Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Pyrolyzed Photoresist Carbon Electrodes for Trace Electroanalysis of Nickel(II)
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Automatable Flow System for Paraoxon Detection with an Embedded Screen-Printed Electrode Tailored with Butyrylcholinesterase and Prussian Blue Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arrays of TiO2 Nanowires as Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Hydrazine Detection

*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Santa Marta 2137, 30123 Venice, Italy
Chemosensors 2015, 3(2), 146-156; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors3020146
Submission received: 6 February 2015 / Accepted: 5 May 2015 / Published: 14 May 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Sensors for Environmental and Food Analysis)

Abstract

:
Electrodes based on arrays of TiO2 nanowires were prepared by template sol-gel synthesis with the goal of developing a hydrazine photoelectrochemical sensor. Experimental conditions were chosen so that the gelation reaction occurred inside the nanopores of track-etched polycarbonate membranes, with consequent filling with TiO2 nanowires. Different procedures for the removal of the template were examined, in order to obtain arrays of self-standing TiO2 nanowires. The nanowire arrays were bound to fluorine doped tin oxide substrates to produce handy photoelectrodes. The photocurrent recorded with the photoelectrodes in the presence of hydrazine showed significant dependence on the pollutant concentration. The development of a photoelectrochemical sensor for hydrazine detection in water samples, based on this principle, is presented.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the rapid increase in the environmental pollution caused increasing concern for the natural ecosystems and human health. The public opinion awareness on environmental pollution led to a growing demand of analytical methods for the determination of toxic substances. Hydrazine (N2H4) is an important pollutant which found wide applications in agricultural chemicals (pesticides), pharmaceutical intermediates, photographic chemicals, corrosion preserver in heat exchangers, textile dyes, fuel for rockets, spacecrafts and for emergency power unit of military aircrafts. Hydrazine is also used as precursor for the production of sodium azide, the blowing gas of car airbags. Nevertheless, hydrazine is a highly toxic material. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, acute exposure to hydrazine can lead to temporary blindness, headache, nausea, pulmonary edema, seizures, and coma, while chronic exposure has hepatotoxic and carcinogenic effects [1]. Because of the toxicological significance of hydrazine, the development of highly sensitive and simple analytical methods for the determination of low levels of hydrazine in different samples such as drinking water and industrial effluents is highly desirable. Many methods have been proposed, these include spectrophotometry [2], titrimetry [3], chemiluminescence [4], chromatography [5] and electrochemistry [6,7,8].
In this work we present a new method for the determination of hydrazine, based on photoelectrochemical sensing by using a nanostructured TiO2 photoanode. Photoelectrochemistry has been extensively used in energy harvesting and environmental decontamination [9,10], but recently it has been proposed as a promising analytical tool [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Indeed this technique has been successfully applied for the determination of environmental pollutants [14,15,16,17] and biomolecules [11,12,13,18,19]. Photoelectrochemical analysis employs light as the excitation source and the response in photocurrent as the detection signal; thanks to the different forms of energy use for excitation and detection, this process reduces the background signal [15]. Moreover, the instruments used for photoelectrochemical analysis are simpler and cheaper when compared with those employed for spectroscopic and chromatographic measurements.
In photocatalytic processes, TiO2 can absorb UV photons and promote electrons (e) from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), leaving behind highly oxidative holes (h+).
TiO2 + hν → e + h+
Photogenerated holes and electrons can migrate towards the surface of the TiO2 and react with adsorbed molecules, so that e can take part to reduction and h+ to oxidation reactions. Anyway, most of the photogenerated holes and electrons recombine releasing heat. However, if TiO2 is immobilized on the surface of an electrode and an anodic potential is applied, a charge separation will be induced, so that e will move towards the bulk of the semiconductor and eventually to the counter electrode through the electric circuit, while the h+ will move towards the surface of TiO2. In this way, the recombination events are reduced and only oxidative reactions take place on the surface of the electrode. Most often, h+ react with adsorbed water to generate hydroxyl radicals:
h+ + H2O → ·OH + H+
However, the presence of easily oxidized molecules, such as hydrazine, can provide a more facile pathway for the transfer of the holes through the semiconductor/electrolyte interface, the main result being an increase of the photocurrent. The oxidation mechanism of hydrazine involves the transfer of four electrons from TiO2, with nitrogen and four protons as products:
N2H4 + 4h+ → N2 + 4H+
The photoelectrochemical hydrazine detection mechanism at a TiO2 photoanode is schematized in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Sensing scheme of hydrazine at a TiO2 nanowire array (TiO2NWA)photoanode; CB and VB are the semiconductor conduction and valence band.
Figure 1. Sensing scheme of hydrazine at a TiO2 nanowire array (TiO2NWA)photoanode; CB and VB are the semiconductor conduction and valence band.
Chemosensors 03 00146 g001
The application of nanostructured semiconductor materials with tailored dimensions and morphology, such as nanowires (NWs), may lead to great advantages in terms of sensitivity. Quasi 1D nanostructure can provide a direct path for the collection of photogenerated electrons reducing the recombination events and consequently increasing the yield of hydrazine oxidation [20]. Moreover, NW based electrodes own a larger surface area with respect to planar electrodes, increasing the area of the electrolyte/semiconductor interface and the overall photoelectrochemical reaction rate [21]. On this basis we used a recently developed sol-gel template method [22] for the synthesis of TiO2NWs which were used for the fabrication of a photoelectrochemical sensor. The sensor gave promising results in the photoelectrochemical determination of hydrazine in water.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

All the chemicals employed were of reagent grade quality and used without further purification. Polycarbonate track-etched membranes (pore diameter 200 nm, pore density 3 × 108 pores/cm2, membrane thickness 10 µm) were purchased from Osmonic Inc. Fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) transparent electrodes (7 Ω/sq) were purchased from Solaronix.

2.2. Template Synthesis

15 mL of titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTiP) were mixed to 30 mL of ethanol. In a different becker, 5.26 mL of acetilacetone (AcAc) and 2.72 mL of distilled water were mixed to 30 mL of ethanol. Then the first solution was poured, drop by drop, on the second solution and stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The molar composition of the final bath is TTiP/H2O/AcAc/EtOH = 1/3/1/20. Track-etched polycarbonate membranes were used as templating material. A fraction of about 20 mL of the yellow colored sol was pumped through the membrane (placed in a filter-holder) using a syringe. The pumping procedure was repeated 8–10 times. In the mean time the residual sol was taken to boiling temperature. After the pumping process, the membrane was immersed in the boiling sol for 20 min. Subsequently, the membrane was removed from the bath and dried overnight at room temperature before heating in an oven for three hours at 100 °C at stationary regime.

2.3. Electrodes Fabrication

FTO transparent electrodes were cleaned by sonication for 30 min in isopropanol and 30 min in deionized water before use.
For the preparation of the array of TiO2 nanowires (TiO2NWA), a drop of TTiP was casted on the conductive side of a FTO slide (about 0.7 cm2) and a square shaped piece (about 0.25 cm2) of TiO2 filled polycarbonate membrane was placed over it. The FTO slide was placed in an oven at 200 °C for one hour in order to allow the membrane to adhere to the FTO substrate. Subsequently the electrode was immersed in CH2Cl2 for 30 min in order to dissolve the polycarbonate template, obtaining a free standing array of NWs attached to the FTO. Finally, the electrode was calcined at 450 °C in flow air (30 mL/min) for 3 h. Eventual flat residuals of titania on top of TiO2-NW can be removed by reactive plasma etching with CF4.
A strip of copper tape with conductive glue was used to create the electrical contact and a strip of Kapton® tape with a circular hole was used to define the final geometric area of the electrode, namely 0.07 cm2.

2.4. Sensor Characterizations

SEM-EDX analyses were performed with a HITACHI TM3000 and a JEOL JSM-5600LV equipped with a Vega LVM TESCAN energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer.

2.5. Photoelectrochemical Hydrazine Determination

The TiO2NWA electrode was used for the photoelectrochemical determination of hydrazine in water. All the photoelectrochemical analyses were performed using a CHi 660 b potentiostat, in a three electrodes quartz cell. An Ag/AgCl (KCl saturated electrode) was used as reference electrode and a platinum coil was used as counter electrode. UV light irradiation was performed using three 'TL' 20W/05 PHILIPS UV-lamps.
Amperometric I-t curves were recorded applying a constant potential of 0.400 V in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) solution pH 7.0. The current was measured for the first thirty seconds in the dark, then the lamps were turned on and the electrode was irradiated with UV light.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrode Fabrication

The procedure for the sol-gel template synthesis of TiO2NW has been already presented in a previous work [22] and therefore it will be discussed here only briefly.
Metal-alkoxides, which are common precursors in sol-gel synthesis, are very reactive, making the pores filling process rather critical. Indeed, if the sol-gel reaction is too fast, the pores of the membrane could be blocked by large gel particles generated in the bulk of the solution, preventing the formation of a continuous metal oxide network within the pores. On the other hand, an equimolar mixture of TTiP and AcAc is stable for several hours, this allowed us to use a syringe to push the suspension inside the pores of the membrane, which was previously placed inside a membrane holder. Subsequently, the sol filled membrane was allowed to dry over night at room temperature and in an oven for three hours at 100 °C. At this point, the membrane was dissolved in an organic solvent, namely CH2Cl2, without damaging the TiO2NW. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the TiO2NWA after the dissolution of the templating membrane. Free standing NWs of 200 nm in diameter and about 8 μm in length can be clearly seen. These dimensions are in good agreement with the pore diameter and with the thickness of the templating membrane which are 200 nm and 10 μm respectively.
Figure 2. SEM image of a TiO2NWA (a) top-view; (b) lateral view.
Figure 2. SEM image of a TiO2NWA (a) top-view; (b) lateral view.
Chemosensors 03 00146 g002
After removing the template, the array was immobilized on the surface of the FTO electrode and heated at 450 °C for three hours. The thermal treatment is important in order to remove the organic ligand still present in the TiO2 framework and to induce the crystallization of amorphous TiO2 to anatase [22], which is the most photoactive crystal habit [23]. Further information concerning the characterization of the TiO2NWA can be found in a recent publication [22].

3.2. Influence of Bias Potential on the Hydrazine Determination

The analytical response of the sensor was recorded as anodic photocurrent, calculated as the difference between the current recorded in the dark and under UV irradiation, when a constant positive bias is applied. The bias potential is an important parameter in the photoelectrochemical hydrazine oxidation process. In order to determine the best anodic potential, we recorded a linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) at low scan rate (5 mV·s−1) under chopped light, in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) solution, pH 7.0, 0.1 mM hydrazine, using a TiO2NWA as the working electrode. By this way a voltammogram was obtained in which both photocurrent and current in the dark are recorded on a large potential window, namely from −0.5 V to 0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl. For each step in Figure 3, the upper part of the signal is the photocurrent, the lower is the current recorded in the dark.
Figure 3. Linear sweep voltammetry recorded in 0.1 M phosphate buffer,·pH 7, 0.1 mM hydrazine under chopped UV light. WE: TiO2NWA; RE: Ag/AgCl (KCl saturated; CE: Platinum Coil, scanrate 5 mV·s−1.
Figure 3. Linear sweep voltammetry recorded in 0.1 M phosphate buffer,·pH 7, 0.1 mM hydrazine under chopped UV light. WE: TiO2NWA; RE: Ag/AgCl (KCl saturated; CE: Platinum Coil, scanrate 5 mV·s−1.
Chemosensors 03 00146 g003
The voltammogram shows that 0.4 V is the optimal bias, as the photocurrent reaches its highest value while practically no faradic process is active in the dark, such processes become relevant at potentials more positive than 0.5 V.

3.3. Photoelectrochemical Determination of Hydrazine

Amperometric i-t measurements were used to study the photoelectrochemical response of the TiO2NWA sensor to hydrazine concentration. A typical analysis is reported in Figure 4. The first 30 s of the scan are recorded in the dark; during this time an anodic current is detected, which is ascribed to the formation of the space charge region on the TiO2. After this time, upon irradiation with UV light, a strong increase in the anodic current is observed. The photocurrent pattern can be divided into two phases. At the beginning of the irradiation, a steep increase of the photocurrent is observed generating a peak shaped curve, subsequently the photocurrent decreases up to reaching a steady state. This behavior is typical for TiO2 photoelectrodes and it is described as a classical onset of recombination [24,25]. The polarization step in the dark is important in order to allow the proper build-up of the space charge region which is responsible for the separation of the photogenerated charges, allowing to increase the photocurrent and, consequently, the analytical signal. Anyway, since the current measured under irradiation includes the current related to the photoelectrochemical oxidation at the semiconductor electrode plus the double layer and space charge region charging current, the analytical signal (iph) was calculated as the difference between the mean current value recorded during the last 3 s in the dark and the mean value of the photocurrent recorded during the last 3 s of the analysis under UV irradiation.
Figure 4. Amperometric i-t curve recorded at the TiO2NWA applying a potential step at + 0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 10 μM hydrazine. UV irradiation is turned on after 30 s from the beginning of the analysis.
Figure 4. Amperometric i-t curve recorded at the TiO2NWA applying a potential step at + 0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 10 μM hydrazine. UV irradiation is turned on after 30 s from the beginning of the analysis.
Chemosensors 03 00146 g004
This protocol has been used for the determination of different concentrations of hydrazine in the range of 0–1000 μM. Three repeated measurements were performed for each hydrazine concentration. The mean photocurrent values have been plotted against the logarithm of the hydrazine concentration. The calibration plot is linear over a wide range (up to 1 × 10−3 M) and can be expressed by the equation iph[A] = 3.0 × 10−7∙logC∙[log μM] + 2.06 × 10−7, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9919 (Figure 5). The limit of detection (LOD) is 1.91 μM, calculated as LOD = 3σb/m, where σb is the blank standard deviation and m is the sensitivity (slope of the calibration plot). The quantification limit (LOQ), calculated as LOQ = 10σb/m, is 8.91 μM.
Figure 5. Plot of photocurrent as a function of logarithm of hydrazine concentration.
Figure 5. Plot of photocurrent as a function of logarithm of hydrazine concentration.
Chemosensors 03 00146 g005
These results confirm that the photoelectrochemical determination of hydrazine can be a readily performed with templated TiO2 nanowires. Table 1 compares the analytical parameters obtained here with those previously achieved with other methods.
Table 1. Comparison of some of the analytical parameters of the different methods for hydrazine determination.
Table 1. Comparison of some of the analytical parameters of the different methods for hydrazine determination.
MethodElectrodeLOD (μM)Reference
Chromatography//0.03[5]
Spectrophotometry//30* (45)[2]
Chemiluminescence//0.5* (0.75)[4]
ElectrocatalysisNPHMGCa8[5]
ElectrocatalysisPCVMGCb4.2[6]
ElectrocatalysisNHCFMGCc90.6[7]
ElectrocatalysisMNPMBDDd1–3.27[2628]
PhotoelectrochemistryTi/TiO2e8.54[13]
PhotoelectrochemistryTiO2NWA1.91present work
a Nickel hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles modified carbon ceramic electrode; b Pyrocatechol violet modified glassy carbon electrode; c Nickel hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles modified graphite electrode; d Metal nanoparticles modified boron doped diamond electrodes; e Anodized titania. * LOD calculated as 2σ, in parenthesis as 3σ.
It can be seen that, among electrochemical methods, only those which employed metal nanoparticles modified boron doped diamond electrodes (MNPMBDD) [26,27,28] gave LODs comparable with the one achieved with the present TiO2NWA; it is worth to note that the modification of BDD with noble metals nanoparticles is however complex and require expensive materials. TiO2NWA allowed us to get improved LOD also with respect to the other photoelectrochemical method based on flat TiO2 photoanodes. This demonstrates that the use of nanostructured materials improves the analytical performances of the photoelectrochemical sensor. Chromatographic methods achieved lower LOD, but these analytical procedures require complex pretreatments of the samples, including a hydrazine derivatization reaction, which makes these methods less practical, more expensive and time consuming. Flow injection with chemiluminescence detection also furnished a very low LOD [4], however with a linearity limit which extends only to 5 × 10−5 M vs. 1 × 10−3 M for our method.

4. Conclusions

Based on the data presented here, it can be concluded that photoelectrochemistry is a promising method for the determination of hydrazine. TiO2NWA based sensors showed satisfactory linearity range and detection limit when compared to other methods reported in literature. We also demonstrated that the performances of photoelectrochemistry based methods can be improved by tailoring the morphology of the photoanode, indeed, by using structures based on TiO2 nanowires, the electron-hole recombination process can be decreased resulting in an increase of the analytical signal. Further improvements could be achieved by functionalizing the semiconductor with electrocatalytic nanoparticles, in order to improve the reaction rate and the charge separation efficiency. Since this sensor, in principle, can work with other oxidizable organic species, further studies will aim to extend the applicability of this method to other relevant organic environmental pollutants.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank MIUR (Rome) (project: PRIN 2010AXENJ8) for partial financial support.

Author Contributions

M.O. and P.U. conceived and designed the experiments; M.O. performed the experiments; M.O and P.U. analyzed the data; M.S. and V.T. contributed reagents and materials; A.S. performed analysis; M.O and P.U. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Hydrazine Hazard Summary-Created in April 1992; Revised in January 2000. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/hydrazin.html (accessed on 6 May 2015).
  2. Safavi, A.; Ensafi, A.A. Kinetic spectrophotometric determination of hydrazine. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 300, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rajasekharan, V.; Ramachandran, C.G. The titration of isoniazid and other hydrazine derivatives with chloramine-t. Anal. Chim. Acta 1971, 57, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Safavi, A.; Baezzat, M.R. Flow injection chemiluminescence determination of hydrazine. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 358, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Evgen’ev, M.I.; Evgen’eva, I.I.; Ismailova, R.N. Extraction-chromatographic determination of hydrazine in natural water as a 5,7-dinitrobenzofurazan derivative using diode-array detection. J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 55, 933–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abbaspour, A.; Khajehzadeh, A.; Ghaffarinejad, A. Electrocatalytic oxidation and determination of hydrazine on nickel hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles-modified carbon ceramic electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 631, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Golabi, S.M.; Zare, H.R.; Hamzehloo, M. Electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrazine at a pyrocatechol violet (PCV) hemically modified electrode. Microchem. J. 2001, 69, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shankaran, D.R.; Narayanan, S.S. Amperometric sensor for hydrazine determination based on mechanically immobilized nickel hexacyanoferrate modified electrode. Russ. J. Electrochem. 2001, 37, 1149–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, S.; Liu, B.; Nakata, K.; Ochiai, T.; Murakami, T.; Fujishima, A. Electrospinning preparation and photocatalytic activity of porous TiO2 nanofibers. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reddy, K.R.; Nakata, K.; Ochiai, T.; Murakami, T.; Tryk, D.A.; Fujishima, A. Facile fabrication and photocatalytic application of Ag nanoparticles-TiO2 nanofiber composites. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 11, 3692–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Haddour, N.; Chauvin, J.; Gondran, C.; Cosnier, S. Photoelectrochemical immunosensor for label-free detection and quantification of anti-cholera toxin antibody. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9693–9698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. An, Y.; Tang, L.; Jiang, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, M.; Jin, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W. A photoelectrochemical immunosensor based on Au-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for the detection of α-synuclein. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 14439–14446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tu, W.; Lei, J.; Wang, P.; Ju, H. Photoelectrochemistry of free-base-porphyrin-functionalized zinc oxide nanoparticles and their applications in biosensing. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 9440–9447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. An, X.; Teng, F.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, C.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, E. Enhanced photoelectrochemical sensor based on ZnO–SnO2 composite nanotubes. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 614, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ojani, R.; Zarei, E. A new simple electrochemically assisted photocatalysis sensor of hydrazine using Ti/TiO2 electrode. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2013, 24, 657–662. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu, Y.; Xue, Z.; He, H.; Ai, R.; Liu, X.; Lu, X. Photoelectrochemical sensing for hydroquinone based on porphyrin-functionalized Au nanoparticles on grapheme. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 47, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rajeshwar, K. Photoelectrochemistry and the environment. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1995, 25, 1067–1082. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, S. Photoelectrochemically active species and photoelectrochemical biosensors. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 2846–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Voccia, D.; Palchetti, I. Photoelectrochemical biosensors for nucleic acid detection. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 3320–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Law, M.; Greene, L.E.; Johnson, J.C.; Saykally, R.; Yang, P. Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ongaro, M.; Gambirasi, A.; Favaro, M.; Ugo, P. Electrochemical synthesis and characterization of hierarchically branched ZnO nanostructures on ensembles of gold nanowires. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 78, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ongaro, M.; Mardegan, A.; Stortini, A.M.; Signoretto, M.; Ugo, P. Arrays of templated TiO2 nanofibres as improved photoanodes for water splitting under visible light. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 165402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Signoretto, M.; Ghedini, E.; Pinna, F.; Nichele, V.; Crocella, V.; Cerrato, G. Effect of textural properties on the drug delivery behaviour of nanoporous TiO2 matrices. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 139, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghicov, A.; Schmidt, B.; Kunze, J.; Schmuki, P. Photoresponse in the visible range from Cr-doped TiO2 nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 433, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Spadavecchia, F.; Ardizzone, S.; Cappelletti, G.; Falciola, L.; Ceotto, M.; Lotti, D. Investigation and optimization of photocurrent transient measurements on nano-TiO2. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2013, 43, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Channon, R.B.; Newland, J.C.; Bristow, A.W.T.; Ray, A.D.; Macpherson, J.V. Selective detection of hydrazine in the presence of excess electrochemically active pharmaceutical ingredients using boron doped diamond metal nanoparticle functionalised electrodes. Electroanalysis 2013, 25, 2613–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, H.; Dong, L.; Yu, H.; Huo, M. Direct electrochemical oxidation and detection of hydrazine on a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode. Russ. J. Electrochem. 2013, 49, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Batchelor-McAuley, C.; Banks, C.E.; Simm, A.O.; Jones, T.G.J.; Compton, R.G. The electroanalytical detection of hydrazine: A comparison of the use of palladium nanoparticles supported on boron-doped diamond and palladium plated BDD microdisc array. Analyst 2006, 131, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ongaro, M.; Signoretto, M.; Trevisan, V.; Stortini, A.M.; Ugo, P. Arrays of TiO2 Nanowires as Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Hydrazine Detection. Chemosensors 2015, 3, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors3020146

AMA Style

Ongaro M, Signoretto M, Trevisan V, Stortini AM, Ugo P. Arrays of TiO2 Nanowires as Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Hydrazine Detection. Chemosensors. 2015; 3(2):146-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors3020146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ongaro, Michael, Michela Signoretto, Valentina Trevisan, Angela Maria Stortini, and Paolo Ugo. 2015. "Arrays of TiO2 Nanowires as Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Hydrazine Detection" Chemosensors 3, no. 2: 146-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors3020146

APA Style

Ongaro, M., Signoretto, M., Trevisan, V., Stortini, A. M., & Ugo, P. (2015). Arrays of TiO2 Nanowires as Photoelectrochemical Sensors for Hydrazine Detection. Chemosensors, 3(2), 146-156. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors3020146

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop