Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Electrochemiluminescence-Based Single-Cell Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Chemiluminescent ELISA for Detection of Diisobutyl Phthalate in Water, Lettuce and Aquatic Organisms
Previous Article in Journal
Fluorescence Evolution of Gold Nanoclusters in the Presence of Shapely Silver Nanoparticles and UV-Vis Light
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quenching of the Photoluminescence of Gold Nanoclusters Synthesized by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Water upon Interaction with Toxic Metal Species in Aqueous Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fluorescent Probes for Biomacromolecules Based on Monomethine Cyanine Dyes

by
Pavel G. Pronkin
and
Alexander S. Tatikolov
*
N.M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2023, 11(5), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11050280
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 5 May 2023 / Published: 7 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Luminescent Materials for Sensing)

Abstract

:
Monomethine cyanine dyes (MCDs) are widely applied as biomolecular probes and stains in biochemical and biomedical research. This is based on the ability of MCDs to associate with biomolecules (mostly nucleic acids) with significant fluorescent growth. The present review considers the works devoted to the properties of MCDs and the influence of noncovalent interactions with biomacromolecules on their properties, as well as their use as noncovalent probes and stains for various biomacromolecules. The synthesis and photonics (photophysics and photochemistry; in particular, the generation of the triplet state) of MCDs are also considered. Areas and prospects of the practical applications of MCDs in biochemistry and biomedicine are discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Spectral-fluorescent detection and quantification of biomacromolecules is used in various biochemical and biomedical studies. It is widely applied in modern techniques such as real-time PCR, gel electrophoresis, flow cytometry, blotting, etc. This method is based on the ability of some fluorescent dyes (probes) to associate with target biomolecules with significant changes in spectral-fluorescent characteristics. Polymethine (cyanine) dyes can serve as such probes due to their unique properties, including, first of all, their high extinction coefficients, moderate fluorescence, and the dependence of the spectral-fluorescent properties on the molecular environment. Additionally, notable is the ability of cyanines to form ordered aggregates: dimers and H- and J-aggregates [1]. An important prerequisite for the use of cyanine dyes as probes is that they can bind noncovalently to various biomacromolecules, which is usually accompanied by a fluorescent growth [2,3]. Cyanine dyes contain the cyanine chromophore, which is a polymethine chain with conjugated -C=C- bonds that typically connect N-containing end heterocycles and has an odd number of carbon atoms. The length of this chain largely influences the dye’s spectral range of emission and absorption. Cyanines typically have a chromophore moiety with a total positive charge [3]. Monomethine cyanine dyes (MCD) represent a class of cyanine dyes with the shortest polymethine chain, which consists of only one–CH= unit linking terminal heterocyclic groups. They can be both symmetrical and unsymmetrical (Figure 1). For simplicity, counterions in the structures of dyes are not shown.
Although the first MCD was synthesized by C.G. Williams back in 1856 [4], MCDs have been widely used only since the early 1990s due to their application as nucleic acid probes and labels. The MCD first used as such a probe (in reticulocyte analysis) was the unsymmetrical dye thiazole orange (TO; 1; Figure 1) [5].
At present, MCDs (mostly unsymmetrical, both monomers and covalent dimers) are very numerous, due to their wide use as nucleic acid probes and stains. Among the cyanines, they are the best nucleic acid labels with very high fluorescent growth.
This review considers the works devoted to the properties of MCDs and their use as noncovalent probes and stains for various biomacromolecules. The synthesis and photonics (photophysics and photochemistry) of MCDs and the influence of noncovalent interactions with biomacromolecules on their properties are also considered. Areas and prospects of the practical applications of MCDs are discussed.

2. Synthesis of MCDs

The methods of synthesis of MCDs of various structures (both symmetrical and unsymmetrical) were described in [6]. These include the nitrite method (using an ester or salt of nitrous acid); the alkyl- or aryl-thio method; condensations based on reactive =N–R; 4′-cyanine condensation involving the elimination of HX + H2; Y-cyanine condensation involving reactive I, Cl, CN, or SO3R; elimination of 2HX; and other methods. The syntheses of MCDs with substituents in the polymethine chain were also described.
Some noticeable examples of the syntheses are presented below.
The well-known thioalkyl method for the synthesis of MCDs with benzothiazole nuclei was used in [7]. This was a condensation reaction of a 2-thiomethylbenzothiazolium salt with another alkylated heterocycle having an activated methyl group (Figure 2).
This method was used in a recent work [8] for the synthesis of symmetrical MCDs with various terminal heterocyclic groups and substituents at nitrogen atoms. It is also widely used for the synthesis of unsymmetrical MCDs with different heterocyclic residues [9,10,11,12]. The thioalkyl method was applied in the synthesis of a number of MCDs derived from SYBR green II [13].
In [14], a new modification of this method was proposed for the synthesis of uncharged monomethine cyanine dyes. The authors suggest avoiding the use of two quaternary precursors, which reduces the number of steps. Monocationic and dicationic MCDs of the TO family were prepared by the thioalkyl method under solvent-free microwave irradiation by condensation of benzothiazolium salts with quaternary quinolone salts having a reactive methyl group in the presence of triethylamine [15].
The formation of toxic methyl mercaptan is a significant disadvantage of the method. Another disadvantage is that the alkyl groups at sulfur and nitrogen atoms in the starting compounds can change their positions, which leads to an appearance of byproducts of the reaction. This disadvantage is absent in the synthesis of MCDs via melting 2-iminobenzothiazoline with a quaternary heterocyclic salt containing a 2- or 4-methyl group [16]. This method has been successfully applied to the synthesis of both symmetrical and unsymmetrical MCDs (Figure 3):
Another procedure for the synthesis of MCDs, using a sulfobetaine salt of the N-alkyl heterocycle and a quaternary heterocyclic compound containing a reactive methylene group (Figure 4), was also proposed [17].
An alternative method (Figure 5) was applied to the synthesis of dicationic and tricationic MCDs (benzothiazole derivatives) via condensation in a basic medium of an N-alkyl-2-methylbenzothiazolium salt with a 2- or 4-chloroquinoline derivative [18]. In [19], the synthesis of monocationic MCDs was carried out via condensation of quaternized salts of 2-ethylbenzothiazole and 4-chloroquinolinium in the presence of N-ethyldiisopropylamine.
In particular, in the work [20], a number of tricationic analogues of TO were obtained (see Figure 5), having as substituents R1 and R2 (additional cationic groups) trimethylammonium, triethylammonium, 1-methylpyrrolidinium, 4-methylmorpholinium, pyridinium, N,N-dimethylpyridinium, and 3-(dimethylammonio)propan-1-ol. The works [19,21] describe the synthesis and properties of a number of monocationic, dicationic and tricationic MCDs of the TO family, the molecules of which contain carbamoylethyl, 2-hydroxypropyl, and 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl substituents.
The synthesis of unsymmetrical neutral pH-sensitive a MCD based on 3-phenyl-2H-1,4-benzothiazine via its condensation with indole-3-carboxaldehyde was described (Figure 6; dye yield, ~50%) [22]:
Grinding at room temperature with a small amount of a catalyst was used to synthesize a MCD in a solvent-free, effective, and environmentally friendly manner (Figure 7) [23]. The method’s benefits include the mild conditions, good conversion, and low procedure costs.
In [24] a new efficient procedure for the synthesis of MCDs (TO and its derivatives) was proposed by the method of traceless cleavage of the Merrifield resin. The cleavage of the Merrifield resin was carried out during the solid-phase synthesis of a dye. An important advantage of the synthesis is the elimination of the long-term purification step characteristic of the traditional liquid-phase method, which makes it possible to use the synthesized dyes directly for biological purposes.
For the synthesis of homodimeric MCDs having 4 positive charges, the following scheme is known (Figure 8) [25]:
In [26] the synthesis of new dimeric MCDs based on the TO chromophore under the action of microwave radiation was described. The synthesis is performed via the reaction of a monomethine dye having an iodoalkyl group with tertiary diamine linkers. In [27], the synthesis of homodimeric derivatives of dye 1 (TO) with various linkers was described (Figure 8).
Details of the methods of MCD synthesis are summarized in Table 1.

3. Photonics of MCD in Solution

The photonics (photophysical and photochemical properties) of MCDs were studied in a number of works. Depending of the nature of the terminal heterocycles in their molecules, the absorption spectral maxima of MCDs range from ~420 to >600 nm, with extinction coefficients of up to 105 M−1 cm−1. Fluorescence quantum yields of MCDs in nonviscous solvents are usually very low [10]; for example, for 1,1′-diethyl-2,2′-cyanine (2, Figure 9; pseudoisocyanine, PIC) in ethanol, the Φf was estimated to be ~0.1% [28]. This is explained by the ultrafast nonradiative deactivation of the excited state (S1) of MCDs.
The dynamics of the S1 state of some symmetrical MCDs (in particular, MCD 2 (PIC), 3 (1,1′-diethyl-4,4′-cyanine), and 4 (1,1′-diethyl-2,2′-pyridocyanine); see Figure 9) were studied by picosecond and femtosecond spectroscopy [29,30,31,32,33,34]. The ultrafast deactivation of the S1 state of a MCD is explained by the barrierless character of its potential surface. The deactivation leads to rapid internal conversion (S1 ~→ S0) and trans-cis isomerization via rotation around the methine bridge (Figure 10).
The excited-state dynamics of commonly used unsymmetrical dyes, derivatives of oxazole yellow (YO) (5–8; Figure 11), were studied in water using ultrafast fluorescence spectroscopy. Both the monomer and H-dimer of the dyes exhibit very weak emission; the monomer exhibits this property due to extremely fast nonradiative deactivation with a time constant of about 3–4 ps, while the H-dimer has weak emission due to excitonic coupling [35].
The ultrafast excited-state dynamics in an aqueous solution were also studied for another widely used unsymmetrical dye, MCD 1 (TO, see Figure 1) [36]. The fluorescence lifetime of 1 was found to be extremely short (~1 ps). This explains the very low fluorescence quantum yield of 1 in water (~0.02%) [37].
It has been shown that the spatial configurations of both trans- and cis-isomers of 4 are nonplanar [33]. Trans- and cis-isomers of 2 were shown to exist in solution at the same time [31]. In [38], photoisomerization of MCDs was studied theoretically. To characterize the photoisomerization of such dyes, a Hamiltonian model for the electronic structure of a monomethine dye was proposed. A valence bond structure can be associated with each of the three diabatic electronic states, and the model depicts interactions between them.
The quantum yield of intersystem crossing to the triplet state of MCDs in nonviscous solvents is usually close to zero. However, for the Te-substituted dye 12 (Figure 11; X = S, Y = Te) it reaches 10% (heavy atom effect). It also increases in viscous solvents [34].
MCD 2 is capable of forming J-aggregates in aqueous solutions (exhibiting a narrow absorption band with a maximum at ~573 nm) [39].
In [40], the solvatofluorochromic properties of an unusual MCD, furo [2,3-b]pyrazolocyanine 13 (Figure 11), were studied. Its UV-Vis spectra are characterized by the presence of two absorption bands, which is explained by intramolecular charge transfer in the cyanine molecule.

4. Interaction of MCD with DNA and Other Nucleic Acids

4.1. Monomeric MCD

Binding in the minor groove and intercalation between base pairs are the two primary types of noncovalent interactions of a cyanine dye monomer with DNA (Figure 12).
Along with the monomer interaction, the formation of dye aggregates on nucleic acid molecules is possible.
The formation of intercalation complexes is characteristic of cyanine dyes having relatively simple and compact structures with planar aromatic terminal heterocycles. This was shown, in particular, for 2. In [41], the interaction of 2 with dsDNA was studied using spectral-fluorescent methods and via linear dichroism (LD) and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopies. It has been shown that CD and LD measurements can be used to monitor the dye–dsDNA interaction both stoichiometrically and structurally. Dye 2 forms two types of complexes with DNA: intercalation complexes (binding of a monomeric dye, high equilibrium constants, and insensitivity to ionic strength), dimers and J-aggregates in the DNA groove (due to electrostatic interaction) [41]. For intercalation complexes, the complexation constant Ka ~ (9 ± 3) × 105 M−1 was obtained (with one dye binding site per every second base pair); for the complex on the surface, Ka is much lower.
Unsymmetrical MCDs are widely used as nucleic acid probes. Among the dyes of this type, excellent results were obtained for intercalative dyes TO (1, Figure 1) [5,36,42,43] and YO (14, see Figure 13) [44,45]. A feature of these dyes is their very weak intrinsic fluorescence in an aqueous solution (due to the effective dissipation of the electronic excitation energy via intramolecular twisting [36,37]), which can lead to a huge relative increase in the fluorescence intensity upon interaction with nucleic acids. In a noncovalent dye–DNA complex, nonradiative deactivation in MCD molecules is hindered, and the fluorescence quantum yields (Φf) increase sharply. For example, when 1 is in water, Φf = 0.02%; when it is in the presence of dsDNA, Φf = 11% (with the binding constant logKb = 5.5); and when it is bound to single-stranded poly(dG),Φf = 39% [43]. Dye 14 also binds to DNA with fluorescent growth and intercalation between DNA base pairs [44,46].
Spectral-fluorescent characteristics and interaction with dsDNA of 16 new unsymmetrical MCDs were studied in [9]. In solutions (in an unbound form), the dyes practically do not fluoresce; the interaction with dsDNA leads to an increase in the fluorescence intensity. In particular, for dyes 15–19 (see Figure 13), the relative fluorescent growth was 892, 1033, 834, 437, and 340 times, respectively. The dye association constants for the new MCD calculated using the McGhee–von Hippel model range from 2.27 × 104 to 7.58 × 105 L mol−1. The authors suggested an intercalating mechanism for the interaction of the dyes with DNA, but did not present additional results that can directly support this hypothesis.
The interaction of new unsymmetrical MCD 20–26 (Figure 14), containing a benzoselenazole fragment, with dsDNA/RNA was studied in [11,12]. It has been shown that the dyes interact with dsDNA with significant fluorescent growth; the dyes containing a methyl group at the nitrogen atom in the benzothiazole core (dyes 20 and 21) were found to be more suitable as fluorescent markers (up to a 63-fold increase in the fluorescence intensity in the presence of dsDNA). It has been concluded that incorporation of a different heteroatom in the dye structure can lead to a multi-fold increase in the fluorescence intensity of MCDs bound to complexes with DNA. At the same time, the presence of Se atoms led to higher fluorescence intensities of the corresponding free dyes [11]. MCDs containing a Se atom have been proposed as competitive fluorescent probes for nucleic acids [11].
For ligand–biopolymer interaction, CD spectroscopy provides valuable information about the structure of the complex and the location of the ligands. Binding with DNA and RNA induces the appearance of a CD signal of initially achiral dye molecules, and various binding modes (intercalation, binding in grooves and binding of aggregated molecules on the polynucleotide backbone) cause CD signals of different intensities and signs [47,48].
The influence of various substituents in the benzothiazole nuclei of unsymmetrical MCDs containing Se on the noncovalent interaction with nucleic acids was studied via CD spectroscopy [12]. The CD spectra of compounds 20 and 21 indicated the binding of dye monomers in the minor groove of the AT DNA sequences, while GC-DNA induced bisignate signals, which indicated the aggregation of the MCDs in the grooves of the helix.
The design of substituents in the terminal nuclei of MCDs can directly affect the interaction with biomacromolecules. In [49], two guanidiniocarbonyl–pyrrole conjugates (GCP) of MCDs were obtained (dyes 27 and 28; Figure 15), and their interaction with nucleotides was studied. The conjugates practically do not fluoresce in solution and exhibit strong fluorescence in the presence of dsRNA and dsDNA nucleotides.
In [10] the interaction of new benz[c,d]indolium-containing MCDs (see Figure 15, dyes 29–35) with dsDNA was studied by spectral-fluorescent and molecular docking methods. The dyes were proposed as potential fluorescent probes. Docking of dye 30 showed the possibility of the formation of complexes in the small groove of the DNA double helix, and the constant of the complex formation of 30 with DNA was determined (~1 × 104 L mol−1).
The interaction of some TO-fluorinated analogues (dyes 36–39, Figure 16) with DNA was investigated in [50]. It was shown that the presence of fluorine as a substituent significantly improves the photostability and spectral-fluorescent characteristics of the dyes.
Since Coulomb interactions play an important role in the complexation of cationic dyes with nucleic acids, an increase in the positive charge of dye molecules due to the introduction of additional cationic groups into the structure of cyanine dyes, as well as due to the use of dimeric derivatives of cyanines, can increase their affinity for DNA and other nucleic acids.
For binding to DNA, a number of unsymmetrical MCDs with different positive charges, 40–46 (Figure 17), were synthesized and studied using spectral-fluorescent methods [51]. The dyes interact with dsDNA both via intercalation and via complexation on the surface. Some of the studied dyes are able to distinguish between single-stranded and double-stranded polynucleotides, exhibiting different fluorescence spectra. The detection limits (LOD) for most of the dyes with respect to dsDNA (for dye 40, about 70 ng/mL [51]) are comparable to those of ethidium bromide.
Dicationic derivatives of 1, 14, and other MCDs with charged substituents at the N-atom of quinoline or pyridine heterocycles (5, 47, 48, 49, and 50; Figure 18) and their interaction with nucleic acids were thoroughly investigated [45,52,53,54]. For the detection of nucleic acids in solution, other analogues of 1 and 14 were synthesized and proposed (see Figure 5) [19,20,21,55,56,57,58].
An unsymmetrical monomethine dye, MCD 51, was synthesized, in which one of the terminal heterocycles was an acridinium fragment [59]. In solutions (with low viscosity), dye 51 is characterized by low fluorescence (~0.2%). Interestingly, the interaction with dsDNA leads to a decrease in the fluorescent response of dye 51.
The interaction of a number of MCDs, derivatives of Cyan 40 (dye 52 in Figure 19), having different substituents at the N-atom in the pyridinium fragment, with nucleic acids was studied in [60] (dyes 52–57; Figure 19). It was shown that the nature of the functional groups in the dye substituent affects the fluorescent properties of its complexes with DNA [60]. In [61], the equilibrium and kinetics of the binding with DNA of dye 52 were studied using the T-jump method. The binding of the dyes proceeds via the formation of an external complex (a fast step), which, with time, is rearranged into a complex with partial intercalation, which then is converted into a completely intercalated complex [62].
In [63], the effect of complexation with nucleic acids on the photonics of MCDs having benzothiazole heteronuclei and their analogues, as well as five monomethinepyrylium cyanines and their N-methylpyridine analogues, was studied (dyes 52 and 58–65; Figure 20). For the interaction of MCDs (in particular, dye 52) with dsDNA, a half-intercalation model was presented. According to this model, benzothiazole or benzoxazole-based terminal nuclei of MCDs intercalate, whereas pyridine or pyrylium nuclei bind in the DNA groove [63].
The work [64] describes the synthesis and properties of MCD 66 (Figure 21). Non-covalent interaction of 66 with dsDNA leads to an increase in dye emission; the MCD is proposed to replace mutagenic ethidium bromide. Note that the data on the formation of intercalation complexes by the dye and the conclusion made in this work about a one-step scheme of the MCD–DNA reaction leading to the formation of one type of monomeric dye complex require additional verification.
A number of new MCDs (67–75 in Figure 21) were synthesized and studied [65,66]. The dye absorption peaks are between 450 and 500 nm.
In solution, the dyes exhibit low emission, but some become extremely luminescent when binding to DNA. For dye 67, a good LOD was obtained toward dsDNA (100 ng of DNA).
In [66], a significant influence of substituents in terminal heteronuclei was revealed. Substituents in MCD 67–73, which increase the size of dye molecules, together with the possibility of forming H-bonds with DNA (due to the OH-groups of substituents), are favorable for minor groove binding with dsDNA. MCD 74 and 75, which are characterized by compact molecular sizes, can intercalate into dsDNA and dsRNA. The selectivity of dyes 74 and 75 for dsRNA was found.
Numerous studies on various MCD fluorophores led to the emergence of a number of commercially available nucleic acid probes (in particular, SYBR Green I, PicoGreen, SYBR Green II, and SYBR Gold; dyes 76–79, respectively, in Figure 22) [67,68,69,70,71,72].
It has been shown in [69] that SYBR Green I (76 in Figure 22) is capable of both intercalation between dsDNA base pairs and the formation of a highly fluorescent complex on the surface of the double helix. Binding of SYBR Green I to ssDNA results in a significantly lower fluorescence growth (~11-fold lower than with dsDNA). In [70], using fluorescent methods and circular dichroism spectroscopy, the selectivity of PicoGreen (dye 77 in Figure 22) binding to dsDNA and ssDNA was studied in detail. It was shown that in the case of interaction of 77 with dsDNA, the intercalation complex predominates. Authors of [71] noted that the formation of intercalative complexes by dyes, as the main type of binding with dsDNA, in some cases may limit the use of such probes. The authors [73] concluded that 76 and 77 are more sensitive for detection than traditional fluorescent reporters (ethidium bromide and Hoechst 33258) are and can quantify dsDNA at concentrations of about 0.5–1 ng/mL.
In the work [74], using a set of methods (which include single-molecule magnetic tweezers (MT), NMR and mass spectrometry), the structures of MCD 79 (SYBR Gold) and 76 were determined, and their binding to DNA was studied. The experiments showed that the interaction of DNA with the dyes leads to their intercalation and is accompanied by an increase in the fluorescence intensity of the ligands. The binding constant of 76 to DNA was found (from the McGhee–von Hippel model) to be (3.7 ± 0.35) × 106 M−1 and the size of the binding site was n = 1.67 ± 0.04 bases [74]. The structure of 78 (SYBR Green II; Figure 22) was investigated in [13].
Based on the SYBR Green I and II (76 and 78, respectively; Figure 22) chromophore, new functionalized MCDs have been developed (dyes 80–89; Figure 23) [13,75]. The design made it possible to draw some conclusions regarding the structure–property relationship, the influence of differences in heteroatoms (oxygen/sulfur) in the chromophore and substituents.
Upon the interaction with calf thymus DNA, the greatest increase in the fluorescence intensity was obtained for benzoxazole dyes 81 and 82 (an increase of 11.2 and 50 times) [75]. Linear dichroism (LD) spectroscopy showed dye binding to dsDNA via intercalation [13]. The binding constants of dyes 80–89 with calf thymus DNA were 1.3–8.5 × 106 M−1 (according to the McGhee–von Hippel model), the sizes of binding sites varying slightly (n ~ 2.2–3.4 bases) [13,75]. The influence of substituents in heterocycles was studied; the lengthening of alkyl chains leads to the deterioration of binding (dye intercalation conditions are violated, because the sizes of nucleic acid sites increase) [13]. It was concluded [75] that the introduction of heteroatom substituents (S and Cl, dyes 82 and 89 and 80 and 87; Figure 23) into dye molecules increases photostability, but deteriorates the characteristics of the dyes as probes.
Unsymmetrical MCD molecules (90–92; Figure 24) with crescent geometries that fitted the DNA minor groove were obtained [76,77,78,79]. The aggregation of dye 92 in the presence of DNA was discussed; dyes 90–92 bind in the minor groove of the double helix. In the presence of DNA, the dyes have absorption maxima in the region of >500 nm. The formation of complexes proceeds with an increase in the fluorescence intensity (14 and 50 times for 92 and 91, respectively, with a dye/DNA of ratio 1:100). Dye 91 has good potential as a probe for mixed DNA sequences.
The recent work [80] reports the development of MCD based on N-arylpyridocyanine (dyes 93–97; Figure 24) as DNA probes with longer-wavelength absorption (532–561 nm in the presence of DNA). It was found that N-aryl substituents not only shift the spectral maxima, but also significantly increase the efficiency of binding to DNA. CD experiments with dsDNA showed that the dyes bind in the minor groove of the double helix, which should contribute to high selectivity for DNA against RNA. In particular, the fluorescence intensity of dye 93 increased 1600 times when bound to DNA, while only a 110-fold increase was observed with RNA (selectivity 14). Dyes 95 and 96, which have diethylamino and dimethylamino groups in the para positions of the terminal nuclei, have even higher selectivity ratios (32 and 31, respectively). The highest increase in the fluorescence intensity in the presence of DNA was achieved for dye 96 (an increase of 3900 times). The experiments have shown that pyridocyanine 93 specifically binds to nucleotide AT base pairs and shares the same AATT DNA sequences with the Hoechst probe [80].
The data on the spectral-fluorescent studies of the interaction of monomeric MCD with DNA are summarized in Table 2.

4.2. Dimeric MCD Probes

Additionally, widely used as probes are dimeric MCDs based on TO, YO, benzothiazole orange, etc., in which pairs of cyanine chromophores are linked by cationic bridges (in particular, TOTO and YOYO; 98 and 99, respectively; see Figure 25) [25,46,52,53,54,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. The general scheme for the synthesis of dimeric MCDs having 4 positive charges is shown in Figure 8 (see the previous section).
The dimeric dyes 98 and 99 practically do not fluoresce in solution, but upon interaction with dsDNA form electrophoresis-resistant complexes with a greater than 1000-fold fluorescent growth [46]. The stability of complexes of dye 98 with ssDNA was studied in [82] by transferring TOTO from complexes to an excess of unlabeled DNA using gel electrophoresis. Complexes of 98 with DNA were also studied using spectral-fluorescent and CD spectroscopy. It was shown that the affinity of the polycationic dyes for ssDNA and dsDNA could be equally high. In [81], the interaction of dyes of various types (in particular, 99, 76, 77, and 79 (see Figure 22) with ssDNA and dsDNA was studied. Upon the interaction with ssDNA, a broadening of the absorption and fluorescence bands was observed (compared to those of dsDNA). With gel electrophoresis, MCD 98 and 99 allow the determination of restriction fragments of nucleic acids from 600 to 24,000 base pairs. The limit of detection for dsDNA on agarose gel was 4 pg (excitation with a confocal laser), which is about 500 times better than that for ethidium bromide [46]. It was shown in [87] that homodimeric MCDs demonstrate strong fluorescent growth upon binding to ssDNA and dsDNA (LOD (dsDNA): ~1.7 ng/mL). An increase in the fluorescence intensity of 98 and 99 by three orders of magnitude upon binding to nucleic acids dyes was noted in [88]. The dependence of fluorescence intensity on the DNA concentration is linear in the range from 0.5 to 100 ng/mL (for dye 98 complexed with DNA; see PDB structure 108D [84]).
Binding of 98 and 99 to DNA and oligonucleotides was also studied by one and two-dimensional 1H NMR spectroscopy [84,85,86]. Dyes 98 and 99 tend to form several types of complexes with dsDNA; the interaction with oligonucleotides occurs due to bisintercalation. In this case, the main factors in the stabilization of dye–DNA complexes are non-electrostatic forces (hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds). In [89] the interaction of intercalating dyes 5 and 99 with dsDNA was studied using a combination of fluorescence optical microscopy and an optical tweezer setup. It has been shown that intercalation of the dyes between DNA base pairs leads to strand elongation. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRF) was used to elucidate the kinetic characteristics of MCD 99’s interaction with DNA [90].
The interaction of dyes 5, 99 and their derivatives with DNA was investigated using fluorescence stationary and ultrafast time-resolved techniques to elucidate the mechanism of MCD emission growth [91]. It was shown that the formation of H-dimers (weakly fluorescent) is less effective than the formation of MCD isomers for obtaining a good emission contrast. Optimization of the structure of molecules (in particular, the introduction of additional cationic groups) can reduce the contribution of aggregation and increase the sensitivity of probe dyes.
The interaction of four monomeric and dimeric MCDs, 14 (Figure 13), 5, 48 (Figure 18), and 99 (Figure 25), with bacteriophage T5 was investigated in [45]. The studied MCDs were shown to penetrate inside the viral capsid and bind to the viral nucleic acid. The rate of binding also depends on the structure of the dye molecule; an increase in the size of the molecule slows down the process. At 37 °C, for monomeric MCD 14, the process takes several minutes, while for dimeric 99 it takes more than 50 h.
The high sensitivity and stability of the complexes of dimeric MCDs with nucleic acids explain the research interest in new compounds of this type. The study of the interaction of dimeric MCD 100–103 (Figure 26) with ds-polynucleotides and poly-rA–poly-rU showed the selectivity the of new dyes for GC base pairs compared to that of AT [27]. The presence of a positively charged linker results in a significant increase in the fluorescence intensity of the dyes upon binding to GC nucleotides (with AT, the increase is much lower). In experiments on thermal melting, the dimeric dyes are characterized by weaker stabilization of DNA polynucleotides (weaker than that of the monomeric analogues), which is a consequence of the aggregation of 100–103 inside the hydrophobic grooves of polynucleotides (CD spectroscopy also showed aggregation).
Dimeric and trimeric cyanine dyes 104 and 105 (Figure 26) based on pyridocyanine 52 (see Figure 19) were obtained [92]. The spectral-fluorescent properties of the synthesized dyes and their complexes with nucleic acids were studied. In the absence of DNA, the dyes are mainly in the form of H-aggregates; interaction with DNA leads to their decomposition and the formation of highly fluorescent complexes of monomeric dyes. Under conditions of excess DNA, the trimeric dye 105 shows a 1.5–3-times higher increase in the fluorescence intensity than the dimeric dye 104 does. With an excess of the dyes, the formation of H-aggregates on DNA is observed (DNA-induced aggregation). These aggregates have different spectral properties than the dye aggregates without DNA do. This effect can be used for more sensitive detection of DNA [92].
The data on the spectral-fluorescent studies of the interaction of homodimeric MCDs with DNA are summarized in Table 3.

4.3. Aggregation of MCDs on Nucleic Acids

Aggregation of MCDs on nucleic acids often accompanies the interaction of the monomeric dyes with the biopolymers [27,41,59] (see above). In particular, symmetrical MCD 2 forms J-aggregates on DNA, which were studied via LD and CD [41,93]. The recent work [94] reports the formation by dye 2 on ssDNA and dsDNA oligonucleotides of a new type of supramolecular aggregate, the photonics of which differ from those of H- and J-aggregates. Aggregation of dye 2 was studied using CD spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. These superaggregates have the ability to effectively delocalize electronic excited states via the mechanism of exciton migration. It has been shown that the properties of the aggregates can be controlled by modifying the DNA substrate. Electronic excitation energy transfer (FRET) from dye 2 aggregates (donors) to AlexaFluorTM 647 (acceptor) was found and studied [94].
DNA-induced aggregation is also characteristic of unsymmetrical MCDs [27,95]. In particular, dyes 1 and 61 [95] form aggregates on DNA that are characterized by an abnormally large Stokes shift. In the unbound form, the dyes form H-aggregates in solution; in the presence of dsDNA with a 3–5-fold excess of the dyes, aggregates are formed from the free dye and DNA-bound dye (within the “half-intercalation” model). It has been found that benzothiazole MCD 106 (Figure 27) forms ordered dye aggregates on dsDNA templates. It has been shown that these aggregates can serve as efficient energy transfer “wires” in the process of electronic excitation energy transfer from donor to acceptor dye molecules with very small energy loss [96].
Homodimeric and homotrimeric MCD 104 and 105 (Figure 26) form H-aggregates on DNA with an excess of the dyes with respect to the biopolymer, which increases the sensitivity of DNA detection [92,95,97]. Aggregation of dimeric MCD 100–103 in the presence of DNA is reported in [27]. The schematic structures of H- and J-aggregates of cyanines are shown in Figure 27.

4.4. MCD Probes for Non-Canonical Forms of DNA (G-Quadruplexes, Left-Handed DNA, etc.)

At present, investigations of MCD with polynucleotides of different structures continue, and efforts are being made to identify specialized fluorescent reporters for particular polynucleotides and non-canonical forms of DNA. Structures of canonical and some non-canonical forms of DNA are shown in Figure 28.
The interaction of dye 1 with left-handed DNA (Z*–DNA) was studied in [98]. Z*–DNA is formed from B-DNA under the action of alcohol additions or doubly charged Mg2+ ions. Dye 1 interacts with Z*–DNA via a two-step sequential mechanism. At the first stage, electrostatic interactions predominate; at the second stage, the dye is deeply embedded in the biopolymer. The specificity of the interaction between 1 and Z*–DNA was discussed. In [13], the interaction of MCD 82–86 (Figure 23) with various types of nucleic acides was studied. The dyes showed a significant increase in fluorescence intensity. In [94], aggregation of 2 upon the interaction with DNA DX-tile nanostructures was studied.
DNA G–quadruplexes (G4) are guanine-enriched oligonucleotides or polynucleotides capable of forming four-stranded structures in the presence of singly charged cations (K+ ions). In this case, four guanidine residues form a planar structure stabilized by guanine (G)-quartets (eight hydrogen bonds in total). It is known that G4 are located in DNA at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes (telomeres). The function of telomeres is to protect chromosome ends from unwanted damage resulting from recombination or the action of nucleases.
It has been shown [43] that dye 1 binds more effectively to double-stranded (ds) DNA (with the formation of intercalation complexes) than to single-stranded oligonucleotides. Dye 1 also interacts with triplexes and G-quadruplexes of DNA [99,100]. Binding of dye 1 with three-stranded or four-stranded DNA structures leads to an increase in the dye fluorescence intensity by more than 1000 times. Complexes of 1 with triplexes and G-quadruplexes of DNA exhibit high stability and do not dissociate during chromatography and gel electrophoresis procedures [100].
The interaction of 52 with triplexes and G-quadruplexes of DNA was studied [101]. Dye 52 was shown to form very stable, highly fluorescent complexes with a DNA triple helix. The intercalation model describes the complexation of MCD with a DNA G-quadruplex, whereas binding of the dyes to triplexes is probably carried out in the DNA groove.
It has been shown that benzoselenazolyl MCDs with a methyl substituent at the N-atom (dyes 20 and 21; Figure 14) selectively detect DNA G-structures [12]. MCD 23 with a (CH2)2SH group demonstrates differences in the CD spectra upon complexation with dsDNA, RNA, and G-quadruplexes. The results of the study show that the dyes bind to the G-quadruplex via terminal π–π stacking [12]. The possibility of additional stabilization of the complex due to non-covalent interactions with nucleic acid bases/phosphate backbone was shown.

4.5. MCD Probes for RNA

At present, a significant number of MCDs exhibiting selectivity for dsDNA have been developed and studied (many of them are considered above). However, relatively few probes are currently known that are suitable for the selective detection of RNA structures. In particular, bis-benzimide dye probes of the Hoechst type can be used to quantify RNA from the total nucleic acid content. However, the protocol requires the use of ribonuclease, which can reduce sensitivity and increase error [102]. A commercial fluorescent probe, SYTO RNASelect (www.thermofisher.com; accessed on 4 May 2023), with high RNA specificity is also available [103].
The works [104,105] proposed new unsymmetrical MCDs with benzo[c,d]indole and quinoline nuclei as fluorescent probes for RNA (dyes 107–109; Figure 29). The presence of the benzo[c,d]indole residue significantly shifts the maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra of the dyes to longer wavelengths. The presence of side substituents with amino groups improves the interaction with RNA; the RNA selectivity and stability of these dyes is higher than that of SYTO RNAselect. When interacting with RNA, the fluorescence intensity of the dyes in the deep-red spectral region (~657–666 nm) increases by more than 100 times. The fluorescent response of the dyes with aminopropyl groups (108 and 109) for RNA was 2.2–3.4 times higher than that of the methyl-substituted dye, 107; it was also much higher than that for dsDNA. The association constants were of the order of 1.25–4.8 × 103 M−1.
The interaction with DNA and RNA of five unsymmetrical monocationic and dicationic MCD (dyes 64 and 110–113; Figure 29) was studied in [106]. Upon the interaction with yeast total RNA, a 1.3–5.3-fold greater increase in the fluorescent response was observed than that observed in the presence of dsDNA (with a maximum selectivity increase of 5.3 times for dye 113).
The synthesis and interaction with DNA and RNA of new MCDs 114–118 (Figure 29) were described [107]. The electronic spectra were analyzed using TDDFT. The dyes practically do not fluoresce in the unbound state. When interacting with nucleic acids, the spectra of the dyes are shifted to the long-wavelength side by 2–6 nm, and an increase in the fluorescence intensity of the ligands is observed (for dye 114 the increase in the presence of RNA is 114 times). When binding to RNA, the dyes with a Cl substituent (114–116) show a higher increase in the fluorescent response (for 114, this is ~3 times higher) than with DNA. The CD spectra of the dyes showed optical activity—negative signals for dyes 114 and 117 in complexes with RNA—characteristic of intercalative binding [107].
The data from the spectral-fluorescent studies of the interaction of MCDs with RNA are summarized in Table 4.

5. Interaction of MCD with Proteins and Other Biomolecules

A number of new MCDs as possible fluorescent probes for proteins have been synthesized and studied [108]. The dyes were synthesized on the basis of the “affinity-modifying groups” idea, using MCD 52 (Figure 19) as a model. It was shown that specific and accurate detection of bovine serum albumin is possible using dyes 119, 120 and 121 (Figure 30). In particular, for 119 and 120, a ~100-fold fluorescence growth is observed in the presence of albumin.
The interaction of the symmetrical anionic MCD 122 (Figure 30), having two sulfopropyl substituents in 3,3’ positions, with two artificially synthesized polypeptides was studied in [109]. Using UV-Vis, CD spectroscopies, and Cryo-TEM microscopy, it was that, depending on the concentration in the aqueous medium, the dye is in the form of H- or J-aggregates; polypeptide molecules, in turn, form α-helical supramolecular ensembles and β-sheet-rich fibrils. The interaction of 122 with polypeptides leads to the formation of new supramolecular structures of tubular aggregates [109]. CD spectra showed no chirality transfer from peptides to the dye aggregates, and also permitted excluding the opposite effect of a structural transfer from dye aggregates to the peptides’ secondary structure.
J-aggrege formation by dye 122 in the presence of some proteins (gelatin, lysozyme, ribonuclease, and trypsin) was studied using CD [110]. It was shown that the chirality of proteins controls the optical activity of MCD J-aggregates.
Currently, a search is underway for fluorescent probes with specificity for amyloid protein structures; the relevance of these studies is associated with the therapy for a number of neurological disorders. In order to detect fibrillar β-lactoglobulin, two cationic MCDs based on benzothiazole heterocycles, 59 and 123 (Figure 30), were studied (along with a number of trimethine, pentamethine, heptamethine cyanine and squarylium dyes) [111]. The fluorescent response of these dyes for fibrillar β-lactoglobulin was ~3 times higher than that for native β-lactoglobulin.
Additionally, a seach for MCDs that detect amyloid form of α-synuclein was performed (in particular, MCDs 1, 52, 59, 62 and 123–126 (Figure 30) were studied) [112,113,114]. The best results were obtained for dye 123, for which the fluorescence response for fibrillar α-synuclein was 9.5 times higher than that for native α-synuclein.
The interaction of a series of MCDs (dyes 127–131; Figure 31) with insulin and lysozyme in the native and amyloid states was studied [115]. It was found that the emission of MCDs is enhanced by the binding of the dyes with both native and fibrillar proteins. In fibrillar protein–MCD complexes, the effect is stronger than in the cases of proteins in the native form. However, their amyloid (fibrillar) selectivity is much lower compared to that of other amyloid markers [115]. The maximum amyloid detection factors characterizing the selectivity of the dyes toward fibrillar insulin and lysozyme were found to be 8.4 for dye 128 and 5.5 for dye 130. The dyes also show a relatively higher increase in the fluorescence intensity in the presence of insulin amyloid fibrils in comparison with that in the presence of lysozyme, suggesting the sensitivity of the dyes to the fibril morphology.
To identify the monomethine–protein binding sites, the molecular docking technique was used. Residues of the B-chain (Val 17, Leu 17, Ala 14, Phe 1, Gln 4, and Leu 6) and A-chain (Leu 13, Tyr 14, and Glu 17 of insulin) show the MCDs’ binding efficiency and seem to form the strongest complexes with the dyes. It was found that the binding of the investigated cyanines is governed predominantly by hydrophobic interactions between the dye molecule and the insulin residues Val 17, Leu 17, Ala 14, Gln 4, Leu 6, Leu 13, Tyr 14, and Glu 17. Moreover, all the examined dyes tend to form π-stacking contacts between the benzene ring and Phe 1 residue of the B-chain of non-fibrillar insulin. According to molecular docking results, the fibrillar insulin Gln15_Glu17 groove is the most effective binding location for the MCDs under investigation [115].
The interaction of 127–131 (Figure 31) with bacteriophage MS2 was studied [116]. The dyes interact with the bacteriophage with high affinity (~1 μM−1); evidence was presented to support the hypothesis of dye interaction with viral nucleocapsid proteins. Molecular docking showed the possibility of accommodating a dye molecule inside the cleft formed by three proteins composing the virus shell.
The work [117] reports the formation of J-aggregates of dye 2 on the surface of heparin (stimulated aggregation) with a ~400-fold increase in the fluorescence intensity. A strong bisignate signal appears in the CD spectra as a result of excitonic coupling between dye molecules in J-aggregates. Dye 2 exhibits selectivity for heparin; the fluorescence intensity in the presence of heparin is much higher than that in the presence of chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid. The limit of detection of heparin is 2 nM.

6. Photonics of the Dye Molecules in Complexes with Biomolecules

Time-resolved ultrafast fluorescence spectroscopy (TRFS) was used to determine the fluorescence growth mechanism of dyes 5, 14, and 99, as well as their derivatives, in the presence of nucleic acids [91,118]. It has been shown, in particular, that in complexes with DNA the fluorescence lifetimes of the dyes become much longer because of the constrictive DNA environment which inhibits torsional nonradiative deactivation of the dyes’ excited state. Similar data were obtained for dye 5 and its derivatives using femtosecond fluorescence up-conversion spectroscopy [35].
One of the most important properties of cyanine dyes in association with biomacromolecules is their ability to inhibit the processes of nonradiative deactivation. As was shown for trimethine cyanines, this can lead to a significant increase in the quantum yield of the triplet state (ΦT) [3]. The triplet state of the dye can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Since ΦT is usually close to zero for cyanine dyes in the free state, it is generally possible to create highly selective agents for photodynamic therapy (PDT), in which only cyanine dye molecules bound to biomolecules will have a damaging effect, while unbound dye molecules will be inactive.
In the case of MCD, the effect of an increased ΦT was observed for dye 99 (YOYO) in a complex with DNA. In [119], the interaction of dye 99 with DNA fragments of various lengths was studied using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). An increase in ΦT was found in the system, depending on the length of DNA molecules and the DNA/YOYO ratio. The results obtained are proposed to be used for the development of fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy techniques in solutions and in living cells.
A new MCD probe sensitive to DNA hybridization was obtained (132, Figure 32) [120]. A nucleic acid fragment and two TO fluorophores constitute the dye 132 molecule. Through hybridization with the target DNA, the population of the transient dark state, which is attributed to the triplet state and isomerized state, was drastically increased. According to FCS results, the transient dark state population (attributed to the triplet state and isomerized state) was found to significantly increase through hybridization with the target DNA.
Thus, due to the set of their exceptional characteristics, the use of MCDs opens up broad prospects for the development of methods for biomolecule detection/analysis and for the design of new types of molecular probes.

7. Application of Monomethine Cyanine Dyes in Biochemistry and Biomedicine

The outstanding ability of MCDs to greatly enhance the fluorescent response in the presence of biomacromolecules determines the main areas of application of monomethine cyanines. The most important are fluorescent probes and stains for biomolecular analysis, off-on sensors and markers, and visualization of biomacromolecules in biological systems [121]. The application of MCDs as fluorescent probes was considered in detail in the preceding sections. More specific applications of MCDs are considered below.
MCDs of various types are often used in bioanalysis (FFC, PCR methods, fluorescent microscopy, etc.) Dyes 1 and 14 (see Figure 1 and Figure 13) are widely used in modern biomedical practice; in particular, 1 is used in fluorescence-activated cell cytometry (in reticulocyte analysis, the use of dye 1 gives a higher correlation coefficient compared with manual determination) [5]. Flow cytometry also uses monomeric and dimeric MCDs; in particular, 98 (TOTO) and 47 (TO-PRO) [122], 99 (YOYO-1), 5 (YO-PRO-1), and 77 (PicoGreen) [123]. MCD 76 (SYBR Green I), 99 (YOYO-1), 98 (TOTO-1), and 77 (PicoGreen) are used in flow virometry—a new method for characterization of viruses [124]. The possibility of practical application of YO derivatives—dyes 127–131 (Figure 31), as noncovalent fluorescent markers of bacteriophage MS2 was shown in [116]. In the presence of MS2, the dyes showed a significant fluorescent growth, which made it possible to detect low virus concentrations (~2–20 nM/mL). The results outlined in [116] can be used to develop fluorescent viral markers.
For spectral-fluorescent detection of dsDNA in gel electrophoresis, for quantitative detection of dsDNA in solution, and real-time PCR, the commercially available dyes SYBR Green I, PicoGreen, SYBR Green II, and SYBR Gold (76–79; Figure 22) have been developed and widely used [67,68,69,70,71].
Unsymmetrical MCDs are proposed to be used in fluorescence microscopy for staining RNA-containing cell organelles. When staining live and fixed biopreparations of MCF-7 cells, dyes 64 (Figure 20) and 110–113 (Figure 29) penetrate well into cells and nuclei [106].
Unsymmetrical monomethine cyanines with benzo[c,d]indole and quinoline nuclei were proposed as selective fluorescent off-on probes for RNA (quantitative detection of RNA in vitro and visualization of nucleolar RNA in vivo) (dyes 107–109; Figure 29) [104,105]. Dye 133 (Figure 33), proposed in [125], exhibited significant advantages over SYTO RNA select. In particular, dye 133 is characterized by a stronger fluorescent response than SYTO RNA select is upon binding to RNA in the cell nucleoli. Dye 133 exhibited good results in terms of cytotoxicity and permeability through cell membranes.
J-aggregation of dye 2 (PIC) was considered for the detection of heparin in serum samples and complex biological media [117].
Based on benzothiazine, new MCD, 134 (Figure 6 and Figure 33), with reversible acidochromic behavior was obtained. Sensitivity to pH changes makes this dye an attractive prototype of a new modular chromophore [22].
In [126], MCDs 135 (Figure 33) and 98 (Figure 25), together with various dimethine and trimethine cyanine dyes, were studied for dsDNA (lambda phage DNA) quantification using gel electrophoresis. MCD 135 (a butyl homologue of 1) can be proposed for DNA detection; this dye proved to be more sensitive than the commonly used ethidium bromide did. Of all dyes studied, the most sensitive were 98 and 135.
A high-sensitivity method for DNA detection with MCDs using the stopped-flow technique was proposed. It was based on measuring the initial rate of dye 99 (YOYO)’s fluorescent growth in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate upon the introduction of DNA. This method makes it possible to detect very low concentrations of DNA (~3.0 × 10−10 M) [127].
Monomethine N-aryl pyridocyanines (dyes 93–97; Figure 24) [80] are proposed as new types of cell markers for fluorescence spectroscopy. In mammalian cells and plant cell preparations, dyes 93–97 stain both nuclear and organelle DNA. The dyes are suitable for imaging beyond optical resolution and in two-photon microscopy techniques; they can be used for deep-tissue imaging.
A new polycationic unsymmetrical MCD, 136 (Figure 33), was used to count the number and determine the viability of yeast cells using an image-based cytometry method [128]. The dye penetrates only into dead cells, binds rapidly to DNA (20 times faster than 99 does), and has a weak background and high sensitivity to DNA (in the presence of DNA, the dye has a fluorescence intensity that is 10 times higher than that of propidium iodide). The method proposed by the authors has a low coefficient of variation.
The results of studies of MCDs based on SYBR green II (dyes 82–86; Figure 23) covalently bound to the viral capsid can pave the way for a further application of these compounds in biological objects for the detection of RNA in viruses [13].
To detect DNA mutations, sequence-specific forced intercalation hybridization probes based on dyes 1 and 14 were suggested [129,130,131,132,133]. Upon hybridization with corresponding target DNA, the fluorescence of the probes increased and was sensitive to structural disturbances of NA caused by the mismatch of neighboring bases. Dyes 137–140 were also tested [134]. Dyes 137–140 exhibit high affinity and can be used to detect matched and non-matched targets under non-stringent hybridization conditions.
In particular, single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy (MFS) makes extensive use of MCD [135,136,137]. In [138], 12 monodimeric and homodimeric MCDs (in particular, dyes 141–145, Figure 34) were studied using the single-DNA molecule technique in comparison with commercially available homodimeric MCDs (dye 99, Figure 25). Monomeric dyes 141–144 and the dimeric symmetrical MCD 145 are quite photostable and were selected as prospective dyes for nucleic acid detection.
In living cells, monomethine cyanines are able to demonstrate not only an increase in fluorescence intensity, but also effects of inhibition of cell activity (that is, they have a theranostic potential). The work [12] provides data on the activity of selenocyanines 20–26 (Figure 14) against human cancer cells. Confocal microscopy data confirm the potential of the novel unsymmetrical MCDs 20–26 as theranostic agents. The dyes with sulfopropyl and thioethyl substituents accumulate in mitochondria, while cyanine with a methyl substituent is localized in the nucleus.
New MCDs (dyes 100–103; Figure 26) were proposed as theranostic agents; the dyes showed cell growth-inhibitory effects on cancer cells (lines HCT 116; MCF-7 and H460) [21]. Screening against human lung carcinoma (A549) showed that guanidiniocarbonylpyrrole conjugates of MCDs accumulate effectively in cell mitochondria, causing moderate cytotoxic effects, which make them favorable for use in theranostics [49].
With encouraging success, photodynamic therapy (PDT), a non-invasive and general treatment strategy, is being used to treat pathogenesis (especially in the case of antibiotic resistance). Photosensitizers activated by light can generate excess amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can highly suppress or kill pathogens. Usually, cyanine dyes with a longer polymethine chain than that of MCDs are used in PDT [139]. Nevertheless, there are some studies on PDT with MCDs. The recent work [140] studied the photodynamic activity of the symmetrical “simplest” MCD, dye 146 (Figure 35), in a carbomer gel (CBMG) filler. As a part of the Cy-CBMG system, the solubility of the dye in water is significantly better, and photodegradation occurs less. Dye 146 in CBMG has good biocompatibility, effectively destroys antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro, and promotes wound healing in vivo.
In the work [26], a number of dicationic analogues of 1 and tetracationic analogues of the dimeric dye 98 were synthesized. It was concluded that the dyes obtained indicate significance in singlet oxygen sensitization and are potential candidates in the area of PDT. For chalcogenopyrylium monomethine dyes (dyes 9–12; Figure 11), an increase in ΦT in viscous solvents and with Te-substitution was observed, which could be potentially used in PDT [34].
Cyanine dyes are actively studied as sensitizers in PDT, but their antiproliferative activity in the absence of light has been studied less. New work [8] is devoted to the study of the antiproliferative effects, selectivity, and the effect of light on the cytotoxic activity of a number of cyanines (including symmetrical MCDs, that are butyl homologues of 3; dyes 59 and 147–152) in relation to human tumor cells. It is demonstrated that 147–152 have antiproliferative impacts on the Caco-2, MCF-7, and PC-3 cancer lines.

8. Conclusions

To date, a huge variety of MCD have been produced and investigated for nucleic acid detection and analyses. In addition, noncovalent interactions of various types of MCD not only with natural DNA and RNA, but also with a number of other polynucleotides and oligonucleotides and non-canonical forms of DNA were studied by spectral-fluorescent and other methods. Note that strong spectral shifts upon binding to nucleic acids are not typical of MCD probes (if this is not accompanied by decomposition and/or a formation of dye aggregates), but, as a rule, a significant upturn in fluorescence response is observed. A variety of MCDs were chosen as sensitive molecular reporters suited for the quantification of of DNA in biological systems and for their use in various biophysical and biomedical applications. For example, the limit of dsDNA detection using TOTO and YOYO was found to be about 0.5 ng/mL, or 20 pg in a 25 µL well [88]; dyes SYBR Green I and PicoGreen (76 and 77, respectively) can quantify dsDNA at concentrations of ~0.5–1 ng/mL [73].
Some MCD probes are commercially available from the following main suppliers: Merck (Sigma-Aldrich), Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Biosynth. Merck purchases TO (1), YO (14), SYBR Green I and II (76 and 78, respectively); Thermo Fisher Scientific purchases the TOTO (98) and TO-Pro (47) families of dyes, as well as SYBR Green I and II, PicoGreen (77), and SYBR Gold (79); Biosynth purchases TO, YO and SYBR Green I.
At the same time, it should be noted that a lot of MCD probes exhibit high sensitivity to DNA, but much less probes are highly sensitive to RNA, especially in the presence of DNA, showing high selectivity for RNA. Therefore, works devoted to the elaboration of sensitive cyanine dye probes selective for RNA against the presence of DNA are particularly valuable and require further development. Additionally, welcomed are studies on MCD probes for non-canonical forms of DNA: triplexes and G-quadruplexes, left-handed DNA, plasmid DNA, ssDNA, etc.
There are some common structure–activity relationships for dye probes that were revealed in studies of the dye–DNA interaction. The planar shape and compact size of MCD molecules are structurally better suited for the formation of DNA intercalation complexes. Larger, crescent-shaped MCD molecules often bind in the groove of DNA. (Poly)cationic substituents in dye molecules can substantially increase the affinity of MCDs to nucleic acids. Furthermore, several affinity-modifying groups in MCD molecules can drastically change the characteristics of the dye–nucleic acid interaction. These auxiliary groups have the ability to non-covalently bind to biopolymers and increase MCD affinity. Importantly, the presence of affinity-modifying groups in the MCD structure should not create addition steric barriers to MCD intercalation or nucleic acid groove binding [60].
In addition, in contrast to the great number of works on MCD probes for nucleic acids, a relatively small number of works on such probes for other biomacromolecules are available. This research area should also be developed. The creation of spectral-fluorescent probes for amyloid proteins is necessary because of the association of the latter with a wide range of neuropathies (for example, ALS, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases, motor neuron diseases).
Finally, there are very few works on the study of photochemical processes in MCD molecules in complexes with biomacromolecules, primarily concerning the generation of the triplet state of a MCD and its quenching by molecular oxygen (and other triplet quenchers). In addition to fundamental significance, this study can give information about the peculiarities of localization of the ligand molecule in the biomolecular framework and its possible shielding from the access of a quencher molecule. This is also of great practical importance for PDT, since it creates the basis for the development of selective PDT agents. Such agents would be photochemically active (and could generate singlet oxygen) only in a complex with a target biomolecule and would be inactive in the free state.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.T.; resources, A.S.T. and P.G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.T. and P.G.P.; writing—review and editing, A.S.T. and P.G.P.; funding acquisition, A.S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was carried out under the State Assignment of IBCP RAS (state registry no. 001201253314).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mishra, A.; Behera, R.K.; Behera, P.K.; Mishra, B.K.; Behera, G.B. Cyanines during the 1990s: A review. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1973–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tatikolov, A.S. Polymethine dyes as spectral-fluorescent probes for biomacromolecules. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2012, 13, 55–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pronkin, P.G.; Tatikolov, A.S. Photonics of trimethine cyanine dyes as probes for biomolecules. Molecules 2022, 27, 6367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Williams, C.G. XXVI.—Researches on chinoline and its homologues. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 1857, 21, 377–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, L.G.; Chen, C.H.; Chiu, L.A. Thiazole orange: A new dye for reticulocyte analysis. Cytometry 1986, 7, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamer, F.M. The Cyanine Dyes and Related Compounds; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1964; p. 790. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooker, L.G.S.; Keyes, G.H.; Williams, W.W. Color and constitution. V. The absorption of unsymmetrical cyanines. Resonance as a basis for a classification of dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Serrano, J.L.; Maia, A.; Santos, A.O.; Lima, E.; Reis, L.V.; Nunes, M.J.; Boto, R.E.F.; Silvestre, S.; Almeida, P. An insight into symmetrical cyanine dyes as promising selective antiproliferative agents in Caco-2 colorectal cancer cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaloyanova, S.; Trusova, V.M.; Gorbenko, G.P.; Deligeorgiev, T. Synthesis and fluorescence characteristics of novel asymmetric cyanine dyes for DNA detection. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2011, 217, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soriano, E.; Holder, C.; Levitz, A.; Henary, M. Benz[c,d]indolium-containing monomethine cyanine dyes: Synthesis and photophysical properties. Molecules 2015, 21, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kurutos, A.; Gadjev, N.; Deligeorgiev, T. Synthesis of novel asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes containing benzoselenazolyl moiety. Fluorescent dsDNA probes. Acta Sci. Nat. 2015, 2, 90–98. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fabijanić, I.; Kurutos, A.; Tomašić Paić, A.; Tadić, V.; Kamounah, F.S.; Horvat, L.; Brozovic, A.; Crnolatac, I.; Radić Stojković, M. Selenium-substituted monomethine cyanine dyes as selective G-quadruplex spectroscopic probes with theranostic potential. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saarnio, V.K.; Salorinne, K.; Ruokolainen, V.P.; Nilsson, J.R.; Tero, T.-R.; Oikarinen, S.; Wilhelmsson, L.M.; Lahtinen, T.M.; Marjomäki, V.S. Development of functionalized SYBR green II related cyanine dyes for viral RNA detection. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 177, 108282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deligeorgiev, T.; Kaloyanova, S.; Vasilev, A. A novel general method for preparation of neutral monomethine cyanine dyes. Dye. Pigment. 2011, 90, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alganzory, H.H.; Arief, M.M.H.; Amine, M.S.; Ebeid, E.-Z.M. Microwave-assisted solvent-free synthesis and fluorescence spectral characteristics of some monomethine cyanine dyes. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2014, 6, 143–161. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Gadjev, N.I.; Drexhage, K.-H.; Sabnis, R.W. Preparation of intercalating dye thiazole orange and derivatives. Dye. Pigment. 1995, 29, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Zaneva, D.A.; Katerinopoulos, H.E.; Kolev, V.N. A novel method for the preparation of monomethine cyanine dyes. Dye. Pigment. 1999, 41, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gadjev, N.I.; Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Kim, S.H. Preparation of monomethine cyanine dyes as noncovalent labels for nucleic acids. Dye. Pigment. 1999, 40, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deligeorgiev, T.; Vasilev, A.; Drexhage, K.-H. Synthesis of novel monomeric cyanine dyes containing 2-hydroxypropyl and 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl substituents–noncovalent labels for nucleic acids. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 73, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deligeorgiev, T.; Vasilev, A.; Tsvetkova, T.; Drexhage, K.-H. Synthesis of novel monomeric asymmetric tri- and tetracationic monomethine cyanine dyes as fluorescent non-covalent nucleic acid labels. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 75, 658–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deligeorgiev, T.; Vasilev, A.; Drexhage, K.-H. Synthesis of novel cyanine dyes containing carbamoylethyl component-Noncovalent labels for nucleic acids detection. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 74, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alfieri, M.L.; Panzella, L.; d’Ischia, M.; Napolitano, A. Bioinspired heterocyclic partnership in a cyanine-type acidichromic chromophore. Molecules 2020, 25, 3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eissa, F.M.; Abdel Hameed, R.S. Efficient green synthesis of monomethine cyanines via grinding under solvent-free conditions. Green Process Synth. 2016, 5, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fei, X.; Yang, S.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Z.; Gu, Y. Solid-phase synthesis and modification of thiazole orange and its derivatives and their spectral properties. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Gadjev, N.I.; Timtcheva, I.I.; Maximova, V.A.; Katerinopoulos, H.E.; Foukaraki, E. Synthesis of homodimeric monomethine cyanine dyes as noncovalent nucleic acid labels and their absorption and fluorescence spectral characteristics. Dye. Pigment. 2000, 44, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alganzory, H.H.; El-Sayed, W.A.; Arief, M.H.; Amine, M.S.; Ebeid, E.M. Microwave synthesis and fluorescence properties of homo- and heterodimeric monomethine cyanine dyes TOTO and their precursors. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2017, 10, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mikulin, I.; Ljubić, I.; Piantanida, I.; Vasilev, A.; Mondeshki, M.; Kandinska, M.; Uzelac, L.; Martin-Kleiner, I.; Kralj, M.; Tumir, L.-M. Polycationic monomeric and homodimeric asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes with hydroxypropyl functionality—Strong affinity nucleic acids binders. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tredwell, C.J.; Keary, C.M. Picosecond time resolved fluorescence lifetimes of the polymethine and related dyes. Chem. Phys. 1979, 43, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Åberg, U.; Åkesson, E.; Sundström, V. Excited state dynamics of barrierless isomerization in solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 215, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Åberg, U.; Åkesson, E.; Alvarez, J.-L.; Fedchenia, I.; Sundström, V. Femtosecond spectral evolution monitoring the bond-twisting event in barrierless isomerization in solution. Chem. Phys. 1994, 183, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sahyun, M.R.V.; Blair, J.T. Photophysics of a ”simple” cyanide dye. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1997, 104, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dietzek, B.; Yartsev, A.; Tarnovsky, A.N. Watching ultrafast barrierless excited-state isomerization of pseudocyanine in real time. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4520–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Weigel, A.; Pfaffe, M.; Sajadi, M.; Mahrwald, R.; Improta, R.; Barone, V.; Polli, D.; Cerullo, G.; Ernsting, N.P.; Santoro, F. Barrierless photoisomerisation of the ‘‘simplest cyanine’’: Joining computational and femtosecond optical spectroscopies to trace the full reaction path. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 13350–13364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Piontkowski, Z.; Mark, D.J.; Bedics, M.A.; Sabatini, R.P.; Mark, M.F.; Detty, M.R.; McCamant, D.W. Excited state torsional processes in chalcogenopyrylium monomethine dyes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 8807–8822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fűrstenberg, A.; Vauthey, E. Ultrafast excited-state dynamics of oxazole yellow DNA intercalators. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 12610–12620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karunakaran, V.; Lustres, J.L.P.; Zhao, L.; Ernsting, N.P.; Seitz, O. Large dynamic Stokes shift of DNA intercalation dye thiazole orange has contribution from a high-frequency mode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2954–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Z.; Cao, S.; Li, H.; Li, D.; He, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Xu, J.; Knutson, J.R. Ultrafast excited-state dynamics of thiazole orange. Chem. Phys. 2022, 553, 111392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Olsen, S.; McKenzie, R.H. Conical intersections, charge localization, and photoisomerization pathway selection in a minimal model of a degenerate monomethine dye. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 234306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Herz, A.H. Aggregation of sensitizing dyes in solution and their adsorption onto silver halides. Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci. 1997, 8, 237–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shindy, H.A.; El-Maghraby, M.A.; Eissa, F.M. Solvatochromism and halochromism of some furo/pyrazole cyanine dyes. Chem. Int. 2021, 7, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Norden, B.; Tjerneld, F. Optical studies on complexes between DNA and pseudoisocyanine. Biophys. Chem. 1977, 6, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rye, H.S.; Quesada, M.A.; Peck, K.; Mathies, R.A.; Glazer, A.N. High-sensitivity two-color detection of double-stranded DNA with a confocal fluorescence gel scanner using ethidium homodimer and thiazole orange. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nygren, J.; Svanvik, N.; Kubista, M. The interactions between the fluorescent dye thiazole orange and DNA. Biopolymers 1998, 46, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Larsson, A.; Carlsson, C.; Jonsson, M. Characterization of the binding of YO to [poly(dA-dT)]2 and [poly(dG-dC)]2, and of the fluorescent properties of YO and YOYO complexed with the polynucleotides and double-stranded DNA. Biopolymers 1995, 36, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Eriksson, M.; Härdelin, M.; Larsson, A.; Bergenholtz, J.; Akerman, B. Binding of intercalating and groove-binding cyanine dyes to bacteriophage T5. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rye, H.S.; Yue, S.; Wemmer, D.E.; Quesada, M.A.; Haugland, R.P.; Mathies, R.A.; GIazer, A.N. Stable fluorescent complexes of double-stranded DNA with bis-intercalating asymmetric cyanine dyes: Properties and applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 2803–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rodger, A.; Norden, B. Circular Dichroism and Linear Dichroism; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1997; Volume 1, p. 160. [Google Scholar]
  48. Šmidlehner, T.; Piantanida, I.; Pescitelli, G. Polarization spectroscopy methods in the determination of interactions of small molecules with nucleic acids–tutorial. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 84–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Šmidlehner, T.; Košćak, M.; Božinović, K.; Majhen, D.; Schmuck, C.; Piantanida, I. Fluorimetric and CD recognition between various ds-DNA/RNA depends on a cyanine connectivity in cyanine-guanidiniocarbonyl-pyrrole conjugate. Molecules 2020, 25, 4470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Silva, G.L.; Ediz, V.; Yaron, D.; Armitage, B.A. Experimental and computational investigation of unsymmetrical cyanine dyes: Understanding torsionally responsive fluorogenic dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5710–5718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Timtcheva, I.; Maximova, V.; Deligeorgiev, T.; Zaneva, D.; Ivanov, I. New asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes for nucleic-acid labeling: Absorption and fluorescence spectral characteristics. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2000, 130, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carlsson, C.; Larsson, A.; Jonsson, M.; Albinsson, B.; Norden, B. Optical and photophysical properties of the oxazole yellow DNA probes YO and YOYO. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 10313–10321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Larsson, A.; Carlsson, C.; Jonsson, M.; Albinsson, B. Characterization of the binding of the fluorescent dyes YO and YOYO to DNA by polarized light spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8459–8465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Netzel, T.L.; Nafisi, K.; Zhao, M.; Lenhard, J.R.; Johnson, I. Base-content dependence of emission enhancements, quantum yields, and lifetimes for cyanine dyes bound to double-strand DNA: Photophysical properties of monomeric and bichromophoric DNA stains. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17936–17947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Deligeorgiev, T.; Timtcheva, I.; Maximova, V.; Gadjev, N.; Drexhage, K.-H. Fluorescence characteristics of variously charged asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes in the presence of nucleic acids. J. Fluor. 2002, 12, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vasilev, A.; Deligeorgiev, T.; Gadjev, N.; Drexhage, K.-H. Synthesis of novel monomeric and homodimeric cyanine dyes based on oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium and quinolinium end groups for nucleic acid detection. Dye. Pigment. 2005, 66, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mikelsons, L.; Carra, C.; Shaw, M.; Schweitzer, C.; Scaiano, J.C. Experimental and theoretical study of the interaction of single-stranded DNA homopolymers and a monomethine cyanine dye: Nature of specific binding. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2005, 4, 798–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Timcheva, I.I.; Maximova, V.A.; Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Gadjev, N.I.; Sabnis, R.W.; Ivanov, I.G. Fluorescence spectral characteristics of novel asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes in nucleic acid solutions. FEBS Lett. 1997, 405, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Mahmood, T.; Paul, A.; Ladame, S. Synthesis and spectroscopic and DNA-binding properties of fluorogenic acridine-containing cyanine dyes. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yarmoluk, S.M.; Kovalska, V.B.; Kryvorotenko, D.V.; Balanda, A.O.; Ogul’chansky, T.Y. Interaction of cyanine dyes with nucleic acids. XXV. Influence of affinity-modifying groups in the structure of benzothiazol-4-[2,6-dimethylpyridinium] dyes on the spectral properties of the dyes in the presence of nucleic acids. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2001, 57, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Biver, T.; De Biasi, A.; Secco, F.; Venturini, M.; Yarmoluk, S. Cyanine dyes as intercalating agents: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the DNA/Cyan40 and DNA/CCyan2 systems. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Biver, T.; Pulzonetti, M.; Secco, F.; Venturini, M.; Yarmoluk, S. A kinetic analysis of cyanine selectivity: CCyan2 and Cyan40 intercalation into poly(dA-dT) x poly(dA-dT) and poly(dG-dC) x poly(dG–dC). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 451, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yarmoluk, S.M.; Lukashov, S.S.; Ogul’chansky, T.Y.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Kornyushyna, O.S. Interaction of cyanine dyes with nucleic acids. XXI. Arguments for half-intercalation model of interaction. Biopolymers (Biospectroscopy) 2001, 62, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. El-Shishtawy, R.M.; Asiri, A.M.; Basaif, S.A.; Sobahi, T.R. Synthesis of a new B-naphthothiazole monomethine cyanine dye for the detection of DNA in aqueous solution. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2010, 75, 1605–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Gadjev, N.I.; Vasilev, A.A.; Maximova, V.A.; Timcheva, I.I.; Katerinopoulos, H.E.; Tsikalas, G.K. Synthesis and properties of novel asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes as non-covalent labels for nucleic acids. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 75, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Glavas-Obrovac, L.; Piantanida, I.; Marczi, S.; MaSi¢, L.; Timcheva, I.I.; Deligeorgiev, T.G. Minor structural differences of monomethine cyanine derivatives yield strong variation in their interactions with DNA, RNA as well as on their in vitro antiproliferative activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 4747–4755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tuma, R.S.; Beaudet, M.P.; Jin, X.; Jones, L.J.; Cheung, C.Y.; Yue, S.; Singer, V.L. Characterization of SYBR Gold nucleic acid gel stain: A dye optimized for use with 300-nm ultraviolet transilluminators. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 268, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Williams, L.R. Staining nucleic acids and proteins in electrophoresis gels. Biotech. Histochem. 2001, 76, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zipper, H.; Brunner, H.; Bernhagen, J.; Vitzthum, F. Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, e103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Schweitzer, C.; Scaiano, J.C. Selective binding and local photophysics of the fluorescent cyanine dye PicoGreen in double-stranded and single-stranded DNA. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 4911–4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Koba, M.; Szostek, A.; Konopa, J. Limitation of usage of PicoGreen dye in quantitative assays of double-stranded DNA in the presence of intercalating compounds. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2007, 54, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. The Molecular Probes Handbook. Nucleic Acid Detection and Analysis—Chapter 8. Nucleic Acid Stains—Section 8.1. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.com/ru/ru/home/references/molecular-probes-the-handbook/nucleic-acid-detection-and-genomics-technology/nucleic-acid-stains.html (accessed on 28 March 2023).
  73. Rengarajan, K.; Cristol, S.M.; Mehta, M.; Nickerson, J.M. Quantifying DNA concentrations using fluorometry: A comparison of fluorophores. Mol. Vis. 2002, 8, 416–421. Available online: http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v8/a49 (accessed on 4 May 2023). [PubMed]
  74. Kolbeck, P.J.; Vanderlinden, W.; Gemmecker, G.; Gebhardt, C.; Lehmann, M.; Lak, A.; Nicolaus, T.; Cordes, T.; Lipfert, J. Molecular structure, DNA binding mode, photophysical properties and recommendations for use of SYBR Gold. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 5143–5158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Saarnio, V.K.; Alarantaa, J.M.; Lahtinen, T.M. Systematic study of SYBR green chromophore reveals major improvement with one heteroatom difference. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 3484–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Karlsson, H.J.; Lincoln, P.; Westman, G. Synthesis and DNA binding studies of a new asymmetric cyanine dye binding in the minor groove of [poly(dA-dT)]. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Karlsson, H.J.; Eriksson, M.; Perzon, E.; Akerman, B.; Lincoln, P.; Westman, G. Groove-binding unsymmetrical cyanine dyes for staining of DNA: Syntheses and characterization of the DNA-binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 6227–6234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Eriksson, M.; Karlsson, H.J.; Westman, G.; Akerman, B. Groove-binding unsymmetrical cyanine dyes for staining of DNA: Dissociation rates in free solution and electrophoresis gels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 6235–6242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Karlson, H.J.; Bergqvist, M.H.; Lincoln, P.; Westman, G. Syntheses and DNA-binding studies of a series of unsymmetrical cyanine dyes: Structural influence on the degree of minor groove binding to natural DNA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 2369–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Uno, K.; Sugimoto, N.; Sato, Y. N-aryl pyrido cyanine derivatives are nuclear and organelle DNA markers for two-photon and super-resolution imaging. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cosa, G.; Focsaneanu, K.-S.; McLean, J.R.N.; McNamee, J.P.; Scaiano, J.C. Photophysical properties of fluorescent DNA-dyes bound to single- and double-stranded DNA in aqueous buffered solution. Photochem. Photobiol. 2001, 73, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rye, H.S.; Glazer, A.N. Interaction of dimeric intercalating dyes with single-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 1215–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hansen, L.F.; Jensen, L.K.; Jacobsen, J.P. Bis-intercalation of a homodimeric thiazole orange dye in DNA in symmetrical pyrimidine–pyrimidine–purine–purine oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Spielmann, H.P.; Wemmer, D.E.; Jacobsen, J.P. Solution structure of a DNA complex with the fluorescent bis-intercalator TOTO determined by NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 8542–8553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Johansen, F.; Jacobsen, J.P. 1H NMR studies of the bis-intercalcation of a homodimeric oxazole yellow dye in DNA oligonucleotides. J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam. 1998, 16, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jacobsen, J.P.; Pedersen, J.B.; Hansen, L.F.; Wemmer, D.E. Site selective bis-intercalation of a homodimeric thiazole orange dye in DNA oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Timtcheva, I.; Maximov, V.; Deligeorgiev, T.; Gadjev, N.; Drexhage, K.H.; Petkova, I. Homodimeric monomethine cyanine dyes as fluorescent probes of biopolymers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2000, 58, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rye, H.S.; Dabora, J.M.; Quesada, M.A.; Mathies, R.A.; Glazer, A.N. Fluorometric assay using dimeric dyes for double- and single-stranded DNA and RNA with picogram sensitivity. Anal. Biochem. 1993, 208, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Murade, C.U.; Subramaniam, V.; Otto, C.; Bennink, M.L. Interaction of oxazole yellow dyes with DNA studied with hybrid optical tweezers and fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 2009, 97, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Reuter, M.; Dryden, D.T.F. The kinetics of YOYO-1 intercalation into single molecules of double-stranded DNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 403, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Furstenberg, A.; Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Gadjev, N.I.; Vasilev, A.A.; Vauthey, E. Structure—Fluorescence contrast relationship in cyanine DNA intercalators: Towards rational dye design. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 8600–8609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ogul’chansky, T.Y.; Yashchuk, V.M.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Kocheshev, I.O.; Yarmoluk, S.M. Interaction of cyanine dyes with nucleic acids. XVII. Towards an aggregation of cyanine dyes in solutions as a factor facilitating nucleic acid detection. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2000, 56, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Norden, B. Linear and circular dichroism of polymeric pseudoisocyanine. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chiriboga, M.; Green, C.M.; Mathur, D.; Hastman, D.A.; Melinger, J.C.; Veneziano, R.; Medintz, I.L.; Díaz, S.A. Structural and optical variation of pseudoisocyanine aggregates nucleated on DNA substrates. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2023, 11, 014003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ogul’chansky, T.Y.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Kovalska, V.B.; Yashchuk, V.M.; Yarmoluk, S.M. Interactions of cyanine dyes with nucleic acids. XXIV. Aggregation of monomethine cyanine dyes in presence of DNA and its manifestation in absorption and fluorescence spectra. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2001, 57, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhou, X.; Mandal, S.; Jiang, S.; Lin, S.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Whitten, D.G.; Woodbury, N.W.; Yan, H. Efficient long-range, directional energy transfer through DNA templated dye aggregates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 8473–8481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yarmoluk, S.; Kovalska, V.; Kocheshev, I. Influence of the aggregation of homo-N-mer cyanine dyes on the nucleic acids detection sensitivity. J. Fluor. 2002, 12, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Biver, T.; Garcia, B.; Leal, J.M.; Secco, F.; Turriani, E. Left-handed DNA: Intercalation of the cyanine thiazole orange and structural changes. A kinetic and thermodynamic approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 13309–13317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Monchaud, D.; Allain, C.; Teulade-Fichou, M.P. Thiazole orange: A useful probe for fluorescence sensing of G-quadruplex-ligand interactions. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2007, 26, 1585–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lubitz, I.; Zikich, D.; Kotlyar, A. Specific high-affinity binding of thiazole orange to triplex and G-quadruplex DNA. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 3567–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kovalska, V.B.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Yarmoluk, S.M.; Lubitz, I.; Kotlyar, A.B. Mono and trimethine cyanines Cyan 40 and Cyan 2 as probes for highly selective fluorescent detection of non-canonical DNA structures. J. Fluor. 2011, 21, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Doynikova, A.N.; Vekshin, N.L. Fluorescent determination of micro-quantities of RNA using Hoechst 33258 and binase. Anal. Biochem. 2019, 576, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lu, C.; Lei, S.; Li, J.; Du, G. Quantitation of RNA by a fluorometric method using the SYTO RNASelect stain. Anal. Biochem. 2020, 606, 113857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yoshino, Y.; Sato, Y.; Nishizawa, S. Deep-red light-up signaling of benzo[c,d]indole–quinoline monomethine cyanine for imaging of nucleolar RNA in living cells and for sequence-selective RNA analysis. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 14254–14260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sato, Y.; Igarashi, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Higuchi, K.; Nishizawa, S. Deep-red fluorogenic cyanine dyes carrying an amino group-terminated side chain for improved RNA detection and nucleolar RNA imaging. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 35436–35439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Aristova, D.; Kosach, V.; Chernii, S.; Slominsky, Y.; Balanda, A.; Filonenko, V.; Yarmoluk, S.; Rotaru, A.; Gizem Özkan, H.; Mokhir, A.; et al. Monomethine cyanine probes for visualization of cellular RNA by fluorescence microscopy. Methods Appl. Fluor. 2021, 9, 045002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kandinska, M.I.; Cheshmedzhieva, D.V.; Kostadinov, A.; Rusinov, K.; Rangelov, M.; Todorova, N.; Ilieva, S.; Ivanov, D.P.; Videva, V.; Lozanov, V.S.; et al. Tricationic asymmetric monomeric monomethine cyanine dyes with chlorine and trifluoromethyl functionality–fluorogenic nucleic acids probes. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 342, 117501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yarmoluk, S.M.; Kryvorotenko, D.V.; Balanda, A.O.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Kovalska, V.B. Proteins and cyanine dyes. Part III. Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of benzothiazolo-4-[1,2,6-trimethylpyridinium] monomethine cyanine dyes for fluorescent detection of bovine serum albumin in solutions. Dye. Pigment. 2001, 51, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Berlepsch, H.; Brandenburg, E.; Koksch, B.; Bottcher, C. Peptide adsorption to cyanine dye aggregates revealed by cryo-transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir 2010, 26, 11452–11460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Slavnova, T.O.; Görner, H.; Chibisov, A.K. Cyanine-based J-aggregates as a chirality-sensing supramolecular system. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011, 115, 3379–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Volkova, K.D.; Kovalska, V.B.; Balanda, A.O.; Vermeij, R.J.; Subramaniam, V.; Slominskii, Y.L.; Yarmoluk, S.M. Cyanine dye–protein interactions: Looking for fluorescent probes for amyloid structures. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2007, 70, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Volkova, K.D.; Kovalska, V.B.; Balanda, A.O.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Golub, A.G.; Vermeij, R.J.; Subramaniam, V.; Tolmachev, O.I.; Yarmoluk, S.M. Specific fluorescent detection of fibrillar α-synuclein using mono- and trimethine cyanine dyes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 1452–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Volkova, K.D.; Kovalska, V.B.; Segers-Nolten, G.M.; Veldhuis, G.; Subramaniam, V.; Yarmoluk, S.M. Explorations of the application of cyanine dyes for quantitative α-synuclein detection. Biotech Histochem. 2009, 84, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Volkova, K.D.; Kovalska, V.B.; Losytskyy, M.Y.; Veldhuis, G.; Segers-Nolten, G.M.J.; Tolmachev, O.I.; Subramaniam, V.; Yarmoluk, S.M. Studies of interaction between cyanine dye T-284 and fibrillar alpha-synuclein. J. Fluor. 2010, 20, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zhytniakivska, O.; Tarabara, U.; Kurutos, A.; Vus, K.; Trusova, V.; Gorbenko, G. Interaction of novel monomethine cyanine dyes with proteins in native and amyloid states. East Eur. J. Phys. 2022, 2, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vus, K.; Tarabara, U.; Balklava, Z.; Nerukh, D.; Stich, M.; Laguta, A.; Vodolazkaya, N.; Mchedlov-Petrossyan, N.O.; Farafonov, V.; Kriklya, N.; et al. Association of novel monomethine cyanine dyes with bacteriophage MS2: A fluorescence study. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 302, 112569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mudliar, N.H.; Dongre, P.M.; Singh, P.K. An efficient J-aggregate based fluorescence turn-on and ratiometric sensor for heparin. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 301, 127089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fürstenberg, A.; Julliard, M.D.; Deligeorgiev, T.G.; Gadjev, N.I.; Vasilev, A.A.; Vauthey, E. Ultrafast excited-state dynamics of DNA fluorescent intercalators: New insight into the fluorescence enhancement mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7661–7669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shimizu, M.; Sasaki, S.; Kinjo, M. Triplet fraction buildup effect of the DNA-YOYO complex studied with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 366, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shin, H.-S.; Okamoto, A.; Sako, Y.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Pack, C.-G. Characterization of the triplet state of hybridization-sensitive DNA probe by using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ilina, K.; Henary, M. Cyanine dyes containing quinoline moieties: History, synthesis, optical properties, and applications. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, W.K.W.; Jellett, J.-F.; Dickie, P.M. DNA distributions in planktonic bacteria stained with TOTO or TO-PRO. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1995, 40, 1485–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Marie, D.; Vaulot, D.; Partensky, F. Application of the novel nucleic acid dyes YOYO-1, YO-PRO-1, and PicoGreen for flow cytometric analysis of marine prokaryotes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1649–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lippe, R. Flow virometry: A powerful tool to functionally characterize viruses. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01765-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Higuchi, K.; Sato, Y.; Togashi, N.; Suzuki, M.; Yoshino, Y.; Nishizawa, S. Bright and light-up sensing of benzo[c,d]indole-oxazolopyridine cyanine dye for RNA and its application to highly sensitive imaging of nucleolar RNA in living cells. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 23744–23748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Hilal, H.; Taylor, J.A. Cyanine dyes for the detection of double stranded DNA. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2008, 70, 1104–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Wang, R.-Y.; Gao, X.; Lu, Y.-T. A surfactant enhanced stopped-flow kinetic fluorimetric method for the determination of trace DNA. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 538, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Atanasova, M.; Yordanova, G.; Nenkova, R.; Ivanov, Y.; Godjevargova, T.; Dinev, D. Brewing yeast viability measured using a novel fluorescent dye and image cytometer. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hwang, G.T. Single-labeled oligonucleotides showing fluorescence changes upon hybridization with target nucleic acids. Molecules 2018, 23, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Asseline, U.; Chassignol, M.; Aubert, Y.; Roig, V. Detection of terminal mismatches on DNA duplexes with fluorescent oligonucleotides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 1949–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Koehler, O.; Seitz, O. Thiazole orange as fluorescent universal base in peptide nucleic acids. Chem. Commun. 2003, 23, 2938–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Koehler, O.; Venkatrao, D.; Jarikote, D.V.; Seitz, O. Forced intercalation probes (FIT probes): Thiazole orange as a fluorescent base in peptide nucleic acids for homogeneous single-nucleotide-polymorphism detection. Chem. Bio Chem. 2005, 6, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jarikote, D.V.; Krebs, N.; Tannert, S.; Roder, B.; Seitz, O. Exploring base-pair-specific optical properties of the DNA stain thiazole orange. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bethge, L.; Jarikote, D.V.; Seitz, O. New cyanine dyes as base surrogates in PNA: Forced intercalation probes (FIT-probes) for homogeneous SNP detection. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Van Orden, A.; Keller, R.A.; Patrick Ambrose, W. High-throughput flow cytometric DNA fragment sizing. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ma, Y.; Shortreed, M.R.; Yeung, E.S. High-throughput single-molecule spectroscopy in free solution. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 4640–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ma, Y.; Shortreed, M.R.; Li, H.; Huang, W.; Yeung, E.S. Single-molecule immunoassay and DNA diagnosis. Electrophoresis 2001, 22, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Zarkov, A.; Vasilev, A.; Deligeorgiev, T.; Stoynov, S.; Nedelcheva-Veleva, M. Novel fluorescent dyes for single DNA molecule techniques. Mol. Imaging 2013, 12, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lange, N.; Szlasa, W.; Saczko, J.; Chwiłkowska, A. Potential of cyanine derived dyes in photodynamic therapy. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Guan, M.; Chu, G.; Jin, J.; Liu, C.; Cheng, L.; Guo, Y.; Deng, Z.; Wang, Y. A combined cyanine/carbomer gel enhanced photodynamic antimicrobial activity and wound healing. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General structure of monomethine cyanine dyes (a) with some examples of terminal heterocyclic groups (b); structure of dye 1 (c).
Figure 1. General structure of monomethine cyanine dyes (a) with some examples of terminal heterocyclic groups (b); structure of dye 1 (c).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of the thioalkyl method for the synthesis of MCDs.
Figure 2. Scheme of the thioalkyl method for the synthesis of MCDs.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g002
Figure 3. Scheme of the 2-iminobenzothiazoline method for the synthesis of MCDs.
Figure 3. Scheme of the 2-iminobenzothiazoline method for the synthesis of MCDs.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g003
Figure 4. Scheme of the synthesis of MCDs via a sulfobetaine salt of the N-alkyl heterocycle.
Figure 4. Scheme of the synthesis of MCDs via a sulfobetaine salt of the N-alkyl heterocycle.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g004
Figure 5. Scheme of MCD synthesis via 2- or 4-chloroquinoline derivative.
Figure 5. Scheme of MCD synthesis via 2- or 4-chloroquinoline derivative.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g005
Figure 6. Scheme of the synthesis of unsymmetrical neutral pH-sensitive MCDs.
Figure 6. Scheme of the synthesis of unsymmetrical neutral pH-sensitive MCDs.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g006
Figure 7. New, green and solvent-free synthesis of unsymmetrical MCDs.
Figure 7. New, green and solvent-free synthesis of unsymmetrical MCDs.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g007
Figure 8. Scheme of the synthesis of homodimeric MCDs.
Figure 8. Scheme of the synthesis of homodimeric MCDs.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g008
Figure 9. Structural formulas of symmetrical “simplest” MCDs 2–4. The compound names are given in the text.
Figure 9. Structural formulas of symmetrical “simplest” MCDs 2–4. The compound names are given in the text.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g009
Figure 10. Scheme of potential surfaces of the S0, S1 and T states of dye 2 and nonradiative deactivation of its S1 state (based on [32]).
Figure 10. Scheme of potential surfaces of the S0, S1 and T states of dye 2 and nonradiative deactivation of its S1 state (based on [32]).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g010
Figure 11. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 5–13.
Figure 11. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 5–13.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g011
Figure 12. Conceptual scheme of noncovalent binding of MCDs to double-stranded DNA, illustrating the main types of complexes: (a) binding in the minor groove of the DNA molecule and (b) intercalation between DNA base pairs, using dye 2 (molecules in blue) as an example.
Figure 12. Conceptual scheme of noncovalent binding of MCDs to double-stranded DNA, illustrating the main types of complexes: (a) binding in the minor groove of the DNA molecule and (b) intercalation between DNA base pairs, using dye 2 (molecules in blue) as an example.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g012
Figure 13. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 14–19.
Figure 13. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 14–19.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g013
Figure 14. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 20–26 containing a benzoselenazole heterocycle.
Figure 14. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 20–26 containing a benzoselenazole heterocycle.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g014
Figure 15. Structural formulas of dyes: GCP conjugates of MCDs (27 and 28) and unsymmetrical benz[c,d]indolium-containing MCDs (29–35).
Figure 15. Structural formulas of dyes: GCP conjugates of MCDs (27 and 28) and unsymmetrical benz[c,d]indolium-containing MCDs (29–35).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g015
Figure 16. Structural formulas of fluorinated MCDs (dyes 36–39).
Figure 16. Structural formulas of fluorinated MCDs (dyes 36–39).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g016
Figure 17. Unsymmetrical MCDs 40–46 with different positive charges.
Figure 17. Unsymmetrical MCDs 40–46 with different positive charges.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g017
Figure 18. Structural formulas of different unsymmetrical dicationic dyes 47–50 and dye 51 with an acridine terminal heterocycle.
Figure 18. Structural formulas of different unsymmetrical dicationic dyes 47–50 and dye 51 with an acridine terminal heterocycle.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g018
Figure 19. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 52–57 with different substituents at the N-atom in the pyridinium fragment.
Figure 19. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 52–57 with different substituents at the N-atom in the pyridinium fragment.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g019
Figure 20. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 58–65.
Figure 20. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCDs 58–65.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g020
Figure 21. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCD 66–75.
Figure 21. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical MCD 66–75.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g021
Figure 22. Structural formulas of commercially available MCDs 76–79.
Figure 22. Structural formulas of commercially available MCDs 76–79.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g022
Figure 23. Structural formulas of MCDs 80–89.
Figure 23. Structural formulas of MCDs 80–89.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g023
Figure 24. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical crescent-shaped MCDs (90–92) and dyes based on N-arylpyridocyanine (dyes 93–97).
Figure 24. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical crescent-shaped MCDs (90–92) and dyes based on N-arylpyridocyanine (dyes 93–97).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g024
Figure 25. Structural formulas of dimeric MCDs 98 (TOTO) and 99 (YOYO).
Figure 25. Structural formulas of dimeric MCDs 98 (TOTO) and 99 (YOYO).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g025
Figure 26. Structural formulas of homodimeric (100–104) and trimeric (105) MCDs with various linkers.
Figure 26. Structural formulas of homodimeric (100–104) and trimeric (105) MCDs with various linkers.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g026
Figure 27. Structural formula of MCD 106 and possible structures of H- and J-aggregates of cyanine dyes.
Figure 27. Structural formula of MCD 106 and possible structures of H- and J-aggregates of cyanine dyes.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g027
Figure 28. Structures of canonical and some non-canonical forms of DNA: canonical double helix ds-DNA structure ((a); B-DNA), left-handed DNA helix ((b), Z*-DNA), DNA triple helix (c), and DNA G-quadruplex (d).
Figure 28. Structures of canonical and some non-canonical forms of DNA: canonical double helix ds-DNA structure ((a); B-DNA), left-handed DNA helix ((b), Z*-DNA), DNA triple helix (c), and DNA G-quadruplex (d).
Chemosensors 11 00280 g028
Figure 29. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical monocationic and dicationic MCDs 107–118.
Figure 29. Structural formulas of unsymmetrical monocationic and dicationic MCDs 107–118.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g029
Figure 30. Structural formulas of MCDs 119–126.
Figure 30. Structural formulas of MCDs 119–126.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g030
Figure 31. Structural formulas of MCDs 127–131.
Figure 31. Structural formulas of MCDs 127–131.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g031
Figure 32. Structural formula of the dimeric dye 132.
Figure 32. Structural formula of the dimeric dye 132.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g032
Figure 33. Structural formulas of dyes 133–136.
Figure 33. Structural formulas of dyes 133–136.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g033
Figure 34. Structural formulas of dyes 137–145.
Figure 34. Structural formulas of dyes 137–145.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g034
Figure 35. Structural formulas of dyes 146–152.
Figure 35. Structural formulas of dyes 146–152.
Chemosensors 11 00280 g035
Table 1. Details of the methods of MCD synthesis.
Table 1. Details of the methods of MCD synthesis.
Reaction SchemePrecursor CompoundReagents/Solvents, ConditionsTemperature, TimeReaction YieldRefs.
Figure 2Thioalkyl derivativesDry pyridine or triethylamine in ethanol120 °C68–94%[8]
N-diisopropylethylamine in ethanol or acetic anhydrideRoom temperature34–98%[9]
Trimethylamine in acetonitrile60 °C34–90%[10]
N,N-Diisopropylethylamine in methanol, with diethyl ether addedRoom temperature21–63%[11,12]
Triethylamine, dichloromethaneRoom temperature10–37%[13]
Melting of compounds, then cooling, and ethanol addition100–110 °C (10–15 min)52–95%[14]
Triethylamine, solvent-free, microwave260–320 W, 5–8 min;
200–240 W, 10–12 min 1
75–93%
79–90% 1
[15]
Figure 32-iminobenzo-
thiazoline
Melting of compounds and addition of solvent150–220 °C,
1 h
31–86%[16]
Figure 4Sulfobetaine salt of N-alkyl heterocycleMelting of compounds, then cooling, and addition of methanol100–250 °C, several min65–95%[17]
Methoxyethanol, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone-2, or mix.Cooling, 10–120 min51–95%[17]
Figure 52- or 4-chloroquinoline derivativeMelting of compounds and addition of acetone160 °C, 30 min49–83%[18]
Triethylamine in methanol with addition of KI/H2OCooling, 30 min56–71%[18]
N,N-Diisopropylethylamine in methanolRoom temperature, 2–7 h50–97%[19]
Triethylamine in methanol with addition of KI/H2O.Room temperature, 1–2 h51–93%[20,21]
Figure 63-phenyl-2H-1,4-
benzothiazine and
indole-3-carboxal-
dehyde
12 M HCl/acetonitrile; 1:4 v/v70 °C, 3 h~50%[22]
Figure 7Methyl-pyridinium iodide Grinding of compounds (in the presence of piperidine catalyst) ofRoom temperature, 13 min 90–97%[23]
Figure 8Thiazole orange derivative 12-methoxyethanol, with addition of KI/H2O.15 min–3 h54–93%[25]
Microwave-assisted solvent-free method, in the presence of N,N-dimethylformamide and triethylamine70–120 W, 78–110 min75–90%[26]
2-methoxyethanol2–5 h31–51%[27]
1 For dimeric dyes.
Table 2. Spectral-fluorescent properties of monomeric MCD probes in the absence (f) and in the presence (b) of dsDNA. λabs and λfl are maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra, respectively; Iflf and Iflb are fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of dsDNA, respectively; φflb is the fluorescence quantum yield of the dye bound to DNA; Kb is the constant of dye binding to DNA; τDNA is the fluorescence lifetime in the presence of DNA; and LOQ is the limit of DNA detection (quantification).
Table 2. Spectral-fluorescent properties of monomeric MCD probes in the absence (f) and in the presence (b) of dsDNA. λabs and λfl are maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra, respectively; Iflf and Iflb are fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of dsDNA, respectively; φflb is the fluorescence quantum yield of the dye bound to DNA; Kb is the constant of dye binding to DNA; τDNA is the fluorescence lifetime in the presence of DNA; and LOQ is the limit of DNA detection (quantification).
Dye
No.
ChargeλabsfλabsbλflfλflbIflb/Iflf,
φflb (%)
Kb, τDNA, LOQRefs.
nm
1+150150864052718900Kb = 3.2 × 105 M−1[43,46]
14+1481490575505700, 36%[44,46]
15+1508519544892Kb = 2.3 × 104 M−1[9]
16+15015195451033Kb = 9.8 × 104 M−1
17+1512519543834Kb = 7.9 × 104 M−1
18+2510516547437Kb = 1.27 × 105 M−1
19+1512525545340Kb = 9.8 × 104 M−1
20+14264244954657[11,12]
21+14314335054807
22+142343149146663
23+142743649747059
240405412/43447047411
250406412/4304724865
40+251151553228%LOQ = 70 ng/mL[51]
41+250250852718%
42+251351553226%
43+250650853032%
44+150851652927%
45+15135205360.6
52+1435440483480182[60]
53+1446450483483202
54+1440440485485218
55+1442442485488166
56+1441445479483177
57+1442447485483198
58+140040043342655[63]
59+142242547146285
60+141341346546034
61+143742552049570
62+144644747548595
63+146146551552096[63]
64+145646151151461.4
65+1488495640575150
66+1 440 48719.14Kb = 1.01 × 104 M−1[64]
67+1475630499360[65,66]
68+145254548150
69+147449549920
70+145351848040
71+1474599498250
73+1476500499100
75+14615125155
76+14944985305251500, 69%τDNA = 6.94 ns[73,81]
77+14984805285201000, 64%τDNA = 6.84 ns, Kb = 4.3 × 106 M−1[81]
79+24864945505431000, 66%τDNA = 8.58 ns[74,81]
80+149151118%Kb = 1.4 × 106 M−1[75]
81+1464492100%Kb = 8.5 × 106 M−1
82+148750376%Kb = 4.6 × 106 M−1
88+148851568%Kb = 5.8 × 106 M−1
89+151453514%Kb = 2.3 × 106 M−1
90+244846754249216[79]
91+2482463588487340
92+2487516590561130
93+15105325355461600τDNA = 0.62 ns[80]
94+15125365375532500τDNA = 0.86 ns
95+15205525926003900τDNA = 1.5 ns
96+15245616056121700
Table 3. Spectral-fluorescent properties of homodimeric MCD probes in the absence (f) and in the presence (b) of dsDNA. λabs and λfl are maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra, respectively; Iflf and Iflb are fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of dsDNA, respectively, Ifl = Iflb – Iflf; Kb is the constant of dye binding to DNA; τDNA is the fluorescence lifetime in the presence of DNA; and LOD is the limit of DNA detection.
Table 3. Spectral-fluorescent properties of homodimeric MCD probes in the absence (f) and in the presence (b) of dsDNA. λabs and λfl are maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra, respectively; Iflf and Iflb are fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of dsDNA, respectively, Ifl = Iflb – Iflf; Kb is the constant of dye binding to DNA; τDNA is the fluorescence lifetime in the presence of DNA; and LOD is the limit of DNA detection.
Dye
No.
ChargeλabsfλabsbλflfλflbIflb/Iflf,
Ifl (a.u.)
Kb, τDNA, LODRefs.
nm
98+44815135331400τDNA = 1.96 ns, LOD ~ 4 pg/mL (gel) [42,46,82]
99+44884895495093200Kb = 3.9 × 106 M−1, τDNA = 2.3 ns, LOD ~1.7 ng/mL (sol.) [42,81,82,87,88,89]
100+4478, 509488, 525548157 a.u.Kb = 9.8 × 105 M−1[27]
101+4484, 511494, 525538386 a.u.Kb = 2.3 × 106 M−1
102+4478, 521490, 525550340 a.u.Kb = 4.5 × 106 M−1
103+4486, 523490, 525538216 a.u.Kb = 1.05 × 106 M−1
104+2452482482775[92]
105+34524824821542
Table 4. Spectral-fluorescent properties of MCD probes in the absence (f) and in the presence (b) of RNA. λabs and λfl are maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra, respectively; Iflf and Iflb are fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of RNA, respectively; φflb is the fluorescence quantum yield of the dye bound to RNA; and Kb is the constant of dye binding to RNA.
Table 4. Spectral-fluorescent properties of MCD probes in the absence (f) and in the presence (b) of RNA. λabs and λfl are maxima of the absorption and fluorescence spectra, respectively; Iflf and Iflb are fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of RNA, respectively; φflb is the fluorescence quantum yield of the dye bound to RNA; and Kb is the constant of dye binding to RNA.
Dye
No.
ChargeλabsfλabsbλflfλflbIflb/Iflf, Kb,
φflb (%)
Refs.
nm
40+2511646[51]
41+2502633
42+2513652
43+2506596
44+1508534
45+1513570
52+1435440482482255[60]
53+1446449483485145
54+1440440485488155
55+1442439485485134
56+1441445479483130
57+1442447485483143
64+1462468524506180[106]
75+1461512495[66]
107+1580624645105, Kb = 1.25 × 106 M−1[104,105]
108+2600666350, Kb = 2.8 × 103 M−1[105]
109+1595665230, Kb = 4.8 × 103 M−1
110+2480489515511306[106]
111+2465506608529402
112+1468504564526479
113+1434451469476128
116+351451854954775[107]
117+35225245755478
118+352052355855470
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pronkin, P.G.; Tatikolov, A.S. Fluorescent Probes for Biomacromolecules Based on Monomethine Cyanine Dyes. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11050280

AMA Style

Pronkin PG, Tatikolov AS. Fluorescent Probes for Biomacromolecules Based on Monomethine Cyanine Dyes. Chemosensors. 2023; 11(5):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11050280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pronkin, Pavel G., and Alexander S. Tatikolov. 2023. "Fluorescent Probes for Biomacromolecules Based on Monomethine Cyanine Dyes" Chemosensors 11, no. 5: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11050280

APA Style

Pronkin, P. G., & Tatikolov, A. S. (2023). Fluorescent Probes for Biomacromolecules Based on Monomethine Cyanine Dyes. Chemosensors, 11(5), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11050280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop