Next Article in Journal
A Whole-School Approach to Outdoor Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Supporting Mature-Aged Early Childhood Students’ Online Learning in Australian Higher Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Exploratory Cross-National Study of K–12 Teachers’ Generative AI Literacy and Classroom Enactment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Teacher–AI Collaboration and the Professionalization of Teachers in the Age of Automation: A Systematic Review

by
Oana Costache
1,2,*,
Roald Pieter Verhoeff
1,2 and
Pierre Gorissen
1,3
1
National Education Lab Artificial Intelligence (NOLAI), Radboud University, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2
Radboud Teachers Academy, Radboud University, 6525 HT Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3
iXperium Centre of Expertise Teaching and Learning with ICT, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 938; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060938 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 April 2026 / Revised: 29 May 2026 / Accepted: 8 June 2026 / Published: 13 June 2026

Abstract

Teacher–AI collaboration is increasingly present in educational settings, yet little is known about how it is conceptualized in empirical research and what this implies for teacher preparation. This review synthesizes 39 empirical studies on teacher professionalization published between 2015 and 2025 to examine how responsibilities for detecting, diagnosing, and acting on educational data are distributed between teachers and AI systems. Results indicate a predominant focus on learning analytics and natural language processing tools, largely operating at intermediate to high levels of automation. In these configurations, teachers are primarily positioned as interpreters or monitors of AI outputs. In addition, our analysis identifies a consistent pattern: as AI systems assume greater pedagogical autonomy, teacher training described in the literature remains brief, procedural, and largely limited to technical familiarization. These findings suggest that different automation configurations entail distinct competence demands, and that teacher preparation must move beyond technical training to conceptualize teacher–AI collaboration as ongoing professional sensemaking within hybrid intelligent systems grounded in educational values.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; teacher training; teacher professional development; AIED artificial intelligence; teacher training; teacher professional development; AIED

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costache, O.; Verhoeff, R.P.; Gorissen, P. Teacher–AI Collaboration and the Professionalization of Teachers in the Age of Automation: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060938

AMA Style

Costache O, Verhoeff RP, Gorissen P. Teacher–AI Collaboration and the Professionalization of Teachers in the Age of Automation: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(6):938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060938

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costache, Oana, Roald Pieter Verhoeff, and Pierre Gorissen. 2026. "Teacher–AI Collaboration and the Professionalization of Teachers in the Age of Automation: A Systematic Review" Education Sciences 16, no. 6: 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060938

APA Style

Costache, O., Verhoeff, R. P., & Gorissen, P. (2026). Teacher–AI Collaboration and the Professionalization of Teachers in the Age of Automation: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 16(6), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060938

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop