Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Block Adaptive Type-II Progressive Hybrid Censoring with Weibull Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Digital Economy Development on Regional Income Gaps: A Perspective on Multidimensional Inequality Decomposition and Threshold Effects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Diophantine Equations 2x ± (2kp)y = z2 and −2x + (2k3)y = z2

by
Yuan Li
*,
Torre Lloyd
and
Angel Clinton
Department of Mathematics, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(24), 4027; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12244027
Submission received: 5 December 2024 / Revised: 17 December 2024 / Accepted: 20 December 2024 / Published: 22 December 2024

Abstract

:
In this paper, we solve three Diophantine equations: 2 x ± ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 and 2 x + ( 2 k 3 ) y = z 2 with k 0 and prime p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) . We obtain all the non-negative integer solutions by using elementary methods and the database of elliptic curves in “The L-functions and modular forms database” (LMFDB).
MSC:
11A15; 11D61; 11D72; 14H52

1. Introduction

For various fixed pairs of integers ( a , b ) , the exponential Diophantine equations a x + b y = z 2 and a x b y = z 2 have received a lot of attention in recent decades [1,2,3,4,5,6]. A summary of the most recent works on the equation a x + b y = z 2 can be found in [2,4]. One can find a comprehensive study of exponential Diophantine equations in [7].
In Section 2, we list some results needed in the proof of our main theorems. In Section 3, we solve three Diophantine equations: 2 x ± ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 and 2 x + ( 2 k 3 ) y = z 2 with non-negative integer k and prime p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) . The author of [8] first solved the equation 2 x + 3 y = z 2 . When p = 5 , the equation 2 x ± ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 was solved in [9]. When p = 3 and k = 0 , 1 , the equation 2 x ± ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 was solved in [10]. We could not generally solve the equation 2 x + ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 since we need to use the database of [11]. But for p = 5 , it was solved in [9]. For p = 3 and k = 0 , 1 , it was also solved in [10]. Our works in this paper can be taken as a generalization of some results in [8,9,10]. We point out that our methods used in this paper can be applied to the equation 2 x + ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 for any specific value of prime p with p 3 , 5 , 7 ( mod 8 ) with the help of database LMFDB [11]. “elliptic curve cryptography” (ECC) is a type of public-key cryptography that utilizes the mathematical properties of elliptic curves. A future study of the equation 2 x + ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 with general p may have some potential applications in cryptography since these equations are related to elliptic curves.

2. Preliminaries

The following lemma was conjectured by Eugène Charles Catalan in 1844 and proved in 2002 by Preda Mihăilescu [12].
Lemma 1
(Catalan–Mihăilescu Theorem [12]). If a, b, x, and y are integers and min { a , b , x , y }   > 1 , then the Diophantine equation a x b y = 1 has a unique integer solution ( a , b , x , y ) = ( 3 , 2 , 2 , 3 ) .
In 2003, Leu and Li proved the following result [13].
Lemma 2
([13]). The Diophantine equation 2 x 2 + 1 = 3 y has exactly three positive rational integral solutions, namely ( x , y ) = ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 2 , 2 ) , and ( 11 , 5 ) .
The discriminant of the elliptic curve y 2 = x 3 + a x + b over Q is Δ = 16 ( 4 a 3 + 27 b 2 ) .
Using discriminant, the following lemma can be found in the database of elliptic curves in “The L-functions and modular forms database” (LMFDB) [11].
Lemma 3
([11]). The three elliptic curves over Q and their integer solutions are listed below.
(1) y 2 = x 3 2 has only two integer solutions ( x , y ) = ( 3 , ± 5 ) .
(2) y 2 = x 3 18 has only two integer solutions ( x , y ) = ( 3 , ± 3 ) .
(3) y 2 = x 3 162 has no integer solutions.

3. Solutions of the Equations 2 x ± ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 and 2 x + ( 2 k 3 ) y = z 2

In this section, we solve three Diophantine equations 2 x ± ( 2 k p ) y = z 2 and 2 x + ( 2 k 3 ) y = z 2 with k 0 and prime p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) .
In the proofs of the theorems, we frequently use the following facts which can be found in any standard elementary textbook.
(1): Let p be an odd prime and ( a p ) the Legendre symbol. We have ( 2 p ) = 1 if and only if p ± 1 (mod 8), or equivalently, ( 2 p ) = 1 if and only if p ± 3 (mod 8).
(2): For any odd number a, we have a 2 1 (mod 8).
Theorem 1.
For k 0 and prime p ± 3 (mod 8), the Diophantine equation
2 x + ( 2 k p ) y = z 2
has only the following non-negative integer solutions:
1.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( p , k , 3 , 0 , 3 ) ;
2.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 2 n ) ;
3.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n + 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 7 · 2 n 1 ) ;
4.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n + 1 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 5 · 2 n 1 ) ;
5.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , n 1 , 2 n + 2 , 2 , 5 · 2 n 1 ) ;
6.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 5 , 2 n 2 , 2 n , 1 , 3 · 2 n 1 ) ;
7.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 5 , 2 n + 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 9 · 2 n 1 ) ,
where n is any positive integer.
Proof. 
If y = 0 , then ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( p , k , 3 , 0 , 3 ) by Lemma 1.
For y 1 , through Equation (1), we have 2 x z 2 ( mod p ) . Hence, ( 2 p ) x = ( 1 ) x = ( z 2 p ) = 1 since p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) . Therefore, we obtain x = 2 m for some non-negative integer m. We write Equation (1) as
( z 2 m ) ( z + 2 m ) = 2 k y p y .
Letting d = gcd ( z 2 m , z + 2 m ) , we have d ( z + 2 m ) ( z 2 m ) = 2 m + 1 . Hence, d = 2 t , 0 t m + 1 . We also have d 2 ( z + 2 m ) ( z 2 m ) = 2 k y p y , so, 0 2 t k y . In summary, we obtain 0 t min { m + 1 , k y 2 } .
We have the following four possibilities, namely, z 2 m = 2 t , 2 t p y , 2 k y t , 2 k y t p y .
Case 1. z 2 m = 2 t and z + 2 m = 2 k y t p y .
In this case, we have 2 m + 1 = 2 k y t p y 2 t . Hence, 2 m + 1 t = 2 k y 2 t p y 1 . It is clear that m + 1 t = 0 is impossible since y 1 . For m + 1 t 1 , 2 m + 1 t is even. So is 2 k y 2 t p y 1 . Therefore, k y 2 t = 0 . So, we obtain 2 m + 1 t = p y 1 or p y 2 m + 1 t = 1 .
Case 1.1. y = 1 .
We have p = 2 m + 1 t + 1 . Since p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) , we obtain 1 m + 1 t 2 .
Case 1.1.1. m + 1 t = 1 .
We have m = t , x = 2 t . From k y 2 t = 0 , we have k = 2 t , z = 2 m + 2 t = 2 t + 1 . Letting n = t + 1 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 2 n ) .
Case 1.1.2. m + 1 t = 2 .
We have m = t + 1 , x = 2 t + 2 , k = 2 t , and z = 2 m + 2 t = 3 · 2 t . Letting n = t + 1 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 5 , 2 n 2 , 2 n , 1 , 3 · 2 n 1 ) .
Case 1.2. y 2 .
From p y 2 m + 1 t = 1 , we obtain 2 m + 1 t = p y 1 3 2 1 = 8 . Hence, we have m + 1 t 3 and min { p , 2 , y , m + 1 t } > 1 , we obtain p = 3 , y = 2 and m + 1 t = 3 by Lemma 1. Hence, m = t + 2 , x = 2 t + 4 , z = 2 m + 2 t = 5 · 2 t and k = t . Letting n = t + 1 , we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , n 1 , 2 n + 2 , 2 , 5 · 2 n 1 )
Case 2. z 2 m = 2 t p y and z + 2 m = 2 k y t .
In this case, we have 2 m + 1 = 2 k y t 2 t p y , so, 2 m + 1 t = 2 k y 2 t p y . If m + 1 t 1 , then k y 2 t = 0 since both sides must be even. We obtain 2 m + 1 t + p y = 1 , which is impossible. Hence, we obtain m + 1 t = 0 and 1 = 2 k y 2 t p y . Since y 1 , by Lemma 1, we know y = 1 and p = 2 k y 2 t 1 . If k y 2 t 3 , we obtain p 1 ( mod 8 ) which is contrary to p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) . So, k y 2 t = 2 , p = 3 , k = 2 t + 2 , m = t 1 , x = 2 t 2 and z = 2 m + 2 t p y = 2 t 1 + 3 · 2 t = 7 · 2 t 1 . Letting n = t since t 1 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n + 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 7 · 2 n 1 ) .
Case 3. z 2 m = 2 k y t and z + 2 m = 2 t p y .
In this case, we have 2 m + 1 = 2 t p y 2 k y t , so, 2 m + 1 t = p y 2 k y 2 t .
Case 3.1. m + 1 t = 0 .
We have p y 2 k y 2 t = 1 .
Case 3.1.1. y = 1 .
Since p = 2 k y 2 t + 1 ± 3 ( mod 8 ) , we obtain 1 k y 2 t 2 , there are two possibilities.
Case 3.1.1.1. k y 2 t = 1 .
We have m = t 1 , y = 1 , k = 2 t + 1 , p = 3 , x = 2 t 2 and z = 2 m + 2 k y t = 2 t 1 + 2 t + 1 = 5 · 2 t 1 . Letting n = t since t 1 , we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n + 1 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 5 · 2 n 1 ) .
Case 3.1.1.2. k y 2 t = 2 .
We have m = t 1 , y = 1 , k = 2 t + 2 , p = 5 , x = 2 t 2 and z = 2 m + 2 k y t = 2 t 1 + 2 t + 2 = 9 · 2 t 1 . Letting n = t since t 1 , we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 5 , 2 n + 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 9 · 2 n 1 ) .
Case 3.1.2. y 2 .
From p y 2 k y 2 t = 1 , since y 2 and p 3 , we obtain k y 2 t 2 . Hence, min { p , 2 , y , k y 2 t } > 1 . By Lemma 1, we obtain ( p , 2 , y , k y 2 t ) = ( 3 , 2 , 2 , 3 ) . Namely, k y 2 t = 2 k 2 t = 3 which is impossible. So, there is no solution in this case.
Case 3.2. m + 1 t 1 .
From 2 m + 1 t = p y 2 k y 2 t , we know k y 2 t = 0 since both sides are even. We obtain p y 2 m + 1 t = 1 .
Case 3.2.1. y = 1 .
We have p = 2 m + 1 t + 1 ± 3 ( mod 8 ) . Hence, m + 1 t = 1 , 2 .
Case 3.2.1.1. m + 1 t = 1 .
We obtain m = t , p = 3 , y = 1 , x = 2 t , k y = k = 2 t and z = 2 m + 2 k y t = 2 t + 2 t = 2 t + 1 . Letting n = t + 1 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n 2 , 2 n 2 , 1 , 2 n ) again (We obtain this solution first in Case 1.1.1.).
Case 3.2.1.2. m + 1 t = 2 .
We obtain m = t + 1 , p = 5 , y = 1 , x = 2 t + 2 , k y = k = 2 t and z = 2 m + 2 k y t = 2 t + 1 + 2 t = 3 · 2 t . Letting n = t + 1 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 5 , 2 n 2 , 2 n , 1 , 3 · 2 n 1 ) again (We obtain this solution first in Case 1.1.2.).
Case 3.2.2. y 2 .
In p y 2 m + 1 t = 1 , from y 2 , we obtain m + 1 t 2 . Hence, min { p , 2 , y , m + 1 t } > 1 . By Lemma 1, we know p = 3 , y = 2 , m + 1 t = 3 , k y = 2 k = 2 t . So, m = t + 2 , x = 2 t + 4 , z = 2 t + 2 + 2 t = 5 · 2 t . Letting n = t + 1 , we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , n 1 , 2 n + 2 , 2 , 5 · 2 n 1 ) again (we obtain this solution first in Case 1.2.).
Case 4. z 2 m = 2 k y t p y and z + 2 m = 2 t .
In this case, we have 2 m + 1 = 2 t 2 k y t p y . Hence, we have 2 m + 1 t + 2 k y 2 t p y = 1 , which is impossible. □
Theorem 2.
For k 0 and prime p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) , the Diophantine equation
2 x ( 2 k p ) y = z 2
has only the following non-negative integer solutions:
1.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( p , k , 0 , 0 , 0 ) ;
2.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( p , k , 1 , 0 , 1 ) ;
3.
( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n 2 , 2 n , 1 , 2 n 1 ) ,
where n is any positive integer.
Proof. 
For x = 0 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( p , k , 0 , 0 , 0 ) .
For x = 1 , we have ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( p , k , 1 , 0 , 1 ) .
From now on, we have x 2 . If y = 0 , then we obtain 1 z 2 ( mod 4 ) , which is absurd. Hence, we obtain y 1 . Taking module p in Equation (2), we obtain 2 x z 2 ( mod p ) . So x = 2 m for some integers, m 1 , since ( 2 p ) = 1 .
Equation (2) can be written as
( 2 m z ) ( 2 m + z ) = 2 k y p y .
Letting d = gcd ( 2 m z , 2 m + z ) , we have d 2 m + 1 and d 2 2 k y p y .
Hence, d = 2 t , 0 t min { m + 1 , k y 2 } .
There are four cases, namely, 2 m z = 2 t , 2 t p y , 2 k y t , 2 k y t p y .
Case 1. 2 m z = 2 t and 2 m + z = 2 k y t p y .
We have 2 m + 1 = 2 k y t p y + 2 t , or 2 m + 1 t = 2 k y 2 t p y + 1 .
It is clear that m + 1 t 1 and 2 m + 1 t is even. Hence, 2 k y 2 t p y + 1 is also even. So, we obtain k y = 2 t .
Now we have 2 m + 1 t = p y + 1 , or 2 m + 1 t p y = 1 . By Lemma 1, we obtain y = 1 and p = 2 m + 1 t 1 . Because p ± 3 ( mod 8 ) , we know m + 1 t = 2 . After simple calculation, we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 t , 2 t + 2 , 1 , 2 t ) . Letting n = t + 1 , we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n 2 , 2 n , 1 , 2 n 1 ) .
Case 2. 2 m z = 2 t p y and 2 m + z = 2 k y t .
We have 2 m + 1 = 2 t p y + 2 k y t , or 2 m + 1 t = p y + 2 k y 2 t .
It is clear that m + 1 t 1 . So, we obtain k y 2 t = 0 since both sides are even. Then 2 m z = 2 t p y > 2 k y t = 2 m + z , a contradiction. Hence, there is no solution in this case.
Case 3. 2 m z = 2 k y t and 2 m + z = 2 t p y .
We have 2 m + 1 = 2 k y t + 2 t p y , or 2 m + 1 t = 2 k y 2 t + p y .
It is clear that m + 1 t 1 and 2 m + 1 t is even. Hence, 2 k y 2 t + p y is also even. So, we obtain k y = 2 t .
Now we have 2 m + 1 t = p y + 1 , or 2 m + 1 t p y = 1 . By Lemma 1, we obtain y = 1 . Same as before, we have m + 1 t = 2 . After simple calculation, we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 t , 2 t + 2 , 1 , 2 t ) . Letting n = t + 1 , we obtain ( p , k , x , y , z ) = ( 3 , 2 n 2 , 2 n , 1 , 2 n 1 ) . This solution has been obtained in Case 1.
Case 4. 2 m z = 2 k y t p y and 2 m + z = 2 t .
Since 2 k y t p y > 2 t due to k y t t and y 1 , we obtain 2 m z > 2 m + z , a contradiction. Hence, there is no non-negative integer solution in this case. □
Theorem 3.
For k 0 , the Diophantine equation
2 x + ( 2 k 3 ) y = z 2
has only the following non-negative integer solutions:
1.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( k , 0 , 0 , 0 ) ;
2.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( n 1 , 2 n + 1 , 2 , 2 n 1 ) ;
3.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( n 1 , 4 n + 1 , 4 , 7 · 2 2 n 2 ) ;
4.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 1 , 2 n 1 , 1 , 2 n ) ;
5.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 1 , 10 n 5 , 5 , 88 · 2 5 n 5 ) :
6.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 2 , 6 n 5 , 3 , 5 · 2 3 n 3 ) ;
7.
( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 2 , 2 n 1 , 1 , 2 n 1 ) ,
where n is any positive integer.
Proof. 
If y = 0 , then ( k , x , y , z ) = ( k , 0 , 0 , 0 ) .
For y 1 , taking module 3 in Equation (3), we have ( 1 ) x + 1 z 2 ( mod 3 ) . It is clear that this congruence holds only if 2 x .
There are two cases, namely, 2 y and 2 y .
Case 1. 2 x and 2 y .
Letting y = 2 m , m 1 , we obtain ( 2 k m 3 m z ) ( 2 k m 3 m + z ) = 2 x , which implies 2 k m 3 m z = 2 t and 2 k m 3 m + z = 2 x t with 0 t < x t since z 0 .
So we have
2 k m + 1 t 3 m = 2 x 2 t + 1 .
Since the right side is odd, we obtain k m + 1 t = 0 and 3 m 2 x 2 t = 1 . By Lemma 1, we receive ( m , x 2 t ) = ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 2 , 3 ) .
For ( m , x 2 t ) = ( 1 , 1 ) , we obtain m = 1 , x = 2 t + 1 , k = t 1 , y = 2 and z = 2 t 1 . Letting n = t , we obtain a solution ( k , x , y , z ) = ( n 1 , 2 n + 1 , 2 , 2 n 1 ) .
For ( m , x 2 t ) = ( 2 , 3 ) , we obtain m = 2 , x = 2 t + 3 , 2 k + 1 = t , y = 4 and z = 7 · 2 t 1 . Hence, ( k , x , y , z ) = ( k , 4 k + 5 , 4 , 7 · 2 2 k ) .
Letting n = k + 1 , we obtain a solution ( k , x , y , z ) = ( n 1 , 4 n + 1 , 4 , 7 · 2 2 n 2 ) .
Case 2. 2 x and 2 y .
Let z = 2 t z 1 , where z 1 N , t 0 and 2 z 1 .
Case 2.1. k y > x .
From Equation (3), we obtain 2 x + ( 2 k 3 ) y = 2 2 t z 1 2 , 2 x ( 1 + 2 k y x 3 y ) = 2 2 t z 1 2 . Hence, we obtain x = 2 t , which is contrary to 2 x .
Case 2.2. k y = x .
From Equation (3), we obtain 2 x ( 1 + 3 y ) = 2 2 t z 1 2 , or 2 x + 1 ( 3 y 1 + + 3 + 1 ) = 2 2 t z 1 2 . Since 2 y , we know 3 y 1 + + 3 + 1 is odd. So, we obtain x + 1 = 2 t and
3 y = 2 z 1 2 + 1 .
By Lemma 2, we obtain ( y , z 1 ) = ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 5 , 11 ) .
For ( y , z 1 ) = ( 1 , 1 ) , we obtain y = 1 , x = 2 t 1 , k = 2 t 1 , z = 2 t . Letting n = t , we obtain the solution ( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 1 , 2 n 1 , 1 , 2 n ) .
For ( y , z 1 ) = ( 5 , 11 ) , we obtain x = 2 t 1 , y = 5 , z = 11 · 2 t . From k y = x , we obtian 5 k = 2 t 1 . Since k is odd, letting k = 2 k 1 + 1 , we obtain t = 5 k 1 + 3 . Letting k 1 = n 1 , we obtain the solution ( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 1 , 10 n 5 , 5 , 88 · 2 5 n 5 ) .
Case 2.3. k y < x .
From Equation (3), we obtain 2 k y ( 2 x k y + 3 y ) = 2 2 t z 1 2 . Both z 1 and 2 x k y + 3 y are odd. We obtain k y = 2 t and 2 x k y + 3 y = z 1 2 . If x k y 2 , we obtain z 1 2 ( 1 ) y 1 ( mod 4 ) , which is absurd. So, we obtain x k y 1 . Because k y = 2 t and x is odd, we obtain x k y = 1 . Now, we only need to solve the following equation
z 1 2 = 3 y 2 .
We consider three possibilities. Namely, y = 3 s , 3 s + 1 , 3 s + 2 .
Case 2.3.1. y = 3 s .
We have z 1 2 = 3 3 s 2 = ( 3 s ) 3 2 , by Lemma 3, we obtain ( 3 s , z 1 ) = ( 3 , ± 5 ) . So, we obtain s = 1 , z 1 = 5 , y = 3 , 3 k = 2 t , x = y k + 1 = 3 k + 1 = 2 t + 1 and z = 5 · 2 t . From 3 k = 2 t , we obtain t = 3 t 1 and k = 2 t 1 . Letting t 1 = n 1 , we obtain a solution ( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 2 , 6 n 5 , 3 , 5 · 2 3 n 3 ) .
Case 2.3.2. y = 3 s + 1 .
We have z 1 2 = 3 3 s + 1 2 , or ( 3 z 1 ) 2 = ( 3 s + 1 ) 3 18 ; by Lemma 3, we obtain ( 3 s + 1 , 3 z 1 ) = ( 3 , ± 3 ) . Hence, we have s = 0 , z 1 = 1 , y = 1 , z = 2 t , k = 2 t and x = k y + 1 = 2 t + 1 . Letting t = n 1 , we obtain a solution ( k , x , y , z ) = ( 2 n 2 , 2 n 1 , 1 , 2 n 1 ) .
Case 2.3.3. y = 3 s + 2 .
We have z 1 2 = 3 3 s + 2 2 , or ( 3 2 z 1 ) 2 = ( 3 s + 2 ) 3 162 by Lemma 3; there is no non-negative integer solution. □

Author Contributions

Investigation, T.L. and A.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support this study are openly available in reference [11].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the referees for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Borah, P.B.; Dutta, M. On the Diophantine equation 7x + 32y = z2 and its generalization. Integers 2022, 22, A29. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gayo, W.S.; Bacani, J.B. On the Diophantine equation (Mp)x + (Mq + 1)y = z2. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 14, 396–403. [Google Scholar]
  3. Le, M.H. A note on the Diophantine equation x2 + by = cz. Acta Arith. 1995, 71, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mina, R.J.S.; Bacani, J.B. On the solutions of the Diophantine equation px + (p + 4k)y = z2 for prime pairs p and p + 4k. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 14, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Terai, N. The Diophantine equation x2+qm = pn. Acta Arith. 1993, 63, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, P.Z.; Wang, J.B. On the Diophantine equation x2 + by = cz. Acta Arith. 1998, 84, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shorey, T.N.; Tijdeman, R. Exponential Diophantine Equations; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sroysang, B. More on the Diophantine equation 2x + 3y = z2. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2013, 84, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.X. On equations (−1)αpx + (−1)β(2k(2p + 1))y = z2 with Sophie Germain prime p. Involve 2024, 17, 503–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, J.; Li, Y. On the equation (−1)αpx + (−1)β(2k(2p − 1))y = z2 for prime pairs (p,2p − 1). Integers 2024, 24, A64. [Google Scholar]
  11. The L-Functions and Modular Forms Database (LMFDB). Available online: https://www.lmfdb.org/EllipticCurve/Q/ (accessed on 20 July 2024).
  12. Mihăilescu, P. Primary cycolotomic units and a proof of Catalan’s conjecture. J. Reine Angew. Math. 2004, 572, 167–195. [Google Scholar]
  13. Leu, M.G.; Li, G.W. On the Diophantine equation 2x2 + 1 = 3n. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2003, 131, 3643–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Lloyd, T.; Clinton, A. On Diophantine Equations 2x ± (2kp)y = z2 and −2x + (2k3)y = z2. Mathematics 2024, 12, 4027. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12244027

AMA Style

Li Y, Lloyd T, Clinton A. On Diophantine Equations 2x ± (2kp)y = z2 and −2x + (2k3)y = z2. Mathematics. 2024; 12(24):4027. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12244027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuan, Torre Lloyd, and Angel Clinton. 2024. "On Diophantine Equations 2x ± (2kp)y = z2 and −2x + (2k3)y = z2" Mathematics 12, no. 24: 4027. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12244027

APA Style

Li, Y., Lloyd, T., & Clinton, A. (2024). On Diophantine Equations 2x ± (2kp)y = z2 and −2x + (2k3)y = z2. Mathematics, 12(24), 4027. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12244027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop