Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Perceived Physical Competence and Outdoor Play among Children Aged 9–12 Years-Focused Sex-Specific Differences
Next Article in Special Issue
A Cross-Sectional Investigation of Preadolescent Cardiometabolic Health: Associations with Fitness, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Nutrition, and Sleep
Previous Article in Journal
Point Prevalence of Complementary or Alternative Medicine Use among Children Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/children10010134
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understanding the Characteristics of At-Risk Youths in Guatemala: Evidence from a Sports for Human Development Program

by
Pedro Danilo Ponciano Nuñez
1,2,*,
Iago Portela-Pino
3 and
María José Martínez-Patiño
1,4
1
Research Group on Education, Physical Activity and Health (GIES 10) Galicia Sur Research Institute (ISS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, 36312 Vigo, Spain
2
Department of Physical Education, Sport and Leisure, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City 01015, Guatemala
3
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Isabel I University, 09003 Burgos, Spain
4
Olympic Studies Centre, Faculty of Science, Education and Sport, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(1), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010134
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Activity and Physical Fitness among Children and Adolescent)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Guatemala is a multiethnic and multicultural country that has suffered from poverty and violence. Sports can serve as tool to foster development across the country; however, there is limited research on the use of sports as a tool for promoting broader social benefits in Guatemala. The purpose of this study was to compare sports and the health and physiological characteristics of at-risk youths in Guatemala. The research objectives were achieved through a quantitative approach and the participation of 90 youths involved in an educational organization through sports and 91 youths who have not been influenced by any organization. The results showed that urban at-risk youths involved in a sports for education organization develop more self-esteem; they have higher levels of physical activity than their peers who are not involved in an educational organization; the socioemotional competencies of self-regulation and motivation are higher in urban areas; empathy is higher in men than in women; the level of the self-perception of health is lower and health literacy higher. However, the at-risk youths who are not involved in an educational organization showed that their self-regulation was higher, and the level of health literacy was higher for all factors. This was through a set of attitudes and skills as a result of their historical development and sociocultural strategies transmitted from generation to generation to foster health and physical activity.

1. Introduction

Adolescence is considered a transition period of physical and psychological changes [1]. This transition period should occur with a good balance of body and mind development [2]. During this transition period, youths experience a variety of insecurities and choices [3]. Adequate development of the social competences that allow them to make the best decisions according to the needs of their daily lives is fundamental [4,5,6]. Sports can become a platform to foster health [7,8] and enable broader positive social outcomes (e.g., inclusion, life skills) in communities [9,10,11,12]. For example, the participation in sports-based programming of at-risk youths has demonstrated a greater impact on their lives than music or art programs [13]. This has led to positive psychosocial and peacebuilding outcomes in countries with a long history of conflict [14,15,16]. Youths are considered “at-risk” when it is difficult for them to participate in their social and educational settings [17].
Sports-based intervention programs appear to improve intellectual development and civic values [18]. Youths who participate in physical activity have improved mental health [19] and experience an increase in their self-esteem [20]. Social backgrounds are affected by crime and violence [21], which result in hooliganism and corruption [16,22,23], due to the need for acceptance by peers [24]. The establishment of sports-based programming can result in beneficial peer interactions and have a positive influence on self-esteem [10,25]. The improvement of self-esteem decreases the risk of acquiring depression by solving problematic situations in the social environment [26]. This leads to the need for long-term programs based on evidence [10,16,27] for the improvement of the psychological and physical characteristics [28] of youths, who then become community role models [29,30,31,32].
Systematic programs can contribute to eradicating school truancy, which results in low educational achievement, family disintegration, and less sports participation [33]. School departees suffer from deficient health, causing them to regularly go to the doctor and not participating or being able to participate in heavy physical activity [34]. Youths who participate in physical activity programming drop out of school less often, and their self-esteem levels continually increase [10,35]. Sports programming can serve as space for the detection of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), as an organization is required to have access to participants’ previous health screening before joining [36]. However, the power of sports (including observable impacts) has been challenged by the scholarly community [37], partly due to the limited evidence of the types of outcomes of these interventions [38,39]. Critical thinking is necessary to question what conditions are required and to explain how change happens using sports [38,40]. The positive impact depends on various factors (e.g., context, type of sports, role models) [41,42] because sports does not promote positive outcomes by itself [15,16,22,23].
Guatemala is a country with social inequality (e.g., education, violence, and delinquency) [43], high emigration rates [44], a high number of homicides [21], and conflict between local ethnic groups [45], and due to this, describing the characteristics of local youths becomes relevant [43]. The purpose of this study was to compare the sports, health, and physiological characteristics of at-risk youths from urban and rural settings in Guatemala. This study establishes a criterion for the current development of these characteristics in the participants. The participants from the urban region are exposed to the implementation of a values education curriculum through sports and belong to a youth foundation [43]. The Guatemalan Olympic Foundation (FUNOG) pursues the positive development of youths who live in highly dangerous neighborhoods of Guatemala City and who have mostly moved from rural to urban areas [21,43,46]. On the other hand, the youths from the rural region do not participate in an organization and are not exposed to a values education curriculum through sports. This study will establish if at-risk youths who are part of an educational program show better physical, educational, and health characteristics compared to their peers who are not part of a program.

2. Materials and Methods

Based on the objective, an exploratory case study with a descriptive characteristic utilizing purposive sampling was chosen to allow the authors to make decisions adjusted to the characteristics of the participants. All the youths participating in the sports-based educational organization were part of the research study. The program analyzed was implemented by FUNOG’s administrative staff and trainers. Participants must live in a neighborhood where the organization operates and join voluntarily with the permission of their parents. The authors intentionally identified another population of at-risk youths with similar characteristics (e.g., age, vulnerable condition) from another region of the country who do not participate in a sports education organization to recover the data and finally make a comparison based on the descriptive analysis of the main variables. The study used scales commonly applied in educational and psychological studies, pointing out the internal consistency of each of the scales.

2.1. Study Context

The participants of the urban region (Guatemala City, Guatemala) are part of the Guatemalan Olympic Foundation (FUNOG), an educational program based on Olympic values that promotes physical activity as a space for social transformation [21,43,46]. Recent studies have identified that the sports used by FUNOG respond to a pedagogical strategy that seeks to establish safe spaces to transform social scenarios outside of traditional sports (e.g., soccer, basketball) that young people are accustomed to practicing, allowing them to have access to other sports where they can change their mindset by experiencing other social environments (e.g., racquet sports, swimming, gymnastics, rugby) [43]. The program involves different stakeholders for its development in the field (e.g., parents, coaches, athletes, and volunteers) and financial sustainability (national and international organizations). The program includes two scholarship initiatives that provide the participants with educational opportunities and a tutoring system to monitor homework completion, favoring the reduction of the school truancy rate of young people who participate in an educational organization [43]. The rural region was represented by youths who are not involved in an educational organization from the Highland community of Momostenango (Totonicapán, Guatemala). These youths were purposely selected based on similar risk characteristics as youths who participate in an educational program and voluntarily participated in the study through the support of a local leader who facilitated contact with at-risk youths inside the community.

2.2. Participants

The study consisted of a sample of 181 participants (N = 91 urban; N = 90 rural). The sample of participants were 50.8% (N = 92) male and 49.2% (N = 89) female. The median age was 14.44 (max. = 18; min. = 12).

2.3. Questionnaires

The application of the research instruments consisted of two phases. Phase I was a purpose-built survey that included personal and familiar variables for each participant. Phase II was the use of questionnaires to measure the level of physical activity, social–emotional competences, self-esteem, purpose in life, and health literacy. The questionnaires were the following: (i) Assessment Scale of Social-Emotional Competences (ASSEC), (ii) Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A), (iii) Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) and (iv) Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47).
The Assessment Scale of Social-Emotional Competences (ASSEC) was used to measure the level of progress in several social–emotional competences: (i) self-regulation, (ii) teamwork, (iii) self-awareness, (iv) interpersonal regulation, (v) empathy, (vi) motivation, and (vii) basic conflict resolution [47]. The internal consistency in the study was 0.90.
The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A) assesses the amount of physical activity of youths of 14 to 20 years of age. The questionnaire is a Likert scale that uses nine items to evaluate the levels of physical activity that the participant has carried out in the last seven days, and its final result is the mean of the points for Items 1–8 [48]. Item 1 refers to any physical activity carried out in the participants free time. It includes 24 sub-items, and 22 are adapted to the activities practiced in Spain [49], while the last two are completed by each participant and can include a maximum of two physical activities not offered by the questionnaire. The points for Item 1 are obtained from the average of all the sub-items. Item 2 measures the amount of physical activity that the participants performed through a physical education class. Item 3 shows the level of physical activity before and after a meal. Item 5 measures how many times the participant was active after school until 6:00 p.m. seven days prior to the use of the questionnaire. Additionally, Item 5 measures how many times the participant was active between 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. Item 6 evaluates the number of times that the participants were active on the weekend before applying the questionnaire. Item 7 shows the frequency and intensity of the physical activities of the last week carried out by the participants. Item 8 includes seven sub-items for each of the seven days of the week. The participants mark the frequency with which they perform physical activities, and the final score is the total of the mean of the sub-items. Item 9 is used to establish the less-frequent types of physical activity due to a disease; this is not included in the calculation of the final score. The score is established between 1 (low physical activity index) and 5 (high physical activity index). Three ranges are used to show PAQ-A results ≤ 2 as “low activity”, >2 and ≤3 as “moderate activity”, and >3 as “high activity” [50,51].
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) is used (Spanish adaptation) to measure the level of self-esteem of the participants [52]. The scale includes ten items on a Likert scale: (i) strongly agree, (ii) agree, (iii) disagree, and (iv) strongly disagree. The self-esteem score is categorized as follows: low self-esteem (<25 points), average self-esteem (26–29 points), and high self-esteem (30–40 points). The Purpose In Life test (PIL) is used (Spanish adaptation) for evaluating the purpose in life based on the original test of Crumbaugh and Mabolick, which includes 20 Likert-scale items with answer options from 1 to 7 [53]. Life purpose is an empirical construct supported by multiple studies [53] consisting of four factors: (i) perception of purpose (FPI) including the knowledge and motivations a person perceives in order to live and value his or her own life (Items: 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 20); (ii) experience of purpose (FP2) evaluates the participant’s perception of personal existence in relation to good things, such as everyday experiences and events (Items: 1, 2, 5, 9, 17, 19, and 20); (iii) goals and tasks (FP3) evaluates objectives linked to concrete actions in life and the responsibility assumed by setting such objectives (Items: 3, 7, 18, 13, 17, 19, and 20; (iv) fate–freedom dialectics (FP4) considers the dilemma between freedom and fate in an individual´s life and contemplating death as an inevitable end (Items: 14, 15, an 18) [53,54]. The internal consistency in the study was 0.78.
The Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) measures how participants obtain, understand, value, and apply information to make decisions related to disease prevention and health promotion [55]. The HLS-EU-Q47 includes 47 items in 12 sub-categories, each of them covering three different areas: (i) attention and care, (ii) disease prevention, and (iii) health promotion [56], and it provides the information of four different abilities in health literacy, gaining access, understanding, evaluating, and applying. The instrument is marked on a Likert scale based on four categories: (1 = very difficult, 2 = difficult 3 = easy, 4 = very easy). To identify risk factors of deficient health literacy (HL), the participants’ scores were classified as HL deficient: <25.88 and HL excellent > 41.45 [56]. The internal consistency in the study was 0.94.

2.4. Data Analysis

For the descriptive calculations, measures of central tendency such as the mean, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum of all the scale variables were used, as well as asymmetry and kurtosis. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (p > 0.05) was used to verify the parametric assumption of normality. Three of the samples reported non-parametric distributions: self-esteem (K-S = 0.005), prevention (K-S = 0.021), and conflict resolution (K-S = 0.015). Since the other variables met the conditions of a normal distribution, we proceeded to calculate the parametric statistics for all the hypotheses. To establish the relationship between the quantitative cut-off variables, the Pearson correlation statistic was used in order to establish the difference in the means between the different dependent variables and the categorical polytomous variables (academic qualifications, source of income, religion, residence). The statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS v. 23 statistical program (IBM Corp., 2012). The level of significance for all analyses was p < 0.05.

2.5. Procedures

The study was regulated based on the Declaration of Helsinki (Hong Kong, September 1989) and the EEC Good Clinical Practice Recommendation (Document 111/3976/88 July 1990). The process strategy was to apply the test to the participants in Guatemala City and Momostenango. The staff (coaches and teachers) were trained by the researchers in the use of the instruments, and their doubts related to the research process were clarified. Staff described to the participants’ parents the conditions, emphasizing that testing would be anonymous and the data of the youths participating would be kept confidential. A consent form was provided and signed by the parents of the participants, and the test was applied by the staff.

3. Results

3.1. Personal, Familial, and Health Profile of Participants

The participants (N = 181) were categorized in two categories: (i) urban and (ii) rural. In the urban area (participating in the educational organization), 56% were male and 44% were female. In the rural area (not participating in the educational organization), 45.6% were male and 54.4% were female. With respect to family income (Table 1), there were significant differences between the family income of participating and non-participating youths (Chi-squared = 0.0001).
The participating youths having a monthly income of less than EUR 500 made up 61.5% and 36.3% having between EUR 501 and EUR 1000, and 2.2% received more than EUR 1001. The non-participating youths having a monthly income of less than EUR 500 were 6% and 72% having between EUR 501 and EUR 1000, and 12% received more than EUR 1001.
There were 61.9% of participants having completed primary school, 37% secondary school, and 1.1% with no formal education. The employment condition indicated that 86.2% of the participants were not employed, 6.6% worked in the formal economy, and 7.2% worked in the informal economy. There were 96.7% of participants having no vocational training, and 3.4% of the sample had vocational training. Their income showed that 34.3% of the participants received an income through employment and 58% from their families, and 7.7% had no income. The data showed that 70.7% of the participants were Catholic, 16% Christian, 8.3% Evangelical, and 5% non-religious. The mothers of 61.3% of the participants completed secondary school and 23.2 primary school, while 6.1% had employment training, 8.3% technical training, and 1.1% no education. The fathers of 58.6% of the participants completed secondary school, 18.2% received employment training, 12.2% received technical employment training, 10.5% completed primary school, and 0.6% had no education.

3.2. Physical Activity, Health, and Psychological Characteristics

The results showed (Table 2) that the average sports, health, and psychological variables of at-risk youths in Guatemala were low. Self-esteem barely exceeded 21 points; the level of physical activity reached an average of 2.87, the three dimensions of health literacy, health care, disease prevention, and health promotion were also low; the mastery of socioemotional competences was medium, except for teamwork, empathy, and self-regulation, which were very low.
Explaining the differences (Table 3) in the sports, health, and psychological variables, all the variables were significant, except for health prevention, self-awareness, conflict resolution, teamwork, empathy, and general socioemotional competence. Self-esteem, physical activity level, interpersonal regulation, and motivation were higher in the urban environment. However, the three dimensions of health literacy were higher in rural areas, as well as self-regulation. With respect to size, the effect was high for almost all variables except for some of the socioemotional competencies.
There were no differences with respect to sex in any of the dependent variables analyzed in either the urban or rural setting, except for empathy in the urban setting ( x ¯ ♂ = 2.70; x ¯ ♀ = 2.12; sig. = 0.037). In the urban setting the level of self-perception of health was negatively related to the dimensions of health literacy (care R = −0.462; prevention r = −0.345, and promotion = −0.433; AS = −0.393).
Among the youths participating in the educational organization in the urban center, 51.6% had been hospitalized once, 36.3% twice, and 12.1% three or more times. Seventy percent had been to the emergency department once, 26.4% twice, and 3.3% three or more times. Among young people living in rural areas who were not involved in the educational organization, no one had ever been hospitalized, and 74.4% had been to the emergency department once and 25.6% twice. No one had ever been hospitalized three or more times. Regarding self-perception of health, among young people participating in the educational organization, no one had a poor or poor perception of their health, 28.6% had a good perception of their health, and 71.4% had a high perception of their health. Among youths who were not involved in the educational organization, 1.1% had a poor self-perception of their health, 4.4 poor, 21.1 good, and 73.3% high. Therefore, there were no differences in self-perception of health (Chi-squared = 0.107). Regarding the physical exercise of the youths who were involved in the educational organization, 5.5% never exercised, 18.7% exercised occasionally, and 75.8% exercised frequently. With respect to the youths who were not involved in the educational organization, 2.2% never performed physical activity, 43.3% occasionally, and 54.4% frequently. Table 4 shows the frequencies and significant Chi-square results that demonstrate the association between the different categorical variables.
In both rural and urban areas (Table 5), the age of the children correlated positively, significantly, but lowly with health care, so it seems that the older the child, the higher the health literacy in this dimension is. Self-esteem correlated with the level of physical activity, but with none of the health variables nor with the socioemotional competencies, neither did the level of physical activity or the dimensions of health literacy or socioemotional competencies. As would be expected, the factors of the same scale correlated highly and positively with each other, except for interpersonal regulation with motivation, self-awareness, and conflict resolution, and the same occurred with motivation, self-awareness, and conflict resolution.

4. Discussion

The purpose of this study was to compare the sports, health, and physiological characteristics of at-risk youths from urban and rural settings in Guatemala. The study established a criterion for the current development of these characteristics in the participants. The following categories are presented based on the data analysis.

4.1. Participant Landscape

Being a multiethnic (Mayan, Garifuna, Xinca, and Ladino) country, Guatemala is composed of twenty-five cultural groups regarding the historical social development of Guatemalans [57]. The youths participating in this study came from urban and rural areas; however, most of the participants who participate in the educational organization were from rural areas nationwide [43]. This is caused by the displacement to the city because of the high rates of unemployment and limited academic training, as it is more important to work to satisfy their basic needs as result of their precarious living conditions [45]. The income of families in rural areas is much higher than youths living in urban areas because the poorest families that come from the rural areas can be residents of the urban areas of Guatemala City due to the need to improve their living conditions, and by residing in prioritized neighborhoods, they can participate in the organization. The participants reported that their income comes mostly from the employment of their parents, and a few of them had no formal income because of not having sufficient academic training, which can cause them to become involved in criminal activities and other antisocial behaviors to satisfy their needs. The participants reported having completed two levels of education, and only a few of them did not have any formal education. This correlates with the evidence of a previous study that showed that most of the at-risk youths are not employed, while others work in formal or informal economies as a result of their poor academic background [57]. Most of the participants did not have vocational training since the institutions in charge request certain academic requirements, which means that their chances of integrating into formal employment will be difficult in the future by already limiting their access to better life opportunities. The academic background of the participants’ parents suggests that at least they had access to one educational stage or technical training to become part of the formal or informal economy. The participants’ religious beliefs showed that Catholicism was the dominant religion.

4.2. Level of Self-Regulation

Self-regulation (the ability to control emotions and behavior according to the situation) within Guatemalan families is a daily practice in the urban and rural cities around the country since racism and discrimination have been a constant feature since the Spanish invasion in the 15th Century [58]. However, it is much higher in rural areas because of the values of each person are fundamental for their development from the daily life standpoint. The multiple ancestral values in each person are developed from their constant and intrinsic evolution, not leaving aside those officially offered by the state. There are asymmetrical relationships in the transmission of cultural traits between what people generate within themselves and what the government establishes; these values are developed in a traditional way (e.g., values such as dialogue and respect, which are essential for the Mayan peoples, allow the elaboration of judgments that self-regulate learning from the sociocultural reality of these people). This means that youths in Guatemala learn to control their emotions and behaviors based on the experience of their own culture (e.g., family) and those required by their community (e.g., the government).

4.3. Participants’ Health Literacy

Regarding emergency services, the at-risk youths in Guatemala did not report a significant attendance at health and emergency medical centers. This is a result of the fact that, in urban areas, private health costs are high; the practice of self-medication and public services can be considered precarious. In rural areas, the cultural traditions of the communities are transmitted to the youths in which local healers are consulted before governmental health services. Additionally, in the rural areas, the scarce emergency services cannot meet the demands of the population. The high rates of health literacy in rural areas is due the youths benefitting from the double impact of two cultural systems: (i) based on the information promoted by the national public health system and (ii) the information promoted by the traditional medicine of their community. Health and sports are human needs that are associated with and self-regulated by this historical knowledge within each person. In the case of health, the traditional medicine of Mayas (e.g., midwives, healers) self-regulates their values by the autochthonous knowledge despite the policies of prevention, promotion, healing, and rehabilitation of the official Western medicine. In the urban areas, these results decrease because the youths have access to other sources of health promotion, and for this reason, state policy does not focus their major efforts in this area. Participants in the sports-based intervention have not had an impact on their health awareness as a result of the programming of the organization, which is based on teaching values and not on increasing the health literacy of the participants [43,59]. The age of the youths correlated positively with health care and attention in both rural and urban areas, so it seems that the older the child, the higher the literacy in this dimension is.

4.4. Participants’ Physical Activity

Youths participating in the educational organization mostly practice sports when they have access to safe spaces (e.g., sports facilities, gymnasiums) provided by institutions, so they depend on them for practicing physical activity [21,60,61]. This is also a consequence of the violence and crime rates in the urban areas where they live in the city, which results in their parents not allowing them to go outside without supervision, and this limitation results in low rates of physical and health literacy [57]. While young people in rural areas perform organized physical activity (e.g., physical education) in their educational centers due to the lack of adequate sports facilities in their localities, it is important to note that most young people in rural areas do not participate in organized physical activity (e.g., sports) outside their educational centers as a result of the limited existence of youth programs in their communities. However, it is important to note that the concept of physical activity varies in the rural area, since young people who engage in activities such as walking, working agriculture, and others do so as a part of their daily lives. Self-esteem, as in other studies [62], shows that youths participating in the educational organization in urban areas have higher self-esteem, and in rural areas it is decreased. This happens because of culture-related conditions, as the youths participating in the educational organization obtain recognition for their achievements on a constant basis (e.g., academic, sports), while in the rural area, obtaining recognition is much more complicated as result of their cultural settings. Physical activity produced a higher empathy and socioemotional competence in men participating in the educational organization as a result of using and standardized educational curriculum through sports.

5. Conclusions

The results of the comparative study of the characteristics of youths participating in the educational organization or not showed that the level of physical activity, socioemotional competencies, and self-esteem of at-risk youths in Guatemala was especially low. However, the at-risk youths participating in the sports for education organization developed more self-esteem, and their levels of physical activity were higher than their peers not participating in the sports for education organization; the socioemotional competencies of self-regulation and motivation were higher in urban areas; empathy was higher in men than in women; the level of self-perception of health was lower and health literacy higher. In some variables of the study, rural Guatemalan youths scored better than those in urban areas. The youths not participating in the educational organization developed a set of attitudes, knowledge, skills, and abilities as result of their historical development and sociocultural strategies for health and physical activity.
The transmission of strategies takes place through human development which comprises education and cultural traits transmitted from generation to generation in rural areas from three elements: the form, function, and meaning of these traits: (i) what is visible about the trait, (ii) the need that it solves, and (iii) the ideas that are around that trait. The development of the culture of physical activity and health is established from interculturality based on the values of each of the four peoples that make up the Guatemalan nation. It is advisable not to use the concept of intervention, but to establish collaboration from a relationship at the same intercultural level in the case of countries of the Global South.
The use of physical activity (e.g., sports, physical education, and recreation) to foster the health of at-risk youths can become a good strategy for community development by establishing pedagogical tools according to the local needs for health literacy education (e.g., health services, the recognition of the symptoms of common diseases, and the prevention of non-communicable diseases) for improving the quality of life of the Guatemalan youths, especially those at-risk.

6. Limitations

The study design tried to neutralize the limitations of the study, mainly those affecting the generalizability of the data and researcher bias. Firstly, it must be considered that the study collected data from participants within an educational organization and non-participants residing in rural Guatemala. Secondly, although most of the participants were from rural areas, the institution under study is in an urban environment. Thirdly, we must consider the intervention of extraneous variables that could have mediated the results; therefore, the differences between the youths that participate and those that do not are not due to the effectiveness of the program, but could be a result of the influence of these variables.

7. Future Research

This study was exploratory in nature; it could be interesting to extend the study with qualitative data to explain the findings and help to interpret them more rigorously. Therefore, in future studies, it is intended to consider the voices of other stakeholders such as coaches, parents, or volunteers to triangulate the results and control possible variables that could influence the results. Furthermore, research could be oriented towards the analysis of similar experiences in different geographical regions that use sports as a tool to promote wider social benefits to consolidate the scientific evidence and incorporate other populations as participants in the research, which may allow the saturation of information on the subject. On the other hand, new studies could examine a broader range of issues related to conflict and violence faced by at-risk youths. The results of this study can serve as a diagnostic tool for the design of programs with groups of at-risk adolescents in Guatemala and countries with similar cultural and social characteristics, as well as the evaluation of their possible impact.

Author Contributions

P.D.P.N., I.P.-P. and M.J.M.-P. elaborated the study; I.P.-P. and M.J.M.-P. supervised the protocol; P.D.P.N., I.P.-P. and M.J.M.-P. selected and validated the questionnaire; P.D.P.N. collected the data; I.P.-P. analyzed the data; P.D.P.N., I.P.-P. and M.J.M.-P. interpreted the results of the research; I.P.-P. designed the figure and tables; P.D.P.N. and I.P.-P. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; M.J.M.-P. provided revision and edits to the content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marlon Vitelo Escobar Herrera for his support in contacting the parents and children in Momostenango and the participants from Guatemala City that were part of this study. Furthermore, we thank Hector Rafael Haussler Paredes for providing comments and thoughts to improve this document. The authors thank their colleagues at GIES-10 for their support in the study by providing advice and comments, which contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in this manuscript was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Powers, A.; Casey, B.J. The Adolescent Brain and the Emergence and Peak of Psychopathology. J. Infant Child Adolesc. Psychother. 2015, 14, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arslan, G. Mediating Role of the Self–Esteem and Resilience in the Association between Social Exclusion and Life Satisfaction among Adolescents. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2019, 151, 109514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Austen, L. The Social Construction of Risk by Young People. Health Risk Soc. 2009, 11, 451–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Paakkari, L.T.; Torppa, M.P.; Paakkari, O.-P.; Välimaa, R.S.; Ojala, K.S.A.; Tynjälä, J.A. Does Health Literacy Explain the Link between Structural Stratifiers and Adolescent Health? Eur. J. Public Health 2019, 29, 919–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moksnes, U.K.; Espnes, G.A. Self-Esteem and Life Satisfaction in Adolescents—Gender and Age as Potential Moderators. Qual. Life Res. 2013, 22, 2921–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jafarigiv, S.; Peyman, N. The Effect of Life Skills Training with Health Literacy Strategies on Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy in Female Students during Puberty. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2022, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bruner, M.W.; McLaren, C.D.; Sutcliffe, J.T.; Gardner, L.A.; Lubans, D.R.; Smith, J.J.; Vella, S.A. The effect of sport-based interventions on positive youth development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2021, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jones, G.J.; Edwards, M.B.; Bocarro, J.N.; Bunds, K.S.; Smith, J.W. An integrative review of sport-based youth development literature. Sport Soc. 2016, 20, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sherry, E.; Schulenkorf, N.; Chalip, L. Managing sport for social change: The state of play. Sport Manag. Rev. 2015, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lyras, A.; Peachey, J.W. Integrating sport-for-development theory and praxis. Sport Manag. Rev. 2011, 14, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peachey, J.W.; Cunningham, G.B.; Lyras, A.; Cohen, A.; Bruening, J. The Influence of a Sport-for-Peace Event on Prejudice and Change Agent Self-Efficacy. J. Sport Manag. 2015, 29, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anderson-Butcher, D. Youth Sport as a Vehicle for Social Development. Kinesiol. Rev. 2019, 8, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kwak, Y.; Lu, T.; Christ, S.L. Organized and Unstructured Activity Participation Among Adolescents Involved with Child Protective Services in the United States. Child Care Q. 2017, 46, 495–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sugden, J. Teaching and Playing Sport for Conflict Resolution and Co-Existence in Israel. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2006, 41, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sugden, J. Critical left-realism and sport interventions in divided societies. Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport 2010, 45, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sugden, J.; Tomlinson, A. Sport and Peace-Building in Divided Societies, 1st ed.; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Etzion, D.; Romi, S. Typology of youth at risk. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2015, 59, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carratalá, V.; Marco-Ahulló, A.; Carratalá, I.; Carratalá, H.; Bermejo, J.-L. Judo as a tool for social integration in adolescents at risk of social exclusion: A pilot study. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2019, 15, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eather, N.; Morgan, P.J.; Lubans, D.R. Effects of exercise on mental health outcomes in adolescents: Findings from the CrossFit™ teens randomized controlled trial. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2016, 26, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Benavides, S.; Caballero, J. Ashtanga yoga for children and adolescents for weight management and psychological well being: An uncontrolled open pilot study. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2009, 15, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mandigo, J.; Corlett, J.; Holt, N.; van Ingen, C.; Geisler, G.; MacDonald, D.; Higgs, C. The Impact of the Hoodlinks Programme on Developing Life Skills and Preventing Youth Violence in Guatemala City. J. Sport Dev. 2018, 6, 21–37. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sugden, J.P. Belfast United: Encouraging Cross-Community Relations through Sport in Northern Ireland. J. Sport Soc. Issues 1991, 15, 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sugden, J. Sport and community relations in Northern Ireland. Manag. Leis. 1997, 2, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Owen, M.; Greeff, A.P. Factors Attracting and Discouraging Adolescent Boys in High-Prevalence Communities From Becoming Involved in Gangs. J. Forensic Psychol. Pract. 2015, 15, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Busiol, D.; Lee, T.Y. Promotion of Bonding Among Peers. In Student Well-Being in Chinese Adolescents in Hong Kong; Springer: Singapore, 2015; pp. 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blossom, J.B.; Adrian, M.C.; Stoep, A.V.; McCauley, E. Mechanisms of Change in the Prevention of Depression: An Indicated School-Based Prevention Trial at the Transition to High School. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2019, 59, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lyras, A.; Welty Peachey, J. The Conception, Development and Application of Sport-For-Development Theory. In Routledge Handbook of Theory in Sport Management; Cunningham, G.B., Fink, J.S., Doherty, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; pp. 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seixas, S.R.d.C.; Renk, M.; Hoefel, J.L.d.M.; Asmus, G.F. Social Projects and the Internalization of Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Concepts for the Improvement of Quality of Life. In Social Responsibility and Sustainability; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Legg, E. The purpose of sport: Perspectives of players, coaches, parents, and administrators. Manag. Sport Leis. 2020, 26, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lyras, A. Characteristics and Psycho-Social Impacts of an Inter-Ethnic Educational Sport Iniitiative on Greek and Turkish Cypriot Youth. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, CT, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lyras, A. Olympism for humanity theory and praxis: A call for peace and democracy champions of change. Peace Conflict J. Peace Psychol. 2021, 27, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lyras, A. Olympism for Humanity in Action Theory: Bridging the Olympic Divide by Putting Ideals into Action—An Academic Call from the Past to Pave the Pathway for the Future. Sport Olymp. Paralympic Stud. J. 2020, 5, 400–410. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hunt, M.K.; Hopko, D.R. Predicting High School Truancy Among Students in the Appalachian South. J. Prim. Prev. 2009, 30, 549–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Faulkner, G.E.J.; Adlaf, E.M.; Irving, H.M.; Allison, K.R.; Dwyer, J. School Disconnectedness: Identifying Adolescents at Risk in Ontario, Canada. J. Sch. Health 2009, 79, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jarkiewicz, A. Empowering Youth At-Risk in School through Participatory Methods of Work Developed within the Fys-Forums1 Project -Research Findings. Czech Slovak Soc. Work. 2019, 19, 22–33. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gold, J.; Hocking, J.; Hellard, M. The feasibility of recruiting young men in rural areas from community football clubs for STI screening. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2007, 31, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Spaaij, R.; Oxford, S.; Jeanes, R. Transforming communities through sport? critical pedagogy and sport for development. Sport Educ. Soc. 2016, 21, 570–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Coalter, F. Sport for Development: What Game Are We Playing? Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Spaaij, R.; Schulenkorf, N. Cultivating Safe Space: Lessons for Sport-for-Development Projects and Events. J. Sport Manag. 2014, 28, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haudenhuyse, R.P.; Theeboom, M.; Coalter, F. The potential of sports-based social interventions for vulnerable youth: Implications for sport coaches and youth workers. J. Youth Stud. 2012, 15, 437–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spruit, A.; Van Der Put, C.; Van Vugt, E.; Stams, G.J. Predictors of Intervention Success in a Sports-Based Program for Adolescents at Risk of Juvenile Delinquency. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 2018, 62, 1535–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ponciano Nuñez, P.D. Peacebuilding through Olympism: A Case Study Analysis of a Youth Development Foundation in Colombia. In Olympic Studies 26th International Seminar on Olympic Studies for Posgraduate Students; Konstantinos, G., Ed.; International Olympic Academy: Diethnis Olympiaki, Greece, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  43. Núñez, P.D.P.; Portela-Pino, I.; Martínez-Patiño, M.J. A descriptive analysis of the sport, health, and psychological characteristics of at-risk youth in Guatemala. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2098626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Scarnato, J.M. Deportation meets development: A case study of return migration in Guatemala. Migr. Dev. 2018, 8, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ley, C.; Barrio, M.R. Interculturalism through Physical Activity and Sports in Cooperation for Development. Int. J. Sport Soc. 2010, 1, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ponciano Nuñez, P.D. Influencias olímpicas modernas: Olimpismo para el desarrollo y paz en guatemala. Citius Altius 2021, 14, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Repetto, E.; Lozano, S.; Fernández Berrocal, P.; Extremera, N.; Mudarra, M.J.; Morales, E. Formación En Competencias Socioemocionales; La Muralla: Olancho, Honduras, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kowalski, K.C.; Crocker, P.R.; Kowalski, N.P. Convergent Validity of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 1997, 9, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Martínez-Gómez, D.; Martínez-de-Haro, V.; Pozo, T.; Welk, G.J.; Villagra, A.; Calle, M.E.; Marcos, A.; Veiga, O.L. Fiabilidad y Validez Del Cuestionario de Actividad Física PAQ-A En Adolescentes Españoles. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 2009, 83, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, S.-R.; Lee, Y.-J.; Chiu, H.-W.; Jeng, C. Impact of physical activity on heart rate variability in children with type 1 diabetes. Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2007, 24, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chahla, S.E.; Frohnert, B.I.; Thomas, W.; Kelly, A.S.; Nathan, B.M.; Polgreen, L.E. Higher daily physical activity is associated with higher osteocalcin levels in adolescents. Prev. Med. Rep. 2015, 2, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Morejón, A.J.; Garcia-Boveda, R.; Vázquez-Morejon, R. Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg: Fiabilidad y Validez En Población Clínica Española. Apunt. Psicol. 2004, 22, 247–256. [Google Scholar]
  53. Noblejas de la Flor, M. Meaning in Life, the Evolutive Dimension. Empirical Findings with New Norms for the Purpose in Life (PIL) Test in Spain. J. Transpers. Res. 2011, 3, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  54. Noblejas de la Flor, M. Logoterapia. Fundamentos, Principios y Aplicación. Una Experiencia de Evaluación Del “logro Interior de Sentido, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. 2022. Available online: http://eprints.ucm.es/tesis/19911996/S/5/S5005701.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2022).
  55. Sørensen, K.; van den Broucke, S.; Fullam, J.; Doyle, G.; Pelikan, J.; Slonska, Z.; Brand, H. Health Literacy and Public Health: A Systematic Review and Integration of Definitions and Models. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sørensen, K.; van den Broucke, S.; Pelikan, J.M.; Fullam, J.; Doyle, G.; Slonska, Z.; Kondilis, B.; Stoffels, V.; Osborne, R.H.; Brand, H. Measuring Health Literacy in Populations: Illuminating the Design and Development Process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). Desafíos y Oportunidades Para Guatemala: Hacia Una Agenda de Futuro. La Celeridad Del Cambio, Una Mirada Territorial Del Desarrollo Humano 2002–2019; United Nations Development Programme: Guatemala City, Guatemala, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Martínez Peláez, S. La Patria sel Criollo; FCE/Guatemala: Guatemala City, Guatemala, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  59. Fuller, C.W.; Junge, A.; DeCelles, J.; Donald, J.; Jankelowitz, R.; Dvorak, J. ’Football for Health’—A Football-Based Health-Promotion Programme for Children in South Africa: A Parallel Cohort Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 2010, 44, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lyras, A. Olympic Education in Practice: Educational Components of a Sports for Peacebuilding Intervention. In Olympism, Olympic Education and Learning Legacies; Chatziefstathiou, D., Müller, N., Eds.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle, UK, 2014; pp. 245–259. [Google Scholar]
  61. Welty Peachey, J.; Lyras, A.; Borland, J.; Cohen, A. Street Soccer USA Cup: Preliminary Findings of a Sport-for-Homeless Intervention. ICHPER SD J. Res. Health Phys. Educ. Recreat. Sport Danc. 2013, 8, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  62. Shima, T.; Tai, K.; Nakao, H.; Shimofure, T.; Arai, Y.; Kiyama, K.; Onizawa, Y. Asociación Entre La Empatía Autoinformada y La Experiencia Deportiva En Adultos Jóvenes. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2021, 21, 66–72. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Source of family income as a function of participation in the educational organization.
Table 1. Source of family income as a function of participation in the educational organization.
Chi-Square = 0.0001Participating: N = 90Not Participating: N = 91
IncomeFrequencyPercentageFrequencyPercentage
EUR 500 66.75661.5
EUR 501–1000 7280.03336.3
EUR 10011213.322.2
Table
Table 2. Physical activity level, health literacy, socioemotional competencies, and self-esteem in at-risk youths in Guatemala.
Table 2. Physical activity level, health literacy, socioemotional competencies, and self-esteem in at-risk youths in Guatemala.
NMin.Max.MedianDSSim.Kurtosis
Self-esteem18110.0037.0021.5084.330.0571.288
PAQ (PAQ: Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents)1812.004.782.8780.5300.8230.425
Attention181−16.6750.0027.37112.37−0.6950.997
Prevention181−16.6750.0026.69713.24−0.6020.894
Promotion181−16.6750.0026.73813.27−0.7781.009
HL (HL: Health Literacy)181−16.6750.0026.93511.82−0.7781.489
Interpersonal regulation1811.675.003.3520.6390.235−0.099
Motivation1811.005.003.6770.717−0.3680.158
Self-awareness 1811.005.003.4130.711−0.0950.405
Conflict resolution 1811.404.803.2110.567−0.3550.647
Teamwork1810.004.002.6250.885−0.7810.847
Empathy1810.004.002.5560.912−0.555−0.058
Self-regulation1810.004.002.5820.974−0.7550.124
SEC (SECs: Socioemotional Competence)1811.964.303.0590.434−0.036−0.160
Table
Table 3. Disparities in the amount of physical activity, health literacy, socioemotional competencies, and self-esteem between urban and rural areas.
Table 3. Disparities in the amount of physical activity, health literacy, socioemotional competencies, and self-esteem between urban and rural areas.
AreaNMedianDSTSig.ES
Self-esteemUrban9122.1974.4502.1490.0330.6452
Rural9020.8114.226
PAQUrban912.9690.5912.3360.0210.7788
Rural902.7870.444
AttentionUrban9124.23314.793−3.5480.0011.778
Rural9030.5448.268
PreventionUrban9124.84716.185−1.9090.0581.949
Rural9028.5679.099
PromotionUrban9124.38115.918−2.4400.0161.941
Rural9029.1209.419
HLUrban9124.48714.077−2.8640.0051.718
Rural9029.4108.362
Interpersonal regulationUrban913.5180.7273.6270.0000.9184
Rural903.1850.484
MotivationUrban914.0330.6217.7130.0000.923
Rural903.3180.624
Self-awarenessUrban913.4940.8061.5520.1230.1056
Rural903.3310.595
Conflict resolutionUrban913.2650.6811.3150.1900.839
Rural903.1550.418
TeamworkUrban912.5201.075−1.6080.1100.1307
Rural902.7310.628
EmpathyUrban912.4631.103−1.3830.1690.1349
Rural902.6500.660
Self-regulationUrban912.3641.163−3.0990.0020.1411
Rural902.8020.673
SECUrban913.0940.4941.0790.2820.644
Rural903.0240.363
Table
Table 4. Calculation of frequencies and association between health variables as a function of the participation in the educational organization or not of at-risk youths.
Table 4. Calculation of frequencies and association between health variables as a function of the participation in the educational organization or not of at-risk youths.
AreaNo. of Hospital AdmissionsTotalChi-Squared
123+
Urban473311910.0001
Rural900090
Total1373311181
Emergency services
Urban64243910.214
Rural6723090
Total131473181
Practice of physical exercise
Urban51769910.001
Rural2394990
Total756118181
Table
Table 5. Pearson correlations between the different dependent variables with age.
Table 5. Pearson correlations between the different dependent variables with age.
Age12345678910111213
Self-esteem (1)R0.0231
Sig.0.762
PAQ (PAQ: Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents) (2)R−0.050−0.190 *1
Sig.0.5040.011
Attention (3)R0.159 *0.0470.0121
Sig.0.0330.5290.878
Prevention (4)R0.0840.092−0.0290.773 **1
Sig.0.2630.2200.6940.000
Promotion (5)R0.067−0.0230.0980.707 **0.760 **1
Sig.0.3700.7590.1880.0000.000
HL (HL: Health Literacy) (6)R0.1120.0420.0300.902 **0.928 **0.905 **1
Sig.0.1340.5740.6910.0000.0000.000
Interpersonal regulation (7)R−0.105−0.0580.123−0.096−0.025−0.009−0.0461
Sig.0.1600.4350.1000.1990.7390.9000.536
Motivation (8)R−0.142−0.0680.084−0.102−0.0050.018−0.0310.589 **1
Sig.0.0560.3630.2620.1700.9420.8140.6770.000
Self-
awareness (9)		R−0.004−0.1270.083−0.074−0.039−0.010−0.0440.526 **0.623 **1
Sig.0.9570.0880.2650.3200.6020.8910.5530.0000.000
Conflict
resolution (10)		R0.050−0.0960.052−0.115−0.162 *−0.093−0.1360.321 **0.391 **0.346 **1
Sig.0.5000.2000.4860.1220.0290.2130.0690.0000.0000.000
Teamwork (11)R0.1030.0260.0380.695 **0.735 **0.790 **0.813 **−0.0480.019−0.007−0.0891
Sig.0.1670.7300.6150.0000.0000.0000.0000.5240.8050.9270.233
Empathy (12)R0.0740.135−0.0150.751 **0.874 **0.625 **0.822 **−0.018−0.033−0.073−0.1410.593 **1
Sig.0.3250.0690.8380.0000.0000.0000.0000.8130.6590.3270.0590.000
Self-
regulation (13)		R0.1140.068−0.0580.829 **0.761 **0.638 **0.812 **−0.086−0.065−0.084−0.0980.598 **0.741 **1
Sig.0.1260.3650.4360.0000.0000.0000.0000.2520.3830.2610.1900.0000.000
SEC (Socioemotional Competence) (14)R0.042−0.0060.0620.610 **0.674 **0.604 **0.691 **0.485 **0.553 **0.505 **0.328 **0.637 **0.655 **0.645 **
Sig.0.5790.9350.4030.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
*, ** refers to p < 0.05, p < 0.01.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nuñez, P.D.P.; Portela-Pino, I.; Martínez-Patiño, M.J. Understanding the Characteristics of At-Risk Youths in Guatemala: Evidence from a Sports for Human Development Program. Children 2023, 10, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010134

AMA Style

Nuñez PDP, Portela-Pino I, Martínez-Patiño MJ. Understanding the Characteristics of At-Risk Youths in Guatemala: Evidence from a Sports for Human Development Program. Children. 2023; 10(1):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nuñez, Pedro Danilo Ponciano, Iago Portela-Pino, and María José Martínez-Patiño. 2023. "Understanding the Characteristics of At-Risk Youths in Guatemala: Evidence from a Sports for Human Development Program" Children 10, no. 1: 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010134

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop