From Cadavers to Neural Networks: A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence Tools in Anatomy Teaching
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Artificial Intelligence (AI)
1.2. Traditional Anatomy Teaching and AI Potential
2. AI Tools in Anatomy Teaching
3. Methods
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. AI in Anatomy Teaching
4.1.1. AI-Powered Interactive 3D Anatomical Models
4.1.2. AI-Powered Virtual Reality (VR) Dissection
4.1.3. AI-Powered Personalized 3D Printing
4.1.4. AI-Powered Multilingual Anatomy Tutor
4.1.5. AI-Based Teaching Platforms with Immediate Feedback
4.2. AI in Histology Teaching
4.2.1. PathXL
4.2.2. Virtual Slide Platforms
4.2.3. Whole-Slide Imaging Also Called Virtual Microscopy
4.2.4. AI-Powered 3D Reconstruction
4.2.5. Chatbots and Interactive Platforms
4.3. AI in Anatomical Medical Imaging
5. Challenges and Considerations of AI Applications
6. Future Directions
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial intelligence |
ML | Machine learning |
DL | Deep learning |
UPSOM | The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine |
NLP | Natural language processing |
VR | Virtual reality |
WSI | Whole-slide imaging |
CT | Computed tomography |
MRI | Magnetic resonance imaging |
US | Ultrasonography |
TB | Tuberculosis |
LLM | Large language model |
References
- Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P., . . . Zheng, X. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. arXiv, arXiv:1605.08695. [Google Scholar]
- Abdellatif, H., Mushaiqri, M. A., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S. (2022). Teaching, learning and assessing anatomy with artificial intelligence: The road to a better future. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Gailani, S. (2016). The “Ice Age” of anatomy and obstetrics: Hand and eye in the promotion of frozen sections around 1900. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 90(4), 611–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, Y., Al-Mansour, M., Al-Saffar, R., Garman, A., & Al-Radadi, A. (2020). Three-dimensional Virtual reality as an innovative teaching and learning tool for human anatomy courses in Medical Education: A Mixed Methods study. Cureus, 12(2), e7085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almansi, A. A., Sugarova, S., Alsanosi, A., Almuhawas, F., Hofmeyr, L., Wagner, F., Kedves, E., Sriperumbudur, K., Dhanasingh, A., & Kedves, A. (2024). A novel radiological software prototype for automatically detecting the inner ear and classifying normal from malformed anatomy. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 171, 108168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Rahbi, A., Al-Mahrouqi, O., & Al-Saadi, T. (2024). Uses of artificial intelligence in glioma: A systematic review. Medicine International, 4(4), 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arantes, M., Arantes, J., & Ferreira, M. A. (2018). Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arun, G., Perumal, V., Urias, F. P. J. B., Ler, Y. E., Tan, B. W. T., Vallabhajosyula, R., Tan, E., Ng, O., Ng, K. B., & Mogali, S. R. (2024). ChatGPT versus a customized AI chatbot (Anatbuddy) for anatomy education: A comparative pilot study. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(7), 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asad, M. R., Mutairi, A. A., AlZahrani, R. E., Ahmed, M. M., Nazeer, M., & Taha, M. (2023). Role of living anatomy in medical education: A narrative review. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 15(Suppl. S2), S843–S845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayache, N. (2021). Digital anatomy. In Human-computer interaction series. Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barger, J. B., Resuehr, D., & Edwards, D. N. (2023). Radiology for anatomy educators: Success of an online, 2-day course for radiology training. Anatomical Sciences Education, 16(5), 958–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, A. S., Marcon, M., Ghafoor, S., Wurnig, M. C., Frauenfelder, T., & Boss, A. (2017). Deep learning in mammography. Investigative Radiology, 52(7), 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betmouni, S. (2021). Diagnostic digital pathology implementation: Learning from the digital health experience. Digital Health, 7, 20552076211020240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bork, F., Stratmann, L., Enssle, S., Eck, U., Navab, N., Waschke, J., & Kugelmann, D. (2019). The benefits of an augmented Reality Magic Mirror system for integrated radiology teaching in gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(6), 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buzzaccarini, G., Degliuomini, R. S., Borin, M., Fidanza, A., Salmeri, N., Schiraldi, L., Di Summa, P. G., Vercesi, F., Vanni, V. S., Candiani, M., & Pagliardini, L. (2024). The promise and pitfalls of AI-Generated anatomical images: Evaluating midjourney for aesthetic surgery applications. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 48(9), 1874–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellano, M. S., Contreras-McKay, I., Neyem, A., Farfán, E., Inzunza, O., Ottone, N. E., Del Sol, M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Alvarado, M. S., & Tubbs, R. S. (2023). Empowering human anatomy education through gamification and artificial intelligence: An innovative approach to knowledge appropriation. Clinical Anatomy, 37(1), 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, K. S., & Zary, N. (2019). Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: Integrative review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative. (n.d.). ITK-SNAP home. ITK-SNAP. Available online: http://www.itksnap.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php (accessed on 11 October 2024).
- Chen, C. P., Clifford, B. M., O’Leary, M. J., Hartman, D. J., & Picarsic, J. L. (2019). Improving medical students’ understanding of pediatric diseases through an innovative and tailored web-based digital pathology program with philips Pathology tutor (Formerly PathXL). Journal of Pathology Informatics, 10(1), 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D., Zhang, Q., Deng, J., Cai, Y., Huang, J., Li, F., & Xiong, K. (2018). A shortage of cadavers: The predicament of regional anatomy education in mainland China. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(4), 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chheang, V., Sharmin, S., Márquez-Hernández, R., Patel, M., Rajasekaran, D., Caulfield, G., Kiafar, B., Li, J., Kullu, P., & Barmaki, R. L. (2024, January 17–19). Towards anatomy education with generative AI-based virtual assistants in immersive virtual reality environments. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and eXtended and Virtual Reality (AIxVR) (pp. 21–30), Los Angeles, CA, USA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, B. R., Black, E. W., & Rarey, K. E. (2024). Introducing AnatomyGPT: A customized artificial intelligence application for anatomical sciences education. Clinical Anatomy, 37(6), 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DENVER & zSpace, Inc. 2024 June 24. zSpace introduces zSpace AI: Enhancing education with artificial intelligence. zSpace. Available online: https://zspace.com/newsroom/zspace-introduces-zspace-ai-enhancing-education-with-artificial-intelligence (accessed on 14 October 2024).
- Dissabandara, L. O., Nirthanan, S. N., Khoo, T. K., & Tedman, R. (2015). Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: A study on student perceptions. Anatomy & Cell Biology, 48(3), 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., & Houlsby, N. (2020). An image is worth 16 × 16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv, arXiv:2010.11929. [Google Scholar]
- Explosion. (n.d.). spaCy industrial-strength natural language processing in Python. SpaCY. Available online: https://spacy.io/ (accessed on 14 October 2024).
- Fan, X., Li, M., Rolker, H., Li, Y., Du, J., Wang, D., & Li, E. (2022). Knowledge, attitudes and willingness to organ donation among the general public: A cross-sectional survey in China. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frsa, C. D. 2024 January 30. Growth of coursera through AI. LinkedIn. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/growth-coursera-through-ai-carl-dawson-frsa-yygme#:~:text=Coursera%20has%20used%20AI%20for,personalized%20learning%20companion%20named%20Coach (accessed on 14 October 2024).
- Gallifant, J., Fiske, A., Strekalova, Y. A. L., Osorio-Valencia, J. S., Parke, R., Mwavu, R., Martinez, N., Gichoya, J. W., Ghassemi, M., Demner-Fushman, D., McCoy, L. G., Celi, L. A., & Pierce, R. (2024). Peer review of GPT-4 technical report and systems card. PLoS Digital Health, 3(1), e0000417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganske, I., Su, T., Loukas, M., & Shaffer, K. (2006). Teaching methods in anatomy courses in North American medical schools. Academic Radiology, 13(8), 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habbal, O. (2017). The science of anatomy: A historical timeline. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 17(1), e18–e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilgaz, H. B., & Çelik, Z. (2023). The significance of artificial intelligence platforms in anatomy education: An experience with ChatGPT and Google Bard. Cureus, 15, e45301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwanaga, J., Loukas, M., Dumont, A. S., & Tubbs, R. S. (2020). A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacques, S. (2024). Body donation for medical education and training: The importance of cadavers in teaching anatomy. Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 106(5), 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, C., Udupa, J. K., Zhao, L., Tong, Y., Odhner, D., Pednekar, G., Nag, S., Lewis, S., Poole, N., Mannikeri, S., Govindasamy, S., Singh, A., Camaratta, J., Owens, S., & Torigian, D. A. (2022). Object recognition in medical images via anatomy-guided deep learning. Medical Image Analysis, 81, 102527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayser, K., GĂśrtler, J., Bogovac, M., Bogovac, A., Goldmann, T., Vollmer, E., & Kayser, G. (2010). AI (artificial intelligence) in histopathology—From image analysis to automated diagnosis. Folia Histochemica Et Cytobiologica, 47(3), 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, D. Z., Valetopoulou, A., Das, A., Hanrahan, J. G., Williams, S. C., Bano, S., Borg, A., Dorward, N. L., Barbarisi, S., Culshaw, L., Kerr, K., Luengo, I., Stoyanov, D., & Marcus, H. J. (2024). Artificial intelligence assisted operative anatomy recognition in endoscopic pituitary surgery. NPJ Digital Medicine, 7(1), 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khasawneh, R. R. (2021). Anatomy education of medical students during the COVID 19 pandemic. International Journal of Morphology, 39(5), 1264–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D., Pantanowitz, L., Schüttler, P., Yarlagadda, D. V. K., Ardon, O., Reuter, V. E., Hameed, M., Klimstra, D. S., & Hanna, M. G. (2020). (Re) defining the High-Power Field for digital pathology. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 11(1), 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, I., Kang, K., Song, Y., & Kim, T. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence in Pathology: Trends and challenges. Diagnostics, 12(11), 2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kramer, B. (2023). Challenges to sourcing human bodies for teaching and research in Africa: Are the challenges insurmountable? Annals of Anatomy—Anatomischer Anzeiger, 252, 152196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurt, E., Yurdakul, S., & Ataç, A. (2013). An overview of the technologies used for anatomy education in terms of medical history. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurul, R., Ögün, M. N., Narin, A. N., Avci, Ş., & Yazgan, B. (2020). An alternative method for anatomy training: Immersive virtual reality. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(5), 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, J., Lee, S. Y., Jeon, K., Lee, Y., Kim, K., Park, J., Oh, B., & Lee, M. (2020). Deep learning–Based algorithm for detecting aortic stenosis using electrocardiography. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9(7), e014717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, M. D., Truong, M., Douglas, P., & Selwyn, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: Promises and perils. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(2), 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y. S., Lam, C. S. N., & See, C. (2021). Using a machine learning architecture to create an AI-Powered chatbot for anatomy education. Medical Science Educator, 31(6), 1729–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lillehaug, S., & Lajoie, S. P. (1998). AI in medical education—Another grand challenge for medical informatics. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 12(3), 197–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of CHATGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lobachev, O., Berthold, M., Pfeffer, H., Guthe, M., & Steiniger, B. S. (2021). Inspection of histological 3D reconstructions in virtual reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, 628449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, M., Dhanaliwala, A., Morley, C., Choudhry, O., Nadolski, G., Hunt, S., & Gade, T. (2022). Abstract No. 530 Focused anatomy lessons using augmented reality for teaching interventional radiology procedures. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 33(6), S196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukan, E. (2024, September 16). 8 uses of AI in education. Synthesia. Available online: https://www.synthesia.io/learn/ai-applications/education#:~:text=AI%20adaptive%20learning%20platforms%20like,interactive%2C%20they%20make%20it%20stick (accessed on 13 October 2024).
- Ma, L., Yu, S., Xu, X., Amadi, S. M., Zhang, J., & Wang, Z. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in 3D printing physical organ models. Materials Today Bio, 23, 100792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mao, R. Q., Lan, L., Kay, J., Lohre, R., Ayeni, O. R., Goel, D. P., & De Sa, D. (2021). Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: A systematic review. Journal of Surgical Research, 268, 40–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Microsoft. (n.d.). Microsoft hololens. Microsoft learn. Available online: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/ (accessed on 14 October 2024).
- Moro, C., Štromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(6), 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morton, D. A., & Colbert-Getz, J. M. (2016). Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom’s taxonomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(2), 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moxham, B. J., & Plaisant, O. (2014). The history of the teaching of gross anatomy—How we got to where we are! European Journal of Anatomy, 18(3), 219–244. Available online: https://eurjanat.com/v1/journal/paper.php?id=140164bm (accessed on 28 January 2025).
- Murphy, S. V., Skardal, A., & Atala, A. (2012). Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 101A(1), 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Najjar, R. (2023). Redefining Radiology: A review of Artificial intelligence integration in medical imaging. Diagnostics, 13(17), 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noel, G. P. J. C. (2023). Evaluating AI-powered text-to-image generators for anatomical illustration: A comparative study. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(5), 979–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ossa, L. A., Rost, M., Lorenzini, G., Shaw, D. M., & Elger, B. S. (2022). A smarter perspective: Learning with and from AI-cases. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 135, 102458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Papa, V., Varotto, E., Vaccarezza, M., Ballestriero, R., Tafuri, D., & Galassi, F. M. (2019). The teaching of anatomy throughout the centuries: From herophilus to plastination and beyond. Medicina Historica, 3(2), 69–77. [Google Scholar]
- Par Equity. (n.d.). PathXL|Par equity. Available online: https://www.parequity.com/portfolio/pathxl (accessed on 25 June 2024).
- Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Köpf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., . . . Chintala, S. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv, arXiv:1912.01703. [Google Scholar]
- Patra, A., Asghar, A., Chaudhary, P., & Ravi, K. S. (2022). Integration of innovative educational technologies in anatomy teaching: New normal in anatomy education. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 44(1), 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2012). SciKit-Learn: Machine learning in Python. arXiv, arXiv:1201.0490. [Google Scholar]
- Philips. (2016, June 21). Philips expands digital pathology solutions. Available online: https://www.philips.co.uk/healthcare/sites/pathology/release-press/20160621-philips-expands-its-digital-pathology-solutions-portfolio-with-the-acquisition-of-pathxl (accessed on 18 August 2024).
- Phillips, A. W., Smith, S. G., & Straus, C. M. (2013). The role of radiology in preclinical anatomy. Academic Radiology, 20(3), 297–304.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rabbo, F. A., Garrigues, F., Lefèvre, C., & Seizeur, R. (2015). Interactive anatomical teaching: Integrating radiological anatomy within topographic anatomy. Morphologie, 100(328), 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakha, E. A., Toss, M., Shiino, S., Gamble, P., Jaroensri, R., Mermel, C. H., & Chen, P. C. (2020). Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in pathology: A clinical perspective. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 74(7), 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramos-Bossini, A. J. L., Cornejo, D. L., Guerrero, P. R., & Santiago, F. R. (2024). The educational impact of radiology in anatomy teaching: A field study using cross-sectional imaging and 3D printing for the study of the spine. Academic Radiology, 31(1), 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roach, J. R. 2023 July 24. The making of the HoloLens 2: How advanced AI built Microsoft’s vision for ubiquitous computing—Source. Microsoft. Available online: https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/innovation/hololens-2-shipping-to-customers/#:~:text=The%20sensor%2Dpacked%20holographic%20computing,basic%20human%20impulses%3A%20exchanging%20knowledge (accessed on 14 October 2024).
- Sabzalieva, E., Valentini, A., & UNESCO IESALC. (2023). The new regional convention for the recognition of studies, degrees and diplomas in latin america and the caribbean (2019) [Report]. In UNESCO international institute for higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean (IESALC) (p. 7). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available online: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/regional-convention-recognition-studies-diplomas-and-degrees-higher-education-latin-america-and-0 (accessed on 16 August 2024).
- Select Science. (n.d.). Selectscience. Available online: https://www.selectscience.net/company/pathxl#company_description (accessed on 16 August 2024).
- Sieben, A., Oparka, R., & Erolin, C. (2017). Histology in 3D: Development of an online interactive student resource on epithelium. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 40(2), 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sousa, M. J., Mas, F. D., Pesqueira, A., Lemos, C., Verde, J. M., & Cobianchi, L. (2021). The potential of AI in health higher education to increase the students’ learning outcomes. TEM Journal, 10, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010). The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3(2), 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, M. D. (2010). Building virtual models by postprocessing radiology images: A guide for anatomy faculty. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3(5), 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States National Library of Medicine (NLM), Mayo Clinic, Kitware Inc., The University of Iowa & NLM’s Intramural Research Program. (n.d.). SimpleITK—Home. SimpleITK. Available online: https://simpleitk.org/ (accessed on 12 October 2024).
- Usmani, A., Imran, M., & Javaid, Q. (2022). Usage of artificial intelligence and virtual reality in medical studies. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 38(4), 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vats, S., Singh, S., Kala, G., Tarar, R., & Dhawan, S. (2021). iDoc-X: An artificial intelligence model for tuberculosis diagnosis and localization. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 24(5), 1257–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vella, D. (n.d.). Cellular transport. Available online: https://www.smartsparrow.com/demos/v-lab-cellular-transport/ (accessed on 14 October 2024).
- Wood, E. A., Ange, B. L., & Miller, D. D. (2021). Are we ready to integrate artificial intelligence literacy into medical school curriculum: Students and faculty survey. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 8, 23821205211024078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J., Meng, Y., Qiu, K., Topatana, W., Li, S., Wei, C., Chen, T., Chen, M., Ding, Z., & Niu, G. (2022). Applications of artificial intelligence based on medical imaging in Glioma: Current state and future challenges. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, 892056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yu, D., Yao, K., & Zhang, Y. (2015). The computational network toolkit [Best of the Web]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32(6), 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yushkevich, P. A., Gao, Y., & Gerig, G. (2016, August 16–20). ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images. 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 3342–3345), Orlando, FL, USA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarei, M., Mamaghani, H. E., Abbasi, A., & Hosseini, M. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in medical education: A review of benefits, challenges, and solutions. Medicina Clínica Práctica, 7(2), 100422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y., Feng, H., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, S. (2024). Exploring the application of the artificial-intelligence-integrated platform 3D Slicer in medical imaging education. Diagnostics, 14(2), 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- zSpace, Inc. (2024). Human anatomy atlas by visible body. zSpace. Available online: https://zspace.com/edu/info/human-anatomy-atlas-for-zspace (accessed on 13 October 2024).
ML algorithms | |
ML divided into supervised, semi-supervised, and non-supervised models. Supervised learning techniques are used to analyze medical images and predict outcomes. These techniques can be integrated into anatomy teaching to identify anatomical organs and detect abnormalities. The most used ML tools are: | Scikit-learn 1.6 which is a Python 3.8 library for data analysis and mining. It can be used to build models to identify organs and structures from given images and illustrations (Pedregosa et al., 2012). |
TensorFlow 2.16.1 and PyTorch 2.6 both can be used to develop DL models that perform complex tasks like image segmentation and classification (Abadi et al., 2016; Paszke et al., 2019). | |
DL algorithms | |
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs) are used in recognizing certain organ features from radiographs, CTs, and MRIs (Yu et al., 2015d; Dosovitskiy et al., 2020). From an anatomy teaching perspective, they can be used in teaching students to understand radiological anatomy. Some examples of DL algorithms include: | CNNs including ResNet and U-net are useful for image segmentation and detection of organs of interest. |
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are used to translate certain anatomy courses to different languages (Yu et al., 2015). | |
ViT is integrated into complex datasets like histological slides and CT to identify structures of interest (Dosovitskiy et al., 2020). | |
CycleGAN is a powerful tool for image generation that can be used to create state-of-the-art illustrations for anatomy teaching (Dosovitskiy et al., 2020). | |
NLP algorithms | |
NLP algorithms are used to generate content automatically after searching the available databases. Additionally, they are commonly used to create customized chatbots able to answer anatomy-related questions with a high degree of accuracy. Examples of NLPs are as follows: | GPT models, with chatGPT being the most popular model, and which was developed by openAI (Gallifant et al., 2024). It can assist in answering questions, creating plans, and creating educational content. |
SpaCY is an open Python library used to process medical texts. It helps to conduct NLP on large texts with high speed. It can be used to facilitate students understanding of anatomy concepts and terminologies (Explosion, n.d.). |
N | Article Citation | Aim | Study Method/Type | Software Used (AI Model Used, ML or DL) | Parameters Studied | Recommendation | Future Work | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Noel (2023) | Explored the capabilities of various AI-powered text-to-image generators in generating detailed and accurate anatomical illustrations of the human skull, human heart, and human brain | Experimental research | Microsoft Bing Image Creator Powered by DALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion, and Craiyon V3 | Degree of details and accuracy. compare different AI-powered tools to determine their effectiveness and reliability examining the output of these generators and comparing them to established standards of accuracy | To improve the training databases for AI-powered text-to-image generators by incorporating a larger collection of anatomically correct images. Including a diverse range of accurate anatomical references. | Not Available (NA) | Compared only three software’s. |
2 | Ilgaz and Çelik (2023) | Evaluated how various features of open AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Bard in their current form can contribute to anatomy education with the perspective of questioning, answering, and writing articles, and aimed to respond to some controversial topics. | Experimental research | ChatGPT 3.5 and Google Bard | The correctness in answering the questions of the Medical Specialty Exam (MSE) last five years a total of 131 questions in anatomy. -The validity of the anatomical information’s and degree of details in question generation And article writing | The need for continuous improvement and validation of LLMs for reliable healthcare practices. Both models were able to generate multiple-choice questions with a high degree of accuracy. However, the performance of the models in article writing was not yet at a sufficient level. The study also found that the use of LLMs in medical education requires caution. | Further research is needed to increase the accuracy of the models and to better understand how they can be used effectively in educational settings. There is a need for future studies on the application of 2D and 3D figures in anatomy education with other AI applications. | Limitations in dealing with potential inaccuracies. |
3 | Arun et al. (2024) | Evaluated AI’s ability to provide clear and accurate anatomy information and generated a custom interactive and intelligent chatbot (Anatbuddy) | Experimental research | Open AI Application Programming Interface (API) to build interactive chat pot | Factual accuracy, relevance, completeness, coherence, and fluency | Anatomy profession should develop a custom AI chatbot for anatomy education utilizing a carefully curated knowledge base to ensure accuracy. | -Anatbuddy was trained only on thoracic anatomy content from open-source anatomy materials. -Inter-rater agreement could not be computed due to the study’s design. | -Improve the capabilities of customizable chatbots to improve students’ learning experience. -More research is needed to expand its capabilities across anatomical regions and incorporate image-based information. -Further research is needed to ascertain the acceptance of the technology by educators and students. |
4 | Chheang et al. (2024) | Introduced a VR environment with a generative AI-embodied virtual assistant to help in responding to anatomy questions varying in cognitive complexity with the ability to communicate verbally. | Pilot experimental research | 3D by Unity game engine (version2019.4.34f1) -ChatGPT 3.5, and AI-based library (Avatar SDK), and Microsof Azure Speech service to enable natural interactions | Scores obtained from knowledge- and analysis-based questions | Utilization of AI models in many fields of anatomy as the combination of both virtual assistant configurations has the potential to offer a comprehensive solution for assisting and enhancing the learning experience. | -Should investigate the conversations’ transcripts and the responses’ accuracy. -Levels of experience should be considered as a covariate, or a balance of the groups based on their level of prior VR/virtual assistant. | -It is a pilot study was conducted with 16 participants. -The way a participant phrased a question could impact the response they received. -The lack of transparency and unclear information on the data source used, and other related consequences. |
5 | Li et al. (2021) | Utilized an open-source machine learning architecture and fine-tuned it with a customized database to train an AI dialogue system to teach medical students’ anatomy. | Experimental research | ML Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers’ BERT | self-reported confidence | AI chatbots provide high level of student engagement. Recommend building AI systems based on open-source resources for medical education. | NA | NA |
6 | Jin et al. (2022) | Integrated neural intelligence with artificial intelligence to obtain objects from medical images by formalizing an anatomy-guided deep learning object recognition approach named AAR-DL. | Experimental research | 4 modules: AA-R module: Fuzzy anatomy module, DL-R module, refinement, final detection module | N/M | High-level anatomy guidance improves recognition performance of DL methods. Anatomy guidance brings stability and robustness to DL approaches for object localization and reduces training time. | Develop the model by including the formulation of anatomy-focused loss functions, injecting anatomic knowledge at deeper layers of the networks | Related to modelability of the objects and the appropriate incorporation of the models into AAR-DL. |
7 | Buzzaccarini et al. (2024) | Aimed to understand whether Midjourney could create images that were not only realistic, but also correct in terms of anatomy. | Experimental research | Midjourney 5.2 | Accuracy, anatomical correctness, and visual impact. | Collaboration between AI developers and medical experts might pave the way for more accurate and clinically relevant images. | -Test other tools and compare them. -Collaboration to develop better versions. | Used and tested only one single AI tool, Midjourney. Other tools are available worldwide and may be more accurate and correct than Midjourney |
8 | Collins et al. (2024) | -Developed AI-powered anatomy tutor. -Assess the efficacy and performance of anatomyGPT | Experimental research | GPT-builder | Performance, answers accuracy, | Instructors and students could create their own custom GPTs for teaching and learning anatomy. Research is needed to develop the potential of GPTs for anatomy education. | Compare GPT-4 with other large language models on achievement tests and tutoring tasks. Design, deploy, and study GPTs for other specific theoretical perspective such as the ACT-R theory of cognition. | First, the size of the question sets to evaluate the performance of the GPTs was relatively small The challenge of acquiring open-source anatomy resources to incorporate into GPTs. |
9 | Castellano et al. (2023) | Investigated effectiveness of the mobile gamified technological tool with AI virtual assistant in learning Anatomy. | Experimental research (empirical study and quasi-experiment statistical technique) | AIEd gamification technique and virtual assistant chatbot based on NLP | Academic performance pre-test and post-test. | Gamified components support students in learning anatomy. In addition, the virtual assistant recommendations enabled the students to improve with feedback. | Search the area of reinforcement learning, and to study the influence of the gamified technological tool in other health-related programs. | It does not allow the strategies delivered by the recommender system to be redirected directly to a gamified component, issues in sampling error, and didn’t record their score in final exam, just in pre and posttest. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sirasanagandla, S.R.; Rajendran, S.S.; Mogali, S.R.; Bouchareb, Y.; Shaffi, N.; Al-Rahbi, A. From Cadavers to Neural Networks: A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence Tools in Anatomy Teaching. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030283
Sirasanagandla SR, Rajendran SS, Mogali SR, Bouchareb Y, Shaffi N, Al-Rahbi A. From Cadavers to Neural Networks: A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence Tools in Anatomy Teaching. Education Sciences. 2025; 15(3):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030283
Chicago/Turabian StyleSirasanagandla, Srinivasa Rao, Sharmila Saran Rajendran, Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali, Yassine Bouchareb, Noushath Shaffi, and Adham Al-Rahbi. 2025. "From Cadavers to Neural Networks: A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence Tools in Anatomy Teaching" Education Sciences 15, no. 3: 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030283
APA StyleSirasanagandla, S. R., Rajendran, S. S., Mogali, S. R., Bouchareb, Y., Shaffi, N., & Al-Rahbi, A. (2025). From Cadavers to Neural Networks: A Narrative Review on Artificial Intelligence Tools in Anatomy Teaching. Education Sciences, 15(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030283