Development Status and Trend of Mine Intelligent Mining Technology
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Related Work
3. Overall Development Process of Intelligent Mining Construction
3.1. Stand-Alone Automation Stage
3.2. Integrated Automation and Informatization Stage
3.3. Digital and Intelligent Initial Stage
3.4. Comprehensive Intelligence and “Cloud–Edge–End” Collaboration Stage
4. Current Development Status of Intelligent Mining Technology
4.1. End-Side Technology
- Data Acquisition and Multi-Source Sensing
- Environmental monitoring sensors: Install gas sensors (methane, gas, oxygen, carbon monoxide, etc.) and environmental sensors (temperature, humidity, dust, etc.) at key locations (working faces, transportation roadways, and stope entrances) to monitor mine ventilation and hazardous gas accumulation in real time. These sensors transmit data to edge nodes via wireless sensor networks, forming an environmental safety monitoring system for the mine. By analyzing the environmental data, abnormal conditions such as hazardous gas exceedances, high temperatures, and fire precursors can be promptly detected [27].
- Equipment status sensors: Install sensors on mechanical equipment (such as vibration, pressure, bearing temperature, current, voltage, etc.) to monitor the operational health status of the equipment. These data are aggregated through edge control units, facilitating operational status diagnosis and predictive maintenance, thereby improving safety and equipment utilization. For example, practical applications include technologies such as drill rod fracture warning for rock-drilling jumbos, bearing fault prediction for hoists, and motor overheating protection for autonomous mining trucks [28].
- High-definition (hd) video surveillance: Install high-definition cameras at mining faces, ventilation doors, and key operational points to conduct the real-time monitoring of excavation surfaces, equipment operation, and personnel positioning [29]. Hd video data is transmitted via 5G or underground optical fiber to edge computing nodes, where it is processed using video analytics and deep-learning algorithms for pedestrian detection, behavior recognition, and anomaly alerts [30]. Examples include alarms for personnel entering hazardous zones [31], the monitoring of the unloading process by load–haul–dump (LHD) machines, and the detection of conveyor belt damage [32].
- LiDAR Scanning: Three-dimensional laser scanning technology is increasingly being applied in mine surveying and safety inspections. Compared with traditional single-point monitoring instruments, LiDAR can rapidly acquire three-dimensional point clouds of tunnels and stopes, enabling the precise modeling of terrain, landforms, and structures [33]. As fixed laser scanning requires substantial manpower and resources, mobile SLAM LiDAR systems have gained popularity, capable of obtaining the complete point cloud data while traversing underground tunnels [34]. By comparing point clouds scanned at different times, potential safety hazards such as tunnel cross-section deformation and rock layer collapse can be accurately identified [35]. Vehicle-mounted and airborne LiDAR systems are widely used in open-pit mines for autonomous driving and scene reconstruction [36].
- Multimodal perception fusion: To enhance the perception capability in complex environments, it is necessary to integrate data from multiple sensors. For instance, obstacle detection algorithms combining image and LiDAR point cloud data can improve detection accuracy [37]. Fire safety prediction algorithms incorporating gas concentration and temperature–humidity data enable a more precise risk assessment. On the end side, future development will emphasize the application of multi-sensor information fusion technology to achieve intelligent monitoring throughout the entire mining production process.
- 2.
- Mechanized Operations and Automated Execution
- Rock-drilling equipment: In various mining scenarios, the technological evolution of rock-drilling equipment focuses on precision, unmanned operation, and multifunctional integration [21]. Traditional hydraulic drilling rigs have achieved the automatic matching of borehole coordinates with 3D digital maps by incorporating high-precision positioning and navigation systems, with errors controllable within ±100 mm. Intelligent down-the-hole drills represented by the Simba ME7 significantly improve the drilling efficiency in complex rock formations through multi-parameter adaptive control technology (the real-time matching of impact pressure, rotation speed, and feed force). Full-face tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are also being further applied. The Xianshan Iron Mine achieved a rapid excavation of the belt incline shaft through TBM technology, improving the efficiency by three times compared to traditional blasting methods.
- Excavation equipment: The shearer, as the key cutting equipment in fully mechanized coal mining faces, has evolved from manual operation to automated control. Early mechanized coal mining relied on workers manually controlling the shearer’s movement and cutting. With the development of automation technology, shearers have gradually been equipped with electronic control systems that can automatically adjust the cutting speed and depth. The literature indicates [21] that existing technologies allow shearers to work in coordination with hydraulic supports and armored face conveyors, forming a “three-machine” automation system. Roadheaders are used for the excavation and expansion of mining faces and main inclined roadways. The current research primarily focuses on improving the trajectory control and anti-interference capabilities, employing algorithms such as adaptive robust control to address rock deformation and uncertain disturbances. For example, WANG et al. [38] proposed a sliding mode control strategy based on a disturbance observer to address the precise positioning and trajectory control issues of the roadheader robot cutting head in complex underground environments.
- Loading and hauling equipment: Loading and hauling equipment (such as electric shovels, loaders, etc.) is making breakthroughs in unmanned operation and collaborative work, with autonomous navigation, swarm coordination, and remote control as its core technologies [39]. Underground load–haul–dump (LHD) vehicles have achieved unmanned operation in complex tunnels through multi-sensor fusion technology (LiDAR, inertial navigation, and machine vision) [40]. Additionally, automatic weighing and data integration technologies provide precise data support for production scheduling. Current challenges focus on dynamic obstacle avoidance and the optimization of multi-machine collaborative path conflicts, requiring the enhanced adaptability of AI decision-making algorithms.
- Transportation equipment: The automated transportation system in mines is a crucial component for enhancing production efficiency [41]. Large-scale mines both domestically and internationally have already adopted unmanned mining vehicles (primarily underground dump trucks, underground unmanned electric locomotives, and open-pit mining trucks). Technological innovations are reflected in three aspects: autonomous driving, intelligent dispatching, and green power. For instance, automatic path tracking is achieved through onboard sensors and control units, enabling obstacle recognition and avoidance in complex environments. The mine scheduling system realizes the real-time data interaction and coordination of loading and transportation, and the loading cycle time is greatly shortened, which further improves the operation efficiency.
- Auxiliary mechanical equipment: The technological development characteristics of auxiliary equipment (including shearer auxiliary hydraulic supports, roadway support equipment, hoists, belt conveyors, ventilation doors, electrical doors, etc.) are unmanned operation, dynamic regulation, and digital twins [5,13]. These devices are embedded with sensors and control units for intelligent upgrades. For example, the hydraulic support adopts an intelligent monitoring device, which can automatically detect parameters such as load and displacement, and realize the automatic follow-up and displacement propulsion with the operation of the shearer. The belt conveyor is equipped with belt tension and vibration sensors, which can realize fault warning. The hoist is interconnected with the roadway monitoring system, enabling the automatic adjustment of the lifting speed to adapt to changes in the ore flow. The application of the digital twin platform achieves three-dimensional visual monitoring and fault prediction for ventilation, drainage, and power supply systems.
4.2. Edge-Side Technology
- 1.
- Systematic Management and Control.
- Low-latency network communication: Edge computing must rely on high-speed and reliable networks to enable the rapid transmission of massive data and ensure timely control execution [43]. Modern mines utilize next-generation network technologies such as 5G and private networks to establish a campus-level infrastructure, achieving an ultra-wide bandwidth and low-latency communication. For instance, the large uplink bandwidth of 5G networks supports the high-volume transmission of high-definition video streams with a latency below 100 ms, meeting the real-time requirements of remote control equipment [44]. Communication between edge nodes and the cloud is facilitated via industrial Ethernet or optical fiber. High-speed broadband and network slicing provide isolated guarantees for diverse services (monitoring, control, data synchronization, etc.), thereby significantly enhancing the flexibility and reliability of mine communication networks.
- The edge layer coordinates the information interaction between the cloud and end side: Edge computing nodes often serve as local control centers for mining operations, directly participating in monitoring, early warning, and dispatching tasks. They both receive large volumes of raw data from the end side for preprocessing and upload the processed results or summarized data to the cloud for an in-depth analysis [45]. Meanwhile, cloud-based strategies and model updates are also distributed to end devices through the edge layer. As Huawei’s Intelligent Mining Solution indicates that an efficient and reliable communication network is crucial in mining environments to ensure fast and secure data transmission across layers. Therefore, the edge layer acts as a “binding agent” in the architecture, bridging the sensing layer and management layer to enable the collaborative system operation without information silos.
- The edge platform serves as the “adapter” for mining scenarios: Mining production equipment comes from various suppliers with different protocols and operates under complex environmental conditions [45]. The edge platform functions as an “adapter” for diverse intelligent devices, handling tasks such as protocol conversion, data format standardization, and communication medium transformation. For instance, for various sensors or edge robots connected to the network, the edge gateway can perform data collection and preliminary fusion while ensuring device compatibility. Moreover, in geographically distributed networks, the edge layer enables the seamless connectivity across different network environments, guaranteeing device interoperability and the smooth transmission of control commands. In summary, the edge layer acts as both the localized “brain” for institutionalized mine control and the critical link supporting “cloud–edge” collaboration, providing intelligent equipment with a seamless communication and cooperative environment.
- 2.
- Edge-Side Service Applications
- Dynamic perception and modeling of mining environments: The dynamic perception and modeling of mining environments on the edge side primarily rely on multi-source sensor fusion and lightweight machine-learning algorithms. This enables real-time digital twin model updates for mine site topography, equipment distribution, ventilation status, etc. Chen et al. achieved the continuous 3D reconstruction and deformation monitoring of underground tunnel environments by deploying deep learning and sensor data fusion frameworks on edge nodes, improving the timeliness and accuracy of model updates. For mining road and falling object detection, methods such as FusionPlanner [46] utilize multi-sensor fusion on edge nodes to execute multi-task motion planning, balancing lateral and longitudinal control with path optimization to ensure the stable operation of unmanned transport vehicles in high-noise environments. However, multi-source sensor fusion still faces challenges (such as data heterogeneity, spatiotemporal synchronization, and accuracy degradation) in high-noise and heavily occluded mining environments. Additionally, lightweight inference frameworks exhibit insufficient robustness in continuous 3D reconstruction scenarios. Future efforts should focus on developing self-supervised multi-modal fusion algorithms based on sparse–dense hybrid representations. As well as incorporating a multi-level spatiotemporal attention mechanism, the dynamic model achieves adaptive error correction and enables real-time inference with a low power consumption and high throughput.
- Safety identification and early warning in mining scenarios: The edge side deploys lightweight computing platforms to run target detection and behavior analysis algorithms, enabling the real-time monitoring and anomaly recognition of scene targets (environmental status, personnel behavior, vehicles, robots, etc.). Imam et al. [47] summarized various computer-vision-based collision avoidance systems. They pointed out that, in extreme low-light and dusty environments, edge-side models need to integrate infrared/visual multimodal data to ensure the detection robustness and response speed. In their PPE compliance study [48], they utilized edge nodes to run a PoseNet variant, achieving the posture estimation and compliance judgment of underground workers wearing safety helmets, providing second-level early warning capabilities for accident prevention. LIU et al. [49] introduced the semi-supervised clustering algorithm (SSCME) with concept drift detection and incremental updates on the edge node side for disaster monitoring in complex underground environments. It can adaptively identify changes in data distribution, eliminate outliers, and update the classification model. This ensures the accurate early warning of sudden ground pressure changes and gas outbursts under low-bandwidth conditions. In summary, there are some problems such as the single-point sensor distortion, centralized model update delay, and lack of interpretability. The existing identification and early warning systems struggle to meet the low-latency response and trustworthiness requirements for emergent risks. The next step is to construct an end-edge federated causal inference framework. For example, lightweight interpretable models are deployed locally to achieve the rapid fusion of multi-source data and mechanism-driven risk decision-making through incremental association reasoning and template adaptation.
- Cluster control and scheduling of mining equipment: Data interaction, task allocation, and dynamic scheduling among heterogeneous devices can achieve a leapfrog improvement in the overall efficiency and safety of the mining system. Relevant researchers have integrated edge computing with swarm intelligence algorithms to achieve the coordinated scheduling of multiple excavators, unmanned trucks, and other transportation equipment. Hao et al. [50] proposed an energy-aware edge-scheduling heuristic algorithm. By offloading task allocation and resource migration to edge nodes, it achieved “end–edge” collaborative cluster control, significantly reducing the scheduling latency and energy consumption. By employing deep reinforcement learning for scheduling policy learning, it realized load balancing and real-time task scheduling in heterogeneous device clusters. The cluster scheduling method in the unmanned transportation queue management in the open-pit mine area can reduce the path planning and task switching time of the multi-vehicle formation. In the application of underground unmanned transport vehicles, some studies are automatically planning the driving path according to the mine map and real-time obstacle information [51]. Currently, scheduling strategies driven by deep reinforcement learning have achieved results in simulation environments. However, in heterogeneous edge networks, they still face challenges such as the difficult model migration and the trade-off conflict between “energy efficiency and latency.” Future research should focus on constructing a microservice-based multi-agent collaborative architecture grounded in a service mesh. Additionally, by integrating online transfer learning mechanisms, an intelligent equipment group management and control system with cross-scenario adaptive capabilities should be established.
4.3. Cloud-Side Technology
- 1.
- Industrial Internet Platform
- 2.
- Planning and Design Digitization
- 3.
- Digital and Intelligent Decision-Making
5. Technical Challenges and Future Development Trends
5.1. Standard Specifications and Evaluation Model Development
- Unified semantic modeling system for the mining domain: Ontology-based semantic frameworks—common in domains like manufacturing and construction—are still underdeveloped in mining. Efforts such as the IFC-Mining extension project (BuildingSMART International, 2022) are currently working to extend the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) to cover the mining infrastructure and operational data, aiming to support semantic interoperability in mine planning and design [85,86]. Similarly, initiatives within the W3C SSN/SOSA framework suggest potential pathways to formalize mining sensor data using RDF/OWL vocabularies [87,88]. However, a domain-specific, multi-layer mining ontology that integrates geology, process engineering, equipment status, and safety knowledge remains a critical research and development gap.
- Intelligent mining capability maturity evaluation system: While maturity models such as CMMI or CMMM are widely used in IT and smart manufacturing, the mining industry lacks a unified capability maturity model specific to the deployment of intelligent systems. Some coal mines in China have adopted internal classification schemes for automation levels, but these assessments often rely on subjective or isolated metrics [89]. A credible system should follow the principles of the Smart Manufacturing Capability Maturity Model (SMCMM) developed by NIST, incorporating dimensions such as human–machine interaction, data lifecycle management, and autonomous decision capability. This model could guide intelligent transformation through a structured evaluation involving baseline identification, target planning, and iterative improvement.
- Standard-driven modular technology ecosystem: To support scalable and sustainable development, intelligent mining systems should embrace modular, microservice-based architectures. Although some mining software vendors (e.g., RPMGlobal, Dassault Systèmes, and ABB) have begun modularizing their platforms, true interoperability requires open APIs, standardized data formats, and well-defined service contracts. Organizations such as the China National Institute of Standardization and IEEE Global Mining Guidelines Group (GMG) have advocated for open architecture mining platforms to reduce vendor lock-in and enable the plug-and-play integration of third-party modules, such as perception algorithms or energy optimization components.
5.2. Data Collection and Intelligent Analysis Construction
- Adaptive perception–analysis mechanisms: Future systems must incorporate on-device learning and self-optimizing algorithms to adjust modeling parameters and network architectures dynamically. By embedding AutoML pipelines at the edge, perception models can automatically select optimal neural network configurations and fine-tune hyperparameters in response to shifting environmental conditions (such as the varying illumination in tunnels or changes in acoustic background), thereby maintaining a high detection accuracy without manual retraining [90]. This adaptive approach ensures that anomaly detection and predictive maintenance models remain robust across different geological sites and operational states.
- Multi-modal information fusion: To overcome the limitations of any single sensor modality, intelligent mining platforms should fuse heterogeneous data streams (video, vibration, acoustic emissions, temperature, and gas concentration) into a unified representation [91,92]. Real-time fusion at edge gateways can reconcile temporal misalignments and sensor noise, producing a coherent feature set for downstream analytics. For instance, correlating vibration signatures with high-definition video frames can pinpoint conveyor belt defects more reliably than either source alone. This unified feature space enhances fault diagnosis, reduces false alarms, and accelerates hazard identification, even under harsh field conditions.
- Knowledge-driven decision engine: Purely data-driven models often lack contextual understanding, hindering their applicability in safety-critical mining operations. Integrating domain knowledge graphs with explainable AI techniques provides a framework for traceable decision logic [93,94]. A mining knowledge graph can encode relationships among geological formations, equipment types, operational procedures, and historical incidents. When coupled with interpretable model outputs (such as feature importance scores or rule-based explanations), operators gain transparent insights into risk predictions and optimization recommendations. This hybrid approach not only improves trust in automated systems but also supports continuous learning, as newly captured data and expert feedback can be incorporated back into the knowledge base to refine future decision making.
5.3. Intelligent Equipment and Automation Construction
- Autonomous operations with lightweight intelligence: The end-side equipment deploys the algorithm model issued by the cloud, and constantly optimizes the operation strategy and driving path by receiving the instructions sent dynamically by the edge side. Meanwhile, the calculation of the equipment should be lightweight, which focuses on achieving a stable closed loop of “data acquisition and upload, instruction reception and execution”.
- Flexible and reconfigurable production scheduling: The equipment structure and control logic adopt the concept of Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMS), enabling the rapid adjustment of operational modes based on orebody parameters and production demands [95,96]. Embedded scheduling agents, aware of each machine’s current configuration and performance envelope, can negotiate task assignments and temporal overlaps, optimizing resource utilization without manual intervention.
- Self-Protection and Safety Autonomy: In high-risk scenarios, the equipment can utilize multi-sensors for omnidirectional detection, triggering functions such as self-shutdown, protection, or trajectory avoidance. This self-protective logic completes a robust closed loop that not only safeguards equipment integrity but also preserves human lives in rapidly evolving mining contexts.
5.4. Intelligent Mine Talent Cultivation and Team Building
6. Conclusions and Prospects
- The technological development process can be summarized into four stages: Stand-alone Automation Stage (1990s–2000s): (1) The core technologies included PLC/DCS systems and localized automated equipment control. The limitations encompassed data silos, poor real-time performance, and weak collaborative capabilities. (2) Integrated Informatization Stage (2000s–2010s): The core technologies involved SCADA centralized monitoring and enterprise-level IT systems (GIS/ERP). The limitations included insufficient system integration and non-uniform protocols. (3) Digitalization and Intelligentization Initiation (2010s–2020s): The core technologies comprised IoT, cloud computing, and autonomous driving. The limitations involved inadequate data compatibility, high capital investment, and insufficient standardization guidance. (4) Comprehensive Intelligentization Stage (2020s–Present): The core technologies feature cloud–edge–device collaboration, AI-driven solutions, and deep integration of 5G/digital twins. Persistent challenges include data heterogeneity, network security vulnerabilities, and talent shortages.
- The development status of relevant technologies and applications is summarized from three aspects: the end side, edge side, and cloud side. (1) On the end side, multi-source sensing technology enables the real-time monitoring and precise control of mine environments and equipment status. Intelligent equipment significantly enhances operational mechanization and execution automation. (2) The edge side leverages the network infrastructure to establish localized decision-making hubs. It accomplishes real-time data processing, 3D dynamic modeling, and safety warning tasks. Through protocol adaptation and cluster scheduling optimization, this side improves systematic management and control capabilities. (3) The cloud side constructs an industrial Internet platform. It integrates data middle platforms and digital twin technologies to support the fusion analysis, simulation optimization, and intelligent decision-making of massive heterogeneous data. The three-layer synergy drives the evolution of mining operations toward a data-driven, autonomous, and collaborative intelligent paradigm.
- Current intelligent mining technologies face multiple challenges: (1) the insufficient interoperability among heterogeneous systems (lack of standardization and protocol gaps); (2) the limited capability for multi-source heterogeneous data fusion and real-time analysis (bandwidth bottlenecks and computing power allocation conflicts); (3) the weak adaptive decision-making ability of intelligent equipment under complex working conditions (inadequate robustness in extreme environments and insufficient cross-process coordination); and (4) the structural shortage of interdisciplinary and versatile talents.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, L.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ge, S.; Wang, F. Sustainable Mining in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2024, 11, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, M.; Tan, W.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L. Current situation and development strategy of deep intelligent mining in metal mines. Chin. J. Nonferrous Metals 2021, 31, 3409–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Huang, Z. The Recent Technological Development of Intelligent Mining in China. Engineering 2017, 3, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, N.; Li, G. Discussion on the Status and Issues of Intelligence for Metal Mines in China. Met. Mine 2024, 1, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Kang, L.; Chen, X.; He, M.; Zhu, C.; Li, D. A Review of Intelligent Unmanned Mining Current Situation and Development Trend. Energies 2022, 15, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, H. Safe and intelligent mining: Some explorations and challenges in the era of big data. J. Cent. South Univ. 2023, 30, 1900–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bing, Z.; Wang, X.; Dong, Z.; Dong, L.; He, T. A novel edge computing architecture for intelligent coal mining system. Wirel. Netw. 2023, 29, 1545–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, L.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y. A New Reform of Mining Production and Management Modes under Industry 4.0: Cloud Mining Mode. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Peng, S.; Guo, Y.; Lin, P. Development status and prospect of geological guarantee technology for intelligent coal mining in China. Green Smart Min. Eng. 2024, 1, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Ren, H.; Zhao, G.; Pang, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hou, G. 2025 scenarios and development path of intelligent coal mine. J. China Coal Soc. 2018, 43, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Ren, H.; Han, A.; Gong, S. Key technology and development trend of intelligent mining in complex condition working face. J. Mine Autom. 2022, 48, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Tong, X.; Guo, J.; Zhang, D. Research status and development trend of intelligent monitoring and early warning technology in coal mine. J. Mine Autom. 2020, 46, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Ren, H.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, D.; Wen, Z.; Meng, L.; Gong, S. Research and practice of intelligent coal mine technology systems in China. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2022, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Kang, M.; Tian, Y.; Rudas, I.; Li, L.; Fanti, M.; et al. Parallel intelligence in three decades: A historical review and future perspective on ACP and cyber-physical-social systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H. The 40 years developmental review of the fully mechanized mine roadway heading technology in China. J. China Coal Soc. 2010, 35, 1815–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S. Development of coal mine automation. Ind. Mine Autom. 2013, 39, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B. Development History and Trend Analysis of Coal Mine Safety Monitoring and Control Systems. Min. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2007, 76–78. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, E.; Yu, X.; Xia, B.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, D.; Liu, T.; Wang, W. Development of mine informatization and key technologies of intelligent mines. J. China Coal Soc. 2022, 47, 564–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cu, Y.; Ren, Y.; Bai, M. Practice of intelligent construction of Shendong Coal Mine. Coal Sci. Technol. 2022, 50, 218–226. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, L.; Yu, X.; Ding, E.; Zhao, X.; Feng, S.; Zhang, D.; Liu, T.; Wang, W.; Huang, Y. Research on key technologies of human-machine-environment states perception in mine Internet of things. J. Commun. 2020, 41, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhan, K. Intelligent Mining Technology for an Underground Metal Mine Based on Unmanned Equipment. Engineering 2018, 4, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y. Building Intelligent New Mines and Setting Industry Benchmarks—The Intelligent Mine Construction Experience of Shendong Jinjie Coal Mine. J. Intell. Mine 2021, 2, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
- Bellamy, D.; Pravica, L. Assessing the impact of driverless haul trucks in Australian surface mining. Resour. Policy 2011, 36, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Mei, B.; Li, Q.; Sun, S.; Zhang, Q. Collaborative Production Planning Based on an Intelligent Unmanned Mining System for Open-Pit Mines in the Industry 4.0 Era. Machines 2024, 12, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Xie, J.; Zhang, X.; Deng, J.; Ge, S.; Wang, F. Mining 5.0: Concept and Framework for Intelligent Mining Systems in CPSS. IEEE Trans. Intell Veh. 2023, 8, 3533–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guidelines for Intelligent Mine Construction in the Nonferrous Metals Industry. China Nonferrous Met. News 2020, 2, 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Muduli, L.; Mishra, D.P.; Jana, P.K. Application of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring in underground coal mines: A systematic review. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2018, 106, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodny, J.; Tutak, M. Applying Sensor-Based Information Systems to Identify Unplanned Downtime in Mining Machinery Operation. Sensors 2022, 22, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, B.J.; Li, H.; Luan, Z.; Li, X.; Lei, Z. A lightweight coal mine pedestrian detector for video surveillance systems with multi-level feature fusion and channel pruning. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surucu, O.; Gadsden, S.A.; Yawney, J. Condition Monitoring using Machine Learning: A Review of Theory, Applications, and Recent Advances. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 221, 119738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, M. A Surveillance Video Real-Time Analysis System Based on Edge-Cloud and FL-YOLO Cooperation in Coal Mine. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 68482–68497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Zhu, Q.; Yin, Y.; Fan, Y.; Su, Z.; Zhang, S. Damage Detection Method of Mining Conveyor Belt Based on Deep Learning. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 10870–10879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Li, M.; Mao, S.; Fan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Li, B. A Coal Mine Tunnel Deformation Detection Method Using Point Cloud Data. Sensors 2024, 24, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Peng, P.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y. Efficient and accurate mapping method of underground metal mines using mobile mining equipment and solid-state lidar. Measurement 2023, 221, 113581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Zhao, Z.; Bi, L.; Wang, Z. RM2D: An automated and robust laser-based framework for mobile tunnel deformation detection. Undergr. Space 2025, 20, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Qi, S.; Zhou, J.; Tang, Y.; Yang, J.; Xin, J. High-Precision Positioning, Perception and Safe Navigation for Automated Heavy-Duty Mining Trucks. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2024, 9, 4644–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Wang, S.; Tong, J.; Wang, W. Accurate real-time obstacle detection of coal mine driverless electric locomotive based on ODEL-YOLOv5s. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wang, D.; Ma, A.; Yan, X.; Zhao, S. Intelligent Robust Control of Roadheader Based on Disturbance Observer. Actuators 2025, 14, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, T.; Zhang, T.; Cui, Y.; Song, X. Deep Learning-enhanced Intelligent Electrie Shovel Digging Trajectory Tracking Control. J. Mech. Eng. 2024, 60, 357–366. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Peng, P.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y. A novel global re-localization method for underground mining vehicles in haulage roadways: A case study of solid-state LiDAR-equipped load-haul-dump vehicles. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2025, 156, 106270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Recent progress on smart mining in China: Unmanned electric locomotive. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2017, 9, 755450555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Bi, L. Mine Edge Intelligence: A New Trend in the Construction of the Edge Layer for Smart Mines. Gold Sci. Technol. 2023, 31, 964–977. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.; Kumar, D.; Hötzel, J. IoT Based information and communication system for enhancing underground mines safety and productivity: Genesis, taxonomy and open issues. Ad Hoc Netw. 2018, 78, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, S.; Sjöberg, K.; Wallin, P. Wireless Communication in Underground Mining Teleoperation: A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 72577–72602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubiak, K.; Dec, G.; Stadnicka, D. Possible Applications of Edge Computing in the Manufacturing Industry-Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, S.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, L.; Ai, Y.; Chen, L. FusionPlanner: A multi-task motion planner for mining trucks via multi-sensor fusion. Mech. Syst. Signal Practice 2024, 208, 111051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imam, M.; Baina, K.; Tabii, Y.; Ressami, E.; Adlaoui, Y.; Benzakour, I.; Abdelwahed, E. The Future of Mine Safety: A Comprehensive Review of Anti-Collision Systems Based on Computer Vision in Underground Mines. Sensors 2023, 23, 4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imam, M.; Baïna, K.; Tabii, Y.; Ressami, E.; Adlaoui, Y.; Benzakour, I.; Bourzeix, F.; Abdelwahed, E. Ensuring Miners’ Safety in Underground Mines Through Edge Computing: Real-Time PPE Compliance Analysis Based on Pose Estimation. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 145721–145739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Su, X.; Li, C. Edge Computing for Data Anomaly Detection of Multi-Sensors in Underground Mining. Electronics 2021, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.; Cao, J.; Wang, Q.; Du, J. Energy-aware scheduling in edge computing with a clustering method. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2021, 117, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Lu, C.; Jiang, S.; Shan, L.; Xiong, N. An Unmanned Intelligent Transportation Scheduling System for Open-Pit Mine Vehicles Based on 5G and Big Data. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 135524–135539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Yu, F.R.; Deng, G.; Luo, C.; Ming, Z.; Yan, Q. Industrial Internet: A Survey on the Enabling Technologies, Applications, and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 1504–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Li, S.; Wang, X. A digital smart product service system and a case study of the mining industry: MSPSS. Adv. Eng. Inf. 2022, 53, 101694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Xie, Y.; He, Y.; Ai, Y.; Tian, B.; Li, L.; Ge, S.; Wang, F. Autonomous mining through cooperative driving and operations enabled by parallel intelligence. Commun. Eng. 2024, 3, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xi, C.; Wang, B.; Tang, B.; Geng, Y. Development of an Intelligent Coal Production and Operation Platform Based on a Real-Time Data Warehouse and AI Model. Energies 2024, 17, 5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Ren, X.; Wang, Y.; Jia, H.; Xue, M. Constructing a Coal Mine Safety Knowledge Graph to Promote the Association and Reuse of Risk Management Empirical Knowledge. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, L.; Zhong, D.; Bi, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y. Optimization Method of Mine Ventilation Network Regulation Based on Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming. Mathematic 2024, 12, 2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Ye, R.; Zhou, J.; Bai, D. Exploration and practical application of the digital intelligent mining system at Dexing Copper Mine. Nonferrous Met. Min. Sect. 2025, 77, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Zahidi, I.; Liang, D. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation cover in mining areas of Dexing City, China. Envrion. Res. 2023, 225, 115634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.; Feng, M.; Zhu, T.; Wu, A.; Yang, C.; Wang, S.; Sui, S. Construction and Application of Debris Flow Comprehensive Monitoring and Early Warning Platform Based on Sky-Ground-Underground Integration Technology. Min. Res. Dev. 2024, 44, 190–196. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, Q.; Zhu, S.; Li, Z.; Wu, A.; Wang, M.; Su, Y.; Wang, S.; Qu, X.; Feng, M. Research on Real-Time Monitoring and Warning Technology for Multi-Parameter Underground Debris Flow. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, W.; Feng, X.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, S.; Fu, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y. Prediction method of surface subsidence induced by block caving method based on UAV oblique photogrammetry. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 24630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Ma, S.; Lou, H.; Yuan, G.; Tan, L.; You, Z.; Wang, R.; Liu, L. Dynamic Management System of Mineral Resources Based on 3D Design and Collaborative Platform. Copp. Eng. 2025, 3, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, S.; Jiang, W.; Yu, X.; Li, J. Study on the Positioning Principle and Application of Microseismic Monitoring System in Fankou Lead-zine Mine. Min. Res. Dev. 2017, 37, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, S.; Shi, Y.; Cao, W. Development of Automatic Monitoring and Pre-warning Systemfor Groundwater in Fankou Lead-zinc Mine. Met. Mine 2015, 4, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Deng, H.; Wen, L.; Qin, Y.; Xu, X. Method for Identifying and Forecasting Mining-Induced Earthquakes Based on Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Microseismic Activities in Fankou Lead/Zinc Mine. Minerals 2022, 12, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Liu, X.; Ma, S.; Chen, S.; Zhen, Y.; Zhou, Y. Innovative Practice of LlMS Based on the CNAS System Standard. Met. Mine 2024, 1, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Zhai, H.; Ji, X.; Yang, Y.; Hu, W.; Sun, C. Thoughts on digital mine construction in Beiya open pit gold mine. Min. Metall. 2020, 29, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhao, Y. Remote monitoring application of semi-continuous waste rock transportation system for large open pit mine based on cloud platform. China Min. Mag. 2020, 29, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, C.; Zhang, D.; Lu, C.; Wang, L. Application of intelligent safety assessment and monitoring technology inShangfanggou Molybdenum Mine. Nonferrous Met. Min. Sect. 2021, 73, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J. Development and application of underground mineproduction monitoring system. Nonferrous Met. Min. Sect. 2015, 67, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Li, N.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Liu, X.; Men, D. Research on Information Model Construction Technology of Multi-source Heterogeneous Industrial Data Collaborative Management Based on OPC UA. Mach. Hydraul. 2024, 52, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Yu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Ma, G.; Liu, Y.; Tian, W.; Xian, J.; Cao, Y. Construction in Yimin Open pit Coal Mine Study on key technology and development prospect of intelligent mine. China Coal 2021, 47, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Zhao, J.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gu, Y.; Wu, T. Research and application of coal mine data center based on cloud platform. Therm. Power Gener. 2024, 53, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Liu, Q.; Xu, G.; Cai, R.; Chen, F. Application of GNSS+INS integrated navigation inmine auto-driving trucks. Bull. Surv. Mapp. 2022, 7, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, H.; Zhang, J.; Feng, R.; Wang, W.; Lan, Y.; Xu, Z. Surrounding rock failure analysis of retreating roadways and the control technique for extra-thick coal seams under fully-mechanized top caving and intensive mining conditions: A case study. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 97, 103241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, H.; Wang, S.; Dou, X.; Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Yang, S.; Wang, T.; Wang, S. A Feature Extraction Method Using Auditory Nerve Response for Collapsing Coal-Gangue Recognition. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, G.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, S.; Kuang, T.; Meng, E. Theory and key technologies for intelligent fully-mechanized top-coal caving faces ofannual production of millions of tons. Coal Sci. Technol. 2024, 52, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henriquez, V.; Calvo-Manzano, J.A.; Moreno, A.M.; Feliu, T.S. Agile-CMMI V2.0 alignment: Bringing to light the agile artifacts pointed out by CMMI. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2022, 82, 103610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vance, D.; Jin, M.; Price, C.; Nimbalkar, S.U.; Wenning, T. Smart manufacturing maturity models and their applicability: A review. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2023, 34, 735–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gökalp, M.O.; Gökalp, E.; Kayabay, K.; Koçyigit, A.; Eren, P.E. Data-driven manufacturing: An assessment model for data science maturity. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 60, 527–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gökalp, E.; Martinez, V. Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers. Comput. Ind. 2021, 132, 103522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.C.; Teijgeler, H.; Mun, D.; Han, S. Integration of distributed plant lifecycle data using ISO 15926 and Web services. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2011, 38, 2309–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, M.; González, M.; Amaro, A.; Fernández-Renau, A. Field Spectroscopy Metadata System Based on ISO and OGC Standards. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2014, 3, 1003–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Li, S.; Lin, Z.; Li, Q. Information modeling of mine working based on BIM technology. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 115, 103978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittal, S.; Khan, M.A.; Purohit, J.K.; Menon, K.; Romero, D.; Wuest, T. A smart manufacturing adoption framework for SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1555–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janowicz, K.; Haller, A.; Cox, S.J.D.; Phuoc, D.L.; Lefrançois, M. SOSA: A lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples, and actuators. J. Web Semant. 2019, 56, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haller, A.; Janowicz, K.; Cox, S.J.D.; Lefrançois, M.; Taylor, K.; Phuoc, D.L.; Lieberman, J.; García-Castro, R.; Atkinson, R.; Stadler, C. The modular SSN ontology: A joint W3C and OGC standard specifying the semantics of sensors, observations, sampling, and actuation. Semant. Web 2018, 10, 9–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Xu, Y.; Meng, X.; Fan, J.; Wu, Y.; Ren, H.; Pang, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhao, G.; Li, M. Specification, classification and grading evaluation index forsmart longwall mining face. J. China Coal Soc. 2020, 45, 3033–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zender, A.; Humm, B.G. Ontology-based Meta AutoML. Integr. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2022, 29, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S. Integrating multi-modal data into AFSA-LSTM model for real-time oil production prediction. Energy 2023, 279, 127935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, D.; Haase-Schutz, C.; Rosenbaum, L.; Hertlein, H.; Glaser, C.; Timm, F.; Wiesbeck, W.; Dietmayer, K. Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. 2021, 22, 1341–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, W.; Pei, C.; Wu, X.; Nie, Z. A sustainable development benchmarking framework for energy companies based on topic mining and knowledge graph: The case of oil and gas industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 196, 114350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Wu, J.; Ren, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Cai, J. A BN-based risk assessment model of natural gas pipelines integrating knowledge graph and DEMATEL. Process Saf. Envrion. 2023, 171, 640–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seddighi, S. CO2-based reconfigurable enhanced oil recovery using the oxy-fuel-fired boilers: Thermal and flow properties. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 1346–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koren, Y.; Shpitalni, M. Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J. Manuf. Syst. 2010, 29, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Name | Location | Scale | Intelligent Construction | Role and Impact |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dexing Copper Mine [58,59] | Jiangxi, China | Largest open-pit copper mine in Asia | Deployment of 3D digital mining platform; remote drilling and autonomous haulage; intelligent truck dispatch system | Realized integration of geological–mining data, and enhanced resource control precision; drilling/haulage efficiency reached 85% of manual level; enabled large-scale equipment coordination over 15 km2 |
Pulang Copper Mine [60,61,62] | Yunnan, China | Super-large underground copper mine | Mechanized mining and unmanned haulage; AI-based video and sound surveillance; full-process 3D visualization | Ensured uninterrupted operation under extreme weather; improved risk detection and early warning capability; strengthened safety transparency and control |
Fankou Lead-Zinc Mine [63,64,65,66,67] | Guangdong, China | Largest lead-zinc mine in Asia | Construction of high-speed data center; geological and resource digital management; intelligent safety training and risk control system | Enhanced data transmission and emergency response by >30%; improved resource utilization by 3%; established intelligent safety supervision framework |
Beiya Gold Mine [68,69] | Yunnan, China | Large open-pit gold mine | Mine data center and execution system; full-process digital mining software; integrated safety monitoring system | Enabled collaborative management of mining and processing; realized intelligent geological modeling and production design; achieved real-time hazard monitoring and environmental integration |
Shangfanggou Molybdenum Mine [70] | Henan, China | Large porphyry molybdenum deposit | Visual digital mining platform; truck dispatch and ore allocation system | Constructed a 3D visualized mining model; achieved integrated safety, production, and scheduling management |
Xingshan Iron Mine [71,72] | Hebei, China | Large underground iron mine | Autonomous underground transport; full automation of fixed systems; visual AI for security monitoring | Achieved unmanned control of transport and crushing; enabled unattended operation of fixed infrastructure; enhanced intrusion detection and safety automation |
Yimin Coal Mine [73,74,75] | Inner Mongolia, China | Large open-pit coal mine | Fully unmanned mining face; integrated business control platform | Reached 98.6% operation success rate and >80% manual efficiency; solved data fragmentation and enabled 24 h autonomous operation |
Tashan Coal Mine [76,77,78] | Shanxi, China | Large underground coal mine | Multi-system intelligent decision platform; mine-wide data integration center; comprehensive dispatch command center | Integrated ten major systems for real-time decision-making; achieved centralized data governance; enabled remote, unattended, full-process digital scheduling |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Z.; Bi, L.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, Z. Development Status and Trend of Mine Intelligent Mining Technology. Mathematics 2025, 13, 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132217
Wang Z, Bi L, Li J, Wu Z, Zhao Z. Development Status and Trend of Mine Intelligent Mining Technology. Mathematics. 2025; 13(13):2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132217
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Zhuo, Lin Bi, Jinbo Li, Zhaohao Wu, and Ziyu Zhao. 2025. "Development Status and Trend of Mine Intelligent Mining Technology" Mathematics 13, no. 13: 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132217
APA StyleWang, Z., Bi, L., Li, J., Wu, Z., & Zhao, Z. (2025). Development Status and Trend of Mine Intelligent Mining Technology. Mathematics, 13(13), 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132217