio in adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Akindele, M.O.; Phillips, J.S.; Igumbor, E.U. The relationship between body fat percentage and body mass index in overweight and obese individuals in an urban African setting. J. Public Health Africa 2016, 7, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ranasinghe, C.; Gamage, P.; Katulanda, P.; Andraweera, N.; Thilakarathne, S.; Tharanga, P. Relationship between body mass index (bmi) and body fat percentage, estimated by bioelectrical impedance, in a group of Sri Lankan adults: A cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shete, A.N.; Bute, S.S.; Deshmukh, P.R. A study of VO2 max and body fat percentage in female athletes. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, bc01–bc03. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Goran, M.I.; Fields, D.A.; Hunter, G.R.; Herd, S.L.; Weinsier, R.L. Total body fat does not influence maximal aerobic capacity. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2000, 24, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kyle, U.G.; Genton, L.; Hans, D.; Karsegard, L.; Slosman, D.O.; Pichard, C. Age-related differences in fat-free mass, skeletal muscle, body cell mass and fat mass between 18 and 94 years. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 55, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Scribbans, T.D.; Vecsey, S.; Hankinson, P.B.; Foster, W.S.; Gurd, B.J. The effect of training intensity on VO2max in young healthy adults: A meta-regression and meta-analysis. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 2016, 9, 230–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Crowley, E.; Powell, C.; Carson, B.P.; Davies, R.W. The effect of exercise training intensity on VO2 max in healthy adults: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Trans. Sports Med. 2022, 2022, 9310710. [Google Scholar]
  62. Duke, J.W.; Lovering, A.T. Respiratory and cardiopulmonary limitations to aerobic exercise capacity in adults born preterm. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 129, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Duke, J.W.; Gladstone, I.M.; Sheel, A.W.; Lovering, A.T. Premature birth affects the degree of airway dysanapsis and mechanical ventilatory constraints. Exp. Physiol. 2018, 103, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Goss, K.N.; Beshish, A.G.; Barton, G.P.; Haraldsdottir, K.; Levin, T.S.; Tetri, L.H.; Battiola, T.J.; Mulchrone, A.M.; Pegelow, D.F.; Palta, M.; et al. Early pulmonary vascular disease in young adults born preterm. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, 1549–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Laurie, S.S.; Elliott, J.E.; Beasley, K.M.; Mangum, T.S.; Goodman, R.D.; Duke, J.W.; Gladstone, I.M.; Lovering, A.T. Exaggerated increase in pulmonary artery pressure during exercise in adults born preterm. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 821–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Parkinson, J.R.; Hyde, M.J.; Gale, C.; Santhakumaran, S.; Modi, N. Preterm birth and the metabolic syndrome in adult life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013, 131, e1240–e1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Carr, H.; Cnattingius, S.; Granath, F.; Ludvigsson, J.F.; Edstedt Bonamy, A.K. Preterm birth and risk of heart failure up to early adulthood. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 69, 2634–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Li, S.; Zhang, M.; Tian, H.; Liu, Z.; Yin, X.; Xi, B. Preterm birth and risk of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2014, 15, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hippisley-Cox, J.; Coupland, C.; Vinogradova, Y.; Robson, J.; Brindle, P. Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent UK sample of patients from general practice: A validation study. Heart 2008, 94, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Burchert, H.; Lapidaire, W.; Williamson, W.; McCourt, A.; Dockerill, C.; Woodward, W.; Tan, C.M.J.; Bertagnolli, M.; Mohamed, A.; Alsharqi, M.; et al. Aerobic exercise training response in preterm born young adults with elevated blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension: A randomised clinical trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2023, 207, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Abrantes, C.; Sampaio, J.; Reis, V.; Sousa, N.; Duarte, J. Physiological responses to treadmill and cycle exercise. Int. J. Sports Med. 2012, 33, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hermansen, L.; Saltin, B. Oxygen uptake during maximal treadmill and bicycle exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1969, 26, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Robinson, S. Experimental studies of physical fitness in relation to age. Arbeitsphysiologie 1938, 10, 251–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Astrand, I. Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physiol. Scand Suppl. 1960, 49, 1–92. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hawkins, S.; Wiswell, R. Rate and mechanism of maximal oxygen consumption decline with aging: Implications for exercise training. Sports Med. 2003, 33, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hoover, J.C.; Alenazi, A.M.; Alothman, S.; Alshehri, M.M.; Rucker, J.; Kluding, P. Recruitment for exercise or physical activity interventions: A protocol for systematic review. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Children 10 01427 g001
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRIMSA) flow diagram outlining the course of our systematic literature search for articles evaluating maximal aerobic exercise capacity in adults born at very low birth weight. Six databases (SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar) were searched. A total of 6202 articles were screened and 81 articles assessed for eligibility. Fifteen studies were included in the review and ten in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRIMSA) flow diagram outlining the course of our systematic literature search for articles evaluating maximal aerobic exercise capacity in adults born at very low birth weight. Six databases (SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar) were searched. A total of 6202 articles were screened and 81 articles assessed for eligibility. Fifteen studies were included in the review and ten in the meta-analysis.
Children 10 01427 g001
Children 10 01427 g002
Figure 2. Forest plot of aerobic exercise capacity (VO2 max/VO2 peak) in adults born at very low birth weight compared to their term-born counterparts [24,36,37,40,43,44,46,47,48,50].
Figure 2. Forest plot of aerobic exercise capacity (VO2 max/VO2 peak) in adults born at very low birth weight compared to their term-born counterparts [24,36,37,40,43,44,46,47,48,50].
Children 10 01427 g002
Table 1. Study characteristics of included studies.
Table 1. Study characteristics of included studies.
AuthorCountryStudy DesignNumber of VLBW InfantsNumber of Control SubjectsAge at Follow Up (Years)Outcome Measures
Vrijlandt et al., 2006 [36]NetherlandsProspective cohort study424818–22
  • VO2 max
  • Physical activity level
Evensen et al., 2009 [37]NorwayProspective cohort study325118
  • VO2 max
Narang et al., 2009 [38]UKProspective cohort study575020–25
  • Physical activity level
Sipola-Leppanen et al., 2011 [39]FinlandProspective cohort study11611820–28
  • Physical activity level
Lovering et al., 2013 [40]USAProspective cohort study121218–27
  • VO2 peak
Clemm et al., 2014 [24]NorwayProspective cohort study343324–25
  • VO2 peak
  • VO2 peak at anaerobic threshold
  • Physical activity level
Duke et al., 2014 [48]USAProspective cohort study131420–25
  • VO2 peak
Saarenpaa et al., 2015 [42]FinlandProspective cohort study16016220–25
  • Physical activity level
Farrell et al., 2015 [43]USAProspective cohort study141620–23
  • VO2 max
Caskey et al., 2016 [44]UKProspective cohort study202423–30
  • VO2 peak
Kasaeva et al., 2012 [45]FinlandProspective cohort study9410121–27
  • Physical activity level
Haraldsdottir et al., 2020 [46]USAProspective cohort study121224–28
  • VO2 max at normoxia and hypoxia
Huckstep et al., 2018 [8]UKProspective cohort study475420–26
  • VO2 max
  • Physical activity level
Yang et al., 2022 [47]New ZealandProspective cohort study2029326–30
  • VO2 peak
  • Physical activity level
Cheong et al., 2023 [49]AustraliaProspective cohort study12812625
  • Six-minute walk test
  • Maximum beep test level
Table 2. Summary of physical maximum aerobic exercise capacity in adults born at very low birth weight.
Table 2. Summary of physical maximum aerobic exercise capacity in adults born at very low birth weight.
StudyBirth Weight VLBW Infants (g)Birth Weight Control Subjects (g)Age at Follow Up (years)Weight VLBW Adults (kg)Weight Control Group (kg)VO2 Max/Peak MeasurementVO2 Measurement in VLBW Group (mL/kg/min)VO2 Measurement in Control Group (mL/kg/min)VO2 Measurement in BPD Group (mL/kg/min)
Vrijlandt et al., 2006 [36]1246 ± 232-18–2265 ± 1072 ± 10
  • VO2 Max
  • Cycle Ergometer
35.3 ± 6.920.8 ± 1.2-
Evensen et al., 2009 [37]1245 (800–1500)3700 (2670–5140)1864.2 ± 1.769.8 ± 1.3
  • VO2 Max
  • Treadmill
48.8 ± 1.448.5 ± 1.1-
Lovering et al., 2013 [40]1160 ± 450-21–2464.7 ± 9.375.7 ± 10.4
  • VO2 Peak
  • Cycle Ergometer
40.6 ± 9.448.8 ± 7.640.7 ± 14.3
Clemm et al., 2014 [24]1173 ± 163-24–2571.5 ± 4.372.3 ± 5.9
  • VO2 Peak
  • Treadmill
40.7 ± 2.844.2 ± 3.2-
Duke et al., 2014 [48]1080 ± 430-20–2565 ± 1072 ± 12
  • VO2 Peak
  • Cycle Ergometer
35.0 ± 9.048.0 ± 9.0-
Farrell et al., 2015 [43]1027 ± 296>150020–2376.3 ± 5.071.8 ± 5.4
  • VO2 Peak
  • Cycle Ergometer
39.5 ± 1.738.9 ± 1.6-
Caskey et al., 2016 [44]1234 ± 2053569 ± 29721–30--
  • VO2 Peak
  • Cycle Ergometer
45.2 ±11.339.3 ± 8.835.6 ± 7.5
Haraldsdottir et al., 2020 [46]<1500 g-24–2870.1 ± 13.375.6 ± 0.7
  • VO2 Max
  • Cycle Ergometer
34.88 ± 9.2645.79 + 8.71-
Huckstep et al., 2021 [50]1916 ± 8063390 ± 42422–27--
  • VO2 Max
  • Cycle Ergometer
33.6 ± 8.640.1 ± 9.0-
Yang et al., 2022 [47]1131 ± 2333362 ± 52928–2974.1 ± 18.880.8 ± 16.3
  • VO2 Peak
  • Cycle Ergometer
30.46 ± 8.0631.45 ± 7.8628.3 ± 1.1
Table 3. Summary of physical activity levels in adults born at very low birth weight.
Table 3. Summary of physical activity levels in adults born at very low birth weight.
StudyWeight
VLBW
Infants (g)		Weight
Control Subjects (g)		Age at
Follow Up
VLBW
Infants
(Years)		Age at Follow Up Control Subjects
(Years)		PA Assessment MeasureResultsSummary of Impact
Vrijlandt et al.,
2006 [36]		1246 ± 232-19 ± 0.320.8 ± 1.2
  • European Community Respiratory Health Survey II
  • Mean hours of vigorous exercise per week
  • Preterm born infants undertake significantly less vigorous exercise per week (1.9 h ± 2) compared to term born controls (2.9 h ± 2)
Narang et al., 2009 [38]1440 ± 5503410 ± 239021.7 ± 1.223.1 ± 2.0
  • No formal questionnaire reported
  • Mean days engaged with physical activity per week
  • There was no statistical difference in time spent being active per week between VLBW infants (3.0 ± 2.42) and the control group (3.0 ± 1.79)
Sippola-Leppanen et al., 2011 [39]1125 ± 2233606 ± 46922.3 ± 2.222.6 ± 2.2
  • No formal questionnaire reported
  • Frequency, duration, and intensity of exercise
  • There was significant difference between VLBW and control subjects in the intensity and duration of physical activity during a typical week
  • There was no difference in the frequency of activity between groups
Kaseva et al., 2012 [45]1157 ± 208.73608 ± 49224.9 ± 2.125.1 ± 2.2
  • Modified Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study
  • Frequency, time, and intensity of conditioning exercise
  • Frequency, time, and intensity of leisure-time physical activity
  • No significant difference in commuting, leisure-time, or conditioning physical activity between groups
  • VLBW infants were more likely to do less vigorous activity compared to their counterparts
Clemm et al., 2014 [24]1173 ± 163-24.7 ± 1.225.1 ± 1.2
  • No formal questionnaire reported
  • Categorical hours spent exercising per week
  • No statistically significant difference in leisure time spent doing physical activity between EP and term-born individuals.
Caskey et al., 2016 [44]1234 ± 2053569 ± 29726.4 ± 3.728.3 ± 3.3
  • European Community Respiratory Health Survey II
  • Frequency exercised 2–3 h per week
  • Statistically significant difference in the frequency individuals exercised 2–3 h per week between BPD, non-BPD adults, and term-born controls
Saarenpaa et al., 2015 [42]1126 ± 2183599 ± 46622.4 ± 2.122.5 ± 2.5
  • No formal questionnaire reported
  • Frequency of exercise per week
  • No statistically significant difference in the frequency of exercise per week between VLBW and non VLBW individuals
Huckstep et al., 2018 [8]1916 ±8063390 ± 42422.7 ± 3.0423.6 ± 3.8
  • No formal questionnaire reported
  • Hours spent doing moderate and vigorous physical activity per week
  • No statistical difference in hours spent doing moderate or vigorous activity between groups
Yang et al., 2022 [47]1131 ±2333362 ± 52928.3 ± 1.1 28.2 ± 0.9
  • European Community Respiratory Health Survey II
  • Mean days engaged with physical activity per week
  • VLBW exercised significantly less (2.9 h ± 2.6) per week compared to term-born controls (37 ± 2.4).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Poole, G.; Harris, C.; Greenough, A. Exercise Capacity in Very Low Birth Weight Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children 2023, 10, 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081427

AMA Style

Poole G, Harris C, Greenough A. Exercise Capacity in Very Low Birth Weight Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children. 2023; 10(8):1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Poole, Grace, Christopher Harris, and Anne Greenough. 2023. "Exercise Capacity in Very Low Birth Weight Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Children 10, no. 8: 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081427

APA Style

Poole, G., Harris, C., & Greenough, A. (2023). Exercise Capacity in Very Low Birth Weight Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Children, 10(8), 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop