Next Article in Journal
Community-Integrated Project-Based Learning for Interdisciplinary Engineering Education: A Mechatronics Case Study of a Rideable 5-Inch Gauge Railway
Previous Article in Journal
The Interplay of Mindset, Feedback Perception, and Academic Emotion Regulation in Undergraduates’ Self-Regulated Writing Ability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Guide for Fostering Parent–Child Math Talk and Play During Shared Book-Reading Across Diverse Genres

by
Deborah Bergman Deitcher
1,* and
Michelle M. Neumann
2,3
1
International Liberal Arts Program, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6997801, Israel
2
School of Education, University of Sheffield, The Wave, 2 Whitham Rd, Broomhall, Sheffield S10 2AH, UK
3
Faculty of Education, Southern Cross University, Terminal Dr, Gold Coast, Bilinga QLD 4225, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070805
Submission received: 2 May 2025 / Revised: 3 June 2025 / Accepted: 20 June 2025 / Published: 23 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Early Childhood Education)

Abstract

This theoretical paper expands upon previous research and proposes a guide for promoting mathematical talk and play through shared book reading (SBR), with a focus on the home environment. Building on a previously developed classroom-based model, this article describes a design-based research approach to extend the guide to including diverse literary genres—such as narrative, informational, multicultural, and math-specific books in a home setting. Parent–child shared book-reading in authentic contexts can provide a rich platform for “math talk”, where references are made to mathematical words, concepts, and content, and may support children’s mathematical skills. SBR with quality children’s literature can play a promising role in motivating and engaging children’s interest and pleasure in both reading and mathematics. However, few studies have explored this with diverse literary genres in the home setting, as the main focus has been in the classroom and using books specifically written to teach math content such as counting or sorting books. The proposed guide provides direction and practical examples for fostering parent–child math talk and play activities that can be used to extend concepts covered during the SBR. The potential application of the SBR guide, and how it can encourage parent–child talk to support a full range of mathematical concepts, encourage home-preschool collaboration, promote effective SBR techniques, and facilitate parent–child conversations about math in new and confident ways is discussed.

1. Introduction

During preschool years, children’s intellectual, cognitive, and emotional development grows significantly and future academic success has been attributed to this stage in life (Ansari et al., 2020; Lipkin et al., 2020; Pace et al., 2019). One area that reflects this is how early mathematical knowledge relates to children’s later mathematical outcomes (Jordan et al., 2009). There is extensive longitudinal evidence documenting that early mathematical skills relates to children’s academic outcomes in their school years (e.g., Bailey et al., 2020; D. H. Clements et al., 2016; Duncan et al., 2007), even through high school (Watts et al., 2014). Moreover, early intervention promoting math skills was associated with better achievement in fourth and fifth grade (Watts et al., 2018). To support the development of early mathematical skills, researchers recommend that preschoolers be provided with early learning opportunities that extend beyond traditional math activities such as counting out blocks or using flashcards (Piasta et al., 2014). Activities in authentic contexts that provide opportunities for “math talk”, where references are made to mathematical words, concepts, and content, may support a wide range of children’s emergent mathematical skills like number sense, which is the knowledge and ability to be flexible and fluent about numbers (L. J. Clements et al., 2021; R. Hojnoski et al., 2016; Son & Hur, 2020; Susperreguy & Davis-Kean, 2016). One activity that can provide a ready-made platform for math talk, is adult–child shared book-reading (SBR), where an adult reads a book with a child/children and engages with them in conversation surrounding the book content (e.g., Uscianowski et al., 2020). This frequent adult–preschooler interaction has been shown to promote young children’s language, literacy, and socio-emotional development (Anderson et al., 2019; Hindman et al., 2019; Schapira & Aram, 2020), and initial research suggests that SBR can facilitate children’s math capabilities (Purpura et al., 2021; Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen et al., 2016). SBR with quality children’s literature can play a promising role in motivating and engaging children’s interest and pleasure in both reading and mathematics. Few studies have explored this with diverse literary genres (e.g., narratives, informational, biographies) and the key focus has been in the classroom and using books specifically written to teach math content such as counting or sorting books (Hendrix et al., 2019; Stites et al., 2021).

2. Supporting Mathematical Learning at Home

According to Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems model, children develop within multiple systems, ranging from the microsystem—which relates to their more immediate environment, and the mesosystem—interactions between microsystems such as home and preschool, to the macrosystem—including broader contexts such as cultural elements. Various terminology has been applied to the microsystem of the home setting that relates more specifically to math learning, such as the home learning environment (Eason et al., 2022; Melhuish et al., 2008), home numeracy environment (LeFevre et al., 2009), and home math environment (Zippert & Rittle-Johnson, 2020). Home environments that include math activities and foster children’s interest in math can promote positive mathematical outcomes for young children (Eason et al., 2022; Sonnenschein & Dowling, 2019). For example, Susperreguy et al. (2020) found that both formal and informal math activities were related to preschooler’s longitudinal growth in math achievement. Parental practices such as SBR were also shown to relate to children’s math achievement and promote young children’s mathematical development (Op ‘t Eynde et al., 2023).
Barnes and Puccioni (2017) found that higher-quality parent talk during SBR was associated with children’s mathematics achievement, while Purpura et al. (2021) demonstrated that caregiver–child shared reading of math-focused picturebooks promoted children’s mathematical language and numeracy skills. Elia et al. (2010) highlighted the utility of the pictures and illustrations in books for promoting children’s mathematical thinking and Uscianowski et al. (2020) showed that parents asked more abstract and decontextualized questions when relating to characters’ actions on storybook pages without math content compared to when they related to math concepts such as shape and number. However, these studies primarily focused on researcher-designed books that included specific mathematical content aimed at increasing parents’ math talk during the SBR interaction (Purpura et al., 2021) or on books that contained significant quantities of embedded math content (Elia et al., 2010; Uscianowski et al., 2020). Our guide proposes that books of diverse genres (e.g., narrative, informational, multicultural), and not just those specifically connected to math, can be used to promote parent–child math talk during SBR. This approach may capitalize on the common practice of parent–child SBR (e.g., bedtime stories) that occurs across various cultures.

3. SBR, Play, and Diverse Genres

Parents and teachers play an important role in scaffolding children’s SBR experiences and learning within their Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky, 1978), helping children internalize knowledge about the world through repeated scaffolding so they can apply what they have learned (e.g., words, concepts, skills) in different contexts (Neumann, 2020; Pentimonti & Justice, 2010). Research indicates that SBR discourse varies based on book genre. For example, narrative storybooks tend to promote adult-child talk surrounding socio-emotional aspects of the book, while informational books tend to promote more vocabulary and content knowledge-related discussions (Bergman Deitcher & Johnson, 2022; Schapira et al., 2021). SBR of math books or books with specific math content can promote adults’ math talk (e.g., Purpura et al., 2021). For example, R. L. Hojnoski et al. (2014) trained parents to engage in discussion relating to math during SBR and found that three of the six parent–child dyads increased in their math talk compared to the baseline. Extending this study, Hendrix et al. (2019) reported that when given both math book and non-math books, three dyads engaged in more math talk when reading the math books compared to the non-math books. In a recent systematic review, Zhang et al. (2023) showed that using picturebooks across age groups and in the classroom for teaching math was associated with a positive learning environment, better math performance, and may promote more interactive learning.
Increasing research has focused on the concept of “playful learning” (Fletcher et al., 2024; Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2010; Levenson et al., 2018), which can promote children’s learning in various domains, including academic (Masters et al., 2023) and social-emotional skills (Taylor & Boyer, 2020). In terms of mathematics, guided play improved preschoolers’ shape knowledge compared to free play or didactic instruction (Fisher et al., 2013). Moreover, playful interactions with preschool teachers can engage children’s mathematical thinking and promote their math achievement (e.g., Trawick-Smith et al., 2016). Although some intervention studies have brought math games into the home setting (Ramani & Scalise, 2020), much of the play-based learning research has focused on the preschool setting as a pedagogical or curricular approach (e.g., Cohrssen et al., 2013).
In addition, diverse multicultural literature has been an important tool to help young children see their own real-life and authentic experiences reflected in picture books, or learn about other cultures, and can stimulate children’s imagination (Bishop, 1990). Multicultural literature and illustrations can be used to foster children’s appreciation of diversity, connect children with rich language and different cultures and encourage critical consciousness (Osorio, 2018). At the same time, as with other children’s literary genres, multicultural literature also may have the potential to support children’s math talk, and it is possible that adults may require more guidance in how to use non-focused math books, multicultural stories, and play-related activities to support children’s learning of math and other concepts during SBR. While there is extensive research on parent–child SBR, including some exploring various book genres, there is minimal exploration of how the different genres can be harnessed for math talk. The proposed “SBR math talk” guide discussed below may help fill this gap, extending previous research on shared reading by highlighting how various book genres can be used to promote math talk, along with play-based authentic parent–child interactions.

4. The SBR Math Talk Guide

We previously developed a framework for using classroom-based SBR of quality award-winning narrative books to promote children’s mathematical thinking in early education settings (Bergman Deitcher & Neumann, 2023). However, as the home environment is an important context for young children’s learning, the aim of the present work was to extend this work to include diverse children’s book genres, with a specific focus on parent–child SBR as little work has explored using SBR of non-math focused books to support math talk and associated concepts. SBR with different and diverse genres of quality children’s literature has the potential to expand children’s imagination and help them learn about the world.
Relying upon the process model proposed by Hoadley and Campos (2022), this design-based research approach enabled the extension of an earlier framework (Bergman Deitcher & Neumann, 2023) to other book genres and the home setting, incorporating play-based activities as part of the conceptualization. The design-based research process involved the authors’ covering four iterative cycles to extend the guide: Grounding, Conjecturing, Iterating, and Reflecting. Grounding began with analyzing existing research on SBR and its potential for fostering math talk with young children in the home context. This included a particular look at R. L. Hojnoski et al. (2014) and Hendrix et al. (2019), which utilized a SBR intervention as a means of promoting parents’ math talk. Drawing on this analysis, the researchers conjectured about key elements and strategies for integrating math talk into the SBR of picture books. These strategies were based on a dialogic approach of asking literal and inferential questions, discussing the meaning of new words in the context of the book, providing content knowledge, and connecting to the child’s life, which have been linked to children’s developmental outcomes, such as language and literacy skills, reading enjoyment and motivation, and mathematical knowledge (Hindman et al., 2019; Pillinger & Vardy, 2022; Purpura et al., 2017; Whitehurst et al., 1988).
The guide, which included a discussion of six relevant elements (in no specific order—genre, book title, emergent math concepts, text, math talk, and play-based activities), was then presented as part of a workshop titled “Playful mathematics learning during the early years: out-of-school environments.” The workshop included approximately 15 mathematics researchers, early education specialists, and other experts in the field, a number of whom were also parents. Workshop participants received a selection of books of various genres and provided feedback on the book, emergent math concepts, elements from the text and potential math talk. The workshop participants were asked to consider both the books and the reader guide as if they were engaging in shared reading. Iterative cycles followed, where the conjectured guide was reviewed, discussed, and evaluated as part of the workshop. Participants noted certain math concepts that had not been considered, such as large numbers and comparisons. They also noted potential “math talk” relating to the books. For example, for the information book Owls (Gibbons, 2006), participants suggested “Is the round face of the owl a circle” as a utilization of math talk. Based upon the feedback, the guide was refined by adding in further concepts including large numbers, symmetry, comparisons, and the idea of including multicultural books to make the guide more accessible to families from different backgrounds. Following each iteration, the researchers identified areas for improvement and revised the guide accordingly. This process continued and a robust guide for math-focused SBR emerged, encompassed by the general elements depicted in Figure 1 and examples for each book genre detailed in Table 1.

5. The Six Elements of the SBR Math Talk Guide

Parents and those working with families (e.g., teachers, therapists, intervention specialists) can be directed on how to use the guide and select books that can promote math talk (see Figure 1). More specifically, books do not need to have a particular math focus in the title or on the cover as research has shown that when selecting books, parents should take into consideration children’s interests and personal experiences and illustrations (Bergman Deitcher et al., 2019; Daniels et al., 2022). This approach is embedded in the proposed SBR guide to assist in broadening parents’ book selection criteria when selecting books for SBR that stimulate math talk. Parents can first examine the genre of the book, along with the title, author, and synopsis, taking their children’s interests, and their goals in reading into consideration. Parents can learn to look for signposts of emergent math concepts in the book—are there elements that can be counted? Are there words that signal quantity or relative size. Once the book is selected, parents can read through the text to become familiar with it and imagine the possible math talk—types of questions and prompts they can ask their child about different math concepts (see Table 1 for examples). Finally, play-based activities are also included, which can be incorporated during and following SBR to further extend opportunities for child–adult math talk and revisiting math concepts discussed during SBR. In general, adults read the same book multiple times with young children (Frey & Fisher, 2018), which is an effective way to revisit ideas and concepts that emerged from the math talk on the different pages of a book.
Table 1. Examples of shared book reading and play activities to support math talk and children’s mathematical thinking.
Table 1. Examples of shared book reading and play activities to support math talk and children’s mathematical thinking.
GenreBook Title and AuthorSynopsisEmergent Math ConceptsTextExamples of “Math Talk”Play Activities
NarrativeWhere the Wild Things Are by Maurice SendakAfter making mischief and chasing his dog down the stairs, Max is sent to his room, where he sails to an island and becomes king of all the Wild Things…until he returns home.Calendar, time, distance“…sailed off through night and day, and in and out of weeks and almost over a year”“How long is a week?”; “How many weeks in a year?”; “What would Max need to take with him in his boat if he was going on a long trip?”; “How much of each thing would he need?”When it is bathtime and you are splashing in the water, imagine the bath is Max’s boat and you are travelling with Max to the island. Talk with your child about how long it would take to get there and how much food you would need to survive the watery journey.
NarrativeI Want My Hat Back by Jon KlassenA bear has lost his hat and asks each of the other animals if they have seen his hat, until something jogs his memory.Shapes, ordering“I saw a hat once. It was blue and round…it is red and pointy.”“What kind of shape do you see in the picture here?”; “Does that look blue and round?”; “Which animal do you think he’s doing to go to next?”Find hats belonging to each family member. Then, count and order them in size. Play hide and seek hats where someone hides them around the house and the person who can find the most hats wins!
NarrativeSeven Blind Mice by Ed YoungSix colored blind mice individually set out to explore a strange “something.” The seventh mouse discovers that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.Ordering, counting“The sixth to go was Blue Mouse.”“Let’s see if we can remember the order the mice went”; Let’s count the mice in this picture”Find a board game in your home that has dice. Each time you roll the dice, count up the number of dots on the dice, then count together as you move your counter on the board game. Then, ask whose turn is it next to roll the dice! If you do not have a board game, have a go at creating your own with cardboard and crayons!
InformationAnimals in Winter by Henrietta Bancroft and Richard G. Van GelderThe book provides information on a variety of animals and what they do in the winter (migrate, change color, etc.).Time, sequence, cardinality, symmetry“Does he sleep for a day? Longer than that. Does he sleep for a week? Longer than that. A month? Even longer! A woodchuck can sleep as long as four months!”“Look at the picture here, it shows the months when the woodchuck is sleeping. December, January, February, March. Do you know what month comes next? When do you think he wakes up?”Take a wall calendar and look at what the months are—which month is the child’s birthday or other family members’ events?
InformationOwls by Gail GibbonsDetailed information about types of owls, where they live, their size, and their behaviors.Time (day/night), shapes, categorization, measurements“The smallest owl, the elf owl, is 5 inches (12.5 cm) long… Most owls hunt at night. Day or night, they can see much better than people.”“5 inches, that’s pretty small. Do you know how big you are? Should we measure you?”; “Wow, owls hunt at night—what do you do at night?”Take animal toys (e.g., teddy bears, farm animals) from the child’s bedroom and line them up by size. Which is the largest? Which is the smallest? Maybe find a tape measure and measure the height and width of the toys.
Math contentTen Black Dots by Donald CrewsVarious actions that can be performed with a black dot, counting from 1 to 10.Counting, fractions, addition, division“Six dots can make marbles that you hold—half are new, the rest are old.”“Let’s see how many are in this hand, and how many are in that hand. So if we want to take six and divide it into two equal parts, we get three and another three.” “Let’s count: 1, 2…”In the kitchen, find some fruits (e.g., grapes, plums, oranges, or apples) and count them and share them between two people. Ask, if we have grapes, how many do you and I need to pick out so we have an equal number of grapes each? Count the two sets of grapes, then eat them!
Math contentCounting to Bananas by Carrie TillotsonA humorous counting book with a banana “narrator” who wants his turn in the spotlight.Counting; large numbers“13 melons, 14 peaches, 15 kumquats, 16 leeches. Ew. Well you didn’t like the other animals…
If I have to see one more animal in a fruit books, I am going to go completely BANANAS.”
“40 cherries, 60 grapes, 80 berries”
“Do you think we can count all the melons? Let’s try.”; “Wow, 80 berries, that’s a lot. I don’t think we can count that on the page!”At the grocery store or fruit store, count each banana in the bunch, then keep counting more of your favorite fruits as you place them in your shopping bag or cart. If you lose count, you need to start again!
MulticulturalSammy Spider’s First Passover by Sylvia RoussSammy the Spider learns about that holiday of Passover while also learning how to spin a new web.Counting, shapes“… He was hovering on a silky strand above the table watching the Shapiros at their seder. CRUNCH went the matzah, as Mr. Shapiro broke it in half. Sammy watched him wrap one of the broken pieces in a bright red napkin.”“Look, he took one square piece of matzah, and now it’s in two triangles”. Let us see what else we can take from a square and make triangles. How about we make sandwiches for lunch. We can cut my square sandwich into two triangles. What shapes can we cut your sandwich into to get four smaller pieces? Let’s mix up the shapes, count them and make a jigsaw puzzle, then gobble them up!
MulticulturalThe Coloured Echidna by Eunice DayA young echidna who has quills that change to match all the rainbow colors goes on a journey across Australia to discover why he is different.Matching, size, shapes, quantity, distance, patterns, sequencing, counting“Coloured echidna was not happy. Wherever he went his quills changed to match the landscape. But he could never look like the other echidnas. No matter how hard he tried, his rainbow colors always shone through”“What different types of colors and shapes can you see in the picture of the echidna’s spiky quills? Look at all the dark and light stripes on his back. Let’s count those stripes. What a wonderful pattern! Why do you think the echidna has a pattern on his back?” When going out and about to the park, zoo or a visiting a natural setting (e.g., beach, forest), point out the different patterns and shapes in your surroundings (e.g., on an animal’s fur such as a striped cat) or a leaf with lines and relate that back to the echidna story and the colorful patterns in the landscape.
Importantly, linking SBR and play has been found to be beneficial for promoting children’s learning and fostering parent–child interactions (Mendelsohn et al., 2018; Weisleder et al., 2019). Parents can be encouraged to view SBR as a type of guided play, where scaffolded learning takes place within a pleasurable activity in which they may already engage (Landry et al., 2012). The addition of playful activities suggested in Table 1 can foster engaging ways for promoting math talk through SBR and extended play activities.

6. Discussion

The proposed SBR math talk guide, developed through a design-based research approach in consultation with math education experts, has the potential to provide enhanced opportunities for parent–child math talk. Although focused on parents (or other caregivers), the use of the proposed guide raises the potential for collaboration between the home and preschool microsystems (Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2006). SBR across a child’s home and school setting greatly supports early learning of foundational skills (Hindman et al., 2008). However, research has shown some variation between home and school in that parents use different SBR strategies than teachers, providing different SBR experiences for children. For example, when reading at home, children may benefit from more personalized opportunities for SBR math talk interactions with their parent or caretaker, whereas at preschool, children tend to engage in more whole class and group-based interactive experiences with their peers and a trained preschool teacher (Grolig, 2020). To harness these positive SBR experiences across home and school, parents and teachers can collaborate and share the SBR knowledge they have with others so that children’s home and school SBR math talk experiences could be enhanced and revisited in both settings. Through this collaborative and coordinated home–school process (Susperreguy & Davis-Kean, 2016), parents and preschool teachers could discuss the math concepts that are being covered at preschool and then aim to talk about these concepts during SBR at home. Similarly, the same picture books can be read both at home and at preschool, allowing for the continuity and repetition of math talk conversations for the child. The guide (Table 1) may be a useful tool that both parents and teachers can utilize to harness quality picture books and SBR for supporting early math learning.
In both the home and preschool settings, elements of the SBR math guide may provide additional opportunities to support children’s learning and promote math. For instance, SBR allows for the use of more decontextualized or distancing talk, which goes beyond the “here and now,” which is associated with children’s learning (Grolig, 2020; Sun et al., 2020). Ribner et al. (2020) found that mothers’ distancing language during SBR was associated not only with children’s literacy skills, but also with their math skills. The authors suggested that this kind of language may promote more abstract thinking that not only applies to language or literacy, but to other areas such as math. Our proposed guide includes various examples of decontextualized talk such as text-to-child statements that encourage children to go beyond the here and now, such as by reminiscing about a past event or making links to everyday activities. Additionally, studies have found that questioning practices are also associated with levels of elaboration and children’s language skills (Blewitt & Langan, 2016; Walsh & Hodge, 2018). Open-ended questions are generally considered to be more cognitively demanding and may promote children’s inferential thinking and language learning (Deshmukh et al., 2019; Hindman et al., 2012). For instance, Duong et al. (2021) showed that parents’ increased use of higher cognitive demand questions was associated with better spatial skills and higher standardized math scores. The authors explain that “high-CD [cognitive demand] questions may promote abstract thinking and complex language use, which are involved in spatial and mathematical reasoning” (p. 26). The variety of question types in the proposed guide, including those that are higher cognitive demand, such as asking “why” or asking for a prediction, lends strength to the guide (Table 1).
By bringing math talk into a frequent playful interaction in families, the proposed SBR guide can serve as a direction for scaffolding important parent–child interactions. Indeed, parents who have a welcoming attitude toward math may be more likely to help their child engage in math activities at home and use more math language (Susperreguy et al., 2020). Such positive parent attitudes to math have been reported to relate to children’s higher math ability and performance (e.g., Becker et al., 2022). As some parents may be anxious about engaging with math (Schaeffer et al., 2018; Soni & Kumari, 2017), it is important to provide them with enjoyable and practical ways to talk with children about math in the home environment. Although speculative, using SBR may have the potential to help alleviate math anxiety because parents and children can relate the story back to their own personal experiences where math is interwoven into daily lives and experiences. If parents already see the value in SBR, they may already be familiar with some quality picture books from diverse genres. Therefore, parents could adopt some of the approaches in Table 1, such as discussing how long it might take Max to travel by boat to the island of Wild Things, then relate that back to their everyday experiences (e.g., talking to their child about distance and the time needed to take the city ferry boat to travel to a destination). Therefore, the SBR experience may also act as a prompt or conversation starter for children to talk with others and learn more about math. By discovering these real-life math connections through SBR, both parents and children may be provided with more ways to experience and talk about math in new and confident ways.
Despite the various opportunities the guide may provide, it has yet to be tested within the natural home environment. Further, there are certain possible barriers to the implementation of the guide, including parents’ education and language and literacy levels, especially if English is their second language. Similarly, parents from lower socio-economic backgrounds may find accessing and selecting diverse children’s picture books more challenging. Parents may also be restricted by time constraints or a lack of confidence and knowledge, leading to reluctance in adopting the SBR math guide, and some parents might prioritize literacy skills over math skills or have different cultural beliefs about approaching math teaching at home. Similarly, parents may have a particular goal in mind for SBR, such as fostering reading or bonding with their child (e.g., Audet et al., 2008; Leyva et al., 2021), and including too many topics in SBR may be overwhelming for children or their parents. Parents also might require additional coaching on how to engage their children in SBR; therefore, further support from policymakers, community initiatives, and preschools might be required to help address these challenges. Taking these potential limitations into consideration, the next step to the current design-based research study of developing the guide would be to empirically test it with parents and preschoolers, which we plan to complete in a future study. Soliciting parental feedback on the guide and making necessary adjustments can also contribute to greater implementation and effectiveness. A controlled study design with participant groups and standardized measures is needed to provide a clearer understanding of the direct impact and effects of the proposed SRB math guide on early math learning in the home environment. In addition, it is essential to continue testing the guide with parents and preschool children across a range of diverse communities in order to ecologically validate it as a practical tool to guide and support the early learning of math during home-based SBR activities.

7. Conclusions

The proposed SBR math talk guide, which integrates aspects of diverse genres and play into SBR, has the potential to be adopted by parents to use to foster math talk with their child. However, future research is needed to empirically examine parents’ implementation of the guide in authentic interaction in the home alongside children’s outcomes. Such future research would also need to consider providing parents with math talk coaching to ensure they have the confidence to select quality genres of children’s literature and identify if the books they select for SBR would interest their child and have the potential to provide opportunities for math talk within playful and real life settings.

Author Contributions

Both authors were involved in the conceptualization, writing, and editing of the manuscript. D.B.D. was involved in presenting to the workshop and incorporating the feedback prior to writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for any stage of this research and paper preparation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were not applicable for this paper as the research did not involve humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their thanks to the workshop participants for their participation and feedback on the SBR Math Talk Framework.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that there are no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, K. L., Atkinson, T. S., Swaggerty, E. A., & O’Brien, K. (2019). Examining relationships between home-based shared book reading practices and children’s language/literacy skills at kindergarten entry. Early Child Development and Care, 189(13), 2167–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ansari, A., Pianta, R. C., Whittaker, J. V., Vitiello, V. E., & Ruzek, E. A. (2020). Persistence and convergence: The end of kindergarten outcomes of pre-K graduates and their nonattending peers. Developmental Psychology, 56(11), 2027–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Audet, D., Evans, M. A., Williamson, K., & Reynolds, K. (2008). Shared book reading: Parental goals across the primary grades and goal–behavior relationships in junior kindergarten. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 112–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bailey, D. H., Duncan, G. J., Cunha, F., Foorman, B. R., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Persistence and fade-out of educational-intervention effects: Mechanisms and potential solutions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(2), 55–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barnes, E., & Puccioni, J. (2017). Shared book reading and preschool children’s academic achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study—Birth cohort. Infant and Child Development, 26(6), e2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Becker, M., Litkowski, E. C., Duncan, R. J., Schmitt, S. A., Elicker, J., & Purpura, D. J. (2022). Parents’ math anxiety and mathematics performance of pre-kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Pscyhology, 214, 105302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bergman Deitcher, D., Aram, D., & Adar, G. (2019). Book selection for shared reading: Parents’ considerations and researchers’ views. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 19(3), 291–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bergman Deitcher, D., & Johnson, H. (2022). Parents and children reading together: Expanding shared book-reading across genres. Journal of International Education and Practice, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bergman Deitcher, D., & Neumann, M. M. (2023). Discovering the hidden value of shared storybook reading to nurture preschoolers’ early mathematical thinking. Practical Literacy: The Early and Primary Years, 28(1), 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishop, R. S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6(3), ix–xi. [Google Scholar]
  11. Blewitt, P., & Langan, R. (2016). Learning words during shared book reading: The role of extratextual talk designed to increase child engagement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner, & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  14. Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & Germeroth, C. (2016). Learning executive function and early mathematics: Directions of causal relations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Clements, L. J., LeMahieu, R. A., Nelson, A. E., Eason, S. H., & Dearing, E. (2021). Associations between parents’ number talk and management language with young children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cohrssen, C., Church, A., Ishimine, K., & Tayler, C. (2013). Playing with maths: Facilitating the learning in play-based learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Daniels, D., Salley, B., Walker, C., & Bridges, M. (2022). Parent book choices: How do parents select books to share with infants and toddlers with language impairment? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 22(2), 279–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deshmukh, R. S., Zucker, T. A., Tambyraja, S. R., Pentimonti, J. M., Bowles, R. P., & Justice, L. M. (2019). Teachers’ use of questions during shared book reading: Relations to child responses. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 49, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duong, S., Bachman, H. J., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Libertus, M. E. (2021). What’s in a question? Parents’ question use in dyadic interactions and the relation to preschool-aged children’s math abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 211, 105213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eason, S. H., Scalise, N. R., Berkowitz, T., Ramani, G. B., & Levine, S. C. (2022). Widening the lens of family math engagement: A conceptual framework and systematic review. Developmental Review, 66, 101046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Elia, I., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Georgiou, A. (2010). The role of pictures in picture books on children’s cognitive engagement with mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(3), 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fisher, K. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Taking shape: Supporting preschoolers’ acquisition of geometric knowledge through guided play. Child Development, 84(6), 1872–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fletcher, K., Wright, C. A., Pesch, A., Abdurokhmonova, G., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2024). Active playful learning as a robust, adaptable, culturally relevant pedagogy to foster children’s 21st century skills. Journal of Children and Media, 18(3), 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2018). Addressing unintended instructional messages about repeated reading. The Reading Teacher, 71(4), 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gibbons, G. (2006). Owls. Holiday House. [Google Scholar]
  27. Grolig, L. (2020). Shared storybook reading and oral language development: A bioecological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 555603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hendrix, N. M., Hojnoski, R. L., & Missall, K. N. (2019). Shared book reading to promote math talk in parent–child dyads in low-income families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(1), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hindman, A. H., Connor, C. M., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Untangling the effects of shared book reading: Multiple factors and their associations with preschool literacy outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 330–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hindman, A. H., Wasik, B. A., & Bradley, D. E. (2019). How classroom conversations unfold: Exploring teacher–child exchanges during shared book reading. Early Education and Development, 30, 478–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hindman, A. H., Wasik, B. A., & Erhart, A. C. (2012). Shared book reading and Head Start preschoolers’ vocabulary learning: The role of book-related discussion and curricular connections. Early Education & Development, 23(4), 451–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L. E., & Singer, D. G. (2010). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hojnoski, R., Polignano, J., & Columba, H. L. (2016). Increasing teacher mathematical talk during shared book reading in the preschool classroom: A pilot study. Early Education and Development, 27(5), 676–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hojnoski, R. L., Columba, H. L., & Polignano, J. (2014). Embedding mathematical dialogue in parent–child shared book reading: A preliminary investigation. Early Education and Development, 25(4), 469–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early mathematics matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., Swank, P. R., Zucker, T., Crawford, A. D., & Solari, E. F. (2012). The effects of a responsive parenting intervention on parent-child interactions during shared book reading. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 969–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. LeFevre, J. A., Skwarchuk, S. L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Home numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(2), 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Levenson, E., Bartolini-Bussi, M., & Erfjord, I. (2018). Early years mathematics. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education—Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 106–114). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  40. Leyva, D., von Suchodoletz, A., Shroff, D., Hinojo, A., & Kärtner, J. (2021). Maternal book-sharing styles and goals and children’s verbal contributions in three communities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lipkin, P. H., Macias, M. M., & AAP Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. (2020). Promoting optimal development: Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders through developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 145(1), e20193449. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Masters, A. S., Scott, M. E., Wright, C. A., Spiewak Toub, T., Dickinson, D. K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2023). Playing with words: Using playful learning experiences in the early childhood classroom to build vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 76(6), 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Melhuish, E. C., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mendelsohn, A. L., Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., Johnson, S. B., Seery, A. M., Canfield, C. F., Huberman, H. S., & Dreyer, B. P. (2018). Reading aloud, play, and social-emotional development. Pediatrics, 141, e20173393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Neumann, M. M. (2020). Teacher scaffolding of preschoolers’ shared reading with a storybook app and a printed book. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(3), 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Op ‘t Eynde, E., Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Torbeyns, J. (2023). Shared picture book reading in early mathematics: A systematic literature review. Journal Fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 44, 505–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Osorio, S. L. (2018). Multicultural literature as a classroom tool. Multicultural Perspectives, 20(1), 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pace, A., Alper, R., Burchinal, M. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2019). Measuring success: Within and cross-domain predictors of academic and social trajectories in elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pentimonti, J. M., & Justice, L. M. (2010). Teachers’ use of scaffolding strategies during read alouds. Early Childhood Educational Journal, 37, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Piasta, S. B., Pelatti, C. Y., & Miller, H. L. (2014). Mathematics and science learning opportunities in preschool classrooms. Early Education and Development, 25, 445–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pillinger, C., & Vardy, E. J. (2022). The story so far: A systematic review of the dialogic reading literature. Journal of Research in Reading, 45(4), 533–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Purpura, D. J., Napoli, A. R., Wehrspann, E. A., & Gold, Z. S. (2017). Causal connections between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge: A dialogic reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 116–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., Napoli, A. R., Dobbs-Oates, J., King, Y. A., Hornburg, C. B., Westerberg, L., Borriello, G. A., Bryant, L. M., Anaya, L. Y., Kung, M., Litkowski, E., Lin, J., & Rolan, E. (2021). Engaging caregivers and children in picture books: A family-implemented mathematical language intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramani, G. B., & Scalise, N. R. (2020). It’s more than just fun and games: Play-based mathematics activities for head start families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ribner, A. D., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Liben, L. S. (2020). Mothers’ distancing language relates to young children’s math and literacy skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 196, 104863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schaeffer, M. W., Rozek, C. S., Berkowitz, T., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2018). Disassociating the relation between parents’ math anxiety and children’s math achievement: Long-term effects of a math app intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1782–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Schapira, R., & Aram, D. (2020). Shared book reading at home and preschoolers’ socio-emotional competence. Early Education and Development, 31(6), 819–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Schapira, R., Bergman Deitcher, D., & Aram, D. (2021). Variability and stability in parent–child discourse during and following repeated shared book reading. Reading and Writing, 34(1), 273–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Son, S. H. C., & Hur, J. H. (2020). Parental math talk during home cooking and math skills in head start children: The role of task management talk. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(3), 406–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Soni, A., & Kumari, S. (2017). The role of parental math anxiety and math attitude in their children’s math achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(2), 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sonnenschein, S., & Dowling, R. (2019). Parents’ socialization of their young children’s interest in math. In O. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research on motivation in early childhood education (pp. 75–100). Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  62. Stites, M. L., Sonnenschein, S., Dowling, R., & Gay, B. (2021). Mathematics learning opportunities in preschool: Where does the classroom library fit in? Early Education and Development, 32(1), 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, H., Toh, W., & Steinkrauss, R. (2020). Instructional strategies and linguistic features of kindergarten teachers’ shared book reading: The case of Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(2), 427–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Susperreguy, M. I., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2016). Maternal math talk in the home and math skills in preschool children. Early Education and Development, 27(6), 841–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Susperreguy, M. I., Douglas, H., Xu, C., Molina-Rojas, N., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2020). Expanding the home numeracy model to Chilean children: Relations among parental expectations, attitudes, activities, and children’s mathematical outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Taylor, M. E., & Boyer, W. (2020). Play-based learning: Evidence-based research to improve children’s learning experiences in the kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Trawick-Smith, J., Swaminathan, S., & Liu, X. (2016). The relationship of teacher–child play interactions to mathematics learning in preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 186(5), 716–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Uscianowski, C., Almeda, M. V., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2020). Differences in the complexity of math and literacy questions parents pose during storybook reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Elia, I., & Robitzsch, A. (2016). Effects of reading picture books on kindergartners’ mathematics performance. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 323–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  71. Walsh, R. L., & Hodge, K. A. (2018). Are we asking the right questions? An analysis of research on the effect of teachers’ questioning on children’s language during shared bookreading with young children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 264–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2018). What is the long-run impact of learning mathematics during preschool? Child Development, 89(2), 539–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Weisleder, A., Cates, C. B., Harding, J. F., Johnson, S. B., Canfield, C. F., Seery, A. M., Raak, C. D., Alonso, A., Dreyer, B. P., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2019). Links between shared reading and play, parent psychosocial functioning, and child behavior: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Pediatrics, 213, 187–195.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture-book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, Q., Sun, J., & Yeung, W.-Y. (2023). Effects of using picture books in mathematics teaching and learning: A systematic literature review from 2000–2022. Review of Education, 11(1), e3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zippert, E. L., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2020). The home math environment: More than numeracy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A guide to promoting math talk during SBR.
Figure 1. A guide to promoting math talk during SBR.
Education 15 00805 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bergman Deitcher, D.; Neumann, M.M. A Guide for Fostering Parent–Child Math Talk and Play During Shared Book-Reading Across Diverse Genres. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070805

AMA Style

Bergman Deitcher D, Neumann MM. A Guide for Fostering Parent–Child Math Talk and Play During Shared Book-Reading Across Diverse Genres. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(7):805. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bergman Deitcher, Deborah, and Michelle M. Neumann. 2025. "A Guide for Fostering Parent–Child Math Talk and Play During Shared Book-Reading Across Diverse Genres" Education Sciences 15, no. 7: 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070805

APA Style

Bergman Deitcher, D., & Neumann, M. M. (2025). A Guide for Fostering Parent–Child Math Talk and Play During Shared Book-Reading Across Diverse Genres. Education Sciences, 15(7), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop