Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of the Communities Geriatric Mild Cognitive Impairment Risk Calculator (CGMCI-Risk)
Previous Article in Journal
Patients with Non-Specific Complaints in Emergency Departments: A Growing Patient Safety Concern in an Aging Population with Multimorbidity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Core Legal Challenges for Medical 3D Printing in the EU
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Leadership and Management on the Implementation of Electronic Health Record Systems in the Primary Healthcare Centers

by
Haitham Alzghaibi
1,* and
Hayley A. Hutchings
2
1
Department of Health Informatics, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
2
Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(20), 2013; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202013
Submission received: 23 May 2024 / Revised: 30 August 2024 / Accepted: 1 September 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024

Abstract

Background: In the last three decades, Electronic Health Records Systems (EHRSs) have become one of the top priorities of policymakers globally. Nowadays, EHRS reform is fast becoming a priority in developed countries. The introduction of EHRSs in Saudi healthcare organizations is considered one of the highest priorities of policymakers. Saudi Arabian e-health strategy pays reasonable attention to the EHRS implementation project. According to Saudi Vision 2030, the e-health transformation will be on top of IT projects in the country. However, an estimated 50% of EHRS implementations have failed. Project leadership and type of project management have been found to be crucial components of effective EHRS implementation. Aim of the study: To evaluate the role of centralized project management (CPM) in the implementation of large-scale EHRSs in Primary Healthcare Centers (PHCs) in Saudi Arabia (SA). Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach involving a survey and semi-structured qualitative interview methods were utilized. Results: A total of 39 (75%) out of 53 policymakers at the Saudi Ministry of Health completed the survey, and 14 project team members were interviewed. Findings from both illustrated that adopting centralized project management approaches to implementation was beneficial in facilitating large-scale EHRS implementation and helped to overcome barriers that may have otherwise led to the failure of the project. EHRS interoperability and software selection were the factors that CPM influenced most positively.
Keywords: electronic health record; primary healthcare centers; centralized project management; large-scale projects; IT implementation; leadership; project management electronic health record; primary healthcare centers; centralized project management; large-scale projects; IT implementation; leadership; project management

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alzghaibi, H.; Hutchings, H.A. The Impact of Leadership and Management on the Implementation of Electronic Health Record Systems in the Primary Healthcare Centers. Healthcare 2024, 12, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202013

AMA Style

Alzghaibi H, Hutchings HA. The Impact of Leadership and Management on the Implementation of Electronic Health Record Systems in the Primary Healthcare Centers. Healthcare. 2024; 12(20):2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alzghaibi, Haitham, and Hayley A. Hutchings. 2024. "The Impact of Leadership and Management on the Implementation of Electronic Health Record Systems in the Primary Healthcare Centers" Healthcare 12, no. 20: 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202013

APA Style

Alzghaibi, H., & Hutchings, H. A. (2024). The Impact of Leadership and Management on the Implementation of Electronic Health Record Systems in the Primary Healthcare Centers. Healthcare, 12(20), 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop