Next Article in Journal
Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score as a Mortality Predictor in Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Urban Spillover, Health Disparities, and Community Strengths in Small Towns in Central Texas
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding the Associations between Executive Function and Psychological Variables in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Network Analysis Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry

1
John Sealy School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
2
Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(16), 1679; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161679
Submission received: 12 June 2024 / Revised: 30 July 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 22 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Health Disparities in the Global Population)

Abstract

The collaborative care model (CCM) was created to improve the delivery of mental health care and is reported to improve access, enhance treatment outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs. To understand the impacts of the CCM on symptom management, diverse populations, and sustainability in healthcare systems, a systematic review was conducted. Several databases were searched for articles assessing the CCM. The inclusion criteria limited the studies to those (1) published between January 2008 and January 2024; (2) written in the English language; (3) analyzing adult patients; (4) analyzing symptom improvement in major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder; and (5) fitting the given definition of a CCM. We identified 9743 articles. Due to missing information or duplication, 4702 were excluded. The remaining articles were screened, yielding 468 articles for full-text analysis, of which 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these articles, five primarily focused on individual patient outcomes, five focused on specific populations, and six reviewed system impacts; eleven articles studied US populations and five studied international populations. An analysis revealed that in 12 of the final articles, the CCM led to a statistically significant improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms with viable implementation and sustainability strategies. The CCM is an effective method for improving patient symptoms and can be potentially affordable in healthcare systems.
Keywords: collaborative care model; anxiety; depression; PTSD; cost-effective; sustainable collaborative care model; anxiety; depression; PTSD; cost-effective; sustainable

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernandez, V.; Nasser, L.; Do, C.; Lee, W.-C. Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry. Healthcare 2024, 12, 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161679

AMA Style

Hernandez V, Nasser L, Do C, Lee W-C. Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry. Healthcare. 2024; 12(16):1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernandez, Veronica, Lucy Nasser, Candice Do, and Wei-Chen Lee. 2024. "Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry" Healthcare 12, no. 16: 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161679

APA Style

Hernandez, V., Nasser, L., Do, C., & Lee, W.-C. (2024). Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry. Healthcare, 12(16), 1679. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop