Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning for Bifurcation Detection: Extending Early Warning Signals to Dynamical Systems with Coloured Noise
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Stochastic Game Models for Collaborative Emergency Response in a Two-Tier Disaster Relief System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vanishing Cycles and Analysis of Singularities of Feynman Diagrams
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dark Energy from Time Crystals

by
Laura Mersini-Houghton
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Mathematics 2025, 13(17), 2781; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172781
Submission received: 12 July 2025 / Revised: 1 August 2025 / Accepted: 19 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025

Abstract

In this work, we analyze a scalar field model which gives rise to stable bound states in field space characterized by nonzero motion that breaks the underlying time translation symmetry of its Hamiltonian, known as time crystals. We demonstrate that an ideal fluid made up of these time crystals behaves as phantom dark energy characterized by an equation of state w < 1 , speed of sound squared c s 2 0 , and nonnegative energy density ρ 0 .
MSC:
37N20

1. Introduction

The nature and time evolution of dark energy have remained open outstanding problems in physics [1,2] for nearly three decades. Non-canonical scalar field models have been extensively studied in cosmology due to their rich dynamics and potential to explain dark energy and inflationary phenomena [3,4,5,6,7]. These models exhibit interesting behaviors that, besides phantom regimes in cosmology [7,8], lead to non-trivial stability properties in condensed matter systems [9,10]. Recent exciting observational advances from the DESI collaboration favor a phantom type of dark energy in the early universe [11,12,13,14] at a high significance level. The latter has renewed attention on phantom dark energy models.
A representative class of models with non-canonical kinetic terms give rise to the formation of crystalline-type structures, which oscillate in time rather than space, known as time crystals. They arise whenever a system described by a time-independent Hamiltonian has stable bound state solutions that spontaneously break the time translation symmetry of its Hamiltonian and reduce its time translation symmetry to a discrete subgroup that is periodic in time. In this work, we investigate the time crystals model proposed in [9,10] and show that it behaves as an ideal fluid with a phantom dark energy equation of state.
Starting our investigation with a general non-canonical Lagrangian, we first derive the general expressions for the energy density ρ , pressure p, equation-of-state parameter w, and speed of sound squared c s 2 , and then apply these results to the time crystal model of [9].
A general non-canonical scalar field model is described by the Lagrangian density
L = f ( ϕ ) g ( X ) V ( ϕ ) ,
where: ϕ = ϕ 0 ( t ) + δ ϕ ( t , x ) is a scalar field with ϕ 0 the background field and δ ϕ perturbations about it. As is typical of inflationary models, the background field ϕ 0 ( t ) is homogeneous while perturbations are functions of space and time ( x , t ). The kinetic term defined as X = 1 2 g μ ν ϕ μ ν reduces to X = 1 2 ϕ ˙ 2 > 0 for the homogeneous mode ϕ 0 . Here, f ( ϕ ) > 0 is a positive semi-definite function of ϕ ; g ( X ) is a non-trivial function of X, and V ( ϕ ) is the potential of the scalar field, which we take to be a semi-definite positive function.
The conditions required for an ideal fluid with a phantom equation of state w < 1 , a nonnegative energy density ρ 0 , and a positive speed of sound squared c s 2 0 are reviewed in Section 2. In Section 3, we apply these considerations to the specific model of time crystals of [9,10,15] and explore its connection to phantom dark energy. From here on, we focus on the dynamics of the homogeneous field ϕ 0 and drop the subscript 0. The study of perturbations is reported in a companion paper [16].

2. General Formalism

The energy-momentum tensor for a scalar field in a flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) universe is given by
T μ ν = μ ϕ L ( ν ϕ ) g μ ν L .
For a homogeneous scalar field ϕ = ϕ ( t ) , the corresponding energy density ρ and pressure p of the ideal fluid are
ρ = T 0 0 = ϕ ˙ L ϕ ˙ L ,
p = 1 3 T i i = L ,
where i runs over spatial indices. Hence, for an ideal fluid, its pressure p and energy density ρ are identified with the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian of the scalar field, respectively.
The relevant Einstein equations are the Friedmann equation and the Bianchi identity. The Friedman equation is
( a ˙ a ) 2 = 8 π G 3 ( ρ + ρ m )
where a ( t ) is the scale factor of the FRW metric with line element d s 2 = d t 2 + a ( t ) 2 d x ( 3 ) 2 , and ˙ = d / d t . In general, we could allow for other matter and energy components ρ m in the universe, not related to the non-canonical ideal fluid ϕ . However, the phantom dark energy component soon dominates the expansion while the matter and radiation components dilute away, rendering them insignificant. For this reason we ignore the contribution of ρ m in the equations below.
The Bianchi identity of the fluid is
ρ ˙ + 3 a ˙ a ( ρ + p ) = 0
In this class of models, the non-canonical conjugate momenta Π , obtained as a derivative of L with respect to ϕ ˙ , is different from the kinetic momentum ϕ ˙
Π = L ϕ ˙ = f ( ϕ ) g ( X ) X ϕ ˙ = f ( ϕ ) g ( X ) ϕ ˙ ,
where g ( X ) = d g d X and ϕ ˙ = ± 2 X .
Due to the non-canonical nature of the Lagrangian, the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian expressions below are quite different from one another. We substitute the definition of the energy density from Equation (3) to obtain the Hamiltonian
ρ = H = Π ϕ ˙ L
= f ( ϕ ) 2 X g ( X ) g ( X ) + V ( ϕ ) .
whereas from Equation (4), we have
p = f ( ϕ ) g ( X ) V ( ϕ ) .
The equation-of-state parameter w of the cosmic fluid ϕ is defined by
w ϕ = p ρ = f ( ϕ ) g ( X ) V ( ϕ ) f ( ϕ ) 2 X g ( X ) g ( X ) + V ( ϕ ) .
The speed of sound squared is given by [6]
c s 2 = p , X ρ , X ,
where p , X = p X and ρ , X = ρ X , and,
p , X = f ( ϕ ) g ( X ) ,
ρ , X = f ( ϕ ) ( g ( X ) + 2 X g ( X ) ) ,
with g ( X ) = d 2 g d X 2 .
Therefore, the expression for the speed of sound squared becomes
c s 2 = g ( X ) g ( X ) + 2 X g ( X ) .

Conditions for Stable Phantom Behavior with Positive Energy Density

A phantom dark energy fluid has an equation-of-state parameter w ϕ < 1 . We demand that the energy density of the phantom fluid given by Equation (9) is positive, and explore the field range under which the three quantities of interest simultaneously satisfy their constraints ( ρ 0 , c s 2 0 , w ϕ 1 ).
Given the requirement that ρ 0 , from Equation (11) the condition w ϕ < 1 is equivalent to
ρ + p < 0 .
Using Equations (9) and (10), the condition w ϕ < 1 then implies
f ( ϕ ) X g ( X ) < 0 .
Since f ( ϕ ) > 0 and X > 0 , the condition for a phantom dark energy equation of state further simplifies to
g ( X ) < 0 .
Note that the conditions for phantom behavior depend solely on the expression of the kinetic term g ( X ) and are completely independent of the type of potential V ( ϕ ) chosen.
The requirement ρ 0 is equivalent to
f ( ϕ ) 2 X g ( X ) g ( X ) + V ( ϕ ) 0 .
Since f ( ϕ ) > 0 , it can be further simplified as
2 X g ( X ) g ( X ) + V ( ϕ ) f ( ϕ ) 0 .
an inequality which can be solved, given a specific expression of g ( X ) and V ( ϕ ) . The ρ 0 requirement of Equation (20) depends on the specific forms of g ( X ) , V ( ϕ ) , and f ( ϕ ) .
However, given that g ( X ) 0 for phantom dark energy ideal fluids, and given further restrictions that we will discuss below in the context of time crystals that limit the field from exploring a wide range of the field space and confine it to the crystal region, as well as the coupling of the field to gravity on an expanding FRW background, these restrictions make the dependence on the potential energy term sufficiently weak to be accommodated by a large class of generic models. Potentials that satisfy the positive energy condition would only be weakly tuned.
If the speed of sound squared were negative, we would be looking at a tachyonic fluid, which is wildly unstable. Therefore, requiring the speed of sound squared of the fluid to be positive or zero provides the regions of stability in the field space.
The speed of sound squared is given by Equation (15). Our third requirement that c s 2 0 leads to the following constraint on derivatives of g ( X ) :
g ( X ) g ( X ) + 2 X g ( X ) 0 .
This inequality depends on the signs of g ( X ) and g ( X ) + 2 X g ( X ) . But the equation of state of the phantom fluid already imposed the condition that g ( X ) 0 , which means that c s 2 0 can only be satisfied for
2 X g ( X ) + g ( X ) 0 .
Combining the three constraints ( c s 2 0 , w < 1 , ρ 0 ) for the phantom regime, we now apply them to the time crystal model given in [9]. We show that the time crystal model of [9,10] gives rise to phantom dark energy and the range of X X t inside the crystal boundaries satisfies all three constraints. To demonstrate this, it requires solving the inequalities described in this section simultaneously. Notice that, in contrast to k-essence models where the field can explore a large range in field space, in the case of time crystals, the field becomes more intriguing since the field is confined to a small range within the boundaries of the crystal, and forbidden to climb out of the crystal range.

3. Application of Phantom Dark Energy Conditions to the Time Crystal Model

Time crystals were first discovered in [9,10]. Although their discovery is relatively recent, there already exists a vast literature on the topic of time crystals and experiments set up for observing them in a lab, reviewed in [15].
In this work, we take the kinetic term g ( X ) to be that of the time crystal model of [9] and show that it produces phantom dark energy. However, the formalism presented here can be extended to more complex time crystal models.

3.1. A Time Crystal Lagrangian

Consider the time crystal Lagrangian density of [9],
L = κ 2 X + λ 2 X 2 V ( ϕ ) ,
where κ 2 > 0 and λ 2 > 0 are constants, f ( ϕ ) = 1 , and V ( ϕ ) is a positive semi-definite potential. The non-canonical kinetic term g ( X ) of the previous section is
g ( X ) = κ 2 X + λ 2 X 2
Applying the results of the previous section, the Hamiltonian obtained from this Lagrangian is
H = κ 2 X + 3 λ 2 X 2 + V ( ϕ )
which can be rewritten as
H = 3 λ 2 ( X X t ) 2 + ( V ( ϕ ) κ 2 2 12 λ 2 )
where
H + L = Π ϕ ˙
and conjugate momentum,
Π = L ϕ ˙ = ϕ ˙ ( κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X )
= ϕ ˙ ( κ 2 + λ 2 ϕ ˙ 2 )
The boundary X t = κ 2 / 6 λ 2 defines the turning points of the bound orbit of the time crystal that minimize kinetic energy H X | X = X t = 0 , corresponding to ϕ ˙ t = ± ( κ 2 / 3 λ 2 ) 1 / 2 0 . Note that there is motion X 0 along the orbit X t which gives rise to the spontaneous breaking of the time translation symmetry of the Hamiltonian as is apparent from Equation (26). The effective potential W ( ϕ ) in the expression for the Hamiltonian, Equation (26), is given by
W ( ϕ ) = V ( ϕ ) κ 2 2 / 12 λ 2 = V ( ϕ ) Λ T
Rewriting the energy density in this manner illustrates the fact that the crystal contributes an overall constant negative energy term Λ T in Equation (30) that contributes to the effective potential of the energy expression of Equation (26). The term Λ T , which appears naturally from time crystals, can offset a large positive vacuum energy and alleviate the notorious fine-tuning problem of vacuum energy (by 123 orders of magnitude), through a far less-tuned choice of its parameters λ 2 , κ 2 . The parameters λ 2 , κ 2 , which enter in a ratio, can take reasonable values and still be such that their combination in the time crystal contribution to vacuum energy Λ T is large or small enough to absorb the background’s positive vacuum energy.
Furthermore, we can also rewrite the Lagrangian for this model as
L = λ 2 ( X X d ) 2 ( V ( ϕ ) + κ 2 2 4 λ 2 )
where X d is defined as the locus of the Lagrangian L X | X = X d = 0 . As we will see below, by writing the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian in this manner, both points X t , X d will play an important role in the dynamics of the fluid.
For the ideal fluid with a stress energy tensor,
T μ ν = ( ρ + p ) u μ u ν p g μ ν
with u μ the unit 4-vector-normalized to unity, whereas the pressure density of the fluid is given by the Lagrangian Equation (31) of the scalar field, p = L , and the energy density of the fluid is given by the Hamiltonian expression ρ = H of Equation (26). With this notation, we can rewrite the energy density of the fluid:
ρ = 3 λ 2 ( X X t ) 2 + W ( ϕ )
Note that while the non-canonical form of the kinetic term of the time crystal contributes a term Λ t , which reduces the total energy of the ideal fluid by a finite negative constant energy Λ T = κ 2 2 12 λ 2 ; meanwhile, the correction to the pressure of the ideal fluid increases the pressure by a positive constant amount p t = 3 Λ T = + κ 2 2 / 4 λ 2 . The pressure correction term for the effective pressure is positive and three times larger than the energy correction in the effective potential, typical of a solid’s equation of state.
From Lagrangian equations of motion we have
1 a ( t ) 3 d a ( t ) 3 Π ( X ) d t = L ϕ
which, when expanded, reads L ϕ = 3 H Π + Π ˙ , with H = a ˙ a as the Hubble parameter. The equation of motion can be written specifically in terms of the field, by factoring out ρ X and using the definition of the speed of sound, as
ϕ ¨ + 3 H c s 2 ϕ ˙ + 1 ρ X V ( ϕ ) ϕ = 0
The equations of motion are directly related to three points and regions of interest in the field space of the time crystals’ ideal fluid, which show up as X t and X d in Equations (26) and (31).
The set of Einstein’s equations, e.g., H ρ , coupled to the field equation of motion Equation (35), and the perturbations equation [16] can be solved numerically and we will report these results in an upcoming paper. However, since the Hubble parameter grows and the scale factor diverges within a finite time interval, according to Equation (34), the conjugate momentum is driven to zero as Π 1 a 3 during the same time interval t t 0 w / ( 1 + w ) with t 0 the present time [8], as a ( t ) .
The turning points can be obtained by minimizing kinetic energy or equivalently from the cusps of the conjugate momentum. The cusps of the conjugate momentum Π ( X ) indicate critical points in the field space because, as can be seen by a direct inspection, the speed of sound diverges there c s 2 > . These cusps are found by
Π ϕ ˙ = 0
solutions, which occur exactly at the turning points of the time crystal ϕ ˙ t = ± κ 2 / 3 λ 2 or X = X t . The latter, in combination with the fact that the speed of sound squared diverges at the boundary, indicates that these bound structures, the time crystals, are stable against perturbations [16] and the field is confined to the time crystal region X X t where the boundary of the crystal behaves as a hard wall. The latter should be contrasted with k-essence models where the field explores a large range in field space. Hence, the time crystal bound state is a state of minimum kinetic energy, despite the fact that the underlying time translation symmetry is broken and there is motion X 0 along the orbit. The meaning of ( X t , ± ϕ t ) then becomes clear as the turning points that define the orbit of the bound state, but which, due to motion, break time translation symmetry of the Hamiltonian and become time crystals.
Another point of interest is the one where the group velocity of the field vanishes and the kinetic energy is once again minimized, the locus of the Lagrangian Π = L ϕ ˙ = 0 . As can be seen from Equation (29), this occurs at X = X d = κ 2 2 λ 2 or equivalently along the orbit defined by the special points ϕ d = ± κ 2 / λ 2 that enter the Lagrangian expression, Equation (31). However these points lie outside the crystal’s allowed field range, X d > X t . Due to the fact that the boundary of the crystal X = X t is a hard wall type with a diverging speed of sound squared, the field cannot access regions X > X t beyond the crystal boundary; therefore, it cannot reach X d .

3.2. Phantom Dark Energy from the Time Crystal Model

Let us now investigate the relation between the time crystal model described in the previous section to phantom dark energy fluids with ( w < 1 , c s 2 > 0 , ρ > 0 ) . The first and second derivatives of g ( X ) are
g ( X ) = κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X ,
g ( X ) = 2 λ 2 .
The condition for Phantom dark energy behavior, ( w < 1 ) provided that ρ 0 , Equation (18), is g ( X ) < 0 . Substituting g ( X ) from Equation (37) gives
X < κ 2 2 λ 2 .
Hence, phantom behavior occurs anywhere in the region below the point X X d where group velocity of the field and conjugate momentum Π vanish:
0 < X < κ 2 2 λ 2 .
The requirement for a nonnegative energy density ( ρ 0 ), with f ( ϕ ) = 1 is satisfied by
κ 2 X + 3 λ 2 X 2 + V ( ϕ ) 0 .
which, for any specified potential, is straightforward to solve as a quadratic inequality. For potentials that satisfy W ( ϕ ) 0 , equivalently V ( ϕ ) κ 2 2 12 λ 2 , the energy density is positive everywhere, as is clear from Equation (26).
Given the above bounds on g ( X ) , W ( ϕ ) it is easy to see that the energy density is always positive in the region of interest where the ideal fluid has phantom behavior, which includes the time crystal X X t .
The equation-of-state parameter w ϕ for the ideal fluid described by the time crystal model is of a phantom type,
w ϕ = p ρ = κ 2 X + λ 2 X 2 V ( ϕ ) κ 2 X + 3 λ 2 X 2 + V ( ϕ ) 1
for all X X d .
Finally let us check the condition for stability ( c s 2 0 ) of the phantom fluid that enters the field equation, Equation (35). At this point, the behavior of the model becomes interesting.
Using Equation (15), we have
c s 2 = κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X κ 2 + 6 λ 2 X .
The requirement c s 2 0 implies
κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X κ 2 + 6 λ 2 X 0 .
which varies across the X -space.
The variation of the behavior of the field and of the speed of sound squared across the whole range of ( ϕ , X ) divides this range into three regions, as summarized below. Given
p X = κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X ,
ρ X = κ 2 + 6 λ 2 X .
The three regions are
1. The time crystal region: X κ 2 6 λ 2
  • p X < 0 ;
  • ρ X < 0 ;
  • c s 2 > 0 ,   w ϕ < 1 ,   ρ > 0 .
2. The forbidden region: bounded below by the orbit of the time crystal X t and above by the locus of the Lagrangian X d , respectively, κ 2 6 λ 2 < X < κ 2 2 λ 2
  • p X < 0 ;
  • ρ X > 0 ;
  • c s 2 < 0 , (unstable) goes through zero at X = X 0 , and ρ > 0 ,   w ϕ < 1 .
3. The quintessence region: X X d = κ 2 2 λ 2
  • p X 0 ;
  • ρ X 0 ;
  • c s 2 0 ,   w ϕ > 1 ,   ρ > 0 .
There is an additional point of interest in the forbidden region 2, where the speed of sound goes through zero again and halfway in this region it switches from negative to positive indicating stability at X = X 0 = κ 2 4 λ 2 = X d / 2 , found by the condition of Section 1: 2 X g ( X ) g ( X ) . In the forbidden region X t X X 0 the momentum Π obtained by the quadratic equation above ρ 0 is imaginary and the field solution is a decaying mode. Therefore, stability ( c s 2 0 ) occurs only when the field is confined in the time crystal region or if it were to start at a high conjugate moment for X X d :
X κ 2 6 λ 2 or X κ 2 2 λ 2 .
However, the unstable region above X t is inaccessible to the field since time crystals are in stable bound states and the speed of sound squared diverges at the boundary X = X t , as given by cusps in the momentum space. These imply that the field is confined in the crystal region and it would require infinite work done to it to jump over the crystal boundary and to break the crystal structure. Even if the field were to tunnel through X t boundary with a small probability, it would die out to zero quickly since the momentum becomes imaginary and the field solution is a decaying mode in the forbidden region. In other words, these crystals are very stable structures, and the field is confined within the boundaries of the crystal.
The only region accessible to the field is the time crystal interval that simultaneously satisfies all the conditions for the phantom dark energy, which is the time crystal region 0 < X κ 2 6 λ 2 , provided W ( ϕ ) 0 . In this region, we find the following:
w ϕ < 1 (phantom behavior); c s 2 0 (stability); ρ 0 if the potential V ( ϕ ) is sufficiently large to ensure ρ 0 .
The latter is automatically satisfied throughout the field space if we require W ( ϕ ) 0 , which can be easily achieved by multiplying the potential V ( ϕ ) by an overall constant factor without changing or tuning its functional form. Despite that p X and ρ X are negative within the crystal boundaries, the important factor for the stability of the field is their ratio, which gives the speed of sound squared to be positive, c s 2 = p X ρ X > 0 . As can be seen from the field equation in an expanding FRW universe, Equation (35), the Hubble drag term multiplied by the speed of sound overwhelmingly dominates over the potential term. The only effect of ρ X < 0 is to invert the sign of the potential, a term which is insignificant relative to the growing Hubble drag term, since H a ( t ) 3 2 ( 1 + w ) ,   c s 2 1 . (This stability remains true for the field perturbations also, as studied in [16]).
For X κ 2 2 λ 2 , stability is maintained and ρ 0 , but w ϕ > 1 , so the phantom behavior is lost and replaced by a quintessence-type dynamics. However, if the field is bound below X d in the time crystal region, it would not be possible for the field to break away from its bound state and suddenly jump over to X = X d , which is the boundary of the quintessence region, with the momentum Π d = 0 and the group velocity is zero at that initial boundary. The field could not access the region X > X t .
The table below, Table 1, classifies the three regions of interest in field space, and summarizes these results, detailing the range of X, energy density, equation-of-state parameter, and sound speed squared c s 2 for all the field space regions, as discussed above.
The Hamiltonian is a single-valued function at the trivial point X = 0 , the equation of state w ϕ = 1 is that of a pure positive cosmological constant, and the speed of sound c s 2 = 1 indicates a canonical ideal fluid.
In the region between zero and the turning points for the orbit 0 < X < X t = κ 2 6 λ 2 we have the time crystal, which is a stable bound state, for the reasons discussed above. The Hamiltonian is a double-valued function of ϕ ˙ . The energy density remains positive:
ρ ϕ = κ 2 X + 3 λ 2 X 2 + V ( ϕ ) > 0 .
The equation-of-state parameter satisfies
w ϕ < 1 ,
characterizing phantom-like behavior. The sound speed squared is positive:
c s 2 = κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X κ 2 + 6 λ 2 X > 0 .
This ensures stable perturbations within this interval. At the boundary X = X t the energy density reaches
ρ = κ 2 2 12 λ 2 + V ( ϕ ) > 0 .
Here, the equation-of-state parameter w ϕ attains its minimum value within the phantom regime ( w ϕ < 1 ). The sound speed squared c s 2 at the crystal’s boundary, indicating a stable time crystal structure, which confines the field within.
The field would require an infinitely large pressure gradient, or force, to break out of the crystal boundary X t . In a sense, this boundary acts as a hard wall potential for the forbidden region X > X t , with the field trapped on its other side X X t . Hence, the region X t < X < X d = κ 2 2 λ 2 is inaccessible to the field.
The speed of sound squared being greater than one within the crystal region is typical of crystalline structures. Its contribution to the metric perturbation equation is to dampen perturbations [8] that would contribute to cold dark matter, thereby offering a smoking gun for testing this model.
In the region above the time crystal orbit, the scalar field continues to exhibit phantom-like behavior with
w ϕ < 1 .
The energy density remains positive:
ρ > 0 .
However, the sound speed squared becomes negative and the momentum imaginary
c s 2 = κ 2 + 2 λ 2 X κ 2 + 6 λ 2 X < 0 ,
The speed of sound squared goes from negative values through zero halfway in the region at X = X 0 = X d / 2 and then it switches to positive values.
At the next boundary X = X d where the conjugate momentum Π and group velocity start from zero, the energy density is
ρ ϕ = κ 2 2 4 λ 2 + V ( ϕ ) > 0 .
The equation-of-state parameter returns to 1 :
w ϕ = 1 ,
resembling a cosmological constant. The sound speed squared c s 2 is unity:
c s 2 = 1 .
This ensures stable perturbations at this critical point.
Above X d in the region where X d < X , the conjugate momentum Π starts increasing and the scalar field transitions to quintessence-like behavior with
1 < w ϕ < 0 .
The energy density remains positive:
ρ ϕ > 0 .
The sound speed squared satisfies
0 < c s 2 < 1 ,
indicating stable perturbations within the quintessence regime. However, for the reasons discussed above, regions above the boundary of the time crystal with X > X t are not accessible due to the hard wall at the boundary X t of the crystal where c s 2 . Perturbations around the crystal solution, ( δ ϕ ¨ + c s 2 k 2 a 2 + ( 3 H + 6 λ 2 ϕ ¨ ϕ ˙ ρ X ) δ ϕ ˙ + 1 ρ X 2 V ϕ 2 = 0 ), were studied in [16,17] and shown to be stable. Besides, the time crystal region X X t is favored as the state that minimizes energy.

4. Conclusions

Until recently, phantom dark energy models have been studied in the context of k-essence fluids with non-canonical kinetic energies.
Other interesting dark energy models involving quantum modifications or gravitational condensates, or addressing cosmological tensions, were recently discussed in [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In this work, we investigated the time crystal model proposed in [9,10] and showed that, in the context of cosmology, it gives rise to phantom dark energy, with an equation of state w ϕ 1 , a positive speed of sound squared c s 2 0 , and positive energy density ρ 0 , which drives the expansion of the universe towards the Big Rip. These results were generalized in [27], which showed that all non-canonical phantom dark energy models give rise to time crystals and vice versa. While both k-essence models and the time crystal model discussed here have in common non-canonical kinetic terms, in the latter case, we are dealing with a collection of crystalline structures that break time symmetry and behave as a phantom fluid instead of matter. Furthermore, in contrast to k-essence models where the field explores a large volume in field space, in time crystals, the field is confined within the boundary of the crystal whereby the rest of the field space is inaccessible by a hard wall.
The possibility of ghost or gradient instabilities is often a cause of concern in k-essence models [17,28]. These instabilities on the field and its perturbations do not arise in the present model, as shown in [16]. The time crystals are on an expanding FRW background where the ever-increasing Hubble drag term, multiplied by a crystal’s positive speed of sound squared, dominates over the potential term.
Furthermore, the speed of sound in the crystal region X X t is such that c s 2 1 typical of crystalline structures. Observationally this sound speed would modify the Newtonian potential in a unique way, which could provide a way of testing this model. The couple of equations of metric perturbations and field equations can only be solved numerically and we will report these results in an upcoming paper.
The speed of sound squared diverges at the boundary of the time crystal in field space X t , which implies that these, and their perturbations, are very stable structures bound by a hard wall in field space. Yet, not only is the field confined to remain in the crystal region X X t , but dynamics favors it to naturally be found there since the crystal state minimizes energy.
Finally, the crystalline structure is time, which behaves as a phantom dark energy ideal fluid, naturally contributing an overall constant negative vacuum energy, Λ T . Without the need for fine-tuning that is typical of the cosmological constant problem, this contribution to vacuum energy can offset a positive cosmological constant, with a reasonable, less-tuned choice for the values of the parameters ( λ 2 , κ 2 ) whose ratio determines the magnitude of Λ T .
Note added: The stability concern for this model was addressed in detail in [16]. There, it was shown that the coupling of the field to gravity and its perturbations on an expanding background contribute a Hubble drag term that dominates over the potential term in the field and perturbation equations and makes the model stable for as long as the speed of sound squared is positive, as is the case in this model.

Funding

The author is grateful to the Klingsberg foundation for their support.

Acknowledgments

L. Mersini-Houghton is grateful to Y. J. Ng, O. Akarsu, and E. Di Valentino for useful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Frieman, J.; Turner, M.; Huterer, D. Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 46, 385–432. [Google Scholar]
  2. Peebles, P.J.; Ratra, B. The cosmological constant and dark energy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2003, 75, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Armendariz-Picon, C.; Mukhanov, V.F.; Steinhardt, P.J. A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chiba, T.; Okabe, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Kinetically driven quintessence. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 62, 023511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Armendariz-Picon, C.; Mukhanov, V.F.; Steinhardt, P.J. Essentials of k essence. Phys. Rev. D 2001, 63, 103510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garriga, J.; Mukhanov, V.F. Perturbations in k-inflation. Phys. Lett. B 1999, 458, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Melchiorri, A.; Mersini-Houghton, L.; Ödman, C.J.; Trodden, M. The state of the dark energy equation of state. Phys. Rev. D 2003, 68, 043509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erickson, J.K.; Caldwell, R.R.; Steinhardt, P.J.; Armendariz-Picon, C.; Mukhanov, V. Measuring the speed of sound of quintessence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 121301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shapere, A.; Wilczek, F. Classical Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 160402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilczek, F. Quantum Time Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 160401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lodha, K.; Calderon, R.; Matthewson, W.L.; Shafieloo, A.; Ishak, M.; Pan, J.; Garcia-Quintero, C.; Huterer, D.; Valogiannis, G.; Ureña-López, L.A.; et al. Extended Dark Energy Analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.14743 [astro-ph.CO]. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wolf, W.; Garcia-Garcia, C.; Anton, T.; Ferreira, P. The cosmological evidence for non-minimal coupling. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.07679 [astro-ph.CO]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wolf, W.; Ferreira, P.; Garcia-Garcia, C. Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, L041303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ye, G.; Martinelli, M.; Hu, B.; Silvestri, A. Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025, 134, 181002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sacha, K.; Zakrzewski, J. Time Crystals: A Review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018, 81, 016401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mersini-Houghton, L. A Note on the Stability of the Dark Energy Model from Time Crystals. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.16764 [gr-qc]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Appignani, C.; Casadio, R.; Shankaranarayanan, S.; Ferreira, A.J.; Pinto-Nelson, N.; Zanelli, J. A note on second order perturbations of non-canonical scalar fields. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hlozek, R.; Grin, D.; Marsh, D.J.; Ferreira, P.G. A search for evidence of dynamical dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 103512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Poulin, V.; Smith, T.L.; Karwal, T.; Kamionkowski, M. Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 221301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Easson, D.; Vikman, A. The phantom of the new oscillatory cosmological phase. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1607.00996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Easson, D.; Manton, T. Stable cosmic time crystals. Phy. Rev. D 2018, 99, 043507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Novikov, E. Ultra light gravitons with tiny electric dipoles are seeping from vacuum. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 15, 16500929. [Google Scholar]
  23. Novikov, E. Quantum modification of general relativity. Electron. J. Theor. Phys. 2016, 13, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mondal, A.; Ghosh, S. Gravitational wave propagation in a geometric condensate in Starobinsky cosmology. Eur. Phys. J. 2025, 85, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Das, R.K.; Mondal, A.; Ghosh, S.; Pan, S. Cosmology in R2-gravity: Effects of a higher derivative scalar condensate background. J. High Energy Astrophys. 2024, 43, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chakraborty, S.; Ghosh, S. Nontrivial time crystal-like ground state for gravitational perturbation in quadratic gravity. Phys. Dark Univ. 2022, 35, 100976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mersini-Houghton, L. The nature of phantom dark energy and its relation to time crystals. Nature Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 30257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Copeland, E.; Sami, M.; Tsujikawa, S. Dynamics of Dark Energy. IJMP 2006, 15, 1753–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Classification of key points and regions in the time crystal scalar field model.
Table 1. Classification of key points and regions in the time crystal scalar field model.
RegionRange of X ρ w ϕ c s 2
Trivial Canonical Vacuum Energy X = 0 ρ = V ( ϕ ) > 0 w ϕ = 1 c s 2 = 1
Time Crystal Region 0 < X < X t = κ 2 6 λ 2 ρ > 0 w ϕ < 1 c s 2 > 1
Time Crystal Boundary lim X X t = κ 2 6 λ 2 ρ = κ 2 2 12 λ 2 + V ( ϕ ) > 0 w ϕ w ϕ min < 1 c s 2
Forbidden Region X t < X < X d = κ 2 2 λ 2 ρ > 0 w ϕ < 1 c s 2 < 0 , at X = X d / 2
c s 2 = 0 , then c s 2 > 0
Boundary of Quintessence Π = 0 ,   X = X d = κ 2 2 λ 2 ρ = κ 2 2 4 λ 2 + V ( ϕ ) > 0 w ϕ = 1 c s 2 = 0
Quintessence X > X d = κ 2 2 λ 2 ρ = κ 2 2 4 λ 2 + V ( ϕ ) > 0 w ϕ > 1 0 < c s 2 < 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mersini-Houghton, L. Dark Energy from Time Crystals. Mathematics 2025, 13, 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172781

AMA Style

Mersini-Houghton L. Dark Energy from Time Crystals. Mathematics. 2025; 13(17):2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mersini-Houghton, Laura. 2025. "Dark Energy from Time Crystals" Mathematics 13, no. 17: 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172781

APA Style

Mersini-Houghton, L. (2025). Dark Energy from Time Crystals. Mathematics, 13(17), 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13172781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop