Next Article in Journal
Preparing for Multilingual Classrooms in Ireland: What Do Student Teachers Need to Know?
Previous Article in Journal
Open and Hidden Voices of Teachers: Lived Experiences of Making Updates to Preschool Curriculum Provoked by the National Guidelines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

A Systematic Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Math and Science Teacher Recruitment and Retention

by
Janet Solis Rodriguez
Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(8), 1073; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081073
Submission received: 8 July 2025 / Revised: 15 August 2025 / Accepted: 15 August 2025 / Published: 20 August 2025

Abstract

The shortage of math and science teachers is a pressing issue in the United States (US) and globally. This review closely follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and synthesizes findings from 43 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2005 and 2024 on the recruitment and retention of math and science teachers, offering a new perspective for understanding and mitigating math and science teacher shortages. This review revealed (a) the qualifications and characteristics of math and science teachers who enter and remain in the teaching profession; (b) that financial incentives, experiential learning, mentorship, and professional development are commonly used strategies and mechanisms to recruit and retain math and science teachers; and (c) that psychological, sociocultural, and working conditions are factors that influence math and science teachers’ decisions to enter and remain in the teaching field. While this review primarily focuses on the US context, it offers valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and other key stakeholders worldwide by identifying strategies, mechanisms, and factors that shape teacher recruitment and retention in math and science. This review also discusses gaps in the literature, directions for future research, and implications for research, policy, and practice that emerge from the empirical evidence.
Keywords: teacher; math; science; recruitment; retention; STEM teacher; math; science; recruitment; retention; STEM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Solis Rodriguez, J. A Systematic Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Math and Science Teacher Recruitment and Retention. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081073

AMA Style

Solis Rodriguez J. A Systematic Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Math and Science Teacher Recruitment and Retention. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(8):1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Solis Rodriguez, Janet. 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Math and Science Teacher Recruitment and Retention" Education Sciences 15, no. 8: 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081073

APA Style

Solis Rodriguez, J. (2025). A Systematic Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Math and Science Teacher Recruitment and Retention. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop