Next Article in Journal
Motivational Factors Influencing Ethiopian Student Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Adopting AI in Education
Previous Article in Journal
Representations of Disability in Picturebooks: Issues of Inclusivity and Literary Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Do Talent Beliefs Differ Between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers?

1
Department of Educational Sciences, University of Education Stefan Zweig, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
2
ÖZBF, Department of Impulses in Education, University of Education Stefan Zweig, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
3
Department of Impulses in Education, University of Education Stefan Zweig, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
4
Department of Educational Sciences, Paris Lodron University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 799; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050799 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 April 2026 / Revised: 7 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 19 May 2026

Abstract

There is limited understanding regarding whether and how teachers’ talent beliefs evolve across career stages. While most prior research conceptualizes talent beliefs across domains, emerging frameworks emphasize field-specific talent beliefs. An established multidimensional model of talent beliefs provides a theoretically grounded structure for capturing these domain-specific perceptions. Yet comparative evidence across teacher career stages remains limited. Our study examines if verbal and mathematical talent beliefs among in-service teachers and pre-service teachers differ in terms of sources, structure and levels. A total of 307 in-service teachers and 215 pre-service teachers completed validated six-dimensional talent beliefs instruments for both domains and reported sources of their beliefs. Participants—especially pre-service teachers—most strongly attributed their talent beliefs to personal school experiences, while educational science and subject-didactic coursework played a marginal role. Both the mathematical and verbal talent belief scales demonstrated configural and metric invariance, supporting equivalent factor structures and factor loadings across pre-service teachers and in-service teachers. Latent mean comparisons showed that pre-service teachers hold systematically different talent beliefs in comparison to in-service teachers. In-service teachers emphasize talent beliefs concerning domain-specific skills and, for verbal talent, passion—consistent with contemporary talent development frameworks—whereas pre-service teachers focus on external teacher influence and, for mathematical talent, on internal factors. These findings reinforce theoretical claims that talent beliefs are experience-sensitive, multidimensional constructs shaped through socialization in educational contexts. Teacher (further) education should deliberately address the dominance of personal schooling experiences by fostering structured reflection, explicitly targeting belief formation in practice-based courses, and ensuring coherence between higher-education instruction and school-based experiences. Teachers’ impact on their students’ talent development should especially be reflected in further education, since in-service teachers assess their own influence as lower than pre-service teachers do; additionally, passion as a key driver of talent development and the relevance of talent domains should already be highlighted in initial teacher education.
Keywords: talent beliefs; professional development; pre-service teachers; in-service teachers; origin of talent beliefs; measurement invariance; latent mean differences talent beliefs; professional development; pre-service teachers; in-service teachers; origin of talent beliefs; measurement invariance; latent mean differences

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klug, J.; Rogl, S.; Hamader, K.C.; Gniewosz, B. Do Talent Beliefs Differ Between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers? Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050799

AMA Style

Klug J, Rogl S, Hamader KC, Gniewosz B. Do Talent Beliefs Differ Between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers? Education Sciences. 2026; 16(5):799. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klug, Julia, Silke Rogl, Kathrin Claudia Hamader, and Burkhard Gniewosz. 2026. "Do Talent Beliefs Differ Between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers?" Education Sciences 16, no. 5: 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050799

APA Style

Klug, J., Rogl, S., Hamader, K. C., & Gniewosz, B. (2026). Do Talent Beliefs Differ Between In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers? Education Sciences, 16(5), 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop