Next Article in Journal
Thyroid Hormone Therapy for Potential Heart Donors: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trials
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Glycolysis-Related Genes in MAFLD and Their Immune Infiltration Implications: A Multi-Omics Analysis with Experimental Validation
Previous Article in Journal
Variations in Prehospital Analgesic Use Based on Pain Etiology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Role of GDF-15 in Diabetes and Obesity: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Cohort from the KDEP Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Al-Lahham et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651

by
Yusra Al-Lahham
1,
Waldemar Volanski
1,2,
Liana Signorini
1,2,
Ademir Luiz do Prado
1,3,
Glaucio Valdameri
1,
Vivian Rotuno Moure
1,
Marciane Welter
1,
Alexessander C. Alves
4,
Marcel Henrique Marcondes Sari
1,
Fabiane Gomes de Moraes Rego
1 and
Geraldo Picheth
1,*
1
Graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil
2
Laboratory Division, Curitiba City Hall, Curitiba 80530-908, Brazil
3
Federal Institute of Parana, Colombo 83403-515, Brazil
4
School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(7), 1621; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071621
Submission received: 20 June 2025 / Accepted: 20 June 2025 / Published: 2 July 2025

1. Error in Table

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Table 4. Reference interval for 1,5-AG/glycated albumin ratio (AGI), as published. The mistake which was made was in the pregnant women values. The corrected Table 4 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

2. Error in Table S3

In the original publication, there was a mistake in Table S3. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin ratio and comparison between sexes, as published. The mistake which was made was in the 1,5-AG/GA mean ± SD values. The corrected Table S3 appears below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected.

3. Table Title

In the original publication, there was a mistake in the title for Table S4. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin ratio and comparison between sexes. The correct title appears below. All values in the original Table S4 are correct. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected.

Reference

  1. Al-Lahham, Y.; Volanski, W.; Signorini, L.; Prado, A.L.d.; Valdameri, G.; Moure, V.R.; Welter, M.; Alves, A.C.; Sari, M.H.M.; Rego, F.G.d.M.; et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 4. Reference interval for 1,5-AG/glycated albumin ratio (AGI).
Table 4. Reference interval for 1,5-AG/glycated albumin ratio (AGI).
AgeM/FnRI90% Lower90% UpperMeanMedian
Children
6–14 y150/1492991.2–4.30.9–1.44.2–4.82.452.59
Adults
21–62 y146/1442900.9–3.60.6–1.23.3–4.01.912.12
Non-pregnant individuals
6–62 y296/2935891.1–4.00.8–1.23.8–4.22.152.35
Pregnant women **
14–44 y4060.8–3.10.7–0.92.9–3.31.561.67
M/F: male/female; n: sample size; ** weeks of gestation: 16–37, RI: reference interval, calculated with a non-parametric percentile method (2.5–97.5%), and 90% lower and upper, 90% confidence interval. 1,5-AG/GA ratio was calculated with biomarkers in µg/mL and %, respectively. Normality was rejected by Kolmogorov–Smirnov (p < 0.001) for all groups.
Table S3. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin ratio and comparison between sexes.
Table S3. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin ratio and comparison between sexes.
GroupSexn1,5-AG/GA Mean ± SDp
Children (control)Male1502.81 ± 0.810.004
Female1492.56 ± 0.68
T1D childrenMale720.17 ± 0.170.083
Female760.12 ± 0.11
Adults (control)Male1462.92 ± 2.630.001
Female1442.08 ± 1.38
T1D adultsMale340.21 ± 0.710.788
Female470.17 ± 0.62
T2D adultsMale790.23 ± 0.190.487
Female2040.25 ± 0.25
1n: sample size; T1D: type 1 diabetes; T2D: type 2 diabetes. 1,5-Anhydroglucitol (µg/mL) and glycated albumin (%) ratio. Comparisons were made by two-tailed Student’s t-test. Significant values (p < 0.05) are marked in bold.
Table S4. Glycated albumin and HbA1c ratio and comparison between sexes.
Table S4. Glycated albumin and HbA1c ratio and comparison between sexes.
GroupSexnGA/HbA1c Mean ± SDp
Children (control)Male1502.32 ± 0.410.072
Female1492.23 ± 0.45
T1D childrenMale722.97 ± 0.460.309
Female762.90 ± 0.32
Adults (control)Male1462.21 ± 0.990.202
Female1442.39 ± 1.38
T1D adultsMale343.04 ± 1.150.457
Female472.86 ± 1.01
T2D adultsMale792.65 ± 0.500.157
Female2042.55 ± 0.53
1n: sample size; T1D: type 1 diabetes; T2D: type 2 diabetes. Glycated albumin (%) and HbA1c (%) ratio. Comparisons were made by two-tailed Student’s t-test. Significant values are presented as p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Lahham, Y.; Volanski, W.; Signorini, L.; Prado, A.L.d.; Valdameri, G.; Moure, V.R.; Welter, M.; Alves, A.C.; Sari, M.H.M.; Rego, F.G.d.M.; et al. Correction: Al-Lahham et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071621

AMA Style

Al-Lahham Y, Volanski W, Signorini L, Prado ALd, Valdameri G, Moure VR, Welter M, Alves AC, Sari MHM, Rego FGdM, et al. Correction: Al-Lahham et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(7):1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Lahham, Yusra, Waldemar Volanski, Liana Signorini, Ademir Luiz do Prado, Glaucio Valdameri, Vivian Rotuno Moure, Marciane Welter, Alexessander C. Alves, Marcel Henrique Marcondes Sari, Fabiane Gomes de Moraes Rego, and et al. 2025. "Correction: Al-Lahham et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651" Biomedicines 13, no. 7: 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071621

APA Style

Al-Lahham, Y., Volanski, W., Signorini, L., Prado, A. L. d., Valdameri, G., Moure, V. R., Welter, M., Alves, A. C., Sari, M. H. M., Rego, F. G. d. M., & Picheth, G. (2025). Correction: Al-Lahham et al. Reference Interval for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-AG/GA, and GA/HbA1c Ratios and Cut-Off Values for Type 1, Type 2, and Gestational Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2651. Biomedicines, 13(7), 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop