Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- Supplementary File 1:
ZIP-Document (ZIP, 2863 KiB)
Stuby, L.; Jampen, L.; Sierro, J.; Paus, E.; Spichiger, T.; Suppan, L.; Thurre, D. Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare 2021, 9, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030354
Stuby L, Jampen L, Sierro J, Paus E, Spichiger T, Suppan L, Thurre D. Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare. 2021; 9(3):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030354
Chicago/Turabian StyleStuby, Loric, Laurent Jampen, Julien Sierro, Erik Paus, Thierry Spichiger, Laurent Suppan, and David Thurre. 2021. "Effect on Chest Compression Fraction of Continuous Manual Compressions with Asynchronous Ventilations Using an i-gel® versus 30:2 Approach during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Manikin Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial" Healthcare 9, no. 3: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030354