1. Introduction
The adrenal cortex naturally produces corticosteroids, which have a variety of functions in the body [
1,
2]. Corticosteroids are categorized into two main classes according to their functions: mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids [
1,
2]. Corticosteroids are among the most effective commonly used treatments for diverse autoimmune and inflammatory disorders [
3]. These conditions include multiple sclerosis (MS); inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (like ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease); painful and inflamed joints, tendons, and muscles; polymyalgia rheumatica; giant cell arteritis; urticaria (hives); hay fever; allergic rhinitis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); asthma; lupus; and atopic eczema [
2].
Over time, it has become more evident that patients and physicians are misusing corticosteroids. In a previous study conducted in India, it was observed that a significant proportion of patients, specifically 88.9%, utilized potent and highly potent corticosteroid preparations based on recommendations from pharmacists, paramedical personnel, friends, and relatives [
4]. Topical corticosteroids were recommended by physicians or dermatologists to only a limited number of individuals [
4]. The primary motivation for using topical corticosteroids in 50.4% of patients, in the absence of any underlying dermatological condition, was to achieve skin lightening [
4]. An additional 25.9% of patients used topical corticosteroids as a therapeutic intervention for the management of melasma and suntan [
4]. Furthermore, dermatologists and general practitioners are increasingly prescribing corticosteroids to treat many illnesses, including melasma, urticarial, and undiagnosed skin rashes [
5]. Due to the notable therapeutic effects of corticosteroids, physicians frequently prescribe them as a standard practice in order to attract patients to their clinics [
6]. This practice typically entails the inappropriate utilization of corticosteroids for medical conditions when their use is not warranted [
7].
A previous study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) examined knowledge, attitude, and practice of the proper use of different dosage forms of corticosteroids among corticosteroids users and found poor knowledge, attitude, and practice results among different UAE patients using different corticosteroid dosage forms [
8]. The utilization of corticosteroids may carry potential risks, varying from mild adverse drug reactions to more severe concerns, like immunosuppression and cardiovascular diseases [
3,
9]. These substantial health hazards are primarily associated with the prolonged systemic administration of elevated doses [
3].
The degree of knowledge among patients is positively associated with optimal safety and clinical results. Accordingly, assessing the public comprehension of drugs and their proper usage is typically crucial for attaining the best therapeutic effect [
10,
11]. There is a shortage of population-based studies investigating attitudes and knowledge related to corticosteroids. These studies are notably restricted by their focus on specific dosage forms and small sample sizes [
12]. In addition, another significant limitation arises from their exclusive concentration on particular demographic groups, like particular patient cohorts [
13,
14], caretakers [
15,
16,
17,
18], and/or healthcare professionals [
19].
Given that corticosteroids are readily available and cost-effective treatment choices in developed nations, it is essential to assess the general awareness of these medications in such countries [
20]. Thus, our study aimed to comprehensively assess levels of public awareness concerning corticosteroid use, side effects, and predictors of its use. We targeted both users and non-users in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
4. Discussion
In this cross-sectional study, we assessed levels of awareness about corticosteroid use and associated side effects among users and non-users within our study population. The results of our research highlight significant points about knowledge and perceptions of corticosteroid use in a healthcare context.
The choice of corticosteroid administration method mainly depends on the treated condition. Corticosteroids can be administered through various routes, including oral, topical, intravenous, intramuscular, intraarticular, inhaled, etc. [
22]. Allergies, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis, and many other disorders are all treated with corticosteroid medications [
3,
23]. Our study found that the most frequently reported methods of corticosteroid administration among the participants were oral ingestion, topical application, and intravenous injection, accounting for 59.7%, 49.9%, and 43.6%, respectively. In addition, the most commonly reported indications for corticosteroid treatment were asthma, rheumatoid disease, and severe allergy, accounting for 49.6%, 47.4%, and 41.5%, respectively. These findings imply that study participants have a good knowledge of corticosteroid administration methods and common indications for administering corticosteroids. This awareness may be due to the participants’ educational level, with 60.9% holding bachelor’s degrees and 9.3% having completed higher education. In line with our findings, asthma was documented as the primary reason for oral corticosteroid administration, constituting 39.2% of cases in a previous hospital-based study [
24]. Another prior study also found that the most commonly reported reason for oral corticosteroid administration was respiratory disease (40%) [
25].
The awareness and knowledge of corticosteroids have been evaluated in numerous prior studies [
26,
27,
28]. Aligning with our research findings, a nationwide survey conducted in South Korea identified a notable prevalence of incorrect responses related to the application methods and indications of corticosteroids in certain aspects. Nevertheless, respondents demonstrated satisfactory overall knowledge [
27]. A prior multinational study also documented that participants have adequate knowledge about corticosteroid usage [
29]. In India, there was a notable lack of awareness and knowledge concerning steroids, with approximately 83% of participants lacking familiarity with steroids and steroid-related information [
28].
The most frequent adverse effects of corticosteroid administrations include Cushingoid features, cataracts and glaucoma, myopathy, dermatologic and gastrointestinal adverse effects, hyperglycemia and diabetes, immunosuppression, psychiatric disturbances, fractures, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis suppression [
2,
3]. When our study participants were asked about corticosteroid treatment side effects, the most commonly reported side effects were weight gain, skin changes (e.g., bruising, tender skin, stretch marks, and redness of the face), and fluid accumulation in the body with difficulty breathing, accounting for 44.4%, 30.3%, and 27.7%, respectively. These findings indicate that participants are aware of potential corticosteroid side effects. It is positive that participants are aware of these side effects, as they can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life. However, it is crucial to investigate whether this awareness influences treatment adherence and whether patients consult their healthcare providers about these concerns. In line with our results, a previous study was carried out to assess dentistry students’ knowledge concerning corticosteroids’ adverse effects. The findings indicated that most of these students demonstrated awareness of adverse effects [
30].
In contrast to our results, a previous study revealed that King Fahad Specialist Hospital attendees demonstrated a limited understanding of the side effects associated with using corticosteroids. Furthermore, within this group, those who used corticosteroids were more informed about these side effects compared to non-users, and it was noted that the occurrence of the disease contributed to heightened awareness of these side effects [
31]. Similarly, a prior multinational study also identified a low level of awareness among participants regarding corticosteroid side effects [
29]. Likewise, comparable results were reported by a previous nationwide survey conducted in South Korea concerning the general public’s awareness of topical corticosteroids [
27]. The apprehension of experiencing adverse effects represents a significant obstacle to steroid utilization. Consequently, healthcare providers play an essential role in counseling patients effectively about the proper application of corticosteroids, thus preventing the abuse, hesitation, and misuse of these medications.
Around one-quarter of our study participants (27.6%) reported prior corticosteroid treatment, with 41.1% of them indicating that they received information, either verbally or in writing, from their doctors regarding the potential side effects of corticosteroids treatment. Additionally, a previous investigation revealed that approximately 31.6% of the study participants had reported prior usage of corticosteroids, personally or by friends or family [
29]. Within this subgroup of individuals who had previously used corticosteroids, a significant preponderance (36.7%) had utilized corticosteroid medications for a duration of fewer than seven days [
29]. These findings highlight the crucial role of healthcare practitioners in educating individuals about the potential risks associated with corticosteroid use. The importance of improving communication between patients and healthcare providers becomes evident when considering that a notable proportion of corticosteroid users did not receive this information from their doctors. Therefore, to enhance the quality of care and ensure patient safety, it is necessary to ensure that all corticosteroid users are well-informed about the possible adverse effects.
In our study, among those using corticosteroids, the most commonly reported side effects were weight gain, mood changes, and skin changes (e.g., bruising, thinning skin, stretch marks), accounting for 38.1%, 25.7%, and 21.8%, respectively. These results are consistent with the documented side effects of corticosteroid use, as mentioned before. Again, recognizing common side effects among users highlighted the relevance of healthcare providers’ roles in informing patients about the potential adverse effects of corticosteroid medication and the need for continued monitoring and support to manage these side effects properly. Consistent with our results, participants reported multiple side effects in a previous study. The most common was heightened appetite, resulting in weight gain, in 45% of respondents. Mood alterations, mood swings, and depression followed closely behind, affecting 34.1% of individuals. Additionally, 27.8% of the individuals who utilized corticosteroids reported experiencing acne, and 26.1% had easily bruised, thin skin [
29].
In our study, the most commonly reported sources of information regarding corticosteroid treatment were friends and family, healthcare providers, and social media, accounting for 45.5%, 38.8%, and 28.8%, respectively. While healthcare providers emerge as trusted sources, the reliance on friends and family underscores the influence of personal networks in obtaining knowledge about corticosteroids. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that information obtained from friends and family may not always be accurate. Furthermore, the impact of social media raises concerns about the potential for misinformation [
32,
33]. These observations highlight the necessity for a comprehensive strategy, which includes educating healthcare professionals, promoting responsible engagement on social media platforms, and empowering individuals to critically evaluate corticosteroid-related information from diverse sources. Ultimately, such measures will contribute to a better understanding of corticosteroid therapy. In line with our findings, a prior study observed that individuals more frequently depend on friends and family for information in comparison to consulting physicians or pharmacists [
27]. While friends and family may have some degree of proficient knowledge, they typically lack formal healthcare training, raising concerns about the potential for medication misuse or overuse [
34]. On the contrary, earlier studies have indicated that physicians or pharmacists tend to be the primary sources of medication information within interpersonal networks [
34,
35,
36,
37]. Moreover, an earlier study revealed that social media sites were the primary source of information regarding corticosteroids for most of the participants [
29].
In our study, corticosteroid use was more prevalent among participants aged 41–50 years and unemployed compared to others (
p < 0.05). Conversely, males and individuals with low educational attainment (intermediate school or lower) were less likely to use corticosteroids compared to others (
p < 0.05). These findings highlight the significance of considering variables such as age, employment status, gender, and educational background when investigating corticosteroid utilization patterns, indicating the necessity of specialized healthcare interventions and educational programs catered to various demographic groups to promote proper corticosteroid usage. A prior study demonstrated that the implementation of an educational module on corticosteroids led to a substantial increase in knowledge among participants [
28].
The higher likelihood of using corticosteroid among participants aged 41–50 and unemployed may indicate that this demographic is more susceptible to medical conditions necessitating corticosteroid therapy. Furthermore, this finding suggests that improving access to medical care among this group could help reduce steroid phobia and ultimately increase corticosteroid usage among other patient groups who might need it for their health conditions. In a similar context, a prior study revealed that individuals experiencing long-term unemployment face a significantly higher health burden when compared to both employed individuals and those with shorter periods of unemployment [
38]. This previous study confirmed a direct correlation between the duration of unemployment and the increased disease burden. A previous meta-analysis indicated that individuals without employment have approximately 30% more potential to utilize healthcare services [
39].
A previous study reported a significant negative association between developing corticophobia and the participants’ knowledge and educational levels [
29]. Health consequences are widely recognized to be significantly associated with sociodemographic factors, particularly educational level [
40,
41,
42]. These may explain the lower probability of corticosteroid use among males and individuals with lower education levels among our study participants. Moreover, a prior study revealed that when analyzing the association between demographic data and awareness scores, it was observed that females scored higher in awareness, with a score of 53%, compared to males, who had an awareness score of 33% [
43].
This study has limitations. The cross-sectional study design restricted our ability to examine causality between study variables. The generalizability of our study findings might have been affected as our study population was restricted to Riyadh city. In Riyadh, similar to several major cities, it is not atypical to observe a somewhat greater proportion of young people and professionals in comparison to other regions within the kingdom. The gender distribution of Riyadh may be subject to impact from the substantial expatriate community, particularly in industries such as construction and services, where male expats are frequently employed. Riyadh, being the capital and a prominent commercial hub, has a greater degree of cosmopolitanism and population diversity. The location draws individuals from several places within Saudi Arabia, as well as from numerous nations, seeking employment and entrepreneurial prospects.