Forecasting U.S. Aggregate Stock Market Excess Return: Do Functional Data Analysis Add Economic Value?
2. Excess Return Forecast Models
2.1. Functional Data Methodology and Nonparametric Estimation
2.2. Predictive Regressions
3. Data and Results
3.1. Data and Traditional Predictors
- Dividend-price ratio (DP): the difference between the log of a twelve-month moving sum of dividends paid on the S&P500 index and the log of stock prices.
- Dividend yield (DY): the difference between the log of a twelve-month moving sum of dividends and the log of lagged stock prices.
- Earning-price ratio (EP): the log of a twelve-month moving sum of earnings on the S&P 500 index minus the log of stock prices.
- Dividend-payout ratio (DE): DP minus EP.
- Excess stock return volatility (RVOL): the sum of the squared daily returns on the S&P 500 index.
- Book-to-market ratio (BM): book value at the end of the previous year divided by the end-of-month market value of the Dow-Jones Industrial Average index.
- Net equity expansion (NITS): the 12-month moving sum of net equity issues by NYSE-listed stocks divided by the total end-of-year market capitalization of NYSE stocks.
- Treasury bill rate (TBL): three-month Treasury bill interest rate from the secondary market rate.
- Long-term yield (LTY): the long-term government bond yield.
- Term Spread (TMS): LTY minus TBL.
- Default yield spread (DFY): Moody’s BAA- minus AAA-rated corporate bond yields.
- Inflation (INFL): change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers (Following common practice in literature, we lag the inflation one extra month due to the delayed release of the CPI index).
3.2. Dataset Used in NP-FDA Estimation
3.3. Forecast Combination
- Equally weighted forecasts or pooled -: this forecast combination method assigns equal weights to the forecasts of all individual models, i.e., for . This approach is likely to work well if the forecasting errors of different models have similar variances and are highly correlated, as explained in . Therefore, in many cases, this simple average of forecasts can work well against more sophisticated weighting schemes [26,29].
- Thick Modeling Approach with MSFE -: the second scheme consists of selecting models by means oh thick modeling approach. Following , the weight for model m is computed as:
- Diffusion Index: this scheme involves the estimation of factors that are subsequently used for forecasting. The idea here is to extract a small number of common factors (often called diffusion indexes) assumed to drive the dynamics associated with a large number of potential return predictors (see, e.g., ). The basic intuition behind this approach is to filter out the noise present in the individual predictors, as discussed in . The resulting factorial structure is more parsimoniuos, thus generating a more reliable signal.
- Sum-of-the-Parts Method: the fourth combination scheme is the sum-of-the-parts, which is in line with the ideas that are presented in . The sum-of-the-parts scheme consists of decomposing the return index into three components: the dividend yield, the earnings growth rate, and the growth rate in the price-earnings ratio. Subsequently, each of these components is predicted separately. Ref.  show that their sum-of-the-parts forecast scheme significantly outperforms the historical average forecast.
3.4. Forecast Evatuation
Out-of-Sample Excess Returns Predictability Results
3.5. Economic-Based Forecast Evaluation
3.6. Robustness Check
Conflicts of Interest
- Rapach, D.; Zhou, G. Forecasting Stock Returns. In Handbook of Economic Forecasting; Elliott, G., Granger, C., Timmermann, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 2, Chapter 0; pp. 328–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, I.; Goyal, A. A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2008, 21, 1455–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, J.; Thompson, S.B. Predicting Excess Stock Returns Out of Sample: Can Anything Beat the Historical Average? Rev. Financ. Stud. 2008, 21, 1509–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ferreira, M.; Santa-Clara, P. Forecasting stock market returns: The sum of the parts is more than the whole. J. Financ. Econ. 2011, 100, 514–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Pettenuzzo, D.; Timmermann, A.; Valkanov, R. Forecasting stock returns under economic constraints. J. Financ. Econ. 2014, 114, 517–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Pan, Z.; Pettenuzzo, D.; Wang, Y. Forecasting stock returns: A predictor-constrained approach. J. Empir. Financ. 2020, 55, 200–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsiakas, I.; Li, J.; Zhang, H. Equity premium prediction and the state of the economy. J. Empir. Financ. 2020, 58, 75–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, G.W.; Cliff, M.T. Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. J. Empir. Financ. 2004, 11, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, B.; Pruitt, S. Market Expectations in the Cross-Section of Present Values. J. Financ. 2013, 68, 1721–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neely, C.J.; Rapach, D.E.; Tu, J.; Zhou, G. Forecasting the Equity Risk Premium: The Role of Technical Indicators. Manag. Sci. 2014, 60, 1772–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mascio, D.A.; Fabozzi, F.J. Sentiment indices and their forecasting ability. J. Forecast. 2019, 38, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henkel, S.; Martin, J.S.; Nardari, F. Time-varying short-horizon predictability. J. Financ. Econ. 2011, 99, 560–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, A.; Timmermann, A. Regime Changes and Financial Markets. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 2012, 4, 313–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Dangl, T.; Halling, M. Predictive regressions with time-varying coefficients. J. Financ. Econ. 2012, 106, 157–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, K.L. Does the return-state-varying relationship between risk and return matter in modeling the time series process of stock return? Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2016, 42, 72–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapach, D.E.; Strauss, J.; Zhou, G. Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Combination Forecasts and Links to the Real Economy. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2010, 23, 821–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lima, L.R.; Meng, F. Out-of-Sample Return Predictability: A Quantile Combination Approach. J. Appl. Econom. 2017, 32, 877–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mascio, D.A.; Fabozzi, F.J.; Zumwalt, J.K. Market timing using combined forecasts and machine learning. J. Forecast. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, M.; Wurgler, J.; Yuan, Y. Global, Local, and Contagious Investor Sentiment. J. Financ. Econ. 2012, 104, 272–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Huang, D.; Jiang, F.; Tu, J.; Zhou, G. Investor Sentiment Aligned: A Powerful Predictor of Stock Returns. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2015, 28, 791–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraty, F.; Vieu, P. Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis: Theory and Practice, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ramsay, J.O.; Silverman, B.W. Functional Data Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Caldeira, J.; Torrent, H. Forecasting the US Term Structure of Interest Rates Using Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis. J. Forecast. 2017, 36, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraty, F.; Rabhi, A.; Vieu, P. Conditional Quantiles for Dependent Functional Data with Application to the Climatic “El Niño” Phenomenon. Sankhyā Indian J. Stat. 2005, 67, 378–398. [Google Scholar]
- Granger, C.W. Combining Forecasts–Twenty Years Later. J. Forecast. 1989, 8, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newbold, P.; Harvey, I.H. Forecast combination and encompassing. In A Companion to Economic Forecasting; Clements, M.P., Hendry, D.F., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Aiolfi, M.; Timmermann, A. Persistence in Forecasting Performance and Conditional Combination Strategies. J. Econom. 2006, 135, 31–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesaran, M.H.; Timmermann, A. Selection of estimation window in the presence of breaks. J. Econom. 2007, 137, 134–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, T.E.; McCracken, M.W. Improving Forecast Accuracy By Combining Recursive And Rolling Forecasts. Int. Econ. Rev. 2009, 50, 363–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timmermann, A. Forecast combinations. Handb. Econ. Forecast. 2006, 1, 135–196. [Google Scholar]
- Stock, J.H.; Watson, M.W. Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven-country data set. J. Forecast. 2004, 23, 405–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, T.E.; West, K.D. Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models. J. Econom. 2007, 138, 291–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cenesizoglu, T.; Timmermann, A. Do return prediction models add economic value? J. Bank. Financ. 2012, 36, 2974–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Wu, C.; Wu, W. Industry equi-correlation: A powerful predictor of stock returns. J. Empir. Financ. 2020, 59, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|Full Sample||Expansion||Recession||Full Sample||Expansion||Recession|
|RRMSFE||p-Value||Δ (annual %)|
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Caldeira, J.F.; Gupta, R.; Torrent, H.S. Forecasting U.S. Aggregate Stock Market Excess Return: Do Functional Data Analysis Add Economic Value? Mathematics 2020, 8, 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112042
Caldeira JF, Gupta R, Torrent HS. Forecasting U.S. Aggregate Stock Market Excess Return: Do Functional Data Analysis Add Economic Value? Mathematics. 2020; 8(11):2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112042Chicago/Turabian Style
Caldeira, João F., Rangan Gupta, and Hudson S. Torrent. 2020. "Forecasting U.S. Aggregate Stock Market Excess Return: Do Functional Data Analysis Add Economic Value?" Mathematics 8, no. 11: 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112042