Next Article in Journal
Variants on Andrica’s Conjecture with and without the Riemann Hypothesis
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Simple Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization
Open AccessArticle

A Sharp Rellich Inequality on the Sphere

by Songting Yin 1,2
1
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Tongling University, Tongling 244000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Applied Mathematics (Putian University), Fujian Province University, Putian 351100, China
Mathematics 2018, 6(12), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120288
Received: 25 October 2018 / Revised: 19 November 2018 / Accepted: 26 November 2018 / Published: 27 November 2018

Abstract

We obtain a Rellich type inequality on the sphere and give the corresponding best constant. The result complements some related inequalities in recent literatures.
Keywords: rellich inequality; sphere; sharp constant rellich inequality; sphere; sharp constant

1. Introduction

The classical Rellich inequality states that [1], for n 5 and all f C c ( R n \ { 0 } ) ,
R n | Δ f | 2 d x n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 R n f 2 | x | 4 d x .
The constant n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 is optimal and never archived. Under additional conditions there are also versions for lower dimensions. There has been a lot of research concerning the Rellich inequality on the Euclidean space due to its applications to spectral theory, harmonic analysis, geometry and partial differential equations. We see [2,3,4,5,6] and the references therein.
The validity of the Rellich inequality on a manifold and its best constants allows people to obtain qualitative properties on the manifold. For complete noncompact Riemannian manifolds, under some geometric assumptions on the weight function ρ , Kome and Özaydin [7] proved that for f C c ( M ρ 1 { 0 } ) (where α < 2 , C + α 3 > 0 )
M ρ α | Δ f | 2 d V ( C + α 3 ) 2 ( C α + 1 ) 2 16 M ρ α f 2 ρ 4 d V .
Particularly, they also obtained the improved versions of a Rellich-type inequality which involves both first and second order derivatives in the Poincaré conformal disc model ( n > 2 , 8 n 3 < α < 2 )
B n r α | Δ f | 2 d V ( n α ) 2 4 B n r α | f | 2 r 4 d V ,
where f C c ( B n ) and r = log 1 + | x | 1 | x | is the geodesic distance. Furthermore, the constant ( n α ) 2 4 is sharp. Along this line, we refer to [4,7,8,9,10,11] and so on.
However, there are not many literatures discussing the Rellich inequality on the sphere so far. See [12,13,14] for details. In [14] Xiao derived the following inequality
C S n f 2 sin 2 d ( p , x ) d V + S n | Δ f | 2 d V n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 S n f 2 d ( p , x ) 4 d V + S n f 2 ( π d ( p , x ) ) 4 d V
for f C c ( S n d 1 ( 0 ) d 1 ( π ) ) , where d ( p , x ) is the geodesic distance from p to x on S n and C is some positive constant. Moreover, the constant n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 is sharp.
In this short note we will obtain another type of Rellich inequality on the sphere and also give the corresponding sharp constant. Our main theorem is as follows:
Theorem 1.
Let ( S n , g ) ( n 5 ) be the n-sphere with sectional curvature 1 and p be a fixed point in S n . Then for any function f C c ( S n d 1 ( 0 ) d 1 ( π ) ) ,
C ( n ) S n f 2 sin 2 d ( p , x ) d V + S n | Δ f | 2 d V n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 S n f 2 sin 4 d ( p , x ) d V ,
where C ( n ) = n ( n 4 ) ( n 2 2 n 4 ) 8 and the constant n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 is sharp.
Remark 1.
In Euclidean spaces (resp. a Riemannian manifold, the Poincaré conformal disc model), the Laplacian of the distance function (resp. some weighted function) equals to n 1 | x | (resp. is not less than C ρ , n 1 r ). Thus the Rellich inequality certainly contains the term f 2 | x | 4 (resp. f 2 ρ 4 , f 2 r 4 ). Since on the sphere the Laplacian of the distance function is Δ d ( p , x ) = ( n 1 ) cot d ( p , x ) when d is smooth (see [15] p. 207), the terms f 2 sin 2 d ( p , x ) and f 2 sin 4 d ( p , x ) are naturally involved. So, it is a bit different in form from that in Euclidean spaces and some other type of Rellich inequalities. It is interesting that, even though the coefficient C ( n ) is replaced by an arbitrary number, the constant n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 is still sharp. To prove the result, we give some modifications in constructing the auxiliary function, and then do calculations in two hemispheres by using the antipodal points. The remainder of the approaches used are similar to Xiao’s paper [14]. See also in [7,16].

2. The Proof of the Main Result

Proof of Theorem 1.
Denote by r p ( x ) = d ( p , x ) the distance function from the fixed point p S n . Let f be a smooth function in C c ( S n \ { p , q } ) , where q is the antipodal point of p. Then
Δ f 2 = 2 f Δ f + 2 | f | 2 ,
and thus
2 S n f Δ f sin 2 r p d V = S n Δ f 2 sin 2 r p d V + 2 S n | f | 2 sin 2 r p d V .
Compute
S n Δ f 2 sin 2 r p d V = S n f 2 Δ sin 2 r p d V = S n f 2 div ( sin 2 r p ) d V = 2 S n f 2 div ( sin 3 r p cos r p r p ) d V = 2 S n f 2 sin 3 r p cos r p Δ r p + ( sin 3 r p cos r p ) d V = 2 S n f 2 n 4 sin 4 r p n 3 sin 2 r p d V ,
where we have used Δ r p = ( n 1 ) cot r p in the sphere. To estimate S n | f | 2 sin 2 r p d V , we put f = ( sin r p ) n 4 2 φ . Then
f = φ ( sin r p ) n 4 2 + ( sin r p ) n 4 2 φ ,
and
| f | 2 = φ 2 | ( sin r p ) n 4 2 | 2 + ( sin r p ) ( n 4 ) | φ | 2 + 2 ( sin r p ) n 4 2 φ ( sin r p ) n 4 2 , φ ( n 4 ) 2 4 φ 2 ( sin r p ) ( n 2 ) cos 2 r p + 1 2 ( sin r p ) ( n 4 ) , φ 2 .
This gives
S n | f | 2 sin 2 r p d V ( n 4 ) 2 4 S n φ 2 ( sin r p ) n cos 2 r p d V n 4 2 ( n 2 ) S n φ 2 Δ ( sin r p ) ( n 2 ) d V .
A direct computation shows that
Δ ( sin r p ) ( n 2 ) = div ( ( sin r p ) ( n 2 ) ) = ( n 2 ) div ( ( sin r p ) ( n 1 ) cos r p r p ) = ( n 2 ) ( sin r p ) ( n 1 ) cos r p Δ r p ( n 2 ) ( sin r p ) ( n 1 ) cos r p = ( n 2 ) ( sin r p ) 2 n .
Therefore,
S n | f | 2 sin 2 r p d V ( n 4 ) 2 4 S n φ 2 ( sin r p ) n cos 2 r p d V n 4 2 S n φ 2 ( sin r p ) 2 n d V = ( n 4 ) 2 4 S n φ 2 ( sin r p ) n d V ( n 4 ) 2 4 + n 4 2 S n φ 2 ( sin r p ) n 2 d V = ( n 4 ) 2 4 S n f 2 sin 4 r p d V ( n 4 ) 2 4 + n 4 2 S n f 2 sin 2 r p d V .
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, one has
2 S n f Δ f sin 2 r p d V n ( n 4 ) 4 S n f 2 sin 4 r p d V + 4 n ( n 4 ) S n | Δ f | 2 d V .
Finally, combining (1)∼(4), we obtain
n ( n 4 ) ( n 2 2 n 4 ) 8 S n f 2 sin 2 d ( p , x ) d V + S n | Δ f | 2 d V n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 S n f 2 sin 4 d ( p , x ) d V .
In what follows, we show the constant n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 is sharp. The skill is borrowed from [16] (see also [14]). Let η : R [ 0 , 1 ] be a smooth function such that 0 η 1 and
η ( t ) = 1 , t [ 1 , 1 ] ; 0 , | t | 2 .
Let H ( t ) = 1 η ( t ) . For sufficient small ε > 0 , Set
f ε ( r p ) = 0 , r p = 0 ; H ( r p ε ) sin 2 n 2 r p , 0 < r p π 2 ; H ( π r p ε ) sin 2 n 2 ( π r p ) , π 2 r p < π ; 0 , r p = π .
Observe that f ε ( r p ) can be approximated by smooth functions on the sphere S n .
Let q be the antipodal point of p. Then d ( p , q ) = π and for any point x S n we have r p + r q = π . Since the constructed function f ε possesses a fair degree of bilateral symmetry on the sphere, it is easier to compute in the following by using the antipodal points p and q.
S n f ε 2 sin 2 r p d V = B p ( π 2 ) f ε 2 sin 2 r p d V + B q ( π 2 ) f ε 2 sin 2 r p d V = Vol ( S n 1 ) ε π 2 H 2 ( r p ε ) sin r p d r + Vol ( S n 1 ) π 2 π ε H 2 ( π r p ε ) sin ( π r p ) d r = 2 Vol ( S n 1 ) ε π 2 H 2 ( r p ε ) sin r p d r π Vol ( S n 1 ) ,
S n f ε 2 sin 4 r p d V = B p ( π 2 ) f ε 2 sin 4 r p d V + B q ( π 2 ) f ε 2 sin 4 r p d V = Vol ( S n 1 ) ε π 2 H 2 ( r p ε ) sin 1 r p d r + Vol ( S n 1 ) π 2 π ε H 2 ( π r p ε ) sin 1 ( π r p ) d r = 2 Vol ( S n 1 ) ε π 2 H 2 ( r p ε ) sin 1 r p d r 2 Vol ( S n 1 ) 2 ε π 2 sin 1 r p d r .
Next we are to estimate S n | Δ f ε | 2 d V . When 0 < r p < π 2 , the distance function d ( p , x ) is smooth, and thus
Δ f ε = div ( f ε ) = div 1 ε H ( r p ε ) ( sin r ) n 4 2 n 4 2 H ( r p ε ) ( sin r p ) n 2 2 cos r p r p
= 1 ε H ( r p ε ) ( sin r p ) n 4 2 n 4 2 H ( r p ε ) ( sin r p ) n 2 2 cos r p ( n 1 ) cot r p + 1 ε H ( r p ε ) ( sin r p ) n 4 2 n 4 2 H ( r p ε ) ( sin r p ) n 2 2 cos r p = 1 ε 2 ( sin r p ) n 4 2 H ( r p ε ) + 3 ε ( sin r p ) n 2 2 cos r p H ( r p ε ) n 4 2 H ( r p ε ) n 2 ( sin r p ) n 2 cos 2 r p ( sin r p ) n 4 2 ,
and when π 2 < r p < π , one can get the same formula as above by letting r q = π r p . Therefore,
S n | Δ f ε | 2 d V = B p ( π 2 ) | Δ f ε | 2 d V + B q ( π 2 ) | Δ f ε | 2 d V = 2 B p ( π 2 ) | Δ f ε | 2 d V ,
and thus by Minkowski inequality,
1 Vol ( S n 1 ) 1 2 S n | Δ f ε | 2 d V 1 2 = 2 Vol ( S n 1 ) 1 2 B p ( π 2 ) | Δ f ε | 2 d V 1 2 2 ε π 2 H 2 ( r p ε ) n ( n 4 ) 4 ( sin r p ) n 2 cos 2 r p + n 4 2 ( sin r p ) n 4 2 2 ( sin r p ) n 1 d r 1 2 + 3 2 ε ε 2 ε ( sin r p ) n 2 2 cos r p H ( r p ε ) 2 ( sin r p ) n 1 d r 1 2 + 2 ε 2 ε 2 ε ( sin r p ) n 4 2 H ( r p ε ) 2 ( sin r p ) n 1 d r 1 2 = I + I I + I I I .
A straightforward calculation yields
I 2 ε π 2 n ( n 4 ) 4 ( sin r p ) n 2 + ( n 4 ) ( n + 2 ) 4 ( sin r p ) n 4 2 2 ( sin r p ) n 1 d r 1 2 , I I 3 2 ε max t [ 0 , 2 ] H ( t ) ε 2 ε ( sin r p ) n 2 2 cos r p 2 ( sin r p ) n 1 d r 1 2 3 2 ε max t [ 0 , 2 ] H ( t ) ε 2 ε r p d r 1 2 = 3 3 max t [ 0 , 2 ] H ( t ) , I I I 2 ε 2 max t [ 0 , 2 ] H ( t ) ε 2 ε sin 3 r p d r 1 2 2 ε 2 max t [ 0 , 2 ] H ( t ) ε 2 ε r p 3 d r 1 2 = 15 max t [ 0 , 2 ] H ( t ) .
Since f ε ( r p ) can be approximated by smooth functions on the sphere S n , then, by (5)–(7), it holds that
inf f C ( S n ) \ { 0 } S n | Δ f | 2 d V + C ( n ) S n f 2 sin 2 r p d V S n f 2 sin 4 r p d V S n | Δ f ε | 2 d V + C ( n ) S n f ε 2 sin 2 r p d V S n f ε 2 sin 4 r p d V π C ( n ) 2 2 ε π 2 sin 1 r p d r + I + I I + I I I 2 2 ε π 2 sin 1 r p d r 2 .
Letting ε 0 + , we have
inf f C ( S n ) \ { 0 } S n | Δ f | 2 d V + C ( n ) S n f 2 sin 2 r p d V S n f 2 sin 4 r p d V lim ε 0 + ε π 2 n ( n 4 ) 4 ( sin r p ) n 2 + ( n 4 ) ( n + 2 ) 4 ( sin r p ) n 4 2 2 ( sin r p ) n 1 d r 2 ε π 2 sin 1 r p d r = lim ε 0 + n ( n 4 ) 4 ( sin ε ) n 2 + ( n 4 ) ( n + 2 ) 4 ( sin ε ) n 4 2 2 ( sin ε ) n 1 2 sin ( 2 ε ) 1 = n 2 ( n 4 ) 2 16 .
This completes the proof. □

Funding

This project is supported by AHNSF (1608085MA03), NNSFC(11471246) and KLAMFJPU (No. SX201805).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rellich, F. Perturbation Theory of Eigenvalue Problems; Gordon and Breach: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brezis, H.; Vázquez, J.L. Blow-up solutions of some nonlinear elliptic problems. Rev. Mat. Univ. Comp. Madrid 1997, 10, 443–469. [Google Scholar]
  3. Costa, D.G. On Hardy-Rellich type inequalities in R n . Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22, 902–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Davies, E.B.; Hinz, A.M. Explicit constants for Rellich inequalities in Lp(Ω). Math. Z. 1998, 227, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gazzola, F.; Grunau, H.-C.; Mitidieri, E. Hardy inequalities with optimal constants and remainder terms. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 356, 2149–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tertikas, A.; Zographopoulos, N. Best constants in the Hardy-Rellich Inequalities and Related Improvements. Adv. Math. 2007, 209, 407–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kombe, I.; Özaydin, M. Improved Hardy and Rellich inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2009, 361, 6191–6203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Grillo, G. Hardy and Rellich-type inequalities for metrics defined by vector fields. Potential Anal. 2003, 18, 187–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghoussoub, N.; Moradifam, A. Bessel pairs and optimal Hardy and Hardy-Rellich inequalities. Math. Ann. 2011, 349, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kombe, I.; Özaydin, M. Hardy-Poincaré, Rellich and uncertainty principle inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2013, 365, 5035–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Du, F.; Mao, J. Hardy and Rellich type inequalities on metric measure spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2015, 429, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abolarinwa, A.; Apata, T. Lp-Hardy-Rellich and uncertainty principle inequalities on the sphere. Adv. Oper. Theory 2018, 3, 745–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dai, F.; Xu, Y. The Hardy-Rellich Inequality and Uncertainty Principle Inequalities on the Sphere. Constr. Approx. 2014, 40, 141–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, Y. Some Hardy inequalities on the sphere. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bai, Z.; Shen, Y.; Shui, N.; Guo, X. An introduction to Riemann Geometry; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2004; Volume 12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, Q.; Su, D.; Kong, Y. Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds with negative curvature. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2014, 16, 1350043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Back to TopTop