Next Article in Journal
Pediatric Interventional Neuroradiology: Opportunities and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
The Incidence of Clubfoot in the Czech Republic: A Nationwide Epidemiological Study from 2000 to 2014
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Interaction Effect of Birth Spacing and Maternal Healthcare Services on Child Mortality in Pakistan

1
Department of Business Administration, ILMA University, Main Campus Korangi Creek, Karachi 75190, Pakistan
2
Department of Statistics, Kohsar University Murree, Murree 47150, Pakistan
3
Department of Botany, Kohsar University Murree, Murree 47150, Pakistan
4
Department of Business Studies, Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
5
Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
6
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(4), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040710
Submission received: 15 February 2023 / Revised: 2 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 April 2023 / Published: 12 April 2023

Abstract

:
There is widespread agreement that improved health should be regarded as a means and an end in the context of the development process. The health of the populace and the equitable provision of healthcare are two indicators of a society’s level of development. A variety of factors influences child mortality. This study investigated the causes of child death and the interaction effect of birth spacing (B.S.) and maternal health care services (MHCS) on child mortality. Using SPSS version 20, we used the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS) 2017–2018 data set to investigate the associated factors of child mortality and the moderating influence of birth spacing using binary logistic regression. The outcome variable is categorical with two categories. The findings indicated that the risk of infant death decreased with adequate B.S. between two pregnancies and access to maternal health care services. Birth spacing was found to moderate the link between access to maternal health care services (MHCS) and child mortality. Our research leads us to conclude that the amount of time between children’s births significantly reduces infant mortality. When the birth spacing is at least 33 months, the relationship between maternal health care services and child mortality becomes more evident and negative.

1. Introduction

The right to health is the most important part of the Human Rights Declaration of 1948 [1]. Improving people’s health should be seen as a moral obligation for decision-makers at all levels of government around the globe, including at the international, national, and local levels. Every child has the right to a better life and should be regarded as an asset to their nation as they represent the country’s future human capital. Improved chances of survival before the age of five can lead to a better life in the long run. Therefore, examining more closely whether a child can survive those delicate and important early years of life is vital.
Pakistan is one of the less developed nations with poor health conditions due to its low ranking of 154th in a list of 195 countries in terms of both the availability and quality of medical services [2]. The fact that the country was placed 36th out of 228 countries in terms of child mortality in 2018 is a sign of the deteriorating state of child health in that country. Even though Pakistan has improved child mortality from 141 per 1000 live births in 1990 to 67.2 per 1000 live births in 2019 [3], it is still higher than many developed nations and many less developed nations. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a more in-depth analysis of the problem of child mortality within the context of Pakistan.
Community-level factors need to be included in the analysis of child mortality to determine which community ecosystems and social structures pose health risks. These variables include immunization, poverty level, the percentage of educated women in the community or literacy rate, ethnicity, the accessibility of healthcare services, the availability of clean water, the community’s hygienic conditions, the cost of healthcare services, social or cultural norms regarding healthcare, residence (urban/rural), etc. [4].
Parental resources significantly impact child survival and mortality. Fathers with a higher education are more likely to provide for their families financially, increasing the likelihood of their children surviving adulthood. If a mother uses excellent preventive and curative health care techniques, her education may boost her productivity in childcare [3,4,5]. Women who have completed their educations might also choose to space out their pregnancies and have a smaller family size overall [6,7,8,9,10,11].
In emerging nations, infant and childhood mortality has been linked to a number of socioeconomic factors. However, depending on a country’s socioeconomic development, social and demographic factors influence infant mortality differently [12]. Park and Mercado (2015) [13] stated that the level of development in a country is affected by differences in economic growth based on income. There is evidence that economic growth influences children’s survival and mortality. Health care factors largely determine neonatal mortality in addition to socio-economic ones. The health of the baby is significantly impacted by women’s health-seeking behaviour, particularly during pregnancy and childbirth [14]. Increased antenatal care visits have been associated with reduced neonatal mortality, possibly because they enhance the mothers’ and babies’ likelihood of receiving and benefiting from health care. The factors of the place of delivery and the presence of medical help during labour and delivery both significantly determine the infant mortality rate. Having a baby in a hospital is linked to a lower infant mortality rate [15].
Women’s empowerment is critical for a country’s economic and social growth and for a child’s health [16]. Poor child health and women’s empowerment are serious public health issues. These disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [17]. The involvement of mothers in decision-making has a positive impact on reducing the death of children. Compared to women, men typically choose a large family size and require less contraception than women [18]. Therefore, empowering and equipping women to participate in decisions is vital [19,20].
Individuals with a low socioeconomic status also face difficulty accessing healthcare facilities, and this remains constant in poor nations. According to some studies, access to health care may be classified into five dimensions: cost, accessibility, availability, accommodation, and acceptability [21]. The population’s geographic accessibility to health facilities has not been thoroughly examined, particularly in terms of distance to health facilities. It has been demonstrated that the amount of time and distance required to reach a facility contributes to a declining trend in the utilization of primary health care services [22].
Additionally, mass media exposure is crucial for enhancing maternal and child health. Information on the need to vaccinate children and provide adequate health care is disseminated by various shows broadcast on television. Mothers can take better care of their children due to this awareness [4].
Both the time between births and the availability of maternal healthcare services are key factors in determining the likelihood of child mortality and health [23]. Births spaced out well, between 2 and 4 years, increasing the chances of survival for babies by 2.4 times and for children by 2.9 times [24]. In addition, infants born small for their gestational age have a higher risk of passing away during the neonatal period than children of an average size at birth [23]. The myriad of socioeconomic, demographic, and biological factors are linked to the tragically high child death rate. This study analyses the interactional effect of MHCS and B.S. on child mortality in Pakistan. The country was chosen because it is located in south Asia. Previous investigations, particularly those conducted in Pakistan, have never investigated the precise relationship. To accomplish this goal, we analysed the cross-sectional data gathered as part of the PDHS 2017–2018.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Source

The dataset from the PDHS 2017–2018 was used for analysis. The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics was decided that a sample size of 16,240 homes, of which 7980 were located in urban areas and 8260 were located in rural regions, would provide sufficient accuracy for the study variables. The procedure for collecting samples consisted of two parts. At the first stage of sampling, primary sample units totalling 580 were selected in accordance with a method known as systematic selection. At the second stage of the sampling procedure, a random selection of 28 households was carried out inside each cluster by employing a systematic sampling method based on the same probability [24]. Approximately 8274 women reported the information for all the study variables. To erase missing data, we used the list-wise deletion procedure. If even a single value in a record was missing, the whole record was skipped in this approach. After excluding the individuals with missing data, the remaining 8274 women’s records were evaluated.

2.2. Measurement

CM = Child mortality is the outcome variable of our study. This variable is divided into two categories: household had experienced child mortality coded as 1 and otherwise coded as 0.
M.E.S. = Mothers’ employment status is classified into two categories: 1 if they are currently employed and 0 if they are currently unemployed.
MPDM = Participation of mothers in significant household purchase decisions has been used as a proxy for mothers’ empowerment. It was classified as 0 if the mother has not taken part in the decision-making process and coded as 1 if the mother has taken part in the decision.
M.E.D. = The education of the mother was classified into two categories, coded as 2 if the mother has completed at least ten years of schooling, while it was marked as 1 if the mother has not attained ten years of schooling (no education and primary education).
W.S.H. = Utilizing information on the household’s assets and residence attributes, the W.S.H. was determined. It is divided into five quintiles, from the richest to the poorest. If mothers belong to the richest quintile (richest and richer quintile), they were coded as 2; if they belong to the poorest quintile (poorest, poorer, and middle quintiles), they were recorded as 1.
F.E.D. = There are two groups delineated by the father’s level of education. If the father has completed at least ten years of schooling (secondary school and higher), then it was coded as 2; if the father has not completed ten years of schooling (no education and elementary school), it was coded as 1.
E.M.M. = As a stand-in for exposure to mass media, the availability of television (T.V.) in homes was considered. If the family has a television, the value was 1; otherwise, it was 0.
B.S. = There have been two distinct categories established for birth intervals. Two births separated by more than 33 months was coded as 2, whereas fewer than 33 months was coded as 1.
MHCS = If the mother had availed all these services (minimum 4 antenatal visits, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal visit within 42 days of delivery), this was considered more accessible and coded as 2; if they were not availed all services, this was considered less accessible and coded as 1.
A.T.F. = There are two categories for toilet facility access: 1 for households with access to a toilet facility and 0 otherwise.
ACDW = The degree to which a household has access to clean drinking water is ranked on a scale from 0 (indicating that the household does not have access to clean drinking water) to 1 (indicating that the household does have access to clean drinking water).
UMNFP = UMNFP has been classified into two groups. If women do not have UMNFP, the value was written as 0 (for spacing and limiting), and if women do have UMNFP, the value was coded as 1.
To examine the association between different predictors and child mortality, the following model used was:
CM = f(M.E.S., MEMP, M.E.D., W.S.H., F.E.D., E.M.M., B.S., MHCS, A.T.F., ACDW, UMNFP, MHCS*B.S.)
The descriptive statistics revealed the frequencies and proportions of several participants’ characteristics. The categorical outcome variable showed whether or not there had been child mortalities in the home. When the result variable is a categorical variable with two categories, binary logistic regression was utilized to ascertain the factors that contributed to the death of the children. All analyses were conducted using version 20 of SPSS.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the statistics that describe the variables of the study. Approximately eight percent (7.8%) of the women who responded overall had personal experience with child mortality. Around two-thirds of all women (63.7%) and approximately one-third of the husbands of those women (39.9%) did not have an education higher than secondary school. More than half of all women did not have any form of empowerment (56.4%), were not exposed to any form of media (57.1%), and the vast majority of women (88.3%) did not have jobs. A total of 64% of the families were considered low-income; over two-thirds did not have clean drinking water (64.8%), whereas more than three-quarters had A.T.F. (83.9%). Approximately two-thirds of the mothers gave birth to their children at intervals less than 33 months apart (69.2%). One-fifth of the mothers (20.9%) had a UMNFP, while nearly half of the women (49.1%) assessed healthcare facilities as more accessible.
Table 2 explains that the mother’s participation in decision-making (OR = 0.948), mother’s education (OR = 0.685), wealth status of the household (OR = 0.754), father’s education (OR = 0.971), and E.M.M. (OR = 0.904) were negatively linked with child mortality. Similarly, the likelihood of birth spacing (OR = 0.558), and access to a toilet (OR = 0.843), drinking water (OR = 0.799), and maternal health care services (OR = 0.728) were inversely and significantly associated with child mortality. Women with at least ten years of schooling, who are empowered, have access to mass media, have sufficient birth spacing, and have educated husbands had a lower risk of child mortality. The probability of this happening was also lower in the case of wealthy homes with access to protected or clean water and toilet facilities. The UMNFP (OR = 1.102) was positively linked with child mortality.
In other words, women without UMNFP have a decreased risk of child mortality. In the meantime, it was found that maternal health care services had a negative and insignificant impact on the mortality rate of children. The spacing between births as an important contributing factor to reducing the high mortality rate. In this regard, we used an interaction term of birth spacing with maternal health care services.
Child mortality was considerably decreased (OR = 0.801) by the interaction impact of birth spacing and MHCS. The interaction effects of birth spacing and MHCS on child mortality were further illustrated using slope analysis (Figure 1). High birth spacing had a greater negative slope of the curve relating maternal health care services to child mortality than low birth spacing. Increasing the time between births is suggested to improve the relationship between MHCS and child mortality. The influence of MHCS on child mortality became more prominent as birth spacing increased.

4. Discussion

According to the findings of the study, factors such as the mother’s education, participation in decision-making, household wealth, exposure to mass media, a father’s education, the availability of toilet facilities, access to clean drinking water, and the amount of time between births all had a negative and significant impact on the risk of a child dying. On the other hand, the mother’s employment status and UMNFP positively affected child mortality. Education for women can benefit not just women but their families and society as a whole. The education of mothers is fundamental to improving child health and child survival. The higher the mother’s degree of education, the greater her understanding of risk factors connected with child mortality, such as early marriage control to prevent adolescent pregnancy. The father’s education minimizes child mortality through his increased salary and productivity, which improves the family’s financial conditions and maternal, child, and family health through efficient consumption habits. Child mortality is highly associated with both maternal and paternal education levels.
The likelihood of child mortality was higher for employed women. Employed women are believed to be overwhelmed with domestic duties, and their low-paying jobs limit their access to health care [25]. The effect of women’s employment positions on the utilization of maternity and child health services has varied among studies. Researchers have found a negative correlation between healthcare services and women’s employment status; employed women suffer time restrictions that reduce their utilization of healthcare services. Our findings are consistent with previous research [26,27].
Women with more years of schooling are typically more independent and are expected to participate more in household decision-making. Women with more autonomy, bargaining power, and empowerment are more likely to use contraceptives more frequently and have lower fertility rates [19]. Female autonomy in decision-making reduces unintended pregnancies by as much as 57% [28]. Women’s influence over home expenditures increases spending on children’s health, education, and nutrition. Individuals have also noticed that if both the husband and wife earn money for the family, most of the women’s money goes towards the health and nutrition of their children [19,29]. Maitra (2004) [30] believes that when women have more freedom, there is a large decline in the number of children who die before their first birthday. This is because women obtain better prenatal care and have more chances to give birth in a hospital.
To reduce child mortality, it is crucial to increase awareness among women. Mass media plays a major role and provides access to critical and practical information about child immunization and the right health care that should be offered to children. This understanding enables mothers to adequately care for their infants, reducing child mortality [31]. The education of the father is negatively linked with child mortality. A person with more education is more likely to have a higher income, which is important for the family’s financial stability and access to health care [32]. A male who has received formal education has a greater chance of understanding and appreciating the significance of maintaining optimal child health. Child mortality rates are lower in more financially secure households. People in wealthier households live better and have better access to health care. Especially in more affluent communities, this may help lower the infant death rate. However, households with higher socioeconomic levels are more likely to have access to healthcare facilities and basic sanitation amenities like clean water and flush toilets [33].
The prevalence of diarrhoea, one of the leading causes of child mortality, can be reduced by providing children with access to toilets [34]. In 2017, diarrheal illness was responsible for 0.53 million deaths worldwide [35]. It was also the cause of death for one out of every ten children who passed away. Participation in water, sanitation, and hygiene programmes is the most effective way to prevent diarrheal infections [36], which in turn can assist in lowering the mortality rate of children [34].
Additionally, the findings indicated that birth intervals affect infant mortality [37,38]. Children born with birth intervals of fewer than 24 months have a lower chance of surviving than children born after more than 24 months. This was also confirmed by the overall findings, which indicate that the infant mortality rate for children with a shorter birth interval was 11.8% and that for children with a longer birth interval was 4.9% [39].
Child mortality was positively linked with UMNFP. Numerous socio-economic and cultural variables contribute to Pakistan’s high prevalence of unmet family planning needs. Access to contraceptives for women is restricted for a number of reasons, including fear of side effects and sociocultural constraints. Effective public policy interventions and social mobilization with the participation of religious and community leaders can be useful in lowering the percentage of people who do not receive the family planning services they require [40,41].
Children born to healthy mothers are also healthy. Childhood developmental problems can result from the mother’s poor health (malnutrition) [42]. The child is more likely to have health issues or pass away if the mother is not in excellent health throughout the pregnancy and/or the foetus is exposed to teratogen(s), including radiation, infectious agents, hormones, chemical agents, nutritional deficits, and maternal illnesses [31,43].
It is important to note that birth spacing moderated the relationship between maternal healthcare services and infant mortality. The association between maternal health care services and child mortality was strengthened by birth spacing. The reduction in infant mortality caused by access to quality maternal health care increased in magnitude as births are spaced further apart. The World Health Organization recommends a minimum of 33 months of birth spacing between births or 24 months before trying a future pregnancy to decrease the risk of unfavourable maternal and newborn outcomes. The short time between pregnancies makes it hard for the mother to obtain all the nutrients she needs, especially iron and folate, for the subsequent pregnancy. This lack of nutrients is detrimental for the health of both mothers and their children. Similarly, having a short time between pregnancies is linked to having a baby with a small gestational age, giving birth prematurely, having a low birth weight, having a stillbirth, and increasing rates of child and mother mortality [44].

5. Recommendation

Our research on Pakistan supports the significance of these key risk factors for infant mortality, namely those connected to the child, the mother, and the household, such as socioeconomic position, environmental conditions, social behaviour, and health services utilization. These results demonstrated the need for future child health programs to take a broader strategy to significantly reduce child mortality in Pakistan, particularly in rural and underdeveloped areas. Improvements in the accessibility of formal health services, special focus on children during their first year of life, emphasis on teaching entire families about birth spacing, and efforts to make antenatal care, institutional delivery, and postnatal services more accessible to mothers are all necessary components of such programs. They also need to continue to improve households’ economic standing.

6. Limitations and Direction for Further Study

This study examined the moderating effect of birth spacing on the association between maternal healthcare services and child mortality in Pakistan. The current research is limited since we did not determine whether or not other factors affected the hypothesized relationship. It is important to note that several other causes could also affect child mortality, all of which need to be investigated. For instance, a father’s educational background may play a role in the relationship between the household’s wealth status and the child mortality rate. This is due to the fact that a father’s education plays an essential role in the process of raising awareness about healthy and nutritious food, which is beneficial for the health of children. He will be attentive to prevent children from consuming tainted and preserved foods.

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, it was determined that birth spacing and maternal health care services are key determinants of child mortality. Compared to low birth spacing, high birth spacing had a stronger negative slope on the curve, indicating a relationship between maternal health care services and child mortality. Increasing the time between births improved the connection between MHCS and child mortality. As birth spacing increased, the effect of MHCS on infant mortality became more pronounced. According to the findings from this study, there is an urgent need to address the social variables influencing maternal and infant mortality in Pakistan. Investments in females’ education are vital due to the importance of a mother’s education for enhancing child survival. The Ministry of Health and the provinces must work together to ensure that healthcare messages about child and maternal health include other areas, such as employment, schooling, empowerment, birth spacing, and preventing children from getting married too young. The formal and informal education of women should be a priority for governments so that they may contribute more effectively to both the advancement of the country and their own personal lives. The country must utilize the mass media’s private and public sectors to raise knowledge of the benefits of birth spacing and family planning, particularly for women’s and children’s health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F.A. and Z.S.L.; Data curation, M.F.A., S.I., N.I.A., I.T. and G.A.; Formal analysis, M.F.A., S.I., N.I.A., I.T. and G.A.; Funding acquisition, Z.S.L.; Methodology, M.F.A., S.I. and G.A.; Project administration, G.A.; Resources, G.A.; Software, M.F.A. and S.I.; Supervision, Z.S.L.; Validation, Z.S.L.; Visualization, I.T.; Writing—original draft, M.F.A., S.I., N.I.A., I.T., G.A. and Z.S.L.; Writing—review & editing, M.F.A. and Z.S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

We used the secondary data of the PDHS 2017–2018 available at: https://www.nips.org.pk/study_detail.php?detail=MTgw (accessed on 24 September 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

LMICsLow- and middle-income countries
PDHSPakistan Demographic and Health Survey
T.V.Television
UMNFPUnmet need for family planning
M.E.SMother’s employment status
E.M.M.Exposure to mass media
MHCSMaternal healthcare services
OROdd ratios
A.T.F.Access to toilet facilities

References

  1. World Health Organization; United Nations. Human Rights, Health, and Poverty Reduction Strategies; Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  2. Lozano, R.; Wang, H.; Foreman, K.J.; Rajaratnam, J.K.; Naghavi, M.; Marcus, J.R.; Dwyer-Lindgren, L.; Lofgren, K.T.; Phillips, D.; Atkinson, C.; et al. Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 on Maternal and Child Mortality: An Updated Systematic Analysis. Lancet 2011, 378, 1139–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. UNICEF. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Estimates Developed by the U.N. Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Asif, M.F.; Pervaiz, Z.; Afridi, J.R.; Safdar, R.; Abid, G.; Lassi, Z.S. Socio-economic determinants of child mortality in Pakistan and the moderating role of household’s wealth index. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Willcox, M.L.; Price, J.; Scott, S.; Nicholson, B.D.; Stuart, B.; Roberts, N.W.; Allott, H.; Mubangizi, V.; Dumont, A.; Harnden, A. Death Audits and Reviews for Reducing Maternal, Perinatal and Child Mortality. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020. Available online: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012982.pub2/full (accessed on 21 March 2023).
  6. Aheto, J.M. Predictive model and determinants of under-five child mortality: Evidence from the 2014 Ghana demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, A.; Şenturk, İ. Justifying the impact of economic deprivation, maternal status and health infrastructure on under-five child mortality in Pakistan: An empirical analysis. Bull. Bus. Econ. 2019, 8, 140–154. [Google Scholar]
  8. Andriano, L.; Monden, C.W. The causal effect of maternal education on child mortality: Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Malawi and Uganda. Demography 2019, 56, 1765–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Roberton, T.; Carter, E.D.; Chou, V.B.; Stegmuller, A.R.; Jackson, B.D.; Tam, Y.; Sawadogo-Lewis, T.; Walker, N. Early estimates of the indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: A modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e901–e908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nyqvist, M.B.; Guariso, A.; Svensson, J.; Yanagizawa-Drott, D. Reducing child mortality in the last mile: Experimental evidence on community health promoters in Uganda. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2019, 11, 155–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharrow, D.; Hug, L.; You, D.; Alkema, L.; Black, R.; Cousens, S.; Croft, T.; Gaigbe-Togbe, V.; Gerland, P.; Guillot, M.; et al. Global, regional, and national trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2019 with scenario-based projections until 2030: A systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet Glob. Health 2022, 10, e195–e206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Molitoris, J.; Barclay, K.; Kolk, M. When and where birth spacing matters for child survival: An international comparison using the DHS. Demography 2019, 56, 1349–1370. [Google Scholar]
  13. Park, C.Y.; Mercado, R. Financial Inclusion, Poverty, and Income Inequality in Developing Asia. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series. 2015. Available online: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/153143/ewp-426.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2023).
  14. Headey, D.; Heidkamp, R.; Osendarp, S.; Ruel, M.; Scott, N.; Black, R.; Shekar, M.; Bouis, H.; Flory, A.; Haddad, L.; et al. Impacts of COVID-19 on childhood malnutrition and nutrition-related mortality. Lancet 2020, 396, 519–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garcia, L.P.; Fernandes, C.M.; Traebert, J. Risk factors for neonatal death in the capital city with the lowest infant mortality rate in Brazil. J. Pediatr. 2019, 95, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bibi, M.; Khan, F.A.; Irshad, I. Women empowerment and infant mortality in Pakistan: Micro data evidence. Pak. J. Appl. Econ. 2020, 30, 181–201. [Google Scholar]
  17. Doku, D.T.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Neupane, S. Associations of women’s empowerment with neonatal, infant and under-5 mortality in low-and/middle-income countries: Meta-analysis of individual participant data from 59 countries. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e001558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Becker, S. Measuring unmet need: Wives, husbands or couples? International Family Planning Perspectives 1999, 25, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Balk, D. Individual and community aspects of women’s status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Popul. Stud. 1994, 48, 21–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eswaran, M. The empowerment of women, fertility, and child mortality: Towards a theoretical analysis. J. Popul. Econ. 2002, 15, 433–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Penchansky, R.; Thomas, J.W. The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med. Care 1981, 19, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asif, M.F.; Ali, S.; Ali, M.; Abid, G.; Lassi, Z.S. The Moderating Role of Maternal Education and Employment on Child Health in Pakistan. Children 2022, 9, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhutta, Z.A.; Hafeez, A. What can Pakistan do to address maternal and child health over the next decade? Health Res. Policy Syst. 2015, 13, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  24. National Institute of Population Studies. Pakistan Demographic Health Survey 2017–2018; National Institute of Population Studies: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Asif, M.F.; Khalid, S.; Khalid, K.R.; Abid, G. Effect of mother’s employment on child mortality in Pakistan: Moderating role of mother’s empowerment. J. ISOSS 2021, 7, 175–186. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ali, S.; Asif, M.F.; Khan, M.K.; Fatima, N.; Safdar, H.; Lassi, Z.S. Moderating role of husband’s education and their employment on female labor force participation in Pakistan. Ilkogr. Online 2020, 19, 5265–5276. [Google Scholar]
  27. Matsumura, M.; Gubhaju, B. Women’s Status, Household Structure and the Utilization of Maternal Health Services in Nepal: Even primary-leve1 education can significantly increase the chances of a woman using maternal health care from a modem health facility. Asia-Pac. Popul. J. 2001, 16, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mensch, B.S.; Chuang, E.K.; Melnikas, A.J.; Psaki, S.R. Evidence for causal links between education and maternal and child health: Systematic review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2019, 24, 504–522. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shrof, M.; Grifths, P.; Adair, L.; Suchindran, C.; Bentley, M. Maternal autonomy is inversely related to child stunting in Andhra Pradesh. India Matern Child Nutr. 2009, 5, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Maitra, P. Parental bargaining, health inputs and child mortality in India. Health Econ. 2004, 23, 259–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Orsido, T.T.; Asseffa, N.A.; Berheto, T.M. Predictors of Neonatal mortality in Neonatal intensive care unit at referral Hospital in Southern Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Qaiser, N.; Sattar, N.; Arshi, S.; Asif, M.F.; Afridi, J.R. Impact of thriving on job performance, positive health and turnover intention: Consequences of thriving at workplace. Int. J. Inf. Bus Manag. 2021, 13, 97–107. [Google Scholar]
  33. Susuman, A.S. Child Mortality in Ethiopia. Iran J. Public Health 2012, 41, 919. [Google Scholar]
  34. Alsan, M.; Goldin, C. Watersheds in child mortality: The role of effective water and sewerage infrastructure, 1880–1920. J. Political Econ. 2019, 127, 586–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dadonaite, B. Child and Infant Mortality; University of Oxford: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/childhood-diarrheal-diseases (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  36. Headey, D.; Palloni, G. Water, sanitation, and child health: Evidence from subnational panel data in 59 countries. Demography 2019, 56, 729–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sathar, Z.A. Seeking explanations for high levels of infant mortality in Pakistan. Pak. J. Dev. Rev. 1987, 26, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kozuki, N.; Walker, N. Exploring the association between short/long preceding birth intervals and child mortality: Using reference birth interval children of the same mother as comparison. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Khan, R.E.; Bari, K.M.; Raza, M.A. Socioeconomic determinants of child mortality: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey. Bus Rev. 2018, 2, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Asif, M.F.; Pervaiz, Z. Socio-demographic determinants of unmet need for family planning among married women in Pakistan. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Asif, M.F.; Pervaiz, Z.; Afridi, J.R.; Abid, G.; Lassi, Z.S. Role of husband’s attitude towards the usage of contraceptives for unmet need of family planning among married women of reproductive age in Pakistan. BMC Women Health 2021, 21, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. USAID. Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Strategy 2014–2025; Agency for International Development: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  43. Wagstaff, A. Poverty and health sector inequalities. Bull. World Health Organ. 2002, 80, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  44. World Health Organization. Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing: Geneva, Switzerland 13–15 June 2005 (No. WHO/RHR/07.1); World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Interaction Effect of Birth Spacing and MHCS on Child Mortality.
Figure 1. Interaction Effect of Birth Spacing and MHCS on Child Mortality.
Children 10 00710 g001
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of different characteristics of respondents.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of different characteristics of respondents.
DescriptiveFrequency
8274
Percent (%)
Child’s living status Alive 763292.2
Not alive 6427.8
Mother’s employment statusCurrently unemployed730588.3
Currently employed96911.7
Mother participates in decision makingLess empowered467256.4.
More empowered360243.6
Mother’s educationLess than ten years of schooling527163.7
At least ten years of schooling300336.3
Household wealth indexPoorest530664.1
Richest296835.9
Father’s educationLess than ten years of schooling330239.9
At least ten years of schooling497260.1
Exposure to mass mediaNo exposure339541.0
Exposure487859.0
Birth spacingLess than 33 Months572669.2
At least 33 Months254838.8
Maternal health care servicesLess accessible421050.9
More accessible406449.1
Access to toilet facilitiesNo access133216.1
Access694283.9
Access to clean drinking waterNo536264.8
Yes291235.2
Unmet need for family planningNo661179.9
Yes166320.1
Table 2. The relationship between socio-economic determinants and child mortality: moderating role of birth spacing.
Table 2. The relationship between socio-economic determinants and child mortality: moderating role of birth spacing.
Dependent Variable: Child Mortality
Independent VariablesΒSig.Odd Ratio (OR)
Mother’s Employment StatusCurrently unemployedRef
Currently employed0.2480.0001.299
Mother Participates in Decision-Making NoRef
Yes−0.0680.0510.981
Mother’s EducationLess than ten years of schoolingRef
At least ten years of schooling−0.3510.0000.685
Wealth Status of HouseholdPoorestRef
Richest−0.3190.0000.754
Father’s EducationLess than ten years of schoolingRef
At least ten years of schooling−0.0920.0830.971
Exposure to Mass Media NoRef
Yes−0.1030.0130.904
Birth SpacingLess than 33 MonthsRef
At least 33 Months−0.5720.0010.558
Maternal Health Care ServicesLess utilizationRef
More utilization−0.2660.2730.728
Access to Toilet FacilitiesNoRef
Yes−0.1790.0000.843
Access to Clean Drinking WaterNoRef
Yes−0.2140.0000.799
Unmet Need for Family PlanningNoRef
Yes0.1170.0461.102
Birth Spacing * Maternal Health Care Services−0.1220.0190.801
* indicates the interaction term.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Asif, M.F.; Ishtiaq, S.; Abbasi, N.I.; Tahir, I.; Abid, G.; Lassi, Z.S. The Interaction Effect of Birth Spacing and Maternal Healthcare Services on Child Mortality in Pakistan. Children 2023, 10, 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040710

AMA Style

Asif MF, Ishtiaq S, Abbasi NI, Tahir I, Abid G, Lassi ZS. The Interaction Effect of Birth Spacing and Maternal Healthcare Services on Child Mortality in Pakistan. Children. 2023; 10(4):710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Asif, Muhammad Farhan, Saima Ishtiaq, Nishat Ishfaq Abbasi, Iffat Tahir, Ghulam Abid, and Zohra S. Lassi. 2023. "The Interaction Effect of Birth Spacing and Maternal Healthcare Services on Child Mortality in Pakistan" Children 10, no. 4: 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040710

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop