Next Article in Journal
Digital and Digitized Interventions for Teachers’ Professional Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Work Engagement and Burnout Using the Job Demands–Resources Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Linking International Faculty Integration to International Academic Impact: The Moderating Role of Institutional Digitization Level in Chinese Universities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment

Institute for Research in Open and Innovative Education, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070798
Submission received: 16 April 2025 / Revised: 18 June 2025 / Accepted: 18 June 2025 / Published: 20 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Topic AI Trends in Teacher and Student Training)

Abstract

This study explores undergraduate students’ attitudes towards generative AI tools in higher education and their perspectives on the future of jobs. It aims to understand the decision-making processes behind adopting these emerging technologies. A multidimensional model based on the technology acceptance model was developed to assess various factors, including perceived ease of use, perceived benefits, perceived concerns, knowledge of AI, and students’ perceptions of generative AI’s impact on the future of jobs. Data were collected through a survey distributed to 93 undergraduate students at a university in Hong Kong. The findings of multiple regression analyses revealed that these factors collectively explained 23% of the variance in frequency of use [(F(4, 78) = 5.89, p < 0.001), R2 = 0.23]. Perceived benefits played the most significant role in determining frequency of use of generative AI tools. While students expressed mixed attitudes toward the role of AI in the future of jobs, those who voiced concerns about AI in education were more likely to view generative AI as a potential threat to job availability. The results provide insights for educators and policymakers to promote the effective use of generative AI tools in academic settings to help mitigate risks associated with overreliance, biases, and the underdevelopment of essential soft skills, including critical thinking, creativity, and communication. By addressing these challenges, higher education institutions can better prepare students for a rapidly evolving, AI-driven workforce.
Keywords: generative AI; technology acceptance model; risks; future of jobs; higher education; student attitudes generative AI; technology acceptance model; risks; future of jobs; higher education; student attitudes

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, K.C.; Chong, G.H.L.; Wong, B.T.M.; Wu, M.M.F. A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070798

AMA Style

Li KC, Chong GHL, Wong BTM, Wu MMF. A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(7):798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Kam Cheong, Grace Ho Lan Chong, Billy Tak Ming Wong, and Manfred Man Fat Wu. 2025. "A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment" Education Sciences 15, no. 7: 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070798

APA Style

Li, K. C., Chong, G. H. L., Wong, B. T. M., & Wu, M. M. F. (2025). A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment. Education Sciences, 15(7), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop