Comparative Characterisation of Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Flavour Profile in Wuhua Yellow Chickens (Gallus domesticus) Assessed by Multi-Analytical Approaches
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Feeding
2.3. Slaughter and Sample Collection
2.4. Meat Quality
2.5. Proximate Composition and Flavour Analyses
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Slaughter Performance
3.2. Physicochemical Meat Quality
3.3. Proximate Muscle Composition
3.4. Amino Acid Composition
3.5. Fatty Acid Composition
3.6. Volatile Flavour Compounds
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources. Animal Genetic Resources in China: Poultry; Agricultural Press of China: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, G.; Wang, K.; Wang, J.; Ding, C. Poultry Genetic Resources of China; Shanghai Publisher of Science and Technology: Shanghai, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Weng, Z.; Xu, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Zhong, M.; Zhong, F.; Du, B.; Zhang, B.; Huang, X. Genomic Variations and Signatures of Selection in Wuhua Yellow Chicken. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, W.Q.; Cui, Z.W.; Hu, W.Q.; Wang, M.X.; Chen, X.H.; Hu, X.J.; Chisoro, P.; Han, D.; Zhou, J.C.; Zhang, C.H. Characterization and comparison of flavor compounds in different specialty chicken meat after stewing. Food Chem. X 2025, 28, 102589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marupanthorn, K.; Wattanakul, W.; Chaiwang, N. Physiological profiling and breed suitability modeling of slow-growing Thai native chickens: Comparative insights with fast-growing broilers for sustainable poultry production. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2025, 24, 2376–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, S.W.; Song, D.H.; Kim, H.W. Stepwise Sous-Vide Cooking as a Novel Approach to Enhance the Water-Holding Capacity and Tenderness of Chicken Breast. Foods 2025, 14, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Hu, B.; Zhang, Q. Advances in nutrition and function properties of chicken meat protein. J. Zhongkai Univ. Agric. Eng. 2009, 22, 66–71. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, S.; Liao, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Malhi, I.; Wang, Y.; Peng, S.; Zhang, L. Lipidomics in chicken meat flavor chemistry: Current understanding, integrated omics approaches, and future perspectives. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, Z. Whole-Genome Resequencing Uncovers the Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures of 10 Indigenous Yellow-Feathered Chicken Populations Including Wuhua Yellow Chicken. Doctoral Thesis, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.; Weng, Z.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Zhong, M.; Kuang, W.; Tang, Y.; Zhong, F. Research Progress in Wuhua Yellow Chicken. J. Jiaying Univ. 2017, 35, 50–57. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.; Cao, X.; Ming, S.; Xu, Y.; Weng, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X. Effects of Different Processing Methods on the Quality and Flavor Characteristics of Shiqi Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) Meat. Molecules 2026, 31, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.Y.; He, Z.; Liu, Y.G.; Jia, G.; Zhao, H. Effect of supplementing hydroxy selenomethionine on meat quality of yellow feather broiler. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, T.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Gao, F. Research Advance of Factors Affecting Chicken Meat Flavor and Its Nuitritional Regulation. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 33, 3028–3035. [Google Scholar]
- Mu, X. Study on the Regulation Mechanism of Castrationto Improve the Meat Quality of Rooster Flavor. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- NY/T 823-2004; Performance Terms and Measurement for Poultry. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2004.
- Harr, K.M.; Jewell, N.; Edwards, J.; More, S.; Mafi, G.G.; Pfeiffer, M.; Ramanathan, R. Comparing the effects of packaging normal-pH and atypical dark-cutting beef in modified atmosphere conditions on surface color. Meat Sci. 2024, 213, 109466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, J. Comparative characterization of lipids and volatile compounds of Beijing Heiliu and Laiwu Chinese black pork as markers. Food Res. Int. 2021, 146, 110433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Zhou, K.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.; Xu, B. Applying low voltage electrostatic field in the freezing process of beef steak reduced the loss of juiciness and textural properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2021, 68, 102600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zang, S.; Wang, P.; Li, N. Meat Quality in Taihang Chickens. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 23, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Q.; Cui, H.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Yue, S.; Tang, C.; Zhao, Q.; Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Qin, Y.; et al. Comparative characterization of Taihe silky chicken and Cobb chicken using LC/MS-based lipidomics and GC/MS-based volatilomics. LWT 2022, 163, 113554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB 5009.5-2010; National Food Safety Standard Determination of Protein in Foods. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2010.
- GB/T 9695.7-2008; Meat and Meat Products—Determination of Total Fat Content. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
- GB/T 5009.124-2003; Determination of Amino Acids in Foods. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2003.
- GB/T 9695.2-2008; Meat and Meat Products—Determination of Fatty Acids. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
- Han, D.; Zhang, C.; Fauconnier, M.; Mi, S. Characterization and differentiation of boiled pork from Tibetan, Sanmenxia and Duroc × (Landrac × Yorkshire) pigs by volatiles profiling and chemometrics analysis. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mu, X.; Cui, X.; Liu, R.; Li, Q.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, G.; Ge, C.; Wen, J.; Hu, Y.; Cui, H. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes and Pathways for Abdominal Fat Deposition in Ovariectomized and Sham-Operated Chickens. Genes 2019, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Geng, A.; Zeng, L.; Yan, Z.; Cao, J.; Gu, H.; Chu, Q.; Liu, H.; et al. Differences in Slaughter Performance, Meat Quality, and Flavor of Beijing-You Chickens Reaching the Same Market Weight at Different Ages. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2026, 53, 1261–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, F.; Li, W.; Lin, W.; Huang, X.; Huang, X.; Zhou, C. Growth and development characteristics and carcass traits of Wuhua three-yellow chicken. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. 2014, 40, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, H.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Sun, Z.; Lv, D.; Zhu, W.; Cheng, Y. Dietary phytosterols supplementation improves the growth performance and decreases the abdominal fat of broiler chickens by regulating intestinal epithelial structure and microbiota. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2023, 305, 115786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.X.; Chaudhr, M.T.; Yao, J.Y.; Wang, S.N.; Zhou, B.; Wang, M.; Han, C.Y.; You, Y.; Li, Y. Effects of phyto-oestrogen quercetin on productive performance, hormones, reproductive organs and apoptotic genes in laying hens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 102, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Wang, P.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, T.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.; Cao, C.; Cai, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J. Free-caged rearing modes regulate intestinal metabolism by influencing gut microbial homeostasis. Poulture Sci. 2025, 104, 104381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Xu, K.; Wang, L.; Zhu, L.; Long, C.; Lin, Z.; Dou, J.; Wang, X.; Qi, X.; Chen, L.; et al. Comparative morphological and lipidomic profiling of abdominal adipose tissue in Beijing You chickens at different ages and Ross 308 broilers. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauclercq, S.; Nadal-Desbarats, L.; Hennequet-Antier, C.; Collin, A.; Tesseraud, S.; Bourin, M.; Le Bihan-Duval, E.; Berri, C. Serum and Muscle Metabolomics for the Prediction of Ultimate pH, a Key Factor for Chicken-Meat Quality. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 1168–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, S.; Jiang, Z.; Zheng, C.; Chen, F.; Ruan, D. Effects of Dietary Protein to Energy Ratio on Growth Performance and Meat Quality in Fast-growing Lingnan Yellow-feathered Chickens and Qingyuan Partridge Chickens. In Proceedings of the 4th (2014) China Yellow-Feathered Broiler Industry Development Conference, Ningbo, China, 26–28 September 2014; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
- Toomer, O.; Livingston, M.; Wall, B.; Sanders, E.; Vu, T.; Malheiros, R.; Livingston, K.; Carvalho, L.; Ferket, P. Meat quality and sensory attributes of meat produced from broiler chickens fed a high oleic peanut diet. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5188–5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stéphane, B.; Christelle, H.; Christophe, P.; Estelle, G.; Anne, C.; Sophie, T.; Sonia, M.; Marie, B.; Marco, M.; Frédéric, M.; et al. Muscle transcriptome analysis reveals molecular pathways and biomarkers involved in extreme ultimate pH and meat defect occurrence in chicken. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowker, B.; Zhuang, H. Relationship between water-holding capacity and protein denaturation in broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kokoszyński, D.; Żochowska-Kujawska, J.; Kotowicz, M.; Piątek, H.; Włodarczyk, K.; Arpášová, H.; Biesiada-Drzazga, B.; Wegner, M.; Saleh, M.; Imański, M. The Effects of Slaughter Age and Sex on Carcass Traits, Meat Quality, and Leg Bone Characteristics of Farmed Common Pheasants (Phasianus colchicus L). Animals 2024, 14, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Gu, Y.; Cai, Z.; Feng, X.; Yang, C.; Xin, G. Research progress on inosine monophosphate deposition mechanism in chicken muscle. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 62, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Mahfuz, S.; Long, S.; Wu, D.; Gao, J.; Piao, X. Supplementation of Mixed Organic Acids Improves Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Gut Morphology and Volatile Fatty Acids of Broiler Chicken. Animals 2021, 11, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Li, J.; Liang, R.; Liu, Y.; Song, Z.; Buyse, J.; Zhu, L.; Zuo, H. Effect of dietary Bacillus subtilis on basic chemical composition, free amino acids, fatty acids and volatile organic compounds in broiler meat. Poult. Sci. 2026, 105, 106673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, J.D.; Enser, M.; Fisher, A.V.; Nute, G.R.; Richardson, R.I. Effects of Diets on Fatty Acids and Meat Quality. In Options Méditerranéennes Série a Séminaires Méditerranéens; CIHEAM: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Chiam, H.; Julius, H.; Bürgler, B.M.; Claudia, R.; Harald, P.; Margit, W. From linoleic acid to hexanal and hexanol by whole cell catalysis with a lipoxygenase, hydroperoxide lyase and reductase cascade in Komagataella phaffii. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 10, 3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Méndez, M.V.R.; Velasco, J.; Lastrucci, A.S.; Ruiz, G.M. Lipid Quality Changes in French Fries, Chicken Croquettes, and Chicken Nuggets Fried with High-Linoleic and High-Oleic Sunflower Oils in Domestic Deep Fryers. Foods 2024, 13, 2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Chen, X. Comparison of volatile compounds in different kinds of cooked chicken meat. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 31, 208–215. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X.; Yu, Y.; Saleh, A.S.M.; Yang, X.; Ma, J.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, W.; Wang, Z. Characterization of aroma profiles of Chinese four most famous traditional red-cooked chickens using GC-MS, GC-IMS, and E-nose. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purslow, P.P. New Aspects of Meat Quality: From Genes to Ethics; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, W.; Cai, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H. Comparative analysis of characteristic volatile compounds in Chinese traditional smoked chicken (specialty poultry products) from different regions by headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 7192–7201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maggiolino, A.; Faccia, M.; Holman, B.; Hopkins, D.L.; Bragaglio, A.; Natrella, G.; Mazzone, A.; Palo, P.D. The effect of oral or respiratory exposure to limonene on goat kid performance and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2022, 191, 108865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Item | 0–7 Week | 8–16 Week | 17–20 Week |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (g/100 g) | |||
| Corn | 62 | 61.5 | 67 |
| Soybean meal | 31 | 24.5 | 22.7 |
| Wheat bran | - | 10 | 3.8 |
| Fish meal | 3 | - | 1 |
| Oil | - | - | 1.5 |
| Premix | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Calculated nutrient levels | |||
| ME (kcal/kg) | 2956 | 2807 | 3028 |
| CP (%) | 19.44 | 16.38 | 15.71 |
| Ca (%) | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| Available P (%) | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.40 |
| Sex | Live wt (g) | Dressing % | Half-Eviscerated % | Eviscerated % | Breast Muscle % | Leg Muscle % | Abdominal Fat % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cocks | 1793 ± 159 | 89.77 ± 1.68 | 81.67 ± 3.06 A | 70.10 ± 4.22 A | 13.61 ± 1.39 B | 24.58 ± 2.79 A | 0.46 ± 0.49 B |
| Hens | 1452 ± 124 | 92.32 ± 1.17 | 78.01 ± 2.81 B | 63.92 ± 2.41 B | 15.96 ± 1.83 A | 20.25 ± 1.76 B | 6.47 ± 1.89 A |
| Amino Acid | Cocks (g/100 g) | Hens (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|
| Asp | 2.09 ± 0.17 | 2.11 ± 0.13 |
| Thr * | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.02 |
| Ser | 0.86 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.02 |
| Glu | 3.48 ± 0.22 | 3.43 ± 0.02 |
| Gly | 0.95 ± 0.07 | 0.94 ± 0.08 |
| Ala | 1.30 ± 0.17 | 1.31 ± 0.18 |
| Val * | 1.07 ± 0.18 | 1.09 ± 0.19 |
| Met * | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 0.60 ± 0.05 |
| Ile * | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.03 |
| Leu * | 1.78 ± 0.37 | 1.79 ± 0.47 |
| Tyr | 0.74 ± 0.13 | 0.75 ± 0.12 |
| Phe * | 0.86 ± 0.15 | 0.86 ± 0.14 |
| His | 1.14 ± 0.17 | 1.19 ± 0.18 |
| Lys * | 1.95 ± 0.24 | 1.95 ± 0.13 |
| Arg | 1.45 ± 0.08 | 1.44 ± 0.09 |
| Pro | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.02 |
| EAA | 7.67 | 7.70 |
| NEAA | 13.43 | 13.40 |
| DAA | 5.57 | 5.54 |
| TAA | 21.10 | 21.10 |
| IMP (mg/100 g) | 105 ± 8.36 a | 98 ± 9.48 b |
| Fatty Acid | Cocks (%) | Hens (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Capric acid (C10:0) | 0.22 ± 0.01 | - |
| Undecylic acid (C11:0) | 0.29 ± 0.02 A | 0.06 ± 0.01 B |
| Lauric acid (C12:0) | 0.13 ± 0.01 | - |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.02 |
| Myristoleic acid (C14:1) | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| Pentadecylic acid (C15:0) | 0.08 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.00 |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 25.40 ± 1.08 | 25.40 ± 1.27 |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) | 4.50 ± 0.88 | 5.60 ± 0.74 |
| Margaric acid (C17:0) | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
| (10Z)-Heptadec-10-enoic acid (C17:1) | - | 0.07 ± 0.00 |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 9.50 ± 1.03 | 7.00 ± 1.01 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1) | 35.40 ± 2.13 b | 42.60 ± 2.37 a |
| Linoleic acid (C18:2) | 18.10 ± 1.24 | 15.20 ± 1.21 |
| α-Linolenic acid (C18:3) | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.04 |
| Eicosenoic acid (C20:1) | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.02 |
| Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2) | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (C20:3) | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
| ARA (C20:4) | 2.40 ± 0.32 | 1.20 ± 0.33 |
| Docosatetraenoic acid (C22:4) | 0.60 ± 0.01 A | 0.26 ± 0.01 B |
| DPA (C22:5) | 0.38 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.05 |
| DHA (C22:6) | 0.24 ± 0.09 | 0.18 ± 0.07 |
| Total SFA | 36.67 ± 2.35 | 33.36 ± 2.47 |
| Total MUFA | 40.61 ± 3.16 b | 48.76 ± 3.27 a |
| Total PUFA | 22.72 ± 1.35 a | 17.88 ± 1.12 b |
| Total USFA | 63.33 ± 4.12 | 66.64 ± 4.67 |
| Items | Molecular Formula | CAS Number | Retention Indices (NIST/Exp) | Relative Content (%) | Identification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cock | Hen | |||||
| Aldehydes | ||||||
| Pentanal | C5H10O | 000110-62-3 | 980/979 | 13.70 | 15.30 | MS, RI |
| Hexanal | C6H12O | 000066-25-1 | 1089/1084 | 54.70 | 50.90 | MS, RI |
| Octanal | C8H16O | 000124-13-0 | 1276/1291 | - | 2.71 | MS, RI |
| Nonanal | C9H18O | 000124-19-6 | 1384/1396 | 1.47 | 2.26 | MS, RI |
| Benzaldehyde | C7H6O | 000100-52-7 | 1454/1450 | 2.85 | 0.55 | MS, RI |
| Total | 72.72 | 71.17 | MS, RI | |||
| Alcohols | ||||||
| 1-pentanol | C5H12O | 000071-41-0 | 1231/1249 | 7.83 | - | MS, RI |
| Hexanol | C6H14O | 000111-27-3 | 1334/1333 | 1.49 | 1.52 | MS, RI |
| 1-octen-3-ol | C8H16O | 003391-86-4 | 1429/1428 | 6.52 | 7.23 | MS, RI |
| Heptanol | C7H16O | 000111-70-6 | 1464/1455 | - | 1.22 | MS, RI |
| 1-octanol | C8H18O | 000111-87-5 | 1541/1540 | - | 0.83 | MS, RI |
| Total | 15.84 | 10.80 | ||||
| Terpenes | ||||||
| 3-ethyl-2-methyl-1,3-hexadiene | C9H16 | 061142-36-7 | 1058/1060 | - | 0.29 | MS, RI |
| (-)-Limonene | C10H16 | 005989-54-8 | 1187/1190 | 7.27 | 7.23 | MS, RI |
| Total | 7.27 | 7.52 | ||||
| Ketone | ||||||
| 2,3-octanedione | C8H14O2 | 000585-25-1 | 1284/1280 | - | 1.09 | MS, RI |
| Ester | ||||||
| Amyl formate | C6H12O2 | 000638-49-3 | 1076/1080 | |||
| Acid | ||||||
| Octanoic acid | C8H16O2 | 000124-07-2 | 2012/2012 | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Weng, Z.; Xu, Y.; Li, W.; Huang, X.; Luo, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X. Comparative Characterisation of Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Flavour Profile in Wuhua Yellow Chickens (Gallus domesticus) Assessed by Multi-Analytical Approaches. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14050109
Weng Z, Xu Y, Li W, Huang X, Luo L, Liu Z, Zhang X. Comparative Characterisation of Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Flavour Profile in Wuhua Yellow Chickens (Gallus domesticus) Assessed by Multi-Analytical Approaches. Chemosensors. 2026; 14(5):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14050109
Chicago/Turabian StyleWeng, Zhuoxian, Yongjie Xu, Weina Li, Xunhe Huang, Liangjie Luo, Zhiwei Liu, and Xiaonan Zhang. 2026. "Comparative Characterisation of Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Flavour Profile in Wuhua Yellow Chickens (Gallus domesticus) Assessed by Multi-Analytical Approaches" Chemosensors 14, no. 5: 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14050109
APA StyleWeng, Z., Xu, Y., Li, W., Huang, X., Luo, L., Liu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2026). Comparative Characterisation of Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Flavour Profile in Wuhua Yellow Chickens (Gallus domesticus) Assessed by Multi-Analytical Approaches. Chemosensors, 14(5), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14050109

