Next Article in Journal
Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia in Patients with Special Needs Provided by Private and Public Healthcare Services—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Sociodemographic Characteristics on Coping Strategies Used by Nurses Working at COVID and Non-COVID Hospital Departments during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Psychometric Analysis of the Nurse Satisfaction with the Quality of Care Scale

Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1145; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061145
by Bayan Alilyyani 1,*, Michael Kerr 2, Carol Wong 2 and Dhuha Wazqar 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1145; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061145
Submission received: 4 June 2022 / Revised: 17 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nursing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript, an interesting and worthwhile paper for publication. The following are my comments:

Line 36 - re consider this sentence and how you are incorporating community into this sentence. There needs to be a comma after skills.

Line 83 - work do you mean by the term poor work environment needs further explaining

Line 91 - Be careful when commencing a new paragraph with As mentioned before you need to restate what you are going to discuss in this paragraph, be more specific. 

Line 114 - please re word and critically consider methodology as quantitative and method as to how you generated the data.

Line 164 - you need to use the word eg nine/five up to nine and then you can use the numerical 10 onwards

Hope this is helpful

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

 

The authors attempted to construct The Nurse Satisfaction with The 2 Quality of Care Scale. I find their work crowned with success. The newly developed tools may contribute to the improvement of the quality of medical care as well as the satisfaction with the work of the nursing staff. I rate the article submitted for review very highly. With the constructed tool, the authors filled the gap that had so far been the subject of this research. Below are some of my comments for the authors to consider.

 

Both in the introduction and in the discussion, one could also refer to the following articles:

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030518

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127244

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063620

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063483

 

 

Are there any studies showing a relationship between the subjective perception of quality of care and work engagment? (Thus, nurse satisfaction with the quality of care 66 may be a proxy measure of the actual quality of nursing care delivered [8].)

 

2.3. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Can the authors give an approximate percentage of nurses who speak English in the general population?

 

Do the authors believe that the scale can only have 4 items? the correlation between the third and fourth question is very large. Additionally, The Scree Plot shows little gain between 4 and 5

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop