Next Article in Journal
Structural Properties of Optimal Maintenance Policies for k-out-of-n Systems with Interdependence Between Internal Deterioration and External Shocks
Next Article in Special Issue
Two-Variable q-General-Appell Polynomials Within the Context of the Monomiality Principle
Previous Article in Journal
Abundant Elliptic, Trigonometric, and Hyperbolic Stochastic Solutions for the Stochastic Wu–Zhang System in Quantum Mechanics
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Symmetrical Sonin Kernels in Terms of Hypergeometric-Type Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Results for Certain Jacobsthal-Type Polynomials

by
Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed
1,2,*,
Omar Mazen Alqubori
2 and
Amr Kamel Amin
3,4
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
2
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23831, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Mathematics, Adham University College, Umm AL-Qura University, Makkah 28653, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2025, 13(5), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050715
Submission received: 17 January 2025 / Revised: 7 February 2025 / Accepted: 21 February 2025 / Published: 22 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polynomials: Theory and Applications, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
This paper investigates a class of Jacobsthal-type polynomials (JTPs) that involves one parameter. We present several new formulas for these polynomials, including expressions for their derivatives, moments, and linearization formulas. The key idea behind the derivation of these formulas is based on developing a new connection formula that expresses the shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the third kind in terms of the JTPs. This connection formula is used to deduce a new inversion formula of the JTPs. Therefore, by utilizing the power form representation of these polynomials and their corresponding inversion formula, we can derive additional expressions for them. Additionally, we compute some definite integrals based on some formulas of these polynomials.

1. Introduction

Special functions are fundamental in many fields of applied sciences. They help in addressing many problems in the applied sciences. Applications for some special functions can be found in [1,2]. The authors of [3] discussed the role of special functions in mathematical physics. Regarding some theoretical studies of special polynomials, the authors of [4] discussed probabilistic degenerate Fubini polynomials. In [5], the authors investigated probabilistic degenerate Stirling polynomials accompanied by some applications. The authors in [6] developed some results of Appell polynomials. Some generalized polynomials were discussed in [7], accompanied by some applications. Some new formulas concerned with the convolved Fibonacci polynomials were developed in [8]. A generalized class of polynomials associated with Hermite and Euler polynomials was introduced in [9]. A class of Poly-Genocchi polynomials was introduced in [10]. Some formulas and recurrence relations for general polynomial sequences were introduced in [11]. Some generalized Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials were investigated in [12]. Unified Chebyshev polynomials (CPs) were introduced and explored from a theoretical point of view in [13].
From a practical point of view, the different sequences of polynomials are crucial. For example, some applications of Hermite polynomials can be found in [14,15]. Many sequences of polynomials were utilized to solve various types of differential equations (DEs). For example, the Bernstein polynomial basis was employed in [16] to treat the Korteweg–de Vries equation. The authors of [17] solved the Sobolev equation using mixed Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. A certain Lucas polynomial sequence was used in [18] to solve the time-fractional generalized Kawahara equation. The shifted Vieta–Lucas polynomials were employed in [19] to treat the fractional advection-dispersion equation. In [20], Genocchi polynomials were used to treat a specific fractional model. The authors of [21] used Schröder polynomials to treat a particular fractional model. The authors of [22,23] used various types of CPs to solve some DEs. In [24], the authors followed a spectral method based on Genocchi polynomials to treat some singular fractional DEs. The authors of [25] used Changhee polynomials to treat high-dimensional chaotic Lorenz systems.
Generalized hypergeometric functions are a crucial family of special functions with extensive applications in engineering, mathematics, and physics. They serve to generalize a large class of special and elementary functions, enabling many essential functions to be expressed in terms of them. These functions significantly address important problems related to special functions, including connection and linearization formulas. Various approaches have been used to compute the connection coefficients between different polynomials. For more details, see, for example [26,27,28,29,30,31]. In addition, the expressions for the derivatives of different polynomials in terms of their original ones are crucial in numerical analysis. For example, the author in [32] has developed new derivative expressions for the sixth-kind CPs. Some terminating hypergeometric functions of the type F 3 4 ( 1 ) were involved in these equations.
Numerous studies have been conducted on some classes of the Lucas polynomial sequence. For example, the authors of [33] derived sums of Lucas and Pell polynomials. The authors of [34] studied some generalized polynomials. In [35], a study on generalized Fibonacci polynomials was presented. Some other contributions regarding these sequences can be found in [36,37,38,39,40]. However, there are fewer studies on Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal–Lucas polynomials compared to those on Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. For example, Koshy in [41] has developed infinite sums involving Jacobsthal polynomials. The same author in [42,43] has derived some formulas related to Jacobsthal polynomials. Djordjevic in [44] has developed some results regarding the derivative sequences of generalized Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal–Lucas polynomials. Some results on third-order Jacobsthal polynomials were derived in [45]. In [46], some infinite sums involving Jacobsthal polynomials were developed. Other sums involving a class of Jacobsthal polynomial squares were developed in [47]. For some other studies regarding Jacobsthal polynomials and their related polynomials, one can refer to [48,49,50].
This paper introduces a class of JTPs. New formulas for these polynomials will be developed. We can summarize the main objectives of the current paper in the following items:
  • Developing a new connection formula between the shifted CPs of the third kind and the JTPs.
  • Deriving a new inversion formula of JTPs based on the above connection formula.
  • Derivation of the moment and linearization formulas of the JTPs.
  • Developing new derivative formulas for the JTPs using other polynomials. Additionally, we will also derive the inverse derivative formulas.
  • Introducing some definite integrals using some of the introduced formulas.
The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents some properties of a certain generalized Lucas polynomial sequence. Some other polynomials are also accounted for. Two basic formulas of the JTPs are developed in Section 3. Moment and linearization formulas of the JTPs are presented in Section 4. New derivative expressions of the JTPs in terms of different polynomials are given in Section 5. Section 6 gives the inverse formulas to those provided in Section 5. Section 7 developed some definite integral formulas that are deduced as consequences of some of the developed formulas. Finally, Section 8 reports some findings.

2. Some Fundamentals and Basic Formulas

This section is devoted to presenting some characteristics of the Lucas polynomial sequence. In addition, some particular classes of this sequence are accounted for. This section also provides an account of certain other polynomials.
Horadam in [51] introduced two sequences of polynomials that can be generated, respectively, by the following two recursive formulas:
W n ( x ) = p ( x ) W n 1 ( x ) + q ( x ) W n 2 ( x ) , W 0 ( x ) = 0 , W 1 ( x ) = 1 ,
w n ( x ) = p ¯ ( x ) w n 1 ( x ) + q ¯ ( x ) w n 2 ( x ) , w 0 ( x ) = 2 , w 1 ( x ) = p ¯ ( x ) .
They can be written explicitly in the following forms:
W n ( x ) = p ( x ) + p 2 ( x ) + 4 q ( x ) n p ( x ) p 2 ( x ) + 4 q ( x ) n 2 n p 2 ( x ) + 4 q ( x ) ,
w n ( x ) = p ¯ ( x ) + p ¯ 2 ( x ) + 4 q ¯ ( x ) n + p ¯ ( x ) p ¯ 2 ( x ) + 4 q ¯ ( x ) n 2 n .
Remark 1. 
Many celebrated sequences are particular ones of the two polynomial sequences W n ( x ) and w n ( x ) . Table 1 exhibits some of these polynomials.
Many sequences generalize the two standard sequences of Fibonacci and Lucas sequences, which can also be extracted from the two sequences W n ( x ) and w n ( x ) as special cases. The two sequences F k a , b ( x ) and L k c , d ( x ) , which are considered generalizations of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials, can be generated from the following two recursive formulas:
F k a , b ( x ) = a x F k 1 a , b ( x ) + b F k 2 a , b ( x ) , F 0 a , b ( x ) = 1 , F 1 a , b ( x ) = a x , k 2 ,
L k c , d ( x ) = c x L k 1 c , d ( x ) + d L k 2 c , d ( x ) , L 0 c , d ( x ) = 2 , L 1 c , d ( x ) = c x , k 2 .
Remark 2. 
It is evident from Table 1 that the Jacobsthal polynomials can be constructed using the following recurrence relation:
J n ( x ) = J n 1 ( x ) + 2 x J n 2 ( x ) , J 0 ( x ) = 0 , J 1 ( x ) = 1 .
These polynomials can be constructed using the following generating function [52]:
n = 0 t n J n ( x ) = t 1 t 2 x t 2 .
The series representation of the Jacobsthal polynomials is given by [53]
J n ( x ) = i = 0 n 1 2 n i 1 i x i ,
where z denotes the well-known floor function.
Remark 3. 
Many sequences generalize the sequence of Jacobsthal polynomials. Within these sequences is the sequence J n a , b ( x ) n 0 that can be constructed with the aid of the following recurrence relation:
J n a , b ( x ) = a J n 1 a , b ( x ) + b x J n 2 a , b ( x ) , J 0 a , b ( x ) = 0 , J 1 a , b ( x ) = 1 .
Based on the recurrence relation (10), it can be shown that the polynomials J n a , b ( x ) n 0 can be generated using the following generating function:
n = 0 t n J n a , b ( x ) = t 1 a t b x t 2 .
Remark 4. 
From the representation in (9), we can write the following representation for J n + 1 ( x ) :
J ^ n ( x ) = J n + 1 ( x ) = i = 0 n 2 i + n n 2 n 2 i x n 2 i .
In addition, the above representation can be split into the following two representations:
J ^ 2 n ( x ) = i = 0 n n + i n i x n i , J ^ 2 n + 1 ( x ) = i = 0 n n + i + 1 n i x n i .
Remark 5. 
To the best of our knowledge, many formulas related to the Jacobsthal polynomials and their related polynomials are traceless in the literature, such as their derivative, moment, and linearization formulas. We also found no correlations between these formulas and orthogonal polynomials. This motivates us to investigate the JTPs further.
This paper considers a kind of JTPs generated by the following recursive formula:
J n a ( x ) = a J n 1 a ( x ) a 2 4 x J n 2 a ( x ) , J 0 ( x ) = 1 , J 1 ( x ) = a .
Remark 6. 
In this paper, we restrict our study of the generalized Jacobsthal polynomials generated by (10) to the case corresponding to: b = a 2 4 , since in such a case, we will prove that the Chebyshev polynomials of the third kind can be written as a simple combination of them that does not involve any hypergeometric term. This pivotal formula in our study helped us develop further formulas related to these polynomials.

An Overview of Some Polynomials

We will present an overview of a selection of orthogonal and non-orthogonal polynomials. Two families of polynomials, one symmetric and the other non-symmetric, are considered. We will refer to them as ϕ m ( x ) and ψ m ( x ) , and they have the following analytic representations:
ϕ m ( x ) = = 0 m 2 H , m x m 2 ,
ψ m ( x ) = = 0 m F , m x m ,
where H r , s and F r , s are known coefficients.
In addition, let us assume that the inversion Formulas for (14) and (15) are as follows:
x m = = 0 m 2 H ¯ , m ϕ m 2 ( x ) ,
x m = = 0 m F ¯ , m ψ m ( x ) ,
where H ¯ , m and F ¯ , m are known coefficients.
We provide some famous polynomials that may be defined as in (14) and (15). The normalized shifted Jacobi polynomials are expressed as [8]:
R ˜ m ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) = = 0 m ( 1 ) m ! Γ ( ρ + 1 ) ( γ + 1 ) m ( ρ + γ + 1 ) 2 m ! ( m ) ! Γ ( m + ρ + 1 ) ( ρ + γ + 1 ) m ( γ + 1 ) m x m .
R ˜ ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) are orthogonal on [ 0 , 1 ] in the sense that
0 1 ( 1 x ) ρ x γ R ˜ ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) R ˜ k ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) d x = 0 , k , h ˜ ρ , γ , k = ,
where
h ˜ ρ , γ = k ! Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 2 Γ ( k + γ + 1 ) ( 2 k + ρ + γ + 1 ) Γ ( k + ρ + 1 ) Γ ( k + ρ + γ + 1 ) .
Specifically, the ultraspherical polynomials are symmetric Jacobi polynomials. We have
C m ( γ ) ( x ) = R ˜ m ( γ 1 2 , γ 1 2 ) ( x ) .
Moreover, we note that Jacobi polynomials involve four kinds of CPs. The following recurrence relation can generate all these kinds:
C m ( x ) = 2 x C m 1 ( x ) C m 2 ( x ) ,
but with different initials.
In addition, the moment formula for C m ( x ) is given by
x C m ( x ) = 1 2 s = 0 s C + m 2 s ( x ) .
Remark 7. 
Examples of important non-symmetric polynomials are the shifted Jacobi polynomials R ˜ m ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) that are expressed in (18), Schröder polynomials S ( x ) , and Bernoulli polynomials B ( x ) . Table 2 presents the power form and inversion coefficients for these non-symmetric polynomials.
Remark 8. 
Some examples of important symmetric polynomials are the ultraspherical polynomials that are given by (21), Hermite polynomials H ( x ) , and the two generalized classes of Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials that are generated, respectively, by (5) and (6). Table 3 represents the power form and inversion coefficients for these polynomials.

3. Two Basic Formulas of the Generalized Jacobsthal Polynomials

This section is devoted to developing two basic formulas of the JTPs: J i a ( x ) generated by (7). The first is the series representation of J i a ( x ) , while the second formula exhibits the expression of x m in terms of J i a ( x ) . These two formulas will be the backbone for many formulas in this paper.
Lemma 1. 
For any non-negative integer m, one has
J m a ( x ) = a m r = 0 m 2 1 4 r m r r x r .
Proof. 
First, let
ξ m a ( x ) = a m r = 0 m 2 1 4 r m r r x r .
It is easy to see that
ξ 0 a ( x ) = J 0 a ( x ) = 1 , ξ 1 a ( x ) = J 1 a ( x ) = a .
In addition, by performing some computations, we can show that the following relation holds:
ξ m a ( x ) a ξ m 1 a ( x ) + a 2 4 x ξ m 2 a ( x ) = 0 .
This proves that
ξ m a ( x ) = J m a ( x ) , m 0 .
Lemma 1 is now proved. □
Remark 9. 
Two representations may be obtained from the power form given in (24):
J 2 m a ( x ) = a 2 m r = 0 m 1 4 m r ( m + r ) ! ( 2 r ) ! ( m r ) ! x m r ,
J 2 m + 1 a ( x ) = a 2 m + 1 r = 0 m 1 4 m r ( m + r + 1 ) ! ( 2 r + 1 ) ! ( m r ) ! x m r .
Now, we are going to show that the shifted CPs of the third-kind V r * ( x ) , r 0 , can be written as a combination of the polynomials J i a ( x ) .
Theorem 1. 
The formula that connects the third-kind CPs and the polynomials J i a ( x ) is given by
V r * ( x ) = ( 1 ) r s = 0 r 4 a 2 r 2 s 4 r 2 s + 1 2 s J 2 r 2 s a ( x ) + ( 1 ) r + 1 s = 0 r 1 4 a 2 r 2 s 1 4 r 2 s 2 s + 1 J 2 r 2 s 1 a ( x ) , r 0 .
Proof. 
We will prove Formula (28) by induction on r. It is obvious that (28) holds for r = 0 . Now, we are going to prove the following connection formula:
V r * ( x ) = s = 0 r G s , r J 2 r 2 s a ( x ) + s = 0 r 1 G ¯ s , r J 2 r 2 s 1 a ( x ) , r 1 ,
where
G s , r = ( 1 ) r 4 a 2 r 2 s 4 r 2 s + 1 2 s , G ¯ s , r = ( 1 ) r + 1 4 a 2 r 2 s 1 4 r 2 s 2 s + 1 .
We proceed with the proof by induction. Assume that Formula (29) is valid for all n < r , i.e.,
V n * ( x ) = s = 0 n G s , n J 2 n 2 s a ( x ) + s = 0 n 1 G ¯ s , n J 2 n 2 s 1 a ( x ) ,
and we must prove that (29) is itself valid.
Now, we start with the recurrence relation satisfied by V r * ( x ) :
V r * ( x ) = 2 ( 2 x 1 ) V r 1 * ( x ) V r 2 * ( x ) ,
and apply the inductive assumption to write V r 1 * ( x ) and V r 2 * ( x ) to obtain
V r 1 * ( x ) = s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 J 2 r 2 s 2 a ( x ) + s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 J 2 r 2 s 3 a ( x ) , V r 2 * ( x ) = s = 0 r 2 G s , r 2 J 2 r 2 s 4 a ( x ) + s = 0 r 3 G ¯ s , r 2 J 2 r 2 s 5 a ( x ) .
The last two expressions, along with (31), enable one to write V r * ( x ) in the following form:
V r 1 * ( x ) = 2 ( 2 x 1 ) s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 2 a + s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 3 a s = 0 r 2 G s , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 4 a + s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 5 a .
Now, inserting the recurrence relation (13) in the form
x J k a ( x ) = 4 a 2 J k + 2 a ( x ) a J k + 1 a ( x ) ,
into (32) yields the following formula:
V r * ( x ) = 16 a 2 s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 ( a J 2 + 2 j 2 s a ( x ) + J 1 + 2 j 2 s a ( x ) ) + s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 ( a J 1 + 2 j 2 s a ( x ) + J 2 j 2 s a ( x ) ) 2 s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 2 a ( x ) + s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 3 a ( x ) s = 0 r 2 G s , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 4 a ( x ) + s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 5 a ( x ) .
Now, we can write
V r * ( x ) = 1 + 2 ,
where
1 = 16 a s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 J 2 + 2 j 2 s a ( x ) 16 a 2 s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s a ( x )
2 s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 2 a ( x ) s = 0 r 2 G s , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 4 a ( x ) ,
2 = 16 a 2 s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 1 a ( x ) + 16 a s = 0 r 1 G s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 1 a ( x )
2 s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 1 J 2 j 2 s 3 a ( x ) s = 0 r 2 G ¯ s , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 5 a ( x ) .
Some algebraic manipulations transform 1 and 2 into the following forms:
1 = s = 0 r 16 a G ¯ s 1 , r 1 16 a 2 G s , r 1 2 G s 1 , r 1 G s 2 , r 2 J 2 j 2 s a ( x ) , 2 = s = 0 r 1 16 a 2 G ¯ s , r 1 + 16 a G s , r 1 2 G ¯ s 1 , r 1 G ¯ s 2 , r 2 J 2 j 2 s 1 a ( x ) .
It is not difficult to show that the following two identities hold:
16 a G ¯ s 1 , r 1 16 a 2 G s , r 1 2 G s 1 , r 1 G s 2 , r 2 = G s , r ,
16 a 2 G ¯ s , r 1 + 16 a G s , r 1 2 G ¯ s 1 , r 1 G ¯ s 2 , r 2 = G ¯ s , r ,
and this proves that
V r * ( x ) = s = 0 r G s , r J 2 r 2 s a ( x ) + s = 0 r 1 G ¯ s , r J 2 r 2 s 1 a ( x ) .
This finalizes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Theorem 2. 
Let r be a non-negative integer. The following inversion formula for the JTPs holds:
x r = ( 1 ) r 2 2 r s = 0 r a 2 s 2 r ( 1 2 s + r ) 2 s ( 2 s ) ! J 2 r 2 s a ( x ) + ( 1 ) r + 1 2 2 r s = 0 r 1 a 2 s 2 r + 1 ( 2 s + r ) 1 + 2 s ( 2 s + 1 ) ! J 2 r 2 s 1 a ( x ) .
Proof. 
The inversion formula of V j * ( x ) is given by [54]
x r = 4 r ( 2 r + 1 ) ! = 0 r 1 ! ( 1 + 2 r ) ! V r * ( x ) .
By virtue of the connection Formula (28), one can write
x r = i = 0 r ( 1 ) i r 4 r ( 2 r + 1 ) ! a 2 i 2 r i ! ( 1 i + 2 r ) ! s = 0 r i 4 2 i 2 s + 2 r a 2 s 1 4 i 2 s + 4 r 2 s J 2 r 2 i 2 s a ( x ) + i = 0 r ( 1 ) i r + 1 4 r ( 2 r + 1 ) ! a 2 i 2 r i ! ( 1 i + 2 r ) ! s = 0 r i 1 2 2 4 i 4 s + 4 r a 2 s + 1 4 i 2 s + 4 r 1 + 2 s J 2 r 2 i 2 s 1 a ( x ) .
Some calculations lead to the following formula:
x r = s = 0 r 4 2 s + r ( 2 r + 1 ) ! a 2 s 2 r = 0 s ( 1 ) + r 1 2 2 s + 4 r 2 + 2 s ! ( + 2 r + 1 ) ! J 2 r 2 s a ( x ) + s = 0 r 1 4 1 2 s + r ( 2 r + 1 ) ! a 2 s 2 r + 1 = 0 s ( 1 ) + r + 1 2 ( + s 2 r ) 1 2 + 2 s ! ( + 2 r + 1 ) ! J 2 r 2 s 1 a ( x ) .
To obtain a simplified formula for (44), let
W s , r = = 0 s ( 1 ) + r 1 2 2 s + 4 r 2 + 2 s ! ( + 2 r + 1 ) ! ,
W ¯ s , r = = 0 s ( 1 ) + r + 1 2 ( + s 2 r ) 1 2 + 2 s ! ( + 2 r + 1 ) ! .
We use Zeilberger’s algorithm [55] to find a closed formula for the above two sums. They satisfy the following two recursive formulas:
( s + 1 ) ( 2 s + 1 ) W s + 1 , r 8 ( r 2 s 1 ) ( r 2 s ) W s , r = 0 , W 0 , r = ( 1 ) r ( 2 r + 1 ) ! ,
( s + 1 ) ( 2 s + 3 ) W ¯ s + 1 , r 8 ( r 2 s 2 ) ( r 2 s 1 ) W ¯ s , r = 0 , W ¯ 0 , r = 4 r ( 1 ) r + 1 ( 2 r + 1 ) ! ,
whose solutions are given as follows:
W s , r = ( 1 ) r 4 2 s ( 1 2 s + r ) 2 s ( 2 r + 1 ) ! ( 2 s ) ! ,
W ¯ s , r = 4 2 s + 1 ( 1 ) r + 1 ( 2 s + r ) 2 s + 1 ( 2 r + 1 ) ! ( 2 s + 1 ) ! ,
and accordingly, Formula (44) reduces to Formula (41). This ends the proof. □

4. Moment and Linearization Formulas of the JTPs

This section is confined to presenting a new moment formula for J i a ( x ) . This formula will be the key to developing new linearization formulas for the polynomials J i a ( x ) .

4.1. Moment Formula of the JTPs

Now, we are going to state and prove a new moment formula for the polynomials J i a ( x ) .
Theorem 3. 
Assume that s and i are two non-negative integers. We have
x s J i a ( x ) = 2 2 s r = 0 s ( 1 ) r s r a s r J i + s + r a ( x ) .
Proof. 
We proceed by induction. For s = 0 , it is clear that the formula holds since each side in such a case is equal to J i a ( x ) . Now, assume that Formula (51) is valid, so to prove the inductive step, we have to prove that the following identity holds:
x s + 1 J i a ( x ) = 2 2 s + 2 r = 0 s + 1 ( 1 ) r s + 1 r a s r 1 J i + s + r + 1 a ( x ) .
Now, using the recurrence relation (33) and multiplying both sides of (51) by x, we obtain
x s + 1 J i a ( x ) = 2 2 s + 2 r = 0 s ( 1 ) r + 1 s r a s r 2 J i + s + r + 2 a ( x ) a J i + s + r + 1 a ( x ) ,
that can be written in the following form:
x s + 1 J i a ( x ) = 2 2 s + 2 r = 0 s ( 1 ) r + 1 s r a s r 1 J i + s + r + 1 a ( x ) + 2 2 s + 2 r = 0 s + 1 ( 1 ) r s r 1 a s r 1 J i + s + r + 1 a ( x ) .
If we note the following identity:
s + 1 r = s r + s r 1 ,
then, the following formula can be obtained after performing some simplifications:
x s + 1 J i a ( x ) = 2 2 s + 2 r = 0 s + 1 ( 1 ) r s + 1 r a s r 1 J i + s + r + 1 a ( x ) .
This proves Formula (52). □

4.2. Linearization Formulas Involving the JTPs

This section is interested in developing new linearization formulas involving the JTPs. In this concern, the following linearization formulas will be introduced:
  • The linearization formulas of J i a ( x ) .
  • The product formulas of J i a ( x ) and some celebrated polynomials.
Theorem 4. 
For all non-negative integers r , s , one has the following linearization formulas:
J 2 r a ( x ) J s a ( x ) = π r ! m = 0 r a 2 m F ˜ 2 3 m , 1 2 m , r + 1 1 2 , r + 1 2 m ; 1 ( 2 m ) ! J s + 2 r 2 m a ( x ) m = 0 r 1 a 2 m + 1 F ˜ 2 3 m , m 1 2 , r + 1 1 2 , r 2 m ; 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! J s + 2 r 2 m 1 a ( x ) ,
J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) J s a ( x ) = 1 2 π ( r + 1 ) ! m = 0 r a 2 m + 1 F ˜ 2 3 m , 1 2 m , r + 2 3 2 , r + 1 2 m ; 1 ( 2 m ) ! J s + 2 r 2 m a ( x ) m = 0 r 1 a 2 m + 2 F ˜ 2 3 m , m 1 2 , r + 2 3 2 , r 2 m ; 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! J s + 2 r 2 m 1 a ( x ) ,
where F ˜ 2 3 ( z ) is the regularized hypergeometric function [56].
Proof. 
We will prove (55). The proof of (56) is similar. The analytic formula of J 2 r a ( x ) enables one to write
J 2 r a ( x ) J s a ( x ) = a 2 r = 0 r ( 4 ) r r + r x r J s a ( x ) .
The application of the moment Formula (51) yields
J 2 r a ( x ) J s a ( x ) = a 2 r = 0 r ( 1 ) r r + r m = 0 r ( 1 ) m a m r r m J s + m + r a ( x ) ,
which may be written alternatively after some manipulations in the form
J 2 r a ( x ) J s a ( x ) = m = 0 r a 2 m = 0 m r 2 m + r + r r J s + 2 r 2 m ( x ) m = 0 r 1 a 2 m + 1 = 0 m r 1 + 2 m + r + r r J s + 2 r 2 m 1 a ( x ) ,
which leads to (55). □
Theorem 5. 
Let r and s be two non-negative integers. Let also C s ( x ) be any of the four kinds of CPs. One has the following linearization formulas:
J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) C s ( x ) = 1 8 r a 2 r + 1 ( r + 1 ) × m = 0 r r m F 3 4 m , r 2 + 3 2 , m r , r 2 + 1 1 2 , 3 4 , 5 4 | 1 C r + s 2 m ( x ) + 1 3 ( 1 ) r + 1 2 2 3 r a 2 r + 1 ( r + 2 ) ! m = 0 r 1 1 m ! ( r m 1 ) ! × F 3 4 m , r 2 + 2 , m r + 1 , r 2 + 3 2 5 4 , 3 2 , 7 4 | 1 C r + s 2 m 1 ( x ) ,
J 2 r a ( x ) C s ( x ) = 1 8 r a 2 r m = 0 r r m F 3 4 m , r 2 + 1 , m r , r 2 + 1 2 1 4 , 1 2 , 3 4 | 1 C r + s 2 m ( x ) + ( 1 ) r + 1 2 2 3 r a 2 r ( r + 1 ) ! m = 0 r 1 1 m ! ( r m 1 ) ! × F 3 4 m , r 2 + 3 2 , m r + 1 , r 2 + 1 3 4 , 5 4 , 3 2 | 1 C r + s 2 m 1 ( x ) .
Proof. 
Based on the analytic Formula (27), one can write
J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) C s ( x ) = a 2 r + 1 = 0 r ( 4 ) r ( 1 + + r ) ! ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( r ) ! x r C s ( x ) .
Based on the moment formula of C s ( x ) in (23), Formula (62) can be written as
J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) C s ( x ) = a 2 r + 1 = 0 r ( 8 ) r ( 1 + + r ) ! ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( r ) ! m = 0 r r m C r + s 2 m ,
which may be written again as
J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) C s ( x ) = a 2 r + 1 m = 0 r + s 2 = 0 m ( 8 ) 2 r 2 + r + m ( 2 + r + 1 ) ! ( 2 + r ) ! ( 4 + 1 ) ! C r + s 2 m ( x ) + a 2 r + 1 m = 0 1 2 ( r + s 1 ) = 0 m ( 8 ) 2 r + 1 1 2 + r + m ( 2 + r + 2 ) ! ( 4 + 3 ) ! ( 1 2 + r ) ! C r + s 2 m 1 ( x ) .
The last formula can be written as in (60). Formula (61) can be similarly proved. □
Theorem 6. 
For non-negative integers r and s. The linearization formulas for J r a ( x ) and generalized Fibonacci polynomials are given by
J 2 r a ( x ) F s A , B ( x ) = a 2 r A r m = 0 r 1 4 r ( B ) m r m × F 3 4 m , 1 + r 2 , 1 2 + r 2 , r + m 1 4 , 1 2 , 3 4 | A 2 4 B F r + s 2 m A , B ( x ) + ( 1 ) r + 1 2 1 2 r a 2 r A 1 r ( r + 1 ) ! m = 0 r 1 1 m ! ( r m 1 ) ! ( B ) m × F 3 4 m , 3 2 + r 2 , 1 + r 2 , 1 r + m 3 4 , 5 4 , 3 2 | A 2 4 B F r + s 2 m 1 A , B ( x ) ,
J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) F s A , B ( x ) = 1 4 r a 1 + 2 r A r ( r + 1 ) m = 0 r ( B ) m r m × F 3 4 m , 3 2 + r 2 , 1 + r 2 , r + m 1 2 , 3 4 , 5 4 | A 2 4 B F r + s 2 m A , B ( x ) + 1 3 ( 1 ) r + 1 2 1 2 r a 1 + 2 r A 1 r ( r + 2 ) ! m = 0 r 1 1 m ! ( r m 1 ) ! ( B ) m × F 3 4 m , 2 + r 2 , 3 2 + r 2 , 1 r + m 5 4 , 3 2 , 7 4 | A 2 4 B F r + s 2 m 1 A , B ( x ) .
Proof. 
The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 5. □

5. New Derivative Expressions of the JTPs in Terms of Different Polynomials

This section focuses on developing new expressions for the derivatives of J k a ( x ) . We begin by providing derivative expressions for these polynomials as combinations of their original forms. Additionally, we present alternative expressions for the derivatives in terms of both symmetric and non-symmetric polynomials.

5.1. Derivatives in Terms of Their Original Ones

Theorem 7. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . The derivatives of J k a ( x ) can be expressed as
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = 4 p a 2 p π ( 1 ) p k ! = 0 k p a 2 F ˜ 2 3 , 1 2 , 1 + k 1 2 , 1 + k 2 p | 1 ( 2 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 a ( x ) = 0 k p 1 a 2 + 1 F ˜ 2 3 , 1 2 , 1 + k 1 2 , k 2 p | 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 1 a ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = ( 1 ) p 2 1 2 p π ( k + 1 ) ! = 0 k p a 1 + 2 + 2 p F ˜ 2 3 , 1 2 , 2 + k 3 2 , 1 + k 2 p | 1 ( 2 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 a ( x ) = 0 k p 1 a 2 ( 1 + + p ) F ˜ 2 3 , 1 2 , 2 + k 3 2 , k 2 p | 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 1 a ( x ) .
Proof. 
We prove (67). The analytic form (26) enables one to write
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = a 2 k r = 0 k p ( 4 ) r k ( k + r ) ! ( k p r ) ! ( 2 r ) ! x k r p ,
which may be written in terms of J i a ( x ) using the inversion Formula (41) as
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = a 2 k r = 0 k p ( 1 ) k p r ( 4 ) r k ( k + r ) ! 2 a 2 ( k p r ) ( k p r ) ! ( 2 r ) ! × = 0 k r p a 2 ( 1 + k 2 p r ) 2 ( 2 ) ! J 2 k 2 r 2 p 2 a ( x ) = 0 k r p 1 a 2 + 1 ( k 2 p r ) 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 r 2 p 2 1 a ( x ) .
The last formula can be rearranged to be written as
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = 4 p a 2 p ( 1 ) p = 0 k p a 2 m = 0 ( k + m ) ! ( 2 m ) ! ( 2 2 m ) ! ( k 2 + m p ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 a ( x ) = 0 k p 1 a 2 + 1 m = 0 ( k + m ) ! ( 2 m ) ! ( 2 2 m + 1 ) ! ( k 2 + m p 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 1 a ( x ) ,
which may be written alternatively as in (67). Formula (68) can be similarly proved. □

5.2. Derivatives of Jacobsthal Polynomials in Terms of Non-Symmetric Polynomials

In this part, we will find a general expression for the derivatives of J k a ( x ) in terms of any non-symmetric polynomial. In addition, some specific derivative expressions are given.
Theorem 8. 
If we consider any non-symmetric polynomial ψ i ( x ) expressed as in (15), then for all non-negative integers p and k with k p , we have the following two derivative expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = m = 0 k p R m , k ψ k p m ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = m = 0 k p R ¯ m , k ψ k p m ( x ) ,
where
R m , k = a 2 k r = 0 m ( 4 ) r k k + r k r ( 1 + k p r ) p F ¯ m r , k r p ,
R ¯ m , k = a 2 k + 1 r = 0 m ( 4 ) r k k + r + 1 k r ( 1 + k p r ) p F ¯ m r , k r p ,
and F ¯ , m are the inversion coefficients appear in (17).
Proof. 
We start from Formula (69), and after that, apply the inversion formula in (17) to obtain the following formula:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = a 2 k r = 0 k p ( 4 ) r k k + r k r ( 1 + k p r ) p t = 0 k r p F ¯ t , k r p ψ k r p t ( x ) ,
which can be arranged to give the following formula:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = a 2 k m = 0 k p r = 0 m ( 4 ) r k k + r k r ( 1 + k p r ) p F ¯ m r , k r p ψ k p m ( x ) .
This proves (72). Formula (73) can be similarly proved. □
As a result of Theorem 8, we will present some derivative formulas for the JTPs as combinations of specific non-symmetric polynomials. The following corollaries display these results.
Corollary 1. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . In terms of the shifted Jacobi polynomials R ˜ ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) , the derivatives D p J k a ( x ) have the following expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = 1 4 k a 2 k Γ ( 1 + k p + γ ) k ! Γ ( 1 + ρ ) × m = 0 k p ( 1 + 2 k 2 m 2 p + ρ + γ ) Γ ( 1 + k m p + ρ ) Γ ( 1 + k m p + ρ + γ ) m ! ( k m p ) ! Γ ( 1 + k m p + γ ) Γ ( 2 + 2 k m 2 p + ρ + γ ) × F 2 3 m , 1 + k , 1 2 k + m + 2 p ρ γ 1 2 , k + p γ | 1 R ˜ k p m ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = 1 4 k a 2 k + 1 Γ ( 1 + k p + γ ) ( k + 1 ) ! Γ ( 1 + ρ ) × m = 0 k p ( 1 + 2 k 2 m 2 p + ρ + γ ) Γ ( 1 + k m p + ρ ) Γ ( 1 + k m p + ρ + γ ) m ! ( k m p ) ! Γ ( 1 + k m p + γ ) Γ ( 2 + 2 k m 2 p + ρ + γ ) × F 2 3 m , 2 + k , 1 2 k + m + 2 p ρ γ 3 2 , k + p γ | 1 R ˜ k p m ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) .
Proof. 
Based on Theorem 8 along with the inversion coefficients of R ˜ ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) in the first row and last column of Table 2. □
Corollary 2. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . In terms of Schröder polynomials, D p J 2 k a ( x ) have the following expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = 4 k a 2 k ( 1 + k p ) ! k ! m = 0 k p ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 + 2 k 2 m 2 p ) m ! ( 1 + 2 k m 2 p ) ! × F 2 3 m , 1 + k , 1 2 k + m + 2 p 1 2 , 1 k + p | 1 S k p m ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = 4 k a 1 + 2 k ( k + 1 ) ! ( 1 + k p ) ! m = 0 k p ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 + 2 k 2 m 2 p ) m ! ( 1 + 2 k m 2 p ) ! × F 2 3 m , 2 + k , 1 2 k + m + 2 p 3 2 , 1 k + p | 1 S k p m ( x ) .
Proof. 
Based on Theorem 8 along with the inversion coefficients of S ( x ) in the second row and last column of Table 2. □
Corollary 3. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . In terms of Bernoulli polynomials, D p J 2 k a ( x ) have the following expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = 1 4 k a 2 k π Γ 1 2 k m = 0 k p k ! Γ 1 2 k + m + ( 1 ) m Γ 1 2 k ( 1 + k + m ) ! Γ 3 2 + m ( m + 1 ) ! ( k m p ) ! B k p m ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = a 2 k + 1 π m = 0 k p 4 2 k + m ( 2 k + 2 ) ! Γ 1 2 k + m + ( 1 ) m + k 4 1 + k π ( 2 + k + m ) ! ( 2 m + 3 ) ! ( k m p ) ! B k p m ( x ) .
Proof. 
By applying Theorem 8 using the inversion coefficients of B m ( x ) in the third row and last column of Table 2. □

5.3. Derivatives of Jacobsthal Polynomials in Terms of Symmetric Polynomials

In this part, we will find a general expression for the derivatives of J k a ( x ) in terms of any symmetric polynomial. In addition, some specific derivatives of the JTPs in terms of symmetric polynomials are given.
Theorem 9. 
If we consider any symmetric polynomial ϕ i ( x ) expressed as in (14), then for any non-negative integers p and k with k p , then we have the following two derivative expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = m = 0 k p 2 M m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m ( x ) + m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) r = 0 m M ¯ m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m 1 ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = m = 0 k p 2 W m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m ( x ) + m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) r = 0 m W ¯ m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m 1 ( x ) ,
where
M m , k , p = a 2 k r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r ( k + 2 r ) ! ( k p 2 r ) ! ( 4 r ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p ,
M ¯ m , k , p = a 2 k r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r 1 ( k + 2 r + 1 ) ! ( k p 2 r 1 ) ! ( 4 r + 2 ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p 1 ,
W m , k , p = a 2 k + 1 r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r ( 1 + k + 2 r ) ! ( 1 + k p 2 r ) p ( k 2 r ) ! ( 1 + 4 r ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p ,
W ¯ m , k , p = a 2 k + 1 r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r 1 ( 2 + k + 2 r ) ! ( k p 2 r ) p ( k 2 r 1 ) ! ( 3 + 4 r ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p 1 .
and H ¯ , m are the inversion coefficients of ϕ i ( x ) appear in (16).
Proof. 
The proofs of (84) and (85) are similar. We prove (85). Starting from Formula (69), and making use of the inversion formula of ϕ k ( x ) in (16), we get
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = a 2 k + 1 r = 0 k p 1 4 k r ( 1 + k + r ) ! ( 1 + k p r ) p ( k r ) ! ( 2 r + 1 ) ! t = 0 1 2 ( k r p ) H ¯ t , k r p ϕ k r p 2 t ( x ) .
The following formula is the result of some manipulations:
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = a 2 k + 1 m = 0 k p 2 r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r ( k + 1 + 2 r ) ! ( k + 1 p 2 r ) p ( k 2 r ) ! ( 4 r + 1 ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p ϕ k p 2 m ( x ) + a 2 k + 1 m = 0 k p 1 2 r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r 1 ( k + 2 + 2 r ) ! ( k p 2 r ) p ( k 2 r 1 ) ! ( 4 r + 3 ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p 1 ϕ k p 2 m 1 ( x ) .
Similarly, we can show that
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = a 2 k m = 0 k p 2 r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r ( k + 2 r ) ! ( k p 2 r ) ! ( 4 r ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p ϕ k p 2 m ( x ) + a 2 k m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) r = 0 m 1 4 k 2 r 1 ( k + 2 r + 1 ) ! ( k p 2 r 1 ) ! ( 4 r + 2 ) ! H ¯ m r , k 2 r p 1 ϕ k p 2 m 1 ( x ) .
The two Formulas (91), and (92) can be written as:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = m = 0 k p 2 M m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m ( x ) + m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) M ¯ m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m 1 ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = m = 0 k p 2 W m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m ( x ) + m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) W ¯ m , k , p ϕ k p 2 m 1 ( x ) ,
where the coefficients M m , k , p , M ¯ m , k , p , W m , k , p , W ¯ m , k , p are given, respectively, as in (86)–(89). This proves Theorem 9. □
In the following, we give two expressions for the derivatives of the JTPs in terms of the ultraspherical and Hermite polynomials as applications of Theorem 9.
Corollary 4. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . In terms of the ultraspherical polynomials C i ( γ ) ( x ) , the derivatives D p J k a ( x ) have the following expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = ( 1 ) k 2 1 3 k + p 2 γ a 2 k π k ! Γ 1 2 + γ m = 0 k p 2 ( k 2 m p + γ ) Γ ( k 2 m p + 2 γ ) m ! ( k 2 m p ) ! Γ ( 1 + k m p + γ ) × F 3 4 m , 1 2 + k 2 , 1 + k 2 , k + m + p γ 1 4 , 1 2 , 3 4 | 1 C k p 2 m ( γ ) ( x ) + ( 1 ) 1 + k 2 3 3 k + p 2 γ a 2 k π ( 1 + k ) ! Γ 1 2 + γ × m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) ( 1 + k 2 m p + γ ) Γ ( 1 + k 2 m p + 2 γ ) m ! ( 1 + k 2 m p ) ! Γ ( k m p + γ ) × F 3 4 m , 1 + k 2 , 3 2 + k 2 , 1 k + m + p γ 3 4 , 5 4 , 3 2 | 1 C k p 2 m 1 ( γ ) ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = ( 1 ) k 2 1 3 k + p 2 γ a 1 + 2 k π ( 1 + k ) ! Γ 1 2 + γ m = 0 k p 2 ( k 2 m p + γ ) Γ ( k 2 m p + 2 γ ) m ! ( k 2 m p ) ! Γ ( 1 + k m p + γ ) × F 3 4 m , 1 + k 2 , 3 2 + k 2 , k + m + p γ 1 2 , 3 4 , 5 4 | 1 C k p 2 m ( γ ) ( x ) + ( 1 ) k + 1 2 3 3 k + p 2 γ a 1 + 2 k π ( 2 + k ) ! 3 Γ 1 2 + γ × m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) ( 1 + k 2 m p + γ ) Γ ( 1 + k 2 m p + 2 γ ) m ! ( 1 + k 2 m p ) ! Γ ( k m p + γ ) × F 3 4 m , 3 2 + k 2 , 2 + k 2 , 1 k + m + p γ 5 4 , 3 2 , 7 4 | 1 C k p 2 m 1 ( γ ) ( x ) .
Proof. 
By applying Theorem 9 using the inversion coefficients of C ( γ ) ( x ) in the first row, last column of Table 3. □
Corollary 5. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . In terms of Hermite polynomials H ( x ) , the derivatives D p J k a ( x ) have the following expressions:
D p J 2 k a ( x ) = ( 1 ) k 2 3 k + p a 2 k k ! m = 0 k p 2 1 m ! ( k 2 m p ) ! × F 3 3 m , 1 2 + k 2 , 1 + k 2 1 4 , 1 2 , 3 4 | 1 H k p 2 m ( x ) + ( 1 ) 1 + k 2 2 3 k + p a 2 k ( k + 1 ) ! m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) 1 m ! ( k 2 m p 1 ) ! × F 3 3 m , 1 + k 2 , 3 2 + k 2 3 4 , 5 4 , 3 2 | 1 H k p 2 m 1 ( x ) ,
D p J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) = ( 1 ) k 2 3 k + p a 1 + 2 k ( k + 1 ) ! m = 0 k p 2 1 m ! ( k 2 m p ) ! × F 3 3 m , 1 + k 2 , 3 2 + k 2 1 2 , 3 4 , 5 4 | 1 H k p 2 m ( x ) + 1 3 ( 1 ) k + 1 2 2 3 k + p a 1 + 2 k ( k + 2 ) ! m = 0 1 2 ( k p 1 ) 1 m ! ( k 2 m p 1 ) ! × F 3 3 m , 3 2 + k 2 , 2 + k 2 5 4 , 3 2 , 7 4 | 1 H k p 2 m 1 ( x ) .
Proof. 
By applying Theorem 9 using the inversion coefficients of H ( x ) in the second row, last column of Table 3. □

6. Derivatives of Different Polynomials in Terms of the JTPs

This section is confined to presenting new derivative expressions for various polynomials as combinations of the JTPs.

6.1. Derivatives of Non-Symmetric Polynomials in Terms of Jacobsthal Polynomials

We give a general theorem in which we express the derivatives of any non-symmetric polynomial represented as (15) in terms of the JTPs.
Theorem 10. 
Consider any symmetric polynomial ψ k ( x ) . In addition, consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . We have
D p ψ k ( x ) = t = 0 k p a 2 ( k + t + p ) × m = 0 t F m , k ( 1 + k m p ) p ( 1 ) k m p 2 2 ( k m p ) ( 1 + k + m 2 t p ) 2 m + 2 t ( 2 t 2 m ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 t a ( x ) + t = 0 k p 1 a 1 2 k + 2 t + 2 p m = 0 t F m , k ( 1 + k m p ) p ( 1 ) 1 + k m p 2 2 ( k m p ) ( k + m 2 t p ) 1 2 m + 2 t ( 2 t 2 m + 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 t 1 a ( x ) ,
where F m , k are the power form coefficients given in the second column of Table 2.
Proof. 
If we consider the power form representation in (15), then we can write
D p ψ k ( x ) = r = 0 k p F r , k ( k r p + 1 ) p x k r p .
If the inversion Formula (41) is applied, then the last formula transforms into the following form:
D p ψ k ( x ) = r = 0 k p F r , k ( 1 + k p r ) p × t = 0 k r p ( 1 ) k p r 2 2 ( k p r ) a 2 ( k + t + p + r ) ( 1 + k 2 t p r ) 2 t ( 2 t ) ! J 2 k 2 r 2 p 2 t a ( x ) + t = 0 k r p 1 ( 1 ) 1 + k p r 2 2 ( k p r ) a 1 2 k + 2 t + 2 p + 2 r ( k 2 t p r ) 1 + 2 t ( 2 t + 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 r 2 p 2 t 1 a ( x ) .
Some tedious manipulations on the right-hand side of the last formula enable one to write (100) in the following form
D p ψ k ( x ) = t = 0 k p a 2 ( k + t + p ) × m = 0 t F m , k ( 1 + k m p ) p ( 1 ) k m p 2 2 ( k m p ) ( 1 + k + m 2 t p ) 2 m + 2 t ( 2 t 2 m ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 t a ( x ) + t = 0 k p 1 a 1 2 k + 2 t + 2 p m = 0 t F m , k ( 1 + k m p ) p ( 1 ) 1 + k m p 2 2 ( k m p ) ( k + m 2 t p ) 1 2 m + 2 t ( 2 t 2 m + 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 2 t 1 a ( x ) .
This completes the proof. □
The following corollary gives an application to Theorem 10. The formula expressing the Jacobi polynomials’ derivatives in terms of the JTPs is given.
Corollary 6. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . The following expression holds:
D p R ˜ k ( γ , ρ ) ( x ) = t = 0 k p V t , k , p J 2 k 2 p 2 t a ( x ) + t = 0 k p 1 V ¯ t , k , b J 2 k 2 p 2 t 1 a ( x ) ,
where
V t , k , p = ( 1 ) k p 2 2 ( k p ) a 2 ( k + p + t ) k ! Γ ( 1 + γ ) Γ ( 1 + 2 k + γ + ρ ) ( k p 1 2 t ) ! ( 2 t ) ! k ! Γ ( 1 + k + γ + ρ ) × F 2 3 t , 1 2 t , k ρ 1 + k p 2 t , 2 k γ ρ | 1 ,
V ¯ t , k , p = ( 1 ) 1 + k p 2 2 ( k p ) a 1 2 k + 2 p + 2 t Γ ( 1 + k ) Γ ( 1 + γ ) Γ ( 1 + 2 k + γ + ρ ) Γ ( k p 2 t ) Γ ( 2 ( 1 + t ) ) Γ ( 1 + k + γ ) Γ ( 1 + k + γ + ρ ) × F 2 3 t , 1 2 t , k ρ k p 2 t , 2 k γ ρ | 1 .
Proof. 
Direct application of Theorem 10 considering the power form coefficients of R ˜ k ( γ , ρ ) ( x ) in the first row, second column of Table 2. □

6.2. Derivatives of Symmetric Polynomials in Terms of the JTPs

Theorem 11. 
Consider any symmetric polynomial ϕ k ( x ) . For all non-negative integers k , p with k p , the following derivative expression for ϕ k ( x ) is valid:
D p ϕ k ( x ) = ( 1 ) k p t = 0 k p 2 a 2 k + 2 p + 4 t m = 0 t 2 2 ( k 2 m p ) ( k 2 m ) ! H m , k ( 4 t 4 m ) ! ( k + 2 m p 4 t ) ! J 2 k 2 p 4 t a ( x ) + ( 1 ) 1 + k p t = 0 k p 2 a 1 2 k + 2 p + 4 t m = 0 t 2 2 ( k 2 m p ) ( k 2 m ) ! H m , k ( 4 t 4 m + 1 ) ! ( k + 2 m p 4 t 1 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 4 t 1 a ( x ) + ( 1 ) k p t = 0 k p 2 1 a 2 2 k + 2 p + 4 t m = 0 t 2 2 ( k 2 m p ) ( k 2 m ) ! H m , k ( 4 t 4 m + 2 ) ! ( k + 2 m p 4 t 2 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 4 t 2 a ( x ) + ( 1 ) 1 + k p t = 0 k p 2 1 a 3 2 k + 2 p + 4 t m = 0 t 2 2 ( k 2 m p ) ( k 2 m ) ! H m , k ( 4 t 4 m + 3 ) ! ( k + 2 m p 4 t 3 ) ! J 2 k 2 p 4 t 3 a ( x ) ,
where H m , k are the power form coefficients given in the second column of Table 3.
Proof. 
The analytic form of a symmetric polynomial given in (14) allows one to write
D p ϕ k ( x ) = r = 0 k p 2 H r , k ( 1 + k p 2 r ) p x k 2 r p .
The inversion formula of the JTPs allows one to convert the last formula into the following one:
D p ϕ k ( x ) = r = 0 k p 2 H r , k ( 1 ) k p 2 2 ( k p 2 r ) ( 1 + k p 2 r ) p × t = 0 k 2 r p a 2 ( k + p + 2 r + t ) ( 1 + k p 2 r 2 t ) 2 t ( 2 t ) ! J 2 k 4 r 2 p 2 t a ( x ) t = 0 k 2 r p 1 a 1 2 k + 2 p + 4 r + 2 t ( k p 2 ( r + t ) ) 1 + 2 t ( 2 t + 1 ) ! J 2 k 4 r 2 p 2 t 1 a ( x ) .
Some tedious computations lead to the formula in (105). □
As an application to Theorem 11, the derivatives of the ultraspherical polynomials can be expressed in terms of the JTPs as in the following corollary.
Corollary 7. 
Consider the two non-negative integers k and p with k p . The derivatives of the ultraspherical polynomials can be expressed in terms of J k a ( x ) as follows:
D p C k ( γ ) ( x ) = t = 0 k p 2 Q 1 , t , k , p J 2 k 2 p 4 t a ( x ) + t = 0 k p 2 Q 2 , t , k , p J 2 k 2 p 4 t 1 a ( x ) + t = 0 k p 2 1 Q 3 , t , k , p J 2 k 2 p 4 t 2 a ( x ) + t = 0 k p 2 1 Q 4 , t , k , p J 2 k 2 p 4 t 3 a ( x ) ,
where
Q 1 , t , k , p = ( 1 ) k p 2 1 + 3 k 2 p + 2 γ a 2 k + 2 p + 4 t k ! Γ 1 2 + γ Γ ( k + γ ) π ( k p 4 t ) ! ( 4 t ) ! Γ ( k + 2 γ ) × F 3 4 t , 1 4 t , 1 2 t , 3 4 t 1 2 + k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 + k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 k γ | 1 Q 2 , t , k , p = ( 1 ) 1 + k p 2 1 + 3 k 2 p + 2 γ a 1 2 k + 2 p + 4 t k ! Γ 1 2 + γ Γ ( k + γ ) π ( k p 4 t 1 ) ! ( 4 t + 1 ) ! Γ ( k + 2 γ ) × F 3 4 t , 1 4 t , 1 4 t , 1 2 t k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 2 + k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 k γ | 1 Q 3 , t , k , p = ( 1 ) k p 2 1 + 3 k 2 p + 2 γ a 2 2 k + 2 p + 4 t k ! Γ 1 2 + γ Γ ( k + γ ) π ( k p 4 t 2 ) ! ( 4 t + 2 ) ! Γ ( k + 2 γ ) × F 3 4 t , 1 2 t , 1 4 t , 1 4 t 1 2 + k 2 p 2 2 t , k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 k γ | 1 Q 4 , t , k , p = ( 1 ) 1 + k p 2 1 + 3 k 2 p + 2 γ a 3 2 k + 2 p + 4 t k ! Γ 1 2 + γ Γ ( k + γ ) π ( k p 4 t 3 ) ! ( 4 t + 3 ) ) ! Γ ( k + 2 γ ) × F 3 4 t , 3 4 t , 1 2 t , 1 4 t 1 + k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 2 + k 2 p 2 2 t , 1 k γ | 1
Proof. 
Direct application of Theorem 11 considering the power form coefficients C k ( γ ) ( x ) in the first row and second column of Table 3. □

7. Some Definite Integrals

This section is confined to deducing closed formulas for some definite integrals of the Jacobsthal polynomials, their moments, and their linearization formula.
Corollary 8. 
The following integral formula holds:
0 1 J i a ( x ) d x = 4 i + 2 1 2 i 1 .
Proof. 
The following two formulas can be proved:
0 1 J 2 k a ( x ) d x = 4 k a 2 k 2 2 k + 1 1 k + 1 ,
0 1 J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) d x = 4 k a 2 k + 1 4 k + 1 1 2 k + 3 .
The proof of the two formulas is similar. We prove Formula (111). The proof is based on the connection formula with Bernoulli polynomials that can be deduced from (83) by setting q = 0 . Thus, integrating both sides from 0 to 1, we obtain
0 1 J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) d x = a 2 k + 1 m = 0 k 4 2 k + m ( 2 k + 2 ) ! Γ 1 2 k + m + ( 1 ) m + k 4 k + 1 π ( k + m + 2 ) ! π ( 2 m + 3 ) ! ( k m ) ! × 0 1 B k m ( x ) d x .
If we note the identity:
0 1 B k ( x ) d x = 1 , k = 0 , 0 , k > 0 ,
then it is easy to reduce the above formula to
0 1 J 2 k + 1 a ( x ) d x = 4 k a 2 k + 1 4 k + 1 1 2 k + 3 .
This proves (111). Formula (110) can be similarly proved from the connection formula that can be obtained from (82) setting q = 0 . □
Corollary 9. 
For all non-negative integers m and k, one has
0 1 x m J k a ( x ) d x = 2 2 m a i r = 0 m 2 ( 1 ) r 2 2 i m r m r 2 + i + m + r .
Proof. 
From the moment formula, it can be shown that
0 1 x m J k a ( x ) d x = 2 2 m r = 0 m ( 1 ) r m r a m r 0 1 J i + m + r a ( x ) d x .
Based on Formula (109), the last formula can be converted into
0 1 x m J k a ( x ) d x = 2 2 m a i r = 0 m 2 ( 1 ) r 2 2 i m r m r 2 + i + m + r .
This proves Corollary 9. □
Corollary 10. 
Consider any two non-negative integers r and s, the following linearization formula holds:
0 1 J r a ( x ) J s a ( x ) d x = m = 0 r 2 U m , r + m = 0 r 2 1 U ¯ m , r ,
where U m , r and U ¯ m , r are given as follows:
U m , r = H m , r , if r is even , Z m , r , if r is odd ,
U ¯ m , r = H ¯ m , r , if r is even , Z ¯ m , r , if r is odd .
with
H m , r = 4 2 1 + 2 m r s a r + s π r 2 ! ( 2 2 m + r + s ) ( 2 m ) ! F ˜ 2 3 m , 1 + r 2 , 1 2 m 1 2 , 1 2 m + r 2 | 1 ,
H ¯ m , r = 4 1 2 2 m r s a r + s π r 2 ! ( 1 2 m + r + s ) ( 2 m + 1 ) ! F ˜ 2 3 m , 1 + r 2 , 1 2 m 1 2 , 2 m + r 2 | 1 ,
Z m , r = 2 1 2 2 m r s a r + s π r + 1 2 ! ( 1 2 m + r + s ) ( 2 m ) ! F ˜ 2 3 m , r + 3 2 , 1 2 m 3 2 , 1 2 ( 1 4 m + r ) | 1 ,
Z ¯ m , r = 4 2 3 + 2 m r s a r + s π r + 1 2 ! 2 ( 2 m + r + s ) ( 2 m + 1 ) ! F ˜ 2 3 m , r + 3 2 , 1 2 m 3 2 , 1 2 ( 1 4 m + r ) | 1 .
Proof. 
Integrating both sides of the linearization formulas in (60), and (61) leads, respectively, to the following integral formulas:
0 1 J 2 r a ( x ) J s a ( x ) d x = π r ! m = 0 r a 2 m ( 2 m ) ! F ˜ 2 3 m , 1 + r , 1 2 m 1 2 , 1 + r 2 m | 1 G s + 2 r 2 m
m = 0 r 1 a 2 m + 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) ! F ˜ 2 3 m , 1 + r , 1 2 m 1 2 , r 2 m | 1 G s + 2 r 2 m 1 ,
0 1 J 2 r + 1 a ( x ) J s a ( x ) d x = 1 2 π ( r + 1 ) ! m = 0 r a 2 m + 1 ( 2 m ) ! F ˜ 2 3 2 + r , 1 2 m , m 3 2 , 1 + r 2 m | 1 G s + 2 r 2 m
m = 0 r 1 a 2 + 2 m ( 2 m + 1 ) ! F ˜ 2 3 2 + r , 1 2 m , m 3 2 , r 2 m | 1 G s + 2 r 2 m 1 ,
where
G i = 0 1 J i a ( x ) d x = 4 i + 2 1 2 i 1 .
The above two formulas can be merged to give Formula (115). □
Remark 10. 
The formula that evaluates the integrals 0 1 J r a ( x ) 2 d x can be obtained as a special case of Formula (115).
Corollary 11. 
For the two positive integers i and j, the following integral formula holds:
0 1 J 2 i a ( x ) F j A , B ( x ) d x = 1 4 A i a 2 i p = 0 i ( B ) p i p × F 3 4 p , 1 2 + i 2 , 1 + i 2 , i + p 1 4 , 1 2 , 3 4 | A 2 4 B I i + j 2 p A , B ( x ) + ( 1 ) 1 + i 2 1 2 i a 2 i A 1 i ( i + 1 ) ! p = 0 i 1 ( B ) p p ! ( i p 1 ) ! × F 3 4 p , 1 + i 2 , 3 2 + i 2 , 1 i + p 3 4 , 5 4 , 3 2 | A 2 4 B I i + j 2 p 1 A , B ,
0 1 J 2 i + 1 a ( x ) F j A , B ( x ) d x = 1 4 i a 1 + 2 i A i ( i + 1 ) p = 0 i ( B ) p i p × F 3 4 p , 1 + i 2 , 3 2 + i 2 , i + p 1 2 , 3 4 , 5 4 | A 2 4 B I i + j 2 p A , B + 1 3 ( 1 ) i + 1 2 1 2 i a 1 + 2 i A 1 i ( i + 2 ) ! p = 0 i 1 ( B ) p ( i p 1 ) ! p ! × F 3 4 p , 3 2 + i 2 , 2 + i 2 , 1 i + p 5 4 , 3 2 , 7 4 | A 2 4 B I i + j 2 p 1 A , B ,
where I j A , B is given by [57]
I j A , B = 0 1 F j A , B ( x ) d x = A j j + 1 F 1 2 1 2 j 2 , j 2 j | 4 B A 2 , j even , 2 B j + 1 2 A ( j + 1 ) + A j j + 1 F 1 2 1 2 j 2 , j 2 j | 4 B A 2 , j odd .
Proof. 
The above two integral formulas are direct consequences of the two linearization Formulas (65), and (66) along with Formula (127). □

8. Conclusions

This paper presented novel results on a certain class of the JTPs. Some new formulas concerning these polynomials were developed. Derivative expression formulas for these polynomials were established as combinations of the different polynomials. The inverse derivatives formulas were also developed. The pivotal formula was the expression of the shifted CPs of the third in terms of the generalized Jacobsthal polynomials, which led to a new inversion formula of these polynomials. Most of the formulas in this paper are new and may be employed in numerical analysis and approximation theory. In future work, we aim to investigate other generalized sequences of polynomials and utilize them to solve several differential equations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.M.A.-E.; Methodology, W.M.A.-E., O.M.A. and A.K.A.; Software, W.M.A.-E. and A.K.A.; Formal analysis, W.M.A.-E., O.M.A. and A.K.A.; Validation, W.M.A.-E., O.M.A. and A.K.A.; Writing – original draft, W.M.A.-E., O.M.A. and A.K.A.; Writing—review & editing, W.M.A.-E., O.M.A. and A.K.A.; Supervision, W.M.A.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia, Grant Code: (22UQU4331287DSR02).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code: (22UQU4331287DSR02).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fan, H.Y.; He, R.; Da, C.; Liang, Z.F. Optical field’s quadrature excitation studied by new Hermite-polynomial operator identity. Chin. Phys. B 2013, 22, 080301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fakhri, H.; Mojaveri, B. The remarkable properties of the associated Romanovski functions. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2011, 44, 195205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nikiforov, F.; Uvarov, V.B. Special Functions of Mathematical Physics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; Volume 205. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu, R.; Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Ma, Y. Probabilistic degenerate Fubini polynomials associated with random variables. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 2024, 31, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Kwon, J. Probabilistic degenerate Stirling polynomials of the second kind and their applications. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 2024, 30, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aceto, L.; Malonek, H.; Tomaz, G. A unified matrix approach to the representation of Appell polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2015, 26, 426–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dattoli, G. Generalized polynomials, operational identities and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 118, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Alqubori, O.M.; Napoli, A. On convolved Fibonacci polynomials. Mathematics 2024, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pathan, M.; Khan, W.A. A new class of generalized polynomials associated with Hermite and Euler polynomials. Mediterr. J. Math. 2016, 13, 913–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Isah, A. Poly-Genocchi polynomials and its applications. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 8221–8238. [Google Scholar]
  11. Costabile, F.; Gualtieri, M.; Napoli, A. Recurrence relations and determinant forms for general polynomial sequences. Application to Genocchi polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2019, 30, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nalli, A.; Haukkanen, P. On generalized Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009, 42, 3179–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Alqubori, O.M. New results of unified Chebyshev polynomials. AIMS Math. 2024, 9, 20058–20088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dehghani, A.; Mojaveri, B.; Mahdian, M. New even and odd coherent states attached to the Hermite polynomials. Rep. Math. Phys. 2015, 75, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, H.Y.; Jiang, T.F. Two-variable Hermite polynomials as time-evolutional transition amplitude for driven harmonic oscillator. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2007, 21, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahmed, H.M. Numerical solutions of Korteweg-de Vries and Korteweg-de Vries-Burger’s equations in a Bernstein polynomial basis. Mediterr. J. Math. 2019, 16, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haq, S.; Ali, I. Approximate solution of two-dimensional Sobolev equation using a mixed Lucas and Fibonacci polynomials. Eng. Comput. 2022, 38, 2059–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Alqubori, O.M.; Atta, A.G. A collocation approach for the nonlinear fifth-order KdV equations using certain shifted Horadam polynomials. Mathematics 2025, 13, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Partohaghighi, M.; Hashemi, M.S.; Mirzazadeh, M.; El Din, S.M. Numerical method for fractional advection–dispersion equation using shifted Vieta–Lucas polynomials. Results Phys. 2023, 52, 106756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Osman, M.S.; Samet, B. A wavelet based numerical scheme for fractional order SEIR epidemic of measles by using Genocchi polynomials. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 2021, 37, 1250–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Izadi, M.; Sene, N.; Adel, W.; El-Mesady, A. The Layla and Majnun mathematical model of fractional order: Stability analysis and numerical study. Results Phys. 2023, 51, 106650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ahmed, H.M. Numerical solutions for singular Lane-Emden equations using shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. Contemp. Math. 2023, 4, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gamal, M.; Zaky, M.A.; El-Kady, M.; Abdelhakem, M. Chebyshev polynomial derivative-based spectral tau approach for solving high-order differential equations. Comput. Appl. Math. 2024, 43, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Izadi, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Srivastava, H.M. A highly accurate and efficient Genocchi-based spectral technique applied to singular fractional order boundary value problems. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2025, 48, 905–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adel, M.; Khader, M.M.; Algelany, S. High-dimensional chaotic Lorenz system: Numerical treatment using Changhee polynomials of the Appell type. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gasper, G. Linearization of the product of Jacobi polynomials. I. Canad. J. Math. 1970, 22, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sánchez-Ruiz, J.; Dehesa, J.S. Some connection and linearization problems for polynomials in and beyond the Askey scheme. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2001, 133, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Popov, B.S.; Srivastava, H.M. Linearization of a product of two polynomials of different orthogonal systems. Facta Univ. Ser. Math. Inform. 2003, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Srivastava, H.M.; Niukkanen, A.W. Some Clebsch-Gordan type linearization relations and associated families of Dirichlet integrals. Math. Comput. Model. 2003, 37, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Abd-Elhameed, W.M. New product and linearization formulae of Jacobi polynomials of certain parameters. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2015, 26, 586–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ahmed, H.M. Computing expansions coefficients for Laguerre polynomials. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2021, 32, 271–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abd-Elhameed, W.M. Novel expressions for the derivatives of sixth kind Chebyshev polynomials: Spectral solution of the non-linear one-dimensional Burgers’ equation. Fractal Fract. 2021, 5, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, D.; Chu, W. Sums of Pell/Lucas Polynomials and Fibonacci/Lucas Numbers. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nalli, A.; Haukkanen, P. On the generalized Fibonacci and Lucas matrix Hybrinomials. Filomat 2024, 38, 9779–9794. [Google Scholar]
  35. Soykan, Y. A study on generalized Fibonacci polynomials: Sum formulas. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 2022, 10, 39–118. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ma, R.; Zhang, W. Several identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2007, 45, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Falcon, S.; Plaza, A. On k-Fibonacci sequences and polynomials and their derivatives. Chaos Soliton Fract. 2009, 39, 1005–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, L.; Wang, X. The power sums involving Fibonacci polynomials and their applications. Symmetry 2019, 11, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Özkan, E.; Altun, İ. Generalized Lucas polynomials and relationships between the Fibonacci polynomials and Lucas polynomials. Commun. Algebra 2019, 47, 4020–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Amdeberhan, T.; Chen, X.; Moll, V.H.; Sagan, B.E. Generalized Fibonacci polynomials and Fibonomial coefficients. Ann. Comb. 2014, 18, 541–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koshy, T. Infinite sums involving Jacobsthal polynomials: Generalizations. Fibonacci Q. 2023, 61, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Koshy, T. Products Involving Reciprocals of Jacobsthal Polynomials. Fibonacci Q. 2022, 60, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Koshy, T. Infinite sums involving Jacobsthal polynomial products. Fibonacci Q. 2021, 59, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Djordjevic, G.B. Derivative sequences of generalized Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal-Lucas polynomials. Fibonacci Q. 2000, 38, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cerda-Morales, G. On third-order Jacobsthal polynomials and their properties. Miskolc Math. Notes 2021, 22, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Koshy, T. Infinite sums involving Jacobsthal polynomials Revisited. Fibonacci Q. 2022, 60, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Koshy, T.; Gao, Z. Sums involving a class of Jacobsthal polynomial Squares. Fibonacci Q. 2024, 62, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saba, N.; Boussayoud, A.; Ferkioui, M.; Boughaba, S. Symmetric functions of binary products of Gaussian Jacobsthal Lucas polynomials and Chebyshev polynomials. Palest. J. Math. 2021, 10, 452. [Google Scholar]
  49. Erdağ, Ö.; Peters, J.F.; Deveci, Ö. The Jacobsthal–Padovan–Fibonacci p-sequence and its application in the concise representation of vibrating systems with dual proximal groups. J. Supercomput. 2025, 81, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saba, N.; Boussayoud, A. Gaussian (p, q)-Jacobsthal and Gaussian (p, q)-Jacobsthal Lucas numbers and their some interesting properties. J. Math. Phys. 2022, 63, 112704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Horadam, A.F. Extension of a synthesis for a class of polynomial sequences. Fibonacci Q. 1996, 34, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Djordjevic, G.B.; Milovanovic, G.M. Special Classes of Polynomials; University of Nis, Faculty of Technology Leskovac: Niš, Serbia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tereszkiewicz, A.; Wawreniuk, I. Generalized Jacobsthal polynomials and special points for them. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 268, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Al-Harbi, M.S.; Amin, A.K.; Ahmed, H.M. Spectral treatment of high-order Emden–Fowler equations based on modified Chebyshev polynomials. Axioms 2023, 12, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koepf, W. Hypergeometric Summation, 2nd ed.; Universitext Series; Springer: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bell, W.W. Special Functions for Scientists and Engineers; Courier Corporation: North Chelmsford, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  57. Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Amin, A.K. Novel identities of Bernoulli polynomials involving closed forms for some definite integrals. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Some special classes of the two sequences.
Table 1. Some special classes of the two sequences.
p ( x ) p ¯ ( x ) q ( x ) q ¯ ( x ) W n ( x ) w n ( x )
x1Fibonacci polynomial F n ( x ) Lucas polynomial L n ( x )
2 x 1Pell polynomial P n ( x ) Pell–Lucas polynomial Q n ( x )
1 2 x Jacobsthal polynomial J n ( x ) Jacobsthal–Lucas polynomial j n ( x )
3 x −2Fermat polynomial F n ( x ) Fermat–Lucas polynomial f n ( x )
2 x −1CPs of the 2nd-kind U n 1 ( x ) CPs of 1st-kind 2 T n ( x )
Table 2. Power form and inversion coefficients for some non-symmetric polynomials.
Table 2. Power form and inversion coefficients for some non-symmetric polynomials.
Polynomial F , m in (15) F ¯ , m in (17)
R ˜ ( ρ , γ ) ( x ) ( 1 ) m ! Γ ( 1 + ρ ) ( 1 + γ ) m ( 1 + ρ + γ ) 2 m ( m ) ! ! Γ ( 1 + m + ρ ) ( 1 + γ ) m ( 1 + ρ + γ ) m m ( 1 + ρ ) m ( 1 + m + γ ) ( 2 + 2 m 2 + ρ + γ ) L ( 1 + m + ρ + γ ) m
S ( x ) m m 2 m m 1 + m i ! ( i + 1 ) ! ( 1 ) m ( 1 + 2 i 2 m ) ( 2 i m + 1 ) ! m !
B ( x ) B m m m + 1 m m + 1
Table 3. Power form and inversion coefficients for some symmetric polynomials.
Table 3. Power form and inversion coefficients for some symmetric polynomials.
Polynomial H , m in (14) H ¯ , m in (16)
C ( λ ) ( x ) ( 1 ) 2 1 + m 2 m ! Γ ( m + λ ) Γ ( 1 + 2 λ ) ( m 2 ) ! ! Γ ( 1 + λ ) Γ ( m + 2 λ ) 2 m + 1 ( m 2 + λ ) m ! Γ ( λ + 1 ) Γ ( m 2 + 2 λ ) ( m 2 ) ! ! Γ ( 2 λ + 1 ) Γ ( 1 + m + λ )
H ( x ) ( 1 ) 2 2 + m m ! ! ( 2 + m ) ! 2 m m ! ! ( m 2 ) !
F A , B ( x ) A m 2 B ( m 2 + 1 ) ! ( 1 ) ( m 2 + 1 ) ( m + 2 ) 1 B ! A m
L A ¯ , B ¯ ( x ) A ¯ m 2 B ¯ m ( 1 2 + m ) 1 ! c m 2 ( 1 ) A ¯ m B ¯ ( 1 + m ) !
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Alqubori, O.M.; Amin, A.K. New Results for Certain Jacobsthal-Type Polynomials. Mathematics 2025, 13, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050715

AMA Style

Abd-Elhameed WM, Alqubori OM, Amin AK. New Results for Certain Jacobsthal-Type Polynomials. Mathematics. 2025; 13(5):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abd-Elhameed, Waleed Mohamed, Omar Mazen Alqubori, and Amr Kamel Amin. 2025. "New Results for Certain Jacobsthal-Type Polynomials" Mathematics 13, no. 5: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050715

APA Style

Abd-Elhameed, W. M., Alqubori, O. M., & Amin, A. K. (2025). New Results for Certain Jacobsthal-Type Polynomials. Mathematics, 13(5), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop