Next Article in Journal
Additive Manufacturing of a Flexible Carbon Monoxide Sensor Based on a SnO2-Graphene Nanoink
Next Article in Special Issue
DFO@EVOH and 3,4-HP@EVOH: Towards New Polymeric Sorbents for Iron(III)
Previous Article in Journal
A Sensitive Impedimetric Sensor Based on Biosourced Polyphosphine Films for the Detection of Lead Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Chemical Reagents for Sensor Design and Development

Department of Chemistry, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
Chemosensors 2020, 8(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020035
Submission received: 21 May 2020 / Accepted: 22 May 2020 / Published: 25 May 2020

1. Introduction

The combination of selective chemical reagents with sensitive physical transducers can often bring about new sensor designs and novel device construction that are capable of quantitative analysis of various sample matrices to determine important ionic or molecular analytes [1]. A simple squaramide chemodosimeter for Cu2+ is based on selective chelation that induces the formation of a highly colored zwitterionic radical for visual and selective sensing of Cu2+ at neutral pH [2]. A sophisticated NO3 sensor is built on the field-effect transistor device with reduced graphene oxide nanosheets that uses benzyl triethylammonium chloride as a capture probe [3]. Optical sensors based on different detection principles for monitoring water quality parameters usually rely on the addition of reagents [4]. Efficient design of new chemical sensors often requires a comprehension of all reagents that are crucial to successful development and validation. Functional reagents may be chromogenic, derivatizing, fluorogenic, imaging, reactive, redox, and even specific in their chemical functionality. A critical choice of the most appropriate reagent can help the manufacturing engineer or research scientist go a long way towards cost-effective production and valid applications. Suitable reagents may span across biochemical, inorganic, organic, and polymeric substances that are either commercially available for immediate use or synthetically facile to prepare in the lab. Proper use of each reagent may be governed by pH, temperature, solvent, redox, enzyme, light, ultrasound, magnetic field, and safety concerns. Both logical deduction and creative thinking can bring about novelty in a unique way that reagents may work synergistically towards a target analyte.

2. The Special Issue

This special issue focuses on the latest advances in chemical reagents that can facilitate the design and development of new sensors. Different kinds of ion complexing and molecular association agents may be presented together with their immobilization on a transducer surface. Surface modification can enhance the properties and characteristics of nanoparticles through functionalization with a natural biomolecule, polymer, dendron, small-molecule ligand or atomic layer, which enable them to play a new role in the field of nanoparticles-based biosensors/bioassays [5,6,7]. All crucial working parameters may be elaborated to achieve the best possible selectivity and highest practical sensitivity in chemical analysis. Practical applications and potential developments may be discussed to encourage further advance in this field of research.
For instance, 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES) is a versatile agent for modifying the surface chemistry of amorphous Si:H sensors for NaCl and bovine serum albumin [8]. APTES can assist the synthesis of silver nanoparticles using polyethyleneimine as a template for detecting Hg2+ by localized surface plasmon resonance light scattering technology [9]. A surface plasmon resonance-based human fetuin-A immunoassay involves the amino groups of APTES-functionalized Au chip that are cross-linked to the carboxyl groups of anti-HFA antibody using 1-ethyl-3-dimethylaminopropyl carbodiimide hydrochloride and sulfo-N-hydroxy succinimide [10]. Adsorption of APTES on ZnO nanoparticles augments its fluorescence due to the electron transfer; however, adsorption of APTES on Fe2O3 nanoparticles quenches its fluorescence due to the electron transfer [11,12]. Biotin-Fe3O4 nanoparticles can be applied in electrochemical immunosensor by selectively binding to streptavidin which is pre-linked to biotinylated antibody. The large surface area of nanoparticles and their repeating binding with streptavidin can amplify the signal to provide sensitive detection of the antibody [13]. A novel enzymatic glucose biosensor was fabricated using glucose oxidase immobilized into APTES-reduced graphene oxide [14]. A high-performance gas sensor can be designed using porous WO3 nanotubes with a self-assembled monolayer of APTES that acts as an electron acceptor on the surface to provide specific interaction with NO2 down to 10 ppb [15]. Gas microsensors based on WO3 nanowires silanized with APTES are highly sensitive to ethanol at room temperature via photoactivation and show enhanced selectivity towards other volatile organic compounds including acetone and toluene [16]. Liquid silanization by APTES can be used as an intermediate step, followed by functionalization with molecules bearing ester end groups, to produce a sensor that is sensitive and selective to ammonia gas at room temperature [17]. Upon exposure to ammonia gas, the electrical conductance of ester modified SnO2-APTES increases [18].
Another interesting reagent is o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) that was employed to measure the free amino groups of peptides or proteins by reaction in the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol to generate a fluorescent product [19]. Different forms of homocysteine in urine or plasma can be determined by using OPA as a selective derivatizing agent [20,21]. A fluorescent SiO2 particle-based sensor can successfully determines glutathione in dietary supplements with excellent recoveries [22]. An automated fluorescence sensor has recently been reported for the determination of hydrazine in drinking water based on the reaction between hydrazine and OPA through a unique mechanism at pH = 1.5 [23]. A carbon paste electrode modified by Ni(II) complex-ZrO2 nanoparticles serves as an ultrasensitive electrochemical sensor for the determination of N-acetylcysteine in urine [24].
Other sensing designs include gaseous NH3 detection by the selective formation of blue indophenol dye through modified Berthelot’s reaction on porous paper [25]. A portable test paper, in which o-phenylenediamine as the reactive recognition site and benzothiadiazole as the fluorophore moiety are coupled, can be facilely fabricated for visual detection of oxalyl chloride and phosgene (two toxic gases) in the gas phase [26]. A partially reduced graphene oxide innercoated and fiber-calibrated Fabry–Perot dye resonator is good for biochemical detection of dopamine, nicotine, and single-stranded DNA [27].
In conclusion, this special issue aims to explore new insights on, and unique applications of, chemical reagents for sensor design and development. Potential applications can range from environmental analysis to industrial analysis. We look forward to receiving your new manuscripts in the upcoming weeks for reporting your research work and sharing your scientific wisdom.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all the authors who contribute their scientific articles, and all the reviewers for their professional enthusiasm in reviewing all the manuscripts. I would also like to thank the Chemosensors Editorial Office for giving me the opportunity to edit this Special Issue and for them continuous help in editing it to assure a high quality of journalism.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pietrzak, M. Sensors and bioselective reagents. Ref. Modul. Chem. Mol. Sci. Chem. Eng. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanna, E.; Martínez, L.; Rotger, C.; Blasco, S.; González, J.; García-España, E.; Costa, A. Squaramide-based reagent for selective chromogenic sensing of Cu(II) through a zwitterion radical. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3840–3843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, X.; Pu, H.; Fu, Z.; Sui, X.; Chang, J.; Chen, J.; Mao, S. Real-time and selective detection of nitrates in water using graphene-based field-effect transistor sensors. Environ. Sci. Nano 2018, 5, 1990–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kruse, P. Review on water quality sensors. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 203002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, G.; Wang, J.; Lin, Y.; Wang, J. CHAPTER 14-Nanoparticle-based biosensors and bioassays. In Electrochemical Sensors, Biosensors and their Biomedical Applications; Academic Press/Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 441–457. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, N.; Senapati, S.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, J.; Panda, S. Functionalized vertically aligned ZnO nanorods for application in electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor based pH sensors and label-free immuno-sensors. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2016, 704, 012013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mirsian, S.; Khodadadian, A.; Hedayati, M.; Manzour-Ol-Ajdad, A.; Kalantarinejad, R.; Heitzinger, C. A new method for selective functionalization of silicon nanowire sensors and Bayesian inversion for its parameters. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 142, 111527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hilterhaus, L.; Lipka, T.; Wahn, L.; Trieu, H.K.; Muller, J. Label-free photonic biosensors fabricated with low-loss hydrogenated amorphous silicon resonators. J. Nanophotonics 2013, 7, 073793. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu, J.; Mao, Q.; Gao, L.; Song, G. Localized surface plasmon resonance light-scattering detection of Hg(II) with 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane assisted synthesis of highly stabilized Ag nanoclusters. Analyst 2013, 138, 1637–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dixit, C.K. Surface regeneration of gold-coated chip for highly-reproducible surface plasmon resonance immunoassays. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 52, 1000149. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saravanan, P.; Jayamoorthy, K.; Kumar, S.A. Switch-On fluorescence and photo-induced electron transfer of 3-amino-propyltriethoxysilane to ZnO: Dual applications in sensors and antibacterial activity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saravanana, P.; Jayamoorthy, K.; Anandakumar, S. Fluorescence quenching of APTES by Fe2O3 nanoparticles-Sensor and antibacterial applications. J. Lumin. 2016, 178, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Chu, P.K.; Dong, Y.; Wei, Q. A sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor based on the biotin-streptavidin-biotin structure for detection of human immunoglobulin G. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guler, M.; Turkoglu, V.; Kivanc, M.R. A novel enzymatic glucose biosensor and nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on 3-aminopropyl- triethoxysilane functionalized reduced graphene oxide. Electroanalysis 2017, 29, 2507–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, W.; Xu, L.; Sheng, K.; Chen, C.; Zhou, X.; Dong, B.; Bai, X.; Zhang, S.; Lu, G.; Song, H. APTES-functionalized thin-walled porous WO3 nanotubes for highly selective sensing of NO2 in a polluted environment. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 10976–10989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vallejos, S.; Fohlerová, Z.; Tomić, M.; Gràcia, I.; Figueras, E.; Cané, C. Room temperature ethanol microsensors based on silanized tungsten oxide nanowires. Proceedings 2018, 2, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hijazi, M.; Rieu, M.; Stambouli, V.; Tournier, G.; Viricelle, J.P.; Pijolat, C. Ambient temperature selective ammonia gas sensor based on SnO2-APTES modifications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hijazi, M.; Rieu, M.; Stambouli, V.; Tournier, G.; Viricelle, J.P.; Pijolat, C. Modified SnO2-APTES gas sensor for selective ammonia detection at room temperature. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 6, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thermo Scientific. Fluoraldehyde™ OO-phthaldialdehyde Reagent Solution. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/26025#/26025 (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  20. Lin, J.H.; Chang, C.W.; Tseng, W.L. Fluorescent sensing of homocysteine in urine: Using fluorosurfactant-capped gold nanoparticles and o-phthaldialdehyde. Analyst 2009, 135, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lai, Y.J.; Tseng, W.L. Gold nanoparticle extraction followed by o-phthaldialdehyde derivatization for fluorescence sensing of different forms of homocysteine in plasma. Talanta 2012, 91, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nedeljko, P.; Turel, M.; Lobnik, A. Turn-on fluorescence detection of glutathione based on o-phthaldialdehyde-assisted SiO2 particles. J. Sens. 2018, 1692702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tsiasioti, A.; Tzanavaras, P.D. Automated fluorimetric sensor for hydrazine determination in water samples based on the concept of zone fluidics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Salehi, M.; Faghani, F. Application of novel Ni(II) complex and ZrO2 nanoparticles as mediator for electrocatalytic determination of N-acetylcysteine in drug samples. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Cho, Y.B.; Jeong, S.H.; Chun, H.; Kim, Y.S. Selective colorimetric detection of dissolved ammonia in water via modified Berthelot’s reaction on porous paper. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 266, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, W.Q.; Cheng, K.; Yang, X.; Li, Q.Y.; Zhang, H.; Ma, Z.; Lu, H.; Wu, H.; Wang, X.J. A benzothiadiazole-based fluorescent sensor for selective detection of oxalyl chloride and phosgene. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 1719–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cao, Z.; Yao, B.; Qin, C.; Yang, R.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Bi, L.; Chen, Y.; Xie, Z.; et al. Biochemical sensing in graphene-enhanced microfiber resonators with individual molecule sensitivity and selectivity. Light. Sci. Appl. 2019, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, E.P.C. Chemical Reagents for Sensor Design and Development. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020035

AMA Style

Lai EPC. Chemical Reagents for Sensor Design and Development. Chemosensors. 2020; 8(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Edward P. C. 2020. "Chemical Reagents for Sensor Design and Development" Chemosensors 8, no. 2: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020035

APA Style

Lai, E. P. C. (2020). Chemical Reagents for Sensor Design and Development. Chemosensors, 8(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8020035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop