Abstract
Let be a BiHom–Hopf algebra. First, we provide a non-trivial example of a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module and show that the category is a braided monoidal category. We also study the connection between the category and the category of the left co-modules over a coquasitriangular BiHom–bialgebra . Secondly, we prove that the category of finitely generated projective left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules is closed for left and right duality.
Keywords:
left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module; (coquasitriangular) BiHom-bialgebra; braiding; duality MSC:
16S40; 17D30
1. Introduction
In the 1990s, Hom-type algebras appeared in physics literature in the context of the quantum deformations of some algebras, such as the Witt and Virasoro algebras, in connection with oscillator algebras [,]. A quantum deformation replaced the usual derivation with a -derivation. The algebras obtained in such a way satisfy a modified Jacobi identity involving a homomorphism. Hartwig, Larsson, and Silvestrov in [,] called this kind of algebra a Hom–Lie algebra. Considering the enveloping algebras of the Hom–Lie algebras, the Hom-associative algebra was introduced in []. Another way to study Hom-type algebras was considered by categorical approach in [], these were called monoidal Hom-algebras. In order to unify these two kinds of Hom-type algebras, a generalization has been provided in [], where a construction of a Hom-category, including a group action, led to the concept of BiHom-type algebras. Hence, BiHom-associative algebras and BiHom–Lie algebras involving two linear structure maps were introduced. The main axioms for these types of algebras (BiHom-associativity, BiHom-skew-symmetry, and the BiHom–Jacobi condition) were dictated by categorical considerations.
Joyal and Street [] introduced the definition of a braided monoidal category (also known as a braided tensor category) to formalize the characteristic properties of the tensor categories of modules over braided bialgebras as well as the ideas of crossing in link and tangle diagrams. Since the braiding structure may be considered to be the categorical version of the famous Yang–Baxter equation (see []), it is worth constructing more braided monoidal categories. Moreover, it is well-known that the category of Yetter–Drinfeld modules is a braided monoidal category ([]).
The main aim of this paper is to conduct more studies of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules over BiHom–Hopf algebras. The definition of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules was introduced in [] and proved that the category of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules is a monoidal category. We will construct the braiding structure of the category . In order to obtain more properties and examples of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules, we prove that if is a left co-module over a coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebra (generalized the concepts in [,]), then becomes a left–left BiHom-Yetter-Drinfeld module over that BiHom-bialgebra, and the category of finitely generated projective left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules is closed for left and right duality.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the main definitions and properties of BiHom-algebras. In Section 3, we provide the braiding structure of the category of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules and discuss some elementary aspects. The results generalize the conditions in [] of the Hom-case. If is a coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebra with bijective structure maps, the category of left H-co-modules turns out to be a braided monoidal subcategory of the category .
In Section 4, we will show that if is a finitely generated projective left–left -BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module, then the left and right dualities of are also left–left -BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules. The special monoidal Hom-case can be found in [].
2. Preliminaries
In this paper all the algebras, linear spaces, etc., will occur over a base field, , with unadorned ⊗ means . The multiplication on a linear space V is denoted by juxtaposition: . For the co-multiplication on a linear space C, we use the Sweedler-type notation , for .
We recall now from [] several facts about BiHom-type structures.
Definition 1.
A BiHom-associative algebra is a 4-tuple , where A is a linear space and , and are linear maps such that , , , and
for all . The maps α and β (in this order) are called the structure maps of A, and condition (1) is called the BiHom-associativity condition.
A morphism of BiHom-associative algebras is a linear map , such that , , and .
A BiHom-associative algebra is called unital if there exists an element (called a unit) such that , and
Definition 2.
Let be a BiHom-associative algebra and a triple, where M is a linear space, and are commuting linear maps. is a left A-module if we have a linear map , , such that , , and
If and are left A-modules (both A-actions denoted by ·), a morphism of left A-modules is a linear map satisfying the conditions , and , for all and .
If is a unital BiHom-associative algebra and is a left A-module, then M is called unital if , for all .
Definition 3.
A BiHom-coassociative coalgebra is a 4-tuple , in which C is a linear space, and , and are linear maps, such that , , , and
The maps ψ and ω (in this order) are called the structure maps of C, and condition (3) is called the BiHom-coassociativity condition.
Let us record the formula expressing the BiHom-coassociativity of Δ:
A morphism of BiHom-coassociative coalgebras is a linear map , such that , , and .
A BiHom-coassociative coalgebra is called counital if there exists a linear map (called a counit) such that
Similar to Definition 4.3 in [], we define
Definition 4.
Let be a BiHom-coassociative coalgebra. A left C-co-module is a triple , where M is a linear space, are linear maps, and we have a linear map (called a coaction) , with notation , for all , such that the following conditions are satisfied:
If and are left C-co-modules with coactions and , respectively, a morphism of left C-co-modules is a linear map satisfying the conditions , , and .
Definition 5.
A BiHom-bialgebra is a 7-tuple , with the property that is a BiHom-associative algebra, is a BiHom-coassociative coalgebra, and, moreover, the following relations are satisfied, for all :
We say that H is a unital and counital BiHom-bialgebra if, in addition, it admits a unit and a counit such that
Let be a unital and counital BiHom-bialgebra with a unit and a counit . A linear map is called an antipode if it commutes with all the maps and it satisfies the following relation:
A BiHom–Hopf algebra is a unital and counital BiHom-bialgebra with an antipode.
We can obtain some properties of the antipode.
Remark 1.
Let be a BiHom–Hopf algebra, then
3. The Braiding Structure of the Category of BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld Modules
In this section, we show that the monoidal category of a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over a BiHom–Hopf algebra is braided and find that, if is a coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebra, then the category of left H-co-modules with bijective structure maps turns out to be a subcategory of the category .
Definition 6
([]). Let be a BiHom-bialgebra. is a left H-module with action , and is a left H-co-module with coaction . Then, is called a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over H if the following identity holds, for all :
Definition 7.
Let be a BiHom-bialgebra, such that are bijective. We denoted using the category whose objects are left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules over H, with bijective; the morphisms in the category are morphisms of left H-modules and left H-co-modules.
Proposition 1.
Let be a BiHom–Hopf algebra, such that the maps are bijective. itself is considered a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over H, by considering as a left H-co-module via the comultiplication and as a left H-module via the left adjoint action defined as .
From Proposition 1, we find that if we want to construct non-trivial examples of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module, we only need to construct examples of BiHom–Hopf algebras.
Example 1.
Let H be the linear space generated by with the commuting linear maps defined as
The multiplication is as follows:
| g | x | y | ||
| g | ||||
| g | g | |||
| x | y | 0 | 0 | |
| y | x | 0 | 0 |
is an unital BiHom-associative algebra with bijective. Next, we construct a counital BiHom-coassociative coalgebra , which is defined as
Furthermore, forms a BiHom-bialgebra. Define the antipode as . Thus, we obtain a BiHom–Hopf algebra From Proposition 1, is a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over H with the coaction and the action:
| ⇀ | g | x | y | |
| g | ||||
| g | g | |||
| x | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Proposition 2.
Let be a BiHom–Hopf algebra satisfying the maps bijective. The compatibility condition (9) for a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over H is equivalent to:
Proof.
The proof is finished. □
From [], we know the category is a monoidal category. Let , be two left–left Yetter-Drinfeld modules over H and define the linear maps · and as follows:
Then , these structures become a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over H, denoted by .
We discuss the braiding structure for the monoidal category in the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let be a BiHom–Hopf algebra with a bijective antipode . Then, the category is a braided monoidal category with the braiding
for .
Proof. 
We will first show that the braiding c is natural. For all , let be morphisms in and consider the diagram

For all , since the morphism g is left H-linear and f is left H-colinear, we obtain
This follows , and the diagram commutes.
Next, we prove the H-linear of :
and H-colinear of :
Now, we prove is an isomorphism with an inverse map
For all and , we compute
Similarly, we can prove .
Finally, let us verify the hexagon axioms from [], XIII.1.1. For any , we compute
and
The proof is finished. □
We discuss the connection between left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules and co-modules over coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebras in the following proposition. According to the definition of coquasitriangular bialgebra in [], we can generate the BiHom-case:
Definition 8.
Let be a BiHom-bialgebra and a linear map. We call a coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebra if, for all , we have
Proposition 3.
Let be a coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebra with the bijective, which satisfies the following condition
for all .
If is a left H-co-module with coaction , define a new linear map as , then , along with these structures, forms a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module over H.
If is another left H-co-module with coaction defined by , followed by a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module as in (i), via the module action , then we regard as a left H-co-module via the action and as a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module as in (i). This BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module coincides with the BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules defined above in Theorem 1.
Proof.
Now, we check if is a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module. In this case, the compatibility condition Equation (9) changes to
for all and . We compute:
(ii) From this, it is obvious that we have proven that the two module structures of coincide, that is, for all ,
We compute
finishing the proof. □
As a consequence of the above results, we also obtain the following:
Theorem 2.
Let be a coquasitriangular BiHom-bialgebra, where are bijective and is true, as in Proposition 3. Denoted by , the category whose objects are left H-co-modules with bijective and morphisms are morphisms of left H-co-modules. Then, is a braided monoidal subcategory of with a tensor product defined as and the braiding structure , for all .
4. The Duality of the Category of Finitely Generated Projective BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld Modules
In this section we will examine the idea that the category of finitely generated projective left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules has left and right duality. The definition of duality in a monoidal category can be found in [,].
Proposition 4.
Let be a BiHom–Hopf algebra with the maps bijective and be an object in the category and assume M is a finite dimensional. Then, is also a left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld module with the action
and coaction
here , for all and .
Proof.
We first check if is a left -module. We compute:
It follows that . Similarly, we find . For all and , we have
Next, we prove is a left -co-module. For all and , we obtain
Similarly, we have .
For all and , we compute Equation (5):
Finally we prove that the compatibility condition of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules holds. For all and we have:
From the above computation, we have
It follows that holds. Thus, the proof is finished. □
Proposition 5.
Let be an object in the category and assume M is a finite dimensional.The co-evaluation map,
where and have a dual basis in M and , and the evaluation map
are morphisms in the category .
Proof.
We first prove that the maps and are left -linear. For any and , we have
and
Next, we check if and are left -colinear. For any , and , we compute
and
The proof is finished. □
Now, we can obtain our main results.
Theorem 3.
The category of finitely generated projective left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules has left duality.
Similarly, we find that:
Theorem 4.
Let be an object in the category and assume M is a finite dimensional. Then, becomes an object in with the action
and coaction
where , for all and . Moreover, the maps , and are morphisms in the category . Thus, the category of finitely generated projective left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules has right duality.
5. Conclusions
This paper is a contribution to the study of BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules. The starting point was the following question: Are we able to provide more solutions for the Yang–Baxter equation? It is well known that the braiding structure of a braided monoidal category can be regarded as a solution. We examined the case of BiHom–Hopf algebras in this study; we investigated the braiding of the category of the BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules. Another way to characterize the BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules is from the Drinfeld double, and we will consider that connection in the future. The second aim of this paper was to provide another illustration of the category through the connection with the category and to study in the finitely generated projective case if the category is rigid.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.L.; Writing—original draft, L.L.; Writing—review & editing, B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LY20A010003) and the Project of Zhejiang College, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (No. 2021YJYB01).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank the referee for their valuable suggestions and comments on this paper. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LY20A010003) and the Project of Zhejiang College, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (No. 2021YJYB01).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Aizawa, N.; Sato, H. q-deformation of the Virasoro algebra with central extension. Phys. Lett. B 1991, 256, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, N. q-Witt algebras, q-Lie algebras, q-holomorph structure and representations. Algebra Colloq. 1999, 6, 51–70. [Google Scholar]
- Hartwig, J.T.; Larsson, D.; Silvestrov, S.D. Deformations of Lie algebras using σ-derivations. J. Algebra 2006, 295, 314–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Larsson, D.; Silvestrov, S.D. Quasi-hom-Lie algebras, central extensions and 2-cocycle-like identities. J. Algebra 2005, 288, 321–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Makhlouf, A.; Silvestrov, S.D. Hom-algebras structures. J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl. 2008, 2, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caenepeel, S.; Goyvaerts, I. Monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras. Commun. Algebra 2011, 39, 2216–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Graziani, G.; Makhlouf, A.; Menini, C.; Panaite, F. BiHom-associative algebras, BiHom-Lie algebras and BiHom-bialgebras. Symmetry Integr. Geom. Methods Appl. 2015, 11, 086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Joyal, A.; Street, R. Braided tensor categories. Adv. Math. 1993, 102, 20–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kassel, C. Quantum Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995; Volume 155. [Google Scholar]
- Schauenburg, P. Hopf modules and Yetter-Drinfeld modules. J. Algebra 1994, 169, 874–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, L.; Shen, B.L. The tensor product of left–left BiHom–Yetter–Drinfeld modules. Adv. Math. 2021, 50, 359–368. [Google Scholar]
- Schmüdgen, K. On coquasitriangular bialgebras. Comm. Algebra 1999, 27, 4919–4928. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, T.S.; Li, J.; Yang, T. Coquasitriangular infinitesimal BiHom-bialgebras and related structures. Commun. Algebra 2021, 49, 2423–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makhlouf, A.; Panaite, F. Yetter-Drinfeld modules for Hom-bialgebras. J. Math. Phys. 2014, 55, 013501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shen, B.L.; Liu, L. Center construction and duality of category of Hom-Yetter-Drinfeld modules over monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras. Front. Math. China 2017, 12, 177–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majid, S. Representations, duals and quantum doubles of monoidal categories. In Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Supplemento; Circolo Matematico di Palermo: Palermo, Italy, 1991; pp. 197–206. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).