Previous Article in Journal
Charting the Pathway to STEM: How Middle School Socialization and Science Growth Trajectories Predict Adult Career Success
Previous Article in Special Issue
Students with Autism in Spain: Key Attitudes and Competences for Inclusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Self-Assessment of Teamwork Skills Among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Skills Scale

1
Institute of Education, University of Szeged, H-6723 Szeged, Hungary
2
MTA-SZTE Digital Learning Technologies Research Group, Institute of Education, University of Szeged, H-6723 Szeged, Hungary
3
School of Foreign Languages, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 167; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010167 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 September 2025 / Revised: 14 January 2026 / Accepted: 19 January 2026 / Published: 21 January 2026

Abstract

Monitoring the development of increasingly essential collaborative skills at the individual level within a classroom context requires effective, easy-to-use, and quick measurement tools. These tools should provide global feedback on the skillset rather than reflecting performance in a single group task. A self-rated questionnaire is a beneficial option for this purpose. The aim of our research is to develop a self-rated scale for adolescents, the Collaborative Skills Scale (CoSS), which provides a global assessment of students’ teamwork competence. Additionally, using our assessment instrument, we seek to explore what patterns adolescents’ self-ratings show to be connected to their collaborative skills. A total of 2128 Grade 8 students participated in our online data collection. The Collaborative Skills Scale was developed based on the collaborative problem-solving model of the ATC21S project. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded a reliable and structurally valid 18-item scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.90; χ2 = 1802.83, df = 132, p < 0.01; CFI = 0.944; TLI = 0.935; RMSEA = 0.077; SRMR = 0.031), which can provide educational practitioners with an effective formative assessment tool for monitoring and supporting the development of teamwork skills. Ideally, it should be utilized in combination with other instruments, such as peer- or teacher-rated scales, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of students’ collaborative skills. In line with previous findings, students tended to rate their teamwork skills above average. The implications of this potentially biased self-evaluation among adolescents in terms of collaborative competence are discussed.
Keywords: collaborative skills; teamwork skills; self-rated questionnaire; adolescents; online assessment collaborative skills; teamwork skills; self-rated questionnaire; adolescents; online assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pásztor-Kovács, A.; Pásztor, A.; Liu, Y.; Molnár, G. Self-Assessment of Teamwork Skills Among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Skills Scale. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010167

AMA Style

Pásztor-Kovács A, Pásztor A, Liu Y, Molnár G. Self-Assessment of Teamwork Skills Among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Skills Scale. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(1):167. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010167

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pásztor-Kovács, Anita, Attila Pásztor, Yong Liu, and Gyöngyvér Molnár. 2026. "Self-Assessment of Teamwork Skills Among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Skills Scale" Education Sciences 16, no. 1: 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010167

APA Style

Pásztor-Kovács, A., Pásztor, A., Liu, Y., & Molnár, G. (2026). Self-Assessment of Teamwork Skills Among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Skills Scale. Education Sciences, 16(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010167

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop