Next Article in Journal
Au-Coated ZnO Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Substrates: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications in Exosome Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of Xylene Using Ni(OH)2-Enhanced Co3O4 Nanoplate via p–n Junctions
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of WO3 and BiVO4 Photoanodes for Photoelectrochemical Sensing of Xylene, Toluene and Methanol
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Performance MEMS Oxygen Sensors Based on Au/TiO2 Films
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Chemical Sensors for Volatile Organic Compound Detection

1
College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Hebei Key Laboratory of Micro-Nano Precision Optical Sensing and Measurement Technology, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
3
National Frontiers Science Center for Industrial Intelligence and Systems Optimization, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
4
Key Laboratory of Data Analytics and Optimization for Smart Industry (Northeastern University), Ministry of Education, Shenyang 110819, China
5
College of Chemical Engineering, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2023, 11(11), 553; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11110553
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Accepted: 1 November 2023 / Published: 3 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Sensors for Volatile Organic Compound Detection)
The detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is in high demand in various fields, such as environmental pollution monitoring, early disease screening, and food freshness assessment [1,2,3]. A variety of methods, including spectroscopic analysis [4], mass spectrometry [5], chromatographic analysis [6], electrochemical gas sensors [7], infrared gas sensors [8,9], and semiconductor gas sensors [10,11,12], have been extensively used for VOC detection. This is especially the case for semiconductor sensors thanks to their high sensitivity, fast response time, and cost-effectiveness [13,14,15].
Under the unremitting efforts of researchers, the research of semiconductor gas sensors has made a major breakthrough. There have been advanced research results with high sensitivity [16,17,18,19], a low minimum detection limit [20,21,22,23], room temperature sensing [24,25,26,27], and other advanced properties. Li et al. prepared s-Nb2O5 @ SnO2 composite, and its response to 500 ppb acetone at 250 °C was 37 [28]. Xiao et al. prepared TiO2 NCs-implanted LaFeO3 nanomaterials, and its response to 100 ppm formaldehyde was 221.8 [29]. Hu et al. prepared Au-functionalized MoO3 nanoribbons, which realized the detection of formaldehyde at room temperature [30]. Compared with toluene, ethanol, methanol, and acetone, the sensitivity to formaldehyde is one to two orders of magnitude higher. Li et al. realized the identification of VOC gas at room temperature by using an ultraviolet light regulation method [31].
However, there are still problems to be solved from the perspective of large-scale commercial applications. Firstly, the low temperature response speed of the sensor needs to be improved. Sensors can detect the target gas at room temperature, thus reducing the explosion risk and power consumption. However, their response to the target gas is relatively slow, and the response curve cannot completely recover to the response baseline or is slow after the response. Secondly, the selectivity of semiconductor sensors has not been fundamentally improved. The sensitivity difference between target gas and non-target gas is increased by adjusting the material structure. Thirdly, the practical application ability of the sensor needs further verification. Most research papers only focus on the laboratory stage, and the related gas sensing performance research needs to be carried out with the help of high-purity air and high-precision instruments.
In view of the above difficulties, this Special Issue presents a comprehensive and detailed exploration of the latest achievements in VOC detection based on chemical sensors. Modifying sensitive materials is a practical approach to enhance the gas-sensing performance of semiconductor metal oxide sensors. Li et al. synthesized nickel-doped ZnO-sensitive materials with core–shell structures, doped at ratios of 0.5%, 1%, and 2%, which achieved the rapid detection of toluene [32]. Based on a doping ratio of 1%, the sensors exhibited a response of up to 210 for 100 ppm toluene, with a detection limit as low as 0.5 ppm. Research indicates a significant enhancement in sensor performance through the combined action of a narrower bandgap, higher specific surface area, and ion catalysis. San et al. designed a series of three-dimensional rGO-functionalized flower-shaped In2O3 structures, enabling the low-temperature and rapid detection of acetone. The working temperature of 150 °C and a fast response time of 3 s can be attributed to the introduction of an appropriate amount of graphene [33]. Scholars have tried to achieve breakthroughs in detection methods, data analysis, and sensor system design, aiming to further enhance the capability of detecting VOCs in real-world application scenarios. In terms of detection methods, Wang et al. synthesized Pt/Ti3C2Tx-CNT and employed cataluminescence technology to achieve the non-invasive and rapid detection of the lung cancer biomarker toluene at lower operating temperatures [34]. Regarding the construction of physical systems, Shen et al. developed a wireless luminescent sensor system with excellent luminescent characteristics, featuring high visible light intensity and a high signal-to-noise ratio [35]. Zhang et al. completed a comprehensive review of the detection of triethylamine using chemical sensors [36]. This paper commences with the fundamental characteristics of sensors and typical sensing mechanisms, providing a comprehensive summary of the latest advancements in enhancing the sensing performance of triethylamine sensors from various perspectives. It serves as a detailed entry point for readers interested in exploring VOC detection.
I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to all the authors, reviewers, and editors of this Special Issue, who have enriched its content and contributed to advancing the field of combustible volatile organic compound detection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bari, M.A.; Kindzierski, W.B. Ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Calgary, Alberta: Sources and Screening Health Risk Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.; Chai, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Ning, P.; Huang, J.; Tian, S. Interaction of Inhalable Volatile Organic Compounds and Pulmonary Surfactant: Potential Hazards of VOCs Exposure to Lung. J. Hazard Mater. 2019, 369, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gong, Y.; Wei, Y.; Cheng, J.; Jiang, T.; Chen, L.; Xu, B. Health Risk Assessment and Personal Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Metro Carriages-A Case Study in Shanghai. China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 1432–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, C.; Scherrer, S.; Hossain, D. Measurements of Cavity Ring Down Spectroscopy of Acetone in the Ultraviolet and Near-infrared Spectral Regions: Potential for Development of a Breath Analyzer. Appl. Spectrosc. 2004, 58, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Han, B.; Chen, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhou, T.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, J. Development of an Impurity-profiling Method for Source Identification of Spilled Benzene Series Compounds by Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry: Toluene as a Case Study. J. Sep. Sci. 2015, 38, 3198–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Oliveira, D.P.; De Siqueira, M.E.P.B. A Simple and Rapid Method for Urinary Acetone Analysis by Headspace/gas Chromatography. Quim. Nova 2007, 30, 1362–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hao, X.; Wu, D.; Wang, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, T.; Liang, X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F.; Yan, X.; et al. Gas sniffer (YSZ-based electrochemical gas phase sensor) toward Acetone Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 278, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dinh, T.-V.; Choi, I.-Y.; Son, Y.-S.; Kim, J.-C. A review on Non-dispersive Infrared Gas Sensors: Improvement of Sensor Detection Limit and Interference Correction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 231, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Jin, H.; Jin, Q.; Shen, W.; Zou, J.; Deng, S.; Cheung, W.; Kam, W.; et al. Light-Regulated Electrochemical Reaction Assisted Core-Shell Heterostructure for Detecting Specific Volatile Markers with Controllable Sensitivity and Selectivity. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fergus, J.W. Perovskite Oxides for Semiconductor-based Gas Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 123, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, W.Y.; Jiang, X.; Lai, S.N.; Peroulis, D.; Stanciu, L. Nanohybrids of a MXene and Transition Metal Dichalcogenide for Selective Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cho, I.; Sim, Y.C.; Cho, M.; Cho, Y.H.; Park, I. Monolithic Micro Light-Emitting Diode/Metal Oxide Nanowire Gas Sensor with Microwatt-Level Power Consumption. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Dong, D.; Yao, G.; Wei, G.; He, A.; Wu, H.; Zhu, H.; Huang, Z.; Tang, Z. E-nose based on a high-integrated and low-power metal oxide gas sensor array. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 380, 133289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ji, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Yuan, Z.; Meng, F. Detection and Recognition of Toluene and Butanone in Mixture based on SnO2 Sensor via Dynamic Transient and Steady-state Response Analysis in Jump Heating Voltage Mode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 376, 132969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ji, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, Z.; Meng, F. Interference Suppression Strategies for Trace Minor Component of Semiconductor Gas Sensor based on Temperature Modulation Mode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 388, 133874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Yao, S.; Yang, Q.; Sun, P.; Gao, Y.; Liang, X.; Liu, F.; Lu, G. Highly Sensitive and Humidity-independent Ethanol Sensors based on In2O3 Nanoflower/SnO2 Nanoparticle Composites. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 52252–52258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, B.; Li, M.; Meng, F.; Liu, J. Highly Sensitive Ethylene Sensors using Pd Nanoparticles and rGO Modified Flower-like Hierarchical Porous α-Fe2O3. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 290, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, K.M.; Ma, S.Y. Preparations of Bi-doped SnO2 Hierarchical Flower-shaped Nanostructures with Highly Sensitive HCHO Sensing Properties. Mater. Lett. 2019, 236, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Korotcenkov, G.; Cho, B.K. Engineering Approaches for the Improvement of Conductometric Gas Sensor Parameters. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 188, 709–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuan, H.; Aljneibi, S.A.A.A.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Fang, J.; Tang, C.; Yan, X.; Cai, H.; Gu, Y.; et al. ZnO Nanosheets Abundant in Oxygen Vacancies Derived from Metal-Organic Frameworks for ppb-Level Gas Sensing. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1807161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suematsu, K.; Harano, W.; Oyama, T.; Shin, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Shimanoe, K. Pulse-Driven Semiconductor Gas Sensors Toward ppt Level Toluene Detection. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 11219–11223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jo, Y.K.; Jeong, S.Y.; Moon, Y.K.; Jo, Y.M.; Yoon, J.W.; Lee, J.H. Exclusive and Ultrasensitive Detection of Formaldehyde at Room Temperature Using a Flexible and Monolithic Chemiresistive Sensor. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, M.; Ji, J.; Song, P.; Liu, M.; Wang, Q. α-Fe2O3 Nanocubes/Ti3C2Tx MXene Composites for Improvement of Acetone Sensing Performance at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 349, 130782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Song, P.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. Flexible MXene/rGO/CuO Hybrid Aerogels for High Performance Acetone Sensing at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 340, 129946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.Y.; Gao, N.; Tian, Z.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, B.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. MoS2 Nanosheets Sensitized with Quantum Dots for Room-Temperature Gas Sensors. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Z.; Li, H.; Wu, Z.; Wang, M.; Luo, J.; Torun, H.; Hu, P.; Yang, C. Advances in Designs and Mechanisms of Semiconducting Metal Oxide Nanostructures for High-precision Gas Sensors Operated at Room Temperature. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 470–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Neri, G.; Pinna, N. Nanostructured Materials for Room-Temperature Gas Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2015, 28, 795–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; Kim, K.; Fuchigami, T.; Asaka, T.; Kakimoto, K.; Masuda, Y. Acetone Gas Sensor Based on Nb2O5@SnO2 hybrid Structure with High Selectivity and Ppt-level Sensitivity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 393, 134144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, C.; Tang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Gao, X.; Wang, H.; Jia, L. High Performance Porous LaFeO3 Gas Sensor with Embedded p-n Junctions Enabling Ppb-level Formaldehyde Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 397, 134670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Z.; Tan, L.; Fu, X.; Fan, Y.; Sun, M.; Zhou, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Xu, S.; Gu, H. Au-functionalized MoO3 Nanoribbons Towards Rapid and Selective Formaldehyde Gas Sensing at Room Temperature. Results Phys. 2023, 49, 106525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, M.; Chang, J.; Deng, Z.; Mi, L.; Kumar, M.; Wang, S.; He, Y.; Meng, G. Discriminating Gas Molecules at Room Temperature by UV Light Modulation (ULM) of Nonselective Metal Oxide Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 378, 133115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Z.H.; Li, S.J.; Song, Z.J.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhang, H.; Guo, L.L.; Sun, C.X.; Liu, H.Y.; Shao, J.K.; et al. Influence of Nickel Doping on Ultrahigh Toluene Sensing Performance of Core-Shell ZnO Microsphere Gas Sensor. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. San, X.G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.S.; Meng, D.; Cui, J.; Jin, Q. One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of 3D Interconnected rGO/In2O3 Heterojunction Structures for Enhanced Acetone Detection. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, H.Y.; Shi, X.Q.; Liu, F.; Duan, T.M.; Sun, B. Non-Invasive Rapid Detection of Lung Cancer Biomarker Toluene with a Cataluminescence Sensor Based on the Two-Dimensional Nanocomposite Pt/Ti3C2Tx-CNT. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shen, X.Y.; Shi, G.L.; Zhang, Y.X.; Weng, S.Z. Wireless Volatile Organic Compound Detection for Restricted Internet of Things Environments Based on Cataluminescence Sensors. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, H.; Guo, Y.H.; Meng, F.L. Metal Oxide Semiconductor Sensors for Triethylamine Detection: Sensing Performance and Improvements. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, F.; Yuan, Z.; Meng, D. Chemical Sensors for Volatile Organic Compound Detection. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11110553

AMA Style

Meng F, Yuan Z, Meng D. Chemical Sensors for Volatile Organic Compound Detection. Chemosensors. 2023; 11(11):553. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11110553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Fanli, Zhenyu Yuan, and Dan Meng. 2023. "Chemical Sensors for Volatile Organic Compound Detection" Chemosensors 11, no. 11: 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11110553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop