Next Article in Journal
Sensors and Mass Spectrometry Connection for Food Analysis: A Systematic Review of Methodological Synergies
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Quantitative Detection of ALP Activity via Electrochemiluminescence Signal Switching on a Biomimetic Zirconia Interface
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Prostate Cancer Diagnostics in Transition: A Review of Promising Biomarkers, Multiplex Biosensors, and Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies

1
Biomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
2
Materials and Engineering Research Institute, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
3
School of Engineering and Environment Built, Sheffield Hallam University, City Campus, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK
4
North Africa International Centre for Research on Serums, Vaccines and Genetic Diseases, The Authority for Scientific Research, Zawia P.O. Box 80045, Libya
5
Department of Chemical, Material and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Mappin St., Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield S1 4LZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2026, 14(4), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040099
Submission received: 15 March 2026 / Revised: 9 April 2026 / Accepted: 17 April 2026 / Published: 19 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Biosensors for Global Health Challenges)

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most prevalent urological malignancies worldwide, with early and accurate diagnosis being critical for improving patient outcomes. Traditional screening approaches, such as digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, have long served as frontline tools; however, their limited specificity and sensitivity contribute to high rates of false positives, unnecessary biopsies, and overtreatment. Recent UK guidelines and international consensus increasingly question the role of PSA-based population screening, advocating for risk-stratified pathways and multiparametric MRI as first-line investigations. In parallel, advances in molecular biology have identified promising cancer-specific biomarkers, such as prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2:ERG), that outperform PSAs in terms of specificity and prognostic value. These developments have catalysed innovation in biosensor technologies, enabling rapid, cost-effective, and non-invasive detection of single and multiplex biomarkers in urine and serum. Electrochemical and optical affinity-based biosensors offer transformative potential for the development of personalised point-of-care platforms and diagnostics, reducing the reliance on invasive procedures and improving clinical decision-making. The latter can be augmented with artificial intelligence (AI) tools. This review critically examines the limitations of PSAs, synthesises evidence on novel biomarkers and imaging-led strategies, and evaluates the design, performance, and translational challenges of biosensor-based assays. Furthermore, it outlines future directions, including standardisation, large-scale clinical validation, and integration of multiplex biosensors with AI for precision diagnostics. By bridging molecular insights with engineering innovations, these approaches promise to redefine PCa screening and enable accurate, patient-centred care.
Keywords: prostate cancer; risk-stratified screening; PSA; PCA3; TMPRSS2:ERG; multiparametric MRI; biosensors; point-of-care diagnostics prostate cancer; risk-stratified screening; PSA; PCA3; TMPRSS2:ERG; multiparametric MRI; biosensors; point-of-care diagnostics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takita, S.; Nabok, A.; Mussa, M.H.; Shtawa, A.; Lishchuk, A.; Smith, D.P. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics in Transition: A Review of Promising Biomarkers, Multiplex Biosensors, and Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies. Chemosensors 2026, 14, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040099

AMA Style

Takita S, Nabok A, Mussa MH, Shtawa A, Lishchuk A, Smith DP. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics in Transition: A Review of Promising Biomarkers, Multiplex Biosensors, and Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies. Chemosensors. 2026; 14(4):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takita, Sarra, Alexei Nabok, Magdi H. Mussa, Abdalrahem Shtawa, Anna Lishchuk, and David P. Smith. 2026. "Prostate Cancer Diagnostics in Transition: A Review of Promising Biomarkers, Multiplex Biosensors, and Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies" Chemosensors 14, no. 4: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040099

APA Style

Takita, S., Nabok, A., Mussa, M. H., Shtawa, A., Lishchuk, A., & Smith, D. P. (2026). Prostate Cancer Diagnostics in Transition: A Review of Promising Biomarkers, Multiplex Biosensors, and Point-of-Care Diagnostic Strategies. Chemosensors, 14(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors14040099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop