Next Article in Journal
The Collapse of Ecosystem Engineer Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Best Approximation of the Fractional Semi-Derivative Operator by Exponential Series
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Numerical Solution of Multiterm Fractional Differential Equations Using the Matrix Mittag–Leffler Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Note on the Equivalence of Fractional Relaxation Equations to Differential Equations with Varying Coefficients

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, and the National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Via Irnerio, 46, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
Mathematics 2018, 6(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/math6010008
Submission received: 14 December 2017 / Revised: 3 January 2018 / Accepted: 5 January 2018 / Published: 9 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fractional Calculus: Theory and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this note, we show how an initial value problem for a relaxation process governed by a differential equation of a non-integer order with a constant coefficient may be equivalent to that of a differential equation of the first order with a varying coefficient. This equivalence is shown for the simple fractional relaxation equation that points out the relevance of the Mittag–Leffler function in fractional calculus. This simple argument may lead to the equivalence of more general processes governed by evolution equations of fractional order with constant coefficients to processes governed by differential equations of integer order but with varying coefficients. Our main motivation is to solicit the researchers to extend this approach to other areas of applied science in order to have a deeper knowledge of certain phenomena, both deterministic and stochastic ones, investigated nowadays with the techniques of the fractional calculus.

1. Introduction

Let us consider the following relaxation equation
d Ψ d t = r ( t ) Ψ ( t ) , t 0 ,
subjected to the initial condition, for the sake of simplicity,
Ψ ( 0 + ) = 1 ,
where Ψ ( t ) and r ( t ) are positive functions, sufficiently well-behaved for t 0 . In Equation (1), Ψ ( t ) denotes a non-dimensional field variable and r ( t ) the varying relaxation coefficient.
The solution of the above initial value problem reads
Ψ ( t ) = exp [ R ( t ) ] , R ( t ) = 0 t r ( t ) d t > 0 .
It is easy to recognize from re-arranging Equation (1) that, for t 0 ,
r ( t ) = Φ ( t ) Ψ ( t ) , Φ ( t ) = Ψ ( 1 ) ( t ) = d Ψ d t ( t ) .
The solution (3) can be derived by solving the initial value problem by separation of variables
1 Ψ ( t ) d Ψ ( t ) Ψ ( t ) = 0 t Φ ( t ) Ψ ( t ) d t = 0 t r ( t ) d t = R ( t ) .
>From Equation (3), we also note that
R ( t ) = log [ Ψ ( t ) ] .
As a matter of fact, we have shown well-known results that will be relevant for the next sections.

2. Mittag–Leffler Function as a Solution of the Fractional Relaxation Process

Let us now consider the following initial value problem for the so-called fractional relaxation process
* D t α Ψ α ( ( t ) = Ψ α ( t ) , t 0 , Ψ α ( 0 + ) = 1 ,
with α ( 0 , 1 ] . Above, we have labeled the field variable with Ψ α to point out its dependence on α and considered the Caputo fractional derivative, defined as:
* D t α Ψ α ( t ) = 1 Γ ( 1 α ) 0 t Ψ α ( 1 ) ( t ) ( t t ) α d t , 0 < α < 1 , d d t Ψ α ( t ) , α = 1 .
As found in many treatises of fractional calculus, and, in particular, in the 2007 survey paper by Mainardi and Gorenflo [1] to which the interested reader is referred for details and additional references, the solution of the fractional relaxation problem (7) can be obtained by using the technique of the Laplace transform in terms of the Mittag–Leffler function. Indeed, we get in an obvious notation by applying the Laplace transform to Equation (7)
s α Ψ ˜ α ( s ) s α 1 = Ψ ˜ α ( s ) , hence Ψ ˜ α ( s ) = s α 1 s α + 1 ,
so that
Ψ α ( t ) = E α ( t α ) = n = 0 ( 1 ) n t α n Γ ( α n + 1 ) .
For more details on the Mittag–Leffler function, we refer to the recent treatise by Gorenflo et al. [2]. In Figure 1, for readers’ convenience, we report the plots of the solution (10) for some values of the parameter α ( 0 , 1 ] .
It can be noticed that, for α 1 , the solution of the initial value problem reduces to the exponential function exp ( t ) with a singular limit for t because of the asymptotic representation for α ( 0 , 1 ) ,
E α ( t α ) t α Γ ( α + 1 ) , t .
Now, it is time to carry out the comparison between the two initial value problems described by Equations (1) and (7) with their corresponding solutions (3), (10). It is clear that we must consider the derivative of the Mittag–Leffler function in (10), namely
Φ α ( t ) = d d t Ψ α ( t ) = d d t E α ( t α ) = t α 1 E α , α ( t α ) .
In Figure 2, we show the plots of positive function Φ α ( t ) for some values of α ( 0 , 1 ] .
The above discussion leads to the varying relaxation coefficient of the equivalent ordinary relaxation process:
r α ( t ) = Φ α ( t ) Ψ α ( t ) r α ( t ) = t α 1 E α , α ( t α ) E α ( t α ) t α 1 Γ ( α ) , t 0 + , α t 1 , t + .
Figure 3 depicts the plots of r α ( t ) for some rational values of α , including the standard case α = 1 , in which the ratio reduces to the constant 1.
We conclude by plotting in Figure 4 the function R α ( t ) = log [ Ψ α ( t ) ] for some values of the parameter α ( 0 , 1 ] .

3. Conclusions

In this note, we have shown how the fractional relaxation process governed by a fractional differential equation with a constant coefficient is equivalent to a relaxation process governed by an ordinary differential equation with a varying coefficient. These considerations provide a different look at this fractional process over all for experimentalists who can measure the varying relaxation coefficient versus time. Indeed, if this coefficient is found to fit the analytical or asymptotical expressions in Label (13), the researcher cannot distinguish if the governing equation is fractional or simply ordinary. To make the difference, we thus need other experimental results.
We are convinced that it is possible to adapt the above reasoning to other fractional processes, including anomalous relaxation in viscoelastic and dielectric media and anomalous diffusion in complex systems. This extension is left to perceptive readers who can explore these possibilities.
Last but not least, we do not claim to be original in using the above analogy in view of the great simplicity of the argument: for example, a similar procedure has recently been used by Sandev et al. [3] in dealing with the fractional Schrödinger equation.

Acknowledgments

The author is very grateful to Leonardo Benini, a Master’s student in Physics (University of Bologna), for his valuable help in plotting. As a matter of fact, he has used the MATLAB routine for the Mittag–Leffler function appointed by Roberto Garrappa (see https://it.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/48154-the-mittag-leffler-function). The author would like to devote this note to the memory of the late Rudolf Gorenflo (1930–2017), with whom for 20 years he had published joint papers. The author presumes that this note is written in the spirit of Gorenflo, being based on the simpler considerations. This work has been carried out in the framework of the activities of the National Group of Mathematical Physics (GNFM-INdAM). Furthermore, the author has appreciated constructive remarks and suggestions of the anonymous referees that helped to improve this note.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mainardi, F.; Gorenflo, R. Time-fractional derivatives in relaxation processes: A tutorial survey. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2007, 10, 269–308. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gorenflo, R.; Kilbas, A.A.; Mainardi, F.; Rogosin, S. Mittag–Leffler Functions, Related Topics and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sandev, T.; Petreska, I.; Lenzi, E.K. Effective potential from the generalized time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Mathematics 2016, 4, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plots of the Mittag–Leffler function Ψ α ( t ) for α = 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Figure 1. Plots of the Mittag–Leffler function Ψ α ( t ) for α = 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Mathematics 06 00008 g001
Figure 2. Plots of the positive function Φ α ( t ) for α = 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Figure 2. Plots of the positive function Φ α ( t ) for α = 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Mathematics 06 00008 g002
Figure 3. Plots of the ratio r α ( t ) for α = 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Figure 3. Plots of the ratio r α ( t ) for α = 0.25 , 0.50 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Mathematics 06 00008 g003
Figure 4. Plots of R α ( t ) = log [ Ψ α ( t ) ] for α = 0.25 , 0.5 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Figure 4. Plots of R α ( t ) = log [ Ψ α ( t ) ] for α = 0.25 , 0.5 , 0.75 , 1 versus t [ 0 , 5 ] .
Mathematics 06 00008 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mainardi, F. A Note on the Equivalence of Fractional Relaxation Equations to Differential Equations with Varying Coefficients. Mathematics 2018, 6, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6010008

AMA Style

Mainardi F. A Note on the Equivalence of Fractional Relaxation Equations to Differential Equations with Varying Coefficients. Mathematics. 2018; 6(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mainardi, Francesco. 2018. "A Note on the Equivalence of Fractional Relaxation Equations to Differential Equations with Varying Coefficients" Mathematics 6, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6010008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop