Asymptotic Analysis of the Bias–Variance Trade-Off in Subsampling Metropolis–Hastings

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are fundamental to Bayesian inference but are often computationally prohibitive for large datasets, as the full likelihood must be evaluated at each iteration. Subsampling-based approximate Metropolis–Hastings (MH) algorithms offer a popular alternative, trading a manageable bias for a significant reduction in per-iteration cost. While this bias–variance trade-off is empirically understood, a formal theoretical framework for its optimization has been lacking. Our work establishes such a framework by bounding the mean squared error (MSE) as a function of the subsample size (m), the data size (n), and the number of epochs (E). This analysis reveals two optimal asymptotic scaling laws: the optimal subsample size is $m^{★}=O\left(E^{1/2}\right)$, leading to a minimal MSE that scales as ${\mathrm{MSE}}^{★}=O\left(E^{-1/2}\right)$. Furthermore, leveraging the large-sample asymptotic properties of the posterior, we show that when augmented with a control variate, the approximate MH algorithm can be asymptotically more efficient than the standard MH method under ideal conditions. Experimentally, we first validate the two optimal asymptotic scaling laws. We then use Bayesian logistic regression and Softmax classification models to highlight a key difference in convergence behavior: the exact algorithm starts with a high MSE that gradually decreases as the number of epochs increases. In contrast, the approximate algorithm with a practical control variate maintains a consistently low MSE that is largely insensitive to the number of epochs.